Academic literature on the topic 'P 90.5 UL 2009 D218'

TPS6635 Background: FLT3-ITD AML are associated with poor prognosis. We identified Sorafenib (S) as potent inhibitor of FLT3-ITD (Zhang W, JNCI, 2008; Borthakur G., Haematologica, 2010). FLT3-ITD is associated with overexpression of chemokine receptor CXCR4 and we found increased in vivo activity of S combined with CXCR4 inhibitor Plerixafor (P) and G-CSF (G) (Zeng Z et.al. Blood 2009). Here we report first data testing this concept in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. Methods: G (10 ug/kg) and P(240 ug/kg) were given s.c. QOD on days 1 – 13, S (400-600mg), S on d 1 - 28(one cycle). G/P was held when blasts > 5x104/uL. CD34, 38, 123, CXCR4 (1D9, 12G5), VLA4, CD44 and phospho-proteins were measured by flow cytometry. Results: 10 patients have been treated so far : 2 achieved CRp, 4 PR and 4 failed (NR), for an overall response rate of 6/10; 3/6 responders and 4/4 NR were previously treated with FLT3 inhibitors. 4/10 pts. developed hyperleukocytosis (and missed 1 to 5 doses of G/P), 6 skin rash and 3 hypertension. Analysis of cells mobilized in 22 cycles revealed a 29-fold increase in WBC, 41-fold in absolute blasts, 77-fold in granulocytes. Increase in circulating stem/progenitor cells was as follows: CD34+: 231-fold, CD34+/38- : 90-, CD34+/38-/123+(LSC) : 148-, CXCR4+: 139-, VLA-4+ : 68- and CD44+: 82-fold. Increase in LSC was correlated with baseline blasts and VLA4, not with CXCR4. FISH confirmed mobilization of leukemic cells. Increased levels of pERK and pAKT were observed in mobilized cells. Conclusion: The combination of G-CSF+Plerixafor appears superior in increasing circulating leukemic blasts and stem/progenitor cells in FLT3-ITD AML, as compared to Plerixafor alone in R/R AML(blast increase 2.1-fold; Uy et al. Blood, in press). Treatment resulted in 2/10 CRp and 4/10 PRs. Mobilized stem/progenitor cells displayed increased MAPK/AKT signaling and increased CXCR4 expression. This is the first clinical report of G-CSF/Plerixafor for the “mobilization” of AML cells, aimed at removing them from their protective bone marrow microenvironment. The initial results are providing proof-of–principle of this concept.

Abstract Abstract 3290 Background: Patients with high risk AML, defined as those with age > 60 years or multiple medical co-morbidities determined by Charleston comorbidity index (CCI) carry a poor prognosis and inferior outcomes after 7+3 induction chemotherapy. CR rates tend to range from 6–51% and induction death rates between 9–48%. We present here a single institution experience of high risk AML patients treated with an induction regimen consisting of high dose mitoxantrone and cytarabine (HiDAC/MITO). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with AML who received HiDAC/MITO induction from January 2009- January 2010 at our institution. Patients with age ≥60 or age <60 with high CCI received HiDAC at 3gm/m2 over three hours on days 1 to 5 plus MITO 80mg/m2 once on day 2. Effect of other high risk features including poor risk cytogenetics, therapy related AML (t-AML), AML with prior antecedent hematological disorder (AHD) and relapsed AML on treatment outcome were also evaluated. The primary endpoints of the study were CR (defined as bone marrow blasts <5%) at day 30 and treatment related mortality within 30 days of initiation of treatment. End of follow-up was June 30, 2010. Results: 20 AML had received HiDAC/MITO for remission induction. The median age was 66.5 years (range 47 to 78), those with age ≥ 70 was 8 (40%). CCI was ≥ 5 in 18 (90%) patients. Other high risk features included high risk cytogenetics in 8 (40%) and non-denovo AML (AML with AHD, t-AML or relapsed AML) in 11 (55%). Overall CR rate was 17 (85%, CI: 61%-96%) and 3 (15%) patients had refractory disease. There was no treatment related mortality. Median time to neutrophil recovery (>1000/ul) was 27 (range 19 to 37) days and median time to platelet recovery (>100,000/ul) was 28 days (range 23 to 44) days. Patients with non–denovo AML were more likely to be refractory to treatment or relapse after day 30. Median follow up of the entire cohort is 288 (range 29 to 530) days. 3 month and 6 month overall survival (OS) was 94.7% and 73.3% and progression free survival (PFS) 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively. The median OS was 410 days (CI: 243-*); (denovo 410 vs. others 381 days). Median PFS is 524 days (CI: 381-*); (denovo *not reached vs. others 381 days). 11(55%) patients were able to proceed to autologous (4) or allogeneic (7) stem cell transplantation (SCT) after receiving HiDAC/MITO. The time to transplant ranged from 44 to 195 days. Median OS of the patients who underwent SCT is 524 days versus 269 days for the non transplant group (p =0.0038). The HiDAC/MITO induction regimen was well tolerated. Cardiac toxicity defined by symptomatic CHF was noted in 6/20 patients. Of the six patients 2 had prior cardiac history and 1 had prior anthracycline exposure and 1 had both anthracycline exposure and cardiac history. Cardiac toxicity was delayed and identified by echo at a median of 90 range (42 to139) days after induction chemotherapy. None of these patients died from cardiac toxicity. Conclusions: In this high risk AML population, HiDAC/MITO induction was well tolerated and demonstrated an overall response rate of 85% and no induction deaths, allowing a substantial number (55%) of patients to proceed to SCT. Contrary to our expectations advanced age or multiple medical co-morbidities did not affect CR rate or survival, thus high lighting the utility of this regimen for high risk newly diagnosed elderly patients with AML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 142 FLT3-ITD AML are associated with poor prognosis. Our group identified Sorafenib (S) as potent inhibitor of FLT3-ITD (Zhang W, JNCI, 2008; Borthakur G., Haematologica, 2010). FLT3-ITD is also associated with overexpression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Utilizing preclinical in vitro and in vivo models we determined increased activity of S when combined with CXCR4 inhibitor Plerixafor (P) and G-CSF (G) (Zeng Z et.al. Blood 2009). Here we report clinical and translational data testing this concept in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. Clinical trial: G (10 ug/kg) and P(240 ug/kg) were given s.c. QOD on days 1 – 13, S (400–600mg) on d 1 – 28(one cycle). G/P was held when blasts exceeded 5×104/uL. Cell populations expressing CD34, 38, 123, CXCR4 (1D9, 12G5), VLA4, CD44 and phospho-proteins were assessed at baseline and at multiple time points during treatment by flow cytometry of up to 10 parameters and by flow cytometric mass spec using CyTOF. Results: 13 patients have been treated so far; responses are as follows: 1 CR, 3 CRp, 6 PR and 4 failed (NR), for an overall response rate of 10/13 (77%); One patients achieved 2 CRp. Six/13 patients, including 3/6 responders and 3/4 NR were previously treated with and considered refractory to FLT3 inhibitors. Four patients had additional D835 mutations: 2 failed and 2 achieved PRs, none of the CR/p patients carried this mutation. Side effects included hyperleukocytosis in 3/10 pts.(who missed 1 to 5 doses of G/P), skin rash (5 pts.), hand foot syndrome (3 pts.) hypertension (7 patients), diarrhea (10 pts.), nausea (8 pts.), headache (6 pts.), muscle weakness (3 pts.) and anorexia (5 pts.). Analysis of cells mobilized in 22 treatment cycles revealed massive mobilization: a 29-fold increase in WBC, 41-fold in absolute blasts and 77-fold in granulocytes. Increases in the numbers of circulating stem/progenitor cells: CD34+: 231-fold, CD34+/38-: 90-, CD34+/38-/123+(LSC): 148-, CXCR4+: 139-, VLA-4+: 68- and CD44+: 82-fold. Increase in circulating LSC was positively correlated with baseline blasts and VLA4 levels, but not with baseline CXCR4. Serial FISH analyses confirmed the preferential mobilization of leukemic vs. non-leukemic cells and 10-color flow cytometry demonstrated altered levels of pERK and pAKT but not of pSTAT3 in mobilized cells. Surprisingly, CXCR4 levels in mobilized cells were increased. CyTOF analysis of up to 29 parameters documented mobilization of primitive LSC. Conclusions: The combination of G-CSF+Plerixafor appears superior in increasing the number of circulating leukemic blasts and stem/progenitor cells in FLT3-ITD AML, as compared to Plerixafor alone in R/R AML(blast increase 2.1-fold; Uy et al. Blood, 2012). Treatment resulted in 4/13 CR and CRp and 6/13 PRs, for an overall response rate of 77%. Mobilized stem/progenitor cells displayed altered MAPK/AKT signaling and increased CXCR4 expression. This is the first clinical study of G-CSF/Plerixafor for the “mobilization” of AML cells, aimed at removing them from their protective bone marrow microenvironment and the initial results are providing proof-of–concept and encouraging clinical responses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine in AML. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Genzyme: Research Funding.

7028 Background: Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and uptake sensitizes AML blasts to chemotherapy (Blood 104: 1816, 2004). A prior Phase 1 study demonstrated the safety of high dose pravastatin given with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with AML and also reported an encouraging response rate (Blood 109: 2999, 2007). SWOG S0919 therefore evaluated the complete remission (CR) rate in a larger number of pts with relapsed AML treated with the pravastatin dose arrived at in the Phase 1 trial. Methods: Pts were treated at SWOG institutions from Aug 2009 through Nov 2012. Pravastatin was supplied by Bristol-Meyers Squibb. The protocol was approved by each institution’s review board. Eligibility: age ≥ 18 yrs, relapsed AML, cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 45%, CR/ CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) following most recent chemotherapy lasting ≥ 3 months, no prior hematopoietic cell transplant. Treatment: oral pravastatin 1280 mg Days 1-8, idarubicin 12 mg/m2/d IV Days 4-6, and cytarabine 1.5 g/m2/d continuous IV infusion Days 4-7. Pts achieving a CR could receive 2 cycles of consolidation. CR and CRi were defined by IWG criteria. Fifty eligible pts were to be accrued. If ≥ 21 pts achieved CR or CRi, the regimen would be considered sufficiently effective (critical level = 4.8% if true CR rate = 30% and power of 90% if true CR rate = 50%). Results: The study closed to accrual on Nov 1, 2012 after meeting the defined criterion for a positive study. Thirty-six pts with a median age of 59 yr (range 23-78) were enrolled. Seventeen pts (47%) were male and the median WBC was 2800/ uL (range 700-110,600). The median time from initial dx to registration was 18 mo (range 5-136). Relapse status: 1st: 17 pts (47%), 2nd: 15 (42%), 3rd: 2 (5.5%), and 4th: 2 (5.5%). Eighteen pts have died, 3 during treatment. The response rate was 75% (95% CI 58-88%; 20 CR, 7 CRi); and the median overall survival was 10 mo. The p-value comparing 75% to 30% (null response rate) is 3.356 x 10-8. Duration of last CR (≤ 6 months) and prior high dose cytarabine exposure did not affect response to protocol treatment. Conclusions: The CR/ CRi in this relapsed population is encouraging. We plan to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in higher-risk patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00840177.

Introduction: The only cure for sickle cell disease (SCD) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) although autologous HSCT of genetically engineered hematopoietic stem cells is promising. Lack of suitable matched related donors (MRD) is a major limitation driving interest in improving outcomes using unrelated donors. While excellent outcomes are achieved with non-myeloablative MRD HSCT in adults (Hsieh et al, 2009 and 2014), results from matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT have been limited by excessive graft versus host disease (GVHD) and treatment-related mortality (Shenoy et al, 2016). Here we present updated follow up of our institutional experience using MUD and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) in comparison to patients with MRD. Methods: Eligibility for HSCT included frequent pain crises requiring hospitalization and evidence of end-organ damage. Non-myeloablative conditioning with alemtuzumab and 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) was used for MRD HSCT (n=7), whereas patients without an MRD were transplanted using MUD, MMUD or haploidentical grafts (n=6) on a previously reported institutional protocol after conditioning with alemtuzumab (54 mg/m2), fludarabine (180 mg/m2), and melphalan (140 mg/m2), using a CD34+ selected graft with CD3+ cell add back. MRD recipients received sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis. Non-MRD recipients initially received tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis (n=1) but subsequently received sirolimus (n=5) due to the first patient developing posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). All grafts were G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts and all patients underwent RBC exchange to achieve Hgb S <30%. Data is reported using n (%) or median (range) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Results: Median follow up is 21.7 months (range 4.7 - 63.4). Median age for MRD recipients was 28.7 (21.4 - 35.5) years and 22.8 (18.5 - 34.6) for non-MRD recipients. Of note, the MRD group included one patient with a renal allograft from the same donor and another with stage V renal disease awaiting a kidney transplant. All patients where homozygous for hemoglobin S except one who had hemoglobin Sβo -thalassemia in the MRD group, and another heterozygous for hemoglobin S and C in the non-MRD group. Patients in the MRD group received unmanipulated grafts with a median of 14 (6.2 - 16.9) x 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg. Non-MRD recipients received CD34 - selected grafts with a median of 7.8 (4.1 - 15.1) x 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg with 2.2 x 10E5 (0.1 - 2.5) CD3+ cells add back. No growth factors were used post-transplant. All patient engrafted with no cases of graft failure. Median time to engraftment was significantly longer for the MRD group at 25 (22 - 30) vs 19 (13 - 21) days, p=0.003. Two patients in the MRD group developed acute/late acute GVHD (2 grade II), and 3 patients in the non-MRD group (1 grade II, 2 grade III), 2 of which developed in while switching immune suppression due to PRES. All GVHD cases were steroid responsive and resolved. Three patients in the non-MRD group developed PRES and none in the MRD group. There were no cases of treatment related mortality and all patients are alive and free of SCD. As both groups received alemtuzumab, and the non-MRD group received a CD34-selected graft, we examined lymphocyte subset reconstitution at day 100 and 1 year post-HSCT. The most striking difference was in median CD8+ T cell counts at day +100 which were lower in the non-MRD group approaching significance [101 (43 - 2995) vs 6.5 (3 - 2233) cells/uL, p=0.055, for the MRD and non-MRD respectively]. CD8+ T-cell counts were not significantly different at 1 year [402 (184 - 1066) vs 774 (143 - 1002) cells/uL, p<0.99]. Results from other lymphocyte subsets including CD4+ T-cells, NK cells and B cells are shown in table 1 and were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Of note, early donor T-cell chimerism at D100 was not significantly different between MRD and non-MRD groups [27.0 (18.0 - 50.0) % vs 37.5 (3.0 - 80.0) %, p=0.83] whereas at 1-year, MRD group donor T cell chimerism was significantly lower [53.5 (17.0 - 65.0) % vs 82.7 (69 - 90), p=0.01]. Conclusion: We demonstrate excellent outcomes with 100% survival and no graft rejection following matched and mismatched unrelated donor HSCT for adult patients with severe SCD. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results and further delineate the impact of T-cell subset reconstitution on early-post transplant complications. Disclosures Assal: Incyte corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; boston biomedical: Consultancy. Bhatia:BMS: Consultancy; Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bhutani:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lentzsch:Abbvie: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as anti-amyloid strategy; Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy. Reshef:Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: In Chuvash polycythemia (CP) (Problemi Gematologii I Perelivaniya Krovi 1974, 10:30), impaired degradation of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α from a homozygous germline VHLR200W mutation leads to augmented hypoxic responses during normoxia (Nat Genet 2002, 32:614). In addition to elevated hematocrit, CP is marked by leg varices, benign vertebral hemangiomas, decreased systemic blood pressure, increased systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and by the defining phenotypes of thrombosis and early mortality (Blood 2004, 103:3924; Haematologica 2012, 97:193). There is no effective therapy. While phlebotomy has been recommended for idiopathic polycythemia by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (Br J Haematol 2005, 130:174) and is administered to some CP patients, its benefits are unknown. Phlebotomy-induced iron deficiency inhibits PHD2 enzyme, the principal negative regulator of HIFs, which further augments hypoxic responses. This affects the transcription of many genes (BCMD 2014, 52:35). Hypoxia-regulated IRAK1 is augmented in inflammation and may promote thrombosis (Circ Res. 2013, 112:103). Methods: 165 patients with CP were enrolled in a registry between 2001 and 2009 after providing written informed consent. Survival analysis was used to examine the predictors of new thrombosis and death during the follow-up period. mRNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was profiled by Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST Array in 42 of the subjects. Results: The median age at enrollment was 35 years and 90 participants were females, 25 had a history of one thrombosis, 5 of two thromboses and 3 of three thromboses. In the year prior to study entry, 72 had received phlebotomy therapy (Table 1). In July 2015 the median follow-up was 9.0 years (range 1-14.5). During this follow-up period, 30 (18.2%) participants had one new thrombosis, 6 (3.6%) had two new thromboses and 17 (10.3%) died. The median age of death was 55 years (range 16-76) and deaths were related to thrombotic cerebrovascular accident (n = 4), myocardial infarction (n = 4), mesenteric or portal vein thrombosis (n = 3), other major thromboembolic events (n = 2) and trauma or unknown cause (n = 2). Baseline characteristics of older age, prior thrombosis, pentoxifylline treatment, smoking and splenomegaly were independently associated with greater thrombosis risk during follow-up (P < 0.003). After adjustment for these variables, the estimated probability of new thrombosis at 10 years was 26% in those receiving phlebotomies compared to 12% in those not phlebotomized (log rank P = 0.014) (Figure 1). There was also a trend for increased risk of death with phlebotomy: estimated probability 8.7% versus 3.7% (P = 0.15). Examination of gene transcripts affecting thrombosis by logistic regression identified 12 protective and 16 risk genes at 5% false discovery rate. Upregulation of two mRNAs was of singular significance: 1) IL1RAP, a proximal signaling adaptor of IRAK1 (Immunity 1997, 7: 837) and 2) THBS1, encoding thrombospondin1 (Blood 2015, 125: 399). Both genes have known roles in thrombosis promotion and we previously reported that THBS1 is upregulated in CP (BCMD 2014, 52:35). Further analysis revealed a further upregulation of THBS1 in patients with baseline history of phlebotomy (β=0.41, P=0.046). Conclusion: These findings underscore a high rate of thrombosis and death in patients with CP and reveal a potential role of increased IRAK1/IL1RAP signaling in these complications. They raise the possibility that phlebotomy therapy has a detrimental rather than beneficial effect, possibly contributed to by increased THBS1 expression. Table 1. Baseline characteristics by phlebotomy in the year prior to enrollment. Results in median (interquartile range) or n (%); four without phlebotomy data. No phlebotomy N=89 Received phlebotomy N=72 Age (years) 32 (18-48) 37 (26-49) 0.08 Female gender, n (%) 52 (58%) 34 (47%) 0.16 Smoking, n (%) 18 (20%) 24 (33%) 0.060 History of thrombosis, n (%) 20 (23%) 12 (17%) 0.4 Splenomegaly, n (%) 2 (2.3%) 2 (2.8%) 0.8 ASA treatment, n (%) 27 (30%) 36 (50%) 0.011 Pentoxifylline, n (%) 7 (7.9%) 17 (23.6%) 0.005 BMI (kg/m2) 20.4 (18.3-22.9) 21.6 (19.9-24.6) 0.010 Systolic BP (mm Hg) 109 (100-123) 118 (105-124) 0.6 Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 76 (68-84) 78 (71-83) 0.8 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 18.1 (16.4-21.0) 17.9 (16.0-19.8) 0.5 WBC (per uL) 5.7 (4.6-7.0) 5.5 (4.6-6.7) 0.9 Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: High dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) are considered standard of care as first line therapy in mantle cell lymphoma (Dreyling et al., 2005; Geisler et al., 2012) and in first line refractory and chemosensitive relapse Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) (Philip et al., 1995) . The development of hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) (Sorror et al., 2009) for recipient selection and transplant risk evaluation have impacted on patient selection. Over the last decade, most transplant program have seen an increase in the median age of AHCT recipients(McCarthy et al., 2013). Limited data are available to optimise elderly patients selection for transplantation while minimising the risk of treatment related toxicity and mortality (TRM). The goal of this study was to identify factors impacting the safety and efficacy of AHCT in the elderly NHL patients in order to better select those who will benefit from this intervention. Method: This is a single center, retrospective study examining outcomes of AHCT in elderly patients (≥60 years old) with NHL. Between January 1st, 2008 and January 1st, 2015, 90 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients signed an informed consent and the ethics committee of our institution approved the study. Progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to age at time of transplantation, HCT-CI, lymphoma histology and disease status at time of transplant. Toxicities were analyzed according to age and HCT-CI. Results: Median age at time of NHL diagnostic was 60 years (range 42 to 68) and 63 years at time of transplant (range 60 to 69). One third (33%) of our cohort was ≥65 years old. Histologic sub-type was mainly composed of follicular (36%), mantle cell (20%) and large B-cell lymphoma (38%). 50% of patients had high-risk disease and 31% had low risk disease. HCT-CI was low-risk in 34%, intermediate risk in 40% and high-risk disease in 26%. BEAM/BEAC conditioning regimen was used in 94%. The median graft CD34+/kg cell dose infused was 4.87. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days (range 8 to 14 days) and platelet recovery was 16 days (range 11 to 43 days). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 92% with 2% admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) with no difference between patients younger or ≥65 years old. Our cohort received a median of 8 days of antibiotics (range 0 to 41 days). Absolute lymphocyte count < 0,3 X 103 cells/uL at 14 days after transplant was associated with higher incidence of septic choc (p=0,024) and ICU admission (p=0,034). Age ≥65 year was not associated with an increase TRM and was surprisingly associated with less total parenteral nutrition (p=0,046) and narcotics uses (P=0,011). The median length of stay was 26 days. The median follow-up was 27 months (range, 1 to 87), median PFS of 46 months (Confidence Interval (CI); 95%, 24,4-67,6) (graph 1) and OS not reached (graph 2). The estimated 5 years OS is 62% and PFS is 40%. Transplant related mortality (TRM) was only 1% at 100 days and 2% at 1year after transplant. The only 2 patients who died from TRM died from cardiac arrest (1 month) and from an unknown cause (3 months). The 1-year progression rate was 30% (graph 3) and mortality rate only 12%. Progressive disease status following first line therapy was associated with a worse PFS compared to the achievement of a complete remission (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2,77; CI 95%, 1,18; 6,49). Progressive disease status at time of transplant was also associated with a lower PFS (HR 9,30: CI 95% 2,55 to 33,92) and OS (HR 13,44: CI 95% 2,68 to 67,48). HCT-CI score did not correlate with OS. International Prognostic Index (IPI), age and treatment type did not influence PFS or OS. Surprisingly, HCT-CI score did not correlate with toxicities, morbidity or mortality. Conclusion: In this single center retrospective study of elderly patients with NHL, AHCT was proven to be safe and effective. Progressive disease at the time of transplant was associated with worse PFS and OS. HCT-CI did not allow the categorization of patients in different prognostics group. Lymphocyte count at day 14 could identify patients at significant risk of complications. Our data suggest that age alone should not exclude patients from transplantation. However, HDT and AHCT should be reserved to chemosensitive patients and avoided in the elderly patient with progressive disease. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.