Relevant bibliographies by topics / Political polarization

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Political polarization'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 29 March 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Political polarization.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Political polarization"

1

Dixit, Avinash K., and Jörgen W. Weibull. "Political polarization." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, no. 18 (April 23, 2007): 7351–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702071104.

Full text
Abstract:
Failures of government policies often provoke opposite reactions from citizens; some call for a reversal of the policy, whereas others favor its continuation in stronger form. We offer an explanation of such polarization, based on a natural bimodality of preferences in political and economic contexts and consistent with Bayesian rationality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sunder, Anand. "Deciphering Polarization from Opposing Political Narratives." International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 13, no. 9 (September 5, 2024): 790–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/sr24914201642.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kriswantoro, Thomas, Endah Ayuning, Ardhana Reswara, and Ahmad Zidan. "Political Polarization dan Political Disinformation." Jurnal PolGov 4, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 50–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/polgov.v4i2.3554.

Full text
Abstract:
Artikel ini membahas tentang polarisasi politik dan disinformasi politik dalam rangkaian agenda pelemahan KPK yang berdampak pada perilaku politik masyarakat di Twitter. Artikel ini menggunakan konsep political polarization, political disinformation, dan political behavior. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode big data analysis untuk pengambilan data dan analisis data. Selanjutnya, metode tersebut digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi dan memetakan polarisasi isu, isi wacana, dan aktor sebagai opinion leader. Artikel ini juga melakukan pemetaan dan analisis kritis tentang narasi yang diproduksi di media sosial, khususnya Twitter. Wacana dan aktor dalam rangkaian agenda pelemahan KPK disoroti melalui tiga peristiwa, yaitu peristiwa Revisi Undang-Undang KPK, terpilihnya Ketua KPK Firli Bahuri, dan Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan. Temuan yang disampaikan di tulisan ini, yaitu polarisasi politik di antara kelompok pro pemerintah dan oposisi pemerintah dan disinformasi politik yang diproduksi dengan membawa isu taliban dan isu radikalisme. Pada akhirnya, perilaku politik masyarakat dalam agenda pelemahan KPK cenderung melekatkan diri pada influencer yang memiliki orientasi politik yang serupa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kwon, Hyunku, and John Martin. "Subjective Political Polarization." Sociological Science 10 (2023): 903–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v10.a32.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Goncalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. "Political Polarization on Twitter." Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 5, no. 1 (August 3, 2021): 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14126.

Full text
Abstract:
In this study we investigate how social media shape the networked public sphere and facilitate communication between communities with different political orientations. We examine two networks of political communication on Twitter, comprised of more than 250,000 tweets from the six weeks leading up to the 2010 U.S. congressional midterm elections. Using a combination of network clustering algorithms and manually-annotated data we demonstrate that the network of political retweets exhibits a highly segregated partisan structure, with extremely limited connectivity between left- and right-leaning users. Surprisingly this is not the case for the user-to-user mention network, which is dominated by a single politically heterogeneous cluster of users in which ideologically-opposed individuals interact at a much higher rate compared to the network of retweets. To explain the distinct topologies of the retweet and mention networks we conjecture that politically motivated individuals provoke interaction by injecting partisan content into information streams whose primary audience consists of ideologically-opposed users. We conclude with statistical evidence in support of this hypothesis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

엄기홍. "Partisan Polarization, Electorate Polarization, and Political Participation." Korea and World Politics 23, no. 1 (March 2007): 121–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17331/kwp.2007.23.1.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, and Evren Balta. "When elites polarize over polarization: Framing the polarization debate in Turkey." New Perspectives on Turkey 60 (November 21, 2018): 153–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/npt.2018.15.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article aims to explore the views of the Turkish elite on the state of polarization in Turkey. By identifying four political frames—namely, harmony, continuity/decline, conspiracy, and conflict—that selected Turkish political and civil society elites use in discussing the phenomenon of polarization in the country through their contributions to a workshop and in-depth qualitative interviews, the article finds that there is a considerable degree of polarization among the Turkish elite regarding their views on the presence of polarization in Turkey. Moreover, this overlaps with the divide between the government and the opposition in the country. An analysis of the justificatory arguments employed in constituting the aforementioned frames shows that, while those elites who deny the existence of polarization seek its absence in essentialist characteristics of society, in reductionist comparisons with history, or in internal/external enemies, those who acknowledge polarization’s presence look for its roots in political and institutional factors and processes. The article highlights how, given the denial of polarization by the pro-government elite and the substantial gap between the two camps’ justificatory narratives, the currently reported high rates of polarization in Turkey can, at best, be expected to remain as is in the near future, barring a radical change in political constellations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, and Evren Balta. "When elites polarize over polarization: Framing the polarization debate in Turkey – RETRACTED." New Perspectives on Turkey 59 (November 2018): 109–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/npt.2018.22.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article aims to explore the views of the Turkish elite on the state of polarization in Turkey. By identifying four political frames—namely, harmony, continuity/decline, conspiracy, and conflict—that selected Turkish political and civil society elites use in discussing the phenomenon of polarization in the country through their contributions to a workshop and in-depth qualitative interviews, the article finds that there is a considerable degree of polarization among the Turkish elite regarding their views on the presence of polarization in Turkey. Moreover, this overlaps with the divide between the government and the opposition in the country. An analysis of the justificatory arguments employed in constituting the aforementioned frames shows that, while those elites who deny the existence of polarization seek its absence in essentialist characteristics of society, in reductionist comparisons with history, or in internal/external enemies, those who acknowledge polarization’s presence look for its roots in political and institutional factors and processes. The article highlights how, given the denial of polarization by the pro-government elite and the substantial gap between the two camps’ justificatory narratives, the currently reported high rates of polarization in Turkey can, at best, be expected to remain as is in the near future, barring a radical change in political constellations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hall, Scott S. "FCS and Political Polarization." Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences 114, no. 1 (March 1, 2022): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.14307/jfcs114.1.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Prior, Markus. "Media and Political Polarization." Annual Review of Political Science 16, no. 1 (May 11, 2013): 101–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Political polarization"

1

Hong, Jung-Min. "Political Polarization and Independent Voters in American Politics." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1439301969.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ullman, Shaundra J. "Partisanship: An Analysis of Polarization." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2014. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/813.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sattley, Harrison. "Voter Income, Demographics, and Political Polarization." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2019. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2223.

Full text
Abstract:
Using data from the American National Election Studies from 1968 to 2016, I explore the historical relationship between voter income, other demographic factors, and political polarization. I find that while having a higher income and a better education generally correlates with increased Republican political preference, though the relationship between higher income and increased Republican preference does not hold in lower income groups. Race is by far the most significant indicator of political preference, with whites and blacks on opposite ends of the political spectrum, and Hispanics as well as other races somewhere in between the two. In addition, I analyze the data from 20th century elections separately from 21st century elections and discover key differences in how each factor influences political preference.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lindqvist, Erik. "Essays on privatization, identity, and political polarization." Doctoral thesis, Stockholm : Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics (EFI), 2007. http://www2.hhs.se/efi/summary/733.htm.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mockabee, Stephen T. "Party polarization in American politics /." The Ohio State University, 2001. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1486572165277406.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zywiol, Douglas Lawrence Jerome. "Increasing Polarization of the Youth Vote." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/103880.

Full text
Abstract:
On July 1, 1971, the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified which prohibited states from denying citizens who had attained the age of eighteen the right to vote. Having passed 96-0 in the Senate and 401-19 in the House of Representatives, the amendment was widely considered a bipartisan effort with minimal resistance from within the two major political parties. This paper seeks to determine how this largely politically unifying amendment process became so politicized since its passage, including an analysis and comparison of factions who fought against initial passage with those who seek to suppress the youth vote. A historical analysis will look deeper into how those battles were won with the ultimate passage of the amendment. Using a mixed methodology approach including a quantitative analysis of polling data and a qualitative analysis of partisan methods to influence youth voter turnout, the paper shows a trend towards increased politicization that has peaked in today's political landscape. Three specific elections serve as case studies and a lens through which to analyze changes in the law, changes in campaign strategies, changes in rhetoric, and changes in salient issues. Youth engagement is particularly valuable to political leaders and to the nation. In American politics, youth voter turnout has become less of a normative good--in many cases it has been deeply politicized. There is a strong association between specific methods taken by political parties and interest groups and their efforts to mobilize or disincentive youth voter turnout.
Master of Arts
A Constitutional amendment requires two-thirds of the House of Representatives and two-thirds of the Senate to propose it and then must be ratified by three-fourths of the states. This process is difficult to accomplish and one that requires bipartisanship in Congress and must have broad support throughout the nation. Outside of the original Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments, only seventeen amendments have been ratified since the inception of the Constitution. The Twenty-Sixth Amendment is an important milestone in the history of the United States as it ultimately lowered the voting age to 18 throughout the country. The amendment passed 96-0 in the Senate and 401-19 in the House of Representatives and was passed by the necessary number of states in less than four months. It marked the quickest ratification timeline of any amendment in the history of the United States. The amendment was a largely bipartisan effort with minimal resistance from within the two major political parties. This paper seeks to determine how this largely politically unifying amendment process has become so politicized since its passage. The paper shows a trend towards increased politicization that has peaked in today's political landscape. Three specific elections serve as case studies and a lens through which to analyze changes in attitudes about young voters. As a high school teacher who values the importance of youth engagement and voting, I provide some strategies that I believe will help overcome the level of polarization and voter suppression laws that have recently been enacted. Both of the two major political parties have an incentive to engage young voters and encourage them to show up for their side.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kansco, Jacob Anthony. "Effects of Social Media Use on Political Polarization." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/99081.

Full text
Abstract:
21st century political science has seen a growing field of research focused around the idea of political polarization. While authors like Fiorina and Abramowitz have been debating the existence of such polarization, the literature has come to understand that perhaps the root of the issue lies in differing definitions. The never-ending quest for clarity has produced a variety of measures of polarization and, subsequently, theories on why 21st century Americans may be experiencing such polarization. Unsurprisingly, as political science questions what may be causing various trends in 21st century voter behaviors and attitudes, the Internet is often mentioned. With the Internet being a clearly powerful tool for political mobilization, whether or not it is divisive among the public could have politically consequential implications. Because of its interactive nature, it is difficult to evaluate a person's social media use. This study uses a unique survey to evaluate a respondent's general social media and internet use, as well as measures of political polarization. Using this information, along with analysis of the 2016 ANES, I am able to make associations of various levels of social media activity and political polarization. Using means comparison and multivariate regression, I am able to evaluate social media use controlling for effects of age and other confounding variables and how it relates to measures of political polarization. The survey results ultimately provide some evidence for the claim that increasing social media use is associated with higher levels of political polarization. Additionally, in an OLS regression model testing the effects of different sources of political news, increases in internet use are highly correlated with an increase in political polarization.
Master of Arts
Since the 2016 US Presidential election, there have been increasing concerns over how divided the country is getting. Part of the reason why people feel so polarized is likely being exaggerated by social media and breaking news headlines. While Americans may be closer on the issues than they care to believe, the perception of a divided country may be just as consequential. It is difficult to say to what degree our country is truly polarized, if at all. What we can be sure of is that political activists are able to be heard much louder given the platform of the internet. What motivates people to spend hours of their day scrolling through platforms like Facebook is an individual preference, but it is clear that these companies can directly profit from click-bait news headlines. In order to explore the degree to which different groups are polarized in America, I used an online survey asking respondents about their internet use and political leanings. Using this information, I am able to see what associations might exist between things such as amount of time spent on social media per day and how committed one is to their ideology. These measures themselves are widely debated in political science, so the study also aims to examine in what ways different measures of polarization may be used effectively. The results of the study do find some evidence that increased social media use is correlated with an increase in political polarization. However, other measures of political activity on the internet are seen to be highly correlated with an increase in political polarization.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lee, Jae Mook. "The political consequences of elite and mass polarization." Diss., University of Iowa, 2012. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3333.

Full text
Abstract:
Is the American electorate ideologically polarized as its representatives are polarized in Congress? How ordinary citizens have responded to growing elite polarization? The goal of this dissertation project is to answer these two questions. I conceptualize polarization here as having multi-dimensional characteristics and distinguish between polarization as a state and polarization as a process. Based on the conceptualization of polarization, I argue here that most existing literature has not only focused on polarization as a presence, but the empirical strategies adopted by previous research are more appropriate for assessing the existence rather than gradual polarization as a process. I assume that the degree of ideological polarization among the mass public would not be dramatic, thus scholars are more likely to be divided regarding the existence of popular polarization due to the less apparent changes in public opinion distribution. Therefore, I propose here using relative distribution method to evaluate a level of opinion polarization developed in the other field of social science. Using the alternative method, we can assess how a comparison cohort of a recent period is more or less polarized compared to a reference cohort of a previous period. I first apply the relative distribution method to congressional roll-call data (DW-NOMINATE) to demonstrate the distributional comparison analysis on quantile bases. Then I analyze the cumulative American National Election Study (ANES) 1948-2008 survey to assess the relative degree of mass ideological polarization. As I analyze ideological preference of individuals, I construct the two ideological measures based on a factor analysis, rather than using a combined single indicator. In addition to the analysis of mass opinion polarization as a whole, this dissertation also examines some political consequences of ideological polarization both at elite and mass levels focusing on mass political awareness and engagement. In particular, I also test if heterogeneous effects of polarized political environment exist on citizens conditional on their existing levels of political resources such as political knowledge or formal education. Just as many detailed characteristics of distribution might be untapped by summary measures (e.g., mean), behavior of extremists might not be explained properly by the conventional regression analysis based on conditional mean effect. While the ordinary regression analysis focuses on the representative characteristics of a majority in the sample, in polarization analysis we are more often interested in the behavior of extremists placed far from the mean. So I adopt a qunatile regression to account for potentially differential responses of the mass public to polarized politics depending on their positions in the distribution of a dependent variable. Empirical evidence suggests that polarizing political environment has brought about many significant changes in mass political attitudes and behavior. I demonstrate that the distributional center of measures of political ideology have progressively declined in later periods, though the opinion distribution of the later periods do not dramatically exhibit a text-book style polarized distribution (e.g., bimodal distribution). In addition, I find that the majority of mass public has responded to the changing political environment by becoming politically more aware. Therefore, the overall findings of this project indicate that the electoral link between the elite and the masses became either transformed or is transforming rather than being broken as the mass public assimilate the polarized politics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Karim, Jena. "Polarization of political culture : Islam and Pakistan, 1958-1988." Thesis, McGill University, 2004. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=83114.

Full text
Abstract:
This study examines the relationship between Islam and political culture in Pakistan in the four decades following its naissance. It assesses the validity of the argument that a polarity has emerged in the Pakistani political culture, consisting of Islamism and Islamic modernism. In the case of Pakistan, Islamism refers to the use of the primary sources of Islam law, the Qur'an, hadith, and sunnah, in crafting both policy and political institutions. Islamic modernism refers to the systematized use of these primary sources as well as other (external) sources, adjusted for contemporary circumstances. These ideologies, as defined here, are gleaned from the discourse of a Pakistani ideologues, Sayyid Abu'l A 'la Mawdudi and Fazlur Rahman. It examines the thought of Mawdudi and Rahman as the discursive backdrop to the polarity of political culture. It then provides analysis of three regimes which exacerbate this polarity. They include the Islamic modernist regime of Ayub Khan, from 1958 to 1969, the quasi-Islamist regime of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, from 1971 to 1977, and finally the Islamist regime of General Zia ul-Haq, from 1977 to 1988.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fadji, Sama Serena Dean. "What is the True Cost of Mass Polarization? : A Study of the Relationship Between Political Polarization and Trust in Political Institutions in the United States." Thesis, Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-79954.

Full text
Abstract:
Democracy is defined by the element of competition. Elite party competition has become one of the most discussed contemporary developments in the United States. Elected representatives from the main parties have become internally homogeneous, deepening the divide of ideologies between one another. This thesis seeks to establish the relationship between mass partisan polarization and the level of trust in political institutions across the United States. What happens when the public trusts the Elites more than Congress? Elite polarization has divided the masses so deeply in the U.S by electing representatives from the two major parties whom carry ideologies so distinct from another that the public begin change their ways of forming opinions. This thesis acknowledges that there is high elite and mass political polarization in the U.S., which is attributed to the heterogeneity in ideologies across the three main political parties (Democrats, Republicans and Independents) and intra-party homogeneity. The elite partisan theoretical framework expounds the relationship such that the public tends to hold a low level of trust towards the U.S. congress because majority of voters’ partisan motivated decision making is influenced by political endorsements. The implication is that the public is more likely to hold a considerable level of trust towards their political parties as opposed to the U.S. congress.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Political polarization"

1

Persily, Nathaniel, ed. Solutions to Political Polarization in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316091906.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Keefer, Philip. Social polarization, political institutions, and country creditworthiness. Washington, D.C: World Bank, Investment Climate and Public Services Teams, Development Research Group, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Han, Sang Won. The Mechanisms of Elite Political Polarization in America. [New York, N.Y.?]: [publisher not identified], 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

1965-, Weiler Jonathan Daniel, ed. Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Baumer, Donald C. Parties, polarization, and democracy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

1958-, Gold Howard J., ed. Parties, polarization, and democracy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Julia, Bauder, ed. Is the political divide harming America? San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Prooijen, Jan-Willem van. Psychology of Political Polarization. Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hetherington, Marc J., and Thomas J. Rudolph. Political Trust and Polarization. Edited by Eric M. Uslaner. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.15.

Full text
Abstract:
Trust in government in the United States has become increasingly polarized along partisan lines. Republicans and Democrats are now quite reluctant to trust government when the other party is in power. This chapter explores the sources and consequences of polarized political trust. Analysis of panel data suggests that polarized trust is the result of negative affect toward opposing partisans and a motivated reasoning process in which partisans place greater weight on the evaluative criteria that favor their preferred political party. The chapter further shows that polarized trust has important consequences for individuals’ policy preferences. We explain how the polarization of political trust has contributed to ongoing political dysfunction in Washington. In particular, the results suggest that the polarization of trust encourages party leaders to do what is best for their political party even if it is not best for the larger public interest.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Prooijen, Jan-Willem van. Psychology of Political Polarization. Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Political polarization"

1

Kim, Wook. "Political polarization." In Routledge Handbook of Korean Politics and Public Administration, 112–26. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315660516-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Traldi, Oliver. "Polarization as sorting." In Political Beliefs, 163–76. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003355274-23.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Traldi, Oliver. "Polarization as extremism." In Political Beliefs, 177–87. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003355274-24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hannon, Michael, and Elise Woodard. "Polarization and Partisanship." In Political Epistemology, 211–44. London: Routledge, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003089483-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Prinz, Jesse. "Emotion and Political Polarization." In The Politics of Emotional Shockwaves, 1–25. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56021-8_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ferguson, Iain. "Responding to political polarization." In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Social Work, 523–35. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge international handbooks: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351264402-45.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Rossini, Patrícia. "Incivility and polarization." In The Routledge Handbook of Political Campaigning, 427–37. London: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003333326-36.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Altschuler, Daniel, and Javier Corrales. "Political Obstacles: Patronage and Polarization." In The Promise of Participation, 130–46. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137271846_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bielefeldt, Heiner. "A Recipe for Political Polarization?" In Edition Politik, 121–30. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.14361/9783839468272-010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Doherty, William J., and Tai J. Mendenhall. "Braver Angels: Counteracting political polarization." In Becoming a citizen therapist: Integrating community problem-solving into your work as a healer., 93–111. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0000378-008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Political polarization"

1

Neacsu, Razvan-Gabriel, and Adrian Otovescu. "THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION IN THE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ERA: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ONLINE POLITICAL DISCOURSE." In 11th SWS International Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES - ISCSS 2024, 89–96. SGEM WORLD SCIENCE, 2024. https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2024/s01.13.

Full text
Abstract:
The research will employ a content analysis methodology to examine a sample of 50 articles from various online sources, including news websites, political blogs, and social media posts. The articles will be selected based on their relevance to political communication and their potential impact on public opinion. The analysis will focus on identifying the dominant themes, rhetorical strategies, and persuasive techniques used in the selected articles. The study will develop a coding scheme to systematically categorize and analyze the content of the articles. The coding scheme will include variables such as the main topics addressed, the tone and sentiment of the language used, the use of evidence and arguments, and the inclusion of multimedia elements. The coding process will be conducted by trained coders to ensure reliability and consistency in the analysis. Through the content analysis, the study aims to uncover the characteristics and trends in online political discourse. It will examine how political actors frame their messages, engage with their audiences, and respond to political events and issues. The analysis will also explore the potential impact of online political communication on public opinion, political attitudes, and electoral behavior. Furthermore, the study will discuss the implications of the findings for the democratic process and the quality of political discourse in the digital era. It will consider the potential risks and challenges associated with online political communication, such as the spread of misinformation, the polarization of public opinion, and the erosion of trust in political institutions. The study will also explore the role of media literacy and critical thinking skills in helping citizens navigate the complex landscape of online political discourse.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fitrani, Arif Senja, Martin William, Dini Adni Navastara, Diana Purwitasari, Yudhi Purwananto, and Agus Budi Raharjo. "Polarization-Affinity of Indonesian Political Figures: Insights from Network of Twitter Followers with Modularity Clustering and Linear Arrangement." In 2024 7th International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), 211–16. IEEE, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/icoiact64819.2024.10913292.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Chan, Chung-hong, and King-Wa Fu. "Predicting Political Polarization from Cyberbalkanization." In WebSci '15: ACM Web Science Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2786451.2786509.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

M. Otala, Jacqueline, Gillian Kurtic, Isabella Grasso, Yu Liu, Jeanna Matthews, and Golshan Madraki. "Political Polarization and Platform Migration:." In WWW '21: The Web Conference 2021. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3452305.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hanna, Alexander, Chris Wells, Peter Maurer, Lew Friedland, Dhavan Shah, and Jörg Matthes. "Partisan alignments and political polarization online." In the 2nd workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2508436.2508438.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shi, Yongren, Kai Mast, Ingmar Weber, Agrippa Kellum, and Michael Macy. "Cultural Fault Lines and Political Polarization." In WebSci '17: ACM Web Science Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091520.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lai, Mirko, Cristina Bosco, Viviana Patti, and Daniela Virone. "Debate on political reforms in Twitter: A hashtag-driven analysis of political polarization." In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dsaa.2015.7344884.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Takikawa, Hiroki, and Kikuko Nagayoshi. "Political polarization in social media: Analysis of the “Twitter political field” in Japan." In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258291.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sinno, Barea, Bernardo Oviedo, Katherine Atwell, Malihe Alikhani, and Junyi Jessy Li. "Political Ideology and Polarization: A Multi-dimensional Approach." In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Garcia, David, Fernando Mendez, Uwe Serdült, and Frank Schweitzer. "Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media." In the first edition workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2389661.2389665.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Political polarization"

1

Kempf, Elisabeth, and Margarita Tsoutsoura. Political Polarization and Finance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w32792.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gadarian, Shana, Jay Van Bavel, Eric Knowles, and Kai Ruggeri. Political Polarization Harms Public Health. Syracuse University: Syracuse University Libraries, November 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.14305/rt.lerner.2024.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Baker, Scott, Aniket Baksy, Nicholas Bloom, Steven Davis, and Jonathan Rodden. Elections, Political Polarization, and Economic Uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w27961.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Coibion, Olivier, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, and Michael Weber. Political Polarization and Expected Economic Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w28044.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Fos, Vyacheslav, Elisabeth Kempf, and Margarita Tsoutsoura. The Political Polarization of Corporate America. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w30183.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Enke, Benjamin, Mattias Polborn, and Alex Wu. Morals as Luxury Goods and Political Polarization. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w30001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Boxell, Levi, Matthew Gentzkow, and Jesse Shapiro. Is the Internet Causing Political Polarization? Evidence from Demographics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23258.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Canen, Nathan, Chad Kendall, and Francesco Trebbi. Political Parties as Drivers of U.S. Polarization: 1927-2018. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w28296.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Autor, David, David Dorn, Gordon Hanson, and Kaveh Majlesi. Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w22637.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Vlaicu, Razvan. Inequality, Participation, and Polarization: Economic Origins of Partisan Policies. Inter-American Development Bank, November 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0005264.

Full text
Abstract:
The upward co-movement of income inequality and partisan polarization in the United S is typically attributed to intensified class conflict or a political wealth bias. This paper formalizes a theory of polarization where changes in the income distribution do not affect citizens' policy preferences, but instead change their patterns of political participation: aggregate voting decreases relative to aggregate giving, reducing the electoral penalty for partisan policies. By endogenizing party composition, the model captures both the ideological and compositional dimensions of polarization, and addresses less-discussed polarization features, such as intra-party homogeneity and the increase in safe seats. According to the model, observed polarization patterns imply that parties have diverged more than candidates, and that the gap between party and candidate divergence has increased with income inequality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Political polarization' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography