To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Principe de contradictoire.
Journal articles on the topic 'Principe de contradictoire'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Principe de contradictoire.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Ferrand, Frédérique. "Le principe contradictoire et l'expertise en droit comparé européen." Revue internationale de droit comparé 52, no. 2 (2000): 345–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/ridc.2000.18099.
Full text
2
Blanc, Mafalda de Faria. "A Leitura Hegeliana de Espinoza e de Leibniz." Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 4, no. 8 (1996): 95–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philosophica19964825.
Full textAbstract:
La lecture hégélienne des philosophies de Spinoza et de Leibniz est présentée par l’analyse comparative des textes de l'"Anotation" de la Science de la Logique et des Leçons sur l'Histoire de la Philosophie. On conclut que les contextes et les dates différentes des deux textes ne changent pas le fond de l’interprétation hégélienne des deux cartésiens, laquelle mesure par rapport à sa propre conception de l'Absolu ces deux philosophies, comprenant leur principe - unilatéral et contradictoire - de la totalité (Spinoza) et de l'individualité (Leibniz) comme un moment indispensable, mais dépassé, de l'auto-conception de l'Idée.
3
Martouzet, Denis. "La complexité aux limites de la rationalité. Proposition de définition de la structure de base de la complexité du couple actions-attitudes par la critique du principe du tiers-exclu." Articles hors thème 11, no. 1 (2016): 377–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1035942ar.
Full textAbstract:
Cet article vise la définition d’une structure de base de la complexité dans le couple attitude cognitive/action par la remise en cause du principe de tiers exclu. Prenant pour point de départ la volonté humaine, il est montré que, celle-ci faisant preuve de faiblesse (akrasie aristotélicienne et objectifs que l’on se fixe relevant des effets essentiellement secondaires de Jon Elster), la personne met en oeuvre des stratégies d’autocontrainte (comme l’engagement) irrationnelles mais efficaces. Leur efficacité découle de la capacité humaine à être de mauvaise foi, au sens sartrien du terme : une mauvaise foi en toute bonne foi. La structure de cette mauvaise foi est fondée sur le résultat de la coprésence contradictoire entre croyances incompatibles et, même, leur renforcement réciproque, malgré le fait que se forcer à croire est un exemple d’effet essentiellement secondaire, soit un objectif que l’on ne peut vouloir. C’est le mécanisme de cette contradiction qui est décrit, remettant en cause ce principe du tiers exclu. Le résultat de ce mécanisme peut être pensé comme la « brique élémentaire » de la complexité humaine.
4
Bernigaud, Sylvie. "Le silence et le procès civil." Les Cahiers de droit 56, no. 3-4 (2015): 257–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1034452ar.
Full textAbstract:
Qu’il soit ou non le reflet d’une stratégie procédurale, le silence est valorisé lorsqu’il s’inscrit dans une optique respectueuse des droits de la défense et du principe du contradictoire. Le Code de procédure civile lui attribue une valeur fonctionnelle qui dépend à la fois de la maîtrise des parties sur le déroulement du procès et de la responsabilité du juge en matière juridictionnelle, concernant la régulation de l’instance. Accepté, toléré ou réprouvé, le silence n’est pas un, mais s’exprime de différentes manières dans le cadre du procès civil, ce qui rend aléatoire toute tentative d’intégration dans telle ou telle catégorie juridique. Il n’est pas pour autant l’expression d’une quelconque anarchie procédurale, la loi encadrant ses différentes manifestations et les effets juridiques qu’elles produisent.
5
TEIXEIRA E CASTRO, Cecília. "A IMPLICAÇÃO DO PRINCÍPIO DO CONTRADITÓRIO NO INCIDENTE DA DESCONSIDERAÇÃO DA PERSONALIDADE JURÍDICA." Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca 14, no. 2 (2019): 11–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.21207/1983.4225.607.
Full text
6
Christensen, Tom, and Per Lægreid. "Les principes contradictoires de l'organisation des agences : la réorganisation d'une réforme." Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives 78, no. 4 (2012): 621. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/risa.784.0621.
Full text
7
Irawan, Dedy Setyo, and Harvini Wulansari. "Pengukuran Pihak Ketiga Pasca Asas Contradictoire Delimitatie di Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Pasuruan." Tunas Agraria 3, no. 2 (2020): 53–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.31292/jta.v3i2.107.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: Complete Systematic Land Registration is a program which taken by the government in providing legal certainty in the field of land in Indonesia. PTSL activities at Sidoarjo Regency and Pasuruan Regency Land Office are carried out with third parties. Before starting the measurement, it is necessary to carry out the contradictoire delimitatie principle to ensure legal certainty of ownership of land rights. The research used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. The data analysis carried out by compiling logically proportional statements to answer research questions. Problem analysis is carried out by making a description based on premier data and secondary data obtained through interviews and observations of implementation. The results of the research showed that the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle is broadly following PP. No. 24 of 1997 and PMNA KaBPN No. 3 of 1997. The results of the study also showed that there were obstacles in the implementation of the contradictoire delimitatie principle, such as the third parties were not following technical guidelines No. 01 / JUKNIS-300/1/2018 annex 10 in the making of measurement drawings. Quality control is needed to improve the quality of work and results of third party products and minimize land problems in the future.Keywords: principle of contradictoire delimitation, third party. Intisari : Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) merupakan langkah pemerintah dalam memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dalam bidang pertanahan di Indonesia. Kegiatan PTSL di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sidoarjo dan Kabupaten Pasuruan dilaksanakan bekerjasama dengan Pihak Ketiga yang sebelumnya melalui tahapan asas contradictoire delimitatie untuk menjamin kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Teknik analisa yang dilakukan yaitu dengan menyusun pernyataan-pernyataan proposional secara logis untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Analisa permasalahan dilakukan dengan membuat uraian berdasarkan data premier dan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui wawancara serta observasi langsung terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan asas contradictoire delimitatie secara garis besar telah sesuai dengan PP. No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan PMNA KaBPN No. 3 Tahun 1997. Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat hambatan yakni pembuatan Gambar Ukur oleh Pihak Ketiga tidak sesuai dengan pedoman JUKNIS No. 01/JUKNIS-300/1/2018 lampiran 10. Sehingga diperlukan pengawasan kendali mutu terkait pekerjaan dan hasil produk dari Pihak Ketiga agar kedepannya hasil pekerjaan yang dihasilkan lebih baik dan tidak menjadi permasalahan pertanahan dikemudian hari.Kata Kunci : asas contradictoire delimitatie, pihak ketiga.
8
Barraband, Mathilde, and Julien Bougie. "Un projet contrarié. L’histoire de la littérature contemporaine française au tournant du xxe siècle1." Tangence, no. 102 (February 10, 2014): 31–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1022656ar.
Full textAbstract:
Au tournant du xxe siècle, alors que l’histoire littéraire se transforme profondément et s’essaie à de nouvelles approches, alors que s’opposent des visions contradictoires de la fonction de la critique littéraire et que le lectorat s’élargit et se diversifie, il semble qu’un goût pour le contemporain s’affirme de manière relativement consensuelle au sein de la discipline. Le consensus est d’autant plus étonnant que l’ambition d’une histoire du présent est paradoxale et qu’elle contrevient à une certaine idée de l’histoire littéraire comme conservatrice. L’article propose d’observer le sort que les historiens de la littérature du tournant du xxe siècle ont réservé dans leurs histoires à la littérature de leur temps, et de répondre à quelques-unes des interrogations que cette pratique contradictoire soulève. L’observation des pratiques mais aussi des justifications des premiers historiens modernes de la littérature quant à l’étude du contemporain sera ainsi l’occasion de saisir plus largement les préoccupations et les principes de l’histoire littéraire au moment où elle se fonde et s’institue, se faisant alors la chambre d’échos des inquiétudes nationales et identitaires de la France du dernier xixe siècle.
9
Bartenstein, Kristin. "L'article XX du GATT : le principe de proportionnalité et la concordance concrète entre le commerce et l'environnement." Les Cahiers de droit 43, no. 4 (2005): 651–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/043727ar.
Full textAbstract:
La problématique « commerce et environnement » a de multiples facettes et l'interprétation de l'article XX b) et g) du General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), qui sert dans cet accord d'interface entre les deux aspects, en est une. La jurisprudence relative à cet article semble désormais lui accorder une valeur équivalente aux dispositions de fond du GATT. Cette évolution très souhaitable démontre que la jurisprudence est enfin prête à donner un poids convenable aux considérations environnementales. Seulement, le problème de concilier les objectifs contradictoires de libéralisation des marchés et de protection de l'environnement persiste. C'est le droit communautaire européen qui livrera un mécanisme d'harmonisation approprié : le principe de concordance concrète. Pour réaliser cette dernière, il est utile de recourir au principe de proportionnalité, bien établi en droit communautaire. Avec ces principes, l'Organe de règlement des différends de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce (OMC) dispose d'importants outils de réflexion qui lui permettent de bâtir sur une base plus cohérente et plus logique sa jurisprudence pourtant bien amorcée.
10
BRAVO SENMACHE, LUIS MARTÍN. "EL DERECHO A PROBAR EN EL PROCEDIMIENTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y SANCIÓN DEL HOSTIGAMIENTO SEXUAL: ¿UNA GARANTÍA RECORTADA?" YachaQ Revista de Derecho, no. 11 (July 31, 2020): 91–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.51343/yq.vi11.363.
Full textAbstract:
Con base en la teoría general del proceso, la investigación determina que en el Procedimiento de Investigación y Sanción del Hostigamiento Sexual (PISHS)es identificable la estructura del contradictorio, por lo que su naturaleza es la de un proceso. Sin embargo, la revisión del tratamiento normativo que el PISHS ha dedicado al derecho a la prueba de la parte acusada pone en evidencia que, en la estructura de dicho proceso, el contradictorio no ha sido implementado más que parcialmente, dado que su dimensión sustancial (específicamente, el poder de influencia) no ha sido cabalmente asegurada a favor del presunto/a hostigador/a. Dos escenarios se erigen como posible solución al problema: uno a través de la vía de hecho (preferencia del principio del debido proceso) y otro mediante la reforma legislativa del art. 17.2 del reglamento.
 Based on the general theory of the process, the investigation determines that in the Investigation and Sanction Procedure for Sexual Harassment (PISHS) the structure of the contradictory is identifiable, so its nature is that of a process. However, the review of the normative treatment that the PISHS has dedicated to the right to proof of the accused party shows that, in the structure of said process, the contradictory has only been partially implemented, given that its substantial dimension (specifically, the power of influence) has not been fully secured in favor of the alleged harasser. Two scenariosare erected as a possible solution to the problem: one through the facto route (preference for the principle of due process of law) and the other through the legislative reform of the art. 17.2 of the reglament.
11
Gupta, Vishal. "Comparative Performance of Contradictory and Non-Contradictory Judgement Matrices in AHP Under Qualitative and Quantitative Metrics." International Journal of Decision Support System Technology 10, no. 1 (2018): 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijdsst.2018010102.
Full textAbstract:
Over the years, although AHP has proved its success in various diverse fields, many authors in the literature have also shown its shortcomings, often called as criticisms of AHP. One such criticism is allowing the consideration of contradictory judgement matrices. Such matrices violate the principle of ordinal transitivity and thus there does not exist any ranking of corresponding decision elements which satisfy all the judgements. In this paper, the results of our investigation towards measuring this criticism are further explored and discussed by comparing the quality of priority vector of contradictory judgement matrices and non-contradictory judgement matrices under Rank Reversals and the common frame work of “aggregated deviation”. The results further strengthen the notion of contradictory judgement matrices as a strong criticism of AHP for higher order judgement matrices and necessitate some proper avoidance (if not elimination) procedure for them.
12
Zhilkin, A. G. "RELATIVE PRINCIPLE OF FULL ABSORPTION." Metafizika, no. 2 (December 15, 2020): 34–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2020-2-34-49.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses the principle of complete absorption, which plays the same role in relational theory as the principle of equivalence in general relativity and the principle of waveparticle duality in quantum theory. The physical essence of this principle boils down to the fact that a sufficiently large number of particles must be present in the Universe so that complete absorption of radiation from any source is possible. This implies complete equivalence, from the experimental point of view, of direct interparticle interaction and the interaction carried by a local field in spacetime. It is noted that in its classical interpretation the Fokker variational principle, on which the theory of direct interparticle interaction is based, contains a dilemma caused by two mutually contradictory necessary properties of the interaction action. One of the options for overcoming this dilemma is proposed.
13
HARUTYUNYAN, MANUK, and SONA DAVTYAN. "PRINCIPLE OF INFORMED CONSENT AND SOME ETHICAL ISSUES OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE." Main Issues Of Pedagogy And Psychology 16, no. 1 (2018): 204–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v16i1.339.
Full textAbstract:
The article addresses some of the ethical problems of experimental medicine. The main focus of the research is the disclosure of the complex and contradictory nature of the influence of the principle of informed consent on the experiments in the field of medicine.
14
Jones, Russell E. "Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 6-9." Phronesis 55, no. 1 (2010): 26–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/003188610x12589452898804.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIn De Interpretatione 6-9, Aristotle considers three logical principles: the principle of bivalence, the law of excluded middle, and the rule of contradictory pairs (according to which of any contradictory pair of statements, exactly one is true and the other false). Surprisingly, Aristotle accepts none of these without qualification. I offer a coherent interpretation of these chapters as a whole, while focusing special attention on two sorts of statements that are of particular interest to Aristotle: universal statements not made universally and future particular statements. With respect to the former, I argue that Aristotle takes them to be indeterminate and so to violate the rule of contradictory pairs. With respect to the latter, the subject of the much discussed ninth chapter, I argue that the rule of contradictory pairs, and not the principle of bivalence, is the focus of Aristotle’s refutation. Nevertheless, Aristotle rejects bivalence for future particular statements.
15
Fisher, E. "Precaution, law and principles of good administration." Water Science and Technology 52, no. 6 (2005): 19–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0146.
Full textAbstract:
The precautionary principle is a legal principle concerned with the process of how decisions are made. In implementing and interpreting it regard must be had to the surrounding legal culture and in particular the principles of good administration in operation. Highlighting those principles emphasises that within a particular jurisdiction there is often very little agreement over their nature. Within the European Union contradictory principles are the product of: assumptions about risk problem-solving, the ambiguous nature of European administration, a concern with accountability in the face of recent food controversies, and the impact of international trade rules. These contradictory principles present a number of challenges for implementing the precautionary principle.
16
Kronis, Ivars. "Likumības princips civilprocesā: formālas lietu vešanas kārtības pamats civillietās." SOCRATES. Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls / SOCRATES. Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of Law 1, no. 19 (2021): 110–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.25143/socr.19.2020.1.110-119.
Full textAbstract:
Rakstā tiek apskatīts jautājums par likumības principa izpausmi un saturu civilprocesā. Pētījumā tiek aplūkoti likumības principa procesuālie un materiāli tiesiskie jautājumi. In the article, the author examines the matter of the expression and content of the principle of legality in civil procedure, more specifically focusing on the procedural and substantive problems of the principle of legality. Civil procedure is universal as a compulsory form of protection of subjective rights or, in other words, civil procedure is a procedure for compulsory exercise of civil rights, which is reduced to a set of norms that determine the type of actions of both existing legal protection institutions and persons who use this protection or are involved in it in any other way. Legality plays an important role in this regard. Legality means a state of life of the society which, firstly, has a legal framework, which is not logically contradictory and which generally meets the objective needs of this society and, secondly, natural and legal persons respect and follow the legal norms adopted. In civil procedure, this is not only a principle, but also one of the aims of legal proceedings. According to its content, the principle of legality includes, firstly, the requirement that the courts apply the norms of the substantive law correctly and carry out procedural actions in accordance with the legal norms; secondly, the requirement that other participants of the procedure comply with the procedural and substantive legal regulation when adjudicating and considering civil cases in court. Thus, the principle of legality includes procedural and substantive components. The aim of the article is, by analysing the moral-legal content of the principle of legality, to evaluate the aspects of its application. Material and methods used in the study for the empirical basis of the research include scientific works and collections of articles, publications in periodicals and primary sources, laws, internet resources, as well as other publicly available information. Analytical, inductive and deductive research methods have been used in the research.
17
Arbour, Maurice. "Le principe de précaution dans le contexte du commerce international : une intégration difficile." Les Cahiers de droit 43, no. 1 (2005): 5–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/043700ar.
Full textAbstract:
Les décisions de tout État de droit s'inscrivent généralement dans un contexte juridique global où l'arbitraire et la discrimination sont systématiquement dénoncés et sanctionnés et où la population s'attend des acteurs politiques qu'ils agissent avec un minimum de rationalité et d'une manière conforme au droit, y compris le droit international. Le principe de précaution a été conçu pour gérer une situation d'incertitude : l'absence d'une certitude scientifique absolue ne doit pas servir de prétexte pour différer l'adoption de mesures de précaution, c'est-à-dire de mesures qui permettraient d'éviter le danger ou d'en atténuer les effets. Parce qu'il entend couper avec la rationalité scientifique dont il n'y a plus rien à attendre puisque, par définition, toute action s'accomplit dans un contexte d'incertitude scientifique, l'appel au principe se situe inévitablement sur le plan politique et va nécessairement opposer des valeurs et des intérêts contradictoires ; il faut une opinion publique éclairée et bien informée des principaux enjeux en cause et un forum ouvert où les diverses options peuvent être débattues. En même temps, dans la mesure où ce principe apparaît comme une approche rationnelle dans la gestion des risques, son application présuppose qu'il y a eu une analyse sérieuse et objective des risques envisageables et cette dernière relève essentiellement de l'expertise scientifique : c'est même son point de départ; on aurait donc tort de penser que le principe est une licence générale pour justifier l'arbitraire ou voiler des mesures protectionnistes. Le défi, dans la construction du principe de précaution, c'est de pouvoir intégrer des besoins contradictoires nés, d'une part, de la nécessité de protéger le droit à la libre entreprise, ainsi que l'esprit d'innovation si nécessaire au progrès technologique, et partant au développement économique, et, d'autre part, la nécessité de réduire le risque d'effets négatifs sérieux et irréversibles sur l'environnement.
18
Okolo, Bertram A. "Incongruency in Discourse: A Violation of the "Cooperative Principle"?" Meta 41, no. 3 (2002): 378–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/003762ar.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Incongruency, when regarded as a verbal behavioral act that functions to create contradictory meanings in discourse, seems to violate aspects of the Gricean "Cooperative Principle" that are supposed to guide our every-day conversational encounters. With the aid of actual examples, this paper looks at incongruent conversational exchanges and discusses the factors governing their toleration in conversational interaction, the cross-cultural aspects of incongruent behavioral acts, their translational implications, and suggests that strict observances of the "Cooperative Principle" are restricted to particular types of discourses.
19
Brunet, Louis. "RÉFLEXION SUR TROIS POINTS DE DÉONTOLOGIE." Revue québécoise de psychologie 39, no. 3 (2019): 223–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1058191ar.
Full textAbstract:
La déontologie est un ensemble de règles qui doivent être interprétées à la lumière de principes éthiques et de principes cliniques. Il existe actuellement dans la pratique psychologique au Québec une série de règles déontologiques qui font l’objet d’interprétations fort diverses et même contradictoires. Le texte propose d’analyser trois de ces problèmes d’interprétation, en proposant ce qui nous semble être des interprétations qui respectent à la fois l’éthique et les grands principes cliniques, tout en espérant susciter un sain débat sur ces questions.
20
de Souza, Arun. "The Coloured Lens Effect: Disentangling the Contradictory Discourses within Watershed Policies." Sociological Bulletin 67, no. 3 (2018): 290–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038022918796917.
Full textAbstract:
This proposed article seeks to analyse the Hariyali guidelines in order to show how a capitalistic, managerial and scientific rationale is used which presumes that nature in order to be valued must have a productive value. As a capitalist enterprise, nature is only useful if it serves the livelihood needs of the populace. All other values are elided in favour of one overarching idea of productivity for the market. This productivity is sought to be harnessed through the twin ideas of proper managerial and scientific principles. The ‘Watershed Users Association’ is premised on the principle of people being rational maximisers who will put aside their caste, gender, religious and class differences in order to transform the topographical watershed into a productive entrepreneurial community enterprise. On the ground, people of course manage to subvert and resist these processes even as they acquiesce in the larger development plan.
21
Milidrag, Predrag. "The principle of noncontradiction and Descartes' god." Theoria, Beograd 53, no. 4 (2010): 15–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1004015m.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the status of the principle of non-contradiction as an eternal truth in Descartes' metaphysics, and tries to answer the question is it caused. After making the difference between created and uncreated eternal truths, the reached conclusion is that the principle of non-contradiction is created eternal truth. As such, it could be applied even to God but only if we understand him as the most perfect being. The very essence of God, that is absolute power i.e. causa sui is beyond the range of this principle, because absolute power as the essence of God is the realm of absolute identity between His essence and His existence. Since man can think only in accordance with the principle of non-contradiction, even God's infinite power he must understand with regard to that principle. Nevertheless, since the principle of non-contradiction is not applicable on God's absolute identity, its absence man understands as its negation, and because of that, that identity appears to him as self-contradictory. In the end, it is shown a (partial) lack of ground of Lebniz's critique of Descartes concerning ontological argument.
22
Laurier, Daniel. "Note sur le puzzle de Kripke." L’énigme de Kripke 15, no. 1 (2007): 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/027032ar.
Full textAbstract:
RÉSUMÉ Je soutiens que Kripke n'a pas réussi à montrer que certains principes plausibles gouvernant l'attribution de croyances, tels que les principes de décitation et de traduction, pouvaient nous conduire à attribuer des croyances de dicto contradictoires à un sujet réfléchi et linguistiquement compétent sans présupposer une théorie descriptive des noms propres ou des termes désignant des espèces naturelles. Les cas décrits par Kripke se réduisent à des variantes du problème de Quine concernant les croyances de re ou à des variantes du puzzle de Mates concernant l'intersubstiruabilité des synonymes dans les contextes de croyance.
23
Sabri, Mohammad Nizar. "THE PUBLICITY PRINCIPLE IN MAKING THE DEED OF THE NUPTIAL AGREEMENT BY NOTARY." Hang Tuah Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2018): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v2i1.37.
Full textAbstract:
<p>The settlement of this research conclude that; the Resolution of Constitutional Council Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 with regard to nuptial agreements is contradictory to the purpose of the publicity principle. Ratio legis of The authorization related to the publicity of notaries is also contradictory to the obligations of notaries to maintain the confidentiality of the content of a deed and the professional oath of notaries as regulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f of the Amendment to UUJN, in conjunction with Article 4 paragraph (2) of UUJN. The existence of the Letter from the Director General of the Demography and Civil Registry as well as circular letter of the Directorate General of Islamic community guidance (Ditjen Bimasislam) on the registration of Reporting Nuptial Agreements; such letter does not follow up in relation to the resolutions of the Constitutional Council. However, the endeavour made to interpret the resolutions of the Constitutional Council by the Director General of Demography and Civil Registry is inconsistent with the resolution already mentioned by the Constitutional Council (MK). In its first point it is stated that a nuptial agreement can be made drawn up in a notarized deed, on the other hand, the Constitutional Council, in its resolution, only mentions that a nuptial agreement may be drawn up in writing, which means that it may be executed by the parties only or be drawn up as a notarized deed.</p>
24
Puriani, Wahyu Dwi, I. Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, and Lego Karjoko. "Determination of the application of contradictoire delimitatie principles in collecting physical data in the magetan national land agency office (study in magetan district)." Research, Society and Development 10, no. 6 (2021): e59710616477. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.16477.
Full textAbstract:
The determination and stipulation of appropriate limits with the principle of Contradictoire Delimitatie becomes the main keys before implementing the land measurement. Lawsuit could arise which results in re-measurement and even the cancellation of the certificate. This research is normative research type (doctrinal research), statute approach and conceptual approach and focuses to the literature study; the research source data is secondary data. The mechanism for determining and stipulation boundaries in land registration has applied the principle of safety. The law consequence if the determination and stipulation boundaries in land are not accordance with the fact in the field resulting in the absence of legal certainty for the certificate of land rights. Conclusion and suggestion in this research is in determination and determination of land plot boundaries in order to achieve legal certainty must in accordance with PP No. 24 of 1997 and PMNA/KaBPN No.3 (Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of BPN) of 1997. Magetan Regency National Land Agency Office before implementing the measurement activities must be thoroughly in the process of determination of land plot boundary in order to reaches the law certainty, it can be accounted for.
25
Heßdörfer, Florian, and Steffen Wittig. "Leistung, Ritual und Optimierung." Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik 97, no. 2 (2021): 127–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/25890581-09702002.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Performance, Ritual and Optimization The phenomenon of optimization indicates an ongoing change in the performance principle. For a deeper understanding of this process, we analyze aspects that underlie the daily practices of performance: We pursue the open question of the contradictory conditions of the modern performance principle and its subjectivizing effects, present the concept of ritual as a way of dealing with this contradictoriness and show how rituals maintain the collective belief in performance.
26
Friedrich, Krieter, Kemper, and Czycholl. "Test−Retest Reliability of the ‘Welfare Quality® Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sows and Piglets’. Part 1. Assessment of the Welfare Principle of ‘Appropriate Behavior’." Animals 9, no. 7 (2019): 398. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9070398.
Full textAbstract:
The present study’s aim was to assess the test−retest reliability (TRR) of the ‘Welfare Quality® animal welfare assessment protocol for sows and piglets’ focusing on the welfare principle ‘appropriate behavior’. TRR was calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (RS), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), smallest detectable change (SDC), and limits of agreement (LoA). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for deeper analysis of the Qualitative Behavior Assessment (QBA). The study was conducted on thirteen farms in Northern Germany, which were visited five times by the same observer. Farm visits 1 (F1; day 0) were compared to farm visits 2 to 5 (F2–F5). The QBA indicated no TRR when applying the statistical parameters introduced above (e.g., ‘playful‘ (F1–F4) RS 0.08 ICC 0.00 SDC 0.50 LoA [−0.62, 0.38]). The PCA detected contradictory TRR. Acceptable TRR could be found for parts of the instantaneous scan sampling (e.g., negative social behavior (F1–F3) RS 0.45 ICC 0.37 SDC 0.02 LoA [−0.03, 0.02]). The human−animal relationship test solely achieved poor TRR, whereas scans for stereotypies showed sufficient TRR (e.g., floor licking (F1–F4) RS 0.63 ICC 0.52 SDC 0.05 LoA [−0.08, 0.04]). Concluding, the principle ‘appropriate behavior’ does not represent TRR and further investigation is needed before implementation on-farm.
27
Engeström, Y. "Ascending from the Abstract to the Concrete as a Principle of Expansive Learning." Психологическая наука и образование 25, no. 5 (2020): 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250503.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the potential of the dialectical principle of ascending from the abstract to the concrete for transforming practices of learning. It is shown that V.V. Davydov’s work has created a foundation for such transformation. The theory of expansive learning builds on Davydov’s legacy and brings the principle of ascending from the abstract to the concrete into learning and concept formation outside schools, “in the wild.” Three studies investigating different scales of expansive learning are discussed, focusing on the internally contradictory germ cells discovered and used in those studies. The article concludes by emphasizing the need to integrate Davydov’s revolutionary pedagogy and the broader agenda of school transformation as part of societal transformation.
28
Benz, Arthur. "Federal Democracy between Autonomy and Interdependence." Federal Governance 15, no. 2 (2019): 45–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/fg.v15i2.13374.
Full textAbstract:
According to common concepts of federalism, a federal system should balance unity and diversity, integration and differentiation, centralization and decentralization. Although there is no principle that determines an appropriate balance or an optimal combination, in reality, these contradictory requirements are met by political compromises and ongoing processes of allocating and reallocation power and resources.
29
Zamarytė, Kristina, Donatas Stakišaitis, Agnė Širinskienė, Andrius Narbekovas, and Jonas Juškevičius. "Pharmacovigilance and Principle of Nonmaleficence in Sex Reassignment." Medicina 48, no. 11 (2012): 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina48110088.
Full textAbstract:
Physicians are obliged to provide treatment that is consistent with their commitment to avoid or minimize harm (nonmaleficence) and their commitment to do good (beneficence). Therefore, if patient’s desires were contradictory to the primary aim of medicine, the doctor’s calling would require him/her to thoroughly analyze the cause of the disease and provide an adequate as well as ethical treatment rather than obediently follow patient’s requests. Yet, chemical and surgical sex reassignment is one of the areas where some physicians surrender to the desire of their patients instead of finding out what their real condition is and trying to manage it in a way the essence of medicine would require. The objective of this article was to provide specific pharmacovigilance search details for the evaluation of the current situation and the scientific background of the treatment of gender dysphoria and to analyze its conformity with one of the two main ethical principles of medicine – nonmaleficence. Literature retrieval was accessed through Medline (1979–2011) using the terms “gender dysphoria,” “replacement hormonal therapy,” and “pharmacovigilance.” The article concludes that hormonal and surgical interventions have not proven to be medically justified and could be harmful, not treating the cause, but resulting in irreversible disability. Thus, these interventions contradict the principle of nonmaleficence and goals of basic therapeutics and pharmacovigilance. They are not based on clinical trials and are lacking a thorough follow-up assessment.
30
Rodrigues, André Machado, and Cristiano Rodrigues de Mattos. "THE CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND SCHOOL." Problems of Education in the 21st Century 76, no. 1 (2018): 87–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.87.
Full textAbstract:
There is a growing understanding that teacher education should not be handled either exclusively by the University or in School settings. Nevertheless, the issues on how to foster a fruitful partnership between these two different institutions remains an open and challenging point. The practicum is a critical point in the pre-service teacher’s development, usually because it is the first time they have to face the concrete professional issues, which they only had a partial view of as students. This research is a year-long inquiry on practicum in the Physics teaching program developed in the Institute of Physics at the University of São Paulo, Brazil. Drawing on cultural-historical activity theory, contradiction is used as an explanatory principle to examine change and development in the practitioners’ activity. Therefore, the research includes in the analytical framework the contradictions and the processes of overcoming it. Examples are provided in which there is little control therefore demanding extra efforts but makes room for active participation. The data analysis indicates that the source of agency and activities transformation is precisely a contradictory process, which might be overlooked. The pre-service teachers’ agency is shaped by contradictory process within the activity – practicum - rather than aligned forces pushing it toward autonomy, student sensitiveness or professional identity. Keywords: initial teacher education, practicum, university-school partnership, qualitative research.
31
Puriani, Wahyu Dwi, I. Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, and Lego Karjoko. "DETERMINATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CONTRADICTOIRE DELIMITATIE PRINCIPLES IN COLLECTING PHYSICAL DATA IN THE MAGETAN NATIONAL LAND AGENCY OFFICE (STUDY IN MAGETAN DISTRICT)." International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS ) 9, no. 1 (2021): 251–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0438.
Full textAbstract:
Land certificate is the proof of ownership of land rights. Moreover, the certificate making must implemented with the successive procedure in accordance with UUPA (Basic Agrari-an Law) within the renewal rules that are always updated by government. The determina-tion and stipulation of appropriate limits with the principle of Contradictoire Delimitatie becomes the main key before implementing the land measurement. Because, without a boundary agreement between the land owners adjacent to the registered land, it will be-come a time bomb in the future, lawsuit could arise which results in re-measurement and even the cancellation of the certificate. This research is normative research type (doctrinal research) with statute approach and conceptual approach. This research focuses to the literature study; data which becomes the research source is secondary data. This will give the answer that the mechanism for determining and stipulation boundaries in land registra-tion has applied the principle of safety, so the land owner get the legal certainty of owner-ship of their rights. The law consequence if the determination and stipulation boundaries in land are not accordance with the fact in the field resulting in the absence of legal cer-tainty for the certificate of land rights. Conclusion and suggestion in this research is in determination and determination of land plot boundaries in order to achieve legal certainty must in accordance with PP (Government Regulation) No. 24 of 1997 and PMNA/KaBPN No.3 (Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of BPN) of 1997. Magetan Regency National Land Agency Office before implementing the measurement activities must be more thoroughly in the process of determination of land plot boundary in order to reaches the law certainty so that it can be accounted for.
32
Kalybaeva, К. "WE NEED A NEW APPROACH TO THE PRINCIPLE OF KAZAKH WRITING." BULLETIN Series of Philological Sciences 74, no. 4 (2020): 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.51889/2020-4.1728-7804.20.
Full textAbstract:
The very concept of the principle of writing needs to be clarified in today's context. This is due to the fact that the principle of writing is a necessary moment for the correct solution of controversial issues in writing. That is, a number of things that were once contradictory in writing as a result of the chosen principle of writing, have now fully formed and become a habit that does not cause difficulties in writing. However, of course, it cannot be said that the complexities of the Kazakh writing system have been completely resolved. From this point of view, it is obvious that the controversial issue in today's Kazakh writing is associated with the writing of foreign words. Consequently, the main principle of modern Kazakh writing should be to be able to resolve contradictions in the correct spelling of these words. This indicates the need to determine the relationship between the basic principle and additional principles of the Kazakh writing in today's rules of writing the Kazakh writing. In this article, we are trying to touch upon such complex problems of Kazakh writing.
33
Rodríguez Rodrigo, Juliana. "Procedimiento contradictorio en el marco de documentos públicos que reconocen créditos no impugnados. Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, de 9 de marzo de 2017, Ibrica Zulfikarpasic, c-484/15 = Inter partes nature of the proceedings in the framework of the authentic instruments on uncontested claims. Judgment of the Court (second chamber) of 9 march 2017, Ibrica Zulfikarpasic, case c-484/15." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 9, no. 2 (2017): 685. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2017.3897.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: El principio de contradicción en el procedimiento es el principal aspecto sobre el que se pronuncia el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea en esta sentencia, en el marco del Reglamento 805/2004, relativo al título ejecutivo europeo. Según esta norma, el crédito no impugnado que sea reconocido en una resolución judicial, en una transacción judicial o en un documento público con fuerza ejecutiva, podrá ser certificado como título ejecutivo europeo y, por tanto, podrá circular libremente por todala Unión Europea –excepto en Dinamarca– y ser ejecutado automáticamente en cualquier país de este entorno. Para certificar una resolución judicial como título ejecutivo europeo se exige, entre otros requisitos, que el procedimiento que da lugar al título haya sido notificado al deudor, para que tenga conocimiento de la existencia del mismo y pueda impugnarlo si lo desea (art. 6). Sin embargo, en el caso de un documento público, el Reglamento 805/2004 solo requiere que aquel tenga fuerza ejecutiva (art. 25.3). En la sentencia objeto de estudio, el Tribunal de Luxemburgo aplica los requisitos prescritos para la resolución judicial al documento público, al exigir en el caso que el mandamiento de ejecución que recoge el crédito, no puede certificarse como título ejecutivo europeo porque el procedimiento en el que se ha emitido no ha tenido carácter contradictorio y, por ello, el deudor no ha tenido oportunidad de poder defendersePalabras clave: título ejecutivo europeo, principio de contradicción, documentos públicos con fuerza ejecutiva.Abstract: The principle of audi alteram partem is the main aspect that is studied by the Court of Justice of the European Union in this judgment, within the framework of Regulation 805/2004 creating the European Enforcement Order. According to this text, an uncontested claim that is recognized ina judicial decision, in a court settlement or in an authentic instrument may be certified as a European Enforcement Order and therefore may be freely circulated throughout the European Union – except for Denmark - and be automatically executed in any country in this zone. In order to certify a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order, it is required, among other requirements, the procedure has been notified to the debtor, so the debtor is aware of its existence and can stand against it (Article 6). However, in the case of an authentic instrument, the Regulation 805/2004 only requires that it be enforceable (Article 25.3). In the judgment under consideration, the Luxembourg Court applies the requirements for the judicial decision to the an authentic instrument, by requiring in the case that the writ of execution containing the claim can not be certified as a European Enforcement Order because the procedure has not been contradictory and, therefore, the debtor has not had an opportunity to defend himself.Keywords: European Enforcement Order, principle of audi alteram partem, authentic instrument.
34
Pouivet, Roger. "Lukasiewicz : de l'aristotélisme autrichien à l'aristotélisme polonais." Philosophiques 26, no. 2 (2002): 263–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/004970ar.
Full textAbstract:
RÉSUMÉ En 1910, Jan Lukasiewicz publiait Du principe de contradiction chez Aristote. Dans cet article, on explique les points principaux du livre de Lukasiewicz. Ce dernier affirme qu’Aristote n’a pas réussi dans sa tentative pour justifier le principe de contradiction. En fait, ce principe est moins logique qu’éthique, selon Lukasiewicz, et cela explique bien des difficultés posées par la théorie d’Aristote. On discute également de la façon dont Lukasiewicz utilise la notion d’« objets contradictoires », empruntée à la Théorie des Objets de Meinong ; on montre que Lukasiewicz se situe dans le cadre d’une version brentanienne de l’aristotélisme. Certaines connexions entre Lukasiewicz et la conception wittgensteinienne de la nécessité ou le conservatisme logique de Quine sont indiquées. Le but de mon article est essentiellement d’encourager une lecture attentive du livre qui n’a pas reçu l’attention qu’il mérite parce qu’il a été écrit à l’origine en polonais. Souvent, les philosophes croient connaître son contenu à travers le résumé que Lukasiewicz écrivit en allemand en 1910, et qui a été traduit en anglais. Mais, en fait, il y a bien des choses importantes dans le livre qui n’apparaissent nullement dans le résumé.
35
Diawara, Karounga. "L’intégration des objectifs économiques et sociaux dans l’appréciation de l’exception d’efficience." Les Cahiers de droit 53, no. 2 (2012): 257–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1009443ar.
Full textAbstract:
Si, dans son principe, l’exception d’efficience semble simple, puisqu’elle prévoit une mise en balance entre les effets anticoncurrentiels, d’une part, et les gains en efficience, d’autre part, sa mise en oeuvre présente néanmoins plusieurs difficultés, dont la plus importante consiste en l’équilibrage et en la pondération entre les gains en efficience et les effets anticoncurrentiels. En effet, cet équilibrage des gains en efficience et des effets anticoncurrentiels doit fondamentalement tenir compte de tous les objectifs de nature économique et sociale poursuivis par le droit canadien de la concurrence. Dès lors, la question principale que suscite cette étude est de savoir comment faudrait-il concilier les objectifs de nature économique et sociale dans l’interprétation de l’exception d’efficience ? Cette étude explore ainsi la possibilité de la réception de normes de nature sociale au sein du droit de la concurrence qui, par ses objets, est caractérisé par une forte prégnance économique. Elle a pour objet de montrer à travers l’appréciation de l’exception d’efficience qu’une conciliation des objectifs en apparence contradictoires de nature sociale et économique est possible et souhaitable. À cet effet, le critère d’équilibrage des gains en efficience et des effets anticoncurrentiels, qui concilie et intègre le mieux les objectifs économiques et sociaux dans l’appréciation de la balance d’efficience, semble être le critère du surplus modéré du consommateur que nous proposons dans la seconde partie de l’étude.
36
Björling, Erik. "In the Procedural Surroundings of Consumer Protection: Online Dispute Resolution, the Adversarial Principle, and Tendencies toward Settlement." Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 13, no. 2 (2019): 311–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/mujlt2019-2-7.
Full textAbstract:
The article builds on a pluralistic perspective on law and the understanding that legal research must take into account the procedural and institutional landscape where legal rights are enforced. In relation to online dispute resolution (ODR), two procedural mechanisms, namely the adversarial principle and the tendency toward settlements, are studied and discussed. The adversarial principle (argued to be integral to most ODR procedures) and tendencies toward settlements (also argued to be integral to most ODR procedures) are considered in relation to the overarching (and possibly contradictory) objectives of protecting individual consumer rights and the interest of increasing economic efficiency within the EU’s internal market.
37
Sharpley, Christopher F., Vicki Bitsika, and David H. R. Christie. "Psychological Distress among Prostate Cancer Patients: Fact Or Fiction?" Clinical medicine. Oncology 2 (January 2008): CMO.S955. http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s955.
Full textAbstract:
Although the detrimental effect upon psychological well-being of receiving a diagnosis of, or treatment for, cancer has been demonstrated across many different types of cancer, three recent reviews of the psychological health of prostate cancer patients have produced contradictory conclusions. In order to elucidate the reasons for these apparent different conclusions, each of these reviews is described, with principal methods and findings summarised. Actual data, methodology used to select/reject research studies for inclusion in reviews, plus the validity of strict methodological culling of some research studies are discussed. Several extra studies and commentaries are also described, and a resolution of the apparent contradictory review conclusions is offered.
38
Fournier, Anne. "Le droit de l'enfant à la représentation par un avocat en matière de protection de la jeunesse." Les Cahiers de droit 37, no. 4 (2005): 971–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/043415ar.
Full textAbstract:
Le présent article constitue une réflexion sur la représentation d'un enfant par un avocat dans le contexte de l'application de la Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse. L'auteure entend notamment souligner les difficultés d'application de quelques principes et droits prévus par la loi. L'auteure discute de la représentation de l'enfant au stade de l'intervention sociale et judiciaire. Dans ce dernier cas, il est essentiellement traité de l'accessibilité au système judiciaire et du mandat de l'avocat de l'enfant dans un régime contradictoire. Certaines limites liées à l'exercice du mandat de l'avocat de l'enfant âgé de moins de 14 ans sont également portées à l'attention du lecteur.
39
Felthous, Alan R. "The Ever Confusing Jurisprudence of the Psychotherapist's Duty to Protect." Journal of Psychiatry & Law 17, no. 4 (1989): 575–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009318538901700403.
Full textAbstract:
When the duty to protect of Tarasoff was imposed upon psychotherapists by the Supreme Court of California, therapists in other states wondered whether or not other courts would adopt the legal reasoning and apply the Tarasoff Principle to them. Resulting court decisions have been much more complex and contradictory than this early question would suggest. Even the legal underpinnings of the Tarasoff Principle, where it has been adopted, are diverse: it is as amorphous and plastic as any principle can be, molded so differently by various courts. This updated review argues that the trend toward diversity and inconsistency has become greater with the increase in Tarasoff-like cases in recent years, beclouding any real moral value that may be present. Given the conflicting social values involved in this kind of public policy, it is best crafted in statutory law, not by the courts.
40
Kagan, Shelly. "The paradox of methods." Politics, Philosophy & Economics 17, no. 2 (2017): 148–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470594x17717737.
Full textAbstract:
Many proposed moral principles are such that it would be difficult or impossible to always correctly identify which act is required by that principle in a given situation. To deal with this problem, theorists typically offer various methods of determining what to do in the face of epistemic limitations, and we are then told that the right thing to do – given these limitations – is to perform the act identified by the given method. But since the method and the underlying principle can diverge, it would seem that in such cases we are being given contradictory advice: some particular act will be both right (since it is so identified by the favored method) and not right (since it does not conform to the underlying principle). Various attempts to resolve this apparent paradox are surveyed, but none are completely satisfactory.
41
Walter, Alex. "From Westermarck's Effect to Fox's Law: paradox and principle in the relationship between incest taboos and exogamy." Social Science Information 39, no. 3 (2000): 467–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/053901800039003007.
Full textAbstract:
Various theories that purport to explain the relationship between incest taboos and exogamous marriage customs are reviewed. These include sociological, psychological, and sociobiological approaches. Each of these approaches poses challenges not easily addressed by its competitors and yet no satisfactory synthesis seems available given the currently existing explanatory paradigms. It is argued here that exogamy is not a simple outgrowth of incest taboos and incest taboos are not a simple extenuation of inbreeding avoidance. Relationships between the sociobiology of inbreeding avoidance and social institutions such as exogamy and incest taboos are recast with the help of evolutionary psychology, which provides additional tools with which to approach this complex and contradictory set of interlocking problems.
42
Tomkin, Jonathan. "Contradiction, Circumvention and Conceptual Gymnastics: The Impact of the Adoption of the ESM Treaty on the State of European Democracy." German Law Journal 14, no. 1 (2013): 169–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200001759.
Full textAbstract:
This paper makes the claim that the legal framework governing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) is contradictory, conceptually incoherent and may be characterized as a circumvention of Union law. It is further claimed that such circumvention, and the resulting establishment of a significant permanent institution outside and beyond the scope of the Union legal order, represents a challenge to European democracy and to the principle of respect for the rule of law.
43
Acar, ELif, and Sugeng Sudrajat. "EFFECTIVENESS OF APPLYING PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL CERTAINTY OF JUSTICE IN THE HANDLING OF CRIMINAL CASE." Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 5, no. 3 (2018): 379. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v5i3.3745.
Full textAbstract:
The effectiveness of judges' verdict in the trial should ideally contain aspects of the rule of law, justice and expediency. In its implementation is not easy to synergize these three aspects, especially the aspect of legal certainty and fairness are usually contradictory. The results showed that the judge in examining and deciding cases not forever fixated on one principle alone. Constraints faced by judges tend to rule of law in deadlock when written provisions can not answer the problems that exist. Emphasis is more inclined to the principle of justice means should consider a law in society, which is made up of customs and unwritten laws. Judge within reason and legal considerations must be able to accommodate all the provisions that live in the community in the form of customs and unwritten laws. Emphasis tends to be on the principle of expediency over economic nuances.
44
Sudha, M. S., and T. C. Thanuja. "Effect of different attacks on image watermarking using dual tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT) and principle component analysis (PCA)." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 2.9 (2018): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2-9.9249.
Full textAbstract:
Perceptibility and robustness are two incongruous requirements demanded by digital image watermarking for digital right management and other applications. A realistic way to concurrently satisfy the two contradictory requirements is to use robust watermark algorithm. The developed algorithm uses DTCWT and PCA techniques to embed watermark signal in host signal. To prove the algorithm robustness without much affecting perceptibility several attacks like noises, cropping, blurring, rotation are applied and tested by varying attack parameters. Parameters like Peak signal noise ratio and Correlation Coefficient are calculated for each attack. Attack percentage is varied and performance parameters are calculated to prove the robustness of the developed algorithm.
45
Blackshaw, Bruce P. "Schrödinger’s fetus examined." Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23, no. 2 (2019): 321–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09936-0.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractJoona Räsänen has proposed a concept he calls Schrödinger’s Fetus as a solution to reconciling what he believes are two widely held but contradictory intuitions. I show that Elizabeth Harman’s Actual Future Principle, upon which Schrödinger’s Fetus is based, uses a more convincing account of personhood. I also argue that both Räsänen and Harman, by embracing animalism, weaken their arguments by allowing Don Marquis’ ‘future like ours’ argument for the immorality of abortion into the frame.
46
Donahue, Sean. "Knowledge exclusion and the rationality of belief." Analysis 79, no. 3 (2018): 402–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/any078.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Two epistemic principles are Knowledge Exclusion and Belief Exclusion. Knowledge Exclusion says that it is necessarily the case that if an agent knows that p, then she does not believe that ∼p, and Belief Exclusion says that it is necessarily the case that if an agent believes that q, then she does not believe that ∼q. Many epistemologists find it reasonable to reject the latter principle and accept the former. I argue that this is in fact not reasonable by proposing a case in which an agent can use that she has contradictory beliefs towards a proposition as decisive evidence for that proposition. A natural response is that this case conflicts with common assumptions about the relation between knowledge, contradictory beliefs and rationality. I reply by drawing ideas from Lasonen-Aarnio’s (2010) remarks on unreasonable knowledge to explain why these common assumptions do not threaten my argument.
47
Soleh, Achmad Khudori. "PENDEKATAN KUANTUM DALAM INTEGRASI AGAMA DAN SAINS NIDHAL GUESSOUM." ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 19, no. 1 (2018): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/ua.v19i1.4937.
Full textAbstract:
<p><em>There are various thoughts on the integration of religion and science, such as the model i‘jâz al-Najjâr, the model of Islamization of al-Faruqi, Ijmâlî Sardar, the Islamic science of Husein Nasr and the universal science of ‘Abd al-Salâm. According to Nidhal, those thoughts still have weaknesses and can not be developed so it needs another alternative. Therefore, Nidhal offers a quantum approach to the integration of religion and modern science. It is based on three principles: non-contradictory principle, layered interpretation principle, falsifiable-theistic principle. The first one is as a basis to integrate religion and science, the next is treated to understand and interpret the sacred text (Qur’an) as the basis of religion, the latest is to ensure the pattern applied in science. Based on these principles, where there is a "movement" connecting religion and science, both religion and science become possible to be reconciled.</em></p>
48
Manan, Munafrizal. "The Right of Self-Determination: Its Emergence, Development, and Controversy." Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 1 (2016): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/jk1211.
Full textAbstract:
This paper discusses the right of self-determinationfrom international law and international human rights law perspective. It traces the emergence and development of self-determination from political principle to human right. It also explores the controversy of the right of self-determination. There have been different and even contradictory interpretations of the right of self-determination. Besides, there is no consensus on the mechanism to apply the right of self-determination. Both international law and international human rights law are vague about this.
49
Steel, Emily J. "The Duplicity of Choice and Empowerment: Disability Rights Diluted in Australia’s Policies on Assistive Technology." Societies 9, no. 2 (2019): 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/soc9020039.
Full textAbstract:
The combination of choice as a contested concept and its increasing adoption as a policy principle necessitates a critical analysis of its interpretation within Australia’s reforms to disability services. While choice may appear to be an abstract and flexible principle in policy, its operationalization in practice tends to come with conditions. This paper investigates the interpretation of choice in the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), via an interpretive policy analysis of assistive technology (AT) provision. Analysis of policy artefacts reveals a diminishing influence of disability rights in favor of an economic discourse, and contradictory assumptions about choice in the implementation of legislation. The language of choice and empowerment masks the relegation of the presumption of capacity to instead perpetuate professional power in determining access to resources by people with disability.
50
Ørebech, Peter. "The Barents Sea 2010 Norway-Russia Border: The Triumph of the Negotiation Principle at the Expense of the Median- and Sector Line Pretentions." Yearbook of Polar Law Online 4, no. 1 (2012): 505–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116427-91000101.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The delimitation line that after 40 years of negotiation (2010) marks the offshore border between Norway and Russia is resulting from longstanding talks according to the negotiation principle as manifest in UNCLOS (1982) Article 74 and 83. Beyond the territorial sea the function of the median (equidistance)- and the sector line is nothing but diplomatic pretensions at the negotiation table. This article illustrates the demise of the sector line as a delimitation principle of the law of the sea in the Barents Sea. The reference point of the outcome of the negotiation is not geodetic nor geographic physical points, but simply the “half way solution” between two politically based claims, the sector line (Russia) and the median line (Norway). This solution is not contradictory to court practice.