Academic literature on the topic 'Orthopedic traction'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Orthopedic traction.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Orthopedic traction"
Gautam, Sapana, and Dinesh Kumar Thapa. "Knowledge and Practice among Nurses of Traction in Patients: In a Tertiary Care Center." Eastern Green Neurosurgery 2, no. 1 (January 29, 2020): 47–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/egn.v2i1.27463.
Full textSolano-Mendoza, B., A. Iglesias-Linares, RM Yañez-Vico, A. Mendoza-Mendoza, JJ Alió-Sanz, and E. Solano-Reina. "Maxillary Protraction at Early Ages. The Revolution of New Bone Anchorage Appliances." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 37, no. 2 (December 1, 2012): 219–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.37.2.q0k770403v443053.
Full textMelamed, Eitan, Amir Blumenfeld, Boaz Kalmovich, Yona Kosashvili, Guy Lin, Amir Korngreen, Igal Mirowsky, Rami Mosheiff, Dror Robinson, and Moshe Salai. "Prehospital Care of Orthopedic Injuries." Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 22, no. 1 (February 2007): 22–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00004295.
Full textShmyrev, V. I., А. I. Romanov, К. L. Kinlein, Т. S. Rakova, and О. V. Balakireva. "The results of the implementation of the therapeutic system "detensor" in the complex of rehabilitation measures in patients with a neurological profile." Neurology Bulletin XXVIII, no. 3-4 (December 15, 1996): 38–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/nb79654.
Full textBezabeh, Bahiru, Biruk L. Wamisho, and Maxime JM Coles. "Treatment of Adult Femoral Shaft Fractures Using the Perkins Traction at Addis Ababa Tikur Anbessa University Hospital: The Ethiopian Experience." International Surgery 97, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 78–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.9738/cc48.1.
Full textVukasinovic, Zoran, Dusko Spasovski, Igor Seslija, Zorica Zivkovic, and Milan Stevanovic. "Conservative treatment of Malgaigne fracture in young female - case report." Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 141, no. 11-12 (2013): 819–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sarh1312819v.
Full textGouda, Rania. "Nurses’ Performance for Orthopedic Patients with Traction or Internal Fixatio." Port Said Scientific Journal of Nursing 4, no. 2 (December 1, 2017): 193–2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/pssjn.2017.33082.
Full textGoldberg, Tyler D., Stefan Kreuzer, Filippo Randelli, and George A. Macheras. "Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty with an orthopedic traction table." Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 33, no. 4 (August 2021): 331–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00064-021-00722-x.
Full textMarciniak, Tomasz, Maciej Brożyński, and Andrzej Wit. "Ultrasound guided joint space distance changes during manual traction of acromioclavicular joint in young and healthy adults." Advances in Rehabilitation 29, no. 3 (September 1, 2015): 13–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rehab-2015-0028.
Full textJordan, Robert W., Gurdip S. Chahal, and Matthew H. Davies. "Role of Damage Control Orthopedics and Early Total Care in the Multiple Injured Trauma Patients." Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine 5 (January 2014): CMTIM.S12258. http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/cmtim.s12258.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Orthopedic traction"
Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani. "Reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior: influência da solidarização e da rotação do enxerto na fixação com pinos transversos." Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, 2013. http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/610.
Full textPurpose: To make comparison between sewed and not sewed and between two different rotational positions of transverse fixed tendon graft inside bone tunnel. Methods: Thirty-six quadrupled bovine tendon grafts fixation systems in porcine femurs models were divided into four groups concerning rotational positioning inside de bone tunnel and the presence of sewing through the tendon sections. By measuring displacement and load at the resistance limit, first validated peak and 445N point, the groups were compared and the rigidity was achieved. The intermediate validated peaks were observed. Results: looped positioned groups showed higher fail points levels than the transfixed groups using all parameters (p<0,05), as well as greater rigidity when using the maximum load as fail parameter. In transfixed tendons groups, the sewed tendon group showed greater Fmax and Fp (Fmax 1555,4N ± 408 versus 1135,2N ± 448,7 and Fp 1539,9N ± 400,8 versus 950,5N ± 599,8), p<0,05. Intermediate peaks incidence was greater in the not-sewed/not-looped (transfixed) group Conclusion: looped positioned group gave better results: greater Fmax, Fp, and rigidity. The transfixed tendons group had better response to tensile load when sewed.
Hicklin, John Renshaw. "The effectiveness of Leander traction versus Static linear traction on chronic facet syndrome patients : a randomised clinical trial." Thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/524.
Full textThe aim of this study was establish if Leander versus Static traction was useful for the treatment of facet syndrome, a common type of mechanical lower back pain seen by chiropractors. Two groups of fifteen participants were chosen on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The first objective was to determine if Static linear traction was effective for the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome in terms of subjective and objective findings. The second objective was to determine if Leander traction was effective for the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome in terms of subjective and objective clinical findings. Lastly the third objective was to compare the subjective and objective clinical findings for both groups. Design: A randomised, two group parallel controlled clinical trial was carried out between the two sample groups. Participants had to have had chronic lower back pain (> 3months). Thirty symptomatic volunteer participants between 25 and 55 were randomly divided into two equal groups – group A (Leander traction) received 5 treatments over a 2 week period. Similarly, group B (Static linear traction) also received 5 treatments over a 2 week period. Algometer readings, Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS101), Pain Severity Scale (PSS) and Oswestery Disabilty Index (ODI) were used as v assessment tools. Subjective and objective clinical findings were taken on the first and second visits (i.e. 48 hours) prior to treatment and immediately after treatment. Another set of subjective and objective readings were taken one week after the fifth treatment in order to gauge the long term effects of both treatments. No treatment was given on the sixth visit. Pressure tolerance measurements using an algometer were taken at the end ranges of motion in Kemp’s test and spinal extension. Outcome measures: SPSS version 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analysis of data. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The two groups were compared at baseline in terms of demographics variables and location using Pearson’s chi square tests and ttests as appropriate. Intra-group comparisons were made between all time points. A significant time effect indicated successful treatment intervention. Inter-group comparisons were achieved using repeated measures ANOVA tests for each outcome measured separately. A significant time group interaction effect indicated a significant treatment effect. Profile plots were used to assess the trend and direction of the treatment effect. Results: The results of the study showed that Leander traction and Static linear traction were both effective for treating chronic lumbar facet syndrome and no statistically significant difference was found between subjective and objective clinical findings between the two groups.
Lemmer, Richardt. "A comparative study between cervical spine traction, cervical spine traction post adjustment and adjustment alone in the treatment of acute cervical facet syndrome." Thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/8741.
Full textPurpose: The purpose of this randomised comparative study was to establish the effects which these modalities had on pain perception and range of motion in patients with acute cervical facet syndrome. This was done by comparing manual cervical spine traction alone; to cervical spine adjustments alone to manual cervical spine traction applied post cervical spine adjustments. Method: A total of 30 participants were recruited for this study by placing advertisements in and around the University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus. Participants had to meet the requirements of the inclusion criteria and were excluded if they were found to be unfit for this particular study. The 30 participants were asked to draw a number out of a bag which therefor randomly divided them into three groups of 10 participants each. Procedure: Participants in group A received manual cervical traction alone as their treatment. Participants in group B received cervical spine adjustments alone as their treatment. Finally, participants in group C were treated by performing manual cervical spine traction after the cervical spine adjustment. Each participant was treated a total of six times over a two week period. Measurements were taken on the first, fourth and a seventh consultation. Results: Regarding the Subjective readings, there was an improvement with regards to the Numerical Pain Rating Scale values for all three groups, but the combination group of manual cervical spine traction performed post cervical spine adjustment, showed the greatest improvement over the trial period on intra-group analysis. No statistical significant changes were found on inter group analysis. There was an improvement in Neck Pain Disability Index values for all three groups, but the cervical spine adjustment group showed the greatest improvement over the trial period on intra-group analysis. No statistical significant changes were found on inter group analysis. Regarding the Objective readings, there was an improvement in pressure algometer readings for all three groups, but the cervical spine adjustment group showed the greatest improvement over the trial period on intra-group analysis. No statistical significant changes were found on inter group analysis. There was an improvement in Cervical Range of Motion readings for all three groups, but the combination group of manual cervical spine traction performed post cervical spine adjustment showed the greatest improvement for flexion, extension and bilateral rotation on intra-group analysis. However, for bilateral lateral flexion, the cervical spine adjustment group showed the greatest improvement on intra group analysis. No statistical significant changes were found on inter group analysis. Conclusion: There were clinically significant improvements within each of the three groups on intra group analysis but no clinically significant differences were found on inter group analysis. Therefore, none of the groups could be singled out as being the best treatment approach for acute cervical facet syndrome. With regards to the Chiropractic profession the outcome of this study therefore suggests, that the chiropractic adjustment alone is sufficient in treatment of acute cervical facet syndrome as none of the groups proved to be superior.
Palmer, Melanie Jane. "The comparison of McMannis traction and intermittent traction both in conjuction with chiropractic spinal manipulation in the management of chronic mechanical lower back pain." Thesis, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2726.
Full textThe purpose of this study was to compare the effects of McMannis traction and Intermittent traction, both m conjunction with chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of chronic i.e. longer than four weeks, mechanical lower back pain. It was hypothesised by the author that McMannis traction would be the traction treatment of choice, as it enables the joints of the lumbar vertebrae to be moved through their normal anatomical range of motion while being traeticned axially. In addition this type of traction is more specific and allows the therapist to determine the amount of traction that is being applied to the patient because it is being applied manually. Intermittent traction on the other hand is a motorised non-specific traction and affects several joints at one time (Saunders 1979).
M
Kretzmann, Heidi M. "A study of the relative effectiveness of McManis traction used as an adjunct to spinal manipulative therapy." Thesis, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2706.
Full textMechanical lower back pain is a common clinical entity which encompasses a spectrum of disorders. studies show that spinal manipulative therapy is of value in the treatment of mechanical lower back pain, while some chiropractors are of the opinion that McManis traction offers an effective adjunct to spinal manipulative therapy in the treatment of such conditions
M
Books on the topic "Orthopedic traction"
Geraldine, Carini-Garcia, and Birmingham Jacqueline Joseph, eds. Traction: Assessment and management. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994.
Find full text1921-, Basmajian John V., ed. Manipulation, traction, and massage. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985.
Find full textBergmann, Thomas F. Mechanically assisted manual techniques: Distraction procedures. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998.
Find full textAmerican Physical Therapy Association St. Orthopedic Traction and the Physical Therapist: An Anthology. American Physical Therapy Association, 1985.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Orthopedic traction"
Hodax, Jonathan D. "Traction Pin Placement." In The Orthopedic Consult Survival Guide, 51–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52347-7_10.
Full textPorrino, Jack, and Alvin R. Wyatt. "Fracture Fixation." In Musculoskeletal Imaging Volume 1, edited by Mihra S. Taljanovic and Tyson S. Chadaz, 130–33. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190938161.003.0027.
Full textPandey, Sureshwar, and Anil Pandey. "Traction in Orthopedics." In Fundamentals of Orthopedics and Trauma, 570. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/12456_38.
Full textKakkad, Subhash. "Limb's Tractions." In Practical Orthopedics, 32. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11467_7.
Full textKakkad, Subhash. "Spinal Tractions and Tractions in Fracture Dislocations." In Practical Orthopedics, 51. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11467_8.
Full textTK, Pramod. "Splints and Traction." In Best Aid to Orthopedics, 35. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11512_4.
Full textKakkad, Subhash. "Management of Patients in Traction." In Practical Orthopedics, 25. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11467_6.
Full textKumar, Upendra. "Orthopedic Tractions and their Equipment." In Bedside Clinics in Orthopedics (Ward Round and Tables), 32. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/13025_5.
Full textClark, William. "The Twin Block Traction Technique." In Twin Block Functional Therapy: Applications in Dentofacial Orthopedics, 165. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/12534_12.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Orthopedic traction"
Fox, E., D. Fox, D. Hutcheson, and B. Torres. "Evaluation of Commercial Paw Traction Products for Dogs." In Abstracts of the 6th World Veterinary Orthopedic Congress. Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758249.
Full text