Academic literature on the topic 'Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa"
Charles Matseke. "Land Reform in South Africa." Thinker 88, no. 3 (September 6, 2021): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.36615/thethinker.v88i3.601.
Full textWalker, Cherryl, and Prodipto Roy. "Land Reform and Gender in Post-Apartheid South Africa." Social Change 29, no. 3-4 (September 1999): 333–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004908579902900426.
Full textGumede, Vusi. "Land reform in post-apartheid South Africa: Should South Africa follow Zimbabwe's footsteps?" International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity 9, no. 1 (January 2, 2014): 50–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2014.916877.
Full textLeyshon, Donald John. "Land Reform, Restitution and Entitlement in Post-Apartheid South Africa." Journal of Southern African Studies 35, no. 3 (September 2009): 755–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070903101953.
Full textLahiff, Edward. "Stalled Land Reform in South Africa." Current History 115, no. 781 (May 1, 2016): 181–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/curh.2016.115.781.181.
Full textO'Sullivan, Siobhan. "Land and justice in South Africa." Boolean: Snapshots of Doctoral Research at University College Cork, no. 2010 (January 1, 2010): 135–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.33178/boolean.2010.31.
Full textMaake, Manala Shadrack. "LAND REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA: OBSTINATE SPACIAL DISTORTIONS." Africanus: Journal of Development Studies 46, no. 1 (December 9, 2016): 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/0304-615x/1234.
Full textMseba, Admire. "Book Review: Femke Brandt and Grasian Mkodzongi (Eds.), Land Reform Revisited: Democracy, State Making and Agrarian Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa." Insight on Africa 11, no. 1 (January 2019): 131–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0975087818805885.
Full textFortin, Elizabeth. "Struggles with activism: NGO engagements with land tenure reform in post-apartheid South Africa." Journal of Modern African Studies 48, no. 3 (August 18, 2010): 383–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x10000340.
Full textKelly, Jill E. "Land Reform for a Landless Chief in South Africa: History and Land Restitution in KwaZulu-Natal." African Studies Review 64, no. 4 (November 23, 2021): 884–908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/asr.2021.76.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa"
Robertson, Michael. "Segregation Land Law and Post-Apartheid Land Reform in South Africa." Thesis, Griffith University, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367227.
Full textThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy by Publication (PhD)
Griffith Law School
Arts, Education and Law
Full Text
Fortin, Elizabeth. "Arenas of Contestation: Policy Processes and Land Tenure Reform in Post-Apartheid South Africa." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2008. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_6486_1264557568.
Full textThis thesis considers different groupings that have come together in their participation in the policy processes relating to tenure reform in post-apartheid South Africa. It is methodologically and theoretically grounded in Bourdieu&rsquo
s notion of cultural &lsquo
fields&rsquo
, spaces of ongoing contestation and struggle, but in which actors develop a shared &lsquo
habitus&rsquo
, an embodied history. In these land reform policies and law-making activities, individuals and groups from different fields &ndash
the bureaucratic, activist and legal &ndash
have interacted in their contestations relating to the legitimation of their forms of knowledge. The resulting compromises are illuminated by a case study of a village in the former Gazankulu &lsquo
homeland&rsquo
&ndash
a fourth &lsquo
cultural field&rsquo
. Rather than seeing these fields as bounded, the thesis recognises the influence of wider political discourses and materialities, or the wider &lsquo
field of power&rsquo
. In each of the four very different fields, as a result of a shared history, actors within them have developed practices based upon particular shared discourses, institutions and values.
Fortin, Elizabeth. "Arenas of contestation: Policy processes and land tenuse reform in post-apartheid South Africa." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.488606.
Full textMaduna-Mafu, Nqobani. "Land and agrarian reform, and rural livelihoods in post-apartheid South Africa : a study on the Ehlanzeni District in Mpumalanga Province." Thesis, University of Fort Hare, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10353/4514.
Full textMathiane, Makwena T. "The influence of ideology upon land policy of the post apartheid government of the Republic of South Africa, 1994 - 2004." Thesis, University of Limpopo (Turfloop Campus), 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/786.
Full textSince 1913 black South Africans have been forcefully dispossessed of land under the racist land laws of the successive white South African governments. In 1994 the black government began to pass land laws that were supposed to provide blacks with land ownership rights. Ten years later blacks have re-claimed less than four percent of the eighty seven percent of the land they were dispossessed of. The failure to return dispossessed land to blacks is attributed to the ideology of the current government with respect to its land policy. This study attempts to fill the void regarding the ideological implications of the land reform policy of the post-apartheid government. We speculate that neo-liberal implications are dominant within this policy. Social democracy can overcome the failure of the policy as it is cost-effective and efficient and attempts to achieve social justice. It can therefore afford dispossessed and landless blacks land ownership.
Mkhize, Siphesihle Ceswell. "What is the agenda of the rural land social movements in post apartheid South Africa?: a case study of the Tenure Security Coordinating Committee (TSCC)." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2005. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&.
Full textHall, Ruth. "The politics of land reform in post-apartheid South Africa, 1990 to 2004 : a shifting terrain of power, actors and discourses." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.547756.
Full textNkosi, Nolwazi Nontombi Maria. "The role of non-governmental organisations in land reform and post-settlement support in the Albany district of the Eastern Cape : a case study of Masifunde." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1020321.
Full textLubambo, Pascalina Thandiwe. "An appraisal of post-transfer production trends of selected land reform projects in the North West Province, South Africa." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27631.
Full textDissertation (MInstAgrar)--University of Pretoria, 2012.
Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development
unrestricted
Dube, Phephelaphi. "Reconsidering historically based land claims." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1836.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The 1996 Constitution provides in s 25(7) that individuals and communities who had been dispossessed of rights in land after 19 June 1913, as a result of past discriminatory laws, may claim restitution or equitable redress. The Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994 reiterates the 1913 cut-off date for restitution claims. The cut-off date appears to preclude pre-1913 land dispossessions. Various reasons are cited for this date, the most obvious being that it reflects the date on which the Black Land Act came into effect. The Richtersveld and Popela decisions of the lower courts appear to confirm the view that historically based land claims for dispossessions that occurred prior to 1913 are excluded from the restitution process. In Australia and Canada restitution orders have been made possible by the judicially crafted doctrine of aboriginal land rights. However, historical restitution claims based on this doctrine are constrained by the assumption that the Crown, in establishing title during colonisation, extinguished all existing titles to land. This would have meant that the indigenous proprietary systems would have been lost irrevocably through colonisation. In seeking to overcome the sovereignty issue, Australian and Canadian courts have distinguished between the loss of sovereignty and the loss of title to land. In this way, the sovereignty of the Crown is left intact while restitution orders are rendered possible. South African courts do not have to grapple with the sovereignty issue since post-apartheid legislation authorises the land restitution process. The appeal decisions in Richtersveld and Popela recognised that some use rights survived the colonial dispossession of ownership. This surviving right was later the subject of a second dispossession under apartheid. By using this construction, which is not unlike the logic of the doctrine of aboriginal title in fragmenting proprietary interests, the second dispossession could then be said to meet the 1913 cut-off date, so that all historically based land claims are not necessarily excluded by the 1913 cut-off date. However, it is still possible that some pre-1913 dispossessions could not be brought under the umbrella of the Richtersveld and Popela construction, and the question whether historically based restitution claims are possible despite the 1913 cut-off date will resurface, especially if the claimants are not accommodated in the government’s land redistribution programme
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die 1996 Grondwet bepaal in a 25(7) dat individue en gemeenskappe wat na 19 Junie 1913 van ‘n reg in grond ontneem is, as gevolg van rasgebaseerde wetgewing en praktyke, geregtig is om herstel van sodanige regte of gelykwaardige vergoeding te eis. Die Wet op Herstel van Grondregte 22 van 1994herhaal die 1913-afsnydatum vir grondeise. Dit lyk dus asof die afsnydatum die ontneming van grond voor 1913 uitsluit. Verskeie redes word vir hierdie datum aangevoer, waarvan die bekendste is dat dit die datum is waarop die Swart Grond Wet in werking getree het. Dit beslissing van die laer howe in beide die Richtersveld- en die Popela-beslissings bevestig blykbaar dat ontneming van grond of regte in grond voor 1913 van die restitusie-proses uitgesluit word. In Australië en Kanada is restitusiebevele moontlik gemaak deur die leerstuk van inheemse grondregte. Historiese restitusie-eise in hierdie jurisdiksies word egter aan bande gelê deur die veronderstelling dat die Kroon, deur die vestiging van titel gedurende kolonialisering, alle vorige titels op die grond uitgewis het. Dit sou beteken dat die inheemsregtelike grondregsisteme onherroeplik verlore geraak het deur kolonialisering. Ten einde die soewereiniteitsprobleem te oorkom het die Australiese en Kanadese howe onderskei tussen die verlies van soewereiniteit en die verlies van titel tot die grond. Op hierdie wyse word die soewereiniteit van die Kroon onaangeraak gelaat terwyl restitusiebevele steeds ‘n moontlikheid is. Suid-Afrikaanse howe het nie nodig gehad om die soewereiniteitskwessie aan te spreek nie omdat post-apartheid wetgewing die herstel van grondregte magtig. Die appélbeslissings in Richtersveld en Popela erken dat sekere gebruiksregte die koloniale ontneming van eiendom oorleef het. Die oorblywende gebruiksregte is later ‘n tweede keer ontneem as gevolg van apartheid. Deur gebruikmaking van hierdie konstruksie, wat dieselfde logika volg as die leerstuk van inheemsregtelike regte en berus op fragmentasie van eiendomsaansprake, kan gesê word dat die tweede ontneming van grond wel binne die 1913-afsnydatum val. Gevolglik sal alle historiese restitusie-eise nie noodwendig deur die 1913- afsnydatum uitgesluit word nie. Dit is steeds moontlik dat sommige pre-1913 ontnemings nooit onder die vaandel van die Richtersveld- en Popela-beslissings gebring sal kan word nie, en die vraag of histories gebaseerde eise moontlik is ongeag die 1913-afsnydatum sal daarom weer opduik, veral indien die grondeisers nie geakkommodeer word in die grondherverdelingsprogram van die staat nie.
Books on the topic "Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa"
Walker, Cherryl. Land reform and gender in post-apartheid South Africa. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Gender, Poverty and Well-Being, 1998.
Find full textFragile freedom: South Africa democracy 1994-2004. Pretoria: University of South Africa Press, 2008.
Find full textRudman, Annika. Equality before custom?: A study of property rights of previously disadvantaged women under land reform and communal tenure in post-apartheid South Africa. Gothenburg: School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, 2009.
Find full textMamphela, Ramphele, McDowell Chris, and Cock Jacklyn, eds. Restoring the land: Environment and change in post-apartheid South Africa. London: Panos, 1991.
Find full textDemocratizing higher education policy: Constraints of reform in post-apartheid South Africa. New York, NY: Routledge, 2005.
Find full textHart, Gillian. Disabling Globalization: Places of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa. University of California Press, 2002.
Find full textHart, Gillian. Disabling Globalization: Places of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa. University of California Press, 2002.
Find full textDisabling Globalization: Places of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Univ of Natal Pr, 2002.
Find full textEngel, Ulf, and Arrigo Pallotti. South Africa after Apartheid: Policies and Challenges of the Democratic Transition. BRILL, 2016.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa"
Wissink, Henry. "The Struggle for Land Restitution and Reform in Post-Apartheid South Africa." In Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, 57–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78701-5_5.
Full textSato, Chizuko. "Land Tenure Reform in Three Former Settler Colonies in Southern Africa." In African Land Reform Under Economic Liberalisation, 87–110. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4725-3_5.
Full textMore, Mabogo Percy. "Fanon and the Land Question in (Post)Apartheid South Africa." In Living Fanon, 173–85. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230119994_15.
Full textUlriksen, Marianne S. "A Racialised Social Question: Pension Reform in Apartheid South Africa." In One Hundred Years of Social Protection, 221–62. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54959-6_7.
Full textKlug, Heinz. "Chapter 9. Achieving Rights to Land, Water, and Health in Post- Apartheid South Africa." In Closing the Rights Gap, edited by LaDawn Haglund and Robin Stryker, 199–218. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/9780520958920-015.
Full textZenker, Olaf. "New Law Against an Old State: Land Restitution as a Transition to Justice in Post-Apartheid South Africa?" In Transition and Justice, 113–34. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118944745.ch6.
Full textMakino, Kumiko. "The Changing Nature of Employment and the Reform of Labor and Social Security Legislation in Post-Apartheid South Africa." In Non-Standard Employment under Globalization, 73–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230274310_4.
Full text"Khoisan Revivalism and Land Question in Post-Apartheid South Africa." In Land Reform Revisited, 199–220. BRILL, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004362550_011.
Full textNthai, Mukovhe Maureen. "Funding Rural Development in Post-Apartheid South Africa's Land Reform Programme." In African Perspectives on Reshaping Rural Development, 118–39. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2306-3.ch006.
Full text"The South African Land Reform since 1994: Policies, Debates, Achievements." In South Africa after Apartheid, 104–27. BRILL, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004326736_008.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Post-apartheid land reform, South Africa"
Minguzzi, Magda, Yolanda Hernandez Navarro, and Lucy Vosloo. "Traditional dwellings and techniques of the First Indigenous Peoples of South Africa in the Eastern Cape." In HERITAGE2022 International Conference on Vernacular Heritage: Culture, People and Sustainability. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/heritage2022.2022.15019.
Full textWhelan, Debbie. "Light Touch on the land – continued conversations about architectural change, informality and sustainability." In HERITAGE2022 International Conference on Vernacular Heritage: Culture, People and Sustainability. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/heritage2022.2022.15043.
Full textJappie, Naziema. "HIGHER EDUCATION: SUSTAINING THE FUTURE OF STUDENTS DURING A PANDEMIC." In International Conference on Education and New Developments. inScience Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36315/2021end128.
Full text