Academic literature on the topic 'Pauline letters (Corpus Paulinum)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Pauline letters (Corpus Paulinum).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Pauline letters (Corpus Paulinum)"
1
Bosenius, Bärbel. "Kann man die neutestamentlichen Briefe der Gattung „Apostelbrief“ zuordnen?" Novum Testamentum 57, no. 3 (2015): 227–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341490.
Full textAbstract:
During the last 40 years New Testament scholarship did not apply the term “apostolic letter” consistently. All early Christian letters and only the New Testament or Pauline respectively Deutero-Pauline letters were called “apostolic letters” by New Testament scholars. Since the term from the sources ἀπόστολος in the undisputed Pauline letters refers to Paul’s function as founder of early Christian communities but not to his function as their leader, New Testament scholars should avoid the misleading term “apostolic letter.” Within the corpus of New Testament letters one should rather differentiate between “kerygmatic letters,” “pseudepigraphic Pauline letters” and “early Christian Diaspora letters.”
2
Lorek, Piotr. "Jezus jako ΥΙΟΣ w Corpus Paulinum. Ujęcie typologiczne". Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny 60, № 3 (2007): 209. http://dx.doi.org/10.21906/rbl.372.
Full textAbstract:
The New Testament letters attributed to Paul depict Jesus Christ as the Son (υἱός) seventeen times. Using the phenomenon of intertextuality and typology, the present article aims to identify the Old Testament’s inspiration for Pauline use of the title “Son” for Jesus. It appears that some main archetypes of Jesus’ sonship can be recognized (Adam, Isaac, the paschal lamb replacing the firstborn son, Israel corporately as son, David, Solomon, Daniel’s Son of Man, and indirectly Isaiah’s Servant of the Lord). These pictures of sonship are intertwined by Paul and used for all main stages of Jesus’ life and activity (birth, death, resurrection, ascension and ruling, sending the Spirit and the second coming).
3
van Nes, Jermo. "Missing ‘Particles’ in Disputed Pauline Letters? A Question of Method." Journal for the Study of the New Testament 40, no. 3 (2018): 383–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0142064x18755907.
Full textAbstract:
New Testament scholars continue to debate the number of missing ‘particles’ in disputed Pauline letters in order to advocate or challenge their pseudonymity. Surprisingly, however, participants in the debate do not usually define particles nor do they explain how they count missing types. Addressing these methodological issues, the present study suggests using the broader category of ‘indeclinables’ instead of particles, and to count missing types by either comparing the data for a particular letter (or group of letters) against another letter (or group of letters) or in light of the entire Pauline letter corpus. Since the overall result proves to be different for both approaches, it appears that the question regarding the number of missing indeclinables in (pseudo-)Pauline literature is essentially one of method.
4
Duff, Jeremy. "46 and the pastorals: A Misleading Consensus?" New Testament Studies 44, no. 4 (1998): 578–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500016738.
Full textAbstract:
The final portion of 46 (Pauline letters: c. 200 AD) is lost. Standard works assert that the undamaged papyrus did not contain the Pastoral Epistles, and this has been taken as evidence for the existence of a Pauline corpus without the Pastorals. However, in the final third of the extant manuscript, the scribe compresses his writing substantially (by up to 50%). Different explanations of this phenomenon are discussed: the most likely being that the scribe always intended to include the Pastorals, but simply miscalculated the space required. 46 cannot be used as evidence for a Pauline corpus omitting the Pastorals.
5
Gonzaga, Waldecir. "AS CARTAS CATÓLICAS NO CÂNON DO NOVO TESTAMENTO." Perspectiva Teológica 49, no. 2 (2017): 421. http://dx.doi.org/10.20911/21768757v49n2p421/2017.
Full textAbstract:
RESUMO: Nossa intenção, neste artigo, é oferecer um estudo acerca deste conjunto das cartas do Novo Testamento intituladas Cartas Católicas, que desde a antiguidade têm enfrentado não poucos ou indiferentes problemas, seja na aceitação seja no estudo de seu corpus, como o grupo de cartas do Novo Testamento menos estudado ou explorado, mesmo em nossos seminários, faculdades e universidades religiosas em geral, sejam eles católicos ou protestantes; também cremos não ser exagero afirmar que os trabalhos neste campo são mais comuns em meios católicos que em meios protestantes, visto as dificuldades que alguns Pais da Reforma levantaram no que tange à canonicidade de algumas destas cartas e ao fato de que no meio protestante o domínio maior realmente é dos textos paulinos e não dos textos não paulinos do Novo Testamento, como Evangelhos, Cartas Católicas, Hebreus e Apocalipse. Visto a escassez de material nesta área, cremos que um artigo ilustrativo venha nos ajudar a avançar um pouco mais neste campo e produção de material na área, a fim de ajudar a avançar em nossos estudos acadêmicos bíblico-teológicos.ABSTRACT: Our intention in this article is to provide a study into this set of letters of the New Testament titled Catholic Letters, which, since the ancient times, has faced considerable issues in the acceptance and in the study of its corpus, and which constitute the group of letters of the New Testament that are the least studied or explored, even in our seminaries, colleges and religious universities in general, either Catholic or Protestant; we also believe that it would not be an exaggeration to say that the researches in this field are more common in the Catholic circles than in the Protestant ones, given the difficulties that the Fathers of the Reformation raised regarding the canonicity of some of these letters and the fact that, in the Protestant circles, the domain really belongs to the Pauline texts and not to the non-Pauline texts of the New Testament, such as Gospels, Catholic Letters, Hebrews and Revelation. Given the scarcity of documentation in this area, we believe that an illustrative article will help us go further in this field and extend the production of material in this area, in order to help advance our biblical and theological studies.
6
Kloppenborg, John S. "ΦΙΛΑΔΕΛΦΙΑ, ΘΕοΔΙΔΑΚΤοΣ and the Dioscuri: Rhetorical Engagement in 1 Thessalonians 4.9–12". New Testament Studies 39, № 2 (1993): 265–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500022840.
Full textAbstract:
Recent investigation of the Pauline corpus has brought into focus several important facets of Paul's rhetorical skill. It is now generally recognized that Paul knew and used the forms and techniques of classical rhetoric. Various analyses of 1 and 2 Thessalonians, Corinthians 1–4, Galatians, for example, have reinforced the conviction that Paul consciously constructed his letters using rhetorical patterns and appeals. This type of investigation does not, however, operate in opposition to the epistolary analysis that was pioneered by Robert Funk and others. Indeed, attention to epistolary clichés and formulae proves especially valuable in reconstructing the ‘rhetorical situation’ of each letter, since these provide a road map of the conversation between Paul and his partners, indicating, for example, what is prior shared knowledge, what is new information and what are the points of controversy in the matters discussed.
7
North, J. Lionel. "‘Good Wordes and Faire Speeches’ (Rom 16.18 AV): More Materials and a Pauline Pun." New Testament Studies 42, no. 4 (1996): 600–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500021445.
Full textAbstract:
In Rom 16.18 we have a unique word, alongside another word which is used by Paul in a unique way. That is challenge enough to any student of the language of the Greek NT. ‘Faire speeches’ is the AV's rendering of εὐλογία. Elsewhere in the NT, where it occurs 16 times, εὐλογία is always used in an approving sense, of the human praise of God or of the divine bounty for which praise is due. The word is found nine times in the Pauline corpus; a little earlier in this same letter, Paul had spoken about his certainty that he will visit Rome ‘in the fullness of the blessing (εὐλογία) of Christ’ (15.29 RSV). After that and the other Pauline and the non-Pauline usage, the use at 16.18 grates on the ear.1Its context shows that here εὐλογία is being used disparagingly, of men who flatter to deceive (ἐξαπατῶσιν) and work to mislead and divide the community. Today, we might call such men ‘smoothies’ who ‘turn on the charm’, ‘chat up’ the gullible, ‘talk up’ their policies and ‘sweet talk’ their way to success for their own selfish purposes.
8
Wold, Benjamin. "“Flesh” and “Spirit” in Qumran Sapiential Literature as the Background to the Use in Pauline Epistles." Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106, no. 2 (2015): 262–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znw-2015-0016.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: Zu den Traditionen, die den paulinischen Gebrauch von „Geist“ und „Fleisch“ beeinflusst und geformt haben könnten, gehört die palästinische Weisheitsliteratur, vor allem 4QInstruction (4Q415–418; 4Q423; 1Q26). Dieser Aufsatz nimmt den negativen Gebrauch des Wortes „Fleisch“ in den Blick, der sich sowohl in 4QInstruction als auch bei Paulus findet, stellt aber die These in Frage, dass dieser in 4QInstruction in eine dualistische Kosmologie eingebettet ist. „Fleisch“ wird in 4QInstruction mit Verderbtheit und Sünde in Verbindung gebracht, was kosmische Dimensionen, inkl. quasi-dämonischer Mächte, einschließt, steht aber niemals in einem binären Verhältnis zum Begriff „Geist“. Die weitere Analyse, wie „Fleisch“ und „Geist“ in 4QInstruction aufgefasst werden, hat zudem Implikationen für das Verständnis der Anthropologie dieser Schrift sowie für das Verständnis des Verhältnisses ihrer Trägergruppe zu göttlicher Offenbarung. Zudem werden neue Vergleichspunkte zwischen der Schrift und ausgewählten Passagen aus dem Corpus Paulinum eröffnet.
9
Hutson, Christopher R. "Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles: A Study of Linguistic Variation in the Corpus Paulinum. By Jermo van Nes." Journal of Theological Studies 70, no. 2 (2019): 817–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jts/flz071.
Full text
10
Artuso, Vicente, and Adriano Lazarini Souza dos Santos. "“O EVANGELHO DE PAULO”: EM QUE CONSISTE? ANÁLISE A PARTIR DO PENSAMENTO DE JAMES D.G. DUNN." PARALELLUS Revista de Estudos de Religião - UNICAP 10, no. 25 (2020): 409. http://dx.doi.org/10.25247/paralellus.2019.v10n25.p409-430.
Full textAbstract:
O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar o teologúmeno concentrado na expressão “Evangelho de Paulo” e suas notas características dentro da Teologia Paulina. James D.G. Dunn, famoso exegeta escocês, traz o tema para o centro do debate e o coloca como a dimensão capital da vocação e missão do apóstolo Paulo. Neste ensaio procuraremos, ao modo de uma montagem de painéis, explicitar alguns dos principais aspectos da mensagem paulina sintetizadas na palavra “Evangelho de Paulo” e suas expressões correlatas. Para tal finalidade, utilizaremos o método expositivo-descritivo, apresentando: 1) Origem e significado do termo εὐαγγέλιον no Primeiro e Segundo Testamentos; 2) Análise temática do termo εὐαγγέλιον no Corpus Paulinum sob a ótica de James Dunn; 3) Relação do εὐαγγέλιον paulino com os Sinóticos a partir das contribuições do exegeta Johan Konings. “THE GOSPEL OF PAULO”: ANALYSIS FROM THE THOUGHT OF JAMES D.G. DUNNAbstractThe article aims to explain some aspects of the "Gospel of Paul" axiom as presented in the works of James Dunn. His research highlights aspects of Paul’s Gospel inherited from Scripture and the Gospel of Christ. The break with Judaism occurs with the resurrection of Christ. In fact, the death and resurrection of Christ inaugurates a new covenant, new life, spiritual life. The study shows James Dunn's contribution in highlighting the tension between new and old, between the historical-salvific and apocalyptic perspective in Pauline theology. Contributions are not opposed. The apocalyptic genre is common in the Jewish and Christian tradition. Thus in Paul's new perspective, the opposition between Judaism and Christianity, faith and works is not accentuated. The Gospel of Paul is good news that eliminates antagonisms and includes differences.Keywords: Perspective. Paul. Gospel. Jesus. Judaism.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Pauline letters (Corpus Paulinum)"
1
Burgi, Martin. "Die Kreuzestheologie des Corpus Paulinum: Perspektiven aus dem Neuen Testament und aus der Wirkungsgeschichte." Diss., 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/26511.
Full textAbstract:
Text in German with summaries in German and English<br>Die Kreuzestheologie erlebt seit Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts eine anhaltende
Renaissance. Die vorgelegten Beiträge gehen zwar von gemeinsamen Wurzeln aus,
verzweigen sich jedoch in vielfältige, teilweise disparate Entwürfe. Deshalb ist neu zu
fragen, was Kreuzestheologie ist. Die Antwort wird in sieben Schriften des Corpus
Paulinum gesucht, welche auf ihren kreuzestheologischen Gehalt befragt werden.
Dabei zeigt sich trotz unterschiedlich häufiger Verwendung der kreuzestheologischen
Begriffe durchwegs die entscheidende Bedeutung des Kreuzes Jesu in den
theologischen Grundlinien. Kreuzesaussagen erscheinen immer im Zusammenhang mit
den zentralen Thesen der paulinischen Briefe. Der exegetische Befund führt zum
Schluss, dass bei der paulinischen Kreuzestheologie von einem theologischen Ansatz
zu sprechen ist, der zurecht umfassenden und kritischen Anspruch auf christliche
Theologie und kirchliche Praxis erhebt.<br>The “theology of the cross” has seen a remarkable come-back since the beginning of
20th century. While the various contributions share similar roots, they differ widely in
their approaches and constructions. Therefore, the simple question regarding the nature
of a theology of the cross has to be raised again. This study seeks answers in seven
writings of the Corpus Paulinum, which will be examined for their use of references to
Jesus’ death on the cross. Although these letters differ significantly in their use of crossrelated terminology, they consistently testify to the crucial significance of the cross of
Jesus in their theological paradigm. Statements about the cross are always an essential
ingredient in the argumentation of these letters. The exegetical survey leads to the
conclusion that Pauline theology of the cross is an all-encompassing and critical
approach and principle for Christian theology and ecclesial practice.<br>New Testament<br>M. Th. (New Testament)
2
Hundt, Christian. "Heiligkeit bei Paulus : Hagios und Stammverwandte im Corpus Paulinum." Diss., 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5030.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis examines the use of hagios and related words in the Pauline Literature. Its aim
is to outline the understanding of holiness in Paul. A methodological outline is following
on introduction (Holiness in OT and Second Temple Judaism) and summary of research.
A first survey of the relevant biblical references indicates a division into three chapters to
be appropriate: Holy Spirit, Sanctification and the Holy Ones.
Paul’s thinking on Holiness and Sanctification is theocentrically grounded with strong
christological inclinations. Sanctification concerns all areas of life, demands dedication
and ethical consequences and leads to eschatological perspectives. Sanctification is a com-
munal enterprise, forms identity and urges for solidarity. Sanctification doesn’t follow on
justification. Both are parallel expressions for the Christ-event reaching out on human
lives.
Holiness-terminology has a manifold communicative potential: the transfer towards
God’s sphere is described, paraenesis is motivated for, identity founded and strengthened,
christian solidarity advertised for.<br>Diese Arbeit untersucht den Gebrauch von Heiligkeitsterminologie (insbesondere Hagios und Stammverwandte) im Corpus Paulinum, um sich so dem Heiligkeitsverstandnis des
Paulus zu nahern. Nach Einleitung (u.a. Heiligkeit in AT und Fruhjudentum) und Forschungsuberblick
wird die Konzeption der Untersuchung dargestellt. Ein erster Uberblick
uber die relevanten Stellen legt nahe, das Material in je ein Kapitel zu „Heiligem Geist",
„Heiligung" und „den Heiligen" zu gliedern.
Paulus versteht Heiligkeit und Heiligung theozentrisch-soteriologisch fundiert und christologisch
akzentuiert. Heiligung betrifft das ganze Leben, erfordert Hingabe und ethische
Konsequenzen und geht einher mit eschatologischer Orientierung. Heiligung geschieht in
Gemeinschaft. Heiligkeit formt Identitat („die Heiligen") und fordert Solidaritat. Rechtfertigung
und Heiligung stehen nicht im Verhaltnis eines „Nacheinander", sondern sind
parallele Ausdrucksformen fur das Menschen ergreifende Christusgesehehen.
Das kommunikative Potential von Heiligkeitsterminologie ist vielfaltig: der „Transfer auf
die Seite Gottes" wird beschrieben, Paranese motiviert, Identitat gestiftet und gestarkt
und um christliche Solidaritat geworben.<br>New Testament<br>M. Th. (New Testament)
3
Drews, Alexander. "Paulus in gemeinschaft seiner Mitarbeiter: eine Untersuchung der Kollegialmission im Corpus Paulinum und in der Apostelgeschichte (Paul in the fellowship of his co-workers: a survey of Paul among his co-workers in the Corpus Paulinum and in Acts)." Diss., 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1848.
Full textAbstract:
This dissertation attempts to illuminate the significance of what has been called the "coworkers"
for Paul's mission. At the same time it revises the traditional portrait of Paul as a
"lone ranger", not properly understood and appreciated by others. Thus the focus is on the
way in which Paul together with his co-workers as his missionary partners achieved the
various tasks of early Chrisian mission, namely the proclamation of the gospel and the
consolidation of churches. This phenomenon is best described with the German term
Kollegialmission, i.e. a mission carried by a team of colleagues.
A survey of research is followed by a detailed analysis of this phenomenon in the letters
commonly recognised as written by Paul himself. In additon to explicit statements on the
co-workers, attention is also given to implicit references, e.g. verb forms in the first person
plural which appear in some letters and contribute to understanding this Kollegialmission.
Then the same methodological procedure is applied to the disputed letters of Paul. A final
chapter examines the portrait of Paul and his co-workers in the Book of Acts.
This dissertation demonstrates that this understanding and practice of Kollegialmission
was a central point in Paul's mission and self-understanding. His co-workers receive their
commission and authority from God, to whom they are responsible. The gospel constitutes
the foundation for this cooperation between Paul and his co-workers. Thus the co-workers
perform the same duties as Paul himself, though his special apostolate remains in place.
The picture of the Kollegialmission in the Deuteropauline letters differs only slightly from
that of the letters generally recognised as Paul's own. As the author of Acts is mainly
interested in the person of Paul, his co-workers appear increasingly on the backstage as the
story unfolds. This examination closes with an application of some principles of Paul's
Kollegialmission to present day congregational ministry and mission work.<br>Theology<br>M.Th.
4
Orth, Christopher Jonas. "DER TOD CHRISTI: DARSTELLUNG UND DEUTUNG IM CORPUS PAULINUM UND IN DER GEGENWÄRTIGEN DISKUSSION UM DIE SÜHNETHEOLOGISCHE DEUTUNG DES TODES JESU." Diss., 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23363.
Full textAbstract:
Text in German, abstracts in English and German<br>Die Diskussion zum richtigen Verständnis des Todes Christi hat zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhundertsnoch an Vehemenz zugenommen. Dabei wird vor allem die traditionelle Deutung desTodes Christi als stellvertretender Sühnetod stark kritisiert und ihre Berechtigung in Fragegestellt. Die vorliegende Arbeit nimmt die wesentlichen Fragen dieser Kritik aus dem deutschsprachigenRaum auf. Anhand einer historisch-kanonischen Exegese der Stellen, bei denen derTod Christi in den als echt anerkannten paulinischen Briefen explizit oder implizit angeführtwird, wird die jeweilige Deutung dieses Todes geprüft. Ferner werden die Fragen nach demtraditionsgeschichtlichen Hintergrund der verschiedenen Deutungen behandelt. Lässt sich dieVorstellung des stellvertretenden Sühnetods bei Paulus als zentrale und angemessene Deutungdes Todes Christi nachweisen oder kann sie aufgegeben werden?<br>The discussion of the proper interpretation of the death of Christ has been gaining momentum
since the beginning of the 21st century. In particular, the traditional interpretation of Christ’s
death as expiation and penal substitution faces severe criticism and its warranty is challenged
from several perspectives. This thesis takes up the essential critique voiced in the discussion in
central Europe. By means of a historical-canonical exegesis of the explicit or implicit references
to Christ’s death in the authentic Pauline letters, it examines how Christ’s death is understood
in each case. The questions of the possible backdrop of these references to the death
of Christ will also be examined. The thesis argues that, in Paul’s understanding of Christ’s
death, penal substitution and atonement are appropriate and central categories which must not
be abandoned in reconstructions of Pauline soteriology<br>New Testament<br>.M. Th. (New Testament)
Books on the topic "Pauline letters (Corpus Paulinum)"
1
A lost edition of the Letters of Paul: A reassessment of the text of the Pauline corpus attested by Marcion. Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1989.
Find full text
2
Hughes, James T. Ecclesial Solidarity in the Pauline Corpus: Relationships Between Churches in Paul's Letters. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2019.
Find full text
3
Florcovski, André. Os Hinos nas Cartas Paulinas: Liturgia e escritura na comunidade cristã primitiva. Brazil Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31012/978-65-5861-203-2.
Full textAbstract:
This research aims to study the presents hymns in the corpus paulinum (Phil 2,6-11; Col 1,15-20; Eph 1,3-14) from its sitz im leben cultic, and considering the relationship between Scripture and liturgy in the early christian community. The research will start from the observation of the presence of hymns in the religions of the peoples of the ancient Near East, through Israel and the Hellas, until the early Church. Although the forms are taken up, the New Testament hymns differ themselves from their predecessors as its core content: the Christ event. So, it is considered will each of the hymns in its christological reference in the context of pauline theology. Finally, will be analyzed the presence of these hymns in the roman Liturgy current, identifying each of the celebrative contexts in which these hymns are present, whether as a prayer of praise addressed to God, either as exhortation to the community. Hymns thus express that double movement that defines every liturgical action: the glorification of God and the sanctification of man
Book chapters on the topic "Pauline letters (Corpus Paulinum)"
1
"1 Thessalonians, the Pauline corpus and Acts." In The Theology of the Shorter Pauline Letters. Cambridge University Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139166263.005.
Full text
2
"Colossians, the Pauline Corpus and the theology of the New Testament." In The Theology of the Later Pauline Letters. Cambridge University Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520488.005.
Full text
3
"The theology of Ephesians within the Pauline Corpus and the New Testament." In The Theology of the Later Pauline Letters. Cambridge University Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520488.010.
Full text
4
Eastman, David L. "Conclusion." In The Many Deaths of Peter and Paul. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767183.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
In the Acts of the Apostles, Peter and Paul play the lead roles. The impulsive fisherman from Galilee and the erstwhile persecutor of the followers of Jesus become the primary mouthpieces for this new movement among both Jews and Gentiles. Yet for all of Luke’s descriptions of the apostles’ travels and their deeds, he leaves large gaps in the overall narratives of their lives—gaps also not addressed in the letters ascribed to these apostles. For later Christians these biographical gaps needed to be filled. This gave rise to a robust corpus of literary and artistic traditions that drew inspiration from, and expanded freely upon, both the Acts of the Apostles and the Pauline and Petrine epistolary traditions....
5
"The Love Commandment in the Authentic Pauline Letters and Ephesians 5:2: An Intertextual Study in the Development of Agape Ethics in the Pauline Corpus." In “To Recover What Has Been Lost”: Essays on Eschatology, Intertextuality, and Reception History in Honor of Dale C. Allison Jr. BRILL, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004444010_013.
Full text