Relevant bibliographies by topics / Prejudice; Social psychology

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Prejudice; Social psychology'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 5 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Prejudice; Social psychology.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Prejudice; Social psychology"

1

MORINAGA, YASUKO, KEN-ICHI OHBUCHI, TOMOKO IKEGAMI, FUMIAKI TAKA, TOSHIO YOSHIDA, and TSUGUYUKI IZUMI. "Social Psychology of Prejudice:." Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan 59 (March 30, 2020): 304–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5926/arepj.59.304.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Campbell, Catherine, and Rupert Brown. "Prejudice: Its Social Psychology." British Journal of Sociology 48, no. 2 (June 1997): 322. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591756.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Duckitt, John. "Prejudice: its social psychology." Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 35, no. 2 (June 6, 2013): 196–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.803723.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Schaller, Mark, and Steven L. Neuberg. "Beyond prejudice to prejudices." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35, no. 6 (November 20, 2012): 445–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12001306.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractDifferent groups, because they are perceived to pose different threats, elicit different prejudices. Collective action by disadvantaged groups can amplify the perception of specific threats, with predictable and potentially counterproductive consequences. It is important to carefully consider the threat-based psychology of prejudice(s) before implementing any strategy intended to promote positive social change.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Crawford, Jarret T., and Mark J. Brandt. "Who Is Prejudiced, and Toward Whom? The Big Five Traits and Generalized Prejudice." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 45, no. 10 (March 21, 2019): 1455–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167219832335.

Full text
Abstract:
Meta-analyses show that low levels of Openness and Agreeableness correlate with generalized prejudice. However, previous studies narrowly assessed prejudice toward low-status, disadvantaged groups. Using a broad operationalization of generalized prejudice toward a heterogeneous array of targets, we sought to answer two questions: (a) Are some types of people prejudiced against most types of groups? and (b) Are some types of people prejudiced against certain types of groups? Across four samples ( N = 7,543), Openness was very weakly related to broad generalized prejudice, r = −.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) [−.07, −.001], whereas low Agreeableness was reliably associated with broad generalized prejudice, r = −.23, 95% CI [−.31, −.16]. When target characteristics moderated relationships between Big Five traits and prejudice, they implied that perceiver–target dissimilarity on personality traits explains prejudice. Importantly, the relationship between Agreeableness and prejudice remained robust across target groups, suggesting it is the personality trait orienting people toward (dis)liking of others.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Balkwell, James W., and John Duckitt. "The Social Psychology of Prejudice." Contemporary Sociology 23, no. 1 (January 1994): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2074930.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cramer, M. Richard, and Douglas W. Bethlehem. "A Social Psychology of Prejudice." Contemporary Sociology 16, no. 4 (July 1987): 465. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069869.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Todosijevic, Bojan. "Authoritarian personality: Psychoanalysis of antisemitism and prejudices." Psihologija 41, no. 2 (2008): 123–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/psi0802123t.

Full text
Abstract:
The Authoritarian Personality is one of the most influential studies in social psychology, yet it has been subjected to different, often contradictory interpretations. This paper argues that the most important element of the authoritarian personality theory is the analysis of the psychological functionality of prejudice. Using psychoanalytic conceptual tools, the authors described the psychological logic behind apparently contradictory prejudices, and the function of prejudice in personal psychological 'economy'. In this way, Adorno et al. 'psychoanalyzed' both prejudice and the prejudiced. The first part of the paper presents the original research, with the particular focus on the less familiar aspects. The second part reviews the reactions to the Authoritarian Personality, and analyzes some of the better known criticisms and objections. The paper ends with the review of recent research trends inspired by Adorno et al.?s theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Amodio, David M., and Mina Cikara. "The Social Neuroscience of Prejudice." Annual Review of Psychology 72, no. 1 (January 4, 2021): 439–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050928.

Full text
Abstract:
The social neuroscience approach to prejudice investigates the psychology of intergroup bias by integrating models and methods of neuroscience with the social psychology of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Here, we review major contemporary lines of inquiry, including current accounts of group-based categorization; formation and updating of prejudice and stereotypes; effects of prejudice on perception, emotion, and decision making; and the self-regulation of prejudice. In each section, we discuss key social neuroscience findings, consider interpretational challenges and connections with the behavioral literature, and highlight how they advance psychological theories of prejudice. We conclude by discussing the next-generation questions that will continue to guide the social neuroscience approach toward addressing major societal issues of prejudice and discrimination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cantal, Clara, Taciano L. Milfont, Marc S. Wilson, and Valdiney V. Gouveia. "Differential Effects of Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice in Brazil." European Journal of Personality 29, no. 1 (January 2015): 17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1978.

Full text
Abstract:
Previous research within a dual–process cognitive–motivational theory of ideology and prejudice has indicated that dimensions of generalized prejudice are structured around attitudes towards dangerous, derogated and dissident groups, and that these prejudice dimensions are differentially predicted by the ideological attitudes of Right–Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). However, to date, these findings have been restricted to New Zealand samples. We describe two studies examining whether the structure of prejudiced attitudes and the differential prediction by RWA and SDO replicate in the Brazilian context, incorporating context–relevant examples of each group—politicians, those from the northeast region of Brazil, and environmentalists. Results broadly supported the three–factor structure of dangerous, derogated, and dissident groups. Consistent with previous research, regression and structural equation analyses showed that RWA explained prejudice against dangerous groups, SDO explained prejudice against derogated groups, and both RWA and SDO explained prejudice against dissident groups. This research provides some evidence for the generalizability of the three–dimensional structure of generalized prejudice and differential prediction by RWA and SDO. Copyright © 2014 European Association of Personality Psychology
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Prejudice; Social psychology"

1

Akrami, Nazar. "Prejudice: The Interplay of Personality, Cognition, and Social Psychology." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Psychology, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-5785.

Full text
Abstract:

Three main theoretical approaches to the study of the causation of prejudice can be distinguished within psychological research. The cognitive approach suggests that prejudice is a function of cognitive processes where stereotypic information about social groups, stored in memory, is automatically activated and affects people’s judgements and behavior toward members of the target group. The personality approach suggests that prejudice is a function of people’s personality characteristics. Finally, the social psychological approach emphasizes people’s group membership and group identification as the as major source of causation.

Previous research has almost entirely focused on only one approach of causation at a time. The focus has also shifted periodically – with attention paid to one approach at each period of time. The present thesis is an attempt to integrate these approaches and suggests an integrative model where the relative contribution of each approach could be assessed. The underlying assumption is that all three approaches are meaningful and that prejudice is a complex phenomenon that is best explained by taking into account all approaches jointly.

Examining the cognitive approach, Paper I revealed that people are knowledgeable of the cultural stereotypes and that stereotypic information is automatically activated and affects people’s judgments. Paper II (and Paper III) supported the personality approach and revealed that prejudice is highly related to primary personality characteristics and, in line with a central idea in this approach, different types of prejudice (ethnic prejudice, sexism, homophobia, and prejudice toward disabled people) are highly correlated. The results of Paper III revealed the importance of group membership and group identification, supporting the social psychology approach.

The findings are discussed in relation to previous research and the necessity to integrate various approaches and disciplines to explain psychological phenomena in general and prejudice in particular. Also, implications of the findings for prejudice prevention are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Snellman, Alexandra. "Social Hierarchies, Prejudice, and Discrimination." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis ; Uppsala universitet, 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8282.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ryan, John Patrick. "Thinking, Feeling and Discriminating: The Role of Prejudice as a Mediator between Stereotypes and Discrimination." unrestricted, 2006. http://etd.gsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07212006-164828/.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.A.)--Georgia State University, 2006.
Title from title screen. Eric Vanman, committee chair; David Washburn, Tracie Stewart, committee members. Electronic text (64 p.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed June 13, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 32-43).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Vial, Vazquez Andrea Celeste. "A Role-Based Theory of Prejudice Accommodation." Thesis, Yale University, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10957350.

Full text
Abstract:

This dissertation developed and tested a role-based framework drawing from role theory to understand how external factors contribute to the spread of bias in organizations. Using experimental social psychological methods, the twelve studies in this dissertation investigated why other people's prejudices can sometimes influence individuals' decisions and behaviors due to the demands of the decision maker role. Role theory posits that there are certain expectations associated with specific roles, and the roles that people occupy can determine their attitudes and behaviors. Across studies, participants placed in a decision-making role in charge of hiring selections accommodated the prejudices of relevant third parties in their decisions (i.e., the "third-party prejudice effect''). Specifically, consistent with the proposed model, in the studies described in Chapter 2, individuals in charge of selection decisions were significantly less likely to select a woman when a relevant third party was prejudiced against women. Chapter 3 extended this inquiry to novel, fictional groups, generalizing the third-party prejudice effect beyond the context of gender bias.

According to a role-based framework, concerns relevant to the decision maker role become highly salient in contexts of third-party prejudice, motivating those in charge of hiring selections to accommodate this prejudice in order to accomplish role-relevant goals. In particular, in the context of hiring selections, decision makers accommodate third-party prejudice without coercion because they engage in two types of considerations, focused (a) on maximizing performance (i.e.. task-focused concerns). and (b) on avoiding conflict or facilitating relations among the parties involved (i.e., interpersonal concerns). These task-focused and interpersonal concerns are relevant to the decision maker role and reflect well-established distinctions between instrumental and socioemotional dimensions of group processes. This proposed mechanism was experimentally supported. revealing that task-focused and interpersonal concerns significantly mediated the effect both in the context of gender prejudice (Chapter 2) as well as in a novel groups context (Chapter 3). Furthermore, in Chapter 2, experimentally reducing role-relevant concerns by manipulating task-focused considerations significantly reduced the accommodation of third-party prejudice against women.

In line with the notion that roles impact behavior above and beyond individual-level attitudes and beliefs, participants in two studies accommodated prejudice against women in their selections regardless of their personal endorsement of modern sexism and traditional gender stereotypes (Chapter 2). Participants similarly accommodated third-party prejudice against groups about which they knew very little, in contexts in which pre-existing biases or the endorsement of cultural stereotypes had little bearing on their selections (Chapter 3). Moreover, consistent with the proposition that roles shape behavior more strongly than social identity, participants across studies accommodated third-party prejudice in their decisions even when such prejudice was directed toward a social category in-group. A role-based framework can illuminate the institutional factors that produce social disparities, and can contribute to a growing understanding of the reasons why members of underrepresented groups sometimes appear to treat each other poorly in organizational contexts.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Graves, Ellington T. "Differential perceptions of prejudice : an analysis of social attribution /." Thesis, This resource online, 1992. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12232009-020530/.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nicolas, Gandalf. "Confrontation of Prejudice Towards Multiracials and Monoracials." W&M ScholarWorks, 2015. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539626809.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Terry, Lisa Noelle. "Exploring potential components of prejudice toward certain stigmatized others." Access restricted to users with UT Austin EID Full text (PDF) from UMI/Dissertation Abstracts International, 2001. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/utexas/fullcit?p3035988.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bays, Annalucia. "The Justification of Prejudice Toward Childfree Women." VCU Scholars Compass, 2017. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5153.

Full text
Abstract:
Previous research suggests that women without children are perceived negatively by others and experience adverse outcomes in various settings. This study investigated psychosocial justifications of prejudice toward childfree women. Participants (N = 891) completed measures of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), the internal (IMS-S) and external (EMS-S) motivations to respond without sexism, and prejudice toward childfree women (i.e., perceived disadvantages of being childfree, evaluations of childfree women, and perceptions of childfree women’s warmth). Most participants also completed one or more justification measures of hostile sexism (HS), benevolent sexism (BS), gender-specific system justification (GSSJ), and femininity ideology. Results indicated that greater RWA was directly associated with greater perceived childfree disadvantages and coldness in childfree women. Additionally, greater IMS-S was directly associated with fewer perceived disadvantages, favorable evaluations, and greater perceived warmth; and greater EMS-S was directly associated with more negative evaluations and perceived coldness. Greater BS and GSSJ were also associated with greater disadvantages. Furthermore, femininity ideology was directly associated with greater disadvantages, unfavorable evaluations, and perceived coldness. In mediational analyses, IMS-S and EMS-S were associated with greater disadvantages, unfavorable evaluations, and perceived coldness indirectly through femininity ideology. EMS-S was also associated with greater disadvantages and unfavorable evaluations indirectly through BS. This study makes a unique contribution to the literature on attitudes toward childfree women by not only replicating that childfree prejudice persists, but also documenting why it potentially exists. Additionally, by identifying several psychosocial constructs that may justify childfree prejudice, this study suggests future research and possible interventions to reduce childfree prejudice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sabet-Esfahani, Shahrzad. "Prejudice and Protectionism: Essays at the Intersection of International Political Economy and Psychology." Thesis, Harvard University, 2014. http://dissertations.umi.com/gsas.harvard:11687.

Full text
Abstract:
What explains public opinion toward economic globalization, and specifically, toward international trade? A wave of recent scholarship has shown that symbolic and identity-based factors--individual predispositions such as ethnocentrism, nationalism, prejudice, and cosmopolitanism--are highly correlated with attitudes toward trade. The nature of the relationship between symbolic attitudes and trade opinion, however, remains conspicuously unclear. This dissertation combines fresh empirical strategies with the theoretical tools of both economics and psychology to illuminate the role and effect of non-material factors in the formation of public opinion toward international trade. I present a new theoretical framework for the study of individual preferences in international political economy, and test the empirical implications of the theory using observational data, an original survey experiment, and systematic analysis of open-ended survey responses. Specifically, I show: (1) that symbolic attitudes such a prejudice have a causal effect on trade preferences, independent of economic considerations; (2) that the effect of economic self-interest on trade preferences is contingent upon the strength of symbolic attitudes; and (3) that the trade preferences of cosmopolitan individuals are susceptible to the effect of subjective beliefs about the impact of trade on foreigners, providing the first evidence of foreign-regarding motivations in the context of trade opinion.
Government
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hedge, Annie. "Talk about discrimination : an analysis of the language we use to talk about equal opportunities." Thesis, Birkbeck (University of London), 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.339218.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Prejudice; Social psychology"

1

Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Prejudice: Its social psychology. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell Pub., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bethlehem, Douglas. A social psychology of prejudice. London: Croom Helm, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

A social psychology of prejudice. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

The social psychology of prejudice. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

A social psychology of prejudice. London: Croom Helm, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Pelinka, Anton. Handbook of prejudice. Amherst, N.Y: Cambria Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Whitley, Bernard E. The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

E, Kite Mary, ed. The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Prejudice; Social psychology"

1

Gergen, Kenneth J., and Mary M. Gergen. "Prejudice and Discrimination." In Social Psychology, 122–57. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7866-6_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Nelson, Todd D. "Prejudice." In Getting Grounded in Social Psychology, 286–316. New York, NY : Routledge, [2017]: Psychology Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315171371-11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wittenbrink, Bernd, Joshua Correll, and Debbie S. Ma. "Implicit Prejudice." In Social Psychology in Action, 163–77. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Barone, David F., James E. Maddux, and C. R. Snyder. "Stereotyping and Prejudice." In Social Cognitive Psychology, 189–214. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5843-9_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gough, Brendan, Majella McFadden, and Matthew McDonald. "Prejudice in Practice." In Critical Social Psychology, 126–55. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07242-9_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tuffin, Keith. "Prejudice." In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology, 319–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cohrs, J. Christopher, and Thomas Kessler. "Negative Stereotypes, Prejudice and Discrimination." In Social Psychology of Social Problems, 3–29. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-27222-5_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Jaspal, Rusi. "Prejudice and Intergroup Relations." In The Social Psychology of Gay Men, 81–100. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27057-5_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Jackson, Lynne M. "Defining prejudice." In The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action (2nd ed.)., 9–25. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0000168-002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Crawford, Jarret T. "The Politics of the Psychology of Prejudice." In The Politics of Social Psychology, 99–115. NewYork, NY: Routledge, 2017. |: Psychology Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315112619-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Prejudice; Social psychology"

1

Devi, Nur A. M., and Lusy A. Akhrani. "Behind Front Pembela Islam (FPI) Movement: Can Social Value Orientation Influence Religious Prejudice?" In International Conference on Psychology in Health, Educational, Social, and Organizational Settings. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0008591905480553.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Karyanta, Nugraha Arif, and M. G. Bagus Ani Putra. "Prejudice towards Host Culture and Acculturative Stress: Studies on Internal Migrants in Indonesia." In International Conference on Psychology in Health, Educational, Social, and Organizational Settings. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0008588502940302.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Santi, Dyan Evita, Suryanto, and M. G. Bagus Ani Putra. "Ethnic Identity and Ethnic Prejudice in Children: A Comparative Study of the Three Cities in Indonesia." In International Conference on Psychology in Health, Educational, Social, and Organizational Settings. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0008587302070215.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Prejudice; Social psychology' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography