Academic literature on the topic 'Paulus, Friedrich'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Paulus, Friedrich.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Paulus, Friedrich"
1
Lincicum, David. "A Previously Unknown Letter from H. E. G. Paulus to Karl Joseph Hieronymus Windischmann (13 February 1804)." Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 25, no. 1-2 (May 25, 2018): 152–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znth-2018-0008.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This edition presents a letter from Heinrich Eberhard Gottlob Paulus to Karl Joseph Hieronymus Windischmann, dated 13 February 1804, in which Paulus thanks Windischmann for his translation of Plato, discuses philosophy, and mentions the pending appointment of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher.
2
Zaklukiewicz, Tomasz. "Friedrich W. Horn (HG), "Paulus Handbuch", Tübingeg 2013, ss. 653." Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana 1 (2016): 223–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.18276/cto.2016.1-13.
Full text
3
Portisch, Wolfgang. "Friedrich L. Cranshaw/Nicole Michel/Christoph G. Paulus (Hrsg.), Bankenkommentar zum Insolvenzrecht." Deutsche Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Insolvenzrecht 22, no. 1 (January 2012): 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dwir.2012.044.
Full text
4
Ledermann, François. "Müller-Jahncke, Wolf-Dieter; Friedrich, Christoph; Paulus, Julian (Mitarb.): Geschichte der Arzneimitteltherapie. Stuttgart, Deutscher Apotheker Verlag, 1996. 295 S. III, Portr. DM/SFr. 78.-. ISBN 3-7692-2038-2." Gesnerus 54, no. 3-4 (November 27, 1997): 311–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22977953-0540304050.
Full text
5
Jelitto-Piechulik, Gabriela. "Die „grande Dame“ der deutschen Literatur. Ricarda Huchs Werk nach 150 Jahren Cord-Friedrich Berghahn, Jörg Paulus, Jan Röhnert Hrsg.: Geschichtsgefühl und Gestaltungskraft. Funktionalisierungsverfahren, Gattungspoetik und Autorreflexion bei Ricarda Huch. Universitätsverlag Winter, Heidelberg 2016, 333 S." Germanica Wratislaviensia 143 (December 17, 2018): 506–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/0435-5865.143.34.
Full text
6
Kita-Huber, Jadwiga. "Der (un)menschliche Wissenschaftler. Jean Pauls "Dr. Katzenbergers Badereise" (1809) und die Frage nach dem Menschen." Studia Germanica Gedanensia, no. 40 (December 22, 2019): 207–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.26881/sgg.2019.40.17.
Full textAbstract:
In seiner späten Erzählung Dr. Katzenbergers Badereise konstruiert Jean Paul die Figur eines zynisch-nüchternen und von seinem Sujet besessenen Wissenschaftlers, der – ergriffen von besonderer Liebe für Abweichungen, Anomalien und Querulantentum – stets Grenzen überschreitet. Das Werk entstand in Auseinandersetzung mit zeitgenössischen naturwissenschaftlichen Streitfragen und anthropologischen Entwürfen und wurde sowohl von Schriftstellern (Goethe, E. T. A. Hoffmann, Tieck, Platen, J. Grimm) als auch Naturwissenschaftlern stark rezipiert. Der Anatomie-Professor Johann Friedrich Meckel widmete Jean Paul – als Reaktion auf dieses Werk – die Abhandlung De duplicitate monstrosa und bedankte sich in seinem Widmungsbrief explizit für Dr. Katzenberger. Im Beitrag soll geprüft werden, inwieweit Jean Pauls Text die Frage nach dem (Un-) Menschlichen im Menschen problematisiert und so das anthropologische Wissen seiner Epoche erweitert.
7
Silva, Fagner Veloso Silva. "A hermenêutica de Paul Ricœur no ensino de filosofia no ensino médio." Trilhas Filosóficas 12, no. 1 (October 24, 2019): 149–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.25244/tf.v12i1.29.
Full textAbstract:
Resumo: O ensino da disciplina de Filosofia constitui no exercício/atividade filosófica na sala de aula, pois através desta atividade buscar-se-á criar, inventar, reinventar e produzir novos saberes e ações que se configurem como uma experiência filosófica. A experiência do filosofar proporciona uma maior flexibilidade entre o pensar e o agir, tendo como finalidade a constituição do si do alunado. Como praticamente a aula de Filosofia no Ensino Médio consiste numa aula expositiva, a relação entre professor e o aluno, entre aquele que “explica” e aquele que “compreende” sugere a busca de algo em comum: interpretar o texto. Por certo, o primeiro e mais elementar trabalho de interpretação é captar aquilo que o autor se propôs ao escrever determinado texto. Por esta razão buscamos investigar quais são as contribuições de uma hermenêutica no Ensino Médio, tendo como finalidade a busca de uma “ferramenta” (hermenêutica) que o professor possa oferecer para seu alunado, proporcionando-lhes um meio de compreender a eles mesmos e o mundo em que estão inseridos, o papel da hermenêutica e sua contribuição para a vida dos alunos é a de auxiliá-los na compreensão da realidade que eles vivenciam, para que possam desenvolver uma melhor vivência em sociedade.
Palavras-chave: Apropriação. Filosofar. Hermenêutica. Mundo do Texto.
Abstract: The teaching of the discipline of Philosophy constitutes in the exercise/philosophical activity in the classroom, because through this activity will seek to create, invent, reinvent and produce new knowledge and actions that are configured as a philosophical experience. The experience of philosophizing provides a greater flexibility between thinking and acting, having as purpose the constitution of the student's self. As practically the Philosophy class in High School is an expositive class, the relationship between teacher and student, between the one who "explains" and the one who "understands" suggests the search for something in common: to interpret the text. Of course, the first and most elementary work of interpretation is to capture what the author proposed in writing a particular text. For this reason we seek to investigate the contributions of a hermeneutics in High School, aiming at the search for a "tool" (hermeneutics) that the teacher can offer to his / her student, providing them with a way to understand themselves and the the role of hermeneutics and their contribution to students' lives is to help them understand the reality they experience, so that they can develop a better experience in society.
Keywords: Appropriation. To philosophize. Hermeneutics. World of Text.
REFERÊNCIAS
GENTIL, Hélio Salles. Historicidade e compreensão das narrativas de ficção a partir da hermenêutica de Paul Ricoeur. In. PAULA, Adna Candido de; SPERBER, Frankl(Organizadoras). Teoria literária e hermenêutica Ricoeuriana: um diálogo possível. Dourados, MS: UFGD, 2011, p. 177-193.
GRODIN, Jean. Qué es la hermenéutica? Tradução de Antoni Martinez Riu. Barcelona: Editora Herder, 2008.
KAMESAR, Adam. Biblical Interpretation in Philo. In. KAMESAR, Adam. (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Philo. Cambridge: Editora University Press, 2009, p. 65-91.
ORÍGENES. Tratado sobre os princípios. São Paulo: Paulus, 2012.
RICŒUR, Paul. O si-mesmo como outro. São Paulo: Editora WMF Marins Fontes, 2014.
RICŒUR, Paul. O conflito das interpretações: ensaios de hermenêutica. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1978.
RICŒUR, Paul. El discurso de la acción. 2ª ed. Madrid: Cátedra, 1988.
RICŒUR, Paul. Teoria da interpretação: o discurso e o excesso de significação. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2000.
RICŒUR, Paul. Del texto a la acción: ensayos de hermenêutica II. Editora: Fondo de Cultura Económica. México, 2002.
RICŒUR, Paul. Hermeneutica e acción: de la hermenêutica del texto la hermenêutica de la acción. Buenos Aires: Editora Prometeo, 2008.
RICŒUR, Paul. Historia y narratividad. Barcelona: Editora Paidós, 1999.
RICOEUR, Paul. The Text as Dynamic Identity. In: VALDÉS, Mario J.; MILLER, Owen J. (eds.). Identity of the Literary Text. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985. 175-186.
RICŒUR, Paul. A hermenêutica bíblica. São Paulo: Editora Loyola, 2006.
RICŒUR, Paul. Retórica, poética y hermenêutica. Madrid: Universidade autònoma de Madrid, 1997.
SCHLEIERMACHER, Friedrich D.E. Hermenêutica: arte e técnica da interpretação. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 1999.
UNESCO. Aprender a viver juntos: nós falhamos? Brasília: UNESCO, IBE, 2003. Disponivel em: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001313/131359por.pdf Acesso: 22/04/2018
THIOLLENT, Michel. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo: Editora Cortez, 1986.
8
Nieuwstraten, J. "Het werkelijke onderwerp van Aert de Gelders 'Heilige Familie' te Berlijn." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 112, no. 2-3 (1998): 157–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501798x00338.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractWhen Aert de Gelder's painting (fig. i) was purchased for the Kaiser Friedrich Museum, Bode wrote a note on it in the Amtliche Berichte aus den königlichen Kunstsammlungen 31 (1910) which, despite the brevity of the text, established the interpretation of the representation until now. Bode adopted the title by which the work is generally known, 'The Holy Family', without any reservations, but regarded the unconventional conception of the religious subject as genre-like and profane. He saw this incongruity as the consequence of De Gelder's extreme 'naturalism', which in his opinion was manifest in the types and costumes of Jews from the Orient, portrayed so faithfully that to Bode they resembled nothing so much as 'a family of Jewish immigrants from Poland' ... (refugees from the pogroms were evidently a common sight at that time). The characterisation of the figures is amazingly vivid, but struck Bode as almost comical. To him, oddly, De Gelder's drastic realism was coupled with a rendering based on Rembrandt's last, broad manner of painting but executed coquettishly ; too much an end in itself, it was this virtuoso method that divested the work of the serious mood appropriate to the subject. Bode's negative assessment of 1910 was surpassed by Plietzsch in 1960, but their repudiation of De Gelder's art has since been superseded by positive appraisals in publications of the past few decades. Unfortunately, though, their total misconception of the picture persists. It is still thought to be the profane conception of the religious subject, the conclusion being that the painter only chose his biblical scenes as an excuse to paint colourful pictures of orientals in stereotypical garments. Only in his old age is De Gelder credited with having painted biblical subjects - notably the Passion series - with inner conviction. This complex of speculations is built on the quicksand of carelessly observed figures: the putative Mary is an old woman with jewels in her ears, on her forehead and round her wrists; the alleged Joseph is very close to her, his hand on her shoulder - such intimacy is unthinkable for the Holy Family. The figure on the far right is taken for an unrecognizable subsidiary figure. What Bode confidently imputes to De Gelder as a profane interpretation is blatantly unhistorical fiction: every history painter always felt obliged to depict his subject recognizably and in keeping with the facts and circumstances, arbitrary personal departures from which would have branded him as ignorant and stupid. It is disconcerting and tragi-comical that a mistaken identification of the subject of one painting, resulting from downright carelessness in the observation of details, could go unnoticed and uncriticized for so long and, what is more, be the point of departure for purely speculative statements about De Gelder's alleged indifference to the biblical subjects he depicted. It goes without saying that this articulate figure composition of an aged couple with an infant, laughing for joy, presents familiar characters, and the account in the Old Testament (Genesis 17-21) corresponds with the elements of De Gelder's scene. The frequent mention of laughter - in seven passages- inspired the painter to depict Abraham and Sarah with their child Isaac, whose name means 'to laugh'. It is a scriptural representation, albeit not of a situation from an actual story. There was no precedent for this specific image - the fruit of personal familiarity and sympathy with the story in the Book of Genesis- which explains why it was unknown and hence hard to recognize. De Gelder's wholly personal interpretation of the story is also apparent in his invcntion : the contrast between the family's joy and the forlorn Ishmael at the far right. In fact, though, the supposedly profane work provides proof positive of the paintcr's personal religious persuasion, and it is not the only one of its kind in his oeuvre. Another picture of Sarah and Abraham (fig. 2), iconographically just as unique, dates from the same pcriod - according to Sumowski from the early 1680s. It shows the episode in which Sarah insists on the banishment of Ishmael and his mother as related in Genesis 21:10, but De Gelder depicts Sarah as a supplicant, pleading with Abraham, distressed by Ishmael's harsh behaviour towards little Isaac (not in Genesis, but in Paul's Epistle to the Galatians). Jan Victors' picture (fig. 3) 'The Feast in Celebration of Isaac's Weaning; Ishmael's Mockery of Isaac' (Genesis 21:8-9) shares three significant elements with De Gelder's Berlin painting. First the frequent laughter: Ishmael's is mocking, Isaac's triumphant and Hagar's barely concealed. Second, Isaac's important attribute, the fruit he is holding up. Third: here, too, Ishmael is dark-skinned ; as the son of an Egyptian this might be expected, but in the seventeenth century and in our part of the world only these two artists, to my knowledge, depicted him thus. The occurrence of these three unusual elements in both painters' works is evidence that De Gelder was familiar with Victors' picture. In Victors' (fig.4) and C.W.E. Dietrich's (fig.5) paintings 'The Banishment of Hagar and Ishmael' the apple(-like) fruit is seen again; these two artists and De Gelder evidently gave Isaac this attribute in order to distinguish him from Ishmael. In view of Rembrandt's etching B.33 (fig.6), we may assume that his aforementioned pupils learned this device from him. The argument that the father and son in Rembrandt's etching are Jacob and Benjamin, taken from a drawing of Jacob and his sons, offers no explanation for the somewhat provokingly triumphant expression with which the lad holds up the fruit; in connection with the paintings discussed here, the identification of this father and son as Abraham and Isaac would appear to be convincingly confirmed.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Paulus, Friedrich"
1
Fraschka, Mark A. "Friedrich Paulus nach Stalingrad." kostenfrei, 2008. http://www.opus-bayern.de/uni-wuerzburg/volltexte/2009/3504/.
Full text
2
Paulus, Kay [Verfasser], Friedrich [Gutachter] Knop, and Guido [Gutachter] Pezzini. "Some momentum polytopes for multiplicity free quasi-Hamiltonian manifolds / Kay Paulus ; Gutachter: Friedrich Knop, Guido Pezzini." Erlangen : Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 2018. http://d-nb.info/1154308731/34.
Full text
3
Havemann, Daniel. "Der Apostel der Rache : Nietzsches Paulusdeutung." Berlin : W. de Gruyter, 2002. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb39140727k.
Full text
4
Carter, Adam Thomas Colenso. "Irony and ideology in Schlegel, De Man, and Rorty /." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape11/PQDD_0007/NQ42729.pdf.
Full text
5
Medeiros, Humberto Duarte de. "A visão de homem em Nietzche e Paulo." Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos, 2008. http://www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/2035.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-04T21:02:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 29Programa Institucional de Capacitação de Docentes e Técnicos
Neste trabalho busco analisar a visão básica de homem presente no pensamento do filósofo Nietzsche e do apóstolo Paulo. Nesse olhar dobrado procuro contemplar a relação existente na visão de homem nietzschiana e na visão paulina. Essa busca se dá a partir dos escritos dos autores e de seus comentadores, procurando identificar a fundamentação da visão de homem de cada um dos pensadores em foco. A primeira parte do texto procura identificar o conceito de corrupção do homem. Para Nietzsche, a corrupção presente no homem é resultado da realidade do cristianismo. Ele atribui à fé cristã a responsabilidade pela corrupção da humanidade. Esse processo se deu pela invenção da idéia de um Deus punidor e recompensador. Relacionada a idéia de Deus, o pecado e suas conseqüências também foi uma invenção cristã para manipular a humanidade. Assim, ele mostra que o homem precisa romper com essas idéias, por que elas negam, destroem a vida. Enquanto Nietzsche nega a realidade do pecado, Paulo edifica seu conceito de corrupção
In this paper, I seek to analyze the basic vision of this man in the thought of the philosopher Nietzsche and the apostle Paul. In this double looking, I try to contemplate the relationship existing in the vision of man nietzschiana and in the vision pauline. This search is given from the writings of the authors and their commentators, trying to identify the reasons for man's vision of each thinkers in focus. The first part of the text has as its purpose to identify the concept of corruption of man. For Nietzsche corruption present in the man is a product of the reality of Christianity. He attaches the Christian faith as responsible for the corruption of humanity. This process made by the invention of the idea of a God punishment and rewarding. Linked with the idea of God, sin and its consequences also was a Christian invention to manipulate mankind. Thus, it shows that man must break with these ideas, because they deny and destroy his life. As Nietzsche denies the reality of sin, Paulo builds its concept of
6
Lubimova-Bekman, Lada. "Rezeption von Aphorismen eine textlinguistische Studie /." Berlin : Schmidt, 2001. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/47209895.html.
Full textAbstract:
Slightly revised version of her dissertation (Ph. D.), Universität-Bremen, 1999--Cf. p. (7).Anhang presents the aphorisms chiefly discussed, those by Jean Paul, Novalis, and Friedrich Schlegel. Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-115).
7
Machado, Bruno Martins 1978. "A psicologia em "Humano demasiado humano" : Nietzsche, Paul Rée e a história natural da moral." [s.n.], 2013. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/281227.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Oswaldo Giacoia JúniorTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-25T10:35:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Machado_BrunoMartins_D.pdf: 2434097 bytes, checksum: b96f84372054d404807b2f07636b5d11 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013
Resumo: A presente tese de doutoramento tem como propósito analisar e justificar a emergência e a importância da noção de psicologia dentro do projeto filosófico nietzscheano a partir do primeiro aforismo de Humano, Demasiado Humano. Ao observarmos o conjunto do programa, percebe-se que o filosofo anunciou no primeiro aforismo do livro de 1878 tanto um projeto, quanto um plano interpretativo. Portanto, ao analisar MA I 01, tem-se contato (i) com a natureza da empresa crítica nietzscheana, (ii) com os termos de sua proposta metodológica e (iii) com o alcance positivo de sua perspectiva teórica. Esses três fatores apontariam para dois conceitos fundamentais em sua filosofia: história e psicologia. Defendemos que tanto a história quanto a psicologia denotam a influência de Paul Rée como um dos interlocutores mais presentes na obra de Nietzsche desse período. A determinação da psicologia, oriunda das exigências metodológicas trazidas pela filosofia histórica, remete à pergunta pela emergência das significações e das construções provenientes dos chamados sentimentos morais. Nesse curso, Nietzsche produziu sua filosofia sobre um solo psicológico em que as sensações e os sentimentos funcionariam como os elementos empíricos constitutivos das coisas humanas
Abstract: This doctoral thesis aims at analysing and justifying the coming to light and the importance of the notion of psychology within Nietzsche's philosophical project, departing from the first aphorism of Human All Too Human. When one observes this program as a whole, one realizes that Nietzsche has announced in the first aphorism of the 1878 book at the same time a project and a plan of interpretation. Analysing, therefore, MA I 01, one approaches (i) the nature of Nietzsche's critical undertaking, (ii) the terms of his methodological proposition and (iii) the positive scope of his theorietical perspective. All of these three elements would indicate fundamental philosophical concepts: history and psychology. Such determinations denote the especial influence of Paul Rée as one of the most present philosophical interlocutors of Nietzsche's life. The determination of psychology which comes to light in virtue of methodological demandings (historical philosophy) leads back to the question concerning the coming to light of the meanings and productions grounded in moral sentiments. Thus, on this way Nietzsche elaborated his philosophie on the ground of the psychology, where the sensations and the sentiments could be taken as the empirical elements which constitute human things
Doutorado
Filosofia
Doutor em Filosofia
8
Worth, Ryan Mitchell. "Romantic Symbolism Re-examined: The Ontic Fallacy." BYU ScholarsArchive, 2021. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/9136.
Full textAbstract:
Romantic symbolism is a poorly understood concept. It was first formulated by the Romantics in a variety of contexts. Goethe develops his theory of the symbol most notably in his scientific works. Schelling's approach to the Romantic symbol is firmly rooted in his philosophical writings. Coleridge articulates a Romantic notion of symbolism across his extensive literary criticism. The foundational influence of these related theories of Romantic symbolism can be seen in the artistic, literary, and scientific productions of Romantic minded individuals all over Europe in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. However, the nature and scope of the Romantic symbol as originally formulated by Goethe, Schelling, and others has been obfuscated in unfortunate ways by the contemporary theoretical assumptions and narrow interpretations of recent academic scholarship. This thesis restores the original connotation of the Romantic symbol by identifying the common way in which it is misconstrued: the ontic fallacy.
9
Båth, Katarina. "Ironins skiftningar — jagets förvandlingar : Om romantisk ironi och subjektets paradox i texter av P. D. A. Atterbom." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Litteraturvetenskapliga institutionen, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319276.
Full textAbstract:
This dissertation explores the intimate relationship between irony and romantic subjectivity, by drawing on feminist psychoanalytical theory, via an examination of the shiftings of irony, and humor, in the works of the Swedish romanticist P. D. A. Atterbom (1790–1855). It looks at the critical role played by irony in the formation of Romantic subjectivity, and explores irony’s potential to undermine dualistically gendered notions of subject-object relations. For Atterbom, irony is an aesthetic concept closely related to drama, informed not only by German Romantic-ironic theorists such as Friedrich Schlegel and Jean Paul, but also by the works of Shakespeare, Ludwig Tieck, and E. T. A. Hoffmann. The thesis follows the shiftings of Romantic irony in Atterbom’s major literary texts: the cycle of poems Blommorna [The Flowers] (1811), where the Ovidian transformations are used metafictively to play with the relation between poet, poem, and reader; and the literary satire Rimmarbandet [The Rhyme Band] (1810), which, inspired by Tieck’s Der Gestiefelte Kater (1797), uses the metafictive theatre-in-the-theatre motif, as well as carnivalesque and grotesque motifs to expose contrived theatricality and homosocial misogyny in the prevailing culture. The dynamic between the satirist’s subject and the attacked object is a polarized power struggle, where revolt is followed by submission. In this respect, Romantic satire is here conservative. In the fairy tale play Lycksalighetens ö [Island of Felicity] (1824–27), tragedy’s irony is a dialectic between the ideal and the real that strives to create both inner and outer renewal. The play reaches out metafictively to the reader and turns her/him into the poet of a new version of the fairy tale. The reading/writing process inscribed in the work thus becomes a form of renewal and liberation from grief, and old, patriarchal gender roles. Finally, the humorous, unfinished idyll Fågel Blå [Blue Bird] (1814, 1818, 1858) is a work in many pieces, a fragment, a sketch and a non finito that together stages a restorative creative process, where the reader is asked to take part in joining together the scattered parts of Blue Bird itself. To conclude, irony is a feature of Romanticism, which makes the Romantic, literary subject relational and dialogical, open to its Other, and herein lies a form of ethics and an escape from a conventional, patriarchal notion of the self. I discuss this with Julia Kristeva’s theories on how subjectivity changes when it becomes poetic and Jessica Benjamin’s Winnicott-influenced theory of how play can offer a way out from patriarchy’s strict gender roles. The shiftings of irony in Atterbom’s work show a development from the satirical subject, where an aggressive form of self-assertion conceals a lack of individuality – via tragedy’s painstaking efforts to integrate repressed aspects of the self – to the idyll’s more harmonious subject, who has the capacity to laugh at him/herself and see both the grotesque in the holy, and the holy in the grotesque.
10
Brott, Jonathan. "The Point of Play : Resuscitating Romantic Irony in Metamodern Poetics." Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157375.
Full textAbstract:
This essay investigates the prospect of Romantic Irony’s potential resurgence in contemporary poetics and discusses its relevance and likeness with metamodernism. The internet has by now not only seeped into, but fully permeated, the process of literary production and distribution. The effect of this has been the birth of a new kind of poetic discourse which can broadly be called metamodernism, The New Sincerity or Alt-lit. This movement is characterized by its self-reflexive metacommentary, fragmentary nature and an oscillation between of irony and sincerity. Vermeulen and Akker, among others, have hinted at metamodernism’s relation to Romanticism, but research into the specifics of its tendency towards Romantic Irony is scarce. By viewing the writings of Steve Roggenbuck (a central figure in the new poetic movement), alongside the philosophy of Friedrich Schlegel, I propose a comparative framework for discussion of sincerity, irony and the instrumentalization of contemporary metamodernist writing. I demonstrate that Roggenbuck’s writing displays narratological, tropological and thematic tendencies commonly associated with both Romantic Irony and metamodernism. Apart from broader structural comparison, I attempt a comparative analysis between Roggenbuck’s poetry (2010-2015) and Thomas Carlyle’s novel “Sartor Resartus” (1833-1834) in order to provide a visualisation of the rhetorical and narratological strategies of Romantic Irony. I aim to frame Romantic Irony as a sensibility, or mode of discourse - rather than a strict system of thought - which may still be at work today. In extension, the sensibilities of Romantic Irony may shed further light into the philosophical potential of the seemingly incomprehensible and contradictory tendencies of metamodernism. By ironicizing its poetic form, literary ambition and desire for sincerity in a post-postmodern era, Roggenbuck’s poetry celebrates ambiguity and literary failure, ultimately framing irony as a constructive and potentially democratic operation.
Books on the topic "Paulus, Friedrich"
1
Steinkamp, Peter. Generalfeldmarschall Friedrich Paulus: Ein unpolitischer Soldat? Erfurt: Sutton, 2001.
Find full text
2
Reschin, Leonid. Feldmarschall im Kreuzverhör: Friedrich Paulus in sowjetischer Gefangenschaft, 1943-1953. Berlin: edition q, 1996.
Find full text
3
Reschin, Leonid. Feldmarschall im Kreuzverhör: Friedrich Paulus in sowjetischer Gefangenschaft, 1943-1953. Berlin: edition q, 1996.
Find full text
4
Er ist mein Gegner von jeher: Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling und Heinrich Eberhard Gottlob Paulus. Warmbronn: Keicher, 2001.
Find full text
5
Jean Pauls Weg zur Metapher: Sein "Buch" Leben des Quintus Fixlein. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 2003.
Find full text
6
Die Metapher und ihre Krise: Zur Dynamik der "Bilderschrift" Jean Pauls. New York: P. Lang, 1987.
Find full text
7
Hegel's undiscovered thesis-antithesis-synthesis dialectics: What only Marx and Tillich understood. Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books, 2012.
Find full text
8
Realizing freedom: Hegel, Sartre, and the alienation of human being. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Find full text
9
Situation und Botschaft: Die soteriologische Vermittlung von Anthropologie und Christologie in den offenen Denkformen von Paul Tillich und Walter Kasper. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
Find full text
10
Burkard, Thorsten, ed. Plautus – des Lateinischen Richtmaß und Großmeister. Wachholtz Verlag, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783529095009.
Full textAbstract:
Noch als Student verfasste der deutsche Dichter Paul Fleming (1609-1640) ein literaturtheoretisches Gedicht namens Satyra, in dem er sich über den zu engen Klassizismus der Leipziger Universität beklagte und seine stilistische Plautus-Nachfolge rechtfertigte. Dieses wichtige, stellenweise schwer verständliche Gedicht wird hier zusammen mit einer Übersetzung und einem begleitenden Kommentar präsentiert. In mehreren Spezialkapiteln wird die Satyra in den Kontext der damaligen Zeit, vor allem in die Tradition der Plautusapologie eingeordnet. In einem Anhang wird das bisher von der Forschung nicht erkannte Vorbild, eine Satire des Plautusverehrers Friedrich Taubmann (1565-1613), kritisch ediert, übersetzt und erläutert.
Book chapters on the topic "Paulus, Friedrich"
1
Rader, Olaf B. "Petrus und Paulus schützen 1240 den Papst." In Friedrich II., 462–66. Verlag C.H.BECK oHG, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/9783406739255-462.
Full text
2
"Friedrich Breckling’s Paulus Redivivus (1688) and Catalogus Haereticorum (c.1697–1703)." In Early Modern Prophecies in Transnational, National and Regional Contexts (3 vols.), 133–88. BRILL, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004443631_005.
Full text
3
Michael, Theodor. "Black German." In Black German, translated by Eve Rosenhaft. Liverpool University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781781383117.003.0002.
Full textAbstract:
When I was born in Berlin, the year 1925 was just fifteen days old. Fourteen days earlier the Apostolic Nuntius Eugenio Pacelli, later Pope Pius XII, had delivered the congratulations of the diplomatic corps to Reich President Friedrich Ebert. Nobody expected that barely two months later Friedrich Ebert would be dead. After his death the aged Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg, a living legend since his victory over the Russian army at Tannenberg, became President. Of course I knew nothing about all this; people told me later that I had enough trouble of my own getting into the world and staying alive. My mother was already seriously ill when I was born, and she died a year later....
4
Løland, Ole Jakob. "Paul against Empire." In Pauline Ugliness, 140–76. Fordham University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823286553.003.0006.
Full textAbstract:
The image of a political thinker that arises from Taubes’s readings of Paul is the result of Taubes’s peculiar method of reading Paul through key thinkers of the twentieth-century European thought, such as Nietzsche, Benjamin, and Barth. The political aspects of the philosophers’ readings are brought to the fore by Taubes’s intertwinement of historical and philosophical perspectives, but also of the crossing of the Jewish and the Christian. Taubes’s political Paul is drawn from contradictory meanings within the Pauline epistles, primarily Romans. On one hand Taubes’s Paul is anti-imperial as the apostle’s message amplifies a seething antagonism toward the values of the Greco-Roman world and “declares war” against the Emperor himself. On the other, Taubes’s Paul develops a “nihilism” which is actually “quietist” and withdrawn in relation to direct contestation of actually existing authority. This nihilistic view of the apostle can be further argued for through affinities between readings of biblical scholars of our day and Friedrich Nietzsche, building further upon Taubes’s interpretations of Paul.
5
Løland, Ole Jakob. "Conclusion." In Pauline Ugliness, 177–84. Fordham University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823286553.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
Paul is a figure through whom Jacob Taubes can discern his true disagreement with his intellectual opponents, such as Friedrich Nietzsche. The Pauline epistles provide some perspectives for Taubes to reconsider the Christian culture that shaped his identity as a German-speaking Jew in a post-Holocaust Europe. These texts are useful for this particular reader to reconsider history without ever fully separating it from philosophy. The contemporary philosophical turn to Paul, considered by taking Taubes as its prime example, can partly be explained by these philosophers’ (Taubes, Badiou, Agamben, Žižek) attraction to Paul as an antinomian figure, a figure of lawlessness and freedom from law that can lead to apocalyptic violence (for Taubes) or pave the way for an existential and political break with the domain of law, as in the philosophies of Alain Badiou and Slavoj Žižek. While these two continental philosophers draw upon other readings of the apostle than Taubes’s, Giorgio Agamben bases his readings of Paul on several aspects in Taubes’s works. Nonetheless, the call from Taubes to reinterpret Paul through Freud and Nietzsche is more consistently followed in the recent work of Ward Blanton.
6
Cooper, Chris. "3. Fighting disease." In Blood: A Very Short Introduction, 40–58. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199581450.003.0003.
Full textAbstract:
‘Fighting disease’ looks at how the immune system and vaccination work. It considers the scientific studies of Louis Pasteur, late in the 19th century, who brilliantly expanded on the work of Robert Koch and Friedrich Henle, to formally expound the germ theory of human disease. But how did the body defend itself against these micro invaders? The phagocytic theory of immune defence resulted from the work of Élie Metchnikoff, Paul Ehrlich, and Emil von Behring. Immunoglobulin molecules provide the key to how the body creates the variety of molecules needed to protect against the different invaders experienced over a lifetime, and to how vaccination against a disease protects against future infection.
7
Hunnekuhl, Philipp. "Friedrich Schlegel, Coleridge, and the Ethics of Amathonte." In Henry Crabb Robinson, 194–212. Liverpool University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621785.003.0008.
Full textAbstract:
Chapter seven discusses Robinson’s final attempt at making a living as a professional comparatist, or intercultural ‘literator’, to use his own term – his translation and critical transmission of Christian Leberecht Heyne’s ‘Persian tale’ Amathonte (published by Longman under the title Amatonda in 1811). Amathonte, in all its humour and playfulness characteristic of Heyne, is a scathing satirical attack on the habitual indifference with which one imbibes, from familial and social authorities, motives for decision-making. Robinson, in the preface to his translation, hence praises the book as ‘a picture of moral excellence and domestic felicity’, not least for its abolitionist appeal and advocation of emancipated communal life. This chapter hence argues that Robinson undertook the transmission of the work, encompassing his critical introduction of Friedrich Schlegel to his readers as well as appended samples from Jean Paul, according to his pioneering approach of ‘Free Moral Discourse’. Amathonte subsequently caught the attention of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who discussed and praised it in a letter to Robinson of March 1811. Chapter seven therefore also recapitulates Robinson’s ‘intimate acquaintance’ with, and ‘enthusiasm for’ (Diana Behler), the critical school of the Schlegel brothers, in particular their Athenaeum.
8
Read, Colin. "Astronomical Roots of Risk Management Measures." In Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, 99–115. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4754-9.ch006.
Full textAbstract:
The mean-variance approach has remained the de facto method to characterize risk ever since Markowitz' development of Modern Portfolio Theory. This mean-variance underpinning goes back much further, though, to an era before modern street lighting when humankind held a fascination with the cosmos and the movement of the planets. At the same time, physicists and mathematicians were employed to allow gamblers to improve their odds in games of chance. The techniques are now applied to the more down-to-earth challenges of the characterization of risk and optimization of reward. I describe the work of the pioneers who collective gave us the mean-variance tool. This retrospective analysis of the history of risk and financial markets arose from the collective innovations of Daniel Bernoulli, Carl Friedrich Gauss, Louis Bachelier, Jacob Marschak, Harry Markowitz, William Sharpe, Paul Samuelson, and Fischer Black and Myron Scholes. Their contributions helped establish our understanding of the science of risk management.
9
Glusker, Jenny Pickworth, and Kenneth N. Trueblood. "Crystals." In Crystal Structure Analysis. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199576340.003.0010.
Full textAbstract:
The elegance and beauty of crystals have always been a source of delight.What is a crystal? A crystal is defined as a solid that contains a very high degree of long-range three-dimensional internal order of the component atoms, molecules, or ions. This implies a repetitious internal organization, at least ideally. By contrast, the internal organization of atoms and ions within a noncrystalline material is totally random, and the material is described as “amorphous.” Studies of crystal morphology, that is, of the external features of crystals, have been made since early times, particularly by those interested in minerals (for practical as well as esthetic reasons) (Groth, 1906–1919; Burke, 1966; Schneer, 1977). It was Max von Laue who realized in 1912 that this internal regularity of crystals gave them a grating-like quality so that they should be able to diffract electromagnetic radiation of an appropriate wavelength. From Avogadro’s number (6.02 × 1023, the number of molecules in the molecular weight in grams of a compound) and the volume that this one “gram molecule” of material fills, von Laue was able to reason that distances between atoms or ions in a crystal were of the order of 10−9 to 10−10m (now described as 10 to 1 Å). A big debate at that time. was whether X rays were particles or waves. If X rays were found to be wavelike (rather than particle-like), von Laue estimated they would have wavelengths of this same order of magnitude, 10−9 to 10−10 m. Therefore, since diffraction was viewed as a property of waves rather than particles, von Laue urged Walther Friedrich and Paul Knipping to test if X rays could be diffracted by crystals. Their resulting diffraction experiment was dramatically successful. The crystal, because of its internal regularity, had indeed acted as a diffraction grating. This experiment was therefore considered to have demonstrated that X rays have wavelike properties (Friedrich et al., 1912). We now know that particles, such as neutrons or electrons, can also be diffracted.
10
Steffek, Jens. "Prophets of international technocracy." In International Organization as Technocratic Utopia, 37–60. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845573.003.0003.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter is focused on the emergence of technocratic internationalism. The first section shows how praise for rational public administration developed in philosophy. It discusses Henri de Saint-Simon’s ideas about the virtues of expert government; the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill; and how German philosopher Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel idealized Prussia’s efficient bureaucracy. From these philosophical foundations, the chapter proceeds to the professionalization of public administration that in the 19th century took place in all industrialized countries and some of their colonies. The trend spilled over to the international level in the form of the ‘international public unions’, expert bodies with administrative tasks which ignited the imagination of technocratically inclined visionaries. Having sketched the historical context, the second part of the chapter presents the first programmatic proposals for bureaucratic international governance. They were tabled in the 1880s, when international lawyers moved from an analysis of these public unions to a programmatic vision of international relations managed by these bodies. The discussion zooms in on the Russian law scholar Pierre Kazansky and the American political scientist Paul S. Reinsch, whose respective works offer clear examples of how colonialism influenced early thinking about international organizations.