Academic literature on the topic 'Organon (Aristotles)'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Organon (Aristotles).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Organon (Aristotles)"

1

Díaz López, Lucas. "El Uso Aristotélico de Variables en Lógica y sus Supuestos Ontológicos." Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 19, no. 38 (2011): 33–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philosophica2011193810.

Full text
Abstract:
A logical reading on Aristotle’s Organon discovers some inconsistencies in the text which have to be solved by reducing them to metaphysical decisions of the author, if they are not just identified as deficiencies in the exposition that should be corrected. The present article tries to display a line of reading paying attention to those so-called inconsistencies, in an attempt to understand them as specific steps in Aristotle’s research. In order to this goal it focuses on the exposition procedure of the Aristotelian figures: the use of variables, whose introduction by Aristotle has been celeb
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Llovet Abascal, José María. "¿Se puede considerar formal la lógica de Aristóteles?" Daímon, no. 82 (January 1, 2021): 99–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.344561.

Full text
Abstract:
En este trabajo planteo la pregunta de si la lógica de Aristóteles es o no una lógica formal. Respondo que, aunque las doctrinas contenidas en el Organon inauguren, efectivamente, la lógica formal, hay también buenas razones para pensar que Aristóteles no creía que la lógica fuese una disciplina que pudiera prescindir por completo del contenido. In this paper I discuss the question of whether Aristotle’s logic is a formal logic or not. I answer that, although the doctrines contained in the Organon inaugurate indeed formal logic, there are also good reasons to think that Aristotle did not belie
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Deitz, Luc. "Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic." Vivarium 45, no. 1 (2007): 113–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853407x202539.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractFrancesco Patrizi da Cherso's Discussiones peripateticae (1581) are one of the most comprehensive analyses of the whole of Aristotelian philosophy to be published before Werner Jaeger's Aristoteles. The main thrust of the argument in the Discussiones is that whatever Aristotle had said that was true was not new, and that whatever he had said that was new was not true. The article shows how Patrizi proves this with respect to the Organon, and deals with the implications for the history af ancient philosophy in general implied by his stance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sitko, Yu L. "SYSTEM OF SIGNS BY CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE AS HIS REFLECTION OF STUDY ABOUT CATEGORIES AND PREDICABILIA: IDEAS OF THE MIDDLE AGES AND THE MODERN PERIOD." Memoirs of NovSU, no. 6 (2023): 744–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.34680/2411-7951.2023.6(51).744-759.

Full text
Abstract:
The article attempts to investigate scientific background underlying the system of signs proposed by Ch.S. Peirce. The study is based on the hypothesis that Ch.S.Peirce borrowed the principle of systematisation from the Latin translation of “Organon” by Aristotle published by Julius Pacius in 1584. Having analysed this issue of “Organon” the author demonstrates that the system of categories and predicabilia by Aristotle was transformed into a diagram presenting the interconnections between categories as judgements. Along with that it is shown that Pacius calculated the systems consisting of mo
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dmitriev, Igor S. "The Gay Science of Francis Bacon." Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 57, no. 1 (2020): 181–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/eps202057114.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is the study of some aspects of the methodology of scientific knowledge that F. Bacon addressed in his treatise “New Organon” (1620) and in other works in one way or another related to his work on the project of the Instauratio Magna Scientiarum. The article focuses on the following three questions: Bacon’s attitude to Aristotle’s legacy, the context of Bacon’s doctrine of idols and the reasons for the English philosopher to choose a fragmented (aphoristic) form of presentation of his ideas in the “New Organon” and in some other works. Based on an analysis of Bacon’s works related
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Anders, John. "Problēmata Mēchanika, the Analytics, and Projectile Motion." Apeiron 46, no. 2 (2013): 106–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2012-0027.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The project of this paper is to look at problēmata in the Organon, how the Mēchanika employs problēmata, what these texts can teach us about each other, and the significance of all these things for the difficulties that Aristotelian natural philosophy encounters in explaining projectile motion. My treatment of the last item will highlight a pun used in the Mēchanika and argue that it makes a serious point. The paper proceeds as follows: first I will briefly present a reading of how problēmata are understood by Aristotle in the Organon. Next I will examine how problēmata are treated in
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Grau Torras, Sergi. "Aristotle in the Medical Works of Arnau de Vilanova (c. 1240–1311)." Early Science in Medicine 19, no. 3 (2014): 236–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15733823-00193p02.

Full text
Abstract:
Arnau de Vilanova, one of the most important physicians of the Latin Middle Ages, was familiar with the vast majority of Aristotle’s works that had been translated into Latin. He used a wide range of them, such as the Organon – the introductory books on logic – and the natural philosophical books, which cover a different branches of knowledge. He used Aristotle as an authority, trying to reconcile him with the field of medicine as practiced in his time. In so going, he defined a new theoretical model of medicine by the standards of natural philosophy, while continuing to emphasize the boundari
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Geudens, Christophe. "Embracing the Lusitanian Legacy." Vivarium 55, no. 4 (2017): 307–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341343.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This article puts forward an analysis of the theory of signs contained in the Prodidagmata ad logicam Aristotelis (1627), a compendium on logic written by the Flemish philosopher and Louvain professor Laurentius Ghiffene (1594-1637). Focusing on Ghiffene’s definition and division of a sign and his account of the problem of self-reference, the author argues that Ghiffene positioned himself in the tradition of the Conimbricenses and relied extensively on their influential commentary on Aristotle’s Organon, published in 1606. The aim of the present contribution is to shed new light on th
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Omoloeva, А. S., and А. E. Simbirtseva. "W. Whewell: Induction and Deduction in Novum Organon Renovatum." Siberian Journal of Philosophy 20, no. 4 (2023): 113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-4-113-126.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper aims to expose the induction – deduction relation within W. Whewell’s treatise «Novum Organon Renovatum». Since Aristotle’s time. induction and deduction have been interpreted as independent and even «opposite» inferences (ways of connecting premises and conclusions), but this intuition is violated in W. Whewell’s works. Based on contemporary practice of some specific natural sciences W. Whewell quite reasonably concludes that “Aristotle overlooks a step which is of far more importance to our knowledge, namely, the invention of the second extreme term” and that “induction moves upwar
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Meyer, Martin F. "Die Natur des Organischen." Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 13 (December 31, 2008): 32–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.13.03mey.

Full text
Abstract:
The nature of the organic. On the scientific significance of Aristotelian biology. The core thesis of the paper is that the constitution of biological science begins with a conceptual innovation with far-reaching consequences with effect up to the present: by conceiving the parts of living beings as organs (that is, as tools), Aristotle laid the foundation stone for a functional explanation of animate nature. Comparative anatomy is thus transformed from a merely descriptive to an explanatory theory. The point of the discussion is above all that a functional explanation must not be confused wit
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!