Relevant bibliographies by topics / Planning theory / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Planning theory.

Journal articles on the topic 'Planning theory'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 8 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Planning theory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Goldberg, Beverly, and John G. Sifonis. "Planning Theory." Journal of Business Strategy 15, no. 4 (April 1994): 23–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb039643.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Boar, Bernard. "Planning Theory." Journal of Business Strategy 16, no. 1 (January 1995): 16–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb039675.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gouillart, Francis. "Planning Theory." Journal of Business Strategy 16, no. 3 (March 1995): 14–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb039697.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Simmie, James. "Planning theory and planning practice." Cities 4, no. 4 (November 1987): 304–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(87)90092-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Barry, Janice, Megan Horst, Andy Inch, Crystal Legacy, Susmita Rishi, Juan J. Rivero, Anne Taufen, Juliana M. Zanotto, and Andrew Zitcer. "Unsettling planning theory." Planning Theory 17, no. 3 (June 29, 2018): 418–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095218763842.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent political developments in many parts of the world seem likely to exacerbate rather than ameliorate the planetary-scale challenges of social polarization, inequality and environmental change societies face. In this unconventional multi-authored essay, we therefore seek to explore some of the ways in which planning theory might respond to the deeply unsettling times we live in. Taking the multiple, suggestive possibilities of the theme of unsettlement as a starting point, we aim to create space for reflection and debate about the state of the discipline and practice of planning theory, questioning what it means to produce knowledge capable of acting on the world today. Drawing on exchanges at a workshop attended by a group of emerging scholars in Portland, Oregon in late 2016, the essay begins with an introduction section exploring the contemporary resonances of ‘unsettling’ in, of and for planning theory. This is followed by four, individually authored responses which each connect the idea of unsettlement to key challenges and possible future directions. We end by calling for a reflective practice of theorizing that accepts unsettlement but seeks to act knowingly and compassionately on the uneven terrain that it creates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Klosterman, Richard E. "Planning Theory Education." Journal of Planning Education and Research 31, no. 3 (August 24, 2011): 319–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x11413601.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Stiftel, Bruce. "Teaching Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 14, no. 3 (April 1995): 155–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9501400301.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Friedmann, John. "Teaching Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 14, no. 3 (April 1995): 156–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9501400302.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Friedmann, John. "Planning theory revisited*." European Planning Studies 6, no. 3 (June 1998): 245–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654319808720459.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Faludi, A. "From Planning Theory Mark 1 to Planning Theory Mark 3." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25, no. 7 (December 1998): 110–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/239980839802500717.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Cao, Kang, and Jean Hillier. "Planning theory in China and Chinese planning theory: Guest editorial introduction." Planning Theory 12, no. 4 (October 9, 2013): 331–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095213493983.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Eisenschitz, Aram. "Town Planning, Planning Theory and Social Reform." International Planning Studies 13, no. 2 (May 2008): 133–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563470802292000.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Archibugi, Franco. "Planning theory: reconstruction or requiem for planning?" European Planning Studies 12, no. 3 (April 2004): 425–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000194994.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Friedmann, John. "Why Do Planning Theory?" Planning Theory 2, no. 1 (March 2003): 7–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095203002001002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Harrison, Philip. "Making planning theory real." Planning Theory 13, no. 1 (May 13, 2013): 65–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095213484144.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Haddawy, Peter, and Larry Rendell. "Planning and decision theory." Knowledge Engineering Review 5, no. 1 (March 1990): 15–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026988890000521x.

Full text
Abstract:
Research on planning in AI can be separated into the two major areas: plan generation and plan representation. Most AI planners to date have been based on the STRIPS planning representation. This representation has a number of limitations. Much recent work in plan representation has addressed these limitations. It was shown that Decision Theory can be used to remove a number of the limitations. Furthermore, the decision theoretic framework provides a precise definition of rational behaviour. There remain open questions within decision theory regarding belief revision and causality. It should be noted that these problems are not artifacts of the representation. Rather they arise because the rich representation allows their formulation. Some work integrating AI and decision theoretic approaches to planning has been done but this remains a largely untouched research area.We see two main avenues for fruitful research. First, the straightforward decision theoretic formulation of planning is computationally impractical. Techniques need to be developed to do efficient decision theoretic planning. Work in AI plan generation has exploited information contained the structure of qualitative representations to guide efficient plan construction. These techniques should be applied to decision theoretic representations as well. Second, AI has developed many representations that allow useful structuring of knowledge about the world. Decision Theory has concentrated on representing beliefs and desires. Integration of AI and decision theoretic representations would yield powerful representation languages. Some of the benefits of such work can already be seen in the research combining temporal and decision theoretic representations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Cartwright, T. J. "Planning and Chaos Theory." Journal of the American Planning Association 57, no. 1 (March 31, 1991): 44–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369108975471.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Kudva, Neema. "Teaching Planning, Constructing Theory." Planning Theory & Practice 9, no. 3 (September 2008): 363–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649350802277845.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Healey, Patsy. "Readings in Planning Theory." Planning Theory & Practice 13, no. 2 (June 2012): 342–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.669994.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Mäntysalo, Raine, and Karoliina Jarenko. "Communicative Planning Theory Following Deliberative Democracy Theory." International Journal of E-Planning Research 3, no. 1 (January 2014): 38–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014010104.

Full text
Abstract:
The article reviews the development of communicative planning theory in relation to deliberative democracy theory. The latter has evolved since its “first generation” of Habermas and Rawls, to incorporate more pragmatic and contextual considerations to the theory, in response to criticisms that parallel those on communicative planning theory. The contemporary “third generation” of deliberative democracy theory has relaxed on the consensus goal, considering deliberation as legitimate even when the parties advocate their own interests in intense negotiations. The article discusses how this development has been reflected in communicative planning theory, concentrating especially on John Forester's critical pragmatism. It further examines the concept of trading zone and its linkages to this theoretical development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

March, Alan. "Practising theory: When theory affects urban planning." Planning Theory 9, no. 2 (May 2010): 108–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095209357864.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Vogelij, Jan. "Is planning theory really open for planning practice?" Planning Theory & Practice 16, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 128–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1004901.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Brock, David M. "Towards a Contingency Theory of Planning." Journal of Management & Organization 1, no. 1 (January 1995): 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200006398.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractAlthough most managers and researchers believe planning is beneficial for organizations, many research studies have failed to prove these benefits are significant. Methodological problems have certainly detracted from researchers' abilities to show a planning-performance linkage.The article deals with definitional issues about planning and five planning modes. Contingency propositions are developed to link the planning modes with several strategic and contextual situations. For example, it is argued that, while (1) prospector-type strategies are best implemented with externally oriented planning systems like longer-range planning or strategic planning, (2) defender-type strategies are better with internal orientations, like comprehensive planning or implementation-oriented planning. In addition to strategy, other contingency variables examined are user sector, purchase frequency and the stage of product life cycle in which the planning is undertaken.Planning has adherents as well as detractors among managers and academics. Both sides of the debate can be seen in Mintzberg's (1994a & 1994b) recent publications on the “rise and fall” and “fall and rise” of strategic planning. Many have pointed to planning's benefits to organisations (eg Ansoff, 1977; Bryson, 1988; Langley, 1988). Yet research studies have failed to prove that these benefits are significant (eg Fredrickson & Mitchell, 1984; Fulmer & Rue, 1974; Grinyer & Norburn, 1975; Powell, 1992; Robinson & Pearce, 1983; Pearce, Freeman, & Robinson, 1987). Pearce, et al. (1987) noted a lack of attention to contextual influences; inconsistencies in operationalisation of planning; measurement validity problems; ignoring implementation factors, time frames, and size effects as the methodological problems in this area of research that may have affected researchers' chances of finding the expected link. Rhyne (1986: 423) also argued that some ambiguous findings were attributable to “the manner in which planning was actually carried out, rather than to planning itself”.Another possible weakness in the “planning” research is that it has not discriminated between modes or approaches to planning. The assumption seems to have been that “more planning is better,” or that longer-term, strategic planning should work in all or most contexts (Bryson, 1988; Eadie, 1983; James, 1984). The present article questions this view and suggests that less sophisticated planning may be better suited to some contexts and more elaborate approaches to others. Robinson and Pearce (1983) support such an approach, suggesting that less formalised planning may be preferable in certain situations.The article builds on Hofer's (1975) “contingency theory of business strategy,” as well as on Hambrick and Lei's (1985) “prioritization of contingency variables.” From a theoretical standpoint, a contingency approach is particularly well suited to strategy-related research (Galbraith & Kazanjian, 1986; Hofer, 1975) and this approach could hold the solution to an understanding of the elusive planning-performance link. Although past planning research has failed to provide conclusive evidence that a given planning system helps performance in all situations, certain planning systems may work well in some contexts but not in others.This article begins with a brief discussion of planning and some definitions of different planning modes. A number of contingency propositions are then developed to link these planning modes with variables that are of interest to contemporary management researchers and practitioners.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Brock, David M. "Towards a Contingency Theory of Planning." Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 1, no. 1 (January 1995): 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jmo.1995.1.1.17.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractAlthough most managers and researchers believe planning is beneficial for organizations, many research studies have failed to prove these benefits are significant. Methodological problems have certainly detracted from researchers' abilities to show a planning-performance linkage.The article deals with definitional issues about planning and five planning modes. Contingency propositions are developed to link the planning modes with several strategic and contextual situations. For example, it is argued that, while (1) prospector-type strategies are best implemented with externally oriented planning systems like longer-range planning or strategic planning, (2) defender-type strategies are better with internal orientations, like comprehensive planning or implementation-oriented planning. In addition to strategy, other contingency variables examined are user sector, purchase frequency and the stage of product life cycle in which the planning is undertaken.Planning has adherents as well as detractors among managers and academics. Both sides of the debate can be seen in Mintzberg's (1994a & 1994b) recent publications on the “rise and fall” and “fall and rise” of strategic planning. Many have pointed to planning's benefits to organisations (eg Ansoff, 1977; Bryson, 1988; Langley, 1988). Yet research studies have failed to prove that these benefits are significant (eg Fredrickson & Mitchell, 1984; Fulmer & Rue, 1974; Grinyer & Norburn, 1975; Powell, 1992; Robinson & Pearce, 1983; Pearce, Freeman, & Robinson, 1987). Pearce, et al. (1987) noted a lack of attention to contextual influences; inconsistencies in operationalisation of planning; measurement validity problems; ignoring implementation factors, time frames, and size effects as the methodological problems in this area of research that may have affected researchers' chances of finding the expected link. Rhyne (1986: 423) also argued that some ambiguous findings were attributable to “the manner in which planning was actually carried out, rather than to planning itself”.Another possible weakness in the “planning” research is that it has not discriminated between modes or approaches to planning. The assumption seems to have been that “more planning is better,” or that longer-term, strategic planning should work in all or most contexts (Bryson, 1988; Eadie, 1983; James, 1984). The present article questions this view and suggests that less sophisticated planning may be better suited to some contexts and more elaborate approaches to others. Robinson and Pearce (1983) support such an approach, suggesting that less formalised planning may be preferable in certain situations.The article builds on Hofer's (1975) “contingency theory of business strategy,” as well as on Hambrick and Lei's (1985) “prioritization of contingency variables.” From a theoretical standpoint, a contingency approach is particularly well suited to strategy-related research (Galbraith & Kazanjian, 1986; Hofer, 1975) and this approach could hold the solution to an understanding of the elusive planning-performance link. Although past planning research has failed to provide conclusive evidence that a given planning system helps performance in all situations, certain planning systems may work well in some contexts but not in others.This article begins with a brief discussion of planning and some definitions of different planning modes. A number of contingency propositions are then developed to link these planning modes with variables that are of interest to contemporary management researchers and practitioners.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Alexander, Ernest R. "“Planning” or e-Planning?" International Journal of E-Planning Research 3, no. 1 (January 2014): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014010101.

Full text
Abstract:
Planning theory is hardly relevant for E-Planning, because generic “planning” does not exist for practical purposes, except as distinct planning practices. E-Planning is such a practice, with implications for E-Planning theory, education and practice. Defining planning as “what planners do” makes planning a socially recognized practice; for such practices “planning” always has a qualifyer: urban-, environmental- or strategic planning. Meaningful discussion of planning demands contingent referents not abstract generalizations. Diverse planning practices are identifyable on several dimensions: sector, level or domain, and country. With various actors and blends of usable knowledge, planning practices contribute expertise to the co-construction of knowledge. The case for E-Planning follows the prototype of spatial planning, including tools: knowledge that E-planners contribute; practice: the E-Planner's role and social purpose; and context: E-planners' workplaces and their institutional environment. Evidence of institutionalization (including the IJEPR) confirms that E-Planning is a real planning practice, with E-Planning theory in development and awaiting integration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Byrne, David. "Complexity Theory and Planning Theory: A Necessary Encounter." Planning Theory 2, no. 3 (November 2003): 171–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147309520323002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

NAGAI, Mamoru. "Planning theory for Residential traffic." INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING REVIEW 3 (1986): 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2208/journalip.3.41.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Kouroub, Saadia, and Lahcen Oubdi. "Tax Planning: Theory and Modeling." Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research 1, no. 6 (August 30, 2022): 594–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.100.

Full text
Abstract:
The majority of taxpayers, whether individuals or corporations, seek to reduce their tax burden or to benefit from a certain tax saving. In this sense, taxpayers resort to various legal or even illegal tax planning practices. In this article, we seek to deepen the understanding of the concept of tax planning and to offer, to the various readers, new theoretical and empirical indicators to understand the motivations behind fiscally aggressive behavior. Indeed, after presenting the theoretical framework of the notion of tax planning, we will discuss the main theoretical and empirical sources that have attempted to model and estimate the extent of tax planning. At the end of our review of the theoretical and empirical literature, we can argue that the deterrence theory, which has dominated the earlier literature on tax planning, is insufficient to explain fiscally aggressive behavior, and that the modeling of tax planning practices depends to a large extent on the context of the estimated study and on the interpretations of tax laws.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Mäntysalo, Raine. "Dilemmas in Critical Planning Theory." Town Planning Review 73, no. 4 (December 2002): 417–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/tpr.73.4.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Beatley, Timothy. "Environmental Ethics and Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Literature 4, no. 1 (January 1989): 1–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088541228900400101.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Fainstein, Susan S. "Planning Theory and the City." Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, no. 2 (December 2005): 121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x05279275.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Howe, Joe, and Colin Langdon. "Towards a Reflexive Planning Theory." Planning Theory 1, no. 3 (November 2002): 209–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100302.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Chettiparamb, Angelique, Judith E. Innes, ER Alexander, Charles Hoch, Kang Cao, and Richard D. Margerum. "Insurgencies: Essays in planning theory." Planning Theory 12, no. 1 (January 22, 2013): 101–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095212450495.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Thomas, Huw. "Analytical philosophy and planning theory." Planning Outlook 28, no. 2 (January 1985): 55–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00320718508711744.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Whitehead, Patrick. "Planning theory — the emperor's clothes?" Planning Outlook 33, no. 1 (January 1990): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00320719008711861.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Baum, Howell S. "Planning theory as political practice." Society 26, no. 1 (November 1988): 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02698314.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Lopez-Lorenzo, Miguel-Jose. "The Planning Theory of Law." Res Publica 18, no. 2 (October 11, 2011): 201–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9172-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Friedmann, John. "The Uses of Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 28, no. 2 (December 2008): 247–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x08325220.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Gough, Meghan Z. "Review: Readings in Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 39, no. 1 (December 3, 2017): 121–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17743316.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Verma, Niraj. "Pragmatic Rationality and Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 16, no. 1 (September 1996): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9601600102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Harrill, Rich. "Political Ecology and Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, no. 1 (September 1999): 67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9901900106.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Campbell, Heather, and Robert Marshall. "Ethical Frameworks and Planning Theory." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23, no. 3 (September 1999): 464–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00208.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Kihl, Mary. "Integrating Planning Theory and Practice." Policy Studies Journal 23, no. 3 (September 1995): 551–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb00531.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

SORENSEN, TONY, and MARTIN AUSTER. "THEORY AND PRACTICE IN PLANNING." Australian Planner 36, no. 3 (January 1999): 146–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07293682.1999.9665748.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Healey, Patsy. "Planning Theory - By Philip Allmendinger." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35, no. 5 (August 23, 2011): 1088–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01080_3.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Harwood, Stacy Anne. "Insurgencies: Essay in Planning Theory." Planning Theory & Practice 13, no. 4 (December 2012): 641–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.731780.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Fainstein, S. S. "New Directions in Planning Theory." Urban Affairs Review 35, no. 4 (March 1, 2000): 451–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10780870022184480.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Fainstein, Susan S. "New Directions in Planning Theory." Urban Affairs Review 35, no. 4 (March 2000): 451–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500401.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Łoś, J. "Mathematical theory of production planning." European Journal of Operational Research 22, no. 3 (December 1985): 416–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(85)90267-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Healey, Patsy. "Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory." Town Planning Review 63, no. 2 (April 1992): 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Planning theory' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography