Academic literature on the topic 'Principle of separation of powers'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Principle of separation of powers.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Principle of separation of powers"
Bagratyan, Bagrat. "The Principle of Separation of Powers in Political Science." WISDOM 1, no. 6 (July 1, 2016): 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i6.70.
Full textMerrill, Thomas W. "The Constitutional Principle of Separation of Powers." Supreme Court Review 1991 (January 1991): 225–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/scr.1991.3109603.
Full textZvesper, Jhon. "The Separation of Powers in American Politics: Why We Fail to Accentuate the Positive." Government and Opposition 34, no. 1 (January 1999): 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1999.tb00468.x.
Full textKosař, David, Jiří Baroš, and Pavel Dufek. "The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism." European Constitutional Law Review 15, no. 3 (September 2019): 427–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019619000336.
Full textŞaramet, Oana. "EXECUTIVE POWERS IN RELATIONS WITH THE PARLIAMENT. PART I." Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences 9, no. 4 (February 3, 2016): 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v9i4.2322.
Full textTurkaeva, Laura. "Implementation problems and development trends of the principle of powers separation." Current Issues of the State and Law, no. 14 (2020): 180–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2020-4-14-180-186.
Full textTrajkovska-Hristovska, Jelena. "The Features of the Modern Concept of Separation of Powers as an Element of Constitutionalism - “The Garden of Eden” or “The Dark Side of the Moon ”?" Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, no. 2 (July 2018): 104–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2018.21.2.104.
Full textGoncharov, Vitaly Viktorovich, Iurii S. Shpinev, Diana I. Stepanova, Oleg N. Malinovsky, Sergey A. Balashenko, and Jacek Zalesny. "Separation of powers as a principle of organization and activities of executive authorities in the Russian Federation." LAPLAGE EM REVISTA 7, no. 2 (May 10, 2021): 510–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202172819p.510-518.
Full textГрабенвартер, Кристоф, and Kristof Grabenvarter. "SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE INDEPENDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS." Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 1, no. 6 (February 7, 2016): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/17101.
Full textRuzanov, Ilia Vladislavovich. "Independence of the Judiciary in the Modern Understanding of the Separation of Powers." Russian Journal of Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (December 15, 2019): 89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/rjls18474.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Principle of separation of powers"
Delmas, Candice. "Liberalism and the Worst-Result Principle: Preventing Tyranny, Protecting Civil Liberty." unrestricted, 2006. http://etd.gsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07272006-153910/.
Full textTitle from title screen. Andrew Altman, committee chair; Christie Hartley, Peter Lindsay, committee members. Electronic text (88 p.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed May 2, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 80-88).
Kim, Kiyoung. "Best Practices for Constitutional Government Under the South Korean Framework of Democratic Experimentalism." ScholarWorks, 2018. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5736.
Full textBrusokienė, Ivona. "Teismų ir teisėjų nepriklausomumo principas konstitucinėje jurisprudencijoje." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2011. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2011~D_20110207_111331-82971.
Full textThe principle of court and judges is quite old and it has been studied by many authors but this topic is current nowadays as well. The justice supported by judges is often being tried to be influenced as well as frequent disciplinary proceedings show that inner independence of judges is not purified to a perfect form. The provisions of the Constitution which govern the independence of courts and judges are analyzed in the study together with Constitutional Court rulings that are connected with the principle of the independence or courts and judges. As the independence principle of courts and judges is the basic one in the constitutional law it is fortifies in many international documents. The provisions of international documents that regulate the independence of courts and judges are discussed in the study. They are compared to the provisions that are fortified in the Constitution of Lithuania. Besides, the data of sociological researches is used in the study in order to see the level of the trust of the public in courts. The hypothesis is raised in the study that the level of independence of courts and judges influence the public trust in the courts ad judges was confirmed. The higher level of the independence of courts and judges appears the bigger trust of public in courts and judges is. The principle of power division, the ratio of court’s authorities with other authorities (legislature and executive power) as well as the features of the court power are distinguished... [to full text]
Ottoni, Sibilla. "Principe de proportionnalité et droit de la concurrence." Thesis, Paris 2, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA020047.
Full textJudicial review of antitrust authorities’ decisions shows as extremely variable. This justified an effort of theoretical explanation and demanded the elucidation of several intermediate questions. The technical nature of the economic subject accounts for a specific institutional model (the independent agencies one), a given type of norms (through standards and indeterminate concepts), a peculiar form of discretionary power (defined mixt: both pure an technical). Considering all these elements, we defined the ideal reach of judicial review. The first element, the independent nature of authorities, dictates to wonder on the boundaries between confrontational administration and trial, but also on the boundaries between administration and politics. The second element, related to the structure of the norm, provokes a reflection on the necessity that the administration completes the legal prescription while applying it, somehow participating to the definition of her own power’s legitimacy requirements. The third element recalled, the mixt nature of discretionary power, led to redefine the reasons of the analogy between jurisdictional control on opportunity and on technical administrative evaluations. The instrument used to carry out the described analysis is the principle of proportionality, tool of administrative action but also instrument of judicial review, that permitted to reveal the affinity between administrative and jurisdictional paradigms that founds the observed uncertainties
Le, Bot Fabien. "Le principe de l'équilibre institutionnel en droit de l'Union européenne." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020107.
Full textThe principle of institutional balance has been used by the European Court of Justice in order to solve conflicts between European institutions about the distribution of powers. This dissertation elaborates a legal definition of the principle. This first includes an approach of its scope of application. The study of the functions of institutional balance in the Court’s caselaw allows understanding the normative impact of this principle. It is a general principle of law which applies to all institutions and organs having a role in the decision-making procedures established by the Treaties. As a structural principle, institutional balance is useful to understand the institutional system of the EU as a whole. It could be used by the Court in amore systematic way and applied to new issues of institutional law, brought for instance by the Lisbon Treaty. The new distinction between legislative acts, delegated acts and executive acts offers new grounds for legal hostilities that the principle could help to solve. As a general institutional principle, institutional balance can be compared to the principle of separation of powers and understood as a founding principle of the European Union political regime
Kordeva, Maria. "Le principe de la séparation des pouvoirs en droit allemand : étude doctrinale et jurisprudentielle." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014STRAA033.
Full textThe thesis focuses on the german constitutional case law and doctrine relating to the principle of the separation of powers. The analysis of the problems concerning the meaning of the rule deducted under article 20 paragraph 2 of the German Basic Law of 23 May 1949 point up its practical application today. The interpretation of the solutions of the Federal Constitutional Court constitues the main part of this research however it is impossible to globally appreciate and understand the principle of the separation of powers without make the necessary effort to explain its genesis in the german constitutionnal law. Ergo, the theories of the Vormärz also the thought of the legal scolars of the Empire and the Weimar Republic are an important key stage that permit to grasp the present form of the principle in the decisions of the judge. The functional justice or the theory of the substantial decision complete the definition of the constitutional separation of powers. The concretisation of these integral elements of the principle create the system of checks and balances that govern the conflicting relations between legislative, executive and judicial powers
Issa, Rafael Hamze. "O controle judicial dos atos normativos das agências reguladoras." Universidade de São Paulo, 2015. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-16062015-154504/.
Full textThe object of the current thesis is to discuss the judicial control of the normative activity of the regulatory agencies according to Brazilian law. This paper is divided into three parts. At first, the evolution of the principle of the separation of powers across the Nineteenth and the Twentieth century will be analyzed, as well as the reception of such principle in the early Twenty-one century, especially due to the process of disengagement of the State from the direct intervention in the economy (as a provider of services to the citizens) and its replacement as a regulator of economic activities. Also in the first part, it will be analyzed how such economical and social changes caused a modification of the role of the Judiciary branch which, initially, was created as the less active of the State powers, becoming the central body for the effectiveness of the contemporary democracy rights. The second part analyzes the normative activity of the regulatory agencies, with the defense of the thesis of legislative delegation, as well as with the verification of the procedural and material requirements that must be observed by the regulatory agencies in the issuance of normative rulings and how such requirements end up limiting the discretion of the regulatory bodies. In the third part the verification of the judicial control of such regulation is carried out, having as its premises the adoption, by Brazilian law, of the unity of jurisdiction system and the functional differences between the Judiciary branch and the Public Administration in the establishment of public policies, being defended that the judicial control of the regulatory agencies normative rulings must be made in a negative manner, i.e., without the Judiciary having the competence for the stipulation of the regulatory policy to be followed, as well as in a responsive manner, i.e., with the analysis of the consequences of the judicial control over the regulated sector, being the magistrate responsible for analyzing not only the aspects of legality of the questioned normative rulings, but also the objective of the regulated system and the impacts of the judicial decision on it.
Machado, Edinilson Donisete. "Decisão judicial sobre políticas públicas: limites institucionais democráticos e constitucionais." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2006. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7215.
Full textnenhum
The analysis of concrete situations that admit resolution of difficult cases of public policies demonstrates a great complexity, whose comprehension requires the study of Institutions and patterns adopted constitutionality. The attribution of competence, its limitation and the exercise of the Political Power, represented by the principle of separation of powers, are important for the resolution and comprehension of these cases. In this context, the judicial decision of public policies promotes questions about the attribution of competence and their limits to the Jurisdictional Function. It is possible to observe that the judicial decision happens in a distinct way by the Juridical Positivism and by the denominated Post-positivism. By the doctrinaire and jurisprudence analysis, we intend to demonstrate that the Jurisdictional Function does not possess democratic legitimacy for the political options. Thus, we have concluded that the competence to promote the decisions of public policies depends of the choice of the model and of the democratic arrangements. The Constitutional text has established real limits to the legislator function by the Fundamental Rights. The ordainment opening for the moral topics in the decisions about the public policies is not possible for the Jurisdictional Function, considering that Judges are irresponsible democratically and can not take political decisions. By the democratic Institution point of view, they are limited by the options contained in the Constitution and as interpreters of the ordainment they are united to the equality principle
A análise de situações concretas, que comportam resolução de casos difíceis de políticas públicas, demonstra uma grande complexidade, cuja compreensão demanda o estudo das Instituições e dos modelos adotados constitucionalmente. A atribuição de competência, sua limitação e o exercício do Poder Político, representado pelo princípio da separação de poderes, são importantes para resolução e compreensão desses casos. Neste contexto, a decisão judicial de políticas públicas promove questionamentos sobre a atribuição de competência e seus limites à função jurisdicional. Observa-se que a decisão judicial se dá de forma distinta pelo positivismo jurídico e pelo que se convencionou chamar de pós-positivismo. Busca-se, por meio da análise doutrinária e jurisprudência, demonstrar que a função jurisdicional não possui legitimidade democrática para as opções políticas. Conclui-se que a competência para promover as decisões de políticas publicas depende da escolha do modelo e dos arranjos democráticos. O texto Constitucional impõe limites substanciais à própria função legiferante, por meio dos Direitos Fundamentais. A abertura do ordenamento às pautas morais nas decisões sobre políticas públicas não é possível à Função Jurisdicional, tendo em vista que os Juizes são irresponsáveis democraticamente e não podem tomar decisões políticas. Pela ótica de Instituição democrática, os juízes estão limitados pelas opções contidas na Constituição e, enquanto interpretes do ordenamento, estão cingidos ao princípio da igualdade
Armstrong, Kris A. "The Separation Principle – A Principle for Programming Language Design." University of Toledo / OhioLINK, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1373382351.
Full textBambaci, Juliana. "Presidential discretion in separation of powers systems /." May be available electronically:, 2007. http://proquest.umi.com/login?COPT=REJTPTU1MTUmSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=12498.
Full textBooks on the topic "Principle of separation of powers"
United, Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (7th 1985 Milan Italy). Basic principles on the independence of the judiciary. [New York]: United Nations, Dept. of Public Information, 1988.
Find full textGerangelos, Peter A. The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process: Constitutional principles and limitations. Oxford: Hart Pub., 2009.
Find full textUnited, Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders ((7th 1985 Milan Italy). Basic principles on the independence of the judiciary. (New York): United Nations, Dept. of Public Information, 1988.
Find full textTommasino, Paolo. Task-space Separation Principle. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0353-1.
Full textVance, Mary A. Separation of powers: Monographs. Monticello, Ill., USA: Vance Bibliographies, 1987.
Find full textSeparation of powers in practice. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2004.
Find full textAralar, Reynaldo B. Separation of powers and impeachment. 2nd ed. Mandaluyong City: Published and exclusively distributed by National Book Store, 2004.
Find full textConstitutionalism and the separation of powers. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998.
Find full textKusamotu, 'Gboyega. Nigerian federalism and separation of powers. Ibadan, Nigeria: Sulek-Temik Pub., 2001.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Principle of separation of powers"
Ceccherini, Eleonora. "The Principle of Separation of Powers in Crisis: Intergovernmental Relations in Comparative Perspective." In The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain, 125–35. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27717-7_8.
Full textBashirov, Agamirza E. "Separation Principle." In Partially Observable Linear Systems Under Dependent Noises, 129–58. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8022-0_5.
Full textGenovese, Michael A., and Robert J. Spitzer. "Separation of Powers." In The Presidency and the Constitution, 23–57. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403979391_3.
Full textSmith, Raymond A. "Separation of Powers." In The American Anomaly, 41–58. Fourth Edition. | New York: Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351034821-4.
Full textAlder, John, and Keith Syrett. "The separation of powers." In Constitutional and Administrative Law, 138–62. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60907-6_7.
Full textRyan, Mark. "The separation of powers." In Unlocking, 79–119. 4th edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019. | Series: Unlocking the law: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315652610-5.
Full textBarnett, Hilaire. "The Separation of Powers." In Constitutional & Administrative Law, 79–96. Twelfth edition. | Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315458373-6.
Full textAlder, John. "The separation of powers." In Constitutional and Administrative Law, 136–60. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-47492-6_7.
Full textBarnett, Hilaire. "The Separation of Powers." In Constitutional & Administrative Law, 79–96. 13th edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429322686-4.
Full textBarber, N. W. "The Separation of Powers." In The Principles of Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808145.003.0003.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Principle of separation of powers"
Cheng, Pau-Chen, Kevin Eykholt, Zhongshu Gu, Hani Jamjoom, K. R. Jayaram, Enriquillo Valdez, and Ashish Verma. "Separation of Powers in Federated Learning (Poster Paper)." In SOSP '21: ACM SIGOPS 28th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3477114.3488765.
Full textBakaveckas, Audrius, and Rolandas Kriksciunas. "REGULATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA." In 8th SWS International Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES - ISCSS Proceedings 2021. SGEM World Science, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2021/s02.05.
Full textQaui, Bouhania, and Latrish Ismaiel. "Political Governance in the Light of the Constitutional Amendment in Algeria and the Mechanisms of Political Reform (Organizing Powers as a Model)." In REFORM AND POLITICAL CHANGE. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdiconfrpc.pp13-25.
Full textShasivari, Jeton. "THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS AND REAL IMPLEMENTATION." In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017. Stef92 Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/12/s02.096.
Full textKalashnikova, Victoria. "The constitutional principle of the separation of powers and the problems of its implementation in the Russian Federation." In Actual problems of jurisprudence 2022. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02089-0/083-088.
Full textHasan Salameh, Muamar. "The Principle of Separation of Powers between Sharia and the Positive Law: a Case Study on the Constitutional System of Saudi Arabia." In 1st International Conference of Law and Justice - Good Governance and Human Rights in Muslim Countries: Experiences and Challenges (ICLJ 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iclj-17.2018.3.
Full textZinoviev, V. E. "THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION OF POWER CIRCUIT IN THE ADAPTIVE FRICTION CLUTCHES." In STATE AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS OF AGRIBUSINESS Volume 2. DSTU-Print, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/interagro.2020.2.235-239.
Full textFedorov, Roman, and Dmitry Pixin. "On the question of the independence of the judicial branch in the theory of separation of powers." In Current problems of jurisprudence. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02058-6/252-258.
Full textKhartabil, H. F. "Review and Status of the Gen-IV CANDU-SCWR Passive Moderator Core Cooling System." In 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone16-48741.
Full textRudenko, Valentina. "Anti-Corruption Policy, the Constitution, and Human Rights in Poland." In The Public/Private in Modern Civilization, the 22nd Russian Scientific-Practical Conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 16-17, 2020). Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.35853/ufh-public/private-2020-23.
Full textReports on the topic "Principle of separation of powers"
Duffy, James F. Separation of Powers in Classifying International Agreements. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada441348.
Full textGrossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman. Separation of Powers and the Budget Process. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12332.
Full textBrodeur, Abel. Reproduction of 'Can International Courts Enhance Domestic Judicial Review? Separation of Powers and the European Court of Justice'. Social Science Reproduction Platform, January 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.48152/ssrp-0eeh-d577.
Full textThallapally, Praveen K., and Denis M. Strachan. Initial proof-of-principle for near room temperature Xe and Kr separation from air with MOFs. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1122332.
Full text