Relevant bibliographies by topics / Pain Self-management

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Pain Self-management'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 3 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Pain Self-management.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Pain Self-management"

1

Damush, T. M., K. Kroenke, M. J. Bair, J. Wu, W. Tu, E. E. Krebs, and E. Poleshuck. "Pain self-management training increases self-efficacy, self-management behaviours and pain and depression outcomes." European Journal of Pain 20, no. 7 (February 5, 2016): 1070–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.830.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mann, Elizabeth G., Sandra LeFort, and Elizabeth G. VanDenKerkhof. "Self-management interventions for chronic pain." Pain Management 3, no. 3 (May 2013): 211–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pmt.13.9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gustavsson, Catharina, Eva Denison, and Lena von Koch. "Self-Management of Persistent Neck Pain." Spine 36, no. 25 (December 2011): 2105–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3182028b04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Taylor, Stephanie JC, Dawn Carnes, Kate Homer, Tamar Pincus, Brennan C. Kahan, Natalia Hounsome, Sandra Eldridge, et al. "Improving the self-management of chronic pain: COping with persistent Pain, Effectiveness Research in Self-management (COPERS)." Programme Grants for Applied Research 4, no. 14 (September 2016): 1–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/pgfar04140.

Full text
Abstract:
BackgroundChronic musculoskeletal pain is a common problem that is difficult to treat. Self-management support interventions may help people to manage this condition better; however, there is limited evidence showing that they improve clinical outcomes. Our overarching research question was ‘Does a self-management support programme improve outcomes for people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain?’.AimTo develop, evaluate and test the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a theoretically grounded self-management support intervention for people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain.MethodsIn phase 1 we carried out two systematic reviews to synthesise the evidence base for self-management course content and delivery styles likely to help those with chronic pain. We also considered the psychological theories that might underpin behaviour change and pain management principles. Informed by these data we developed the Coping with persistent Pain, Evaluation Research in Self-management (COPERS) intervention, a group intervention delivered over 3 days with a top-up session after 2 weeks. It was led by two trained facilitators: a health-care professional and a layperson with experience of chronic pain. To ensure that we measured the most appropriate outcomes we reviewed the literature on potential outcome domains and measures and consulted widely with patients, tutors and experts. In a feasibility study we demonstrated that we could deliver the COPERS intervention in English and, to increase the generalisability of our findings, also in Sylheti for the Bangladeshi community. In phase 2 we ran a randomised controlled trial to test the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding the COPERS intervention to a best usual care package (usual care plus a relaxation CD and a pain toolkit leaflet). We recruited adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain largely from primary care and musculoskeletal physiotherapy services in two localities: east London and Coventry/Warwickshire. We collected follow-up data at 12 weeks (self-efficacy only) and 6 and 12 months. Our primary outcome was pain-related disability (Chronic Pain Grade disability subscale) at 12 months. We also measured costs, health utility (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions), anxiety, depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)], coping, pain acceptance and social integration. Data on the use of NHS services by participants were extracted from NHS electronic records.ResultsWe recruited 703 participants with a mean age of 60 years (range 19–94 years); 81% were white and 67% were female. Depression and anxiety symptoms were common, with mean HADS depression and anxiety scores of 7.4 [standard deviation (SD) 4.1] and 9.2 (SD 4.6), respectively. Intervention participants received 85% of the course content. At 12 months there was no difference between treatment groups in our primary outcome of pain-related disability [difference –1.0 intervention vs. control, 95% confidence interval (CI) –4.9 to 3.0]. However, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, pain acceptance and social integration all improved more in the intervention group at 6 months. At 1 year these differences remained for depression (–0.7, 95% CI –1.2 to –0.2) and social integration (0.8, 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2). The COPERS intervention had a high probability (87%) of being cost-effective compared with usual care at a threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.ConclusionsAlthough the COPERS intervention did not affect our primary outcome of pain-related disability, it improved psychological well-being and is likely to be cost-effective according to current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criteria. The COPERS intervention could be used as a substitute for less well-evidenced (and more expensive) pain self-management programmes. Effective interventions to improve hard outcomes in chronic pain patients, such as disability, are still needed.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN22714229.FundingThe project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 4, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lutfiandini, Cherlys Tin, Tiyas Kusumaningrum, and Ni Ketut Alit Armini. "Pain Self-management in Adolescent with Dysmenorrhea." Pediomaternal Nursing Journal 6, no. 2 (July 1, 2020): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/pmnj.v6i2.14392.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: Complaints that often occur are dysmenorrhea that is not harmful but can interfere with comfort and activity. An adolescent who know the proper management of dysmenorrhea can overcome it and have good pain management. The study aimed to analyze pain self-management in adolescents with dysmenorrhoea.Methods: This study used correlational research with a cross-sectional approach. The population in this study were adolescent at Public Junior High School IV Lamongan. The samples were 129 respondents selected by simple random sampling. The inclusion criteria were an adolescent who analyzes dysmenorrhea. The exclusion criteria for this study were not in place due to illness or alpha. Data was collected using questionnaire self-efficacy, decision making, information support, and pain self-management that had been tested for validity and reliability—test statistics using the Spearman's rho test.Results: The results of the study found a correlation between self-efficacy with pain self-management (p = 0.004; r = 0.24), decision making with pain self-management (p = 0.003; r = 0.26), information support with pain self-management (p = 0.003; r = 0.26).Conclusion: Self-efficacy is a mediator to improve pain self-management optimally to improve quality of life. There are three factors in decision making for pain management in adolescents who experience dysmenorrhea is personal, social, and psychological. Adolescents who have initiatives in finding information about dysmenorrhea have good pain management. It is expected that parents, schools, and health workers provide knowledge to an adolescent who experiences dysmenorrhea to be able to do pain management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kawi, Jennifer, Andrew Thomas Reyes, and Rogelio A. Arenas. "Exploring Pain Management Among Asian Immigrants with Chronic Pain: Self-Management and Resilience." Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 21, no. 5 (September 4, 2018): 1123–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0820-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Moffett, Jennifer Klaber. "Back pain: encouraging a self-management approach." Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 18, no. 4 (January 2002): 205–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593980290058571.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ring, H. C., P. Theut Riis, I. M. Miller, D. M. Saunte, and G. B. Jemec. "Self-reported pain management in hidradenitis suppurativa." British Journal of Dermatology 174, no. 4 (January 6, 2016): 909–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14266.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Blyth, Fiona M. "Pain Self-Management-One Meaning for All?" Pain Medicine 15, no. 2 (February 2014): 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pme.12341.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fan, Zu-Yan, Jin-Xiang Lin, Xing Li, Xiang-Wei Chen, and Xiu-Yan Huang. "The effect of pain self-management based on pain control diary on breakthrough pain." Journal of Clinical Oncology 35, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2017): 10107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.10107.

Full text
Abstract:
10107 Background: Most patients suffer from cancer pain, especially breakthrough pain. The overall incidence of breakthrough pain is estimated to be 65%. Self-management makes patients actively participating in the use of drugs, transforming their roles and adjusting their moods in order to better cure their own diseases. Therefore, the aim of the study is to discuss the effect of reducing cancer pain patients' breakthrough pain through self-management based on pain control diary. Methods: From October, 2015 to October, 2016, a total of 200 patients treated with opioids for cancer pain were randomly divided into groups. Patients in the control group were given general management including the Standard "the three steps analgesic ladder treatment for cancer pain", the traditional form of health education and psychological care; While the intervention group in addition to conventional cancer pain management, self-management based on pain control diary was applied. Through repeated intensive training, patients learned how to do self-assessment, to master the feature of their own pain, problem-solving skills and formal report to their oncologists in charge. Results: After six weeks of intervention , 10% patients in the intervention group had suffer breakthrough pain compared with 54% patients in the control group (P < 0.05). The whole processing management model is a whole process, specialization and humanization Care model for patients with advanced cancer pain management, can effectively improve patient medication compliance, reduce the cancer breakthrough pain's incidence, improve the patients,s life quality with cancer pain. The medication compliance of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group(X2= 46.606, P<0.001), and in intervention group the incidence of breakthrough pain was significantly lower than that of the control group (X2= 44.148, P<0.001) Conclusions: The self management based on pain control diary is a whole process, specialization and humanization Care model for patients with advanced cancer pain management, can effectively improve patient medication compliance, reduce the cancer breakthrough pain's incidence, improve the patients's life quality with cancer pain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Pain Self-management"

1

Appleyard, Sara Elizabeth. "Self-management of cancer pain." Thesis, University of Hull, 2014. http://hydra.hull.ac.uk/resources/hull:11347.

Full text
Abstract:
The portfolio has three parts: a systematic literature review, an empirical study and a set of appendices. Part one: Comprises a systematic literature review in which studies relating to the use of self-initiated pain coping strategies in adults with cancer are reviewed. Fifteen studies were included in the review, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods designs. The studies reviewed had to have explored pain coping strategies and have included patient characteristics such as demographic, psychological or clinical variables that would allow for the investigation of possible relationships between the two. Part two: Comprises an empirical paper which explores the experiences of older people who self-manage their cancer pain at home. Patients attended semi-structured interviews with the main researcher. These interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). The data was analysed, emergent themes are presented and implications are discussed in regard to existing literature. Methodological limitations are discussed and potential areas for future research are identified. Part three: Comprises the appendices which support the work of the first two parts, and includes a reflective statement on the research process, an epistemological statement, and a worked example of IPA analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hernandez, Carlos, and Marion Slack. "Self-management of Pain Among Pharmacy Students." The University of Arizona, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/613984.

Full text
Abstract:
Class of 2016 Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine if pharmacy students are more likely to use pharmacological agents to manage pain and if men and women are equally likely to use pharmacological agents. Methods: Questionnaires were administered after a regularly scheduled class for first, second and third year pharmacy students. Data collected included a pain intensity rating, whether pain was acute or chronic, how the pain was managed (medication, exercise, etc.) and if pain interfered with activities. Results: A total of 218 students (41% men, 71% aged 19-25) participated; 70% reported acute pain, 16%, chronic pain, and 14%, no pain. Pain intensity was greater in the chronic pain group (5.8 ± 1.7) than in the acute pain group (5.0 ± 2.1; p = 0.028). Chronic pain respondents were more likely to use prescription NSAIDs, muscle relaxers, physical therapy, transdermal electrical nerve stimulation, steroid injections and beta blockers (p < 0.02). There were few differences between men and women; women used OTC NSAIDs and acetaminophen at higher rates than men (p < 0.02). Women also used two non-pharmacological strategies (changed position and relaxation) at higher levels than men (p < 0.02). Students with chronic pain reported more pain interference with daily and leisure activities (p < 0.005) and work (p = 0.003) than students in the acute pain group. Conclusions: Different strategies were used for pain management between acute and chronic pain participants, and also between both men and women. Students with chronic pain reported more interference with activities than those with acute pain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Azaril, Kim, Taness Billington, and Kelsey Garlick. "The Efficacy of Self-Management Programs for Chronic Pain: A Preliminary Review." The University of Arizona, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624024.

Full text
Abstract:
Class of 2017 Abstract
Objectives: To identify studies that have been conducted on pain self-management interventions to describe the strategies used in the treatment of pain Methods: Eligible studies were determined using a study inclusion-screening tool. To be eligible, studies needed to be randomized controlled trials comparing some type of self-management intervention to an alternative or usual care. Once determined to be eligible, selected studies were analyzed by two investigators using a consensus procedure and full article data extraction form which collected data on the study characteristics, patient characteristics, self-management strategies and relevant study outcomes. Results: The chronic pain management strategies from the 14 randomized controlled trials used in this study included: acupuncture, mobile based intervention, yoga, meditation/relaxation techniques, cupping therapy, musical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy and self-management therapies. All studies showed a statistically significant reduction in pain from baseline, however, the effect size ranged from very small (0.02) to quite large (2.2). Conclusions: Most studies showed a meaningful reduction in pain, hence, a wide variety of self-management strategies are available for managing pain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Giannopoulou, Chrysoula. "Effectiveness of an Internet-based pain self-management intervention for individuals living with chronic pain." Thesis, Queen Margaret University, 2015. https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/7728.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Chronic pain is a prevalent healthcare problem which influences each aspect of an individual’s life. A biopsychosocial approach is the dominant one to be taken in the understanding and treatment of chronic pain as not only physical but also psychological factors influence the pain experience. Multi-disciplinary interventions based on a biopsychosocial approach provide an effective treatment strategy for the management of chronic pain. However, the availability of these interventions is limited. Research indicates that internet-based self-management interventions can address this limitation. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an internet-based pain self-management intervention, for individuals with chronic pain that were recruited from various clinical settings. The intervention is a well-known pain self-management website known as the ‘pain toolkit’. This is the first study that we are aware of which examines the effectiveness of the ‘pain toolkit’ intervention in a ‘real-world’ clinical context. It was hypothesised that the participants’ fear of movement/(re)injury, pain-related anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain (intensity and interference) and passive coping strategies (i.e. diverting attention, catastrophizing, praying/hoping) would decrease after engagement with the ‘pain toolkit’ website. Moreover, it was hypothesised that the participants’ self-efficacy and active coping strategies (i.e. reinterpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, ignoring pain sensations, increasing activity level, the ability to decrease pain and to control pain) would increase after engagement with the ‘pain toolkit’ website. Finally, it was hypothesised that the participants’ readiness to engage in pain self-management would increase from the onset to the completion of the intervention. Specifically, engagement with the ‘pain toolkit’ intervention would facilitate participants’ movement into a more advanced stage of pain self-management. Methodology: Self-report questionnaires, including: Pain Stage of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), Brief Pain Inventory (Short-Form: BPI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) were completed by the participants - both before and after the intervention. Participants engaged with the intervention for 6 weeks. Results: Forty-eight chronic pain patients (27 females and 21 males) aged 22 to 77 completed the study. Participants showed significant reductions in pain related anxiety, fear of movement/(re)injury, and pain catastrophizing and there was significant improvement in their ability to decrease pain. Conclusion: These findings indicate that internet-based, pain self-management intervention, such as the ‘pain toolkit’ is an effective intervention on a variety of measures for individuals living with chronic pain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bemis, Lola, Bonita Harper, and Sima Molla-Hosseini. "Self-Management Strategies for Chronic Pain Reported in Population-Based Surveys: A Systematic Review." The University of Arizona, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624027.

Full text
Abstract:
Class of 2017 Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the types of management strategies reported by individuals with chronic pain to manage chronic pain, the average number of strategies used, outcomes, and side effects. Methods: To be included in the systematic review, reports of population surveys of adult patients with chronic pain, as defined by the authors, had to be published in English, include chronic pain from any cause, and include information on the treatment strategies used by respondents. Search terms included “pain,” “self-care,” “self management,” “self treatment,” and “adult” and the search strategy included systematic searches of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, searches of reference lists, and citation searches as well as key websites such as the CDC and NIH. Results: A total of 13 study reports were identified. Sample size ranged from 103 to 4839; mean age ranged from 42 to 81 and 51 to 69% female. All reports included information on medications used to manage pain; 6 reported other medical strategies; 9 reported physical strategies; 6 reported psychological strategies; and 11 reported non- medical strategies. Only 4 studies reported some data on the number of strategies used; one study reported 23% used 6 or more medications, another reported 51% used 3 or more strategies. Six studies reported some type of outcome; including inadequate control of pain (40%) or good relief (87%), and 36% as effective in a third study. Few side effects were reported; two studies reported constipation, nausea and vomiting. Conclusions: Population-based surveys of chronic pain have identified a large number of strategies used to manage pain, however they provide little information on the average number of strategies used, the effectiveness of the strategies, or resulting side effects.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Morden, Andrew William. "Exploring 'risk' and self-management in relation to chronic joint pain." Thesis, Keele University, 2013. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602981.

Full text
Abstract:
Chronic joint pain, specifically knee pain, is a prevalent disabling chronic condition. Policy and clinical guidelines promote education of risk factors and supported self-management to ameliorate predicted demands upon state, society and the individual. Extant literature offers little insight into if and how 'risk' is understood in relation to chronic joint pain. The broad research questions in this thesis ask: do people have knowledge of risk factors for joint pain? How do people conceptualise or experience risk in relation to joint pain? How does risk relate to self-management? Qualitative methodology is used within this study. An interpretive approach is used to explore and understand participants sense making and experiences in relation to the concept of risk. Fifteen participants took part in two in-depth interviews spaced six months apart. Eight of the participants also took part in a diary study between the interviews. Findings reveal that lay explanations about jOint pain, lived experiences of illness, meaning making about the body and subsequent learned strategies to deal with joint pain mirror clinical perspectives of 'risk'. People with joint pain encounter 'risk' as a threat to biography or as hazardous scenarios related to their social environment. Self-management of symptoms is mediated by subjective and socio-contextual factors relating to embodied experiences of pain and lay sense making about how physiology interacts with motion and weight loss. Self-management in relation to 'risk' is about managing threats to self, obligations to others, and hazardous scenarios as well as symptom control. New insights for understanding risk are suggested, taking into account the epistemological, ontological and material elements of people's lives with chronic joint pain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Buck, Rhiannon. "Naturally occurring attentional strategies in the self-management of cancer pain." Thesis, University of Leeds, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.410931.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Adem, Ahmed. "Exploring self-management of chronic low back pain in Saudi Arabia." Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, 2017. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19155/.

Full text
Abstract:
Aim: The main purpose of this research project is to explore both patients’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions and understanding of self-management for chronic low back pain (CLBP) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and moreover, to explore current physiotherapy practice for managing CLBP in KSA. Methods: This research project used a mixed methods approach with sequential designs. The first section contains a quantitative study and the second section includes two qualitative studies. The quantitative section allowed exploration of current physiotherapy practices for CLBP management using a large population. The qualitative section has provided a more in-depth understanding of both patients' and physiotherapists' perceptions in regards to self-management and physiotherapy management for CLBP. Results: In the current study, physiotherapists acknowledged the importance of exercise and advice. Moreover, these represented the most common treatment methods used in daily practice. However, patients’ preferences for passive approaches, such as rest, massage and modalities were frequently reported. This shows conflict between physiotherapists and patients with CLBP in terms of the preferred approach for managing the disorder. Physiotherapists’ extensive use of modalities where evidence of effectiveness was lacking or insufficient was a common practice for physiotherapy management in patients with CLBP in the current research project. Moreover, physiotherapists and patients showed limited understanding of self-management as a concept. Conclusion: Promoting self-management in daily physiotherapy practice appears to be a complex issue. It involves various factors, such as promoting an evidence-based practice culture among physiotherapists; a patient-centred approach; access to guidelines and evidence; and organisational support through developing policy, local guidelines and CPD training. This research presents a platform of recommendations for future researchers, professionals, educators and policymakers to enhance the quality of care for patients with CLBP in the KSA in general and may increase the adoption of self-management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Liang, Shu-Yuan. "Opioid-taking self-efficacy in Taiwanese Outpatients with cancer pain." Queensland University of Technology, 2007. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16516/.

Full text
Abstract:
Despite the fact that as many as 80-90% of patients with cancer pain can be effectively treated using pharmacological therapies and other advanced approaches, 31% to 85% of cancer patients in Taiwan still experience varying levels of pain. Pain is one of the symptoms that patients fear most; it overwhelms all aspects of patients' lives and creates a sense of uncertainly and hopelessness. Pain control is, therefore, a high priority in the treatment of cancer patients. Pharmacological therapy is the cornerstone of cancer pain management. With the current trend toward outpatient care, many patients are being required to assume greater responsibility for self-management of prescribed analgesics at home to deal with the variable and complex nature of cancer pain and side effects of opioids. Patients however, have misconceptions regarding analgesics and a series of difficulties when attempting to put a pain management regimen into practice. This research addressed the hypothesis that self-efficacy beliefs might play an important role in analgesic adherence and pain experience in Taiwanese outpatients with cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to measure the self-efficacy expectations relating to opioid-taking in Taiwanese outpatients with cancer. Another purpose was to explore how opioid-taking self-efficacy and beliefs about opioid analgesics contribute to patients' analgesic adherence and pain experience in Taiwanese outpatients with cancer. In the first stage semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data from a purposeful sample (n=10) of oncology outpatients from two teaching hospitals in the Taipei area of Taiwan. The purpose of this phase was to identify behaviours and situational impediments associated with analgesic taking. Findings from this phase were used to develop a scale to measure opioid-taking self-efficacy. In the second stage a pilot test with a convenience sample (n=30) was conducted to test the validity and reliability of the new scale and to identify the feasibility of using the scale in a cross-sectional survey. In the third stage a cross-sectional survey was undertaken (n=92) to describe pain experiences, analgesic adherence, beliefs about opioid analgesics, and opioid-taking self-efficacy in Taiwanese outpatients with cancer and to explore how opioid-taking self-efficacy and beliefs about opioid analgesics contributed to analgesic adherence and pain experience. Results of this study highlight an important issue - under-treatment of cancer pain in this group of Taiwanese outpatients. As well, low adherence rates to opioid analgesics in cancer outpatients arose as an important issue in this study. A range of misconceptions about using opioids for pain was also common amongst the sample. Despite these misconceptions, patients reported being moderately confident in their ability to perform self-management behaviours related to their prescribed opioid-taking. Results of this research supported the notion that patients' self-efficacy in relation to taking their prescribed opioid regimen was a significant independent predictor of patients' adherence behaviour and pain relief, but not of pain severity. Beliefs about opioid analgesics were also an independent predictor of patients' adherence, but not of pain relief or pain severity. In addition, findings from this study provided support for the validity and reliability of the opioid-taking self-efficacy scale. Results suggested there is a need for systematic assessment of beliefs affecting patients' opioid adherence behaviours for cancer pain control, including perceived personal self-efficacy and beliefs about opioid analgesics. Educational programs that focus on overcoming patients' misconceptions (beliefs) about taking opioid analgesics may be particularly beneficial. In addition, this study advocates that conducting self-efficacy-enhancing interventions may improve medication adherence for patients and therefore pain relief. More research is needed to demonstrate the construct validity of the self-efficacy scale and to evaluate self-efficacy enhancing interventions in cancer pain management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Chavez, Ramon, Daniel Trinh, and de Dios Daniel Vergel. "Strategies Used by Pharmacists for the Self-Management of Acute and Chronic Pain: An On-Line Survey." The University of Arizona, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624165.

Full text
Abstract:
Class of 2017 Abstract
Objectives: Specific Aim 1: Pharmacist will use pharmacological pain self-management strategies over non- pharmacological strategies. Specific Aim 2: Pharmacist pain self-management strategies will differ based on whether or not the pharmacist has chronic pain. Specific Aim 3: Pharmacist pain self-management strategies will differ across age. Specific Aim 4: Pharmacist pain self-management strategies will differ across gender. Methods: A survey was sent to all pharmacists with an email address registered with the State Board of Pharmacy in a single Southwestern state. The survey asked about characteristics of pain, strategies for managing pain, outcomes, and demographics. The primary outcome was severity of pain after treatment. Results: Responses were received from 417 pharmacists; 219 reported acute, 206 reported chronic pain, and 55 reported no pain. The chronic pain group was more likely to have a disability with poor/fair health status (P<0.006) and to report higher levels of pain before treatment (6.9 versus 5.8). Both groups reported similar relief from all strategies (76% versus 78% ; P equals 0.397), but the chronic pain group reported higher levels of pain after treatment (3.2 versus 2.0), less confidence in pain management, and less satisfaction (P less than 0.004). Conclusions: Age and gender did not affect the use of specific pain management strategies or the amount of pain relief received from all strategies used by participants with either acute or chronic pain. However, participants with chronic pain had higher levels of pain before and after treatment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Pain Self-management"

1

Rodham, Karen. Self-Management for Persistent Pain. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48969-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

M, DeSio John, ed. Pain management: PreTest self-assessment and review. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division/PreTest Series, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

E, Gerber Kenneth, ed. Coping with chronic pain: A guide to patient self-management. New York: Guilford Press, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

1964-, Martin David P., and Moriarity Joseph, eds. Pain-free living for drug-free people: A guide to pain management in recovery. Center City, MN: Hazelden, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pain relief with trigger point self-help. New York, NY: North Atlantic Books, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Growing beyond emotional pain: Action plans for healing. San Luis Obispo, Calif: Impact Publishers, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

DeLaune, Valerie. Trigger point therapy for repetitive strain injury: Your self-treatment workbook for elbow, lower arm, wrist & hand pain. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

DeLaune, Valerie. Trigger point therapy for repetitive strain injury: Your self-treatment workbook for elbow, lower arm, wrist & hand pain. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McIlwain, Harris H. The pain-free back: 6 simple steps to end pain and reclaim your active life. New York: H. Holt, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Madeline, Gershwin, and Flinders Rick, eds. The RISE response: Illness, wellness, and spirituality : a proven program of relief for people coping with cancer, HIV, chronic pain, and tension. New York: Crossroad, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Pain Self-management"

1

Rodham, Karen. "Re-imagining Self-Management." In Self-Management for Persistent Pain, 73–92. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48969-4_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Shaw, William S., and Glenn Pransky. "Pain Self-Management at Work." In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, 1–2. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_101917-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shaw, William S., and Glenn Pransky. "Pain Self-Management at Work." In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, 1615–16. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_101917.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Christian, Desirae, and Jyoti Sachdeva. "Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Self-Management Interventions for Chronic Pain." In Pain, 381–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99124-5_84.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

McGillion, Michael, Sandra M. LeFort, Karen Webber, and Jennifer N. Stinson. "Pain Self-Management: Theory and Process for Clinicians." In Clinical Pain Management, 191–99. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444329711.ch23.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Diener, Ina. "Self-Management and Low Back Pain." In Self-Management in Chronic Illness, 75–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69736-5_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Rodham, Karen. "Self-Management: The Panacea for Coping with Persistent Pain?" In Self-Management for Persistent Pain, 1–17. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48969-4_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rodham, Karen. "Self-Management as Presented in Policy." In Self-Management for Persistent Pain, 19–32. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48969-4_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Rodham, Karen. "Self-Management in Practice: Mind the Gap." In Self-Management for Persistent Pain, 33–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48969-4_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rodham, Karen. "Why Pain Self-Management Might Result in the Blame, Shame and Inflame Game." In Self-Management for Persistent Pain, 53–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48969-4_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Pain Self-management"

1

Adams, Phil, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Michael Elfenbein, Elaine Wethington, and Geri Gay. "Supporting the Self-Management of Chronic Pain Conditions with Tailored Momentary Self-Assessments." In CHI '17: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025832.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Popert, Sheila, Agnes Csikos, Peter Moore, Chris Cutler, Alison Allsopp, Martin Hill, Sonia Chand, and Sandra Brown. "P-122 Enabling patients to self-manage their pain; a pilot of a modified pain management programme." In People, Partnerships and Potential, 16 – 18 November 2016, Liverpool. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001245.145.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Zhao, Hua, Yulin Guo, Airong Zhang, Ruihong Wu, Ruijuan Zhang, Linhua Yang, and Zhi-Guang Duan. "A Model for Pain Self-Management of Patients with Haemophilia: Peer Education." In 2013 International Conference on the Modern Development of Humanities and Social Science. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/mdhss-13.2013.48.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wilson, Marian, and Michele R. Shaw. "Gaining Insight and Taking Action: Engaging Adults with Persistent Pain and Opioid Use Disorder in an Online Pain Self-Management Program." In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.487.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wilson, Marian, and Michele Shaw. "“Focus on the Good” - Participant Perspectives after Engaging in an Online Pain Self-Management Program." In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.408.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ajimsha, Ms. "Effectiveness of Self Myofascial Release Technique in the Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain in Nursing Professionals." In Qatar Foundation Annual Research Conference Proceedings. Hamad bin Khalifa University Press (HBKU Press), 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qfarc.2016.hbpp1263.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Azizoddin, Desiree, Rosalind Adam, Daniela Kessler, and Andrea Enzinger. "Leveraging Mobile Health Technology and Multidisciplinary Methodology to Optimize Self-Management Education for Advanced Cancer Pain: Development of STAMP." In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.424.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Jönsson, TSJ, CA Thorstensson, E. Ekvall Hansson, and L. Dahlberg. "FRI0749-HPR The effect of a supported osteoarthritis self-management program on physical activity, pain, quality of life and self-efficacy. an intervention study with a reference group." In Annual European Congress of Rheumatology, 14–17 June, 2017. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.5711.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Parsons, LB, and J. Adams. "SAT0762-HPR The accessibility and usability of an australian web-based self-management programme (MYJOINTPAIN) for people with lower health literacy and joint pain in the uk." In Annual European Congress of Rheumatology, 14–17 June, 2017. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.1529.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Simons, Luuk PA. "Health 2050: bioinformatics for paid self-repair; a design for future quantified self." In Enabling Technology for a Sustainable Society. University of Maribor Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-362-3.17.

Full text
Abstract:
About 75% of our healthcare costs go to four domains (cardio-, onco-, neuro- and metabolic) of diseases which are largely preventable or even reversible. Instead, they are ‘managed’ and made chronic, not cured. This is very costly and unsustainable for the future. Research is showing new opportunities for enhancing our body’s self-repair in a matter of hours or days. We want to empower personal cure with rapid feedback for self-management. What could be an interventionand bio-feedback portfolio to promote health self-repair within hours or days? Using a cross-case design analysis, we found large differences across the four health domains regarding: intervention aims, (self-)measurement options, focus on symptoms vs causes, plus degree of attention for health selfmanagement. Given recent developments in rapid cure, we advise advanced daily bioinformatics feedback, instead of current quarterly cycles, to improve our self-repair effectiveness.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Pain Self-management"

1

Stephenson, L. D., and Ashok Kumar. Technology Demonstration of Self-Healing Coatings for In-Place Management of Lead-Based Paint Hazards. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada431145.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Swinson Evans, Tammeka, Suzanne West, Linda Lux, Michael Halpern, and Kathleen Lohr. Cancer Symptoms and Side Effects: A Research Agenda to Advance Cancer Care Options. RTI Press, July 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2017.rb.0016.1707.

Full text
Abstract:
Cancer survivors have unique physical, psychological, social, and spiritual health needs. These can include symptoms and side effects associated with cancer and cancer treatment, such as pain, cognitive dysfunction, insomnia, and elevated anxiety and depression. This research brief summarizes a landscape review done for the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) to develop a clear, comprehensive understanding of the state of research as of the mid-2000s. We conducted a targeted search strategy to identify projects funded by federal and commercial sources and the American Cancer Society (ACS) in addition to identifying funding opportunities released by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We conducted additional review to identify studies focused on symptom and side-effect measures and five priority topic areas (selected by PCORI prior to the review) in the following five databases (from January 2005- through September 2015) with an inclusion criteria in an adapted PICOTS framework (populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, time frames, and settings). We identified 692 unduplicated studies (1/2005 to 9/2015) and retained 189 studies about cancer symptom and side-effect management. Of these studies, NIH funded 40% and the ACS 33%. Academic institutions, health care systems, other government agencies, and private foundations or industry supported the remainder. We identified critical gaps in the knowledge base pertaining to populations, interventions, comparators (when those are relevant for comparative effectiveness reviews), and outcomes. We also discovered gaps in cross-cutting topics, particularly for patient decision-making studies, patient self-management of cancer symptoms and side effects, and coordinated care.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Pain Self-management' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography