Relevant bibliographies by topics / Polarity (Philosphy)

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Polarity (Philosphy)'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 23 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Polarity (Philosphy).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Polarity (Philosphy)"

1

Zengotita, Alonso. "DIAGRAMÁTICA VITAL: POLARIDAD DE LA VIDA EN NIETZSCHE Y FREUD." Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 63, no. 151 (2022): 237–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-512x2021n15111az.

Full text
Abstract:
RESUMEN En el presente trabajo se buscará dar cuenta diagramáticamente del alcance y extensión del concepto de vida en Freud y Nietzsche, al pensar sus límites en términos de polos -instancias no alcanzables vitalmente, que marcan la frontera a partir de la cual se extiende el ‘más allá’ de la vida. Dicho de otro modo: haciendo uso de un diagrama, se buscará dar cuenta del carácter de lo vital para Nietzsche - al pensar a la vida como Wille zur Macht - y Freud - desde su último modelo pulsional - no solo en cuanto a su particularidad, sino en función de lo que resulta en cada caso el límite mismo de la vida - es decir, aquello que marca el pasaje a otra cosa que la vida.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stankovic, Dejan. "Law and morality in contemporary philosophy of law." Filozofija i drustvo, no. 19-20 (2002): 203–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid0209203s.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper, author tries to analyze complex character of the relation between law and morality in contemporary law philosophy. There are three approaches to the issue of relation between law and morality: natural law theory (identity thesis), positivist (separation thesis) and Anglo-American analytical jurisprudence (polarity thesis). The identity thesis-law and morality are basically identical, although basic principles of morality are subordinated to the positive legal rules; the separation thesis-law and morality are quite different system of norms: positive legal rules are completely deprived of any moral content; Polarity thesis - law and morality are different systems of norms which complement to each other. The polarity thesis is exemplified in theories of Herbert Hart and Ronald Dworkin's. At the logical level, polarity thesis overcomes and specifically synthesizes abstract character and reductionism of identity and separation thesis. At the socio-historical level, the polarity thesis is result of historical development of legal and political institutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Maurin, Krzysztof. "Duality (polarity) in mathematics, physics and philosophy." Reports on Mathematical Physics 25, no. 3 (1988): 357–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(88)90037-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

THOMPSON, JOHN W. "Polarity and the Measurement of Values." Theoria 30, no. 1 (2008): 21–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1964.tb01080.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Horn, Laurence R., and Young-Suk Lee. "Progovac on polarity." Journal of Linguistics 31, no. 2 (1995): 401–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700015668.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bancalari, Stefano. "“The Great Burden” of Religion." Philosophy Today 64, no. 1 (2020): 173–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202049326.

Full text
Abstract:
This article aims to reread Jonas’s famous lecture on “Heidegger and Theology” linking it with a still unpublished lecture course on Being and Time Jonas held in 1967 at the New School for Social Research. From the reading of Heidegger’s masterwork, Jonas takes the idea of the “burdensome” character of the existence, which he interprets in terms of a “polarity” between man and his “other” (other men, God, world). Such a polarity is for Jonas the very essence of “religion” (as religamen) and of responsibility. From this vantage point, “Heidegger and Theology,” with its sharp criticism of the theological appropriation of Heidegger’s post-turn philosophy, appears to be a strong defense of the burden of “polarity,” as developed in Being and Time, against its removal by the thought of Being: a Being which is nothing but a mirror image of Dasein. Partially reconsidering his views on Heidegger’s Gnosticism, Jonas turns (the earlier) Heidegger against (the later) Heidegger himself.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lavalle-Martínez, José-de-Jesús, Manuel Montes-y-Gómez, Luis Villaseñor-Pineda, Héctor Jiménez-Salazar, and Ismael-Everardo Bárcenas-Patiño. "Equivalences Among Polarity Algorithms." Studia Logica 106, no. 2 (2017): 371–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9743-y.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Progovac, Ljiljana. "Negative polarity: Entailment and binding." Linguistics and Philosophy 16, no. 2 (1993): 149–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00985178.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Israel, M. "Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics." Linguistics and Philosophy 19, no. 6 (1996): 619–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00632710.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rottet, Kevin J., and Rex A. Sprouse. "Tag questions in Welsh." Diachronica 25, no. 1 (2008): 20–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dia.25.1.03rot.

Full text
Abstract:
Modern Colloquial Welsh (MCW) displays a considerable variety of tag question patterns. In this paper we offer a unified account for the divergent developments in modern Welsh dialects, focusing on tags attached to “normal” or VSO clauses. We propose a scenario of how the MCW system of tags is descended from the pre-modern system by processes of reanalysis and grammaticalization. We show that South Walian dialects have elaborated a system of tag questions in which the tag reverses the polarity of the anchor to which it is attached, while North Walian dialects have followed a principle of constant polarity in which tags anticipate the polarity of the expected response.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Polarity (Philosphy)"

1

Gajewski, Jon Robert. "Neg-raising : polarity and presupposition." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33696.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2005.<br>Includes bibliographical references (p. 177-184).<br>In this thesis, I advance a semantic theory of Neg-Raising rooted in the work of Bartsch (1973) and Heim (2000) and defend it against syntactic and pragmatic alternatives. The primary source of support for my position on Neg-Raising comes from the natural way in which the approach explains a variety of facts about NPI-licensing in environments containing Neg-Raising predicates. In Chapter 2, a principled account is offered of a previously ill-understood contrast in NPI-licensing under stacked Neg-Raising predicates, first pointed out in Horn (1972). Also addressed are facts advanced in favor of the syntactic theory of Neg-Raising by Kiparsky and Kiparsky (1970) and Prince (1976). Horn's (1989) attractive account of Neg-Raising is reviewed in detail in Chapter 3 and found to have deficiencies, particularly in the domain of NPI-licensing. The most compelling aspect of Horn's analysis is his derivation of Neg-Raising from general principles. The purposes of Chapters 4 and 5 is to develop an alternative analysis of Neg-Raising that attains a comparable depth of explanation. First, I compare the behavior of negated Neg-Raising predicates to that of negated definite plurals.<br>(cont.) Next, I show that there is a significant correlation across constructions between obeying the Excluded Middle and having the properties of definite plurals. Finally, I offer a tentative explanation of why definite plurals obey the Excluded Middle.<br>by Jon Robert Gajewski.<br>Ph.D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Schaller, George Thomas. "De quatuor oppositis." Charlottesville, Va. : InteLex Corp, 1993. http://pastmasters2000.nlx.com/.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Polarity (Philosphy)"

1

Shirley, Sugerman, ed. Evolution of consciousness: Studies in polarity. 2nd ed. Barfield Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Icare: Une dialectique de situation. Peter Lang, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Paul, Ernst. Complexio oppositorum: Ein philosophiegeschichtlicher Überblick. Württembergische Landesbibliothek, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Köhne, Otto. Die Urheber der abendländischen Polaritätslehre: Lehren und Bedeutung für die Gegenwart. Verlag Sokrates, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gegensätze, Gegenspiele. K. Alber, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Guglielminetti, Enrico. " Due" di filosofia. Jaca book, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ishrāqī, Muḥammad. Muqaddamahʹī bar mudīriyat-i taz̤ādd dar muḥīṭʹhā-yi kār va zindagī: Introduction to management of contradiction in work and life places. Muḥammad Ishrāqī, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Returning to Zhu Xi: Emerging patterns within the supreme polarity. State University of New York Press, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Uvarov, M. S. Binarnyĭ arkhetip: Ėvoli͡u︡t͡s︡ii͡a︡ idei antinomizma v istorii evropeĭskoĭ filosofii i kulʹtury. Baltiĭskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ tekhnicheskiĭ institut, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Books, Time-Life, ed. Cosmic Duality (Mysteries of the Unknown). Time-Life Books, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Polarity (Philosphy)"

1

Hon, Tze-ki. "Zhou Dunyi’s Philosophy of the Supreme Polarity." In Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2930-0_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gajewski, Jon. "On Ladusaw’s “On the Notion Affective in the Analysis of Negative-Polarity Items”." In Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85308-2_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Atlas, Jay David. "‘Few’, ‘A Few’, ‘Only’: Negative Quantifier Noun Phases and Negative Polarity Items – The Horn-Atlas Debate 1991–2018." In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56437-7_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cheyne, Peter. "Developing Polarity: Trichotomy, Tetractys, and Pentad." In Coleridge's Contemplative Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851806.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 9 addresses noetic contemplation through Coleridge’s higher logic, or rather ‘Noetic’, of the ‘tetrad’, relating absolutes (the Trinity, reality, being, the good, etc.), and his pentad, relating non-absolutes (human institutions, natural powers, and phenomena). Section 9.1 argues that these forms ‘tautegorically’ represent Coleridge’s metaphysics and compares these forms to C. S. Peirce’s ‘abductive’ logic. Section 9.2 discusses Coleridge’s historical sources, mainly Schelling and other Naturphilosophen. Section 9.3 argues that Coleridge crucially differs from Schelling here with a divergent conception of the indifference-point, or Coleridgean mesothesis, and its relation to the Absolute. Section 9.4 illuminates Coleridge’s neglected distinction between his tetracti, which are always and entirely noetic, constellating absolutes (ideas or powers), and his pentads, which are either noetic, containing an absolute term, or logical, constellating only non-absolutes. Section 9.5 pauses for transitional remarks before the pentads are interpreted in Chapter 10 with respect to the humane value of contemplation and the realization of ideas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Stone, Alison. "Nature, Freedom, and Gender in Schelling." In Schelling's Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812814.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines Schelling’s ideas about nature and freedom from a feminist perspective, looking at his First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature and his later Philosophical Investigations on the Essence of Human Freedom. In both works, Schelling argues that two opposed but interdependent metaphysical powers are necessary to the constitution of the world, and he interprets these powers in terms of a gendered polarity. The chapter draws out the ambiguous implications of Schelling’s views as regards the relative value of each gender, and considers how this bears on contemporary possibilities for reappropriating Schelling’s thought, with critical reference to Žižek.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Smith, Kenneth M. "Desire, Creativity and Gender Polarity in the Compositional Explosion of 1903." In Skryabin, Philosophy and the Music of Desire. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315609287-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hügli, Anton. "Das Nahe und das Ferne, das Einzelne und das Allgemeine, das Zeitliche und das Ewige. Über die Grundpolarität in Jaspers Denken." In Karl Jaspers. Filozofia wieczysta - filozofia czasu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego w Krakowie, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24917/9788380846616.1.

Full text
Abstract:
Karl Jaspers received the basic figure of his thinking from Kierkegaard: that of the self-caring subjective thinker who, by relating himself to himself, re- lates to another. The two moments that make up this basic figure – my rela- tionship with myself and the other on which this relationship is based – run through Jaspers’ entire thinking: be it as the individual versus the general, as the present versus the Eternal, as the near One versus the distant One, as existence versus transcendence. It is man’s job to endure the tension between these two poles and to in- tegrate them into his life. This task can only be solved existentially, but it is understood correctly only through philosophical thinking. Because the two poles are beyond all knowledge and can only be illuminated by philosophical thought, but never caught up conceptually, each individual is called upon to choose freely what he believes in and “which star he wants to bind himself to”. It is this incessant process of making oneself sure of oneself and of the encompassing being that, according to Jaspers, defines philosophy as philoso- phia perennis and yet always ties it back to the historical situation in which the individual thinker finds himself and tries to find out what is true to him in the eternal sense. These two sides in Jaspers’ philosophy – his understanding of philosophy as philosophia perennis and his insistence on the respective his- torical situation – are therefore only two aspects of the basic polarity of his thinking.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kaboré, Boniface. "L’universel démocratique et ses adaptations socio-culturelles." In The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Philosophy Documentation Center, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/wcp20-paideia199841748.

Full text
Abstract:
Partant du principe que l’idéal démocratique est une norme universelle, la discussion au coeur de ce travail soulève une série de questions causuistiques liées à la mise en oeuvre concrète des démocratiques dans toute société humain, quels que soient ses particularismes socio-historiques et culturels. Cette démarche découle entièrement de l’hypothèse suivant laquelle le problème fondamental de la démocratisation, autrement dit de la domiciliation de l’idéal démocratique, se ramène à celui de son ap-propriation, d l’adaption du principle universal aux structures de base d’une société donnée, produit de conditions socio-culturelles, religieuses, politiques et économiques. Dans le but de dévoiler l’enjeu primordial qui polarise les différents aspects de la question, nous tentons, en premier temps, de mettre en évidence la ‘particularité culturelle’ du modèle de la démocratie libérale. Cette tenative débouche, en fin de compte, sur une remise en question de la prétention universaliste de la démocratie occidentale. Nous discutons ensuite des difficult ensuite des difficultés practiques qu’entraînent l’exigence traditionnelle du multipartisme et la définition des droits et libertés de base dans tout processus de démocratisation. Notre objectif, en abordant ces différentes questions, est de faire ressortir, avant tout, le caractére inextricable, voire insoluble, des problèmes practiques que soulève l’appropriation socio-culturelle de l’idéal démocratique, lesquels problèmes imposent de recourir à une méthode d’analyse cauistique des processus de démocratisation et de ne plus se satisfaire de l’universalisme abstrait et dogmatique.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography