Academic literature on the topic 'PayPal'

PayPal is an international payment gateway allowing businesses and individuals to transfer funds in a secure manner over the Internet. Using PayPal to accept payments has several advantages for online merchants. It is a recognized brand when it comes to Business to Consumer (B2C) transactions, creating a business account with PayPal is easier and faster, and finally, PayPal lends its name to the transaction, so customers may feel more comfortable entering into a transaction with a previously unknown merchant. Besides the mentioned advantages, PayPal’s transaction dispute system requires a tracking number from a shipped package to respond to a customer dispute. If the product is purely electronic (a download or access to a site, for example), one’s response to disputes will be quite limited. The solution for the problem mentioned above is PayPal API. The PayPal API resolves Pay Pal drawback through maintaining card and bank account payment schedules without the liability of warehousing payment data also processing one-time and recurring payments. For the evaluation of Pay Pal API, the authors develop an Event Registration Management System (ERMS). ERMS serves as a platform for users to make registrations for events such as conferences, seminars, and workshops.

The riot by white supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017, generated a public debate about the role of platforms in policing users involved in violent hate speech. PayPal’s efforts on this issue, in removing services from some designated hate groups while continuing to serve others, highlights the challenges payment platforms face when they act, whether formally or informally, as regulators. This article examines PayPal’s policies and enforcement efforts, both proactive and reactive, in removing its services from hate groups in the United States. It pays particular attention to the surveillance and screening practices that PayPal employs to proactively detect users who violate its policies. The article argues that public calls for PayPal to identify and remove its services from hate groups raise critical questions about ceding broad regulatory authority to platforms and reveal the serious challenges of relying upon commercial enterprises to address complex social problems.

In PayPal/iZettle the CMA has, for the first time in a Phase II investigation, directly considered the issue of ‘killer acquisitions’. It assessed whether PayPal's acquisition of iZettle might have been motivated by an intention to prevent future competition from an emerging rival. This article first explores the wider concerns surrounding killer acquisitions, putting the PayPal/iZettle decision in context. It explains the difficulties that some countries face in ensuring that high value acquisitions of innovative start-ups with low revenues are still subject to regulatory control, and the steps that countries like Germany and Austria have taken to resolve this. It then analyses the CMA's decision, highlighting the importance that the CMA placed on the parties’ internal documents for determining the rationale for the transaction and the justification for the amount paid. The article concludes by noting that potential killer acquisitions are likely to remain on the radar of competition regulators (in Europe and the UK) for some time to come.

In transactions using Paypal, of course, there are many reasons for the risk of disputes occurring, ranging from delays in delivery, damaged goods, and transactions without authorization. The problem will be different when they carry out business transactions in different regions of the country and they have different nationalities. The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach, a normative juridical approach is carried out by studying legal norms or rules, while the empirical approach is carried out by direct interviews with sources who will relate to research problems, the data analysis used is qualitative. In trading transactions via the internet, trade is generally carried out by people who are located and subject to different countries and jurisdictionsThe legal relationship between Payment Gateway Users and Payment Gateway Providers At Fintech Paypal Indonesia is where the parties involved in the electronic payment system include consumers, business actors, acquirers, issuers and payment gateway providers. legal relationships that arise between consumers, business actors, acquirers, issuers and payment gateway operators are born from agreements made by the parties. Dispute Resolution and Chargeback Claims in Payment Gateway Transaction activities on Paypal Fintech where the paypal system provides services can communicate directly with the seller by opening a dispute at the Paypal Dispute Settlement Center. if it is not completed in following the policies provided by paypal services, consumers or business actors can ask for recommendations to mediate to the paypal service center but if they are not finished, business actors and consumers can resolve disputes through litigation, which usually business actors are subject to the applicable law, applies where the consumer is a national.