Academic literature on the topic 'Port Privatization'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Port Privatization.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Port Privatization"

1

Montero Llacer, Francisco J. "Port privatization in Panama." Marine Policy 30, no. 5 (2006): 483–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2005.06.017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cullinane, Kevin, and Dong-Wook Song. "Port privatization policy and practice." Transport Reviews 22, no. 1 (2002): 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441640110042138.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Pian, Feng, Lili Xu, Yuyan Chen, and Sang-Ho Lee. "Global Emission Taxes and Port Privatization Policies under International Competition." Sustainability 12, no. 16 (2020): 6595. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12166595.

Full text
Abstract:
This study considers two asymmetric ports under international competition in which each country has a hub port and a private manufacturer and investigates strategic interactions between port privatization and emission tax policies. We emphasize the key role of the relative market size between the two countries and show that in a privatization choice game, port privatization is a dominant strategy in a larger country, but it will be chosen by a smaller country only if its relative market size is not so small. We also show that the coordination of global emission taxes before privatization choices can induce the equilibrium of the game to be globally optimal when the emission tax is relatively high. This finding provides an important policy implication on the climate change that coordinated global environmental policy is imperatively required in the port privatization policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Frankel, Ernst Gabriel. "Debt—equity conversion and port privatization." Maritime Policy & Management 19, no. 3 (1992): 201–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/751248661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Matsushima, Noriaki, and Kazuhiro Takauchi. "Port privatization in an international oligopoly." Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 67 (September 2014): 382–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

조세 통젠, 최경숙, and Young-Tae CHANG. "Port efficiency and privatization: Bayesian approach." Journal of Shipping and Logistics 34, no. 1 (2018): 87–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.37059/tjosal.2018.34.1.87.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Burkhalter, Larry A. "Port privatization, labour reform and social equity." CEPAL Review 1995, no. 57 (1995): 57–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/94ff81ec-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bassett, Keith. "British port privatization and its impact on the port of Bristol." Journal of Transport Geography 1, no. 4 (1993): 255–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(93)90050-a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bennett, Michael. "Private sector responses to port privatization in India." Maritime Policy & Management 22, no. 3 (1995): 261–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03088839500000063.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sinha, Deepankar, and Shuvo Roy Chowdhury. "Optimizing private and public mode of operation in major ports of India for better customer service." Indian Growth and Development Review 12, no. 1 (2018): 2–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/igdr-08-2017-0056.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThe Government of India announced its liberalization policy in the year 1991. Since then, the major ports in India introduced privatization in various forms into their operations. However, the share of total traffic (cargo) handled by major ports fell from 90 per cent in 1991 to around 70 per cent in 2015, losing share to minor ports. These major ports, except for the port of Kamarajar, are governed by the Major Port Trust Act, 1961. None of the Indian ports feature amongst the top 20 ports of the world. Interestingly, several ports in Asia, namely, seven ports from China, Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaysia are on that list. Several studies and reports have shown that privatization in India did not yield the desired results. Ports in India have adopted a hybrid mode of governance, aligned between a landlord port model and a service port model. This paper aims to address the question – What is the optimal way to mix privatisation and government control in the operations of major ports of India.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the authors attempt to develop an optimization model for port planners to decide on the optimum mix of privatized and self-managed operations so as to maintain efficiency and maximize revenue.FindingsThe model tested on a major port in the country shows that the present privatization policy followed by the port needs revision. A similar plan to revise their policies can be carried out for other major ports in the country.Originality/valueThe model is generic and can be used by any port in the world operating under conditions similar to those in India.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography