Relevant bibliographies by topics / Principles of Beauchamp and Childress

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Principles of Beauchamp and Childress'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2025
Last updated: 1 August 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Principles of Beauchamp and Childress.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Principles of Beauchamp and Childress"

1

Rolf, Sibylle. "Respekt vor Patientenautonomie und Achtung der Menschenwürde." Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik 52, no. 3 (2008): 200–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.14315/zee-2008-0306.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The study investigates the »Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics« published by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress (1979, 52001) with a particular concern for the principle of respect for autonomy. The leading question is in which philosophical background autonomy is dealt with by Beauchamp/Childress and by the enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant, while the more emipirical theoretical framework of Beauchamp/Childress and the rationalistic framework of Kant are being analyzed. After having considered the foundation of autonomy both in Beauchamp/Childress and Kant, the study turns to
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rose, M. "Further Development of Beauchamp and Childress’ Theory Based on Empirical Ethics." International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (IJCPT) 2, no. 5 (2013): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.19070/2167-910X-1300016.

Full text
Abstract:
The American ethicists Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress developed a framework of four ethical principles which are useful to analyze ethical complex cases in biomedicine. These four principles are respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Beauchamp and Childress believe that their approach to manage ethical difficult cases is cross cultural i.e. that it can be used in different cultures such as American, European, and Asian cultures. However, some of their critics claim that the framework of the four principles is American in nature and for this
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Schröder, Peter. "Ein vier-Prinzipien-Ansatz für die Bioethik." Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik 51, no. 3 (2007): 182–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.14315/zee-2007-0304.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The four-principles-approach of Tom Beauchamp and Jim Childress has been very influential in bioethics in the last decades. It has proven well although mid-level principles in general and this approach in particular are highly contested by ethicists who would prefer approaches rather based on rules, virtues or personal relations. The author of this study systematically discusses the origin, method and criticism of the Beauchamp and Childress approach. Finally he argues that the applicability of this approach for ethical challenges in the biomedical setting should stimulate a principle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Shea, Matthew. "Forty Years of the Four Principles: Enduring Themes from Beauchamp and Childress." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 45, no. 4-5 (2020): 387–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa020.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This special issue commemorates the 40th anniversary of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress’s Principles of Biomedical Ethics with a collection of original essays addressing some of the major themes in the book. It opens with intellectual autobiographies by Beauchamp and Childress themselves. Subsequent articles explore the topics of common morality, specification and balancing of moral principles, virtue, moral status, autonomy, and lists of bioethical principles. The issue closes with a reply by Beauchamp and Childress to the other authors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Garcia, Jorge L. A. "Virtues and Principles in Biomedical Ethics." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 45, no. 4-5 (2020): 471–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa013.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In the seventh and most recent edition of their classic book, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Tom Beauchamp and James Childress define a virtue as a character trait that is “socially valuable and reliably present” and a moral virtue as such a trait that is also both “dispositional” and “morally valuable” (2013, 31, 377). The virtues that they single out as “focal” within biomedical ethics are compassion, discernment, trustworthiness, integrity, and conscientiousness (Beauchamp and Childress, 2013, 37–44). Not all is well in their treatment of virtue. Beauchamp and Childress seem to w
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Trotter, Griffin. "The Authority of the Common Morality." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 45, no. 4-5 (2020): 427–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa015.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In the third and subsequent editions of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Tom Beauchamp and James Childress articulate a series of ethical norms that they regard as “derived” from, and hence carrying, the “authority” of the common morality. Although Beauchamp and Childress do not claim that biomedical norms they derive from the common morality automatically become constituents of the common morality, or that every detail of their account carries the authority of the common morality, they regard these derived norms as provisionally binding in a way that does not apply to the norms of me
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Veatch, Robert M. "Reconciling Lists of Principles in Bioethics." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 45, no. 4-5 (2020): 540–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa017.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In celebration of the fortieth anniversary of the publication of Beauchamp and Childress’s Principles of Biomedical Ethics, a review is undertaken to compare the lists of principles in various bioethical theories to determine the extent to which the various lists can be reconciled. Included are the single principle theories of utilitarianism, libertarianism, Hippocratism, and the theories of Pellegrino, Engelhardt, The Belmont Report, Beauchamp and Childress, Ross, Veatch, and Gert. We find theories all offering lists of principles (or the equivalent) numbering from one to ten. Many o
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bladt, Tara, Thomas Vorup-Jensen, Eva Sædder, and Mette Ebbesen. "Empirical Investigation of Ethical Challenges Related to the Use of Biological Therapies." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 3 (2020): 567–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073110520958883.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to investigate the ethical dilemma of prioritising financial resources to expensive biological therapies. For this purpose, the four principles of biomedical ethics formulated by ethicists Tom Beauchamp and James Childress were used as a theoretical framework. Based on arguments of justice, Beauchamp and Childress advocate for a health care system organised in line with the Danish system. Notably, our study was carried out in a Danish setting.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sande, Jonathan R. "Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Tom L. Beauchamp , James F. Childress." Journal of Religion 71, no. 1 (1991): 117–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/488564.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Beckwith, Francis, and Allison Krile Thornton. "Moral Status and the Architects of Principlism." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 45, no. 4-5 (2020): 504–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa019.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In this article, we discuss Beauchamp and Childress’s treatment of the issue of moral status. In particular, we (1) introduce the five different perspectives on moral status that Beauchamp and Childress consider in Principles of Biomedical Ethics and explain their alternative to those perspectives, (2) raise some critical questions about their approach, and (3) offer a different way to think about one of the five theories of moral status (the theory based on human properties) that is more in line with what we believe some of its leading advocates affirm.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Principles of Beauchamp and Childress"

1

Waltho, Simon. "A genealogical critique of Beauchamp and Childress' for principles approach to medical ethics." Thesis, Cardiff University, 2010. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/54192/.

Full text
Abstract:
<bold>Part Three</bold> examines the development of Beauchamp and Childress 'four principles' approach to medical ethics from the 1<super> st</super> to the 6<super>th</super> Editions of <italic>Principles of Biomedical Ethics,</italic> arguing that it has, thanks to changes in the authors' conception of philosophical moral theory, been able to productively incorporate the views of many of its critics over this time; that it is also able to incorporate features of different ethical approaches such as virtue ethics, narrative ethics and ethics of care; and that, properly understood, it continu
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Smith, Nicholas. "Private Rule Following and the Principle of Respect for Autonomy." Ohio University / OhioLINK, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1429884767.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Karlsson, Josefine. "Experimentet med människor som spelpjäser : En etisk analys av Vipeholmexperimentet utifrån Beauchamp och Childress fyra etiska principer." Thesis, Jönköping University, HLK, Ämnesforskning, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-53832.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this essay is to investigate the ethical issues that permeated the carbohydrate experiment that was going on at Vipeholm's hospital for "uneducable insane" in Sweden. The material about the experiment is taken from Elin Bommenel's dissertation The Sugar Experiment: The Caries Experiments 1943–1960 at Vipeholm Hospital for the Insane. To create understanding, Beauchamp and Childress´s four ethical principles, which are used as ethical guidelines in health care, were used in the analysis of the experiment. The four principles are the principle of nonmaleficence, the principle of respe
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Martins, Isabel Otilia Parreiral Pinheiro de Matos. "A operacionalização dos princípios da Bioética no principialismo de Beauchamp e Childress." Master's thesis, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/10612.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Filosofia<br>Na sexta edição obra Principles of Biomedical Ethics, como nas edições anteriores, Beauchamp e Childress apresentam-nos uma análise detalhada de cada um dos princípios prima facie centrais no debate bioético, assim como os problemas éticos que cada um desses princípios envolve, e propõem um modelo para as situações morais mais difíceis, onde se verifiquem conflitos entre princípios. Tendo em consideração a complexidade da aplicação concreta de cada um dos princípios propostos, proc
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

García, Cubillos Alejandro. "Autonomía, consentimiento y eutanasia : en el principalismo de Beauchamp & Childress y en derecho penal." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2013. http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129685.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nwaishi, Casmir Chibuike. "The Intimate Connection Between Autonomy and Decision-Making in Applied Health Care Ethics." Thesis, Linköping University, Centre for Applied Ethics, 2004. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2402.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>The intimate connection between autonomy and decision-making in applied health care, especially in various kinds of consent and refusal has taken center stage in medical ethics since the Salgo decision in 1957. Prior to that time, the physician’s supposedly moral duty to provide appropriate medical care typically surpassed the legal obligation to respect patient’s autonomy. The Salgo decision concluded that physicians have a legal duty to provide facts necessary for the patient to make an informed decision. "The doctor knows best" long ago was replaced with "The doctor proposes; the patient
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Onuoha, Chikezie. "Bioethics Across Borders : An African Perspective." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis : Universitetsbiblioteket [distributör], 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7844.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ebbesen, Mette. "The Golden Rule and Bioethics. A Reflection upon the Foundation of Ethics." Thesis, Linköping University, Centre for Applied Ethics, 2002. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-1474.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>The object of this thesis is the foundation of ethics. The question is whether there exists a universal core to ethics consisting of a fundamental ethical principle across cultures. This principle could for example be the so-called Golden Rule, which goes as follows: ‘You should do to others what you want them to do to you’. The Golden Rule is to be found in many of the world’s religions and is also reflected in secular society. The rule can for example be found in a political version in legal declarations e.g. the Humans Rights Declaration of 1948. There are philosophersand scientists who
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

De, Roubaix J. A. M. (John Addey Malcolm). "n Postmoderne uitdaging aan die 'paradigmale biomediese etiek model' met verwysing na kompleksiteitsteorie." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/52965.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (MPhil)--University of Stellenbosch, 2002.<br>ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Introduction From the postmodern ethical perspective [the postmodernist would say Jrom the ethical perspective], there is something suspicious and inherently unethical in a system of ethics supported by a comprehensive, cohesive and universal metanarrative, a set of fixed and unbending ethical rules and laws, without the ready possibility of revision [Cilliers, 1998, pp.114, 137-140; Cilliers, 2001, p. 3; Cilliers, 1995, p.125]. Based on the ideas of especially Winkler [1993, pp. 343-365] I have concluded that conte
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gonçalves, Patrícia Trindade. ""Matar" vs "deixar morrer": critérios de distinção e análise de Beauchamp e Childress em "Principles of Biomedical Ethics"." Master's thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/25112.

Full text
Abstract:
A dicotomia “matar”/”deixar morrer” tem sido a mais utilizada para separar moralmente a actuação médica nas situações de fim de vida. Se “matar” é tradicionalmente visto como um acto proibido, “deixar morrer” pode, em determinadas circunstâncias, ser um comportamento moralmente admissível. Ao longo do tempo foram propostos vários critérios de diferenciação que permitissem distinguir moralmente as duas situações. Veremos quais foram, os pressupostos em que assentam e as críticas de que foram alvo. Seguidamente, analisaremos a forma como Beauchamp e Childress abordam esta questão na sua obra de
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Principles of Beauchamp and Childress"

1

F, Childress James, ed. Principles of biomedical ethics / Tom L. Beauchamp, James F. Childress. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Arras, John D., James Childress, and Matthew Adams. Principlism. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190665982.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter provides a survey and critical evaluation of the theory of principlism, as expounded by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in their increasingly authoritative work The Principles of Biomedical Ethics (editions 1979, 1983, 1989, 1994, 2001, 2009, 2013). It explains the main elements of the theory and how Beauchamp and Childress’s conception of principlism evolved through different editions of their book, as they assimilated their responses to criticisms into an increasingly expansive account. The chapter ends with a discussion of two criticisms of principlism that remain outstanding
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Carlin, Nathan. Pastoral Aesthetics. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190270148.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
It is often said that bioethics as a field began in theology during the 1960s but that it became secular during subsequent decades, yielding to other disciplines and professions such as philosophy and law, because it was felt that a neutral language was needed to provide a common ground for guiding clinical practice and research protocols. This common ground was provided by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in their The Principles of Biomedical Ethics—an approach that became known as principlist bioethics. Pastoral Aesthetics recovers a role for religion in bioethics by providing a new perspec
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Arras, John. Methods in Bioethics. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190665982.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
This book provides an overview and critical discussion of the main philosophical methods that have dominated the field of bioethics. The first three chapters outline some influential theories that are important to understanding the methodological approaches that follow. Chapter 1 offers a survey of the theory of principlism as expounded by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, chapter 2 examines Bernard Gert’s defense of common morality, and chapter 3 discusses the so-termed new casuistry. The next three chapters trace a historical dialectic. Chapter 4 explores the shift that has increasingly occ
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rhodes, Rosamond. The Trusted Doctor. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190859909.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Common morality has been the touchstone for addressing issues of medical ethics since the publication of Beauchamp and Childress’s Principles of Biomedical Ethics in 1979. This book challenges that reigning view by presenting an original account of the ethics of medicine. It begins by demonstrating why the standard common morality accounts of medical ethics are unsuitable for the profession and inadequate for responding to the uncommon issues that arise in medical practice. It then explains medicine’s distinctive ethics in terms of the trust that society allows to the profession. Starting with
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Arras, John D., James Childress, and Matthew Adams. A Common Morality for Hedgehogs. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190665982.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter is an exposition and assessment of Bernard Gert’s arguments for a conception of common morality as the keystone of ethics. It begins by outlining the moral rules, ideals, and decision procedures that Gert defines as constitutive of the content of common morality. It explains how Gert’s appeal to common morality differs from the role that it plays in the work of Beauchamp and Childress. The chapter then canvasses two objections to Gert’s position. The first raises doubts about whether his description of the content of common morality is accurate, particularly given that it is not s
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Arras, John D., James Childress, and Matthew Adams. One Method to Rule Them All? Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190665982.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter considers the method of reflective equilibrium, and how it has been used in the context of debates in bioethics. It uncovers the method’s origins in the work of John Rawls and explores how it came to be adopted by Beauchamp and Childress as the unifying method of bioethics. After distinguishing between narrow and wide versions of reflective equilibrium, the chapter proceeds to discuss some problems with the view. The preliminary difficulty that is raised about wide reflective equilibrium in particular is that it is too comprehensive and indeterminate to be useful in bioethics. The
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Beauchamp, Tom L. The Theory, Method, and Practice of Principlism. Edited by John Z. Sadler, K. W. M. Fulford, and Cornelius Werendly van Staden. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732365.013.31.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter explains and defends the theory and methods of principlism as a theoretical approach to biomedical ethics. Principlism is not merely a framework of four principles; it is a method for using these principles in practice. I discuss their practical roles in biomedical ethics, with a focus on psychiatric ethics. I start with a history of the use of principles in bioethics and then turn to the nature and commitments of the framework of four clusters of principles that James Childress and I defend. Also analyzed is the central place occupied in principlism by common morality theory—the
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Principles of Beauchamp and Childress"

1

SCHÖNE-SEIFERT, BETTINA. "DANGER AND MERITS OF PRINCIPLISM Meta-theoretical Reflections on the Beauchamp/Childress- Approach to Biomedical Ethics." In Bioethics in Cultural Contexts. Springer Netherlands, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4241-8_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dalhaus, Laura, and Heinz Giesen. "Die Sicherstellungsbörse nach Beauchamp und Childress." In Operation am offenen System. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47124-8_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ignovska, Elena. "Mandatory Vaccination Against COVID-19 in Europe: Public Health Versus ‘Saved by the Bell’ Individual Autonomy." In European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40801-4_18.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe text aims to reconcile the bioethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice) (Beauchamp TL, Childress JF in Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, 2009) with the principles used by legal institutions (primarily, the European Court of Human Rights) to evaluate possible human rights infringements due to mandatory vaccination against Covid-19 (legality, necessity, proportionality and legitimate aim) (This is the so-called ‘structural approach’ that the ECtHR follows when considering interferences of the qualified right and is also s
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Smajdor, Anna, Jonathan Herring, and Robert Wheeler. "The four principles." In Oxford Handbook of Medical Ethics and Law, edited by Anna Smajdor, Jonathan Herring, and Robert Wheeler. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199659425.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter explores the four principles developed in the seminal book by Beauchamp and Childress. The four principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance and justice) are explained and examples provided of how they operate in principle. There is a discussion of the difficulties faced when these principles appear to clash with each other.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lemma, Alessandra. "Bioethical Principles." In First Principles. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780192858962.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This chapter introduces the dominant model used in bioethics today: the Four Principles approach as described by Beauchamp and Childress. It provides a succinct overview of the four principles of bioethics, namely respect for autonomy (the obligation to respect the decision-making capacities of autonomous persons); non-maleficence (the obligation to avoid causing harm); beneficence (the obligation to provide benefits and to balance benefits against risks); and justice (the obligation of fairness). It also discusses the challenge of balancing competing duties and ethical demands. Altho
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Laitinen Arto. "What Principles for Moral Machines?" In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-931-7-319.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper examines four kinds of principles for machine morality. (1) exceptionless principles covering all cases and features (e.g. Kantianism, consequentialism); 2) a plurality of midlevel prima facie-principles concerning one act-in-a-situation type (Ross, Beauchamp &amp;amp; Childress, applied to robotics by Anderson &amp;amp; Anderson), as well as their typical enabling and disabling conditions; 3) priority principles concerning the midlevel principles (e.g. F.M. Kamm, Asimov's Laws); 4), overall judgements in situations when everything relevant is taken into account, stressed by particul
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lund, V., and E. M. Forsberg. "Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles applied to animal ethics issues." In Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons. Brill | Wageningen Academic, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/9789086866731_059.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Pugh, Jonathan. "Introduction." In Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858584.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The introduction outlines the motivation for investigating the relationship between autonomy and rationality in contemporary bioethics, and maps the contours of a pre-theoretical understanding of autonomy, in preparation for the theoretical analysis to come. Having noted some apparent ambiguities and tensions within the widely accepted assumption that there is a close relationship between autonomy and rationality, the author briefly distinguishes procedural and substantive accounts of autonomy, and identifies Beauchamp and Childress’ pioneering work in the principles of biomedical ethics as pr
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Rhodes, Rosamond. "Why a New Approach to Medical Ethics Is Needed." In The Trusted Doctor. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190859909.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism rejects the well-entrenched views of medical ethics as everyday ethics or common morality applied to medicine. This chapter lays the foundation for the original account of medical ethics that follows in the book’s succeeding chapters. By presenting vivid examples and general arguments the author demonstrates ways in which the ethics of medicine is distinct and different from common morality. The chapter discusses the most popular common morality views, namely, the four principles approach expounded by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in P
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Shanker, Ruby Rajendra, Angela Underhill, Valerie Nicholson, Logan Kennedy, Denise Jaworsky, and Mona Loutfy. "Ethical Issues in the Care and Support of Women Living with HIV." In Ethical Issues in Women's Healthcare, edited by Lori d’Agincourt-Canning and Carolyn Ells. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190851361.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter aims to explore some of the ethical issues that arise when providing clinical care and support to women living with HIV across the life course. Feminist perspectives and intersectionality inform the authors’ interpretation of the four principles of biomedical ethics as described by Beauchamp and Childress: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The analysis also addresses the issues of stigma and oppression. Developed in accordance with the principles of the Greater Involvement of People Living with HIV/AIDS (GIPA) and Meaningful Involvement of People Living with HIV
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Principles of Beauchamp and Childress' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography