Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Polluter Pays Principle

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Polluter Pays Principle'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 3 May 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Polluter Pays Principle.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Polluter Pays Principle"

1

Stoczkiewicz, Marcin. "The polluter pays principle and State aid for environmental protection." Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 6, no. 2 (2009): 171–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/161372709x12496542612327.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe polluter pays principle is one of the Treaty-based principles of the Community environmental law. It provides that the polluter is financially liable for compliance with the requirements set by the existing legislation concerning environmental protection and has, therefore, i.a. been referred to as non-subsidisation principle. Nonetheless, the polluter pays principle is also a key principle within the European Commission's practice of controlling State aid for environmental objectives. This contribution explores the apparent paradox of basing the policy on controlling State aid for environmental protection on the polluter pays principle and delineates approaches to reconcile that principle with State aid practice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Ulfah, Zhafirah, and Nellyana Roesa. "The Implementation of Polluter-Pays Principles on Marine Pollution Caused by Vessels in Indonesia (The Study of Oil Spill Cases)." Syiah Kuala Law Journal 4, no. 2 (August 31, 2020): 198–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v4i2.17847.

Full text

Abstract:

Nowadays, there are some marine pollution cases caused by oil spill from vessels. These cases give a significant impact on marine environment and threatening human’s life. Therefore, law enforcement is needed.One of the principles that can be used in solving this problem is Polluter-Pays principles. This principle found in the 16th principle of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development on 2002. The requirement of the principle is cost of pollution should be borne by the person responsible for causing the pollution. National authorities should endeavor to promote the internalization of environmental costs and the use of economic instruments. This article aims to find out the implementation of polluter pays principles in Indonesia, especially in study of oil spill. Polluter pays principle can be used as one of solution in helping country overcome the loses oil spill cases within Indonesian waters. One of the challenges is Indonesia need a specific instrument used as a mechanism for calculating the loss or damage that should be paid by the polluters.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Sugianto, Fajar, Sanggup Leonard Agustian, and Nisa Permata Basti. "EKSISTENSI PRINSIP PENCEMAR MEMBAYAR DALAM SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM AGRARIA." TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL 4, no. 1 (August 6, 2020): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v4i1.41790.

Full text

Abstract:

Law Number 32 of 2009 concern about Environmental Protection and Management does not provide adequate regulation in providing sanctions against perpetrators of pollution, except only providing a legal basis for employers to provide compensation payments to victims of pollution. Therefore it is necessary to know about the position of the Polluter Pays Principle in the Environmental Legal System as Agrarian Reform. The principle of paying polluters who have the function of authorizing should not be formulated in the explanatory section of the article. If following the explanation of Law No. 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management, the purpose of the principle of polluter pays, even has many meanings such as paying to pollute or can be interpreted as a license to pollute. As a result of the study of international law, the principle of polluter pays has two meanings, namely as an economic instrument with the intention of charging fees to potential polluters and is also interpreted as a basic instrument to hold legal liability for incidents of environmental pollution.Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup tidak memberikan pengaturan memadai dalam memberikan sanksi terhadap pelaku pencemaran, kecuali hanya memberikan landasan hukum bagi pengusaha untuk memberikan pembayaran kompensasi kepada korban pencemaran. Oleh karena itu perlu mengetahui mengenai kedudukan Prinsip Pencemar Membayar (Polluter Pays Principle) dalam Sistem Hukum Lingkungan Sebagai Reformasi Agraria. Prinsip Pencemar Membayar yang memiliki fungsi mengesahkan seharusnya tidak dirumuskan dalam bagian penjelasan pasal. Jika mengikuti penjelasan Undang-undang No. 23 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, maka maksud Prinsip Pencemar Membayar, bahkan memiliki banyak pemaknaan seperti membayar untuk mencemari (paying to pollute) atau dapat dimaknai sebagai license to pollute. Hasil telaah hukum internasional, prinsip pencemar membayar memiliki dua pemaknaan, yaitu sebagai instrumen ekonomi dengan maksud pembebanan biaya kepada pelaku pencemar yang potensial dan diartikan juga sebagai instrument dasar untuk menuntut pertanggungjawaban hukum atas terjadinya kasus pencemaran lingkungan.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Mossoux, Youri. "Causation in the Polluter Pays Principle." European Energy and Environmental Law Review 19, Issue 6 (December 1, 2010): 279–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eelr2010020.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to show the limits of the discretionary power that EU primary law provides for public authorities in determining the polluter in order to allocate the costs of pollution under the polluter pays principle. According to the ECJ, the polluter is a person who by his activity contributes to the risk that pollution occurs. Hence, public authorities may not classify someone as a polluter if he did not cause the pollution. Causation in the polluter pays principle can be compared to causation in civil liability. When the legislator predetermines the polluter in the legislation, he uses ex ante causal probabilities, but when public administrations or national courts identify the polluter in a concrete case they should use the condition sine qua non theory. This is confirmed by secondary legislation and case law, especially in the fields of waste management, environmental liability.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Huber, Claus, and Franz Wirl. "The Polluter Pays versus the Pollutee Pays Principle under Asymmetric Information." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35, no. 1 (January 1998): 69–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1997.1017.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Ambec, Stefan, and Lars Ehlers. "Regulation via the Polluter‐pays Principle." Economic Journal 126, no. 593 (December 24, 2014): 884–906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12184.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Nanda, Ved P. "Agriculture and the Polluter Pays Principle." American Journal of Comparative Law 54, suppl_1 (2006): 317–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/54.suppl1.317.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Okky Octavianti, Anis Dwi, Adinda Hilda Rachmania, Maria Adisti,. "PENERAPAN PRINSIP PENCEMAR MEMBAYAR DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PENCEMARAN LIMBAH B3 OLEH PT. PRIA MOJOKERTO (Implementation Polluter Pays Principle of B3 Waste Pollution Responsibility by PT. PRIA Mojokerto)." Res Nullius Law Journal 3, no. 2 (July 29, 2021): 152–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v3i2.4322.

Full text

Abstract:

Environmental pollution carried out by economic actors in the economic process needs to be borne by the economic actors who pollute, namely responsibility for the restoration of a polluted environment. PT PRIA as a B3 waste management company that has carried out landfilling which has caused environmental pollution is obliged to provide an accountability for the impacts that have been caused. The application of the polluter pays principle is required by PT PRIA in this accountability. Because the principle of polluter pays itself is closely related to the provisions of responsibility for pollution to the environment. This study uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analysis. This method is carried out by examining library materials on legal principles or legal principles. The results of this study indicate that as a form of responsibility for the many negative impacts caused by B3 waste by PT. PRIA, the PT is obliged to provide compensation for the impacts that have been caused. This responsibility is in line with the provisions of the UUPPLH which regulates the polluter pays principle which is part of the corporate responsibility in environmental management. Pencemaran lingkungan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku ekonomi dalam proses ekonomi perlu dibebankan kepada pelaku ekonomi yang melakukan pencemaran yaitu pertanggungjawaban akan pemulihan lingkungan yang tercemar. PT PRIA sebagai perusahaan pengelolaan limbah B3 yang telah melakukan penimbunan yang menimbulkan pencemaran lingkungan wajib untuk memberikan pertanggung jawaban atas dampak yang telah ditimbulkan. Penerapan prinsip pencemar membayar diperlukan oleh PT PRIA dalam pertanggungjawaban tersebut. Karena prinsip pencemar membayar sendiri erat hubungannya dengan ketentuan pertanggungjawaban atas pencemaran terhadap lingkungan hidup.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan analisis deskriptif. Metode ini dilakukan dengan meneliti bahan pustaka terhadap asas-asas hukum atau prinsip-prinsip hukumnya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sebagai bentuk pertanggung jawaban atas banyaknya dampak negatif yang ditimbulkan dari limbah B3 oleh PT. PRIA, maka PT tersebut wajib memberikan ganti rugi atas dampak yang telah ditimbulkan.Pertanggungjawaban tersebut sejalan dengan ketentuan UUPPLH yang mengatur tentang sistem pencemar membayar (polluter pays principle) yang merupakan bagian dari tanggung jawab korporasi dalam pengelolaan lingkungan.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Petrenko, A. A. "The Role of International Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development in the Formation of Principles of International Environmental Law." Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 1 (July 2, 2022): 370–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.01.67.

Full text

Abstract:

This article studies the significance and role of the regulatory activity of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development in the formation of the principles of such a comparatively new field of international law as international environmental law. It is shown that although at the time of its creation in 1960, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development was in no way an international organization of environmental character, but since the early 1970s, environmental issues have become an important area of international legal cooperation under the auspices of this organization. In 1971, an Environmental Protection Committee was formed within the OECD, now called the Environmental Policy Committee. During the 1970s, under the auspices of the OECD, the Recommendations on Guiding Principles concerning International Economic Aspects of Environmental Policies of 1972 and the Recommendation on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle of 1974 were adopted, enshrining the polluter-pays principle, which imposes on the polluter the costs of implementing pollution prevention and control measures to ensure that the environment is in good condition. The provisions of the OECD Recommendation on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle of 1974 were quickly implemented in the law of the European Communities and today the Lisbon version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union contains it in paragraph 2 of Article 191, together with such principles of the European Union's environmental policy as the precautionary principle, the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source. The «polluter pays» principle is normatively enshrined only in The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development of 1992, The Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents of 1992, etc. Regulatory activity under the auspices of the OECD were also essential for the establishment and formation of such principles of international environmental law as the principle of preliminary environmental impact assessment, the principle of undiminished environmental protection of other states and areas beyond national jurisdiction, etc.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Bleeker, Arne. "Does the Polluter Pay? The Polluter-Pays Principle in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice." European Energy and Environmental Law Review 18, Issue 6 (December 1, 2009): 289–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eelr2009024.

Full text

Abstract:

The principle that the “polluter should pay” has been one of the guidelines of EC environmental policy for decades. Nonetheless, a number of problems continue to stand in the way of its effective application. Most importantly, the principle itself does not define who the polluter is, what pollution is or to what extent the polluter needs to pay. This article is an assessment of the role the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has played in answering these questions. It is argued that the Court has adopted an extensive interpretation of the principle, especially in the recent Erika judgment. In that sense, the ECJ has certainly contributed to a more effective and enforceable polluter-pays principle in the EC legal order. However, the impact of the ECJ’s interpretation is of course limited by the boundaries set by EC legislation. Policies are needed to move towards a European Union in which the polluter actually does pay. Judgments can only serve to buttress and clarify such legislation. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the three main cases in which the ECJ has been called upon to interpret the polluter-pays principle (Standley, Van de Walle and Erika). The focal point is the Erika judgment, as this is both the most recent and most far-reaching. In all three judgments, the Court emphasizes that any application of the principle has to be proportional. Polluters cannot be asked to pay for pollution damage beyond their contribution to the creation of that pollution. The Court has not shied away from defining “pollution” in a broad sense in both Van de Walle and Erika. Establishing who the “polluter” is, however, has proven far more difficult. Of particular interest is whether the producer of the product might be held liable in the case of the accidental creation of pollution, such as an environmental disaster. In the Erika case, the Court very significantly introduces a risk liability standard; product producers might be deemed “polluters” solely on the basis of their contribution to the risk of pollution. This is a significant development from Van de Walle, in which the Court considered a direct causal link or negligent behaviour necessary for product producer liability. In addition, Erika underlines that Member States cannot limit the scope of the polluter-pays principle in EC secondary legislation, even if this leads to a contradiction with a Member State’s international obligations such as the International Oil Pollution Compensation regime. In short, the Erika judgment builds on Standley and Van de Walle but adds significant impetus to the polluter-pays principle at the EC level. However, the risk liability standard it establishes will be difficult to apply and it remains to be seen how the legislator will react to the Court’s extensive interpretation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Polluter Pays Principle"

1

Yuen, Wai-ip Edmond, and 袁偉業. "Polluter pays principle laws in Hong Kong." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1996. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31253623.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Yuen, Wai-ip. "Polluter pays principle laws in Hong Kong /." Hong Kong : University of Hong Kong, 1996. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record.jsp?B17457166.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Yuen, Wai-ip Edmond. "A study of polluter pays principle policy in Hong Kong /." View the Table of Contents & Abstract, 2005. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record/B31365097.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Yuen, Wai-ip Edmond, and 袁偉業. "A study of polluter pays principle policy in Hong Kong." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2005. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B45012738.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Nabileyo, Oversea. "The polluter pays principle and environmental liability in South Africa / by Oversea Nabileyo." Thesis, North-West University, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10394/4712.

Full text

Abstract:

Environmental liability rules are crucial in a country such as South Africa. The issue of liability pertaining to pollution of or harm to the environment is a critical area in our law as environmental liability is not adequately addressed in terms of South African law.1 Liability law is thus directed towards the objectives of damage prevention and the distribution of loss in accordance with considerations of social justice. Liability law is necessary in order to prevent environmental pollution or degradation. An example of pollution to the environment is when goods are transported and a traffic accident occurs, which results in the spillage of harmful substances. Harmful substances may for instance be easily transmitted to surface water or underground water. These substances may have adverse effects on human health and the environment.
Thesis (LL.M. (Import and Export Law))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2010.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Chien, Li-Fen. "Do existing laws in South Africa hold directors personally liable for environmental transgressions?" University of the Western Cape, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8008.

Full text

Abstract:

Magister Legum - LLM
The number of environmental offences taking place continues to increase each year. Despite the special position of responsibility occupied by directors as the ‘directing mind and will’ of the companies responsible for the commission of these offences, directors appear to continue to be shielded unconditionally behind the separate legal personality of the company. This thesis consists of a thorough examination of existing environmental laws, as well as the Companies Act 71 of 2008 and the King IV Report on Corporate Governance, to determine whether the provisions contained therein may be interpreted so as to depart from the principle of separate legal personality (as provided for by corporate law) in order to hold directors personally liable for environmental transgressions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Arnqvist, Angelica. "The Compatibility of EU State Aid for Environmental Protection with the Polluter Pays Principle : In the Context of the EU Emissions Trading System." Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-168924.

Full text

Abstract:

This thesis, examines three research questions concerning the coherence between the European Union (EU) rules about State aid for environmental protection and the “polluter-pays-principle” (PPP) in the context of the free allocation practice in the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). The aim of the first research question is to study whether the free allocation of emission rights within the EU ETS is compatible with the EU State aid rules. The conclusion to this research question is that the free allocation practice does fulfil the criteria to constitute State aid but that the Commission has permitted derogations against this prohibition, provided certain conditions such as necessity and proportionality are fulfilled. The second research question is whether the free allocation method is compatible with the PPP. The PPP can be divided into an economic dimension and a legal dimension and it is concluded that the free allocation practice is contrary to at least the legal dimension of the PPP. According to the OECD, exceptions from the principle can be made but the EU has not established conditions for when such derogations from the PPP can be made. The third research question concerns the compatibility between the EU State aid rules and the PPP. Generally there is no disharmony between the State aid rules and the PPP, since the PPP should not be seen as a mere prohibition against aid to polluters, but can also be considered a complement to State aid rules. However in the specific case of the free allocation rules in the EU ETS, State aid measures contrary to the PPP are carried out. Since the EU has not established conditions for whether derogations from the PPP can be made, it is concluded that the free allocation practice within the EU ETS does expose a disharmony between the PPP and the State aid rules. It is suggested that the EU clarifies the conditions for permitting derogations from the PPP, in preparation for the fourth phase of the EU ETS.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Carlson, Jonna. "Principen att förorenaren betalar och den svenska miljöbalken." Thesis, Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics, 2000. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-727.

Full text

Abstract:

Kostnader förenade med återställande av förorenad natur är ofta stora och frågan är vem som skall betala. I princip finns det tre grundmönster för fördelningen av betalningsansvaret: kollektivt ansvar, individuellt ansvar och gruppansvar. Betalningsansvaret för miljöskador flyttas i allt högre grad från staten till enskilda förorenare. Detta synsätt överensstämmer också med den allmänna skadeståndsrättsliga principen att den som orsakar en skada är skyldig att reparera eller ersätta densamma. Finansieringssättet baserat på individuellt ansvar har formulerats i principen att förorenaren betalar, Polluter Pays Principle eller PPP. Sverige är en av de stater som bekänner sig till principen. Det faktum att principen har svagheter som innebär att den är svår att tillämpa i praktiken gör det intressant att se närmare på hur principen kommer till uttryck i svensk miljörätt. Syftet med uppsatsen är att utreda hur principen att förorenaren betalar kommer till uttryck i den svenska miljöbalken.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Johansson, Malin. "Munksund 5 : En rättsutredning gällande miljöbalkens efterbehandlingsansvar vid en miljöförorening." Thesis, Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-74255.

Full text

Abstract:

Munksund 5 är namnet på en timmerbogseringsbåt som sedan år 1964 ligger under vattenytan i Piteälven. Båten sägs ha förlist med upp emot 6 000 liter tjockolja kvar i tankarna. Det finns idag ingen registrerad ägare till båten. Sommaren 2018 observerades en stor oljefläck i närheten av båtens position. Det bekräftar en miljöförorening men det är fortfarande inte fastställt att oljan kom från Munksund 5. Syftet med denna uppsats har varit att undersöka hur miljöbalken reglerar efterbehandlingsansvaret vid en miljöförorening. Frågeställningarna som väglett arbetet är vad principen om att förorenaren betalar innebär samt vem som kan anses ha avhjälpandeansvaret efter Munksund 5. För att uppfylla syftet med uppsatsen har den rättsdogmatiska metoden använts. Utgångspunkten för metoden är att studera de allmänt accepterade rättskällorna. Av resultatet framgår att det är avgörande om Munksund 5 är att anse som en fristående delverksamhet eller som en integrerad verksamhet med sågverket, för att ansvar ska kunna riktas mot den tidigare verksamhetsutövaren. Det allmänna kommer att få stå för hela, eller stor del, av kostanden för de eventuella efterbehandlingsåtgärderna.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Ramos, Valéria Theodoro. "Les instruments économiques et le droit de l'environnement dans l'ordre juridique français et brésilien." Thesis, Paris 1, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA010289.

Full text

Abstract:

L'étude comparative des droits français et brésilien démontre que la fiscalité, en tant qu'instrument juridique d'intervention économique, peut être au service de la protection de l'environnement. L'évolution des principes directeurs du droit de l'environnement, notamment le principe pollueur-payeur vers celui d'intégration, témoigne de la transformation de la prise en compte de l'environnement. Le principe pollueur-payeur reste circonscrit à la question des coûts. Le principe d'intégration, en tant que principe opératoire, est directement en rapport avec la prise de décision des agents publics et privés. Il permet (et même exige) la conciliation des systèmes juridiques fiscaux et environnementaux. La thèse fait apparaître l'ascension de la fiscalité comme instrument des politiques environnementales dans l'Union européenne et en France. Plus encore, on observe la place centrale que doit jouer en principe une fiscalité respectueuse de l'environnement dans la notion même du développement durable. En France, la maturité du débat dans le contexte du Grenelle de l'environnement montre que tous les instruments de protection, réglementaires et économiques - tels que les instruments fiscaux, sont censés être inscrits dans une politique publique cohérente de l'environnement. Au Brésil le développement durable est juridiquement consacré. Cette reconnaissance demande l'assainissement de l'ordre fiscal brésilien. Sans avoir besoin d'une réforme constitutionnelle, les incitations existantes doivent être aménagées pour éviter des effets négatifs sur l'environnement
Comparison between Brazilian and French law shows that taxation, as legal economic intervention tool, is intended to serve the protection of the environment. The evolution of the guiding principles of the environment law, most notably the move from the polluter-payer to the integration principles, shows that the environment is more and more taken into account. The polluter-payer principle is limited to costs. The integration principles, as an operating principle, has a direct connection with the decision making process used by private and public agents. It allows, and even demands, the conciliation of tax and environmental laws systems. If, within the European context, this evolution is clear within the French law, in Brazil the integration principles is barely known, even unknown. However, we believe it to be explicitly recognized by the Brazilian Constitution. Within the economic and social orders, protection of the environment is guaranteed. The State, as an agent of the Market, requires that impact analyses on the environment are made. It does so using tax benefits mechanism. ln this document, we are showing the evolution of the taxation as an instrument used for the environmental policies in the European Community and in France. Moreover, we can verify the central position of the "eco-friendly tax system" within the notion of sustainable development. ln France, the maturity of the debate, within the "Grenelle de l'environnement" context, allow us to understand that every protective instruments, whether regulated or economics - like the taxations -, are supposed to be part of a greater public policy which en sure their coherence

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Polluter Pays Principle"

1

R, Grossman Margaret, British Institute of International and Comparative Law., and International Congress of Comparative Law (17th : 2006 : Utrecht, The Netherlands), eds. Agriculture and the polluter pays principle. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

R, Grossman Margaret, British Institute of International and Comparative Law., and International Congress of Comparative Law (17th : 2006 : Utrecht, The Netherlands), eds. Agriculture and the polluter pays principle. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

R, Grossman Margaret, British Institute of International and Comparative Law., and International Congress of Comparative Law (17th : 2006 : Utrecht, The Netherlands), eds. Agriculture and the polluter pays principle. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology., ed. The polluter pays principle and cost recovery charging. London: Parliamentary Office of Sience and Technology, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Turner, R. Kerry. Environmental policy: An economic approach to the polluter pays principle. Norwich: CSERGE, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

D. W. David William Pearce. Packaging waste and the polluter pays principle: A taxation solution. Norwich: CSERGE, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Transport, welfare and externalities: Replacing the Polluter Pays Principle with the Cheapest Cost Avoider Principle. Cheltenham, Glos, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Graham, Bennett, and Institute for European Environmental Policy., eds. Agriculture and the polluter pays principle: A study of six EC countries. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

1963-, Lawlor J., and Scott Sue, eds. The fiscal system and the polluter pays principle: A case study of Ireland. Aldershot, Hants., England: Brookfield, Vt., 1997.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Deering, N. The polluter pays principle: A comparison of charging systems in Europe and the USA. Dublin: Trinity College, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Polluter Pays Principle"

1

Sadeleer, Nicolas de. "Polluter pays principle." In Essential Concepts of Global Environmental Governance, 194–95. Second edition. | Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780367816681-78.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Aragão, Alexandra. "Polluter-Pays Principle." In Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism, 1–24. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_163-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Humphreys, Matthew. "The polluter pays principle." In Sustainable Development in the European Union, 72–87. Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.9781315611471_6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Verbruggen, Aviel. "Electric Power System Transition and the “Polluter Pays Principle”." In Springer Proceedings in Energy, 419–34. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45659-1_44.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Schmalenbach, Kirsten. "International Standards for National Environmental Liability Regimes." In Corporate Liability for Transboundary Environmental Harm, 131–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13264-3_5.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractCivil liability conventions are generally seen as instruments that push the costs of pollution into the polluter’s sphere, thereby implementing the ‘polluter pays principle’ (Chap. 2 ¶10 (Sect. 2.2.1)). If ratified, they have many advantages when compared to national tort laws: First, they facilitate cross-border lawsuits within their scope of application as civil liability conventions harmonise the domestic tort regimes in all the contracting States. Second, civil liability conventions introduce strict liability whereas general tort law is based on fault or negligence. In terms of disadvantages, at least from an environmental law perspective, is the fact that civil liability conventions serve to shield operators from exposure to excessive claims via liability caps, which is a deviation from the full-compensation principle of tort law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Mittiga, Ross. "Allocating the Burdens of Climate Action: Consumption-Based Carbon Accounting and the Polluter-Pays Principle." In Transformative Climates and Accountable Governance, 157–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97400-2_8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Borowy, Iris. "Negotiating Environment: The Making of the OECD Environment Committee and the Polluter Pays Principle, 1968–1972." In The OECD and the International Political Economy Since 1948, 311–34. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60243-1_13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Irozi, Mohd Filza Ikmal, Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail, Sarva Mangala Praveena, Aida Soraya Shamsuddin, and Nazri Che Dom. "The Contribution of Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) Approach on Environmental Pollution Reduction and Health Risk for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)." In Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 69–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93932-8_6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Boklan, Daria. "Channeling of Liability: Shall Arctic States Be Liable for Environmental Harm in the Arctic Caused by Navigation or Polluter Pays Principle Should Prevail?" In Arctic Fever, 451–69. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9616-9_17.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Steenge, Albert E. "On Background Principles for Environmental Policy: “Polluter Pays”, “User Pays” or “Victim Pays”?" In Public Priority Setting: Rules and Costs, 121–37. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1487-2_7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Polluter Pays Principle"

1

Petrašević, Tunjica, and Paula Poretti. "THE ‘POLLUTER PAYS’ PRINCIPLE: THE CROATIAN EXPERIENCE." In The recovery of the EU and strengthening the ability to respond to new challenges – legal and economic aspects. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/22408.

Full text

Abstract:

The ‘polluter pays’ principle (PPP) is one of the four tenets of the European Union’s (EU) environmental policy. Where the PPP is successfully applied, the polluter bears the cost of pollution, including the cost of prevention, control, and removal of pollution, as well as the cost it causes for the society and the respective population. The PPP is to discourage polluters from environmental pollution by holding them liable for the pollution by means of having the polluters, and not the taxpayers, bear the remediation cost. This paper juxtaposes the application of the PPP in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Croatian jurisprudence. Following an overview of the PPP in EU law, the paper briefly reviews two CJEU cases (Van de Walle and Erika) that concern the question of whether liability for incidental pollution is attachable to both the manufacturer of dangerous material and the polluter. Next, the paper examines the application of the PPP in the Croatian judiciary, where – contrary to the EU environmental policy – the remediation cost being borne by the taxpayers is seemingly the norm (especially where the polluter cannot bear the remediation cost due to insolvency).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Lindskog, S., and R. Sjöblom. "Implementation of the polluter pays principle – example of planning for decommissioning." In ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS 2010. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/eeia100031.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Pons-Rigat, Aleix, Mateu Turró Calvet, and Lluís Ubalde Claver. "Applying the polluter-pays principle to rail: Environmental differentiation of rail access charges." In CIT2016. Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/cit2016.2016.4050.

Full text

Abstract:

Environmental charges to rail service operators are still at an early stage of implementation in Europe. Current schemes are dissimilar and most of them have a very limited scope or do not provide effective incentives to abate environmental impacts. This is due to several practical difficulties in implementing internalisation pricing schemes in the railway sector. The first difficulty arises from the lack of internalisation in other transport modes and the small competitive margin of railways. Increasing the overall level of rail charges could affect their survival. A second difficulty is due to the uncertainties in the valuation of external costs and in the establishment of the optimal level of charges. On top of that, the imperfect competition in the rail market and its operational and financial rigidities imply that pricing decisions could be unfair and produce undesired demand effects. These difficulties should not prevent, however, advancing towards the application to rail of adequate charging methods for its environmental costs. This paper addresses the problem of setting environmentally differentiated rail charges through an analytical approach. A generalised formulation is developed that sets the level of charges as a function of the degree of internalisation in other modes. Then, the optimal trade-off in the level of differentiation is assessed to extract general guidelines. Based on this, both the derived overall costs and benefits and the impacts on each agent are quantified.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/CIT2016.2016.4050

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Počuča, Milan, and Jelena Matijašević-Obradović. "MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND APPLICATION OF THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE." In 4th International Scientific Conference: Knowledge based sustainable economic development. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia et all, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.708.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Labor, Bea, and Staffan Lindskog. "Planning for Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: Some Views of Younger Stakeholders." In ASME 2011 14th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2011-59222.

Full text

Abstract:

One of the prerequisite for nuclear power to be regarded as a sustainable energy source is that no burden be put on future generations. One important step in the financial and technical planning for decommissioning is therefore to investigate, describe and explain the opinions and values of especially the younger stakeholders. In this article, some results from current field studies in Poland and Slovakia are presented. The aggregated survey is based on 1444 personal interviews in four towns in Poland and one geographic area in Slovakia with a near 100% response rate. The main conclusions from this field study may be summarised as follows: • Sustainable energy sources are favoured (nuclear power may be included if waste is managed properly). • Nuclear power is seen as a potential future semi-sustainable energy source by nearly 1/4th of the respondents. • The values are based on safety and environmental aspects. • The polluter pays principle (extended polluter responsibility) is accepted. • There are doubts regarding the compliance with these principles in the implementation of the disposal of the nuclear residues. • Means and modes of communication with the younger stakeholders need further development. • No difference in views was found between the sexes. • Nearly one 1/5th of the respondents are open to accept reprocessing.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Labor, Bea, and Staffan Lindskog. "On Evaluation of Assessments of Accruals of Future Dismantling Costs." In ASME 2013 15th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2013-96100.

Full text

Abstract:

A major prerequisite in order for civilian commercial nuclear energy production to qualify as sustainable energy production is that systems for the management of the nuclear waste legacy are in operation. These waste types are present in a range from very low short lived waste (VLLW) to long lived high level waste (HLW) (including the used nuclear fuel). The second prerequisite is that financial responsibilities or other constraints must not be passed on to coming generations. The first condition for qualification corresponds to the Polluters Pays Principle (PPP) which demands that the responsibility for the waste management rests solely with the polluter. The second qualification corresponds to the principle of fairness between generations and thus concerns the appropriate distribution of responsibilities between the generations. It is important to note that these two conditions must be met simultaneously, and that compliance with both is a necessary prerequisite in order for commercial use of nuclear power to qualify as a semi-sustainable energy source. Financial and technical planning for dismantling and decommissioning of nuclear installations cannot be regarded as successful unless it rests upon a distinctive way to describe and explain the well-founded values of different groups of stakeholders. This cumbersome task can be underpinned by transparent and easy to grasp models for calculation and estimation of future environmental liabilities. It essential that a systematic classification is done of all types of costs and that an effort is done to evaluate the precision level in the cost estimates. In this paper, a systematic and transparent way to develop a parametric approach that rest upon basic accounting standards is combined with data about younger stakeholder’s values towards decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear installation. The former entity rests upon theoretical and practical methods from business administration, whilst the latter is based on current survey data retrieved from 667 personal interviews in one town in Poland and one town in Slovakia with a near 100 % response rate. The main conclusions from this field study may be summarised as follows: • Sustainable energy sources are prioritised. • Around one quarter of the respondents regards nuclear power as a future semi-sustainable commercial energy production mode subject to that the waste is managed in a sustainable, environmental friendly and safe way. • The values are to a significant degree positioned on health, safety and environmental (HSE) attributes. • The polluter pays principle is honoured. • There are doubts regarding the compliance with these principles due to risks for delays in the implementation phase of repositories for disposal of the nuclear residues. • 1/5th of the respondents expressed an openness to reprocessing (which is linked to the concept of “new nuclear power”).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ivanov, Metodi. "SPECIFIC FEATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT POLICY AND ITS IMPACT ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES." In 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference 2022. STEF92 Technology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s23.098.

Full text

Abstract:

The environmental management system should be considered as part of the overall management system. This involves looking at the organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining environmental policy. Basic principles and requirements of the environmental management system are aimed at identifying, researching, controlling and reviewing the factors influencing the environment, which allow businesses and public organizations to formulate policies and objectives aimed at protection of the environment. By introducing an environmental management system, organizations simultaneously declare, declare their commitment and guarantee to society as a whole that they are genuinely committed to solving environmental problems. European environmental policy is based on the principle of precautionary measures, preventive action and the elimination of pollution at source, as well as on the principle of "polluter pays". The European Union has the power to take action on all matters of environmental policy such as air and water pollution, waste management and climate change. Although some powers are limited as a result of the principle of subsidiarity and the requirement for unanimous agreement in the Council on fiscal issues, issues related to urban and spatial planning, land use, quantitative management of water resources, choice of energy sources and the structure of energy supply. The purpose of this article is to present specific features of environmental management policy and its impact on regional development in developing countries.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Oranye, Nkechinyelu, and Adeola Adenikinju. "£55M Shell Petroleum Development Company's Compensation to the Bodo Fishermen and Community: The Effectiveness of Polluter Pays Principle in the Liability Settlement." In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/203763-ms.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Stojanović, Predrag. "O EKONOMSKIM INSTRUMENTIMA ZA ZAŠTITU ŽIVOTNE SREDINE U OBLASTI DRUMSKOG SAOBRAĆAJA." In XVIII Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xviiimajsko.947s.

Full text

Abstract:

Due to the fact that all modes of traffic contribute significantly to pollution, road traffic is often at the top of the list. In accordance with the "polluter pays" principle, the application of economic instruments for environmental protection seeks to act in such a way as to encourage the behavior of economic entities in the direction of reducing pollution within the market. The range of these instruments is wide - from the so-called environmental taxes and fees, through subsidies to other incentives. Although it is widely believed that economic instruments are more efficient than administrative ones, in practice they are most often used in parallel and in combination. The answer to the question of whether a certain economic instrument will work purposefully will depend primarily on whether the application of that instrument satisfies its stimulating role.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Kunsch, Pierre L. "Externalities and Internalisation of Radioactive Waste Producing Activities: The Analogy With Environmental Practices." In ASME 2001 8th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2001-1135.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract All human activities generate negative externalities, in particular the use of radioactive material for electricity production and radioisotope applications. Both activities produce radioactive waste, which can, therefore, be considered as being specific externalities. The purpose of the paper is to investigate these externalities and to identify appropriate internalisation instruments. Analogue cases in environmental management are discussed. In general the nuclear externalities are not internalised in the management costs charged by Radioactive Waste agencies (RAWA). The paper explores the possibility of having an internalisation of all costs as requested by the strict application of the Polluter Pays Principle. In the case of electricity production a comparison is made between the externalities attributed to nuclear waste and those in relation with CO2-emissions from the combustion of fossil fuel. A brief overview is given on the evaluation approach in ExternE (“Externalities of Energy”). The evaluations are the basis for the design of a carbon tax applicable to fossil fuels for reducing CO2-emissions. A similar tax could be charged on radioactive waste management. Beyond the internalisation objective, the tax proceeds could finance the technological R&D for improving the conditions of storage and disposal, and provide compensations to local residents in the vicinity of nuclear waste management facilities. The management of spent radioisotope equipment in medicine, research, or industry is shown to have similar features to the management of packages, spent electrical appliances, and the disposal of batteries. In general the price of management of the spent material is not included in the purchase price. In case of spent radioisotope equipment, the externality mainly represents the risk of this material becoming a hazard for the public health. It is recommended to internalise the full costs of management to eliminate this risk. Moreover spent material should be registered and RAWA should maintain detailed inventories on their national territories. In order to induce the free return of spent material to the RAWA, deposit refund systems could be set in place as in the package or battery market. A surcharge is paid by purchase, which is refunded to the buyers when they return the product for recycling or proper disposal. The paper concludes by describing lessons and possible implications of the previously discussed environmental tax or surcharge systems on the way the Polluter-Pays Principle is applied in radioactive waste management.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!