To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Pardon.

Journal articles on the topic 'Pardon'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Pardon.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Shanor, Charles, and Marc Miller. "Pardon Us: Systematic Presidential Pardons." Federal Sentencing Reporter 13, no. 3-4 (February 2001): 139–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2000.13.3-4.139.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Murphy, Yoko. "Contextualizing opposition to pardons: Implications for pardon reform." Criminology & Criminal Justice 20, no. 1 (July 18, 2018): 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748895818787864.

Full text
Abstract:
Though pardons (record suspensions) have existed in Canada for over four decades, most reform to the pardon programme has occurred in the last decade. An experimental survey was conducted to understand whether providing basic information pertaining to crime and criminal behaviour would affect support for pardons in Canada. Generally, there was no relationship between responses to pardon-related questions and demographics (i.e. gender, age or education) or most other standard criminal justice-related questions. Responses to questions on three aspects of pardons (eligibility waiting times; submission fees; and automatic pardons) were not affected by whether or not the information condition was received. However, providing respondents with a small amount of information about sex offence recidivism did increase the acceptability of allowing those convicted of sex offences to receive pardons. These findings suggest that certain concerns regarding pardon accessibility could potentially be alleviated by presenting existing government data to the public.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bowman, Frank O. "Are Blanket Pardons Constitutional?" Federal Sentencing Reporter 33, no. 5 (June 1, 2021): 301–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2021.33.5.301.

Full text
Abstract:
The pardon power of the U.S. president is very broad. A president may pardon any federal crime committed prior to the date of the pardon, and may issue pardons to individuals or groups of persons for offenses committed in connection with multiple discrete events. However, the Constitution’s text and British and American precedent suggest that a valid pardon presupposes awareness by the President of that which is being pardoned as a logical and legal precondition for an exercise of judgment about the propriety of granting clemency. Accordingly, a pardon of the type issued by President Gerald Ford to former President Richard Nixon, purporting to pardon Nixon for all federal offenses committed during his terms of office, irrespective of Ford’s knowledge of them, should be deemed unconstitutional.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Quin, J. "Pardon?" BMJ 338, apr17 1 (April 17, 2009): b1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1277.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Monballyu, J. "The political responsibility for Royal pardons in Belgium during the 19th century (1830–1900)." Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review 75, no. 2 (2007): 153–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181907781352582.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn Belgium, the Royal Prerogative of pardoning convicted criminals was legally embedded in the Constitution of 14th February, 1831. It allowed the King to reduce a sentence or to grant a discharge of a sentence given by a court. Any Royal decision to pardon had, however, to be countersigned by a member of the Government, who took on the political responsibility of the decision towards Parliament. In most cases, the task fell upon the Minister of Justice. During the 19th century, in both Houses of the Belgian Parliament, the Minister of Justice was repeatedly questioned about the way the prerogative of pardoning was exercised. This usually occurred when a death sentence had been commuted to a lesser sentence. In such cases, members of the Chamber of Representatives or of the Senate would ask for an explicit justification of a particular pardon. Only exceptionally would a Government Minister be challenged about the legality of a decision either granting or refusing a pardon. Because of the constitutional convention which prevents exposing directly the political position of the King, Jules d'Anethan (Minister of Justice 1843–1847) defended the Minister's right to refuse to give any reasons for a decision regarding a pardon. He only acknowledged Parliament's right to question a Minister about his general policy on pardons. In his view, it was not within Parliament's powers to ask a Minister of Justice why a pardon had been granted or refused in a specific case. That view tended to limit considerably a Minister's responsibility for Royal pardons: it became no more than an empty shell. Another Minister of Justice, Théophile De Lantsheere (1871–1878), took an opposite view. He refused to state his general policy on pardons, but he accepted to explain the specific reasons why a Royal decision granting or refusing a pardon had been made. In his view, a pardon was in the first place a matter for the Minister's conscience. Parliament was therefore entitled to assess his particular actions. However, in the line of his predecessors' and successors' view, he believed that the reasons why the King had insisted on a pardon or refused to grant a pardon should not be mentioned to Parliament. Pardon was an issue between King and Government, not between King and Parliament. As the saying goes in Belgian constitutional law: The Crown should never be laid 'bare'.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hutchison, Emly J., and Sara McDougall. "Pardonable Sodomy: Uncovering Laurence’s Sin and Recovering the Range of the Possible." Medieval People 37 (2022): 115–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.32773/qofl5603.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper examines the 1405 pardon granted to a young married woman named Laurence who confessed to having had sex with another married woman in northern France. The pardon is unique in many respects. Most pardons are for men, and especially men who commit violent acts. This pardon defies all norms: it was granted to a woman, it seems to have been a pardon for consensual sex, and, finally, the sex was with another women. Given the focus of the narrative requesting royal grace, we have taken the position that this was likely a pardon for this sex, as a form of “sodomy,” an umbrella term for sex “against nature”, that is, non-reproductive, non-marital sex, though the pardon does not use the term (or any like it). Our inquiry, therefore, raises a number of critical questions. Most importantly is: why was there investigation, prosecution, and pardon? We seek to problematize every aspect of this problematically exceptional pardon. In so doing, we contribute to current scholarship in the field of queer medieval studies that calls for medievalists to shed their heteronormative lens when approaching complicated source documents that offer a window to us on medieval practices of and attitudes towards extra-marital sex.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gluck, Matthew, and Jack Goldsmith. "Donald Trump and the Clemency Process." Federal Sentencing Reporter 33, no. 5 (June 1, 2021): 297–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2021.33.5.297.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the nineteenth century, presidents have largely relied on recommendations from the Office of the Pardon Attorney when granting pardons and commutations. The current process for making clemency recommendations usually takes more than a year. It is governed by Justice Department regulations that outline the factors for consideration of petitions and set forth multiple stages of review. While reliance on pardon attorney recommendations has long been the norm, presidents are not required to use this process. Presidents before Donald Trump had circumvented the pardon attorney. However, no prior president had made the evasion of this process the norm. This article details what appears to be the pardon attorney’s rare involvement in President Trump’s clemency grants.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kalt, Brian C. "Pardon Me?: The Constitutional Case against Presidential Self-Pardons." Yale Law Journal 106, no. 3 (December 1996): 779. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/797310.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Jiménez, Juan Luis, and José Abreu. "Pardon Does not Forgive Democracy: Econometrical Analysis of Pardons in Spain." Revista Hacienda Pública Española 216, no. 1 (March 2016): 81–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.7866/hpe-rpe.16.1.4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Day, Larry. "Pardon Me." Soil Horizons 34, no. 1 (1993): 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sh1993.1.0034.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Fry, Jeremy John. "Pardon Me!" Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 24, no. 1 (December 1, 2015): 24–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.18192/jpp.v24i1.5049.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Drogou, Annick, and Vincent Pachès. "Le pardon." VST - Vie sociale et traitements 96, no. 4 (2007): 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/vst.096.0082.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Osborne, Laurie E. "Antonio's Pardon." Shakespeare Quarterly 45, no. 1 (1994): 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2871299.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Van Vliet, Dennis. "Pardon me?" Hearing Journal 57, no. 12 (December 2004): 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.hj.0000324235.29601.d9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Bunthof, Anja. "Generaal pardon." Maatwerk, 2007 8, no. 3 (June 2007): 128–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03070818.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Kearns, T. "Beyond Pardon." Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 21, no. 3 (August 27, 2014): 688–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isle/isu102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Larson, Atria A. "Bestowing Pardon and Favor: Emperor Henry III’s Pardons in Context." Viator 40, no. 1 (January 2009): 41–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/j.viator.1.100344.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Watanabe, Hayato. "The Municipal Pardon Power." Michigan Law Review, no. 118.4 (2020): 687. http://dx.doi.org/10.36644/mlr.118.4.municipal.

Full text
Abstract:
At the state and federal levels, the pardon power can be used to restore the dignity and legal rights lost by a criminal conviction. Unfortunately, those facing similar consequences from municipal convictions may not have access to a pardon. Although clemency is exceedingly rare at any level of government, municipal defendants face a unique structural problem that deprives them of the possibility of a pardon. Specifically, many cities have simply failed to create a local clemency power. This Note argues that the authority to grant pardons for municipal offenses is part of the toolbox of powers provided to cities through the doctrine of home rule. Accordingly, cities do not have to wait for the permission of their parent states to create a local clemency power. By failing to advocate for a local interpretation of clemency, cities are missing a valuable opportunity to help municipal defendants overcome the stigma and collateral consequences that accompany municipal convictions. While existing scholarship largely ignores the application of clemency to municipal law, this Note offers a legal framework for reimagining the next frontier of clemency.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Abel, Olivier. "Pardon, histoire, oubli." Revue internationale et stratégique 88, no. 4 (2012): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ris.088.0059.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Cooney, Anthony. "Brother Gilbert's Pardon." Chesterton Review 28, no. 1 (2002): 295–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/chesterton2002281/258.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Abel, Olivier. "Mal, responsabilité, pardon." Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses 77, no. 3 (1997): 309–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rhpr.1997.5461.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Bihl, Laurent. "« Sans pardon » (1914)." Sociétés & Représentations 12, no. 2 (2001): 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/sr.012.0045.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Kimpton, George. "Pardon My French." Acute Medicine Journal 18, no. 3 (July 1, 2019): 200. http://dx.doi.org/10.52964/amja.0776.

Full text
Abstract:
Cama et al’s review of pneumothorax management was excellent, especially their elegant depiction of chest tube diameter in comparison to the intercostal space, as measured in French gauge. The use of gauge is medicine is confusing due to differing systems and seemingly random increments. This diagram neatly shows that French gauge (Fr) is directly proportional to diameter, as the external diameter of the tube in millimetres is the gauge multiplied by three. For example, a 15 Fr chest tube has an external diameter of 5mm.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Chokron, Sylvie. "L’intelligence du pardon." Cerveau & Psycho N° 135, no. 8 (January 8, 2021): 88–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/cerpsy.135.0088.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Lozier, Anne-Claire, and Paul-Victor Desarbres. "Pardon à crédit." Communio N° 256, no. 2 (March 1, 2018): 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/commun.256.0007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Miller, Paul Allen. "Pardon the Interruption." Classical Antiquity 41, no. 1 (April 1, 2022): 51–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ca.2022.41.1.51.

Full text
Abstract:
The Timaeus is a muthos that attempts to imagine a logos of the cosmos. Like the demiurge, readers are to be mimetic artists, poets (Tim. 28c3), who move constantly between the intelligible essences and their likenesses in the world of appearance, experience, and becoming, occupying a third register that is neither and both (28a6–b2). The cosmology of the Timaeus is both a likely story and an allegory of its own failure. It takes place within the nonspace of the khōra, a realm accessible only through bastard reasoning that we can perceive only as if in a dream. The Timaeus is an unfinalizable logos in which each moment of positing is also a moment of irony and interrogation, of simultaneous acceptance and active separation, of choric space.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Adeniran, Rita K. "Pardon My Accent!" Holistic Nursing Practice 36, no. 1 (January 2022): 4–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hnp.0000000000000494.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Moussa, Abdallah Cheikh, Abu l-'Ala al-Ma'arri, and Vincent-Mansour Monteil. "l'Epitre du pardon." Studia Islamica, no. 61 (1985): 185. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1595413.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Zarka, Yves Charles. "Penser le pardon." Archives de Philosophie 77, no. 3 (2014): 387. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/aphi.773.0387.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Youngers, Coletta A. "Ecuador’s Pardon Laws." NACLA Report on the Americas 47, no. 2 (January 2014): 50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2014.11721859.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Heinemann, Markus. "Pardon My French." Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 63, no. 05 (August 12, 2015): 353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1559895.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

GREENFIELD, LAZAR J. "Pardon My Patent." Skin & Allergy News 37, no. 10 (October 2006): 10–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0037-6337(06)71582-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Harrison, John. "Pardon as Prerogative." Federal Sentencing Reporter 13, no. 3-4 (February 2001): 147–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2000.13.3-4.147.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Bayes, Daniel A., Amy K. Heath, Carol Williams, and Jennifer B. Ganz. "Pardon the Interruption." TEACHING Exceptional Children 45, no. 3 (January 2013): 64–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500307.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

HALEY, JOHN O. "Apology and Pardon." American Behavioral Scientist 41, no. 6 (March 1998): 842–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764298041006006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Daniel Anderson. "Pardon and Amnesty." Missouri Review 32, no. 4 (2009): 56–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mis.0.0195.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Harris, Lyle Ashton, and William Stern. "Pardon Our Appearance." Art Journal 56, no. 2 (June 1997): 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043249.1997.10791813.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Cole, Thomas B. "Pardon in Brittany." JAMA 306, no. 17 (November 2, 2011): 1836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1586.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

van Bennekom, Iris. "Een generalistisch pardon…" Huisarts en wetenschap 54, no. 8 (August 2011): 455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12445-011-0213-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Causse, Guilhem. "Justice et pardon." Études Mai, no. 5 (April 24, 2019): 69–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/etu.4260.0069.

Full text
Abstract:
Les affaires d’abus sexuels dans l’Église ont remis en avant les thèmes du pardon et de la justice. Peut-on pardonner de tels actes ? Qui peut le faire, et quand ? Un pardon peut-il être donné avant que la justice ne se soit prononcée ? Une lecture de l’Évangile croisée avec celle de quelques philosophes aident à préciser la relation nécessaire et réciproque entre pardon et justice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Saha, Sandeep A., Kousik Krishnan, Clifford J. Kavinsky, Neeraj Jolly, Keyur Parekh, and Dinesh K. Kalra. "Pardon the Interruption." JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 10, no. 17 (September 2017): e155-e157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.062.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Anwar, Reski. "PENGAMPUNAN HAKIM (JUDICIAL PARDON): SEBUAH KONSEPTUAL MENUJU KEADILAN SUBSTANSIAL." ISLAMITSCH FAMILIERECHT JOURNAL 4, no. 1 (November 22, 2023): 20–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.32923/ifj.v4i1.3533.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract: The context of judicial pardon will be the focus of this journal. As a form of substansial justice, the current national Criminal Code recognizes the principle of pardoning judicials, especially for minor offenses involving short-term deprivation of rights. Additionally, this tenet can act as a foundation for balancing justice in society. Through the regulation of judge pardons in the national Criminal Code, efforts to reform material criminal laws are serious issues that require special attention. The way a judge grants a pardon is written suggests that the government wants to go back to how it was before in order to do justice and do it well. In order to account for a judicial's pardon, special conditions or restrictions are used as a reference point. It is impossible to combine the position of a judicial's pardon and its application in a decision, specifically a judicial's pardon decision, into a single free or adjudicated decision; rather, each decision must be considered separately. The draft Criminal Procedure Code and the current Criminal Procedure Code, which will soon be able to accommodate and serve as a direct bridge to prevent this article on the judge's pardon from becoming a wasted article also known as a death sentence are both in this position. Keywords: Judicial Pardon, Rechterlijk Pardon, Substantial Justice Abstrak: Jurnal ini secara khusus akan membahas pengaturan pemaafan hakim (judicial pardon). Pada KUHP nasional saat ini sudah mengenal yang namanya asas pemaafan hakim sebagai bentuk keadilan substansial yang bertujuan untuk sedapat mungkin menghindari hukuman penjara, terutama untuk kejahatan ringan yang melibatkan perampasan hak dalam jangka pendek. Asas ini juga bisa sebagai fondasi sebagai pedoman untuk menyeimbangkan keadilan yang ada didalam masyarakat. Upaya pembenahan undang-undang pidana materiil melalui pengaturan pengampunan hakim dalam KUHP nasional merupakan persoalan serius yang perlu menjadi perhatian khusus. Rumusan mengenai pengampunan hakim mengandung makna bahwa pemerintah berkeinginan untuk kembali kepada keadaan semula demi mewujudkan keadilan dan kembali kepada keadilan yang substansial. Batasan atau syarat khusus dijadikan tolak ukur dalam perumusan pengampunan hakim agar dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Kedudukan pengampunan hakim dan penerapannya dalam suatu putusan, yaitu putusan pengampunan hakim, tidak dapat dirumuskan menjadi satu putusan, baik bebas maupun putusan, melainkan menjadi putusan tersendiri. KUHAP saat ini dan Rancangan KUHAP yang akan datang secepatnya bisamengakomodir dan menjembatani langsung agar pasal pengampunan hakim ini tidak menjadi pasal yang terbuang sia-sia alias pasal mati. Kata Kunci: Pengampunan, Pemaafan Hakim, Keadilan Substansial
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Batut, Jean-Pierre. "Le Pardon – Homélie sur le pardon à partir du débiteur impitoyable." Communio N° 256, no. 2 (March 1, 2018): 65–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/commun.256.0065.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Kwiatkowski, Wojciech. "FEDERALNE PRAWO ŁASKI W STANACH ZJEDNOCZONYCH AMERYKI." Zeszyty Prawnicze 15, no. 3 (December 2, 2016): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2015.15.3.04.

Full text
Abstract:
United States Federal Executive ClemencySummaryThe article relates to the core principles underlying federal executiveclemency as an act that mitigates the punitive consequences resultingfrom a criminal conviction. Presidential clemency is also the least appreciated and most misunderstood of presidential powers – the Constitutionplaces no limits on the way the President exercises his power to pardon,except in cases of impeachment.The article gives a historical overview of the power of clemency in theU.S. Constitution. It also examines the evolution of the Supreme Court’sviews on clemency over the years, both substantively and procedurally,and how the Court has interpreted the power to grant pardons, conditional pardons, as well as amnesties, commutations of sentence, remissions of fines and forfeitures, and respites. It discusses the procedurefor clemency, including the role of the Pardon Attorney, and concludeswith a proposal of certain reforms to reinvigorate the federal pardonprocess and restore its moral force.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Valadier, Paul. "Le pardon en politique." Projet 281, no. 4 (2004): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/pro.281.0067.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Chaouad, Robert. "Le temps du pardon." Revue internationale et stratégique 88, no. 4 (2012): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ris.088.0049.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Hazan, Pierre. "La Realpolitik du pardon." Revue internationale et stratégique 88, no. 4 (2012): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ris.088.0081.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Salas, Denis. "Le voyage du pardon." Histoire de la justice 28, no. 1 (2018): 243. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rhj.028.0243.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Belling, D. V., and G. Kulyamina. "Pardon in german law." Lex Russica, no. 3 (April 5, 2019): 116–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.148.3.116-123.

Full text
Abstract:
In modern Germany, a secular state with a republican form of government, there is still the institution of pardon, known in the pre-Christian era. Under the current Constitution of Germany pardon is carried out by the President of Germany, the decision is not subject to judicial review. The relationship of mercy and justice has been controversial for centuries. Opinions differ in literature and court practice, up to the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. A retrospective of the historical development of the practice of pardon, the analysis of the goals and consequences of this measure convincingly prove the need for the possibility of judicial review of clemency decisions enshrined in the legislation. This is the only effective way to prevent arbitrariness, abuse of power and violation of human rights. The modern legal state should not allow the negative experience of past dictatorships and monarchies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Bothe-Fehl, Ines. "Kein Pardon bei Wissenslücken." Call Center Profi 4, no. 10 (October 2001): 60–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03254617.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography