Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Plant-Pathogen Interactions / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Plant-Pathogen Interactions.

Journal articles on the topic 'Plant-Pathogen Interactions'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 26 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Plant-Pathogen Interactions.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

M, Meena. "Tomato: A Model Plant to Study Plant-Pathogen Interactions." Food Science & Nutrition Technology 4, no. 1 (2019): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/fsnt-16000171.

Full text

Abstract:

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a very important vegetable plant in the worldwide because of its importance as food, quality of fruit, improves productivity, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Tomato has been extensively used not just for food however conjointly as a research (plant-pathogen interactions) material. Generally, most of the tomato traits are agronomically imperative and cannot be studied using other model plant systems. It belongs to family Solanaceae and intimately associated with several commercially important plants like potato, tobacco, peppers, eggplant, and pet

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Caten, C. E. "Plant pathogen interactions." Genome 31, no. 2 (1989): 1114–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g89-202.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lawton, Kay, Scott Uknes, Eric Ward, and John Ryals. "Plant-pathogen interactions." Current Biology 2, no. 6 (1992): 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-9822(92)90901-l.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Lawton, Kay, Scott Uknes, Eric Ward, and John Ryals. "Plant-pathogen interactions." Current Opinion in Biotechnology 3, no. 2 (1992): 171–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-1669(92)90148-c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

M, Pal. "Role of polyamine metabolism in plant pathogen interactions." Journal of Plant Science and Phytopathology 1, no. 2 (2017): 095–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

PRIHATNA, CAHYA. "The Plant – Pathogen Interactions." Microbiology Indonesia 3, no. 3 (2009): 99–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5454/mi.3.3.1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Vinale, Francesco, Krishnapillai Sivasithamparam, Emilio L. Ghisalberti, Roberta Marra, Sheridan L. Woo, and Matteo Lorito. "Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions." Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40, no. 1 (2008): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Jameson, Paula. "Complexity underpins plant-pathogen interactions." Journal of Biogeography 30, no. 1 (2003): 156–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.08032.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Ji, Cheng, Smith-Becker Jennifer, and Keen Noel T. "Genetics of plant—pathogen interactions." Current Opinion in Biotechnology 9, no. 2 (1998): 202–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0958-1669(98)80116-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Conrath, Uwe, Corné M. J. Pieterse, and Brigitte Mauch-Mani. "Priming in plant–pathogen interactions." Trends in Plant Science 7, no. 5 (2002): 210–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02244-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Cheval, Cecilia, and Christine Faulkner. "Plasmodesmal regulation during plant-pathogen interactions." New Phytologist 217, no. 1 (2017): 62–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14857.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Tzfira, Tzvi, and Vitaly Citovsky. "Systems biology of plant–pathogen interactions." Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20, no. 9 (2009): 1015–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.05.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Citovsky, Vitaly, Adi Zaltsman, Stanislav V. Kozlovsky, Yedidya Gafni, and Alexander Krichevsky. "Proteasomal degradation in plant–pathogen interactions." Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20, no. 9 (2009): 1048–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.05.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Stokes, Trevor. "Transcriptional responses to plant pathogen interactions." Trends in Plant Science 6, no. 2 (2001): 50–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01841-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Barash, I. "Iron, siderophores and plant-pathogen interactions." Phytoparasitica 18, no. 3 (1990): 183–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02980988.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Talbot, Nicholas J. "Functional genomics of plant-pathogen interactions." New Phytologist 159, no. 1 (2003): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00809.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Zäuner, Simone, Sandra Albrecht, Philipp Ternes, et al. "Fungal glycosphingolipids in plant/pathogen interactions." Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 149 (September 2007): S73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2007.06.167.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Sedlářová, M., A. Lebeda, P. Binarová, and L. Luhová. "Role of plant cell in host-pathogen interactions: Lactuca spp.-Bremia lactucae." Plant Protection Science 38, SI 2 - 6th Conf EFPP 2002 (2017): 507–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/10539-pps.

Full text

Abstract:

Reactions of Lactuca spp. genotypes with different mechanisms of compatibility/incompatibility to B. lactucae race NL16 were examined. Microscopical study revealed significance of initial stages of infection for establishment of the host-pathogen relation. Incompatibility to the pathogen race is mostly expressed as hypersensitive reaction (HR). Rearrangement of cytoskeleton can participate in blocking of fungus penetration in resistant genotypes as well as support development of fungal infection structures in susceptible ones. During infection process peroxidase is activated, H<sub>2<

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Balotf, Sadegh, Richard Wilson, Robert S. Tegg, David S. Nichols, and Calum R. Wilson. "Shotgun Proteomics as a Powerful Tool for the Study of the Proteomes of Plants, Their Pathogens, and Plant–Pathogen Interactions." Proteomes 10, no. 1 (2022): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes10010005.

Full text

Abstract:

The interaction between plants and pathogenic microorganisms is a multifaceted process mediated by both plant- and pathogen-derived molecules, including proteins, metabolites, and lipids. Large-scale proteome analysis can quantify the dynamics of proteins, biological pathways, and posttranslational modifications (PTMs) involved in the plant–pathogen interaction. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has become the preferred method for characterizing proteins at the proteome and sub-proteome (e.g., the phosphoproteome) levels. MS-based proteomics can reveal changes in the quantitative state o

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Arie, Tsutomu, Hideki Takahashi, Motoichiro Kodama, and Tohru Teraoka. "Tomato as a model plant for plant-pathogen interactions." Plant Biotechnology 24, no. 1 (2007): 135–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.24.135.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Benjamin, Goodluck, Gaurav Pandharikar, and Pierre Frendo. "Salicylic Acid in Plant Symbioses: Beyond Plant Pathogen Interactions." Biology 11, no. 6 (2022): 861. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11060861.

Full text

Abstract:

Plants form beneficial symbioses with a wide variety of microorganisms. Among these, endophytes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia are some of the most studied and well understood symbiotic interactions. These symbiotic microorganisms promote plant nutrition and growth. In exchange, they receive the carbon and metabolites necessary for their development and multiplication. In addition to their role in plant growth and development, these microorganisms enhance host plant tolerance to a wide range of environmental stress. Multiple studies have shown that these micr

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Orłowska, Elżbieta, Briardo Llorente, and Cristina Cvitanich. "Plant integrity: An important factor in plant-pathogen interactions." Plant Signaling & Behavior 8, no. 1 (2013): e22513. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.22513.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Staskawicz, Brian J. "Genetics of Plant-Pathogen Interactions Specifying Plant Disease Resistance." Plant Physiology 125, no. 1 (2001): 73–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.1.73.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Bülow, Lorenz, Martin Schindler, Claudia Choi, and Reinhard Hehl. "PathoPlant®: A Database on Plant-Pathogen Interactions." In Silico Biology: Journal of Biological Systems Modeling and Multi-Scale Simulation 4, no. 4 (2004): 529–36. https://doi.org/10.3233/isb-00154.

Full text

Abstract:

Pathogen recognition and signal transduction during plant pathogenesis is essential for the activation of plant defense mechanisms. To facilitate easy access to published data and to permit comparative studies of different pathogen response pathways, a database is indispensable to give a broad overview of the components and reactions so far known. PathoPlant® has been developed as a relational database to display relevant components and reactions involved in signal transduction related to plant-pathogen interactions. On the organism level, the tables 'plant', 'pathogen' and 'interaction' are u

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Dodds, Peter, and Peter Thrall. "Recognition events and host–pathogen co-evolution in gene-for-gene resistance to flax rust." Functional Plant Biology 36, no. 5 (2009): 395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/fp08320.

Full text

Abstract:

The outcome of infection of individual plants by pathogenic organisms is governed by complex interactions between the host and pathogen. These interactions are the result of long-term co-evolutionary processes involving selection and counterselection between plants and their pathogens. These processes are ongoing, and occur at many spatio-temporal scales, including genes and gene products, cellular interactions within host individuals, and the dynamics of host and pathogen populations. However, there are few systems in which host–pathogen interactions have been studied across these broad scale

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Bleau, Jade R., and Steven H. Spoel. "Selective redox signaling shapes plant–pathogen interactions." Plant Physiology 186, no. 1 (2021): 53–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaa088.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Lacaze, Aline, and David L. Joly. "Structural specificity in plant–filamentous pathogen interactions." Molecular Plant Pathology 21, no. 11 (2020): 1513–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12983.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Greenberg, Jean T. "PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH IN PLANT-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS." Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, no. 1 (1997): 525–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.525.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Quirino, B. F., E. S. Candido, P. F. Campos, O. L. Franco, and R. H. Krüger. "Proteomic approaches to study plant–pathogen interactions." Phytochemistry 71, no. 4 (2010): 351–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.11.005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Romero-Puertas, María, and Massimo Delledonne. "Nitric Oxide Signaling in Plant-Pathogen Interactions." IUBMB Life 55, no. 10 (2004): 579–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15216540310001639274.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Cory, Jenny S., and Kelli Hoover. "Plant-mediated effects in insect–pathogen interactions." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, no. 5 (2006): 278–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Park, Jeong Mee, and Kyung Hee Paek. "Recognition and response in plant-pathogen interactions." Journal of Plant Biology 50, no. 2 (2007): 132–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03030621.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Perincherry, Lakshmipriya, Justyna Lalak-Kańczugowska, and Łukasz Stępień. "Fusarium-Produced Mycotoxins in Plant-Pathogen Interactions." Toxins 11, no. 11 (2019): 664. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11110664.

Full text

Abstract:

Pathogens belonging to the Fusarium genus are causal agents of the most significant crop diseases worldwide. Virtually all Fusarium species synthesize toxic secondary metabolites, known as mycotoxins; however, the roles of mycotoxins are not yet fully understood. To understand how a fungal partner alters its lifestyle to assimilate with the plant host remains a challenge. The review presented the mechanisms of mycotoxin biosynthesis in the Fusarium genus under various environmental conditions, such as pH, temperature, moisture content, and nitrogen source. It also concentrated on plant metabol

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Timilsina, Sujan, Neha Potnis, Eric A. Newberry, et al. "Xanthomonas diversity, virulence and plant–pathogen interactions." Nature Reviews Microbiology 18, no. 8 (2020): 415–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0361-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

OUCHI, Seiji. "Molecular Biological Aspects of Plant-pathogen Interactions." Japanese Journal of Phytopathology 62, no. 3 (1996): 207–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.62.207.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Rolfe, Stephen Alexander, and Julie Diane Scholes. "Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of plant–pathogen interactions." Protoplasma 247, no. 3-4 (2010): 163–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-010-0203-z.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Nehra, Chitra, Ayushi Malik, Deepika Chaudhary, and Avinash Marwal. "Plant-Multi-Pathogen Interactions: A Growing Trend." Research Journal of Biotechnology 20, no. 7 (2025): 237–45. https://doi.org/10.25303/207rjbt2370245.

Full text

Abstract:

Pathogen- host interactions involve competition, synergistic or cooperation and coexistence interactions. Host plant can also regulate niche battle among pathogens by defense response which target one or more pathogens either actively or passively. However, in general, virulent pathogens overcome the host defense strategies to infect it. Plant-pathogen interactions are mainly focused on single host-single disease model of infection. However, microbes occur in complex communities in nature and plant infections generally include more than one genotypes and show complexities which cannot be expla

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

van Dijk, Laura J. A., Johan Ehrlén, and Ayco J. M. Tack. "The timing and asymmetry of plant–pathogen–insect interactions." Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287, no. 1935 (2020): 20201303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1303.

Full text

Abstract:

Insects and pathogens frequently exploit the same host plant and can potentially impact each other's performance. However, studies on plant–pathogen–insect interactions have mainly focused on a fixed temporal setting or on a single interaction partner. In this study, we assessed the impact of time of attacker arrival on the outcome and symmetry of interactions between aphids ( Tuberculatus annulatus ), powdery mildew ( Erysiphe alphitoides ), and caterpillars ( Phalera bucephala ) feeding on pedunculate oak, Quercus robur , and explored how single versus multiple attackers affect oak performan

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Garrido, Carlos, Hernando José Bolívar-Anillo, and Victoria E. González-Rodríguez. "Advances in Plant–Fungal Pathogen Interaction." Plants 14, no. 11 (2025): 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111632.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Berger, S., A. K. Sinha, and T. Roitsch. "Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant pathogen interactions." Journal of Experimental Botany 58, no. 15-16 (2007): 4019–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm298.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Dodds, Peter N., and John P. Rathjen. "Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions." Nature Reviews Genetics 11, no. 8 (2010): 539–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2812.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Zhang, Shiyi, Cong Li, Jinping Si, Zhigang Han, and Donghong Chen. "Action Mechanisms of Effectors in Plant-Pathogen Interaction." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 12 (2022): 6758. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126758.

Full text

Abstract:

Plant pathogens are one of the main factors hindering the breeding of cash crops. Pathogens, including oomycetes, fungus, and bacteria, secrete effectors as invasion weapons to successfully invade and propagate in host plants. Here, we review recent advances made in the field of plant-pathogen interaction models and the action mechanisms of phytopathogenic effectors. The review illustrates how effectors from different species use similar and distinct strategies to infect host plants. We classify the main action mechanisms of effectors in plant-pathogen interactions according to the infestation

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Chen, Sisi, Yanfeng Zhang, Yiyang Zhao, et al. "Key Genes and Genetic Interactions of Plant-Pathogen Functional Modules in Poplar Infected by Marssonina brunnea." Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® 33, no. 8 (2020): 1080–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-11-19-0325-r.

Full text

Abstract:

Marssonina brunnea, the causative pathogen of Marssonina leaf spot of poplars (MLSP), devastates poplar plantations by forming black spots on leaves and defoliating trees. Although MLSP has been studied for over 30 years, the key genes that function during M. brunnea infection and their effects on plant growth are poorly understood. Here, we used multigene association studies to investigate the effects of key genes in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway, as revealed by transcriptome analysis, on photosynthesis and growth in a natural population of 435 Populus tomentosa individuals. By analy

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Chen, Fangfang, Ruijing Ma, and Xiao-Lin Chen. "Advances of Metabolomics in Fungal Pathogen–Plant Interactions." Metabolites 9, no. 8 (2019): 169. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo9080169.

Full text

Abstract:

Plant disease caused by fungus is one of the major threats to global food security, and understanding fungus–plant interactions is important for plant disease control. Research devoted to revealing the mechanisms of fungal pathogen–plant interactions has been conducted using genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Metabolomics research based on mass spectrometric techniques is an important part of systems biology. In the past decade, the emerging field of metabolomics in plant pathogenic fungi has received wide attention. It not only provides a qualitative and quantitative app

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Potnis, N., A. H. C. van Bruggen, J. B. Jones, K. Cowles, and J. D. Barak. "PLANT-PATHOGEN-SYMBIONT INTERACTIONS IN THE TOMATO PHYLLOSPHERE." Acta Horticulturae, no. 1069 (February 2015): 23–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2015.1069.1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kunkel, Barbara N., and Joshua M. B. Johnson. "Auxin Plays Multiple Roles during Plant–Pathogen Interactions." Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 13, no. 9 (2021): a040022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a040022.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

CHENG, Xi, Cai-Juan TIAN, Ai-Ning LI, and Jin-Long QIU. "Advances on molecular mechanisms of plant-pathogen interactions." Hereditas (Beijing) 34, no. 2 (2012): 134–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1005.2012.00134.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Real, Leslie A., and Paul McElhany. "Spatial Pattern and Process in Plant--Pathogen Interactions." Ecology 77, no. 4 (1996): 1011–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265572.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Lozano-Durán, Rosa, and Silke Robatzek. "14-3-3 Proteins in Plant-Pathogen Interactions." Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® 28, no. 5 (2015): 511–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-10-14-0322-cr.

Full text

Abstract:

14-3-3 proteins define a eukaryotic-specific protein family with a general role in signal transduction. Primarily, 14-3-3 proteins act as phosphosensors, binding phosphorylated client proteins and modulating their functions. Since phosphorylation regulates a plethora of different physiological responses in plants, 14-3-3 proteins play roles in multiple signaling pathways, including those controlling metabolism, hormone signaling, cell division, and responses to abiotic and biotic stimuli. Increasing evidence supports a prominent role of 14-3-3 proteins in regulating plant immunity against path

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Mehta, Angela, Ana C. M. Brasileiro, Djair S. L. Souza, et al. "Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us?" FEBS Journal 275, no. 15 (2008): 3731–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06528.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!