Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Outcome Rating Scale

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Outcome Rating Scale'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 11 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Outcome Rating Scale.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Outcome Rating Scale"

1

Hafkenscheid, Anton. "De Outcome rating scale (ORS) en de Session rating scale (SRS)." Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 36, no. 6 (2010): 394–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12485-010-0173-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Mortimer, Ann M. "Symptom rating scales and outcome in schizophrenia." British Journal of Psychiatry 191, S50 (2007): s7—s14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.191.50.s7.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundSymptom rating scales are now well established in schizophrenia research buttheir scores are notthe same as outcomeAimsTo appraise the usefulness of symptom rating scales in evaluating the outcome of people with schizophreniaMethodLiterature on the use of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) in schizophrenia research was studiedResultsScales were designed to make diagnoses, to categorise patients, syndromes or both, and to demonstrate antipsychotic efficacy, as well as to measure outcome. T

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Purgato, M., and C. Barbui. "Dichotomizing rating scale scores in psychiatry: a bad idea?" Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 22, no. 1 (2012): 17–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2045796012000613.

Full text

Abstract:

In psychiatry, the use of rating scales as measures of outcome in clinical trials allows us to generate continuous outcome data, where each individual's outcome is measured in numbers. Continuous outcomes can be divided into two categories, such as improved and not improved, or may be kept continuous. This article briefly presents the main advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches, which are commonly employed in the analyses of rating scale scores in clinical trials and systematic reviews.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Boon, Albert, Sjouk De Boer, and Emmeline Ravestijn. "De Child outcome rating scale (C-ORS) en deChild session rating scale (C-SRS)." Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 38, no. 2 (2012): 73–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12485-012-0008-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Bonneson, Mary E., and Don M. Hartsough. "Development of the Crisis Call Outcome Rating Scale." Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55, no. 4 (1987): 612–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.55.4.612.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Campbell, Alistair, and Samantha Hemsley. "Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures." Clinical Psychologist 13, no. 1 (2009): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13284200802676391.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Trauer, Tom, Tom Callaly, Paul Hantz, John Little, Robert B. Shields, and Jenny Smith. "Health of the Nation Outcome Scales." British Journal of Psychiatry 174, no. 5 (1999): 380–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.174.5.380.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundIn Victoria, Australia, systematic assessment of outcomes in mental health services are being instituted.AimsTo carry out a large-scale field trial of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS).Method2137 clients were rated by mental health workers on the HoNOS, and about half were rated again within a few months.ResultsWhile interrater reliability of the total score was satisfactory, that of some individual items was unacceptable. Significant associations with age and gender were found, and clients with non-psychotic disorders obtained higher (i.e. worse) ratings than those wit

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Regner, Sean R., Nicholas S. Wilcox, Lisa S. Friedman, et al. "Friedreich Ataxia Clinical Outcome Measures." Journal of Child Neurology 27, no. 9 (2012): 1152–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0883073812448462.

Full text

Abstract:

Friedreich ataxia is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by ataxia, dysarthria, and areflexia. The authors report the progress of a large international noninterventional cohort (n = 410), tracking the natural history of disease progression using the neurologic examination-based Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale. The authors analyzed the rate of progression with cross-sectional analysis and longitudinal analysis over a 2-year period. The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale captured disease progression when used at 1 and 2 years following initial evaluation, with a lower rati

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Bantjes, Jason, Xanthe Hunt, Mark Tomlinson, and Anja Smit. "A case study of lessons learnt from implementing a routine outcome monitoring system for psychotherapy in a South African community clinic." South African Journal of Psychology 48, no. 2 (2017): 193–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0081246317720853.

Full text

Abstract:

Monitoring outcomes in psychotherapy is important for advancing research into empirically supported treatments, collecting data to inform practice-based evidence and for monitoring patient treatment responses during routine care. We implemented two routine outcome monitoring measures in a community psychology clinic in South Africa, namely, the Outcome Rating Scale and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. In this article, we adopt a case study methodology to describe and critically reflect on the implementation process and evaluate the utility of the outcome data collected during the first ye

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Davis, Sophia, Judith Baumhauer, Steven Karnyski, and Michelle Lawson. "AOFAS Position Statement on the Future Use of AOFAS Clinical Rating Scale." Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics 3, no. 3 (2018): 2473011418S0020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011418s00201.

Full text

Abstract:

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Measuring patient outcomes is a critical piece toward advancing medical care. A previous study reviewing the commonly obtained outcomes measures used in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery (Hunt 2013) demonstrated the AOFAS clinical rating scale was the most commonly reported measure over the past 10 years (2002-2011). Since that time, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society published a position statement recommending against the continued use of this rating scale. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of this position statement on th

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!