Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Pigeonpea

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Pigeonpea'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 7 September 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Pigeonpea.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Pigeonpea"

1

Ramakrishna, A., C. K. Ong, and S. L. N. Reddy. "Canopy Duration and Structure of Pigeonpea Intercropped with Upland Rice." Experimental Agriculture 28, no. 3 (July 1992): 295–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s001447970001989x.

Full text

Abstract:

SummaryInteractions between upland rice and three phenologically distinct pigeonpea cultivars were examined on a medium deep Vertisol. The productivity of each intercrop component and its respective sole crop was determined in terms of a crop performance ratio (CPR). The extra-early pigeonpea cultivar recorded the largest partial CPR of grain followed by early and medium genotypes. Spreading genotypes had a larger partial CPR than semi-compact genotypes. However, the CPR of intercropped rice was less (0.65–0.69) with spreading pigeonpeas but exceeded unity with compact types. The canopy structure of pigeonpea appeared to be more important than differences in phenology. A large range of light transmission coefficients (K) existed in pigeonpea (from 0.45 to 0.78) but it is argued that a further reduction in K may not be necessary since intercropped rice yield was unaffected even with a K of 0.64. The relative height of intercropped pigeonpea and upland rice may also determine competitive ability since rice is very sensitive to low light and shading, particularly during the reproductive phase.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Amusa, Oluwafemi, Fidelis Etuh Okpanachi, Samuel Chimezie Onyeka, Jonathan Samson Damilola, Elizabeth Oluwaseun Olatunji, Liasu Adebayo Ogunkanmi, and Bolanle Olufunmilayo Oboh. "Identification of potential agronomic lines among Nigerian pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) accessions for crop improvement." Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas 39, E (December 22, 2022): 4–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.22267/rcia.202239e.192.

Full text

Abstract:

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) is a grain legume crop from the tropics and subtropics cultivated for its highly nutritious seeds. Relatively low yields have been observed among African accession with little information on germplasm performance. Therefore, it is needed to identify resilient germplasm, varieties or accessions to improve agronomic performance. This study assessed the morphological variability among selected accessions of Nigerian pigeonpea to identify potential lines for agronomic improvement. A total of 52 Nigerian pigeonpea accessions were evaluated using 10 qualitative and 13 quantitative morphological traits. They were planted using a completely randomised design. Yield performance, trait correlation, principal component (PC), and cluster analysis were used to identify potential breeding lines. The study revealed a wide variability among pigeonpea accessions with both qualitative and quantitative traits. The 52 pigeonpeas were clustered into three major groups. Four principal components with eigenvalue > 1 accounted for 68.95% of the total variation observed. The first PC accounted for 30.13% with yield components, which include days to 50% flowering, plant height, days to 50% maturity, and vigour at 50% flowering as major contributors. These traits also showed strong significant correlations between themselves. Hence, they can be improved simultaneously. The study identified several potential accessions based on performance that can be selected for multilocational evaluations and crop improvement.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Upadhyaya, H. D., K. N. Reddy, C. L. L. Gowda, and Sube Singh. "Identification and evaluation of vegetable type pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in the world germplasm collection at ICRISAT genebank." Plant Genetic Resources 8, no. 2 (May 10, 2010): 162–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479262110000122.

Full text

Abstract:

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) seed harvested while it is immature is a nutritious vegetable and forms a substitute for green pea [Pisum sativum (L.)]. Using the characterization data of more than 12,000 accessions conserved at ICRISAT genebank, Patancheru, India, 105 accessions were selected for important traits of vegetable pigeonpea (mature pod length>6 cm, seeds per pod>5 and 100-seed weight>15 g) and evaluated for these traits during 2007–08. From the initial evaluation, 51 accessions were identified as vegetable type and further evaluated for traits of vegetable pigeonpea during 2008–09 to identify most promising accessions. ICP 13831 produced longest immature pods (10.3 cm), ICP 13828 had maximum number of seeds per pod (5.9) and ICP 12746 produced larger seeds (44.8 g/100 seeds). Highest percentage of total soluble sugars (9.7%) was recorded in immature seeds of ICP 13413. ICP 15143 followed by ICP 15186 recorded more dry pods per plant and seed yield per plant. Performance of ICP 12184, ICP 13413, ICP 14085 and ICP 15169 was better than that of the best control for pod length, seeds per pod, soluble sugars and protein content. Cluster analysis based on scores of first five principal components resulted in three clusters that differed significantly for days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity, shelling percentage and soluble sugars. Important traits of vegetable pigeonpea such as immature pod length, seeds per pod, seed soluble sugars and protein content had shown strong positive correlation. Caribbean and Eastern Africa were found as the best source regions for vegetable pigeonpea. Evaluation of selected accessions at potential locations in different countries was suggested to identify vegetable pigeonpeas suitable for different regions and for use in crop improvement programs.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

S, MURUGESAN, MURUGAN E, and NADARAJAN N. "BREEDING FOR IMPROVED PLANT TYPE IN PIGEONPEA." Madras Agricultural Journal 84, January (1997): 12–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.29321/maj.10.a00830.

Full text

Abstract:

An attempt was made to breed for improved plant type in pigeonpen by crossing two contrasting parents viz. Vamban-I and Gulbarga-1. The F2 population clearly segregated into four distinct classes of phenotypes (plant types) in the ratio of 50 intermediate erect tall: 14 compact dwarf in the early segregants and 15 tall spreading: 1 compact bushy in the late segregants indicating that the plant type in pigeonpea was controlled by interaction of two pairs of non-allelic linkage blocks designated as DTCLSI and TALS2 and their respective allelic blocks as dtclsl and tais2.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Singh, K. A., and Mahendra Pal. "Productivity of pigeonpea-wheat cropping systems." Journal of Agricultural Science 110, no. 3 (June 1988): 645–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600082253.

Full text

Abstract:

SummaryStudies on productivity of pigeonpea-wheat cropping systems at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during 1984–6 revealed that wheat following summer pigeonpea and given 120 kg N/ha produced 4–93, as compared with 451 t grain/ha when it succeeded kharif pigeonpea. Intercropping of preceding pigeonpea with dhaincha for green manure, fodder cowpea and greengram (grain) gave higher yields of 4·35, 397 and 3·68 t/ha respectively than the wheat following pigeonpea alone (3·20 t/ha). Similar effects on wheat straw were also recorded. Summer-sown pigeonpea produced 2·38 t grain/ha without any adverse effect of intercrops. However, kharif pigeonpea produced grain yield half of that obtained in the summer-sown crop. Further, the reductions in grain yield of kharif pigeonpea due to dhaincha, cowpea and greengram were 0·60, 0·52 and 030 t/ha, respectively. Summer pigeonpea + dhaincha-wheat and summer pigeonpea+greengram-wheat proved their superiority over other cropping systems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

SINGH, UMMED, C. S. PRAHARAJ, S. S. SINGH, K. K. HAZRA, and N. KUMAR. "Effect of crop establishment practices on the performance of component cultivars under pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in IGP." Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88, no. 5 (May 25, 2018): 691–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80050.

Full text

Abstract:

Pigeonpea–wheat rotation is emerging as a potential alternative to existing rice–wheat system of Indo–Gangetic plains because of many inherent constraints right from requirements of higher inputs to deterioration in soil health in the latter. Realizing the importance of pigeonpea–wheat cropping system, the present study was conducted to evaluate diverse crop establishment practices [ridge pigeonpea followed by flatbed wheat (RP–FBW); raised–bed pigeonpea followed by raised–bed wheat (RBP–RBW)] in combination with three cultivars of pigeonpea (UPAS 120, ICP 67B, and Pusa 992), and two wheat cultivars (Shatabdi, Unnat Halna). Two–year study revealed that raised–bed practice of crop establishment resulted in 11.7% higher grain yield of pigeonpea as compared to ridge planting. Although the advantage of raised–bed was not apparent in wheat as 13.9% higher grain yield was recorded under flatbed over raised–bed establishment method. Based on pigeonpea equivalent yield and production economics, RP–FBW was found superior over RBP–RBW. However, the performance of component crops suggested that raised–bed for pigeonpea and flatbed for wheat could be the strategic crop establishment under pigeonpea–wheat rotation. Plant nutrient utilization as expressed by nutrient harvest index, physiological efficiency and utilization efficiency differed substantially within the cultivars of pigeonpea and wheat crop; and the preceding pigeonpea cultivars significantly influenced the nutrient acquisition in the successive wheat crop. Among the different cultivars, UPAS 120 pigeonpea followed by Unnat Halna wheat had far better response measured through the highest pigeonpea equivalent yield (2.71 t/ha), net return (` Rs. 69,331), and benefit: cost ratio (2.02). Thus, the study suggested that strategic cultivar selection and appropriate crop establishment method could be the key to maximize output from the pigeonpea–wheat system in IGP.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Musokwa, Misheck, and Paramu L. Mafongoya. "Effects of improved pigeonpea fallows on biological and physical soil properties and their relationship with maize yield." Agroforestry Systems 95, no. 2 (January 26, 2021): 443–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00598-7.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractDeclining soil properties have triggered lower maize yields among smallholder famers in South Africa. Legume trees such as pigeonpea can be used as improved fallows to replenish degraded soils. The objectives of the study were to: (1) examine the effects of improved pigeonpea fallows on enhancing biological, physical soil properties and maize yield responses and (2), analyze the relationship of maize grain yield to biological and physical soil properties after improved pigeonpea fallows at Wartburg, South Africa. Pigeonpea fallows were established in 2015/16 season and terminated in 2017 and subsequently maize was planted. A randomized complete block design replicated three times was used with five treatments: continuous sole maize without fertilizer (T1), natural fallow then maize (T2), pigeonpea + grass—pigeonpea then maize (T3), maize + pigeonpea—pigeonpea then maize (T4), two-year pigeonpea fallow then maize (T5). Improved pigeonpea fallows increased maize yields through improvement in soil macrofauna species abundance, richness and diversity, aggregate stability, infiltration rate. Pigeonpea fallows increased maize yield by 3.2 times than continuous maize without fertilizer. The maize grain yield (3787 kg ha−1), was the highest on two-year pigeonpea fallows while continuous maize without fertilizer had the least (993 kg ha−1). There was a significant positive correlation between soil macrofauna indices and physical soil properties to maize yields. Smallholders who have limited access to fertilizers can sustainably use improved fallows to restore degraded soils to achieve higher maize yields in South Africa.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Jena, D., and C. Misra. "Effect of Crop Geometry (Row Proportions) on the Water Balance of the Root Zone of a Pigeonpea and Rice Intercropping System." Experimental Agriculture 24, no. 3 (July 1988): 385–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0014479700016240.

Full text

Abstract:

SUMMARYRice, pigeonpea and rice + pigeonpea systems (in the row proportions of 1:2 and 2:5) were compared. Soil water depletion and percolation were determined during selected dry spells and yields ascertained after harvest. The mean evapotranspiration rates of rice, pigeonpea, rice + pigeonpea (1:2) and rice + pigeonpea (2:5) were 0.28, 0.79, 0.40 and 0.35 cm d−1, respectively, during a dry spell around 60 days after sowing. In general low rainfall intensity and frequent dry spells in the growing season increased pigeonpea yield but depressed that of rice. Intercropping thus ensured yield stability and hence the profitability of the system as a whole.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Byth, D. E. "The pigeonpea." Field Crops Research 35, no. 2 (November 1993): 149–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90148-g.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

SEKHON, FATEHJEET SINGH, THAKAR SINGH, and K. S. SAINI. "Productivity and nutrient uptake of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in pigeonpea based intercropping systems as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels applied to intercrops." Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88, no. 10 (February 6, 2023): 1582–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i10.84227.

Full text

Abstract:

The experiment was conducted at students’ research farm, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of planting pattern and levels of nutrient applied to intercrops on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] based intercropping systems. Pigeonpea seed yield and biological yield were not significantly influenced by different planting pattern and nutrient level applied to intercrops under different intercropping systems during both the years. Pigeonpea equivalent yield was significantly affected by planting pattern and nutrient levels. Highest pigeonpea equivalent yield (1.84 and 1.90 tonnes/ha) was observed under planting pattern of pigeonpea (50 cm × 25 cm) + maize fodder during during both the years. Pigeonpea equivalent yield increased with increase in levels of nutrient to intercrops and maximum pigeonpea equivalent yield of 1.63 and 1.73 tonnes/ha was obtained with 100% of recommended dose of nutrients applied to intercrop. N, P and K uptake by pigeonpea was not affected by different planting pattern but N (75.3 and 80.8 kg/ha), P (16.0 and 17.2 kg/ha) and K (70.0 and 78.4 kg/ha) uptake was maximum with 100% nutrients applied to intercrops during both the years, respectively. Similar trend was observed with available N, P and K in soil at harvest.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Pigeonpea"

1

Sakala, Webster Denis Moffat. "Nitrogen dynamics in Maize Pigeonpea intercropping in Malawi." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.300405.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Odeny, Damaris Achieng. "Microsatellite development and application in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)." [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2006. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=980599296.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Soko, Hastings Nthayinda. "Inheritance of time to flowering in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.]." Thesis, University of Reading, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.245053.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Omanga, Paul Abuto. "Measurement and prediction of flowering in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.)." Thesis, University of Reading, 1994. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.359210.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Nndwambi, F. H. "Evaluation of dryland maize / pigeonpea intercropping under variable phosphorus application rates." Thesis, University of Limpopo, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1233.

Full text

Abstract:

Thesis (M.Sc (Plant Production)) --University of Limpopo, 2015
Information on the performance of the maize and pigeonpea intercropping system under dryland conditions of South Africa is scanty. The aim of this study was to determine the optimum P level and productivity of pigeonpea and maize under the dryland intercropping system. Five P rates (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 kg P ha-1) were applied to both sole and pigeonpea intercropped with maize in a randomized complete block design with 4 replicates. Growth parameters and yield and yield attributes of pigeonpea and maize were measured to determine performance of both crops. There were significant differences in grain yield of pigeonpea as influenced by P rates in both seasons. Highest grain yields of 781 kg ha-1 during 2009/10 and 894 kg ha-1 during 2010/11 were obtained at P rate of 45 kg ha-1. Cropping system significantly influenced grain yield of pigeonpea in 2010/11 season with 37.1% higher pigeonpea grain yield from intercropped plots than in sole pigeonpea plots. There was 21.8% increase in grain yield of pigeonpea across two seasons as influenced by P rate. Maize grain yield showed little response to P rate only during the first season. However, highest maize grain yield of 1699 kg ha-1 was obtained at 60 kg P ha-1 during the 2009/10 season. Maize grain yield was only significantly influenced by cropping system during the 2010/11 season where sole plots achieved higher grain yield of 4148 kg ha-1 compared to 3297 kg ha-1 from intercrop plots. The results revealed that P application increased grain yield of pigeonpea significantly, especially in intercropped plots. The calculated total land equivalent ratio (LER) for the two crops gave positive and higher than one values, which suggests a favourable grain yield advantage for maize/pigeon pea intercrop.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Marshall, Fiona M. "Resource partitioning and productivity of perennial pigeonpea/groundnut agroforestry systems in India." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 1995. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12206/.

Full text

Abstract:

The productivity of two spatial arrangements of a perennial pigeonpea/groundnut agroforestry system was examined in relation to the capture and use of light and water and alterations in microclimatic conditions. Line planted (5.4 m alleys) and dispersed arrangements (1.8 x 1.2 m spacing) of pigeonpea were compared, using populations of 0.5 plants m2 for pigeonpea and 33 plants m2 (0.3 x 0.1 m spacing) for groundnut in both treatments. Sole pigeonpea and groundnut treatments were included for comparison. The experiment was conducted between July 1989 and March 1991 on a 0.6 ha plot of Alfisol at ICRISAT Center, Andhra Pradesh, India, using a randomised block design with four replications. The first groundnut harvest took place in October 1989, while pigeonpea was harvested for grain and fodder in January 1990, and was cut to a height of 0.5 m during the 1990 dry season and again in August 1990 after a second groundnut crop was sown. The second groundnut harvest took place in November 1990 and the final pigeonpea grain harvest was in January 1991. Light interception, soil and leaf temperatures and saturation deficit were continuously monitored in all treatments and at various distances from the pigeonpea in the line and dispersed treatments, whilst windspeed was monitored at a single location in each treatment. Regular destructive samples of groundnut were used to establish effects on growth and development and the results were considered in relation to the concurrent physical measurements to determine the environmental factors influencing productivity. In order to establish a water balance, rainfall records were maintained, runoff plots were installed and soil moisture content was measured regularly throughout the drying cycle. Transpiration by pigeonpea was monitored using a heat balance technique, while transpiration by groundnut and soil surface evaporation were estimated from micrometeorological data. As pigeonpea is initially slow growing, there was little reduction in groundnut yield in either the line or dispersed treatments in 1989 and there was a slight intercrop advantage in overall biomass production when expressed in the terms of the land equivalent ratios. In 1990, groundnut pod yield was reduced by 20 and 44 % in the line and dispersed treatments relative to the sole crop, despite substantial increases in the light conversion coefficient for the shaded groundnut. The lower pod yield resulted from the delayed onset of pod initiation and a slower rate of development, and was mainly due the effects of shading by the pigeonpea canopy, although mild water stress may have been a minor contributory factor. The small reductions in saturation deficit and soil and leaf temperatures experienced by the shaded groundnut had a negligible effect on growth and development. There was a considerable increase in overall biomass production in the line and dispersed treatments as compared with 1989 due to rapid pigeonpea growth, which reflected an increase in overall resource use rather than in the light conversion coefficient or water use ratios of the systems. The influence of spatial arrangement on the growth and productivity of pigeonpea became apparent after the 1990 dry season. Biomass production by pigeonpea in the dispersed treatment was approximately double that of the line planting between August 1990 and January 1991. This was entirely due to increased transpiration by the dispersed pigeonpea as a result of greater utilisation of stored soil moisture and reduced losses by surface evaporation and deep drainage. There was no difference in the water use ratio. To examine further the mechanisms responsible for the differences in productivity and water use by the line and dispersed pigeonpea, trench profile methodology was used to examine the root systems in December 1990. The root system of the dispersed pigeonpea was distributed over the entire 2.0 m depth x 2.7 m width exposed soil profile, whilst that of the line arrangement occupied no more than 50 % of the same area. The results of this work are discussed in relation to previous studies of resource use and productivity in intercropping and agroforestry systems, and possible applications and future developments are considered. Finally, the major physical and socioeconomic factors determining the potential of perennial pigeonpea/groundnut agroforestry systems for adoption by farmers in semi-arid India are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ranade, S. A. "Molecular studies in plant genomes with special reference to cowpea and pigeonpea." Thesis(Ph.D.), CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, 1986. http://dspace.ncl.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12252/3263.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Chikusie-Chirwa, Paxie Wanangwa. "Water and nitrogen dynamics in Gliricidia sepium/pigeonpea/maize systems in Southern Malawi." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.395622.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Dawit, Abigail Ngugi. "Improvement of Helicoverpa armigera resistance in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) through 'omics and breeding." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2021. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/226045/1/Abigail_Dawit_Thesis.pdf.

Full text

Abstract:

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) is a sub-tropical and tropical pulse rich in plant-based protein, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins. Helicoverpa armigera is the most devastating insect pest in pigeonpea. This study focussed on deciphering the molecular host plant resistance (HPR) mechanisms applied by Cajanus scarabaeoides a wild pigeonpea against insect using transcriptomic and proteomic studies. These HPR mechanisms were transferred to the cultivated pigeonpea via interspecific hybridisation, and they are stable at F2 generation. The study outcome provides a unique insight into the insect resistance mechanisms employed by C. scarabaeoides and lays the foundation for further studies and applications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Mawal, M. R. "Studies of seed storage proteins in legumes with a special reference to pigeonpea." Thesis(Ph.D.), CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, 1988. http://dspace.ncl.res.in:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12252/5962.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Pigeonpea"

1

Varshney, Rajeev K., Rachit K. Saxena, and Scott A. Jackson, eds. The Pigeonpea Genome. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63797-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Upadhyay, R. S. Wilt of pigeonpea. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University, 2001.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Remanandan, P. ICRISAT pigeonpea germplasm catalog: Passport information. Patancheru, A.P., India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 1988.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Remanandan, P. ICRISAT pigeonpea germplasm catalog: Passport information. Patancheru, A.P: ICRISAT, 1988.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics., ed. Vegetable pigeonpea: A promising crop for India. Patancheru: ICRISAT, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Sastry, D. V. S. S. R. and Mengesha Melak H, eds. ICRISAT pigeonpea germplasm catalog: Evaluation and analysis. Patancheru, A.P: ICRISAT, 1988.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Saxena, K. B. Pigeonpea: A resilient crop for the Philippine drylands. Patancheru: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Wallis, E. S. Potential for pigeonpea in Thailand, Indonesia, and Burma. Bogor, Indonesia: Regional Co-ordination Centre for Research and Development of Coarse Grains, Pulses, Roots and Tuber Crops in the Humid Tropics of Asia and the Pacific, 1988.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Nene, Y. L. A world list of chickpea and pigeonpea pathogens. 5th ed. Andhra Pradesh, India: ICRISAT, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 1996.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

S, Chauhan Y., ed. Effects of soil solarization on pigeonpea and chickpea. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 1988.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Pigeonpea"

1

Mallikarjuna, Nalini. "Pigeonpea." In Alien Gene Transfer in Crop Plants, Volume 2, 153–62. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9572-7_7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Zaveri, P. P., and A. R. Pathak. "Pigeonpea." In Hybrid Cultivar Development, 439–50. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07822-8_19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Sharma, D., and J. M. Green. "Pigeonpea." In Hybridization of Crop Plants, 471–81. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/1980.hybridizationofcrops.c33.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Mallikarjuna, Nalini, Sandhya Srikanth, C. V. Sameer Kumar, Rakesh K. Srivastava, Rachit K. Saxena, and Rajeev K. Varshney. "Pigeonpea." In Broadening the Genetic Base of Grain Legumes, 149–59. New Delhi: Springer India, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2023-7_7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Satheesh Naik, S. J., Abhishek Bohra, Indra Prakash Singh, and Abha Tiwari. "Pigeonpea Breeding." In Fundamentals of Field Crop Breeding, 1063–95. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9257-4_21.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Singh, Vikas K., Rachit K. Saxena, and Rajeev K. Varshney. "Sequencing Pigeonpea Genome." In The Pigeonpea Genome, 93–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63797-6_9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Varshney, Rajeev K., Rachit K. Saxena, and Scott A. Jackson. "The Pigeonpea Genome: An Overview." In The Pigeonpea Genome, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63797-6_1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Varshney, Rajeev K., Rachit K. Saxena, and Scott A. Jackson. "Future Prospects." In The Pigeonpea Genome, 99–104. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63797-6_10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Saxena, K. B., Rachit K. Saxena, and Rajeev K. Varshney. "Key Plant and Grain Characteristics and Their Importance in Breeding and Adaptation of Pigeonpea Cultivars." In The Pigeonpea Genome, 5–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63797-6_2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sameer Kumar, C. V., S. J. Satheesh Naik, Nidhi Mohan, Rachit K. Saxena, and Rajeev K. Varshney. "Botanical Description of Pigeonpea [Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.]." In The Pigeonpea Genome, 17–29. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63797-6_3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Pigeonpea"

1

Sudini, Hari. "Triple bagging for safe storage of chickpea and pigeonpea seeds at the farmers' level." In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.105522.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Yasin, Jeshima. "Photosensitive flowering trait manipulating network of genes mapped with BTB and BOZ for rewiring alternatives in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)." In ASPB PLANT BIOLOGY 2020. USA: ASPB, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46678/pb.20.1332535.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!