Academic literature on the topic 'Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò)"
1
Loyen, Ulrich van. "Ambivalente Ausnahmedenker. Carlo Ginzburgs Studien zum «Nondimanco»." Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 13, no. 2 (2019): 125–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937-2019-2-125.
Full textAbstract:
Carlo Ginzburgs jüngstes Buch widmet sich zwei Autoren, die ferner von einander kaum gedacht werden können: dem Florentiner Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), der glaubte, die Fürsten führen zu können, indem er ihr Handeln als Staatskunst nobilitierte, und Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), der den «Gott der Philosophen» bekämpfte und den Eigennutz der kasuistischen Rede entlarvte. Machiavelli wurde zum Synonym für machtpolitischen Zynismus; Pascal zu einem Existenzialisten avant la lettre. Und doch führt Ginzberg die beiden unter der Konjunktion des «Nondimanco», des «Nichtsdestoweniger» zusammen, mit der im Principe (1532) allgemeine Charakterisierungen um die «Ausnahme» erweitert werden.
2
Langer, Christian. "The Political Realism of the Egyptian Elite: A Comparison between The Teaching For Merikare and Niccolò Machiavelli’s Il Principe." Journal of Egyptian History 8, no. 1 (August 24, 2015): 49–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340020.
Full textAbstract:
A comparison between The Teaching for Merikare and Niccolò Machiavelli’s Il Principe produces some astonishing results. While Machiavelli’s treatise is generally thought to be representative of the dawn of modern Western political realism, its essential properties are already present in Merikare. This includes the firm belief in strong authority, the fallibility of man, the need to appease the masses, and, if necessary, the demand to repress any developing threat to the power of the elite. In terms of the history of political thought Merikare is placed between the works of the moral realism of Greek philosophers like Plato and the political realism of Thucydides and Machiavelli. With the latter being heavily influenced by ancient authors, questions regarding the genesis of Greek political thought can be asked. It may well be that Greek political thought was, at least indirectly, influenced by Egyptian political thought.
3
Szczepanski, Jakub. "The Ruler Notes on Chapter XV, "Il Principe", by Niccolò Machiavelli." Studia z Historii Filozofii 12, no. 2 (July 16, 2021): 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2021.009.
Full text
4
Zhurbina, I. V. "REASON AS THE ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE OF STATE GOVERNANCE IN NICCOLÒ MACHIAVELLI’s DOCTRINE." Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy 32, no. 1 (March 29, 2022): 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-1-5-15.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses Niccolò Machiavelli’s doctrine of state governance as described in his treatise The Prince , which laid the foundations of the modern idea of governmentality (M. Foucault). The paper relies on the method of philosophical hermeneutics. Therefore, the (pre)supposition to base the study on and interpret The Prince is the assumption that Machiavelli defines rationality through the concept of the sovereign’s reason as the source of the state governance system. In this case, reason and/or intellect is understood as a personal quality of the sovereign mastered through knowledge, which makes all actions of the sovereign a meaningful action. Thus, state governance can be interpreted in terms of such universal categories of human thinking as prudence, reasonableness and wisdom. The paper shows that the sovereign acquires prudence through practical knowledge (geography, military art) and theoretical knowledge (history). Machiavelli suggests conducting an inner dialogue with historians to study history. A dialogue with historians develops the sovereign’s ability to ask the right questions (asking) and receive the necessary answers. The study finds that Machiavelli’s principle of rationality applies to the choice of advisers and the model of the relationship between the sovereign and the advisers. The sovereign, according to Machiavelli, is a person who knows how to listen to the advisers, but who makes a decision by himself. The study shows that reason acts as a principle that guides the activities of the sovereign, allowing him to make the right choice between stinginess and thrift, cruelty and mercy, people’s love and hatred, etc. The loss of power by the sovereign is seen as a manifestation of his unreason, i.e. the intellectual inability of the sovereign to think situationally and make a reasonable choice.
5
Lapčević, Milivoje. "Chronology of Niccolo Machiavelli's anthropological pessimism." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad 57, no. 3 (2023): 723–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns57-46852.
Full textAbstract:
The point of the article is to determine and consider the Niccolo Machiavelli's ideas about the human nature. N. Machiavelli believed that historical patterns repeat cyclically over the time. Therefore, the key to consideration hypotheses about the negative human nature, which is especially manifested in politics, was historical method. As the foundation of Machiavelli's theory is seen through a pessimistic view based on human nature, the genesis of this idea's development is revealed through chronology. The research focuses on several segments. First is presented the basic idea and assumption of human political nature in antiquity. The ideas of ancient thinkers are presented as an introduction to the thought of N. Machiavelli. A detailed account of the consideration of social life through the philosophical thought of Aristotle, shows the first ideas and explanation of the negative nature of people in politics. As the detailed historical method was the way of understanding N. Machiavelli's concretization of ancient ideas shows more clearly the way of thinking of anthropological pessimism. The Principe, as the key work N. Machiavelli's is considered through a comparative analysis with the rest of the writ ten legacy. After determining the thought of N. Machicavelli the entire idea of anthropological pessimism is linked to human rights and the chronology that follows the development of mechanisms for the protection of this set of rights. New facts and understanding of anthropological pessimism are presented as an opportunity for better acquaintance, but also for better normalization of relations within the framework of functioning of the social community
6
Vo, Thinh Chau. "Republican thought in Niccolò Machiavelli’s main political philosophy." Science and Technology Development Journal 19, no. 3 (September 30, 2016): 5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v19i3.486.
Full textAbstract:
Republican thought is Niccolò Machiavelli’s main political philosophy. This thought not only exists in his most important work named “Discorsi sopra la prima Deca di Tito Livio” but was also hidden in his masterpiece named “Il Principe”. This paper explores Niccolò Machiavelli’s republican thought in both of his above-mentioned works, particularly in “Discorsi sopra la prima Deca di Tito Livio”. Through specific evidences, the paper points out that republican government is Machiavelli’s most favourite political model, and the principality in his“Il Principe” is just his tactic solution or just his means to reach his ends which are to establish a republic in Italia.
7
Mayolla, Innoccentius Gerardo. "Kualifikasi Penguasa Ideal Telaah Filsafat Politik Machievelli Terhadap Tokoh Frank Underwood dalam Serial TV House of Cards." Forum 50, no. 1 (June 4, 2021): 62–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.35312/forum.v50i1.323.
Full textAbstract:
Salah satu serial TV populer di dunia adalah House of Cards. Serial TV bertemakan politik Amerika Serikat ini menarik perhatian banyak pihak karena memperlihatkan secara representatif dan transparan bagaimana politik AS yang sebenarnya terjadi. Melalui tokoh fiksi utama Frank Underwood, pemirsa menyadari bahwa politik bukan suatu yang dapat ditanggapi secara polos sebagaimana tampil dalam layar kaca. Frank Underwood sendiri memiliki persona seorang politisi yang pragmatis, licik, berani, seorang negosiator, orator dan diplomat ulung, tetapi juga sekaligus tak ragu bertindak kejam dan bengis untuk menumpas lawan politik demi mencapai tujuan dan ambisi kekuasaanya. Karakter Underwood ini sejalan dengan pemikiran filsuf dan diplomat besar Florence dan Italia, Niccolo Machiavelli. Dalam tulisan ini, penulis hendak meninjau dan menelaah filsafat politik Machiavelli dalam karya besar Il Principe (Sang Penguasa) terhadap tokoh fiksi serial TV ini, Frank Underwood. Metodologi yang penulis gunakan adalah studi literatur atas karya Machiavelli dan observasi mendalam atas serial TV House of Cards. Penulis menemukan adanya kesejajaran pandangan politik Machiavelli dan praksis politik yang dijalankan Underwood dalam kongres dan pemerintahan Amerika Serikat.
8
Pigoń, Jakub. "Helvidius Priscus, Eprius Marcellus, and Iudicium Senatus: Observations on Tacitus, Histories 4.7–8." Classical Quarterly 42, no. 1 (May 1992): 235–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800042725.
Full textAbstract:
‘E veramente quella sentenzia di Cornelio Tacito è aurea, che dice: che gli uomini hanno ad onorare le cose passate e ad ubbidire alle presenti, e debbono desiderare i buoni principi, e communque ei si sieno fatti, tolleragli’ – so Niccolò Machiavelli in 1531. Some four hundred years later a young Oxford scholar remarked: ‘that bad man, Eprius Marcellus, could have turned out a fine speech on the necessity for monarchy and tolerance, if we believe Tacitus – “ulteriora mirari, praesentia sequi; bonos imperatores voto expetere, qualescumque tolerare” (Hist. 4.8.2)’. It may be asked, however, to what extent the opinions of Eprius Marcellus (‘that bad man’) can be regarded as those of Tacitus himself; this is, beyond doubt, a part of a major question, i.e. to what extent the utterances of historical personalities can be seen as a means of conveying Tacitus' own judgements. It is not my intention here to deal with this large problem; rather, I think it useful to look more closely at the Tacitean passage as a whole: not only the speech of Marcellus but also that of Helvidius (to which it is a response) as well as the historical context of the affair. It is to be hoped that such examination will render the quest for the historian's own opinions a little less difficult.
9
Villa Prieto, Josué. "Crónicas urbanas e historiografía en la Toscana bajomedieval. Urban chronicles and Historiography in medieval Tuscany." Territorio, Sociedad y Poder 13, no. 13 (November 25, 2018): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.17811/tsp.13.2018.101-126.
Full textAbstract:
Este trabajo propone una aproximación a la historiografía urbana en Toscana durante la Baja Edad Media. Su cronística se interpreta como resultado de dos fenómenos: la consolidación de Florencia como autoridad política hegemónica en la región y como principal foco cultural del humanismo italiano. Cada epígrafe está dedicado a las historias realizadas sobre una ciudad concreta, interpretándose el contexto de su elaboración, la relación existente entre el autor y los hechos narrados, las características literarias de la obra, su contenido, y las posibilidades y límites que ofrecen para el conocimiento histórico. El catálogo de autores y obras incluye una tipología de las mismas en función de la cronología abordada (periodizaciones acotadas, historias universales y sucesos concretos). Asimismo se precisa los métodos y técnicas de elaboración histórica empleados por los cronistas, y sus esfuerzos humanistas en el tratamiento de las fuentes y por conseguir un estilo literario de inspiración clásica.The aim of this article is to offer a closest view of the urban chronicles made in the Toscana during the transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. The analysis is both historiographic and historic in order to achieve a better comprehension of these Works, taking into account the political evolution of the region and the cultural background that defines it. There for it must be kept in mind that during the Late Medieval Ages Florence gradually grows stronger as the govern authority within the region, as well as the main role in the Italian Humanism.Each one of the sections in this article studies one city. The first one studies the case of Florence, followed by the other cities in the Toscana: Arezzo, Pisa, Pistoia, Prat, San Miniato, Sienna (only city that stays away from the Florentine sovereignty, remaining as a republic) and Volterra. In each case it is studied the historic, institutional and cultural reality surrounding the redaction of the chronicles, the relation between the author and the facts he relates, the literary aspect of the chronicles, in addition its content is summarized, and finally the opportunities and boundaries that the chronicles can offer to the historic knowledge is valued.The chronicles are also classified attending to its characterization. A first differentiation appears when focusing into the way the chronicles deal with the information: some offer just statements that contain the news, with no explanatory recounting, in order to achieve objectivity (Annali Fiorentini, Annali Pisani, Annali Arretonirum); other are detailed essay containing the author’s most intimate feelings (Giovanni de Bonis, Baldasarre Boniaiuti, Antonio Ivani da Sarzana); and there are also Works that join together the explanatory narration with the transcription of public documents from the Comune (Giovanni Villani, Leonardo Bruni, Matteo Palmieri). In order to study this last type of chronicles its been followed the methodology by G. Arnaldi and M. Zabbia about the notary-chronicler, his academic education and notarial work, which leads them to act as attestor and to recount History based in reliable documentation.Another classification can be made according to the chronological period in each chronicle. The Universal Histories go back to the city founding during mythological era and ancient times; they have the most original historical conception, offering chronological frameworks, interpretations and purely humanistic styles (Ricordano Malispini, Baldasarre Bonaiuti, Giovanni Villano, Leonardo Bruni, Niccolò Machiavelli). On the other hand, the cronache cittadine focus in a very precise period and, mostly, contemporary to the writing (Bartolomeo di ser Gorello, Raniero Granchi, Gregorio Dati, Paolo di Tommaso Montauri, Domenico Buoninsegni, Sozomeno da Pistoia, Tommaso Fecini, Francesco Guicciardini). Finally, the ricordanze analyse a very specific and exceptional event (Alamanno Acciaioli, Luigi Guicciardini, Simone Peruzzi, Guccio Benvenuti, Antonio Ivani da Sarzana, Bastiano, Francesco Pezzati, Guasparri Spadari); belonging to this last group there are also some rhymed pieces (Carmen in victoriam Pisanorum, Ricordi di Firenze in 1459, Sacco di Prato de Stefano Guizzalotti). Besides all these chronicle types there are some others in the form of diaries and domestic chronicles (Ugolino di Niccolò Martelli, Matteo Castellani, Filippo Rinuccini).Finally the study focus in the methods and techniques used by the chroniclers in the elaboration of History. They make a record of what they see or know through probative testimonies (oral or written), valuing the document as a source for the elaboration of History. Besides the humanistic way in which the chroniclers handle the sources, they also make an effort to achieve a literary style of classic inspiration.
10
Rabac-Čondrić, Glorija. "Machiavellijeva komika i satira u demistifikaciji renesansnog morala." Radovi. Razdio lingvističko-filološki 8, no. 5 (April 17, 2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/radoviling.2364.
Full textAbstract:
Niccolò Machiavelli jedan je od. rijetkih renesansnih pisaca koji su u središte svojih razmišljanja stavili »pitanje velike politike«, tj. stvaranje novih država, konzerviranje i obranu organskih struk- tura u cjelini; pitanje diktature i hegemonije na širokom području, odnosno na cijelom državnom planu. On je ujedno i jedan od rijetkih Talijana koji se koristio komikom i satirom za razotkriva- nje osnovnih komponenata morala svog vremena. Međutim, Niccolò Machiavelli više je poznat kao autor Vladara (II Principe) nego kao literarni stvaralac. Prisutan u procesu velikih društvenih gibanja i poletnih tra- ganja za naučnim otkrićima. Machiavelli prati kao funkcionar Fi- rentinske republike političke igre, građanske bitke i unutarnja pre- strojavanja suvremenika. Pred njegovim očima rastu ambicije plutokratskih porodica i izbijaju kobni antagonizmi koji će razoriti Republiku i izazvati krizu političke etike i građanskog morala. Mada je rano napustio položaj u državnoj službi i usmjerio se na teo- retsko razrađivanje akutnih problema vladanja, ni u jednom tre- nutku svog života nije bio u stanju da se rastereti političkih pre- okupacija i suodgovornosti za sudbinu svoje države.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò)"
1
Hahn, Nancy A. "Machiavelli's Prince: A renaissance pasquinade." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 1996. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1264.
Full text
2
Llorca, Morell Blanca. "Experiencia e imitación en la obra de Maquiavelo. Las figuras políticas en la génesis del ottimo principe." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/289622.
Full textAbstract:
Esta tesis doctoral aborda el pensamiento de uno de los autores más célebres del Renacimiento, Nicolás Maquiavelo (Florencia, 1469-1527). Más concretamente, la atención se dirige al análisis de una serie de experiencias diplomáticas llevadas a cabo cuando era secretario de la segunda cancillería de Florencia (1498-1512). Entre las numerosas misiones y cometidos desarrollados entonces, resultan particularmente interesantes las legaciones mantenidas con cuatro personajes políticos de primera relevancia –César Borgia, el papa Julio II, el rey de Francia Luis XII y el emperador Maximiliano– pues éstos ejercieron una influencia capital a la hora de diseñar las directrices y estrategias de acción de El Príncipe. Este breve opúsculo ofrecido a los Medici como un útil manual de acción se nutre de los aprendizajes logrados durante los años de cancillería y establece una noción de la excelencia principesca que se inspira en el ejemplo de estas cuatro figuras. Es objetivo de las siguientes páginas rastrear cómo se fue forjando la noción maquiaveliana de excelente príncipe y en qué medida la influencia ejercida por estas cuatro figuras fue determinante.
Con este objetivo en mente, la tesis se articula en dos partes diferenciadas. Una primera que funciona como una introducción a los años de trabajo de Maquiavelo como secretario así como a la obra que comenzó a redactar nada más ser expulsado de su cargo, El Príncipe (destacando la dimensión preceptística del opúsculo, y estableciendo hipótesis sobre el arco temporal en el que fue compuesto y el destinatario al que va dirigido) y una segunda que constituye el auténtico nervio de la investigación. En esta segunda parte se aborda la influencia que las mencionadas figuras políticas tuvieron en la confección de la noción de ottimo principe que se formula en El Príncipe. Para ello se analiza, en primer lugar, el conjunto de las legaciones llevadas a cabo ante cada uno de los personajes citados; seguidamente, los escritos políticos en los que éstos tienen una presencia destacada; finalmente, la imagen de ellos dibujada en El Príncipe. El análisis comparativo de la presencia de estas cuatro figuras en el epistolario oficial y en los escritos políticos, por un lado, y en El Príncipe, por otro, revela que en el opúsculo Maquiavelo trabaja activamente por convertir a estas figuras en ejemplos máximamente persuasivos para alentar o disuadir al príncipe a seguir determinado curso de acción. Esta revalorización de los aprendizajes obtenidos durante los años de trabajo en la cancillería y la relectura crítica de El Príncipe atendiendo al papel que los ejemplos modernos juegan en su interior, muestra la influencia que el itinerario cancilleresco tuvo en la génesis del universo teórico maquiaveliano y arroja luz sobre el sentido político que Maquiavelo concedió a las experiencias que vivió como secretario.This dissertation examines the political thought of one of the most relevant authors of the Renaissance: Niccolò Machiavelli (Florence, 1469-1527). From 1498 to 1512 Machiavelli worked as a secretary in the Second Chancery of Florence, undertaking diplomatic missions which brought him face to face with some of the key figures of his time. The principal aim of this study is to analyse some of these missions and to link them with the picture of the «ottimo principe» that appears in The Prince. More specifically, this dissertation will focus on the influence that four figures (Louis XII, Maximilian I, Julius II and especially Cesare Borgia) had on Machiavelli’s works. Through the analysis of legations, letters and brief writings composed by Machiavelli before 1513, we can identify what he learnt by observing, interviewing and analysing these political figures and to what extent they had an influence on the genesis of the concept of «ottimo principe». The dissertation is divided in two parts. The first part is an introduction to Machiavelli’s work in the Chancery and to some important aspects of The Prince (including a discussion of the chronology and addressees of the book). The second part represents the core of this study and examines most of the legations carried out by Machiavelli from 1498 to 1512. The aim is to identify the portraits and descriptions he wrote of some political figures, to compare them with the portraits composed in The Prince and other works and to understand the reasons why he considers different aspects of the same individual. Special attention is given to Cesare Borgia, the most influential figure in order to illuminate the qualities of an «ottimo principe».
3
Marcocci, Giuseppe. "La coscienza di un impero: politica, teologia e diritto nel Portogallo del Cinquecento." Doctoral thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11384/86029.
Full text
4
Vikström, Dan. "Machiavelli’s virtú : Is virtú only for show?" Thesis, Umeå universitet, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-185321.
Full textAbstract:
Virtú has long been associated with manly traits like strength, cunning, valor, and ruthlessness. Much has been debated among these lines, whereas others have taken the approach of letting virtú and its meaning be undetermined. In this thesis a comparison between the different theoretical and practical meanings of Machiavelli’s teachings are discussed, with the conclusion being that there might be a case for virtú as being similar to showmanship, alternatively, an ingrained part of human nature. This conclusion is derived from comparison of different sources regarding Machiavelli’s works, with the Prince and the Discourses as the core of the interpretation. The flexibility of virtú and its circumstantial nature creates, through the arguments in this thesis, a basis for virtú as something other than a trait to have or to be developed. That being said, I am cautious to finalize a meaning to virtú, because of the nature of the word and its meaning. It has been interpreted to fit different subjective realities ever since its release, whereas this thesis might be found to do the same. Virtú and Machiavelli is hard to fully grasp, which makes it all the more interesting to try to derive meaning where none might be found.
5
Santos, Daniel William da Silva. "Machiavelli e Castiglione: reflexos do Speculum Princeps no apogeu do renascimento." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2009. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11823.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T17:27:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Daniel William da Silva Santos.pdf: 736281 bytes, checksum: 32a148fafc696dad08ac576fdcd21ed7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-09-30Secretaria da Educação do Estado de São Paulo
The present research seeks to investigate the disparity reasons that comes out between Il Principe, of Niccolò Machiavelli, and the Book Fourth by Il Cortegiano, of Baldassare Castiglione, which is about the indicated behavior for the governing class that is looking for possession and power exercise; a fact that put such books inside the same literature genres Speculum Princeps. This kind of genre also constitute a object of study through which it s possible to point out the reasons why, even having a common origin, the referred books end different perspectives for giving advices to the governing class. So, this distinction seems to be based on the different interpretations of theoretical elements among those that articulate in Speculum Princeps genre since The Old Age. Therefore, as this research intends to point out, what is created among the thoughts expressed by Machiavelli and Castiglione isn t a rupture, as its particularities would suggest, but a tension, due to the confront that these works allow to see certain contiguity
A presente pesquisa busca investigar as razões das disparidades que afloram do confronto entre Il Principe, de Niccolò Machiavelli, e o Livro Quarto de Il Cortegiano, de Baldassare Castiglione, no que concerne à conduta indicada aos governantes com vistas à posse e exercício do poder; fator em virtude do qual tais obras inscrevem-se igualmente no interior do gênero literário Speculum Princeps. Esse gênero, por seu turno, também constitui objeto de análise, por meio da qual é possível evidenciar as razões pelas quais, mesmo possuindo uma ascendência comum, as referidas obras encerram perspectivas distintas quanto ao aconselhamento dos governantes. Com efeito, tal distinção parece fundar-se nas diferentes interpretações dos elementos teóricos que se articulam na história do gênero Speculum Princeps desde a Antiguidade. Portanto, como o estudo ora empreendido pretende mostrar, o que se engendra entre as reflexões expressas por Machiavelli e Castiglione não é uma ruptura, como suas particularidades poderiam sugerir, senão uma tensão, posto que o cotejo de suas obras permite vislumbrar certa contiguidade
Books on the topic "Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò)"
1
1752-1825, Ridolfi Angelo, Foscolo Ugo 1778-1827, Carta Paolo, Del Vento Christian 1969-, and Tabet Xavier, eds. Scritti sul Principe di Niccolò Machiavelli. Rovereto: Nicolodi, 2004.
Find full text
2
Palazzo del Vittoriano (Rome, Italy), ed. Il principe di Niccolò Machiavelli e il suo tempo: 1513-2013. [Rome, Italy]: Treccani, 2013.
Find full text
3
Ratliff, Gerald Lee. Niccolò Machiavelli's The prince. Woodbury, N.Y: Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 1986.
Find full text
4
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Il Principe di Machiavelli: Testo manoscritto anonimo. Firenze: Centro editoriale toscano, 2006.
Find full text
7
1905-1983, Aron Raymond, and Melotti Franco, eds. Il principe. 9th ed. Milano: Rizzoli, 1986.
Find full text
8
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Il Principe. 2nd ed. Milano: Biblioteca universale Rizzoli, 1999.
Find full text
9
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Il Principe. Edited by Bettino Craxi. Torino: Mondadori, 1988.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò)"
1
König, René, and Hans Peter Thurn. "Der Principe oder Die Utopie des freien Italiens." In Niccolò Machiavelli, 182–210. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18838-6_8.
Full text
2
König, René. "Der Principe oder Die Utopie des freien Italiens." In Niccolò Machiavelli, 165–90. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28219-6_8.
Full text
3
Münkler, Herfried. "Machiavelli, Niccolò: Il principe." In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 1–3. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_15714-1.
Full text
4
Höntzsch, Frauke. "Niccolò Machiavelli: Il Principe, Blado: Rom 1532, 98 S. (dt.: Il Principe/Der Fürst, ital.- dt., übers. und hrsg. v. Philipp Rippel, Stuttgart 1986, 249 S.)." In Klassiker der Sozialwissenschaften, 11–14. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13213-2_1.
Full text
5
"9 Il Principe, Kapitel 24–26." In Niccolò Machiavelli: Der Fürst, 139–59. Akademie Verlag, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/9783050060507.139.
Full text
6
Skinner, Quentin. "Introduction." In Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction, 1–2. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198837572.003.0005.
Full textAbstract:
Niccolò Machiavelli died nearly 500 years ago, but his name lives on as a byword for cunning, duplicity, and the exercise of bad faith in political affairs. So much notoriety has gathered around Machiavelli’s name that the charge of being a machiavellian still remains a serious accusation in political debate. What lies behind the sinister reputation Machiavelli has acquired? Is it really deserved? What views about politics and political morality does he put forward in his major works? In order to understand Machiavelli’s doctrines, we need to begin by recovering the problems he evidently saw himself confronting in The Prince, the Discourses, and his other works of political thought.
7
Lynch, Christopher. "Conclusion." In Machiavelli on War, 285–90. Cornell University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501773020.003.0011.
Full textAbstract:
This concluding chapter begins by looking at two declarations from Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince and Discourses on Livy which imply that the single most needful thing is knowledge of how to shape human beings for, direct humam beings to, and guide human beings in war. Machiavelli's call to arms was meant to transform Florence, Tuscany, Italy, Europe, and the world. Central to his call was the idea of being the full possessor of one's own arms, an idea whose development made Machiavelli the chief harbinger of modern military thought. Ultimately, the identity of commanders as thinkers is the linchpin of Machiavelli's understanding of the relationship between war and politics. The identity of commanders as thinkers is also the conceptual linchpin between actual and spiritual warfare; Machiavelli sought through spiritual warfare to effect a fundamental transformation of human life. The chapter then briefly considers how Machiavelli's teachings helped establish the terms and framework of American constitutionalism.
8
Lynch, Christopher. "Unseen Enemy." In Machiavelli on War, 233–53. Cornell University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501773020.003.0009.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter reviews the narrative frame of Niccolò Machiavelli's Art of War. It considers how Machiavelli's chief difficulty as a writer is prefigured by the difficulties of the work's chief interlocutor, Fabrizio Colonna, the mercenary captain. Contrary to appearances, the Art of War is a carefully ordered whole and the ordering principle is the highly suggestive distinction between visible and invisible enemies and the equally suggestive identification of Fabrizio's difficulty with Machiavelli's. Machiavelli at least playfully presented or proposed some kind of war against the unseen but always feared God of the Bible. That Machiavelli conceived of his literary activity as intellectual warfare is suggested by his emphasis on war against an unseen enemy, his army's perpetual orientation to the symbolic home of the biblical God, its captaincy-in-speech by the young friends of his own literary circle, and by the movement of the army ever deeper into Eastern lands for a war of indefinite duration.
9
Winter, Yves. "25. Niccolò Machiavelli." In Rethinking Political Thinkers, 447–64. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198847397.003.0025.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter explores the ideas behind Niccolò Machiavelli’s two major political works, Discourses on Livy and The Prince. It starts by explaining how Machiavelli’s reception and biography highlight a correlation between his activities as Secretary of the Florentine chancery and his later theoretical work. Machiavelli’s philosophical thought primarily focused on power and the state; whereaa, his theory of history introduced the concepts of virtù (virtue) and fortuna (fortune). The chapter also outlines Machiavelli’s understanding of republican freedom in line with the significance of the conflict between the few and the many. Finally, it raises issues of violence, conquest, and empire correlating to Machiavelli’s theories.
10
Vergara, Camila. "Machiavelli on the Plebeian Power to Create and Punish." In Systemic Corruption, 125–43. Princeton University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691207537.003.0005.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter begins by presenting Niccolò Machiavelli's constitutional thought as the foundation of a type of constitutionalism that is material in its analysis of law and procedures, and anti-oligarchic in its institutional design. It recognizes the influence that socioeconomic inequalities exert over political power, in which Machiavelli embraces conflict as the effective cause of free government and strives to empower and channel emancipatory, plebeian energies through the constitutional order. It also focuses on Machiavelli's most important contribution to materialist constitutionalism: the plebeian nature of constituent power. The chapter contends that the constituent power in Machiavelli serves not as a bridge between basic principles and politics, but rather as the power exerted to resist oppression and establish plebeian and anti-oligarchic institutions. It looks at the democratic theory on the constituent power that has been conceived as the autopoietic power of the community.
Conference papers on the topic "Principe (Machiavelli, Niccolò)"
1
Neck, Reinhard. "POLITICS WITH AND WITHOUT ROMANCE: DANTE�S MONARCHIA VERSUS MACHIAVELLI�S IL PRINCIPE." In 9th SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH 2022. SGEM WORLD SCIENCE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscah.2022/s03.02.
Full textAbstract:
This paper contrasts Monarchia by Dante Alighieri with Il Principe by Niccolo Machiavelli. It is argued that the Principe not only incorporates the realities of politics but is also superior to the Monarchia as a scientific work because it avoids the latter�s commitment to scholastic philosophy and has greater empirical relevance and logical consistency. Moreover, it can serve to some extent as a role model for an approach to a positive analysis of politics even today.