Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Principle of an Effective Judicial Protection'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 26 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Principle of an Effective Judicial Protection.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Drake, Sara C. "The principle of effective judicial protection in actions for breach of community law before the national courts." Thesis, University of South Wales, 2000. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.323600.
Full textOrthmann, Mark. "Der Informationsanspruch zum Nachweis des Kartellschadens aus der Perspektive des Rechtsanwalts." Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Juristische Fakultät, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/17053.
Full textThe work reveals that a for a better private enforcement of competition law in the form of damages claims an independent right of information vis-à-vis the EU-Commission and the German Cartel Authorities for an attorney without a client and a mandate is needed. This need not only derives from the factual necessity but also from European primary law and the German Grundgesetz. In light of the European principle of effectiveness, Article 4 para. 3 TEU, and the right to effective judicial protection, Article 47 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 20 para. 3 German Grundgesetz respectively, the author develops the right and its boundaries. The examination of information rights and rights to access documents in EU secondary law and German law then shows that an independent right of information and access to documents for an attorney without a client and a mandate already exists if the law is interpreted in accordance with the EU primary law and the German Grundgesetz. The author further develops a recommendation as to how such an information right could be extended beyond its core that is determined by EU primary law and the German Grundgesetz.
Weingerl, Petra. "Effective judicial protection and damages in EU law : the case for the deterrent effect." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:a1660481-6d12-45aa-ba0b-6dbbae17e2f0.
Full textChristofi, Despina. "Effective judicial protection of bank depositors during the financial crisis and arbitration in an EU context." Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, 2018. http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/24012/.
Full textTorres, Zuñiga Natalia. "Justiciability of regressive measures of social rights. Some reflections about their judicial protection in Latin America." Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2015. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/115938.
Full textEl presente artículo tiene por propósito plantear una reflexión sobre la protección jurisdiccional que reciben los derechos sociales frente a la adopción de medidas regresivas en Latinoamérica por parte de los Estados, así como de los diversos grados de tutela jurisdiccional que aquellos reciben. El artículo desarrolla la noción de regresividad y los alcances del principio de prohibición de regresividad, así como la experiencia de las Cortes Constitucionales de Perú y Colombia y de los órganos el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en torno a la protección de los derechos sociales.
Rydén, Erik. "Exploring the Scope of Article 19(1) TEU: A New Horizon for the Enforcement of the Rule of Law in EU Member States?" Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-431684.
Full textMinot, Lilian. "Le juge administratif du référé-libéré et la protection effective des droits et libertés fondamentaux des administrés." Thesis, Dijon, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011DIJOD009.
Full textRegarding citizens’ effective protection in terms of fundamental rights and liberties, the administrative judge has, for a long time, been overshadowed by his judicial counterpart, because of a chronic ineffectiveness concerning urgency procedures. However, lawmakers have redressed that situation in particular by creating the “freedom summary procedure” which explicitly aimed at transforming the administrative judge into an actual custodial judge in the same way the judicial judge is for illegal administrative acts. In the ten years following that creation, the administrative judge has fully seized the opportunity to compete with the judicial judge thanks to a progressive and constructive judicial policy. This policy resulted in a significantly extended conception of the notion of “fundamental liberties” and in the appearance and development of injunctive actions to protect them. The range of liberties considered as fundamental as well as the consequent degree of their protection will undeniably serve the aim of a rise of the administrative judge to the rank of effective protector of the citizens’ fundamental rights and liberties
Gorigoitía, Abbott Felipe. "La Subsanación de los defectos procesales." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/94488.
Full textThis work is about the correction of the procedural defects in the Spanish civil procedure. It is based on the assumption that the correction is a priority mechanism to eliminate imperfections, over the invalidity or rejection, which is explained by the anti-formalist inspiration of the current procedural system and, at least with respect to the actions of part by the influence of effective judicial protection as a constitutional right. The research begins by situating historically and conceptually the correction. Then, it analyzes the correction within the context of the theory of procedural invalidity and concludes by studying its most important procedural aspects. The objective is to develop a systematic study of an institution that has acquired great practical importance, but has enjoyed little attention by the doctrine.
Andrade, José Undário. "A adequação do procedimento judicial ao caso concreto: reaproximação entre o direito material e o processo." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2014. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6607.
Full textThe present study has as its object the study of the power of the civil court and judges to tailor the procedure provided by law to the case. If one side of the legislator 's duty to create the necessary procedures for protection of the right materials provided abstractly, it seems necessary to understand that it is also given to the magistrate, and some uniquely contoured on a theoretical level, a related power so that it can perform precisely the same activity. We believe that this possibility is due to the Brazilian legal and constitutional system, which besides allowing the general control of the constitutionality of laws, including under the rules of procedure; expressed the need to reach the constitutional dictates of a timely judicial review and above all effective, it also has to be better suited to resolve the factual issues that are brought to the Judiciary. Was this attempted rapprochement between the substantive and procedural law, through the study of differentiated guardianships, as well as the principles of instrumentality and fungibility, which moved us to try to establish criteria for this adequacy is reached by the judge in his activity, preserved since the constitutional principles and parameters. That's what we intend to identify and propose
Este trabalho tem como objeto o estudo do poder do juiz cível de adequar o procedimento previsto em lei ao caso concreto. Se de um lado o legislador tem o dever de criar os procedimentos necessários à tutela do direito material abstratamente previsto, entendemos parecer necessário que seja também conferido ao magistrado, excepcionalmente e com alguns contornos definidos no plano teórico, um poder correlato para que ele possa realizar concretamente essa mesma atividade. Entendemos que essa possibilidade é decorrência do próprio sistema jurídico-constitucional brasileiro, que além de permitir o controle difuso da constitucionalidade das leis, inclusive, sob as regras de procedimento; expressa a necessidade de que para o alcance dos ditames constitucionais de uma tutela jurisdicional tempestiva e, sobretudo efetiva, tenha também ela de ser adequada para melhor resolver as questões fáticas que são postas ao Poder Judiciário. Foi essa tentativa de reaproximação entre o direito material o processo, passando pelo estudo das tutelas diferenciadas, bem como de princípios como o da instrumentalidade e da fungibilidade, que nos moveu a tentar estabelecer critérios para que essa adequação seja alcançada pelo juiz em sua atividade, desde que preservados os princípios e parâmetros constitucionais. É o que pretendemos identificar e propor
Schwaller, Émilie. "La protection des droits fondamentaux des entreprises en droit des aides d'Etat." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018STRAA019/document.
Full textIn the European Union, the need to better protect fundamental rights calls for research into finding a new balance between procedural fairness and efficiency. The thesis examines the impact of this phenomenon in State aid law which is characterized by its technical nature and its political sensitivity since it confers on the Commission the exclusive right to authorize or prohibit aids that Member States plan to grant to certain companies. Although these businesses are in principle recognized as legal persons in regards to fundamental rights, the State aid control is an exception since it offers almost no procedural guarantees during the administrative phase, often appears unpredictable to companies and maintains a standard of judicial control that could be considerably improved, both in terms of legality and enforcement. This observation argues for a reform that the study examines in the following lines of thought
Roig, Mateo Betlem. "Los casos inaudita parte." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Girona, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/406008.
Full textLa previsión legal que hace el legislador español sobre la ausencia en juicio es adecuada y proporcionada a la finalidad última de la misma que no puede ser otra que asegurar la plena garantía de los derechos de los que son partes en el proceso en todos los órdenes jurisdiccionales. A esta conclusión es posible llegar no solamente después de estudiar la legislación procesal española existente en la materia sino también examinando la regulación procesal que sobre el mismo particular realizan otros estados europeos. En las resoluciones que se examinan en esta tesis doctoral, algo más de cuarenta, es dable apreciar el criterio fijado por el Tribunal Constitucional y también por el Tribunal Supremo en materia de requisitos que deben reunir los actos de comunicación para que se consideren debidamente realizados y garanticen así los derechos de las partes en el proceso y sobre todo del ausente. Otra de las cuestiones capitales de esta tesis es lo relativo a los casos en los que se realizan entregas de nacionales ante el requerimiento efectuado por otro estado en uso de mecanismos de cooperación jurídica internacional, tanto casos de extradición como de Ordenes Europeas de Detención y Entrega, deteniéndome en especial en éste último supuesto y examinando alguna de las resoluciones del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos que en esta materia destacan. La Decisión Marco 2009/299 se erige como un mecanismo de eficacia fundamental para superar los problemas que produce en ocasiones la referida entrega y en definitiva, el reconocimiento mutuo de resoluciones dictadas sin la comparecencia en juicio de la persona afectada.
Le, Soudéer Mathieu. "Le contrôle du respect des droits fondamentaux par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne en matière de procédures applicables aux pratiques anticoncurrentielles." Thesis, Paris 2, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020056.
Full textThe judicial control of fundamental rights, in the field of EU antitrust proceedings, has developed in a context characterized by the increasing importance ofthe repressive side and the diversification of procedures serving the enforcement of EU provisions applying to anticompetitive conducts. Besides, the protection of fundamental rights has become an unavoidable imperative within the EU legal order.The EU courts are expected to cope with two main challenges.The first one is essentially procedure-oriented and lies in the way the various procedures applying to articles 101 and 102 TFUE are to be legally carried on and combined. The EU judicature is supposed to reconcile, on the one hand, the protection of fundamental rights that strengthen the fairness of procedures and, on the other hand, the quest for procedural efficiency. In that respect, the progressive enhancement of the protection of stakeholders' rights does not completely compensate for the priority still granted to the objectives of efficiency and effectiveness. The second one rather is of an institutional nature and regards the respect of the structural requirements stemming from the right to a fair trial. The upholding ofthe current institutional system that provides the EU Commission with substantial powers depends on the capabality of the control exerted by the EU courts to meet certain requirements in terms of completeness and intensity. Thus, a fundamental principle appears to be the initial driving force of a significant strengthening of the judicial control. Moreover, fundamental rights have proven to be instrumental in enabling the EU judges to deploy an in-depth and objective control
Couronne, Vincent. "La compétence procédurale des États-membres de l'Union Européenne." Thesis, Paris 1, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA010260/document.
Full textProcedural autonomy is a term often misused when talking about the very real phenomenon “judicial subsidiarity”. It is more accurate to talk in terms of competence considering the principle of subsidiarity regulates the role they play between Member States and the Union. As such, when discussing judicial subsidiarity in relation to the procedural aspects of implementing EU law, one should talk about procedural competence. This change in meaning ultimately leads to a revision of all relevant case law. Such a review brings to light a number of elements that, when juxtaposed, reveal an overarching rationale behind the Court's rare law. First, both equivalence and effectivity, long perceived as regulators of procedural competence national judges, are not in fact principles but criteria. Furthermore, they are not the only regulating criteria as the right to an effective judicial protection also comes into play. It then becomes apparent that effectivity is an obstacle to EU law having primacy over national law. Moreover, for a long time the ECJ has taken into account requests made by Member States to, on occasion, bypass the criteria of effectivity. As such, the ECJ accepts that national identity can serve as corrective justification of the very content of effectivity. In other words, Member States can put forward more and more arguments in the name of “public interest” to justify non-compliance with EU law effectivity
Villanueva, González Martín. "SUNAT: Torpedeando a la Marina Mercante Nacional." Derecho & Sociedad, 2015. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/117147.
Full textEn el presente artículo, el autor describe los problemas por los que viene atravesando las empresas navieras peruanas debido a las equivocadas interpretaciones que realiza la Administración Tributaria acerca de los alcances de la Ley de reactivación y promoción de la Marina Mercante Nacional; a los perjudiciales procedimientos de cobranza de deudas tributarias, y al deficiente sistema de solución de controversias suscitadas entre los contribuyentes y la Administración Tributaria.
Núñez, del Prado Chaves Fabio. "Demystifying myths: Economic analysis of double hearings in the Peruvian civil process." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2015. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/108752.
Full textDentro del proceso civil peruano, existen garantías que buscan la protección de los derechos de las personas que acuden al mismo.Estas garantías, al estar consagradas en laConstitución peruana y en tratados internacionales sobre derechos humanos, son con-sideradas derechos fundamentales. Una de ellas es la doble instancia.El presente ensayo es una crítica constructiva al principio de doble instancia. La hipótesis que se sustenta consiste en acreditar a través de un análisis económico que la doble instancia no cumple una función en nuestro sistema jurídico.
Dávila-Suárez, Carlos-Mario. "La formation du contrôle juridictionnel de l’administration en droit colombien et l’influence du droit français : essai sur les obstacles à l’accès à la justice contentieuse-administrative et sur la protection effective des droits des administrés." Thesis, Paris 2, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA020004.
Full textThe French origins of Colombian administrative law and administrative judicial procedure is a common place among Colombian jurists. They claimed a strong influence from French legal culture in South American countries. However, it is necessary to analyze this hypothesis to determine the scope of such an influence. The present study will attempt to provide an answer, explaining the formation and development of the judicial review of public administration in Colombia, between latest nineteenth century and the present times. This will allow us to study the judicial and scholars’ Colombian legal transplants from French administrative law doctrine of the latest nineteenth and earlies twentieth century. Thus, this research is focus in two aspects. First, the formal aspect linked with the concept of administrative-judges, independent from executive branch, its technique, structure, and methods. And second, the substantive aspect based on remedies and judicial procedure from administrative law (including nullity, nullity and restauration of the breeder's right, Judicial Review of Government Contracts Disputes, and direct reparation). The main objective of this work is to structure and systematize Colombian administrative law, identifying the serious problems of access to administrative justice and rights protection
Lamblém, Gláucia Aparecida da Silva Faria. "Execução coletiva dos direitos difusos, coletivos e individuais homogêneos reconhecidos em sentença face à efetividade da tutela jurisdicional." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2015. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6713.
Full textThis study has the purpose of examining the limits of applicability of the procedural rules of the Code of Civil Procedure related to the execution of sentence in class action lawsuits. This is done through a reinterpretation of the constitutional principles of the process, from the perspective of maximum effectiveness of collective judicial protection because of the own protected material right. Considering that the effectiveness of judicial protection is closely connected to the implementation of judicial decisions, the topic is addressed in the context of execution of sentence in class actions for protection of diffuse, collective, and homogeneous individual rights. It is highlighted the judge's role in the fair adequacy of such rules to the concrete case. The study of execution of sentence under the collective jurisdiction is justified, since this leads the judicial decision to an end, being able to assess the practical impact of judicial protection. In this sense, the mass society and conflicts arising from it, allows violation to a plurality of rights, involving large numbers of subjects, thus requiring legal responses in accordance with the complexity of the factual situation. It is taken into account that the judicial response should not adhere to generic directions, requiring, therefore, the effective implementation of its controls, otherwise giving rise to the ineffectiveness of judicial protection. The theme of execution of sentence, interpreted in a broad sense, as all judicial decisions, shows fertile ground to scale the role of the judge and the influence of the executive mechanisms available on existing standards for the effectiveness of collective judicial protection. The examination of integrative rules of collective procedural microsystem, combined with those of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to the enforcement of court decisions and being in line with the constitutional principles of the process enables a true adequacy of the executive procedure in class actions such as to provide the effectiveness of collective judicial protection. In this context, the judge s role is essential to the effectiveness of judicial protection, not being limited to enforce the law and pronounce judgment on the merits, but to the exercise of a power of execution aimed to give effect to his/her own decisions
O presente estudo tem por objetivo analisar os limites da aplicabilidade das normas procedimentais do Código de Processo Civil pertinentes à execução de sentença às ações coletivas, a partir de uma releitura dos princípios constitucionais do processo, sob a ótica da máxima efetividade da tutela jurisdicional coletiva, em razão do próprio direito material tutelado. Considerando que a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional está intimamente ligada à concretização das decisões judiciais, o tema é abordado no âmbito das execuções de sentença coletiva para tutela de direitos difusos, coletivos e direitos individuais homogêneos, destacando a atuação do juiz na justa adequação dessas regras ao caso concreto. Justifica-se o estudo da execução de sentença no âmbito da jurisdição coletiva, uma vez que esta leva a termo a decisão judicial podendo aquilatar a repercussão concreta da tutela jurisdicional. Neste sentido, a sociedade de massa e os conflitos dela decorrentes, possibilitam a lesão a uma pluralidade de direitos, envolvendo um grande número de sujeitos, requerendo, portanto, respostas judiciais condizentes com a complexidade da situação de fato. Leva-se em consideração que a resposta judicial não deve ficar estagnada a comandos genéricos, exigindo-se, portanto, a implementação efetiva dos seus comandos, sob pena de inefetividade da tutela jurisdicional. A temática da execução de sentença, entendida esta de forma ampla, como toda decisão judicial, mostra-se um terreno fértil para dimensionar o papel do juiz e a influência dos mecanismos executivos disponibilizados nas normas existentes para a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional coletiva. O exame das normas integrativas do microssistema processual coletivo, conjugadas com aquelas do Código de Processo Civil atinentes à execução de sentença, em consonância com os princípios constitucionais do processo permite uma verdadeira adequação do procedimento executivo nas ações coletivas de tal forma a conferir a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional coletiva. Neste contexto, o papel do juiz é essencial para a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional, não se limitando a aplicar a lei e pronunciar o juízo de mérito, mas também ao exercício de um poder de execução tendente a conferir eficácia às suas próprias decisões
Icle, Virginia. "A morosidade da prestação jurisdicional e a efetivação do direito fundamental à razoável duração do processo: construindo alternativas possíveis." Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, 2010. http://www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/3995.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2015-06-24T18:22:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 VirginiaIcleDireito.pdf: 919455 bytes, checksum: 652d8c36d0e378644606e95ab56970b0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-10-27
Nenhuma
A proposta em desenvolver os processos judiciais sem dilações indevidas deve ser desenvolvida mediante práticas que estejam em concordância com os ditames Constitucionais. Para a concretização da tutela jurisdicional, é necessário que tais práticas, além de estarem em conformidade com a segurança do ordenamento jurídico e, capazes de efetivarem o direito fundamental a razoável duração do processo, contribuam, de forma efetiva, com os objetivos traçados pela Constituição. A audiência preliminar será investigada como um instrumento processual capaz de evitar dilações indevidas no decorrer dos processos, seja mediante a possibilidade de conciliação entre as partes, seja por meio do saneamento do processo. Permite a participação mais ativa dos agentes do processo, através do uso da oralidade. Neste sentido, compõe um sistema processual dinâmico, permitindo o “acesso à justiça” em sentido amplo, contemplando ao povo, a adjetivação de cidadão e difundindo a democracia participativa como proposta de Estado a ser adotada para a sociedade contemporânea. Nesse contexto, se pode vislumbrar que o dispositivo do art.331 do Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro, contribui com a efetividade do direito fundamental à razoável duração do processo, objetivando a redução da demora processual injustificável. Para tanto, cabe aos magistrados utilizarem-se de uma interpretação hermenêutica dos ditames constitucionais conjugada com os fatores externos que irão influenciá-lo. A problematização em questão pretende estudar a sociedade no momento atual, onde anseia pela consagração do direito fundamental ao processo em tempo razoável, o qual deve ser promovido por parte do Estado, já que o mesmo lhe consagrou constitucionalmente com o advento da EC 45/2004. Nesse contexto, cabe ao Estado responder pela demora injustificada dos tempos processuais. E a reparação deve manifestar-se através da indenização em favor do cidadão que teve seu direito tolhido, por conseqüência de um ato estatal, ou, no caso da audiência preliminar, sua inércia.
The proposal to develop the judicial procedures without undue delay should be developed through practices that are in accordance with the constitutional dictates. For the completion of judicial review, it is necessary that such practices, and comply with the safety of the legal system and able to enforce the fundamental right to a reasonable duration of the process, contribute, effectively, to the goals set by Constitution. The preliminary hearing will be investigated as a procedural tool that will prevent undue delays during the process, either through the possibility of conciliation between the parties, either through the restructuring process. Allows more active participation of the process’s, through the use of orality. In this sense, forms a dynamic procedural system, allowing "access to justice" in a broad sense, covering the people, the adjective of citizen participatory democracy and spreading as a proposed rule to be adopted to contemporary society. In this context, we can see that the machinery of article 331 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, contributes to the effectiveness of the fundamental right of a reasonable duration of the process, aiming at the reduction of procedural delay unjustifiable. For this, use it to judges is a hermeneutic interpretation of constitutional principles coupled with external factors which will influence him, adopting the theory as formalism evaluative procedures. The questioning concerned intends to study the society at present, which yearns for the consecration of the fundamental right to process in reasonable time, which should be promoted by the state, since the constitutionally enshrined it even with the advent of constitutional emendment 45/2004. In this context, the State must answer for the undue delay of the procedural time. And the repair should be manifested through indemnity in favor of the citizen who had checked his right, as a consequence of a state act, or, if the preliminary hearing, his inertia.
Forster, Ninon. "La responsabilité sans faute de l’Union européenne." Thesis, Paris 2, 2019. https://www-stradalex-eu.passerelle.univ-rennes1.fr/fr/se_mono/toc/RESFAUE.
Full textOften invoked in actions for damages before the Court of Justice of the European Union to overcome obstacles to the engagement of the European Union's extra-contractual liability, nofault liability is a vague concept whose definition, nature and very existence are contested. However, the study of this concept, based on the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, reveals an original Praetorian construction based on the influence of national laws on public liability. Liability without fault has acquired, with the judgments of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, a consistency which makes it appear to be a legal category comprising several liability regimes in which proof of wrongful activity by the institutions of the European Union or its agents is not necessary to engage in non-contractual liability. However, no-fault liability is hardly an effective legal remedy available to individuals because of the judge's reluctance to expressly recognize it as a principle of extra-contractual liability and because of the rigorous interpretation of the conditions of its validity
エウニセ, アラス モレノ ナンシー, and Nancy Eunice Alas Moreno. "私企業に対する租税優遇措置等の裁判所による統制の研究 : アメリカ、スペイン及びメキシコの比較制度研究." Thesis, https://doors.doshisha.ac.jp/opac/opac_link/bibid/BB13115595/?lang=0, 2019. https://doors.doshisha.ac.jp/opac/opac_link/bibid/BB13115595/?lang=0.
Full textThe mechanisms for controlling fiscal assistance vary from one country to another. Legislative, executive and judicial controls can be mentioned as broad examples of these mechanisms. This research will focus on the judicial control of fiscal expenditure in the United States of America, Spain and Mexico. It primarily examines in which cases financial expenditure on the private sector is declared unconstitutional or illegal and in which situations it is declared constitutional or legal by the American, Spanish and Mexican judiciary. It will also focus on an investigation of the legal requirements for fiscal stimulus, as well as in the judging criteria developed and used by the court of those countries to reach to those conclusions.
博士(法学)
Doctor of Laws
同志社大学
Doshisha University
Silva, Pedro Miguel Amaral. "A tutela jurisdicional efectiva dos particulares contra actos administrativos da União Europeia." Master's thesis, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90310.
Full textEste estudo e dissertação pretendem abordar algumas questões essenciais que, não raras vezes, são esquecidas aquando da análise dos meandros da Construção Europeia, designadamente os crescentes problemas advindos da gradual afirmação da União como grande Administração europeia, directa e centralizada por contraponto à administração indirecta dos Estados-membros.Neste labor, um problema em concreto sobressai, a saber, aquele que se prende com uma das questões quintessenciais dos nossos dias: o acesso à justiça, em particular à Justiça Administrativa.Nessa senda há que aprofundar, seriamente, o Princípio da Tutela Jurisdicional Efectiva, procurando encontrar as suas raízes e perceber o seu papel e preponderância no âmbito da União. Só assim poderemos invocá-lo como garantia prima facie dos particulares europeus face ao Direito, Instituições e, principalmente, face à acuação administrativa da UE.Para tal haveremos de contestar as soluções estabelecidas, questionando o papel do TJUE e os meios processuais ao seu dispor, bem como a legitimidade activa estabelecida nos Tratados, muito concretamente aquela que é plasmada aos particulares europeus.No escrutínio académico que pretendemos levar a cabo, impõe-se, designadamente, analisar os embaraços sentidos a nível processual e garantístico, tal como as soluções que actualmente se têm proposto mas que, no entanto, o são apenas em aparência, como sejam a rede de tribunais nacionais dos Estados-membros, ou a proposição da acção de responsabilidade por danos causados pela União.Neste seguimento, deitaremos mãos ao vasto catálogo de jurisprudência do TJUE, juízo tantas vezes sobranceiro na interpretação e moldagem do Direito originário Europeu, na tentativa, não só, de diagnosticar o mais fielmente possível o problema, mas também encontrar e propor as melhores e mais competentes soluções para o resolver.
This study and dissertation aim to address some key issues that are often overlooked when analysing the particularisms of the European Construction, predominantly, the growing problems stemming from the gradual assertion of the Union as a large European direct and centralized administration, in counterpoint to the indirect administration of Member States.In that work, a concrete problem stands out, namely, one that is related to one of the quintessential questions of our days: the access to justice, particularly the Administrative Justice.In this way, the Principle of an Effective Judicial Protection must be deepened, in search not only of its roots but also the role it plays within the Union. This is the only way we can rely on it as a real guarantee of European individuals against the Law, Institutions, and administrative activity of the EU.To do so, we will have to challenge the established solutions. That’s only possible by questioning the role of the CJEU, the procedural means at its disposal, as well as the locus standing established for them in the Treaties, specifically the one granted to European individuals.To undertake the academic scrutiny we intend, we need not only to analyse the procedural and guarantee-related embarrassments this problem generates, but also the solutions currently being proposed, such as the network of national courts of the Member States, or the action of compensation for damage caused by the Union, which are, nevertheless, solutions only in appearance.In order to do this, we will lay hands on the vast catalogue of jurisprudence of the CJEU, a judgment so often vital in the interpretation and shaping of European law. That will help us not only to diagnose the problem as faithfully as possible, but also to find the best and most competent remedies to solve it.
Rivera, Eva. "Procesně právní aspekty mediace v právu ES." Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-311812.
Full textGouveia, Catarina Sofia Espírito Santo. "O Novo Regime Jurídico do Processo do Inventário (Lei n.º 23/2013, de 5 de Março). Problematização e questões de (In) competência." Master's thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/83855.
Full textAtravés da Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 172/2007, de 6 de Novembro, prevê-se a desjudicialização do processo de inventário, pretendendo-se que este processo decorresse fora dos tribunais judiciais, dada a morosidade da sua resolução definitiva. Na verdade, devido aos sucessivos diplomas legais aprovados pela Assembleia da República, nesta matéria, criou-se um grande tumulto legislativo, suscitando alguma instabilidade quanto à correcta interpretação e aplicação das disposições legais presentes nos diplomas legais que antecederam a Lei n.º 23/2013. Desta forma, é necessário analisá-los para percebermos quais as verdadeiras e significativas alterações entre os vários regimes, percebendo quais os principais objetivos que visava o legislador. O novo Regime Jurídico do Processo de Inventário, consagrado na Lei 23/2013, encontra-se, ainda, num estado não muito clarificado, suscitando algumas dúvidas quanto à sua interpretação e aplicabilidade. Desta forma, iremos, numa primeira abordagem, proceder a uma análise de toda a tramitação do processo de inventário para que possamos definir quais as suas novidades em relação aos anteriores regimes, quais os principais objetivos do legislador, e por ultimo, tentar de alguma forma esclarecer algumas dúvidas que possam surgir na aplicabilidade do próprio regime jurídico. Na presente lei, o legislador optou pela transferência das competências dos juízes para os notários, afirmando-se este ultimo como a figura central do processo de inventário. Ora, importa saber o que acarreta esta alteração de competências, fazendo algumas questões pertinentes, de forma a tentar perceber qual o real papel do notário e do juiz e dos tribunais no presente regime jurídico.
Council of Ministers Resolution No. 172/2007, of 6 November, provides for the misjudgment of the inventory process, and it is intended that this proceeding be carried out outside the judicial courts, given the lengthy resolution of its final resolution. In fact, due to the successive legal acts approved by the Assembly of the Republic, in this matter, a great legislative turmoil has been created, provoking some instability as to the correct interpretation and application of the legal dispositions present in the legal texts that preceded the Law no. 23 / 2013. In this way, it is necessary to analyze them in order to perceive the real and significant changes between the different regimes, realizing the main objectives that the legislator aimed at.The new Legal Regime of the Inventory Process, enshrined in Law 23/2013, is also in a state not very clear, raising some doubts as to its interpretation and applicability. In this way, we will, in a first approach, analyze the whole process of the inventory process so that we can define what is new in relation to the previous regimes, what are the main objectives of the legislator, and finally, try to somehow clarify some doubts that may arise in the applicability of the legal regime itself.In the present law, the legislator chose to transfer the powers of the judges to the notaries, the latter being the central figure in the inventory process. It is important to know what this change of powers entails by asking some pertinent questions in order to try to understand the real role of the notary and the court and the courts in the present legal regime.
Freire, Andreia Sofia Raposo. "Relatório de Estágio Curricular no Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores Secção de Família e Menores de Ponta Delgada, Ilha de São Miguel." Master's thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/97556.
Full textO presente relatório de estágio foi realizado com base no período de quatro meses passados no Tribunal de Família e Menores de Ponta Delgada. Tendo em conta as particularidades deste tribunal senti-me, desde logo, interessada pelo trabalho que decorria “por trás das cortinas” de todos os relatórios que quase todos os dias chegavam à mão do magistrado para seu conhecimento e que tinham um papel fundamental na sua decisão. Tornou-se óbvio, desde o início, que neste tribunal, para além de se trabalhar com leis, trabalhava-se com a vida das pessoas, e com todas as implicações que isso acarreta. Assim, pretende-se, para além de dar conhecimento das atividades realizadas ao longo do estágio, fazer um enquadramento normativo e concreto das funções, atividades e trabalhos dos Técnicos de Assessoria Multidisciplinar de Apoio aos Tribunais.
Cunha, Manuela João Araújo da. "A tutela jurisdicional efetiva dos particulares no contencioso da União Europeia: o recurso de anulação como realidade jurídica (ou ilusão prática?)." Master's thesis, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/64065.
Full textA expressão “Cortina de Ferro” ficou popularizada pelo político britânico Winston Churchill para descrever a política de isolamento lançada pela União Soviética durante a Guerra Fria, aludindo à barreira imaginária, mas quase palpável, que dividia a Europa em dois blocos. Não se afigurará desproporcionado que nos apropriemos de tal metáfora para ilustrar a barreira existente entre os recorrentes particulares e o Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia no âmbito dos recursos de anulação intentados ao abrigo do artigo 263.º do Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da União Europeia, isto porque apesar de também esta não ser uma barreira fisicamente edificada e visível a olho nu – como fora a fronteira histórica erguida através do muro de Berlim –, nem por isso deixa de se fazer sentir como tal. O recurso de anulação tem-se revelado um desafio exigente. Destinado à fiscalização da legalidade dos atos emanados pela União, quando tal decorre da iniciativa dos particulares (e nos casos em que eles não são os destinatários), faz depender essa possibilidade de condições cerceadoras, designadamente as da afetação direta e individual, e bem assim da necessidade de provar a afetação direta perante os atos regulamentares que não careçam de medidas de execução, determinando que se questione a efetividade do acesso dos particulares à justiça da União. Por fazerem descer a tal “cortina” – tão aparentemente simples de levantar, mas, na prática, quase sempre impenetrável –, aqueles critérios estão precisamente na génese da rejeição da maioria das ações de anulação intentadas por pessoas singulares e coletivas. É este o legado de uma orientação jurisprudencial (aparentemente mais do que consolidada) que impera desde a década de sessenta e que traduz a visão afunilada dos tribunais da União. Essa postura em nada se pode coadunar com uma União que se diz “de Direito” e que repousa, entre outros, na realização do princípio da proteção jurisdicional efetiva, erguido sob a bandeira de um sistema dito completo, coerente e multiforme de vias de recurso instituído pelos Tratados a fim de assegurar uma concretização plena do direito da União.
The term "Iron Curtain" became popularized by the British politician Winston Churchill to describe the isolation policy launched by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, alluding to the imaginary, yet almost palpable barrier that divided Europe into two main blocs. It does not seem disproportionate for us to use such a metaphor to illustrate the barrier between the private applicants and the Court of Justice of the European Union in actions for annulment brought under the Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. That is because although this is also not a physically built up barrier visible to the naked eye – as was the historic frontier erected through the Berlin Wall –, it does not cease to be felt as such. The action for annulment has proved to be a demanding challenge. Designed to ensure judicial review of the legality of European Union acts, when triggered by private applicants (and if the act is not addressed to them), this possibility is dependent on restrictive conditions, namely those of direct and individual concern, as well as on the need to prove direct concern when seeking the annulment of a regulatory act that does not entail implementing measures, leading to questioning the effectiveness of private individuals' access to judicial review. By bringing down such a "curtain" – so apparently simple to raise but in practice almost always impenetrable –, the classic understanding on those criteria is precisely the reason of the rejection of the majority of actions for annulment brought by natural and legal persons. This is the legacy of the (seemingly more than consolidated) jurisprudential orientation that has been in force since the 1960s, which translates the narrowed view of the Court. This attitude cannot be in any way compatible with a European Union that is called a "Union of law" and which is based on, inter alia, the observance of the principle of effective judicial protection erected under the banner of a complete, coherent and multiform system of remedies established by the Treaties in order to ensure full realization of the European Union’s Law.
Ziegler, Friedrich. "Consumer protection law in the ongoing European internal energy market by the example of the Electricity Directive 2009/72/EC." Doctoral thesis, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-342336.
Full text