Relevant bibliographies by topics / Prerogative, Royal

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Prerogative, Royal'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Prerogative, Royal.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Prerogative, Royal"

1

Tyrer, S. P. "Royal Prerogative?" Psychiatric Bulletin 12, no. 8 (August 1, 1988): 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.12.8.340-a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tyrer, Stephen P. "Royal Prerogative?" Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists 12, no. 8 (August 1988): 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/s0140078900021131.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Poole, T. "United Kingdom: The royal prerogative." International Journal of Constitutional Law 8, no. 1 (January 1, 2010): 146–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop038.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cox*, Noel. "The Royal Prerogative in the Realms." Commonwealth Law Bulletin 33, no. 4 (December 2007): 611–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050710701814839.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ross, Nick. "Royal prerogative: having it both ways?" Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 106, no. 3 (March 2013): 79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076813479765.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lowe, William C. "George III, peerage creations and politics, 1760–1784." Historical Journal 35, no. 3 (September 1992): 587–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x0002598x.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article looks at the political role of the royal prerogative to create and promote British peers in the period 1760–1784. It argues that during the first two decades of his reign George III maintained his original intention that peerage creations should befew in number and isolated from short-term political influences, but that during the prolonged political crisis that unfolded at the end of the American War of Independence, the king's power to create peers became deeply embroiled in politics. Not only were all eight of the peerages created in 1782–1783 influenced by political considerations, this aspect of the royal prerogative became itself the topic of parliamentary discussion. It was in this context of recent creations and heightened interest in the royal prerogative that George III's refusal to make peers proved to be an effective tactic in his struggle with the Fox-North coalition. Especially damaging was the coalition's inability to secure Lord North's promotion to the upper house. Once the coalition had been dismissed, George HI used his prerogative in an overtly political fashion to strengthen the younger Pitt in both houses of parliament.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cox, Noel. "THE GRADUAL CURTAILMENT OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE." Denning Law Journal 24, no. 1 (November 27, 2012): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/dlj.v24i1.389.

Full text
Abstract:
In the United Kingdom and those countries that recognise Elizabeth II as their Queen,1 there are to be found certain fundamental constitutional principles. One of these is that much of the legal basis of executive power derives from the Crown,2 though this has, in the past, often been downplayed for political and other reasons. Indeed, in the Commonwealth as a whole, political independence has often been equated with the reduction of the role of the Crown to a position of subservience to the political executive.3 What remains important is the position of the Crown as an organising principle of government (the framework upon which the structure of government is built4), as a source of legitimacy, and as a symbol for permanent government. Executive power, therefore, remains based on the royal prerogative, and the „third source‟ of authority (the legal powers of the legal natural person, as the Crown is a corporation aggregate), as well as upon statute law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Christian, T. J., and K. D. Ewing. "Judicial Review of the Royal Prerogative in Canada." Cambridge Law Journal 45, no. 2 (July 1986): 173–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300120768.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Freedman, Eric M., and Christopher N. May. "Presidential Defiance of "Unconstitutional" Laws: Reviving the Royal Prerogative." American Journal of Legal History 44, no. 2 (April 2000): 226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/846124.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Enright, Michael J. "Royal succession and abbatial prerogative in Adomnán’s Vita Columbae." Peritia 4 (January 1985): 83–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/j.peri.3.98.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Prerogative, Royal"

1

Kelly, Margaret Rose Louise Leckie. "King and Crown an examination of the legal foundation of the British king /." Phd thesis, Australia : Macquarie University, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/71499.

Full text
Abstract:
"27 October 1998"
Thesis (PhD)--Macquarie University, School of Law, 1999.
Bibliography: p. 509-550.
Thesis -- Appendices.
'The Crown' has been described as a 'term of art' in constitutional law. This is more than misleading, obscuring the pivotal legal position of the king, which in modern times has been conveniently ignored by lawyers and politicians alike. -- This work examines the legal processes by which a king is made, tracing those processes from the earliest times to the present day. It concludes that the king is made by the selection and recognition by the people, his taking of the Oath of Governance, and his subsequent anointing. (The religious aspects of the making of the king, though of considerable legal significance, are not examined herein, because of space constraints.) -- The Oath of Governance is conventionally called the 'Coronation Oath'-which terminology, while correctly categorising the Oath by reference to the occasion on which it is usually taken, has led by subliminal implication to an erroneous conclusion by many modern commentators that the Oath is merely ceremonial. -- This work highlights the legal implications of the king's Oath of Governance throughout history, particularly in times of political unrest, and concludes that the Oath legally :- conveys power from the people to the person about to become king (the willingness of the people so to confer the power having been evidenced in their collective recognition of that person); - bestows all the prerogatives of the office of king upon that person; - enshrines the manner in which those prerogatives are to be exercised by the king in his people(s)' governance; and that therefore the Oath of Governance is the foundation of the British Constitution. -- All power and prerogative lie with the king, who as a result of his Oath of Governance is sworn to maintain the peace and protection of his people(s), and the king can not, in conscience or law, either do, or allow, anything that is in opposition to the terms of that Oath.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
xxvii, 818 p
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mortimer, Brenda Gean. "Rethinking penal reform and the Royal Prerogative of mercy during Robert Peel's stewardship of the Home Office 1822-7, 1828-30." Thesis, University of Leicester, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39954.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis is the first to undertake an extensive study of the petitions for the Royal Prerogative of mercy submitted to Robert Peel during his stewardship of the Home Office between 1822-7 and 1828-30. It analyses the separate functions Peel was obliged to discharge as legislator, member of the Executive and servant of the Crown. Against the background of the criminal justice system in place in 1822, it explores the underlying legal, jurisprudential and constitutional issues which constrained Peel’s decision- making and identifies the nature and extent of the conventions which evolved to curtail the personal discretion of the Monarch. It focuses on the challenges faced by Peel in reforming the maze of statutes, common law and custom, the main sources of English Law, and demonstrates that criminal law reform, in this period, was conducted incrementally in a continuum with consensus of both Tories and Whigs. It also stresses the importance of using accurate legal language in order to distinguish the common place meaning of mercy from the exercise of the Royal Prerogative of mercy with its constitutional constraints, and suggests that this is a pre-requisite for an accurate appraisal of Peel’s stewardship. Based on research of more than 5,000 cases, it reconstructs the process of begging for mercy and shows that, whilst there were no formalities for the petitions, the Home Office’s responses were increasing standardised and bureaucratic. The conclusions reached will demonstrate that Peel’s penal reforms and his recommendations for the exercise of the Royal Prerogative of mercy were key landmarks in the transition from a parochial system with capital punishment at its heart to a more centralised system based on secondary punishments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

KISER, EDGAR VANCE. "KINGS AND CLASSES: CROWN AUTONOMY, STATE POLICIES, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN WESTERN EUROPEAN ABSOLUTISMS (ENGLAND, FRANCE, SWEDEN, SPAIN)." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/184073.

Full text
Abstract:
This dissertation explores the role of Absolutist states in the transition from feudalism to capitalism in Western Europe. Three general questions are addressed: (1) what are the determinants of variations in the autonomy of rulers? (2) what are the consequences of variations in autonomy for states policies? and (3) what are the effects of various state policies on economic development? A new theoretical framework, based on a synthesis of the neoclassical economic literature on principal-agent relations and current organizational theory in sociology, is developed to answer these three questions. Case studies of Absolutism in England, France, Sweden, and Spain are used to illustrate the explanatory power of the theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Birdling, Malcolm David. "Correction of miscarriages of justice in New Zealand and England." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2012. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2dae4513-4fd2-40cd-bb6a-dbba696d6d7f.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis sets out to provide a deep analysis of the mechanisms for review of convictions in New Zealand and England after initial appeal rights are exhausted, and to identify the key areas of similarity and difference between these systems, the reasons for these differences, and their implications. The appeal systems in each jurisdiction are briefly examined, alongside the pressures and restrictions on their functioning. Particular attention is paid to the options for appeal out of time, and for revisiting appeal decisions if new material comes to light. The main discussion is of the specialist procedures for review of suspect convictions in each jurisdiction: the Royal Prerogative of Mercy process carried out by the New Zealand Ministry of Justice and the work of the English Criminal Cases Review Commission. This discussion presents the results of empirical research carried out by the author utilising the files of each of these bodies. It investigates the legal context in which each body functions, and provides an account of how each body functions in practice, by examining the circumstances in which each body will contemplate referring a matter back to an appeal court and the means by which a determination is made as to whether to do so in an individual case. In addition it examines the various factors (legal and non-legal) which impact on their work. Finally, the key features of the two systems are contrasted, with a discussion of the areas of similarity and difference, as well as the possible implications of these, in particular for reform of the New Zealand processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Del, Popolo Martina. "Il patrimonio reginale di Isabella di Castiglia. Le signorie urbane di Sicilia e Catalogna (1470-1504)." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/671877.

Full text
Abstract:
La tesi ricostruisce le signorie urbane concesse nel 1470 a Isabella di Castiglia in Sicilia e Catalogna, in quanto regina consorte d'Aragona, ovvero Siracusa, Lentini, Francavilla, Mineo, Vizzini, San Filippo, Tàrrega, Vilagrassa e Sabadell. Questo patrimonio era una base di potere molto importante per corroborare il suo status, retribuire i suoi ufficiali e aumentare il prestigio del suo entourage. La ricerca analizza l'amministrazione politica ed economica della signoria reginale, soprattutto le prerogative che la sovrana esercitava su questa giurisdizione e i diritti mantenuti dal re e dai municipi. La tesi delinea le differenti forme in cui si è impiantato il gruppo di ufficiali e le diverse strategie di promozione sociale perseguite dalle classi dirigenti locali. In ultima istanza, il volume presenta la trascrizione dei privilegi ufficiali di donazione e di un registro conservato nell'Archivio della Corona d'Aragona, dato che al giorno d'oggi è l'unico proveniente dalla cancelleria propria della regina.
The thesis reconstructs the urban manor of Sicily and Catalonia granted in 1470 to Isabel de Castilla as queen consort of Aragon, that is Siracusa, Lentini, Francavilla, Mineo, Vizzini, San Filippo, Tàrrega, Vilagrassa and Sabadell. This patrimony was a very important base of power to corroborate her status, reward her officers and increase the prestige of her entourage. The research analyzes the political and economic administration of the reginal manor, especially the rights the queen had in her jurisdiction and those maintained by the king and the municipalities. The thesis outlines the ways in which the class of officers has been implemented and the different social promotion strategies pursued by the local ruling classes. Finally, the book presents the transcription of the official charters of donation and of a record kept in the Archives of the Crown of Aragon, since today it is the only one made in the queen's chancery.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Glansdorff, Sophie. "Potentes saeculi: pouvoir séculier et royauté sous le règne de Louis le Germanique (826-876)." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/210872.

Full text
Abstract:
L’objet de cette thèse est d’étudier les relations entre Louis le Germanique et les aristocrates laïques, aussi bien ceux qui appartenaient à son propre royaume (de Bavière puis de Francie orientale), que ceux qui appartenaient aux autres royaumes issus du traité de Verdun (843). L’intérêt de cette recherche, qui s’inscrit dans le cadre d’un très récent renouveau d’intérêt pour le règne de Louis, est d’apporter un nouvel éclairage sur l’évolution politique de l’Empire carolingien central à tardif, en étudiant sa facette « orientale », souvent négligée par rapport à sa contrepartie « occidentale ».

Dans un contexte caractérisé par les rivalités et les conflits, il est évidemment vital pour le roi de s’assurer l’appui des grands et de les intégrer à son entourage. La première partie de ce travail a donc été consacrée à l’entourage du roi et à son évolution. Cet entourage a plus précisément été défini sur base du De Ordine Palatii d’Hincmar de Reims :il inclut d’abord les membres du Palais au sens étroit du terme (famille et détenteurs d’offices palatins – laïques en l’occurence -) ;ensuite l’ensemble des « grands » laïques du royaume, qui, sans détenir d’office au Palais, entretiennent une relation privilégiée avec le roi, soit qu’ils détiennent de lui un honor (les comtes), soit qu’ils appartiennent à ses vassaux ou à ses fideles. Au sein de cet ensemble de personnes, tous ne bénéficient cependant pas de la même « Königsnähe » ;par conséquent, en tenant compte de la nature des sources issues de Francie orientale (essentiellement les actes privés des abbayes et évêchés du royaume), il s’est avéré nécessaire de nuancer ce tableau en recherchant les personnalités qui font réellement preuve de la plus grande proximité avec le roi, sans être nécessairement pour autant les mieux documentés au niveau des sources.

De tous les membres (laïques) de cet entourage, les comtes sont apparus comme les plus importants, en raison de leur fonction même ;pour cette raison (et afin de rendre la consultation plus aisée et plus pratique pour qui s’intéresse aux comtes), une prosopographie a été constituée, incluant les comtes actifs en Bavière (826-887), Alémannie, Francie, Saxe, Thuringe (833-887) et Lotharingie orientale (870-887).

Si cette approche, essentiellement prosopographique, est intéressante en soi, elle ne permet néanmoins pas, en tant que telle, d’apprécier la teneur des relations entre roi et grands, ni de replacer celle-ci dans le cadre plus global de l’Empire carolingien. Pour ce faire, il est nécessaire d’y ajouter l’étude de certains éléments significatifs, qui permettent de dégager plus aisément continuités, ruptures et spécificités. A l’étude de l’évolution du fisc (et des spécificités des donations royales), s’est jointe celle des éléments représentatifs du pouvoir des aristocrates :possession de monastères privés, disposition de fortifications, transmission des offices comtaux. L’articulation de ces éléments avec le pouvoir royal révèle des spécificités très intéressantes, notamment au niveau du contrôle du roi sur les donations et honores accordés aux grands, le maintien de la révocabilité de ceux-ci étant visiblement souhaité ;s’il n’est pas toujours possible d’évaluer le rôle de la volonté royale dans cette évolution, il n’en va pas de même quand on étudie les divers actes d’infidélité, réels ou supposés, portés contre le roi. Les réactions royales, en la matière, semblent bien le signe d’une politique distincte et cohérente.

En conclusion, cette analyse se joint à l’approche prosopographique pour présenter une manière spécifique de concevoir, et d’aborder sur le plan pratique, les relations entre roi et grands. Sous certains aspects, ce règne se distingue nettement de celui de ses contemporains, et éclaire donc une autre facette de l’évolution de l’Empire carolingien postérieure au traité de Verdun, globalement (et provisoirement) plus maîtrisée qu’ailleurs ;celle-ci ne peut être ignorée et doit contribuer à nuancer l’image de l’évolution du pouvoir royal au IXème s.


Doctorat en philosophie et lettres, Orientation histoire
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dyson, Jessica. "Staging legal authority : ideas of law in Caroline drama." Thesis, University of Stirling, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/366.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis seeks to place drama of the Caroline commercial theatre in its contemporary political and legal context; particularly, it addresses the ways in which the struggle for supremacy between the royal prerogative, common law and local custom is constructed and negotiated in plays of the period. It argues that as the reign of Charles I progresses, the divine right and absolute power of the monarchy on stage begins to lose its authority, as playwrights, particularly Massinger and Brome, present a decline from divinity into the presentation of an arbitrary man who seeks to impose and increase his authority by enforcing obedience to selfish and wilful actions and demands. This decline from divinity, I argue, allows for the rise of a competing legitimate legal authority in the form of common law. Engaging with the contemporary discourse of custom, reason and law which pervades legal tracts of the period such as Coke’s Institutes and Reports and Davies’ ‘Preface Dedicatory’ to Le Primer Report des Cases & Matters en Ley resolues & adiudges en les Courts del Roy en Ireland, drama by Brome, Jonson, Massinger and Shirley presents arbitrary absolutism as madness, and adherence to customary common law as reason which restores order. In this climate, the drama suggests, royal manipulation of the law for personal ends, of which Charles I was often accused, destabilises law and legal authority. This destabilisation of legal authority is examined in a broader context in plays set in areas outwith London, geographically distant from central authority. The thesis places these plays in the context of Charles I’s attempts to centralise local law enforcement through such publications as the Book of Orders. When maintaining order in the provinces came into conflict with central legislation, the local officials exercised what Keith Wrightson describes as ‘two concepts of order’, turning a blind eye to certain activities when strict enforcement of law would create rather than dissolve local tensions. In both attempting to insist on unity between the centre and the provinces through tighter control of local officials, and dividing the centre from the provinces in the dissolution of Parliament, Charles’s government was, the plays suggest, in danger not only of destabilising and decentralising legal authority but of fragmenting it. This thesis argues that drama provides a medium whereby the politico-legal debates of the period may be presented to, and debated by, a wider audience than the more technical contemporary legal arguments, and, during Charles I’s personal rule, the theatre became a public forum for debate when Parliament was unavailable.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Saunier, Claire. "La doctrine des « questions politiques ». Étude comparée : Angleterre, France, États-Unis." Thesis, Paris 2, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA020034.

Full text
Abstract:
En tant que garant du respect des lois ou de la Constitution, le juge se trouve nécessairement confronté à des recours mettant en cause des décisions du pouvoir exécutif ou du pouvoir législatif. Certaines de ces décisions touchent à des sujets politiquement sensibles, parce qu'elles traduisent des choix discrétionnaires de la part de l'une et l’autre de ces deux branches. Face à cette situation délicate, le juge doit concilier deux impératifs potentiellement contradictoires. Il semble, d’une part, avoir l'obligation de trancher les litiges qui lui sont soumis, afin de concrétiser les exigences de l’État de droit (ou de la rule of law). D’autre part, il est tenu de respecter le principe fondamental de séparation des pouvoirs, lequel exige qu’il n’excède pas ses compétences. Ces deux impératifs étant communs à toutes les démocraties occidentales, le problème s'y est par conséquent posé. Pour y répondre, une solution similaire a pu être donnée par les jurisprudences de différents systèmes. Ces affaires ont donné lieu à la reconnaissance d'une catégorie particulière d'actes, dont l'immunité juridictionnelle constitue le caractère principal : les political questions aux États-Unis, les Acts of State mais également les actes émanant du pouvoir de prérogative royale en Angleterre et enfin, les actes de gouvernement et les actes parlementaires en France. En dépit des différences culturelles de ces systèmes juridiques, il est intéressant de voir que ces catégories jurisprudentielles regroupent des litiges aux objets similaires. En d’autres termes, la doctrine des “questions politiques” suggère qu’il existerait une matière politique distincte de la matière juridique. L’objectif de cette recherche sera d’interroger la pertinence de cette apparente dichotomie entre droit et politique, à travers une analyse du contentieux des « questions politiques » et des études doctrinales qui lui ont été consacrées
As guardians of the respect of the laws and the constitution, judges often have to face cases that question the legality of decisions from the highest executive authorities or from the legislator. Some of those issues are highly politically sensitive because they reflect discretionary choices made by those political authorities. In such delicate cases, judges have to reconcile two imperatives. On the one hand they have to provide a remedy to the claimants, in order to achieve the rule of law (or, the État de droit) and decide the case and, on the other hand, they have to respect the fundamental principle of the separation of powers which requires that they do not exceed their powers. Those two imperatives are central in western democracies, therefore this problem appears in various legal systems. A similar device has been elaborated in those different systems. French, American and English judges have indeed decided to isolate certain issues, which seemed to make them improper for judicial resolution. This judicial category can be designated by the term “political questions,” which is used in the American case law. This term also suits other categories found in the French case law, such as the “actes de gouvernement” and “actes parlementaires”, but also in the English case law, where judges refused to decide what they call “Acts of State” or some decisions based on the Royal Prerogative. In spite of the important cultural differences between those systems, it is interesting to see that those categories gather similar decisions. In other words, these “political questions” doctrine reflect the idea that political matters could be distinguished from legal matters. The whole point of this research will be to examine the significance of the dichotomy between law and politics, through the analysis of case law related to the “political questions” doctrine and the doctrinal approaches of this category
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Krug, Ilana Chaya. "Royal prerogative gone astray : the social and economic impact of purveyance of the English peasantry at the beginning the Hundred Years' War /." 2006. http://link.library.utoronto.ca/eir/EIRdetail.cfm?Resources__ID=442472&T=F.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Depelteau-Paquette, Marie. "Le pouvoir du premier ministre dans la nomination du haut personnel de l’État au Canada : vers un processus plus transparent et moins discrétionnaire, comme en Grande-Bretagne ?" Thèse, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/7119.

Full text
Abstract:
Ce mémoire vise à évaluer les réformes consistant à encadrer le pouvoir de nomination que confère la prérogative royale au premier ministre. Notre étude s’inspire largement de l’institutionnalisme historique en science politique et des analyses en termes de « path dependency ». Selon cette approche, lorsque les décideurs amorcent une trajectoire de politique publique, leurs décisions subséquentes auront tendance à suivre la même direction. À partir des documents gouvernementaux et des transcriptions de comités parlementaires, ainsi que de l’exemple de la Grande-Bretagne, ce travail cherche à évaluer si les réformes visant à contraindre le pouvoir de nomination du premier ministre canadien ont suivi une trajectoire « path dependent ». Nos conclusions nous amènent plutôt à constater qu’en ce qui concerne les nominations, le Canada est plus monarchique que la Grande-Bretagne. Pour le Canada, l’impression générale qui se dégage à la fin de ce mémoire n’en est pas une de « path dependence » mais plutôt d’incrémentalisme disjoint.
This paper aims to assess the reforms that regulate the appointment power conferred by the Royal Prerogative to the Prime minister. Our study is largely based on historical institutionalism in political science and analysis in terms of “path dependency”. This theory argues that once policymakers begin a course of public policy, their subsequent decisions will follow the same direction. Based on governmental documents, transcripts of parliamentary committees and the example of Great Britain, this work seeks to assess whether the reforms to constrain the appointment power of the Prime Minister of Canada validates the “path dependence” approach. Our findings leads us rather to see that with regard to appointments, Canada is more monarchical than Great Britain. Our general conclusion is that the Canadian approach is not “path dependent” but can be better described as “disjointed incrementalism”.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Prerogative, Royal"

1

Evatt, Herbert Vere. The royal prerogative. Sydney: Law Book Co., 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chitty, Joseph. A treatise on the law of the prerogatives of the crown, and the relative duties and rights of the subject. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Chitty, Joseph. A treatise on the law of the prerogatives of the crown, and the relative duties and rights of the subject. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Journées, d'histoire et histoire du droit et des institutions de l'université de Perpignan (1st 2004 Perpignan France). Pouvoirs municipaux et pouvoir royal en Roussillon et en Languedoc, XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles. [Perpignan]: Presses universitaires de Perpignan, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hwang, Sŏn-yŏng. Koryŏ chʻogi wangkwŏn yŏnʾgu. Pusan-si: Tonga Taehakkyo Chʻulpʻanbu, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hwang, Sŏn-yŏng. Koryŏ chʻogi wangkwŏn yŏnʼgu. Pusan-si: Tonga Taehakkyo Chʻulpʻanbu, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Journées d'histoire et histoire du droit et des institutions de l'université de Perpignan (1st 2004 Perpignan, France). Pouvoirs municipaux et pouvoir royal en Roussillon et en Languedoc, XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles. [Perpignan]: Presses universitaires de Perpignan, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Gilbert, Larguier, and Journées d'histoire et histoire du droit et des institutions 1 : 2004 : Perpignan, eds. Pouvoirs municipaux et pouvoir royal en Roussillon et en Languedoc, XVIIe-XVIIIe siècle. Perpignan: Presses universitaires de Perpignan, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Torres, Manuel Fernández-Fontecha. La monarquía y la constitución. Madrid: Fundación "Agrupación Independiente del Senado 1977", Editorial Civitas, S.A., 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bagshaw, Edward. The rights of the crovvn of England as it is established by law: [microform]. London: Printed by A.M. for Simon Miller, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Prerogative, Royal"

1

Barnett, Hilaire. "The Royal Prerogative." In Constitutional & Administrative Law, 97–120. Twelfth edition. | Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315458373-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Barnett, Hilaire. "The Royal Prerogative." In Constitutional & Administrative Law, 97–120. 13th edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429322686-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Barnett, Hilaire. "The Royal Prerogative." In Constitutional and Administrative Law, 98–122. 15th ed. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003360438-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cox, Noel. "Curtailment of the prerogative." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 202–14. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cox, Noel. "Classification of the prerogative." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 83–102. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cox, Noel. "The prerogative and statute." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 166–78. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cox, Noel. "The prerogative and convention." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 179–201. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Cox, Noel. "The origins of the prerogative." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 20–38. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cox, Noel. "The nature of the prerogative." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 39–54. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cox, Noel. "The scope of the prerogative." In The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law, 55–82. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge research in legal history: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Prerogative, Royal' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography