To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Piezocisão.

Journal articles on the topic 'Piezocisão'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Piezocisão.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Al-Areqi, Marwan M., Elham S. Abu Alhaija, and Emad F. Al-Maaitah. "Effect of piezocision on mandibular second molar protraction." Angle Orthodontist 90, no. 3 (February 11, 2020): 347–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/080419-511.1.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the effects of piezocision on the rate of mandibular second molar protraction. Materials and Methods Thirty-one subjects (average age: 22.26 ± 5.63 years) who presented with at least one extracted mandibular first molar were selected to participate in the study. The subjects were subdivided into one of two groups, 22 molars each: group 1, where piezocision was performed immediately before molar protraction and group 2, where molar protraction was performed with no piezocision. Piezocision was performed by making two vertical incisions mesial and distal to the extraction space, and bone cuts were done with a length up to the mucogingival line at a depth of 3 mm. The rate of second molar protraction, duration of space closure, and level of interleukin-1-β (IL-1β) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) during the first month of space closure were recorded. Results During the first 2 months after surgery, the rates of second molar protraction were 1.26 ± 0.12 mm/month and 0.68 ± 0.19 mm/month in the piezocision and no piezocision groups, respectively (P < .001). Duration of lower first molar space closure was 9.61 ± 0.98 months in the piezocision group and 10.87 ± 1.52 months in the no piezocision group (P < .01). The level of IL-1β in GCF was higher in the piezocision group compared to the no piezocision group, up to 1 week after surgery (P = .02). Conclusions Although piezocision doubled the rate of second molar protraction during the first 2 months after surgery, overall second molar protraction was increased by only 1 month.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yi, Jianru, Jiani Xiao, Yu Li, Xiaobing Li, and Zhihe Zhao. "Efficacy of piezocision on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review." Angle Orthodontist 87, no. 4 (July 1, 2017): 491–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/01191-751.1.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of piezocision as an adjunctive procedure to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials that investigated the effectiveness of piezocision on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement were identified through electronic and manual searches. The literature search, study inclusion, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Results: Four eligible studies were included in this review. All studies reported accelerated tooth movement after piezocision, and three reported a significant reduction of treatment duration in the piezocision group. No deleterious effects on periodontal status, pain perception, satisfaction, root resorption, or anchorage control were reported in any studies. Conclusion: Based on currently available information, weak evidence supports that piezocision is a safe adjunct to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, at least in the short term. More high-quality clinical trials to determine the long-term effects and optimal protocol for piezocision are needed to draw more reliable conclusions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ileri, Zehra, Mehmet Akin, Emire Aybuke Erdur, Hatice Turk Dagi, and Duygu Findik. "Bacteremia after piezocision." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 146, no. 4 (October 2014): 430–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.06.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sakin, Caglar, and Ozlem Aylikci. "Piezocision-assisted canine distalization." Journal of Orthodontic Research 1, no. 2 (2013): 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2321-3825.116288.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Aksakalli, Sertac, Berra Calik, Burcak Kara, and Seref Ezirganli. "Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion." Angle Orthodontist 86, no. 1 (May 19, 2015): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/012215-49.1.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the extent of canine distalization and the transversal changes, postdistalization gingival indices, and mobility scores between patients who were undergoing orthodontic treatment involving upper premolar extraction with (experimental group) or without piezocision. Materials and Methods: Twenty maxillary canines of 10 patients were evaluated with split mouth design. Pre- and postdistalization dental casts were prepared and scanned with an orthodontic scanner to compare the extent of distalization and transversal changes between the two groups. The pre- and postdistalization gingival indices and mobility scores were also calculated. Results: Three-dimensional analysis of the models revealed significant differences in tooth movement (lesser anchorage loss and greater canine distalization) between the experimental and control groups. Furthermore, the distalization time was shortened in the experimental group. There were no differences in the transversal changes, pre- and postdistalization gingival indices, or mobility scores between groups. Conclusion: Piezocision-assisted distalization accelerates tooth movement, decreases the anchorage loss for posterior teeth, and does not induce any maxillary transversal change. Moreover, piezocision does not have any adverse effects on periodontal health.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Caruso, Silvia, Atanaz Darvizeh, Stefano Zema, Roberto Gatto, and Alessandro Nota. "Management of a Facilitated Aesthetic Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and Minimally Invasive Corticotomy." Dentistry Journal 8, no. 1 (February 15, 2020): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010019.

Full text
Abstract:
Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement has become a topical issue and the corticotomy seems to be the only effective and safe technique reported in the literature. Simultaneously, aesthetic orthodontic treatment with removable clear aligners has become commonly requested. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the management of facilitated aesthetic orthodontic treatment, a combined approach including piezocision corticotomy and clear aligners for orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic planning for traditional clear aligners should be modified to take advantage of the corticotomy technique in order to facilitate the most difficult orthodontic movements needed to achieve treatment completion, where each aligner will be used for four days rather than 15 days for a total time of four months. A corticotomy with a modified minimally invasive flapless piezocision technique should be performed in both jaws at the same time, before the time window of the orthodontic treatment, where the most difficult orthodontic movements are planned. Treatment planning where difficult orthodontic movements, such as anterior open-bite closure and extraction space closure, are easily managed with clear aligners and are presented as examples of facilitated aesthetic orthodontic treatment application. The combination between aesthetic treatment with clear aligners and modified piezocision corticotomy, if carefully planned, seems to represent a synergy that achieves the current goals of orthodontic treatment. The primary objectives of this combination should be facilitating difficult orthodontic movements and reducing treatment duration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Abdul-Aziz, Ahmed I., and Wael M. Refai. "Three-Dimensional Prospective Evaluation of Piezocision-Assisted and Conventional Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Controlled Clinical Trial." Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 7, no. 1 (January 5, 2019): 127–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.021.

Full text
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Piezocision-assisted orthodontics (PAO) is considered one of the modern techniques aiming at reducing the treatment time and overcoming some limitations of orthodontic treatment. The use of piezocision as an adjunct in the treatment of posterior crossbite is limited, so additional research in this area is required. AIM: To three-dimensionally compare the skeletal and dental effects produced by piezocision-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (PARME) and conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective controlled study comprised 14 consecutive non-syndromic patients with posterior crossbite. In 7 patients (mean age = 16.1 ± 0.3 years), PARME was used to correct the crossbite; whereas in the remaining 7 (mean age = 15.9 ± 0.5 years), RME was done. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed before expansion (T1) and 3 months later after expansion (T2) to compare the skeletal and dental effects produced by the two expansion techniques. Transverse skeletal, dentolinear, and dentoangular variables at the level of maxillary first and second premolars and maxillary first molars were measured and compared within and between groups using the appropriate statistical test. RESULTS: For the transverse skeletal variables, PARME showed a non-significant increase; whereas, RME showed a significant increase. Regarding the dentolinear measurements, a significant increase in coronal widths and an insignificant increase in apical widths was seen in PARME, whereas, the RME showed a non-significant increase for both coronal and apical widths. Non-significant decreases (protrusion of teeth) in the dentoangular measurements were seen in both groups. Between-group comparisons showed a non-significant difference except for the dentolinear coronal widths. CONCLUSION: PARME is effective in treating posterior crossbite. Because of the more dental expansion produced by PARME as compared to the conventional RME, PARME should be limited only to mild or moderate not severe forms of palatal constriction. The available evidence regarding the effectiveness of corticotomy- and/or piezocision-assisted maxillary expansion for correction of posterior crossbite is limited and inadequate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Charavet, Carole, Geoffrey Lecloux, Nastasia Jackers, Adelin Albert, and France Lambert. "Piezocision-assisted orthodontic treatment using CAD/CAM customized orthodontic appliances: a randomized controlled trial in adults." European Journal of Orthodontics 41, no. 5 (January 16, 2019): 495–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy082.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of piezocision (surgical protocol with sutures) in orthodontic treatment using CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) customized orthodontic appliances. Design The study is designed as a parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Setting University Hospital. Ethical approval The study was approved by the ethic committee of the University Hospital Liege, Belgium. Subjects and methods This RCT was conducted on 24 adult patients requiring orthodontic treatment to release mild overcrowding. Patients were all treated with a customized appliance and randomly assigned by means of sealed envelopes containing group codes to either a test group treated with piezocision or a control group without any further treatment. A blinded orthodontist validated appliance removal or further adjustments based on the model study. Outcome measures The overall treatment time and the time between archwire changes were recorded. Moreover, clinical and radiological features such as tooth resorption, gingival recessions, and the presence of scars were evaluated. Results A total of 24 patients (12 control and 12 test) completed the study. The overall treatment time was significantly shorter in the test group than the control group. Likewise, the time difference between all arch changes was significantly lower when piezocision was performed, except for the first arch at the mandible and the last arches at both maxillae. During the fine-tuning phase, no significant difference was found between the two groups. All periodontal and radiographic parameters remained stable from the start to the end of treatment in both the groups. However, minor scars were found in 66 per cent cases. Limitations This trial was a single-centre trial. Conclusions Piezocision seems to be an effective method to accelerate orthodontic treatment in cases of mild overcrowding. However, the effect was only observed during the alignment phase and a greater efficiency was found in the maxilla. The technique may be contraindicated in patients with a high smile line since the risk of slight scarring exists. Registration ClinicalTrails.gov (Identifier: NCT03406130)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tapia, M. E., J. Jofre, M. Carrasco, and J. Barra. "Accelerated orthodontic treatment with piezocision procedure." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 44 (October 2015): e296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.348.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hatrom, Abdulkarim A., Khalid H. Zawawi, Reem M. Al-Ali, Hanadi M. Sabban, Talal M. Zahid, Ghassan A. Al-Turki, and Ali H. Hassan. "Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction:." Angle Orthodontist 90, no. 5 (March 26, 2020): 648–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/092719-615.1.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the amount of en-masse retraction with or without piezocision corticotomy, to assess the type of tooth movement, to evaluate root integrity after retraction, and to record reported pain levels. Materials and Methods This randomized, controlled clinical trial included 26 orthodontic patients requiring premolar extraction. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) an extraction with piezocision corticotomy group (PCG) and (2) an extraction-only group, which served as the control group (CG). Cone-beam computed tomography images were acquired before and 4 months after the initiation of en-masse retraction utilizing miniscrews. The following variables were assessed: the amount of en-masse retraction, incisor inclination, incisor and canine root resorption, and patient-reported pain. Results Twelve and 11 participants completed the entire study in the PCG and CG, respectively. The amount of en-masse retraction was significantly greater in the PCG compared to the CG (mean = 4.8 ± 0.57 mm vs 2.4 ± 0.33 mm, respectively [P < .001]). There was also significantly less tipping and root resorption of incisors in the PCG (P < .05). The reported pain was significantly higher on the first day in the PCG compared to the CG (P < .001); however, it became similar between the groups after 24 hours. Conclusions Piezocision corticotomy enhanced the amount of en-masse retraction two times more with less root resorption. However, future studies are required to assess the long-term effects of this technique.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Elkalza, Ahmed. "Evaluation of piezocision in rapid canine retraction." Egyptian Orthodontic Journal 51, no. 6 (June 1, 2017): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/eos.2017.78360.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Sathyanarayana, Haritha Pottipalli, Bhadrinath Srinivasan, Vignesh Kailasam, and Sridevi Padmanabhan. "Corticotomy and piezocision in rapid canine retraction." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 150, no. 2 (August 2016): 209–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Khoo, Edmund, Sarah Alansari, and Jeanne Nervina. "Piezocision and root resorption: A biased conclusion?" American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 151, no. 6 (June 2017): 1020–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Milano, Francesco, Serge Dibart, Lorenzo Montesani, and Laura Guerra. "Computer-Guided Surgery Using the Piezocision Technique." International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 34, no. 4 (July 2014): 523–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.1741.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Songa, Vajra Madhuri, Narendra Dev Jampani, Lahari Buggapati, and Sowjanya Mittapally. "Piezocision: a Periodontally Accelerated Orthodontic Tooth Movement Technique." Indian Journal of Contemporary Dentistry 3, no. 1 (2015): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2320-5962.2015.00013.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Dibart, Serge, Elif Keser, and Donald Nelson. "Piezocision™-assisted orthodontics: Past, present, and future." Seminars in Orthodontics 21, no. 3 (September 2015): 170–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.06.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Keser, Elif I., and Serge Dibart. "Sequential piezocision: A novel approach to accelerated orthodontic treatment." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 144, no. 6 (December 2013): 879–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.12.014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Bakathir, Manal, Ali Hassan, and Maha Bahammam. "Piezocision as an adjunct to orthodontic treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite." Saudi Medical Journal 38, no. 4 (April 1, 2017): 425–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.4.16390.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Abbas, Noha Hussein, Noha Ezzat Sabet, and Islam Tarek Hassan. "Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 149, no. 4 (April 2016): 473–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.029.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Mordente, Carolina Morsani, Dauro Douglas Oliveira, Leena Palomo, Natália Couto Figueiredo, Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta, and Rodrigo Villamarim Soares. "Do alveolar corticotomy or piezocision affect TAD stability? A preliminary study." Seminars in Orthodontics 25, no. 2 (June 2019): 124–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2019.05.004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Cassetta, M., and M. Ivani. "The accuracy of computer-guided piezocision: a prospective clinical pilot study." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 46, no. 6 (June 2017): 756–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1273.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Kernitsky, Jeremy, Donald Nelson, and Serge Dibart. "Assessment of Maxillary Expansion by Piezocision-Assisted Orthodontics: A Pilot Study." International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 41, no. 4 (July 2021): e129-e138. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.5533.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Viwattanatipa, Nita, and Satadarun Charnchairerk. "The effectiveness of corticotomy and piezocision on canine retraction: A systematic review." Korean Journal of Orthodontics 48, no. 3 (2018): 200. http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.200.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Hou, Hsin-Yu, Chung-Hsing Li, Min-Chia Chen, Pei-Yi Lin, Wei-Chung Liu, Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai, and Ren-Yeong Huang. "A novel 3D-printed computer-assisted piezocision guide for surgically facilitated orthodontics." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 155, no. 4 (April 2019): 584–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.11.010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Dibart, S., C. Yee, J. Surmenian, J. D. Sebaoun, S. Baloul, E. Goguet-Surmenian, and A. Kantarci. "Tissue response during Piezocision-assisted tooth movement: a histological study in rats." European Journal of Orthodontics 36, no. 4 (November 19, 2013): 457–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt079.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Rekhi, Umar, Raisa Queiroz Catunda, and Monica Prasad Gibson. "Surgically accelerated orthodontic techniques and periodontal response: a systematic review." European Journal of Orthodontics 42, no. 6 (January 15, 2020): 635–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz103.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary Background Reduction in orthodontic treatment time is gaining popularity due to patient demands. Several new techniques of acceleratory orthodontic treatment have been introduced to effectively treat the malocclusion in a shorter time period with minimal adverse effects. Objective The objective of this systematic review is to critically evaluate the potential effect of accelerated surgically assisted orthodontic techniques on periodontal tissues. Materials and methods Electronic databases used to perform the search were Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and hand searching of the literature was also performed. Selection criteria Only randomized control trials (RCTs) that assessed the relationship between accelerated surgically assisted orthodontic techniques and its effects on periodontium were included. Data collection and analysis The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist tool (2016) was used to assess the finally selected studies. Among these studies, five evaluated corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics, two tested accelerated tooth movement with piezocision, one compared corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics with piezocision, and one studied the effects of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics. The duration of these studies was relatively short and had moderate to high risk of bias. Results Literature search identified 225 records from 5 databases and 50 articles from the partial grey literature (Google scholar) search. Finally, nine eligible RCTs were included in the review. Limitations Most of the included studies were of a high risk of bias due to high experimental heterogeneity and small sample size. Long-term follow-up of the periodontal response to these interventions was also lacking. Conclusions There is an absence of evidence considering the lack of long-term follow-up and small sample size therefore, the results of this review should be carefully interpreted. Implications Due to the need for more studies with less risk of bias, these techniques should be implemented in dental practice with caution. With stronger evidence, the study may be confirmed to provide quicker desired results for orthodontic patients. Registration This study protocol was not registered. Funding No funding was obtained for this systematic review.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Gandedkar, Narayan H., Oyku Dalci, and M. Ali Darendeliler. "The past and present research at the University of Sydney’s Discipline of Orthodontics." APOS Trends in Orthodontics 11 (July 9, 2021): 90–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/apos_77_2021.

Full text
Abstract:
The University of Sydney’s Discipline of Orthodontics has been actively pursuing research in the areas of root resorption, sleep apnea, magnets in orthodontics, implants, acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), and remote monitoring (RM). Our research has shed light on many specific factors that influence orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). We also explored the effects of some of the most discussed acceleration interventions on OTM and OIIRR, such as vibration, micro-osteoperforations, piezocision, low-level laser therapy, light emitting diode, light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, and pharmacological substances. Further, we have researched into maximizing orthopedic treatment outcomes of maxillary deficient children with use of intraoral force application with utilization of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander. We are currently trialing use of RM to facilitate orthodontic services in the public dental clinics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Patterson, Braydon M., Oyku Dalci, Alexandra K. Papadopoulou, Suman Madukuri, Jonathan Mahon, Peter Petocz, Axel Spahr, and M. Ali Darendeliler. "Effect of piezocision on root resorption associated with orthodontic force: A microcomputed tomography study." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 151, no. 1 (January 2017): 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.032.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Cassetta, Michele, and Federica Altieri. "L’utilizzo combinato della computer-guided piezocision e degli allineatori trasparenti: uno studio clinico prospettico." Dental Cadmos 85, no. 09 (November 2017): 579. http://dx.doi.org/10.19256/d.cadmos.09.2017.06.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Mheissen, Samer, Haris Khan, and Shadi Samawi. "Is Piezocision effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis." PLOS ONE 15, no. 4 (April 22, 2020): e0231492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231492.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Charavet, Carole, Dorien Van Hede, Sandy Anania, Nathalie Maes, and France Lambert. "Multilevel biological responses following piezocision to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: A study in rats." Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists 8, no. 3 (September 2019): 100–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2019.07.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Strippoli, Julien, Matthieu Schmittbuhl, Robert Durand, Pierre Rompré, Jack Turkewicz, René Voyer, and Clarice Nishio. "Impact of piezocision-assisted orthodontics on root resorption and alveolar bone: a prospective observational study." Clinical Oral Investigations 25, no. 7 (May 26, 2021): 4341–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03282-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Subrahmanya, Ravi, Jacob T. Kunnath, Harnoor Dhillon, Varthika Kumari, and Waliullah Hamidi. "Clinical and Biochemical Evaluation of Rate of Canine Retraction Following Piezocision through a Recently Extracted Site." World Journal of Dentistry 11, no. 4 (2020): 316–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1730.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Charavet, Carole, Geoffrey Lecloux, Annick Bruwier, Bart Vandenberghe, Michel Le Gall, and France Lambert. "Selective piezocision-assisted orthodontic treatment combined with minimally invasive alveolar bone regeneration: A proof-of-concept." International Orthodontics 16, no. 4 (December 2018): 652–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.09.021.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Rathod, Nirali, SonaliVijay Deshmukh, Sanket Agarkar, Lakshmi Shetty, Sandeep Jethe, and JayeshS Rahalkar. "Comparative evaluation of speed of orthodontic tooth movement with or without piezocision technique: An In vivo study." Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization 11, no. 2 (2019): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jicdro.jicdro_20_19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Yashwant, AniruddhV, JinsaN Joseph, AShanaj Doulath, and Pratebha Balu. "A modified protocol for periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics using piezocision and platelet.rich fibrin in accelerating extraction space closure." Journal of Dental Research and Review 8, no. 1 (2021): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_91_20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Charavet, Carole, Geoffrey Lecloux, Nastasia Jackers, Nathalie Maes, and France Lambert. "Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following a piezocision-assisted versus conventional orthodontic treatments: a randomized controlled trial in adults." Clinical Oral Investigations 23, no. 12 (April 6, 2019): 4355–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02887-z.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Çağlı Karcı, İlknur, and Zeliha Müge Baka. "Assessment of the effects of local platelet-rich fibrin injection and piezocision on orthodontic tooth movement during canine distalization." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 160, no. 1 (July 2021): 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.029.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Yamaguchi, Masaru, and Shinichi Fukasawa. "Is Inflammation a Friend or Foe for Orthodontic Treatment?: Inflammation in Orthodontically Induced Inflammatory Root Resorption and Accelerating Tooth Movement." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 5 (February 27, 2021): 2388. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052388.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to provide a review on the role of inflammation in orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) and accelerating orthodontic tooth movement (AOTM) in orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) is stimulated by remodeling of the periodontal ligament (PDL) and alveolar bone. These remodeling activities and tooth displacement are involved in the occurrence of an inflammatory process in the periodontium, in response to orthodontic forces. Inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins (PGs), interleukins (Ils; IL-1, -6, -17), the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α superfamily, and receptor activator of nuclear factor (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) are increased in the PDL during OTM. OIIRR is one of the accidental symptoms, and inflammatory mediators have been detected in resorbed roots, PDL, and alveolar bone exposed to heavy orthodontic force. Therefore, these inflammatory mediators are involved with the occurrence of OIIRR during orthodontic tooth movement. On the contrary, regional accelerating phenomenon (RAP) occurs after fractures and surgery such as osteotomies or bone grafting, and bone healing is accelerated by increasing osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Recently, tooth movement after surgical procedures such as corticotomy, corticision, piezocision, and micro-osteoperforation might be accelerated by RAP, which increases the bone metabolism. Therefore, inflammation may be involved in accelerated OTM (AOTM). The knowledge of inflammation during orthodontic treatment could be used in preventing OIIRR and AOTM.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Ahmed, Omneya, Naglaa El Kilani, Samir Ibrahim, Ahmed Salama, and Ghada Khalifa. "Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Piezocision Corticotomy with Bone Graft Guided By 3D-Surgical Template in Maxillary Protrusion (comparative study)." Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls 7, no. 1 (July 1, 2020): 447–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2020.18874.1201.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Khalil, Rehab, Waleed Abbas, Waleed Refaat, and Ahmed Ramadan. "Evaluation of bone thickness changes associated with en masse retraction facilitated by corticotomy and piezocision using cone beam computed tomography." Egyptian Orthodontic Journal 54, no. 12 (December 10, 2018): 69–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/eos.2018.77149.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Khalil, Rehab, Waleed Abbas, Waleed Refaat, and Ahmed Ramadan. "Comparative study of the rate of tooth movement between corticotomy and piezocision to facilitate en masse retraction in bimaxillary protrusion." Egyptian Orthodontic Journal 54, no. 12 (December 21, 2018): 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/eos.2018.77157.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Gibreal, Omar, Mohammad Y. Hajeer, and Bassel Brad. "Efficacy of piezocision-based flapless corticotomy in the orthodontic correction of severely crowded lower anterior teeth: a randomized controlled trial." European Journal of Orthodontics 41, no. 2 (June 20, 2018): 188–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy042.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Raj, Subash, Kamdev Praharaj, Ashish Barik, Kaushik Patnaik, Annuroopa Mahapatra, Devapratim Mohanty, Neelima Katti, Debasish Mishra, and Subhashree Panda. "Evaluation and Comparison of Periodontal Status and Rate of Canine Retraction With and Without Piezocision-Facilitated Orthodontics: A Randomized Controlled Trial." International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 40, no. 1 (January 2020): e19-e26. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.3968.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Al Imam, Ghaith, Mowaffak A Ajaj, Mohammad Y. Hajeer, Yaser Al-Mdalal, and Eyad Almashaal. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial." Dental and Medical Problems 56, no. 4 (December 3, 2019): 385–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/dmp/110432.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Al-Attar, Ali M., Samher Al-Shaham, and Mushriq Abid. "Perception of Iraqi Orthodontists and Patients toward Accelerated Orthodontics." International Journal of Dentistry 2021 (April 29, 2021): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5512455.

Full text
Abstract:
Background/Purpose. In the literature, no consensus about the duration of orthodontic treatment has been reached out. This study aimed to identify orthodontist’s and patient’s perception about the time of orthodontic treatment and their willingness to undergo and pay for various acceleration techniques and procedures. Materials and Methods. An electronic survey was conducted from August to October 2020. The questionnaire consisted of 20 multiple choice questions which was designed and emailed to members of the Iraqi Orthodontic Society and self-administered to patients in several orthodontic centers in Baghdad. The questionnaire included questions about the perception toward the duration of orthodontic treatment, approval of different procedures used to reduce treatment time, and how much fee increment they are able to pay for various techniques and appliances. Descriptive and chi-square test statistics were used, and the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 . Results. The response rate was 78.7%. The willingness for additional techniques and procedures was rated in the following order: customized appliances: 50.8% orthodontists and 38.4% patients, followed by intraoral vibrating devices: 49.2% orthodontists and 38.1% patients, piezocision: 10.2% orthodontists and 8.2% patients, and corticotomies: 8.1% orthodontists and 5.9% patients. Most orthodontists were willing to pay up to 40% of treatment income for the acceleration procedure, while the payment of patients was up to 20%. Conclusion. Both orthodontists and patients were interested in techniques that can decrease the treatment duration. Noninvasive accelerating procedures were more preferable by orthodontists and patients than invasive surgical procedures.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Umeh, O. D., I. G. Isiekwe, O. O. DaCosta, O. O. Sanu, I. L. Utomi, and M. Izuka. "Attitude and perception of orthodontic patients to orthodontic treatment time and accelerated orthodontics." African Journal of Oral Health 9, no. 2 (October 9, 2020): 28–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajoh.v9i2.2.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the a􀄴itude and perception of orthodontic patients to the duration of orthodontic treatment and the procedures for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The study population was made up of patients undergoing fixed appliance orthodontic treatment at the Orthodontic Unit of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. A convenience sampling technique was used and data collection was via selfadministered questionnaires and an information sheet. The questionnaires assessed patients' knowledge of accelerated orthodontic procedures as well as their perception of orthodontic treatment time and willingness to undergo some accelerated orthodontic treatment procedures. The procedures evaluated included corticotomy, piezocision, micro-osteoperforation, laser therapy, local administration of injections and use of vibrations.Results: One hundred orthodontic patients (n=100, adolescents, 46%; adults, 54%) were surveyed comprising 36 males and 64 females. Most of the participants (88%) had never heard of accelerated orthodontics. A majority of respondents (75%) believed that orthodontic treatment time was too long, and were willing to undergo additional procedures to reduce treatment time (81%). Subjects' willingness to undergo the procedures were inversely proportional to the degree of its invasiveness for all groups, with at least a third of the patients willing to accept a 10% increase in treatment fees for a reduction in treatment time across all techniques surveyed.Conclusion: The orthodontic patients surveyed considered treatment time protracted and were interested in undergoing adjunctive orthodontic procedures to accelerate tooth movement, with a consequent increase in treatment cost. They, however, had a limited knowledge of the different methods of accelerating orthodontic treatment. Key words: Accelerated orthodontics, orthodontic treatment time
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

León, Pilar, and Angela Domínguez. "Laser therapy and biochemical markers in the acceleration of orthodontic dental movement: a review of the literature." Revista Estomatología 21, no. 2 (September 29, 2017): 26–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/re.v21i2.5763.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this review is to identifyknown and controversial relevant aspects of the role of laser application and biochemical markersduring accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Biochemical markers that mediate acceleration oforthodontic tooth movement were identified in this review, and also was found that this accelerationof dental movement is possible due to the bone functional properties and its ability to deposition(mediated by osteoblasts) and bone resorption (mediated by osteoclasts). For each of these processesexist biochemical markers that can be measured in serum or urine. Bone formation markers arecollagen and non-collagenous proteins while pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline are resorptionmarkers. There are numerous mechanisms to accelerate tooth movement described in the literature;surgical as corticotomy, insights intramedullary piezocision and surgery first, pharmacological asprostaglandins and D vitamin, and physical as pulsatile stimuli and laser therapy. The purpose ofall of them is to accelerate the process and to have shorter orthodontic treatment. The lasertherapy has been reported as a safe and effective alternative to accelerate tooth movement and theireffects on cell populations involved in bone metabolism and pain have been evaluated in animalstudies and in humans, showing good results to reduce the total orthodontic treatment time andhaving less pain sensation after placement of the arches used in the different stages oftreatment.We concluded that nowadays there is no randomized controlled clinical trials published toevaluate the application of these biochemical markers in the process of acceleration of bonemetabolism during orthodontic treatment with the application of low intensity laser (GaAlAs)considered as an effective tool to increase the speed of tooth movement and to reduce pain afteractivation of orthodontic arches. Key words: Tooth movement, Biochemical markers, Low intensitylaser. Key words: Tooth movement, Biochemical markers, Low intensity laser.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Alvarez, Maria Antonia, Alejandra Mejia, Daniela Alzate, Diego Rey, Marcos Ioshida, Juan Fernando Aristizabal, Hector F. Rios, et al. "Buccal bone defects and transversal tooth movement of mandibular lateral segments in patients after orthodontic treatment with and without piezocision: A case-control retrospective study." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 159, no. 3 (March 2021): e233-e243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Fu, T., S. Liu, H. Zhao, M. Cao, and R. Zhang. "Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Journal of Dental Research 98, no. 13 (October 7, 2019): 1469–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034519878412.

Full text
Abstract:
Doctors and patients attempt to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement with a minimally invasive surgery approach. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence of accelerated tooth movement in minimally invasive surgery and the adverse effects from it. A systematic search of the literature was performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Medline and was complemented by a manual search until February 2019. The inclusion criteria were prospective clinical studies of patients treated with a fixed appliance, and the intervention was accelerated orthodontic treatment with minimally invasive surgery. Nineteen articles (538 participants) were included in the review: 9 studies assessed the rate of upper canine movement; 5 considered the treatment time; 1 evaluated the en masse retraction time; and 4 studied adverse effects. We performed a meta-analysis for the rate of canine movement and treatment time and described the results for the adverse effects in a systematic review. The results of the subgroup analysis according to micro-osteoperforation and piezocision were included in the study. No accelerated tooth movement was found in the micro-osteoperforation group. After flapless corticotomy procedures, increased tooth movement rates were identified by weighted mean differences of 0.63 (95%CI = 0.22, 1.03, P = 0.003) and 0.64 (95% CI, −25 to 1.53; P = 0.16) for 1 and 2 mo, respectively. The mean treatment time was 68.42 d (95% CI, −113.19 to −23.65; P = 0.003) less that than for minimally invasive surgery. Moreover, no significant adverse effect was found. Because of the high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis, the results must be validated by additional large-sample multicenter clinical trials. There is not sufficient evidence to support that the single use of micro-osteoperforation could accelerate tooth movement, and there is only low-quality evidence to prove that flapless corticotomy could accelerate tooth movement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography