Academic literature on the topic 'Praise and blame'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Praise and blame.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Praise and blame"
Byrne, Peter. "Praise and Blame." Faith and Philosophy 22, no. 4 (2005): 503–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/faithphil200522463.
Full textLouis, Sarah. "Praise or blame?" 5 to 7 Educator 2006, no. 18 (June 2006): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ftse.2006.5.6.21000.
Full textHouston, Barbara. "In Praise of Blame." Hypatia 7, no. 4 (1992): 128–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00722.x.
Full textMorris, Rick. "Praise, blame, and demandingness." Philosophical Studies 174, no. 7 (November 30, 2016): 1857–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0834-9.
Full textRobinson, Daniel N. "Summary of Praise and Blame." Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 23, no. 1 (2003): 2–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0091223.
Full textBradley, Gerard V. "Praise and Blame and Robinson." Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 23, no. 1 (2003): 8–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0091224.
Full textAnolli, Luigi, Rita Ciceri, and Maria Giaele Infantino. "From "blame by praise" to "praise by blame": Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication." International Journal of Psychology 37, no. 5 (October 2002): 266–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207590244000106.
Full textDennehy, Raymond. "In Praise of Blame—George Sher." International Philosophical Quarterly 47, no. 1 (2007): 125–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ipq200747168.
Full textErnst, Stefanie. "From Blame Gossip to Praise Gossip?" European Journal of Women's Studies 10, no. 3 (August 2003): 277–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350506803010003003.
Full textMalle, Bertram. "Intentionality, Morality, and Their Relationship in Human Judgment." Journal of Cognition and Culture 6, no. 1-2 (2006): 87–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853706776931358.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Praise and blame"
Levy, David Foster. "Socrates' Praise and Blame of Eros." Thesis, Boston College, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/2219.
Full textIt is only in "erotic matters" that Plato's Socrates is wise, or so he claims at least on several occasions, and since his Socrates makes this claim, it is necessary for Plato's readers to investigate the content of Socrates' wisdom about eros. This dissertation undertakes such an investigation. Plato does not, however, make Socrates' view of eros easy to grasp. So diverse are Socrates' treatments of eros in different dialogues and even within the same dialogue that doubt may arise as to whether he has a consistent view of eros; Socrates subjects eros to relentless criticism throughout the Republic and his first speech in the Phaedrus, and then offers eros his highest praise in his second speech in the Phaedrus and a somewhat lesser praise in the Symposium. This dissertation takes the question of why Socrates treats eros in such divergent ways as its guiding thread and offers an account of the ambiguity in eros' character that renders it both blameworthy and praiseworthy in Socrates' estimation. The investigation is primarily of eros in its ordinary sense of romantic love for another human being, for Socrates' most extensive discussions of eros, those of the Phaedrus and Symposium, are primarily about romantic love. Furthermore, as this investigation makes clear, despite his references to other kinds of eros, Socrates distinguishes a precise meaning of eros, according to which eros is always love of another human being. Socrates' view of romantic love is then assessed through studies of the Republic, Phaedrus, and Symposium. These studies present a unified Socratic understanding of eros; despite their apparent differences, Socrates' treatment of eros in each dialogue confirms and supplements that of the others, each providing further insight into Socrates' complete view. In the Republic, Socrates' opposition to eros, as displayed in both his discussion of the communism of the family in book five and his account of the tyrannic soul in book nine, is traced to irrational religious beliefs to which he suggests eros is connected. Socrates then explains this connection by presenting romantic love as a source of such beliefs in the Phaedrus and Symposium. Because eros is such a source, this dissertation argues that philosophy is incompatible with eros in its precise sense, as Socrates subtly indicates even within his laudatory treatments of eros in the Phaedrus and Symposium. Thus, as a source of irrational beliefs, eros is blameworthy. Yet eros is also praiseworthy. Despite his indication that the philosopher would be free of eros in the precise sense, Socrates also argues that the experience of eros can be of great benefit in the education of a potential philosopher. Precisely as a source of irrational religious belief, the erotic experience includes a greater awareness of the longing for immortality and hence the concern with mortality that Socrates believes is characteristic of human beings, and by bringing lovers to a greater awareness of this concern, eros provides a first step towards the self-knowledge characteristic of the philosophic life
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2010
Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: Political Science
Cook, Kate. "Praise, blame and identity construction in Greek Tragedy." Thesis, University of Reading, 2016. http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/67678/.
Full textPetersen, Jerry Lamar. "Praise, blame, and oracle the rhetorical tropes of political economy /." Pullman, Wash. : Washington State University, 2010. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Dissertations/Spring2010/j_petersen_042110.pdf.
Full textMattson, Jessica Nicole. "Praise and Blame: The Rhetorical Impact of Nineteenth-Century Conduct Manuals." TopSCHOLAR®, 2010. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/204.
Full textAli, Arden. "Acting from character : how virtue and vice explain praise and blame." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107097.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 87-95).
This dissertation offers a theory of praise and blame: praiseworthy acts manifest virtue and blameworthy acts are incompatible with virtue. Despite its simplicity, proposals like mine have been largely ignored. After all, don't good people sometimes deserve blame, and bad people sometimes deserve praise? I believe the significance of this thought has been exaggerated. The chapters of this dissertation argue that we should understand praiseworthiness and blameworthiness by appeal to the concept of virtue, even granting the possibility of uncharacteristic behaviour. Chapter One argues against the popular view of praiseworthiness, according to which acting well requires only that the agent is moved by the right reasons and acts rightly. At its most plausible, I claim, this view employs a concept of 'acting for the right reasons' that can only be understood in relation to virtue, e.g. someone acts for the right reasons just in case she is momentarily disposed as virtue requires, or has a disposition that approximates virtue. Praiseworthy acts are manifestations of virtue, perhaps qualified in some way, but nonetheless only intelligible in virtue-theoretic terms. Chapter Two builds an account of blameworthiness. In response to puzzling cases of excuse, I distinguishfull and infallible virtue. Roughly put: full virtue requires the disposition to act well; infallible virtue involves perfect compliance with the requirements of morality. This distinction allows us to articulate the relationship between character and culpability: blameworthy acts are those incompatible with full virtue in my sense. Chapter Three addresses a conflict between my view and one dogma in the philosophy of responsibility. Philosophers usually distinguish mere badness and blameworthiness thusly: bad actions reflect deficiencies in one's ethical character but do not warrant resentment or indignation; blameworthy actions call for these attitudes. But I argue there is no privileged part of our psychology that can serve the role of 'ethical character' as it appears in the proposal. A better view falls out of the second chapter. On my view, there are two kinds of wrongdoing: those incompatible with full virtue, and those merely incompatible with infallible virtue. The former are blameworthy, but the latter are merely bad.
by Arden Ali.
Ph. D.
Church, Elizabeth L. "Epideictic Without the Praise: A Heuristic Analysis for Rhetoric of Blame." Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1277144363.
Full textAnton, Audrey Lauren. "Sources and Reasons: Moral Responsibility and the Desert of Praise and Blame." The Ohio State University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306299866.
Full textRobinson, Katherine Reilly. "Negotiating Identity: Culturally Situated Epideictic in the Victorian Travel Narratives of Isabella Bird." Diss., CLICK HERE for online access, 2009. http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/ETD/image/etd3213.pdf.
Full textGaudin, Hélène. "Le remaniement de l'éloge dans la seconde édition des Vies de Giorgio Vasari." Paris 3, 2007. http://www.theses.fr/2007PA030159.
Full textThe context of Giorgio Vasari’s writing changed when he added references to his contemporaries in the second edition of the Vite. Professionally, his situation was not the same either – he was now officially working for Cosimo I de’ Medici. In 1568 what in 1550 had been a collection of the lives of illustrious men also became a history of the present. The use of praise and blame was affected by the new perspective in which the book was to be read. Far from being the unreserved admirer he has often been described as, Vasari chose to present himself as an impartial historian in order to be more effective in distributing blame. Historical biography, a genre inherited from Paolo Giovio, which Vasari reshaped and used in the context of art, gives the text of the Vite its distinctiveness, in which the author builds the rhetorical tools needed to make severe judgments, including on the artistic life of his day
Ben, Mansour Mohamed. "Le poète et le Prince : couleurs de l'éloge et du blâme à l'époque abbasside (750 - 965)." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSEN086.
Full textBased on one of the richest periods in the history of Islam in terms of poetic creativity and production, our project seeks to revise the forms that characterized the relationship between the poet and the prince. To elucidate this relationship as complex as it is protean, we will call on a rich and varied corpus, and then examine the question of praise and blame through three prisms: rhetoric, ethics and politics. The encomiastic discourse uses rhetoric to gain an audience’s support for a matter that is not yet established. But the effort required by the orator to convince the audience necessitates the ethical backdrop and common system of values, from which he proceeds to persuade. As for the political dimension, it is reflected in the poet’s function as the “verbal arm” serving the prince and as an instrument legitimizing his political position against real or potential opponents. Beyond the function of official panegyrist, the performativity of political discourse also extends to speech, education, reform, even open criticism that could evoke the antique parrêsia. By virtue of its sapiential substance, poetry contributes to the process forming the politician and offers him an excellent manual to government. As for the dissenting vein, invective, caricature and the mobilization of polemical speech constitute his main resources. The dissenting vein passes through the poet’s gaze on the universe of the court, the prince’s politics and the relationship between governor/governed. Whether it involves nominations, political projects or the very ethos of the man of power, the poet is always present to give his opinion. The injustice of a decision made by a judge, the nepotism of a governor or the harshness of a general are all aspects that demonstrate the poet’s vivacious criticism of power, and the role that the latter assumes as the moralizer of this sphere. The counsel is then presented as a means to rectify the prince’s general decisions or orientations and attests to the existence of a veritable poetic rationality. Furthermore, the rhetoric of praise and blame indicates the existence of a poetic rationality that reached maturity in the Abbasid period and attained an unprecedented degree of oratory efficiency, due to the poet’s growing consciousness of the necessity to be involved in political life and to influence the course of history
Books on the topic "Praise and blame"
Praise and blame in Roman republican rhetoric. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2011.
Find full textPraise and blame: Moral realism and its application. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Find full textRobinson, Daniel N. Praise and blame: Moral realism and its application. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Find full text1925-, Wang Guozhang, Liu Jin 1922-, Zhang Wei, and Starr Don, eds. Han yu bao bian yi ci yu yong fa ci dian =: A dictionary of Chinese praise and blame words, with Chinese-English parallel text. Beijing: Hua yu jiao xue chu ban she, 2001.
Find full textJewcentricity: Why Jews are praised, blamed, and used to explain just about everything. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.
Find full textThe women of Ben Jonson's poetry: Female representations in the non-dramatic verse. Aldershot, England: Scolar Press, 1995.
Find full textMoral Responsibility and Desert of Praise and Blame. Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2015.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Praise and blame"
Soeters, Joseph, and Ad van Iterson. "2. Blame and praise gossip in organizations." In The Civilized Organization, 25–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aios.10.04soe.
Full textLevy, David. "The Phaedrus’s Praise and Blame of Eros." In Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy, 55–111. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137342713_3.
Full textPillai, Krishna. "“Praise Loudly, Blame Softly”: The Art of Motivation." In Essence of a Manager, 125–43. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17581-7_8.
Full textMcNamara, Paul. "Praise, Blame, Obligation, and Beyond: Toward a Framework for Classical Supererogation and Kin." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 233–47. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70525-3_18.
Full textSvensson, Jonas. "ITZ BIDAH BRO!!!!! GT ME?? – YouTube Mawlid and Voices of Praise and Blame." In Muslims and the New Information and Communication Technologies, 89–111. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7247-2_6.
Full textBuche, Lars. "Blaue Ozeane auch in grauen Bergen?" In Die Blue-Ocean-Strategie in Theorie und Praxis, 227–38. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15480-6_16.
Full textHeupel, Thomas, and Gero Hoch. "Blaue Ozeane als strategisches Ziel: Risiko oder Chance für den Mittelstand?" In Die Blue-Ocean-Strategie in Theorie und Praxis, 105–22. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15480-6_7.
Full textHunt, Tony. "Praise and Blame." In Villon's Last Will, 34–49. Oxford University Press, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159148.003.0003.
Full textBenner, Erica. "Praise and blame." In Machiavelli's Prince, 178–84. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653638.003.0016.
Full textMason, Elinor. "Praise and Blame." In Ways to be Blameworthy, 100–126. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833604.003.0005.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Praise and blame"
Williams, Richard, Grant Ingram, and David Gregory-Smith. "Large Tip Clearance Flows in Two Compressor Cascades." In ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2010-22952.
Full textPauer, Reinhard, and Norbert Mu¨ller. "Impeller Design for Radial and Mixed Flow Compressors." In ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2004-61926.
Full textLejon, Marcus, Tomas Grönstedt, Niklas Andersson, Lars Ellbrant, and Hans Mårtensson. "On Improving the Surge Margin of a Tip-Critical Axial Compressor Rotor." In ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2017-64533.
Full textKolovratnik, Michal, and Gukchol Jun. "Improvements of Experimental Research of Wet Steam in Turbines Using CFD Simulations." In ASME Turbo Expo 2020: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2020-15018.
Full text