Relevant bibliographies by topics / Phimosis, congenital

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Books
  3. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Phimosis, congenital'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Phimosis, congenital.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Phimosis, congenital"

1

Jasaitienė, Daiva, Skaidra Valiukevičienė, Daiva Vaitkienė, Mindaugas Jievaltas, Vidmantas Barauskas, Inga Gudinavičienė, Ingolf Franke, and Harald Gollnick. "Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in pediatric and adult male patients with congenital and acquired phimosis." Medicina 44, no. 6 (June 17, 2008): 460. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina44060060.

Full text
Abstract:
Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus is a chronic inflammatory sclerotic and atrophic disease of unknown cause that predominantly affects male and female genital skin. This study was designed to evaluate histological characteristics of congenital and acquired phimoses among pediatric (n=60) and adult (n=60) male patients who were admitted for circumcision to the Clinics of Urology and Pediatric Surgery of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital between 2000 and 2003 and to determine the rate of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and other histological diagnoses among them. This study demonstrates that 45.1% of congenital and 62.3% of acquired phimoses show histological signs of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. The rate of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus was statistically significantly higher among patients with acquired than congenital phimosis. Boys with acquired narrowing of prepuce were statistically significantly 3.9 times more likely to develop lichen sclerosus et atrophicus than those with congenital phimosis. There were no statistically significant differences between rates of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and other dermatological diagnoses among pediatric and adult male patients if the type of phimosis (acquired or congenital) was considered. Histological features of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and other histological diagnoses in boys and men with phimosis were detected with equal frequency irrespective the age of the subjects. The rate of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus was similar among all boys (56.7%) and men (53.3%) treated for phimosis. Only the type of phimosis had a statistically significant influence on the rate of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and other histological diagnoses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

O'BRIEN, A., A. M. J. SHAPIRO, and J. D. FRANK. "Phimosis or congenital megaprepuce?" British Journal of Urology 73, no. 6 (June 1994): 719–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07570.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bölükbasi, A. "Phimosis or congenital megaprepuce?" British Journal of Urology 76, no. 1 (July 1995): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07856.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bright, S. R., and R. J. Mellanby. "Congenital phimosis in a cat." Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 6, no. 6 (December 2004): 367–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2003.12.006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pavone, Carlo, Daniela Abbadessa Manuela Usala, Grazia Mangiapane, Marcello Noto, Giovanna Scaduto, and Dario Passalacqua. "Circumcision in Nesbit Corporoplasty: A Mandatory Time? Our Experience on 158 Patients." Urologia Journal 79, no. 1 (January 2012): 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ru.2012.9019.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction The Nesbit procedure is the most common surgical technique to correct congenital or acquired penile curvature. It is a common opinion that this surgical procedure has to be completed with a circumcision to prevent foreskin necrosis or phimosis. According to our experience we believe that some procedural “tricks” could strongly reduce that mechanical and ischemic trauma on the foreskin responsible for these complications. Materials and Methods From 1988 to 2010 we selected 158 patients treated with Nesbit's corporoplasty. The procedure was recommended to patients who presented a penile curvature wider than 30° and reporting however some difficulty or pain at coitus, or to patients who complained about aesthetical problems (123 patients presented a La Peyronie disease and 35 presented a congenital curvature). Results Eleven patients underwent circumcision during surgery because of a pre-operative phimosis, or according to their own desire. Among the patients who did not undergo circumcision (147), paraphimosis was present in 3 patients. We reported only one case of curvature recurrence in a patient who had a sexual intercourse the day after surgery. We also had one case of hourglass effect in a congenital curvature. Discussion We believe that some tricks during Nesbit surgical procedure could prevent tissue and vascular trauma that give rise to tissue retraction, and consequently to phimosis and foreskin necrosis: a coronal incision to 0.5-1cm from the gland line would allow to let intact an adequate amount of reflection of skin (prepuce) bound of preputial skin reflection, maintaining good vascularity. The careful degloving with preparatory isolation of the dissection plan between dartos and Buck's fascia, can reduce vascular trauma of the fascia, minimizing bleeding and ensuring tissue vitality. Moreover, execution of only two hydraulics erections, after degloving and after correction, causes a minimal tissue stress. Conclusions Circumcision must not be considered a mandatory time in Nesbit procedure: on the contrary, mandatory is the respect of the anatomical structures surgically attacked to avoid preputial resection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rai, Sandeep B., and Raghu Shankar. "A RARE CAUSE OF URETHRAL OBSTRUCTION IN AN INFANT - CONGENITAL POSTERIOR URETHRAL POLYP." Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 04, no. 02 (June 2014): 147–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1703787.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract:Urethral polyp is a rare finding in young children. These are congenital fibroepithelial benign polyp in the prostatic urethra. They present with acute or intermittent urinary obstruction, hematuria or voiding dysfunction. Their diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion because of variability in presentation. Diagnosis can be made by ultrasonography or micturating cystourethrogram, however cystourethroscopy is confirmatory. Transurethral resection is possible in almost all the cases and recurrence is almost unknown. We report a case of this rare lesion in a male infant with a severe phimosis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Werner, Zachary, Ali Hajiran, and Osama Al-Omar. "Congenital Megaprepuce: Literature Review and Surgical Correction." Case Reports in Urology 2019 (May 14, 2019): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4584609.

Full text
Abstract:
Congenital megaprepuce (CMP) is a type of buried penis characterized by extensive redundancy and ballooning of the inner prepuce as a result of preputial stenosis and phimosis. The malformation typically presents with difficulty voiding, often requiring manual expression of stagnant urine. Multiple techniques have been reported for the treatment of CMP with varying levels of positive outcomes. The authors provide a review of published literature, in addition to describing the procedure and results of our surgical technique in three children aged eleven months, two years, and twelve years. The literature review was conducted using PubMed with keywords “congenital megaprepuce,” “megaprepuce,” “buried penis,” “CMP,” and “correction.” Results were then differentiated based on presence or absence of true congenital megaprepuce and the surgical correction thereof. Regarding our cases, all patients completed the procedure with excellent cosmesis and without complication. Our technique is shown to provide consistent, excellent esthetic outcome across a wide range of ages and may be replicated by others.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

D'Alessio, A., E. Piro, M. Brugnoni, and L. Abati. "Use of Preputial Skin as Cutaneous Graft after Nevus Excision." International Journal of Pediatrics 2010 (2010): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/951270.

Full text
Abstract:
We report a four-year-old boy with a nevus covering all the plantar side of his second finger on the left foot. He was also affected by congenital phimosis. Surgical excision of the nevus was indicated, but the skin defect would have been too large to be directly closed. The foreskin was taken as a full-thickness skin graft to cover the cutaneous defect of the finger. The graft intake was favourable and provided a functional repair with good aesthetic characteristic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Abdulkadir, A., and A. Abubakar. "Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum co-existing with phimosis: A case report and review of literature." Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research 15, no. 1 (2013): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1595-1103.141389.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ferdous, Shahana, Ranjit Ranjan Roy, Md Faysal Ahmmed, and Md Nahiduzzaman Shazzad. "Obstructive Nephropathy in Children – A Review." Bangladesh Medical Journal 46, no. 3 (July 16, 2019): 107–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v46i3.42252.

Full text
Abstract:
Obstructive nephropathy is any affection of the urinary tract characterized by impairment of urine flow through the tract and which, if left untreated, will cause progressive renal damage. Causes in children are congenital or acquired. Congenital causes are pelvi-ureteric junction obstructions, posterior urethral valves (PUV), urethral atresia, phimosis and meatal stenosis. The acquired causes are calculi, post-traumatic and post-inflammatory strictures and meatal stenosis. There are some manifestations like prune-belly syndrome, hydronephrosis and renal failure. Diagnostic investigations include ultrasonography, intravenous urography, cystography and renography. Advanced technologies have impacted on the treatment of the different lesions such as utero vesico-amniotic shunt and endoscopic valve ablation for PUV and minimally invasive techniques for urolithiasis. Nephrectomy may be indicated in a unilateral damaged kidney. Sometimes treatment may fail because of pretreatment irreversible renal damage. Such as end-stage renal failure is an indication for renal transplantation. So, proper treatment is essential to prevent end-stage renal failure. Bangladesh Med J. 2017 Sep; 46 (3): 107-113
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Phimosis, congenital"

1

Darwish, Ahmed A., and Kim A. R. Hutton. Disorders of the prepuce. Edited by David F. M. Thomas. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199659579.003.0122.

Full text
Abstract:
The foreskin is adherent to the glans and is non-retractile at birth. As the preputial adhesions separate the foreskin then gradually becomes retractile so that by three years of age the foreskin is at least partially retractile in 90% of boys. The term ‘physiological’ phimosis refers to a foreskin which is supple, unscarred, but persistently non-retractile. Less than 1% of boys with a physiological phimosis will have a persisting phimosis by the age of 17 years. ‘Pathological’ phimosis refers to scarring of the prepuce due to balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), a cicatrizing inflammatory skin condition of unknown aetiology. Paraphimosis is a rare condition in which the retracted prepuce becomes trapped behind the glans, leading to venous stasis and oedematous swelling. ‘Congenital’ megaprepuce is characterized by a capacious preputial sac, phimosis, and a relative deficiency of penile shaft skin. Surgical intervention is advisable for both functional and cosmetic reasons.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Phimosis, congenital"

1

Fahmy, Mohamed. "Phimosis and Paraphimosis." In Congenital Anomalies of the Penis, 245–50. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43310-3_38.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Genital anomalies." In Oxford Handbook of Genitourinary Medicine, HIV, and Sexual Health, edited by Laura Mitchell, Bridie Howe, D. Ashley Price, Babiker Elawad, and K. Nathan Sankar, 377–80. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198783497.003.0033.

Full text
Abstract:
Genital anomalies considers both congenital and acquired differences in genital anatomy in both men and women. Clinicians performing genital examinations will frequently encounter many of these in their practice, and within this chapter each anomaly is succinctly described and for many the appropriate management is subsequently outlined. In men, the following differences are included: epispadias, hypospadias, lymphocele, paraphimosis, Peyronie’s disease, priapism, phimosis, spermatoceles and epididymal cysts, urethral channels, and varicocele. In women: Bartholin gland pathology (cysts and abscesses), cervical polyps, Mullerian duct anomalies (vaginal agenesis, vaginal and uterine septae, unicornuate uterus and uterus didelphys), and urethral caruncles are outlined.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Phimosis, congenital' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography