Relevant bibliographies by topics / Phenomenology of giveness

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Phenomenology of giveness'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 9 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Phenomenology of giveness.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Phenomenology of giveness"

1

Alves, Pedro M. S. "Tempo objectivo e experiência do tempo--A Fenomenologia husserliana do Tempo perante a Relatividade Restrita de A. Einstein." Phainomenon 14, no. 1 (April 1, 2007): 115–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/phainomenon-2007-0018.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In this paper, I start with the opposition between the husserlian project of a phenomenology of the experience of time, started in 1905, and the mathematical and physical theory of time, as it comes out from the special theory of relativity, by Einstein, in the same year. Although the contrast between the two approaches is apparent, my aim is to show that the original program of Husserl’s time theory is the constitution of an objective time and a time of the world, starting from the intuitive giveness of time, i.e., from time as it appears. To show this, I stress the structural similarity between the original question of time, by Husserl, and the problem of a phenomenology of the space constitution, as it was first developed in the husserlian manuscripts of the XIX century, in which we find the threefold question of the origin of our space representation, of the geometrization of intuitive space and the constitution of transcendent world space. Finally, I reconsider some of Husserl’s main theses about the phenomenological constitution of objective time in the light of the main results of special relativity time-theory, introducing several corrections to central assumptions that underlie Husserl’s theory of time.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Somphong Unyo, Phramaha. "An Analytical Study of Ideally Inherent Operative Transformation of the Original Mental Process in Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology." Psychology and Education Journal 58, no. 1 (January 15, 2021): 4410–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1521.

Full text
Abstract:
This research paper entitled “An Analytical Study of Ideally inherent Operative Transformations of the Original Mental Process in Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology” has three objectives: 1) to study the mental process of reflection and modification in which that mind is directed towards the intended object including the mental objects regarding Western philosophical thought, Edmund Husserl, 2) to study of the way to operative transformation of original mental process and, 3) to analyze various forms of transformed reproduction and a problem of the reproduction. It is found that the transformation of the original mental process in Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology is the ideally inherent process of reproduction of mental process in which the mental process passed through the modificative process together with its contents so as to produce a novel knowledge. The transformative process as such is systematically operated with main following aspects: (1) The mode of giveness (the immanent essence of a concrete sensation-content such as a visual sensation-content in the field of visual sensation-Data that is continually adumbrated from the visual physical objects), (2) the temporal mental processes are to be unified as one stream of mental process, (3) the phase or the temporal horizon which is cosmic time in other ways such as horizon of Now, horizon of Before, and horizon of After, and (4) pure ego, the function of which is to direct its regards to the temporal modes of giveness (immanent essences). By its transformative operation, it is effectively proceeded with three steps. The first is a step of a physical perception of the mental process in which the perceived physical things is used as an essential content for all mental process as they are kept in a memory. The second step is succeeded from the first step which is called a retention or a primary memory; the process of a modification using the immanent object kept in a retention as the initial part of the constitution of an identical object. Then, comes the third step which is the step of a recollection or a second memory; it is to recall the remembered or represented for the perception again. After the whole process has fully accomplished, the remembered or represented is afresh reproduced. However, the reproduction of the remembered or the represented can emerge with two possibilities; one is the vague-reproduced information as without repeating while looking at the reproduced flash; other is afresh one as it is repeated resulting in further perception. However, the reproduction of the remembered can be accurate and perfect depending on two conditions; one is the condition of the perception of physical things and the condition of either clarity or obscurity of the whole object that is re-presented with the mode of mental process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Trabbic, Joseph G. "Jean-Luc Marion and the Phénoménologie de la Donation as First Philosophy." American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 95, no. 3 (2021): 389–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021610232.

Full text
Abstract:
Jean-Luc Marion proposes what he calls the “phenomenology of givenness” (phénoménologie de la donation) as the true “first philosophy.” In this paper I consider his critique of previous first philosophies and his argument for the phenomenology of givenness as their replacement. I note several problems with the phenomenology of givenness and conclude that it does not seem ready yet to assume the title of “first philosophy.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

BELOUSOV, MIKHAIL. "GIVENNESS AS PROBLEM OF PHENOMENOLOGY." HORIZON / Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija/ STUDIEN ZUR PHÄNOMENOLOGIE / STUDIES IN PHENOMENOLOGY / ÉTUDES PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIQUES 8, no. 2 (2019): 536–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-536-572.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Terzi, Roberto. "The event and the (non-)phenomenon: Marion/Derrida." Phainomenon 26, no. 1 (October 1, 2017): 155–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/phainomenon-2017-0009.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The issue of the event and its relation to the concept of phenomenon has been widely spread in the French phenomenology of the last decades. Firstly, this article aims at retracing some general aspects of the role of the event in what has been called the “New phenomenology in France” and raises the problem of a distinction between different uses of this concept. Secondly, it analyses in two phases the presence of this topic in Marion’s phenomenology. On the one hand, it has to be shown that the concept of the event occupies an increasingly important role in Marion’s thinking, for it characterises givenness and phenomenality as such. On the other hand, I intend to problematize the position of Marion, in so far as it leads to an integral givenness and unfolds on the basis of an ambiguous overlap of the themes of givenness and intuition. Finally, Marion’s analysis will be contrasted to Derrida’s thinking, which allows us to think at the event as an impossible that happens, as a constitutive non-givenness and therefore as an essential limitation for phenomenology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zhang, Wie. "An introduction to Scheler’s Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity." Phänomenologische Forschungen 2017, no. 1 (2017): 117–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000107751.

Full text
Abstract:
The phenomenological reflection of „deception“ and „self-deception“ occupies a central place in Max Scheler’s whole phenomenological period. In contrast with „self-givenness“, „deception“ essentially means an inappropriate way of givenness, and „self-deception“ indicates an inappropriate way of givenness of the „self“. Based on the further criticisms and reflections on F. Brentano’s and E. Husserl’s related thoughts, Scheler distinguished „self-perception“ from „inner perception“, and attributed the primordial position to the „inner perception of the other“ via criticizing the „deception of self-perception“. He then obtained an account of a truly primary way of grasping the other, namely, the primary „self-givenness“ of „the other’s person“. This contributes to the possibility of Scheler’s „phenomenology of intersubjectivity“. In this paper, I will argue that Scheler’s phenomenological criticism of „self-deception“ and his phenomenological analysis of „inner perception of the other“ function as an „introduction“ to his „phenomenology of intersubjectivity“.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Heffernan, George. "From the Essence of Evidence to the Evidence of Essence." History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 16, no. 1 (April 5, 2013): 192–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/26664275-01601009.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper poses a problem with respect to Husserl’s concept of evidence in The Idea of Phenomenology. In the beginning, Husserl approaches phenomenology as theory of knowledge, focuses on the essence of knowledge, and defines it in terms of evidence. In the middle, he shifts his attention to the definition of evidence as “self-givenness” but gets carried away by the search for a preferred kind of evidence, namely, the evidence of essences. In the end, he remains preoccupied with eidetic knowledge and describes “evidence in the pregnant sense” as absolute, adequate, and apodictic “self-givenness”. The paper shows that these developments have serious consequences for an interpretation of The Idea of Phenomenology as a reliable introduction to Husserl’s phenomenological epistemology and important implications for the phenomenology of evidence beyond this work.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rivera, Joseph. "The Myth of the Given?" Philosophy Today 62, no. 1 (2018): 181–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201837207.

Full text
Abstract:
The theological turn in phenomenology continues to generate cross-disciplinary discussion among philosophers and theologians concerning the scope and boundaries of what counts as a “phenomenon.” This essay suggests that the very idea of the given, a term so important for Husserl, Heidegger, Henry and Marion, can be reassessed from the point of view of Wilifred Sellars’s discussion of the myth of the “immediate” given. Sometimes phenomenology is understood to involve the skill of unveiling immediate data that appear as “phenomena” to a conscious and wakeful ego. In conversation with Jean-Luc Marion’s volume Givenness and Revelation, I challenge the assumption that phenomena are immediate in their givenness. The final remarks concern the “how” of the givenness of theological data, and in particular, the phenomenon of the Trinity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Urbaniak, Szczepan. "Phenomenology as Apologetics." Forum Philosophicum 27, no. 2 (December 27, 2022): 193–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2022.2702.12.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, we analyse the relation of philosophy and theology in the work of Jean‑Luc Marion in order to be able to see not only how the phenomenology of givenness can serve as a “new apologetics” for theology, but also how Marion’s phenomenology itself, in its historical development and in its core principle and method, is influenced and changed by theological phenomena. We present three ways of describing the relation, tension, mutual influence and separation of philosophy and theology: firstly, in line with Pascal’s distinction between the orders of reason and of the heart; secondly, in phenomenology, in terms of indications to the effect that there can be a phenomenon of revelation in the mode of possibility that is distinguished from the phenomenon of Revelation in theology in the mode of historicity; and thirdly, by analogy with Christian apologetics. In particular, we analyse this third dimension, putting forward the thesis that Marion’s phenomenology itself has some characteristics of the Christian apologetics he describes. We try to demonstrate this interpretation of his phenomenology in its key dimensions, such as the counter-method and descriptions of the phenomena of love and revelation, which constitute the culmination of the phenomenology of givenness, although at the same time, as it were, its limit, crossing over into the theological order.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Szegedi, Nóra. "The Renewal of Phenomenology in France: Levinas and Marion." Phänomenologische Forschungen 2019, no. 1 (2019): 173–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000108311.

Full text
Abstract:
Starting from Hans-Dieter Gondek’s and L/szl7 Tengelyi’s statement concerning the recent development of French phenomenology, I examine the relation between Marion’s phenomenology of givenness and Levinas’ ethics. Focusing on their common concept of the call (appeal), I demonstrate, first, that Marion’s general concept of the phenomenon is based on Levinas’ idea of the manifestation of the Other, which he deprives of its original ethical meaning. In the second part I criticize Marion’s anti-ethical reading of Levinas, while trying to give a tenable interpretation of the meaning of the ethical. Taking into consideration the results of the second section, in the third part, I look into the possibility of a different general phenomenology starting from Levinas’ ethics. By this rather sketchy idea I intend to provide a possible alternative to Marion’s general phenomenology of givenness, which maintains the privilege of the Other and, consequently, the primacy of ethics
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Phenomenology of giveness"

1

Piro, Vincenzo. "Entre phénoménologie et apophatisme : à partir de Jean Luc Marion." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3080.

Full text
Abstract:
« Poète et non honnête homme. On ne consulte que l’oreille, parce qu’on manque de cœur » : il y a peut-être une très grande proximité entre cette pensée de Pascal et l’inspiration de la pensée de Marion. Dans l’article « De la “mort de Dieu” aux noms divins » il fait allusion à une logique de la charité à développer, comme tâche pour la pensée. Ce qu’on a tenté de reconstruire, c’est le développement de cette inspiration, en ayant comme point de départ le concept de négation, tel qu’il émerge dans Certitudes négatives. La négation constitue, dans ce texte, par le concept de certitude négative, un troisième élargissement de la phénoménalité, qui saisit non seulement l’excès de l’intuition par rapport aux concepts, mais l’impossibilité que l’excès impose aux concepts. Marion présente un discours sur la limite, transcendantale, à entendre comme le lieu où se donne un degré redoublé de réalité. Cette avancée, qui montre qu’aussi la négation relève de la donation, doit être mise en perspective avec le constat, qui caractérise la fin de Reduction et donation, que la négation, par l’ennui, est la condition pour accéder à la donation. On a essayé d’approfondir ce nœud par la reconstruction de l’émergence de la négation dans la pensée de Marion et de ses caractères, avec une particulière attention au concept de distance et à sa genèse. Par cette voie on a pu mettre en évidence l’articulation concrète et la centralité dans l’œuvre de Marion du rapport entre phénoménologie et apophatisme, et la façon avec laquelle elle peut se développer en une logique de la charité
Between phenomenology and apophatism : starting from Jean-Luc Marion « Poet and not honest man. We consult only the ear, because we lack heart ». There is perhaps a great proximity between this thought of Pascal and the inspiration of Marion's thought. In the article « De la “mort de dieu” aux noms divins » he alludes to a logic of charity to develop, as a task for thought. What we have tried to reconstruct is the development of this inspiration, having as a starting point the concept of negation, as it emerges in certain Certitudes négatives. Negation constitutes in this text, by the concept of negative certainty, a third enlargement of phenomenality - after the givenness and saturated phenomena - which captures not only the excess of intuition in relation to concepts, but the impossibility that excess imposes on concepts. Marion presents a discourse on the transcendental limit, to be understood as the place where a redoubled degree of reality is given. This advance, which shows that the negation belongs to the givenness, must be put into perspective with the finding, which characterizes the end of Reduction and givenness, that negation, through boredom, is the condition for accessing the donation. We tried to analyze this crux by reconstructing the emergence of negation in Marion's thought and its characters, with particular attention to the concept of distance and its genesis. In this way it has been possible to highlight the concrete articulation and centrality in Marion's work of the relationship between phenomenology and apophatism, and the way in which it can develop into a logic of charity
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Haas, Alexander. "Marion, Heidegger, and the question of givenness." Kent State University / OhioLINK, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1595008180179881.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Disco, Bernard William. "God's Gracious and Scandalous Gift of Desire: The Liturgy of the Eucharist in Louis-Marie Chauvet's 'Symbolic Exchange' with Jean-Luc Marion's Phenomenology of Givenness and René Girard's Mimetic Theory." Thesis, Boston College, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108628.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis advisor: John Baldovin
Traditionally, Church teaching has examined the Eucharist in metaphysical terms (‘what is it?’: substance, presence, and causality) and its liturgical celebration as a sacrifice (a re-presentation of Christ’s self-sacrifice on the cross). Prompted by Vatican II’s exhortation to the faithful for ‘full, conscious, active participation’ in the liturgy (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium 14, 27, 30), this dissertation re-interprets the Eucharistic liturgy and participants’ role in it through the root metaphor of gift: a gift of desire, which impacts participants’ desires, relationships, and selfhood. It proposes a ‘relational approach’ to the Eucharist by asking: What is going on ‘relationally’ in the Eucharistic celebration? How might the Eucharist impact our desire, relations, identity? How does or ought the liturgy of the Eucharist concern relationships between the participants and others? What specifically does the Church celebrate in its liturgy of the Eucharist? Louis-Marie Chauvet’s ‘symbolic exchange’ model of the Eucharistic Prayer, when put in conversation with both Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology of gift and René Girard’s mimetic theory, yields an understanding of the Eucharist as God’s gracious and scandalous gift of divine desire. The gift is gracious as an embodied expression of divine love, and also scandalous as it challenges recipients’ autonomy with a radical call to charity demanding an existential response. This dissertation upholds Christ’s self-gift as the ultimate decision to love in a perfect reversal of sacrificial violence, which Christians are called to imitate. It emphasizes the liturgy’s structure as a dynamic event of being encountered by God’s gift of himself and reception of this gift through particular responses. This understanding aims to re-appropriate traditional Catholic teaching on the Eucharist in more contemporary terms. It aims to explain how ‘fully conscious and active participation’ in the sacred mysteries occurs, that liturgy and life may be more richly interrelated
Thesis (STD) — Boston College, 2019
Submitted to: Boston College. School of Theology and Ministry
Discipline: Sacred Theology
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Uy, John Carlo. "Towards A Mystical Subject: A Sketch On The Basis of Marion's Philosophy." Master's thesis, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-331673.

Full text
Abstract:
This study aims to articulate on the basis of Jean-Luc Marion's philosophy a mystical interpretation of subjectivity. The first chapter follows Marion's reading of the history of metaphysics, in order to set-up the transcendental conditions of the mutual exclusion of God and the self. The second chapter takes up Marion's alternative to expand the field of philosophical rationality which metaphysics had limited. Marion proposes a phenomenology of givenness to overcome the limits of metaphysical thought. The final chapter attempts to establish a link between mysticism, understood in the specific sense of the primacy of the Good over Being, and the gifted, or the new figure of subjectivity. keywords : Jean-Luc Marion, history of metaphysics, phenomenology of givenness, saturated phenomenon, mystical theology
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Phenomenology of giveness"

1

Givenness & hermeneutics. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Reduction and givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and phenomenology. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lewis, Stephen D., and Jean-Luc Marion. Givenness and Revelation. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Givenness and Revelation. Oxford University Press, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

(Translator), Jeffrey Kosky, ed. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford University Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

(Translator), Jeffrey Kosky, ed. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford University Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Zahavi, Dan. Introspection and reflection. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199684830.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Rejecting the proposal that the aim of phenomenology is to provide refined descriptions of inner experiences, the chapter first discusses Husserl’s distinction between phenomenology and psychology. It next considers his employment of reflection, contrasts his position with that of Bergson, and outlines how Husserl operates with different concepts of reflection, and how a central task of phenomenological analysis is to account for the constitution of the object of consciousness. Phenomenological reflection does not only target experiential structures. It also investigates the object of experience, and the correlational a priori that holds between the experienced object and the different modes of givenness.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bergoffen, Debra. Simone de Beauvoir. Edited by Dan Zahavi. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755340.013.21.

Full text
Abstract:
Identifying herself as a philosopher, author, and feminist, Simone de Beauvoir took the phenomenological ideas of the lived body, situated freedom, intentionality, intersubjective vulnerability, and the existential ethical-political concepts of critique, responsibility, and justice, in new directions. She distinguished two moments in an ongoing dialogue of intentionality: the joys of disclosure and the desires of mastery. She disrupted the phenomenological account of perception, revealing its hidden ideological dimensions. Attending to the embodied experience of sex, gender, and age, she challenged the privilege accorded to the working body and introduced us to the unique humanity of the erotic body. Her categories of the Other and the Second Sex exposed the patriarchal norms that are naturalized in the taken-for-granted givens of the life-world. In translating the phenomenological-existential concepts of transcendence and freedom into an activist ethics of critique, hope, and liberation, her work continues to influence phenomenology, existentialism, and feminist theory and practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kaup, Monika. New Ecological Realisms. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474483094.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
What is the singular reality of humanistic objects of study? New Ecological Realism argues that our contemporary moment after the exhaustion of postmodernism presents an unprecedented opportunity to pursue this question. It proposes that the answer is found in a new concept of the real that hinges on, instead of denying, context, organization and form. New Ecological Realism showcases a context-based concept of the real, arguing that new realisms of complex and embedded wholes, actor-networks, and ecologies, rather than old realisms of isolated parts and things, represent the most promising escape from the impasses of constructivism and positivism. To achieve this, this study devotes equal attention to literature and theory. By pairing post-apocalyptic novels by Margaret Atwood, José Saramago, Octavia Butler, and Cormac McCarthy with new realist theories, this study shows that, just as new realist theories can illuminate post-apocalyptic fiction, post-apocalyptic fiction also embeds new theories of the real. Reassessing the recent revival of interest in ontology in contemporary theory, this study brings together four contemporary theories that formulate context-based realisms: Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory; Chilean neurophenomenologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela’s theories of autopoiesis and enactivism; German philosopher Markus Gabriel’s new ontology of fields of sense; French philosopher Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology of givenness and American philosopher Alphonso Lingis’s writings on passionate identification. Their shared emphasis on interconnectedness over individuation has gone unnoticed because these theories have never been considered together before.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Phenomenology of giveness"

1

Şan, Emre. "Phenomenological Crossings: Givenness and Event." In The Subject(s) of Phenomenology, 327–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Marbach, Eduard. "Reference to Something Identical in its Present Givenness: The Notion of “Implicit Consciousness”." In Contributions to Phenomenology, 105–23. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2239-1_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hackett, J. Edward. "Ross and Scheler on the Givenness and Unity of Value." In Phenomenology for the Twenty-First Century, 55–73. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55039-2_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ryba, Thomas. "Trinitarian Appropriations of the Transcendentals: Givenness and Intentionality in Levinas, Marion, and Tymieniecka." In Phenomenology/Ontopoiesis Retrieving Geo-cosmic Horizons of Antiquity, 439–63. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1691-9_34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Andrews, Michael F. "A Phenomenology of Ethics and Excess: Experiences of Givenness and Transcendence According to Edith Stein." In Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life, 119–31. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21124-4_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Marion, Jean-Luc. "Phenomenology." In The Rigor of Things, translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. Fordham University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823275755.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter provides an introduction to and summary of all of Marion’s phenomenological work. It also gives an account of why he turned to phenomenology in the first place and what role he considers it to play philosophically. Marion explains the notion of the phenomenological reduction and the importance of the category of givenness. He responds to some of the common objections to his work (including those of Derrida and Ricoeur). He summarizes the notion of the gift and its phenomenological significance. The chapter presents the implications of a phenomenology of givenness for a notion of the self as recipient of the phenomenon. Marion also reviews the notion of the saturated phenomenon and unfolds its implications. He discusses his relation to the thought of Levinas, Henry, Lacan, and Heidegger.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"The Phenomenology of Givenness." In Quiet Powers of the Possible, 40–64. Fordham University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780823264742-004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

MARION, JEAN-LUC. "The Phenomenology of Givenness." In Quiet Powers of the Possible, 40–64. Fordham University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt19rm9fx.6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Mandray, Sara. "Experience as an Excess of Givenness." In The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenologies and Organization Studies, 180—C9.P60. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192865755.013.11.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This chapter presents the post-metaphysical phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion: a phenomenology with the purpose of classifying the appearing of phenomena in a hierarchy according to their different degrees of givenness. From poor phenomena to the phenomenon of revelation, Marion questions our lack of concepts when facing the world as it appears. The Marionian gifted (echoing the transcendental subject) finds herself first called by a given word, in other words constituted by the given. This originary condition of the gifted leads Marion to investigate the paradoxical phenomena—or saturated phenomena—characterized by an excess in givenness which saturates our intelligibility. Saturated phenomena give themselves through the four dimensions which identify the phenomenon as a given in general: quantity (event, crisis), quality (idol), relation (flesh), and modality (icon). Saturation, this exception from a metaphysical point of view, becomes the norm of the post-metaphysical phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cassidy, Eoin. "11 Le phenomene erotique: Augustinian Resonances in Marion’s Phenomenology of Love." In Givenness and God, 201–19. Fordham University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780823291687-015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Phenomenology of giveness' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography