Relevant bibliographies by topics / Pragmatic rationality

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Pragmatic rationality'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 9 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Pragmatic rationality.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Pragmatic rationality"

1

Will, Frederick L. "Pragmatic Rationality." Philosophical Investigations 8, no. 2 (1985): 120–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.1985.tb00138.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McCLENNEN, EDWARD F. "Pragmatic Rationality and Rules." Philosophy Public Affairs 26, no. 3 (1997): 210–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00054.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Finkelstein, Claire. "Pragmatic Rationality and Risk." Ethics 123, no. 4 (2013): 673–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/670757.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

CLARK, RON. "Pragmatic Paradox and Rationality." Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24, no. 2 (1994): 229–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1994.10717367.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Verma, Niraj. "Pragmatic Rationality and Planning Theory." Journal of Planning Education and Research 16, no. 1 (1996): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9601600102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Marino, Patricia. "Moral Rationalism and the Normative Status of Desiderative Coherence." Journal of Moral Philosophy 7, no. 2 (2010): 227–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/174552409x12574076813478.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis paper concerns the normative status of coherence of desires, in the context of moral rationalism. I argue that 'desiderative coherence' is not tied to rationality, but is rather of pragmatic, instrumental, and sometimes moral value. This means that desire-based views cannot rely on coherence to support non-agent-relative accounts of moral reasons. For example, on Michael Smith's neo-rationalist view, you have 'normative reason' to do whatever your maximally coherent and fully informed self would want you to do, whether you want to do it or not. For these reasons to be non-agent-relative, coherence would have to be grounded in rationality, but I argue that it is not. I analyze, and reject, various strategies for establishing a coherence-rationality connection, considering in detail a purported analogy between desires and a priori beliefs, with particular attention to the case of mathematics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. "Grice in the wake of Peirce." Pragmatics and Cognition 12, no. 2 (2004): 295–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.12.2.06pie.

Full text
Abstract:
I argue that many of the pragmatic notions that are commonly attributed to H. P. Grice, or are reported to be inspired by his work on pragmatics, such as assertion, conventional implicature, cooperation, common ground, common knowledge, presuppositions and conversational strategies, have their origins in C. S. Peirce’s theory of signs and his pragmatic logic and philosophy. Both Grice and Peirce rooted their theories in normative rationality, anti-psychologism and the relevance of assertions. With respect to the post-Gricean era of pragmatics, theories of relevance may be seen to have been geared, albeit unconsciously, upon Peirce’s pragmatic agenda.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kennedy, Kate. "Ideal Cognition." Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal 11, no. 1 (2018): 106–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.33043/s.11.1.106-117.

Full text
Abstract:
Both the nature and aim of human cognition are philosophically divisive topics. On one side, there are the evidentialists who believe that the sole purpose of cognition is to seek and find truths. In contrast, pragmatists appeal to cognition solely as a tool, something that helps people achieve their goals. In this paper, I put forward an account of cognition and its aims fundamentally based on a pragmatic viewpoint.Crucially, however, I claim that an evolutionary pragmatic picture of cognition must assert rationality as a core tenant of human thought, mooring a relative pragmatism within a system logic and rationality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Schroeder, Mark. "RATIONAL STABILITY UNDER PRAGMATIC ENCROACHMENT." Episteme 15, no. 3 (2018): 297–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.24.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTIn this paper I will be concerned with the relationship between pragmatic encroachment and the rational instability of belief. I will be concerned to make five points: first, that some defenders of pragmatic encroachment are indeed committed to predictable rational instability of belief; second, that rational instability is indeed troublesome – particularly when it is predictable; third, that the bare thesis of pragmatic encroachment is not committed to rational instability of belief at all; fourth, that the view that Jake Ross and I have called the ‘reasoning disposition’ account of belief has the right structure to predict limited and stable pragmatic encroachment on the rationality of belief; and fifth and finally, that the very best cases for pragmatic encroachment are rationally stable in the right ways.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Goodman, Robert F. "William James: Rationality as a pragmatic choice." History of European Ideas 20, no. 4-6 (1995): 951–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(95)95834-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Pragmatic rationality"

1

Bellorini, Nicolas. "Normativity, rationality and the pragmatic turn." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2000. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5f417b92-8fff-4b1d-9b52-9bf83a1f5475.

Full text
Abstract:
The main claim defended is that a notion of discursive rationality emerges from the framework of Austinian speech act theory, and, moreover, is an appropriate tool for the resolution of the identified normativity problem. I thus propose a qualified endorsement of an approach owed in large part to Habermas's concept of communicative action.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Reed, James. "Pragmatic Encroachment, Evidentialism, and Epistemic Rationality." Ohio University / OhioLINK, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1470454095.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ouzilou, Olivier. "Analyse sociale et rationalité épistémique." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013AIXM3063.

Full text
Abstract:
Notre travail s'attache à examiner la spécificité ainsi que la pertinence du mode d'explication cognitiviste des croyances, tel qu'il est défini par Raymond Boudon, à travers, tout d'abord, une analyse de la notion de "rationalité épistémique" et un examen de certaines des objections qui peuvent lui être faites. Nous interrogeons ensuite la compatibilité de ce type d'explication avec l'idée, propre à un certain nombre de travaux en sciences sociales, selon laquelle les intérêts sociaux et/ou les mécanismes fonctionnels sont aptes à expliquer la formation des croyances. Enfin, nous réfléchirons à la question de savoir si la présence éventuelle de facteurs explicatifs mixtes doit nous inciter à repenser la question de la rationalité des croyances, c'est-à-dire ici de la contribution explicative des raisons au sein de leurs modes de formation. Cette interrogation nous mènera alors à une tentative d'élucidation de la notion de "contexte épistémique" ainsi qu'à un examen de sa pertinence explicative<br>My work aims at examining the specificity and the relevance of what Raymond Boudon calls 'the cognitivist model of belief explanation', through an analysis of the notion of 'epistemic rationality' and an examination of some objections against it. Then I ask the compatibility between this kind of explanation with the common idea in social science that social interests and functional mechanisms are relevant to explain the belief formation process. Finally, I will study the question of the influence of the plurality of explanative factors on the rationality of social agent's beliefs. This interrogation will lead us to an elucidation of the notion of 'epistemic context' and its explanative relevance
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Allott, Nicholas Elwyn. "Pragmatics & rationality." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2007. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1444091/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis is about the reconciliation of realistic views of rationality with inferential-intentional theories of communication. Grice (1957 1975) argued that working out what a speaker meant by an utterance is a matter of inferring the speaker's intentions on the presumption that she is acting rationally. This is abductive inference: inference to the best explanation for the utterance. Thus an utterance both rationalises and causes the interpretation the hearer constructs. Human rationality is bounded because of our 'finitary predicament': we have limited time and resources for computation (Simon, 1957b Cherniak, 1981). This raises questions about the explanatory status of inferential-intentional pragmatic theories. Gricean derivations of speakers' intentions seem costly, and generally hearers are not aware of performing explicit reasoning. Utterance interpretation is typically fast and automatic. Is utterance interpretation a species of reasoning, or does the hearer merely act as "reasoning Within the framework of cognitive science, mental processing is under stood as transitions between mental representations. I develop a traditional view of rationality as reasoning ability, where this is essentially the ability to make transitions that preserve rational acceptability. Following Grice (2001), I claim that there is a 'hard way' and a 'quick way' of reasoning. Work on bounded rationality suggests that much cognitive work is done by heuristics, processes that exploit environmental structure to solve problems at much lower cost than fully explicit calculations. I look at the properties of heuristics that find solutions to open-ended problems such as abductive inference, particularly sequential search heuristics with aspiration-level stopping rules. I draw on relevance theory's view that the comprehension procedure is a heuristic which exploits environmental regularities due to utterances being offers of information (Sperber & Wilson, 1986). This kind of heuristic, I argue, is the 'quick way' that reasoning proceeds in utterance interpretation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Collins, Peter J. "Rationality, pragmatics, and sources." Thesis, Birkbeck (University of London), 2017. http://bbktheses.da.ulcc.ac.uk/284/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis contributes to the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science. It introduces and explores a triangular scheme for understanding the relationship between rationality and two key abilities: pragmatics – roughly, inferring implicit intended utterance meanings – and learning from sources. The thesis argues that these three components – rationality, pragmatics, and sources – should be considered together: that each one informs the others. The thesis makes this case through literature review and theoretical work (principally, in Chapters 1 and 8) and through a series of empirical chapters focusing on different parts of the triangular scheme. Chapters 2 to 4 address the relationship between pragmatics and sources, focusing on how people change their beliefs when they read a conditional with a partially reliable source. The data bear on theories of the conditional and on the literature assessing people’s rationality with conditionals. Chapter 5 addresses the relationship between rationality and pragmatics, focusing on conditionals ‘in action’ in a framing effect known as goal framing. The data suggest a complex relationship between pragmatics and utilities, and support a new approach to goal framing. Chapter 6 addresses the relationship between rationality and sources, using normative Bayesian models to explore how people respond to simple claims from sources of different reliabilities. The data support a two-way relationship between claims and source information and, perhaps most strikingly, suggest that people readily treat sources as ‘anti-reliable’: as negatively correlated with the truth. Chapter 7 extends these experiments to test the theory that speakers can guard against reputational damage using hedging. The data do not support this theory, and raise questions about whether trust and vigilance against deception are prerequisites for pragmatics. Lastly, Chapter 8 synthesizes the results; argues for new ways of understanding the relationships between rationality, pragmatics, and sources; and relates the findings to emerging formal methods in psychology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lee, Mark. "Belief, rationality and inference : a general theory of computational pragmatics." Thesis, University of Sheffield, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.287357.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Frestadius, Simo Kalevi. "Whose Pentecostalism? Which rationality? : the Foursquare Gospel and Pentecostal biblical pragmatism of the Elim tradition." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2018. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/8318/.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of the thesis is to provide a tradition-specific 'Pentecostal rationality.' To do this it will first analyse and evaluate some of the main contemporary Pentecostal rationalities and' epistemologies (chapter 1), before proposing that Alasdair Macintyre's tradition-focused and historically-minded narrative approach is conducive in providing a more tradition-constituted Pentecostal rationality (chapter 2). Utilising the methodological insight of Macintyre, the thesis will then provide a philosophically informed historical narrative of a Pentecostal tradition, namely, the Elim Pentecostal Church, by exploring its underlying context and roots as a classical British Pentecostal movement (chapter 3), its emergence as a religious tradition (chapter 4), and its two major 'epistemological crises' (chapters 5 & 6). Based on this historical narration, the thesis will argue that Elim's tacit Pentecostal rationality is best defined as Pentecostal Biblical Pragmatism in a Foursquare Gospel framework. This form of rationality will then be developed vis-a-vis Elim's Pentecostal concept of truth (chapter 7), biblical hermeneutics (chapter 8), and pragmatic epistemic justification in dialogue with William Alston (chapter 9).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Swisher, Andrew Ryan. ""WAR IS THE ULTIMATE RATIONALITY": The Place of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in the American Founding Tradition." Ohio Dominican University / OhioLINK, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=odu1449232593.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kuruvilla, Shyama. "Seeking scientific sense and democratic sensibility : the quest for rationality in public policy and pragmatist philosophy, or, John Dewey and the case of elusive rationality in democratic practice : a brief for health policy." Thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (University of London), 2007. http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/768487/.

Full text
Abstract:
People who participate in policy-making, from government, academia, industry and civil society, would all prefer their perspectives be regarded as rational. There is little agreement, however, on what comprises rationality, with conflicting claims of 'scientific sense' and 'democratic sensibility', and disagreement on whether moral considerations are part of rational decision-making. Pragmatist philosopher John Dewey drew from the natural and social sciences, as well as his international political experience, to describe rationality as a characteristic of human agency. He posited that rationality should comprise scientific sense, democratic sensibility and moral imagination in order to resolve problematic situations and support individual and social flourishing. In instituting contemporary policy science, Harold Lasswell considered pragmatist philosophy to be its foundation. However, this pragmatist perspective has since been overlooked. Policy science developed with a primarily empirical focus on discrete aspects of policy-making. There is now an identified need for more integrative and normative theories to better understand and guide public policy. The primary goal of this thesis is to demonstrate that rationality, as defined in pragmatist philosophy, can integrate diverse considerations of policy theory and public participation. In order to make the philosophical concepts more operative, a new theory of policy-making - the Decision Cell 3 model - is developed. This model is structured according to key 'pillars' of pragmatist philosophy and shaped by contemporary theoretical and empirical analyses, particularly of health policy. Primary research on the impact of health services and policy research at LSHTM, and on UNICEFcivil society organisation partnerships with respect to children's rights, further informs the development and application of this model. The Decision Cell model also allows for a comparative analysis of normative frameworks for health policy. Mechanisms to facilitate adopting a pragmatist approach to rational policy-making are highlighted, as are the potential advantages and challenges of doing so.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hed, Anna. "Kategorier i kontrollerade ämnesordlistor : En kritik ur ett pragmatiskt perspektiv." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-413712.

Full text
Abstract:
Subject description is a linguistic practice, and therefore all controlled vocabularies are built upon theories of language. However, the underlying theories are rarely discussed in greater length. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate what epistemological foundations controlled vocabularies are built upon and what consequences that has for their internal structure. The main object of interest is the category. From a rationalistic point of view categories are universal and well defined. In a pragmatic point of view categories are contextual with fluid boundaries. A pragmatic point of view has been shown by Wittgenstein and Rosch to more accurately describe how language works, therefore the standpoint of this thesis is that a controlled vocabulary that takes a pragmatic approach will be a better tool for indexing and searching. The study is done in three parts. First the theoretical literature on knowledge organisation is investigated. The findings are that there is a divide among writers who take a rationalistic and pragmatic approach. Then, guidelines and principles from IFLA, LCSH, Svenska ämnesord and MeSH are examined. In all cases the rationalist view is favored but the quirks of language are handled in different ways. In IFLA's FRSAD, the writers claim to take no theoretical stance but in reality they take a rationalistic perspective. LCSH blame the inconsistencies in the system on the many people that have worked on it over a long period of time. SAO is built with LCSH as a role model and therefore have the same problems, although they have gone towards a more pragmatic approach. MeSH, however, acknowledges that language is more complicated, and the controlled vocabulary is built on a more pragmatic foundation. Lastly, examples from the controlled vocabularies are discussed. The finding is that, in practice, controlled vocabularies work in accordance with a pragmatic perspective. This is a two years master’s thesis in Library and Information Science.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Pragmatic rationality"

1

Rationality and modernity: Essays in philosophical pragmatics. Scandinavian University Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Skirbekk, Gunnar. Rationality and modernity: Essays in philosophical pragmatics. Scandanavian University Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Miščević, Nenad. Rationality and cognition: Against relativism-pragmatism. University of Toronto Press, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Clarendon Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

A system of pragmatic idealism. Princeton University Press, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nicholas, Rescher. A system of pragmatic idealism. Princeton University Press, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Postmodern rationality, social criticism, and religion. Paragon House, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

McGinty, Charles P. Preacher's kid: A journey from pious fundamentalism to pragmatic humanism. Ulster-Scot Publications, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

What is language development?: Rationalist, empiricist, and pragmatist approaches to the acquisition of syntax. Oxford University Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cambi, Franco, and Giovanni Mari, eds. Giulio Preti. Firenze University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6655-044-0.

Full text
Abstract:
In the period following the Second World War Giulio Preti was one of the leading exponents of Italian philosophy. A master of open critical thought, cultivated in the light of a rationalism that dialogued with, and integrated into his own philosophical model, many of the currents and stances of the global research scenario. Phenomenology, Marxism, pragmatism, neopositivism, transcendentalism and structuralism: in Preti all of these found an organic and original synthesis. Further, his particular brand of rationalist-critical thought touched on many aspects of philosophical knowledge: theoretical philosophy, the philosophy of science, that of language and that of art, from ethics to politics and even taking in the history of philosophy, offering authoritative contributions in every sphere. One hundred years after his birth, the University of Florence and the heir to the Faculty in which he lectured at length, the Faculty of Education, has decided to honour his memory with this anthology of studies, penned by former pupils and others and also by younger scholars, to once again focus the wealth of this thought and its, in many respects, current relevance. Even now, this particular brand of open, critical rationalism can offer a benchmark for addressing the new issues for philosophical reflection thrown up by modern society and culture.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Pragmatic rationality"

1

Koons, Jeremy Randel. "Pragmatism and Rationality." In Pragmatic Reasons. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230239579_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Schulz, Katrin. "A Pragmatic Solution for the Paradox of Free Choice Permission." In Uncertainty, Rationality, and Agency. Springer Netherlands, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4631-6_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rebuschi, Manuel, Maxime Amblard, and Michel Musiol. "Using SDRT to Analyze Pathological Conversations: Logicality, Rationality, and Pragmatic Deviances." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03044-9_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Rescher, Nicholas. "Pragmatism and Practical Rationality." In Pragmatism in Philosophical Inquiry. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30903-3_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Chen, Hsiang-Yun. "Plan Recognition, Indefinites, and the Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary." In Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Marciszewski, Witold. "Pragmatic Rationalism and Pragmatic Nominalism in the Lvov-Warsaw School." In Interdisciplinary Investigations into the Lvov-Warsaw School. Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24486-6_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Benz, Anton. "Pragmatics Between Experiment and Rationality: Response to Chapman." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Dewe, Bernd. "Lernen in der Wissensgesellschaft: Rationalität und Pragmatik in lebensbegleitenden Bildungsprozessen." In Lernen zwischen Vergewisserung und Ungewißheit. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91423-1_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"Pragmatic arguments." In Rationality and Dynamic Choice. Cambridge University Press, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511983979.006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"Pragmatic justification: Experiential awareness and pragmatic signs of the Foursquare Gospel." In Pentecostal Rationality. T&T CLARK, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567689412.0018.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Pragmatic rationality"

1

Makhovikov, Alexander Evgenievich. "ABOUT THE "REASONABILITY" OF THE MODERN RATIONAL ACTIVITY OF THE PERSON." In Russian science: actual researches and developments. Samara State University of Economics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46554/russian.science-2020.03-1-441/445.

Full text
Abstract:
The thesis that the emergence of a new post-non-classical type of rationality in the information society has also led to the formation of a new meaning of "rationality" in the modern rational activity of the individual. Its specific feature is that this “rationality” turns into a kind of pragmatic matrix, the epistemological foundation of which, instead of objective true knowledge, is information. This inevitably leads to overcoming the differences between the real and the unreal, the authentic and the unauthentic, between the true and the false in the rational activity of the modern person. The concept of “rationality” for it now includes such meanings as heterogeneity, eclecticism, combining incompatible, pluralism and the right to the equal existence of different paradigms, as well as the ability to overcome binary thinking, where the boundaries of any ontological certainty are erased.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ishomuddin, Mr. "From Idealism-Rationalism to Pragmatism-Materialism: Shift in Understanding Religion to Islamic Society in East Java, Indonesia." In 2018 3rd International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering (ICESAME 2018). Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/amca-18.2018.190.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Pragmatic rationality' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography