Books: 'Piercing the veil of corporate entity'

1

Piercing the corporate veil. New York, N.Y: C. Boardman, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Institute, Pennsylvania Bar. Piercing the corporate veil. [Mechanicsburg, PA ]: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Yorsz, Stanley. Advanced piercing the corporate veil. [Mechanicsburg, Pa.]: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Yorsz, Stanley. Advanced piercing the corporate veil. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2013.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Tezuka, Hiroyuki. Piercing corporate structures in Japan. [Chicago]: American Bar Association, Section of Litigation, 1995.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Wilkinson, Andrew. Piercing the corporate veil and the Insovency Act 1986. London: Longman, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Clausen, Nis Jul. Legal entity under detailed and not detailed regulation: Exemplified through US and Danish case law. Odense: Odense Universitet, 1988.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Chatamarrasjid. Menyingkap tabir perseroan: Kapita selekta hukum perseroan = Piercing the corporate veil. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Moeremans, Daniel. Die Durchgriffshaftung bei Kapitalgesellschaften: Eine rechtvergleichende Untersuchung nach deutschem und argentinischem Recht. [Münster?: s.n.], 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Dongen, R. C. van. Identificatie in het rechtspersonenrecht: Rechtsvergelijkende beschouwingen over "piercing the corporate veil" in het interne en internationaal privatrecht van Nederland, Duitsland, Zwitserland, New York en Texas. Deventer: Kluwer, 1995.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Silva, Alexandre Couto. A aplicação da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica no direito brasileiro. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: GEN, Editora Forense, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Silva, Alexandre Couto. Aplicação da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica no direito brasileiro. São Paulo: Editora LTr, 1999.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Desconsideração da personalidade societária no direito brasileiro. São Paulo, SP, Brasil: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Koury, Suzy Elizabeth Cavalcante. A desconsideração da personalidade jurídica (disregard doctrine) e os grupos de empresas. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1993.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Coelho, Fábio Ulhoa. Desconsiderac̜ão da personalidade jurídica. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Yágüez, Ricardo de Angel. La doctrina del "levantamiento del velo" de la persona jurídica en la reciente jurisprudencia. 2nd ed. Madrid, España: Editorial Civitas, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Dobson, Juan M. El abuso de la personalidad jurídica (en el derecho privado). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Depalma, 1985.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Schmidt, Claudia. Der Haftungsdurchgriff und seine Umkehrung im internationalen Privatrecht: Eine systematische Untersuchung des direkten und des umgekehrten Haftungsdurchgriffs im internationalen Privatrecht Deutschlands, der Schweiz und Österreichs. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), 1993.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

The liability of the holding company for the debts of insolvent subsidiaries. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Widjaja, Gunawan. Risiko hukum pemilik, direksi & komisaris PT: Piercing the corporate veil : memberlakukan tanggung jawab pribadi pemegang saham, direksi & dewan komisaris menurut UU PT no. 40 thn 2007. 2nd ed. [Jakarta]: ForumSahabat, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Indonesia, ed. Risiko hukum pemilik, direksi & komisaris PT: Piercing the corporate veil : memberlakukan tanggung jawab pribadi pemegang saham, direksi & dewan komisaris menurut UU PT no. 40 thn 2007. 2nd ed. [Jakarta]: ForumSahabat, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

French, Derek, Stephen W. Mayson, and Christopher L. Ryan. 5. Corporate personality. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198778301.003.0005.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter deals with the legal personality of a company which is separate from its members, capable of owning property, entering into contracts, and being a party to legal proceedings. It considers the case Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, in which the courts affirmed separate corporate personality by rejecting attempts, on behalf of creditors, to impose liability for a failed company’s debts on its controlling shareholder. The consequences of separate corporate personality are also discussed, particularly with respect to a company’s human rights (or personal rights). In addition, the chapter examines the process known as ‘piercing the corporate veil’ in relation to the evasion principle; how an artificial entity can have legal personality; and a number of particularly significant court cases. Finally, it looks at corporate law theory and the issue of company linguistics.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

French, Derek. 5. Corporate personality. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815105.003.0005.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter deals with the legal personality of a company which is separate from its members, capable of owning property, entering into contracts and being a party to legal proceedings. It considers the case Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, in which the House of Lords affirmed separate corporate personality by rejecting attempts, on behalf of creditors, to impose liability for a failed company’s debts on its controlling shareholder. The consequences of separate corporate personality are also discussed, particularly with respect to a company’s human rights (or personal rights). In addition, the chapter examines the process known as ‘piercing the corporate veil’ in relation to the evasion principle; how an artificial entity can have legal personality; and a number of particularly significant court cases. Finally, it looks at corporate law theory and considers whether companies are grammatically singular or plural.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Cotter, Susan. Piercing the Corporate Veil. 2nd ed. Center for International Legal Studies, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Institute, Pennsylvania Bar, ed. Piercing the corporate veil. Mechanicsburg, PA: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2006.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Cotter, Susan. Piercing the Corporate Veil. Center for International Legal Studies, 1998.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Institute, Pennsylvania Bar, ed. Piercing the corporate veil. [Mechanicsburg, Pa.]: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

G, Green Christopher, Welsh Peter L, Kaden Gregory O, Simshauser Peter, and Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (1982- ), eds. Shareholder liability: Piercing the corporate veil & beyond. Boston, MA (Ten Winter Pl., Boston 02108-4751): MCLE, Inc., 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

G, Green Christopher, Welsh Peter L, Kaden Gregory O, Simshauser Peter, and Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (1982- ), eds. Shareholder liability: Piercing the corporate veil & beyond. Boston, MA (Ten Winter Pl., Boston 02108-4751): MCLE, Inc., 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Lezcano, Jose Maria. Piercing the Corporate Veil in Latin American Jurisprudence. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315732602.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Vandekerckhove, Karen. Piercing the Corporate Veil: A Transnational Approach (European Company Law) (European Company Law Series). Kluwer Law International, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Desconsideração da personalidade da pessoa jurídica: Visão crítica da jurisprudência. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Gama, Guilherme Calmon Nogueira da. and Brasil Deilton Ribeiro, eds. Desconsideração da personalidade da pessoa jurídica: Visão crítica da jurisprudência. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Lezcano, Jose Maria. Piercing the Corporate Veil in Latin American Jurisprudence: A Comparison with the Anglo-American Method. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Lezcano, Jose Maria. Piercing the Corporate Veil in Latin American Jurisprudence: A Comparison with the Anglo-American Method. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

The law relating to corporate groups. Sydney: The Federation Press, 1993.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Dignam, Alan, and John Lowry. 3. Lifting the veil. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198811831.003.0003.

Full text

Abstract:

Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. This chapter discusses ‘lifting the veil’, a phrase that refers to situations where the judiciary or the legislature have decided that the separation of corporate personality from the members must not be maintained. In this case, the veil of incorporation is said to be lifted. ‘Lifting’ is also known as ‘peeping’, ‘penetrating’, ‘piercing’, or ‘parting’. The chapter presents statutory examples of veil lifting, many of which involve corporate group structures and others involve straightforward shareholder limitation of liability issues. It also considers cases of veil lifting by the courts as well as classical veil lifting during the periods of 1897 to 1966, 1966 to 1989, and 1989 to the present. Three cases are highlighted: Adams v Cape Industries (1990), Chandler v Cape Plc (2012), and Prest v Petrodel Industries Ltd (2013). The chapter also examines claims of tortious liability, the liability of a parent company for personal injury, and commercial tort. Finally, it looks at the costs and benefits of limited liability.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Dignam, Alan, and John Lowry. 3. Lifting the veil. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198753285.003.0150.

Full text

Abstract:

Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. This chapter discusses ‘lifting the veil’, a phrase that refers to situations where the judiciary or the legislature have decided that the separation of corporate personality from the members must not be maintained. In this case, the veil of incorporation is said to be lifted. ‘Lifting’ is also known as ‘peeping’, ‘penetrating’, ‘piercing’, or ‘parting’. The chapter presents statutory examples of veil lifting, many of which involve corporate group structures and others involve straightforward shareholder limitation of liability issues. It also considers cases of veil lifting by the courts as well as classical veil lifting during the periods of 1897 to 1966, 1966 to 1989, and 1989 to the present. Three cases are highlighted: Creasey v Breachwood Motors Ltd (1993), Ord v Belhaven Pubs Ltd (1998), and Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2) (2001). The chapter also examines claims of tortious liability, the liability of a parent company for personal injury, and commercial tort. Finally, it looks at the costs and benefits of limited liability.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Moore, Imogen. 12. Mixed Topic Questions. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198745228.003.0012.

Full text

Abstract:

The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions and coursework. Each book includes typical questions, suggested answers with commentary, illustrative diagrams, guidance on how to develop your answer, suggestions for further reading, and advice on exams and coursework. This chapter looks at mixed topic questions and considers a variety of topics, including directors’ duties; shareholder remedies; de facto and shadow directors; corporate personality; lifting/piercing the veil of incorporation; pre-incorporation contracts; wrongful trading; disqualification; and the articles of association.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Hansmann, Henry, and Richard Squire. External and Internal Asset Partitioning. Edited by Jeffrey N. Gordon and Wolf-Georg Ringe. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743682.013.3.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter analyzes the economic consequences of external and internal asset partitioning, and it considers implications of this analysis for creditor remedies. External partitioning refers to the legal boundaries between business firms and their equity investors, while internal partitioning refers to the legal boundaries within corporate groups. The chapter begins by cataloguing the benefits and costs of corporate partitioning; it then employs this catalogue to analyze the relative economics of external and internal partitioning. Non-partitioning functions of subsidiaries are also identified. The chapter then considers whether cost-benefit analysis predicts how courts actually apply de-partitioning remedies, with particular emphasis on veil piercing and enterprise liability. The chapter concludes by arguing that courts should employ the distinction between external and internal partitioning when applying creditor remedies that disregard corporate partitions, and it identifies factors—in addition to whether a partition is internal or external—that courts should consider when deciding whether to de-partition.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten, and Michael Anderson Schillig. Comparative Company Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199572205.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

This book provides an exposition of company law from a comparative perspective. It analyses important policy issues in the area of company law, including the emergence and nature of the business corporation, EU company law, incorporation and corporate representation, agency problems in the firm, rights of stakeholders and shareholders, minority shareholder protection in corporate control transactions, legal capital, and piercing the corporate veil, as well as corporate insolvency and restructuring law. The book’s main focus is the law of public and private companies in the common law sense (the law of partnerships is referred to and taken into account as necessary). The book’s analysis encompasses the corporate laws of the US, the UK, Germany, and France, as well as the legislative measures adopted by the EU and the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. It includes edited and, where necessary, translated extracts from leading company case law. The cases are discussed and interpreted in the context of the national and European regulatory frameworks and in light of economic and legal theory, as well as legal history.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Hopt, Klaus J. Groups of Companies. Edited by Jeffrey N. Gordon and Wolf-Georg Ringe. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743682.013.30.

Full text

Abstract:

Groups of companies are common. The empirical data are heterogeneous. Agency problems arise between the controlling shareholder and the minority shareholders and between the shareholders and the creditors. Three regulatory models exist: regulation by general corporate and/or civil law (prototype: the UK); regulation by special group law (prototype: Germany); and regulation by areas of the law such as banking, competition, and tax. The main strategy is mandatory disclosure and group accounting. Related party transactions (including conflict of interest and tunneling) are dealt with by disclosure and consent requirements. In addition, appropriate standards for directors and controlling shareholders (corporate governance) have been developed. They become stricter, if insolvency is approaching. The concept of the shadow director extends liability to the controlling shareholder. Other mechanisms for creditor protection are indemnification, veil-piercing, subordination and substantive consolidation. A fair amount of international convergence exists as to shareholder protection, but not as to creditor protection.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic 'Piercing the veil of corporate entity'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles