Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Produced water / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Produced water.

Journal articles on the topic 'Produced water'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Produced water.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Szép, Angéla, and Robert Kohlheb. "Water treatment technology for produced water." Water Science and Technology 62, no. 10 (November 1, 2010): 2372–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.524.

Full text

Abstract:

Large amounts of produced water are generated during oil and gas production. Produced water, as it is known in the oil industry, is briny fluid trapped in the rock of oil reservoirs. The objective of this study was to test produced waters from a Montana USA oilfield using a mobile station to design a plant to cost efficiently treat the produced water for agricultural irrigation. We used combined physical and chemical treatment of produced water in order to comply with reuse and discharge limits. This mobile station consists of three stages: pretreatments, membrane filtration and post treatment. Two spiral-wound membrane units were employed and the rejections of various constituents were examined. The performance of two membranes, 20 kDa weight cut-off (MWCO) ultrafiltration and a polyamide-composite reverse osmosis membrane was investigated. The mobile station effectively decreased conductivity by 98%, COD by 100% and the SAR by 2.15 mgeqv0.5 in the produced water tested in this study. Cost analysis showed that the treatment cost of produced water is less expensive than to dispose of it by injection and this treated water may be of great value in water-poor regions. We can conclude that the mobile station provided a viable and cost-effective result to beneficial use of produced water.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Igunnu, Ebenezer T., and George Z. Chen. "Produced water treatment technologies." International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 9, no. 3 (July 4, 2012): 157–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/cts049.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Andrade, V. T., B. G. Andrade, B. R. S. Costa, O. A. Pereira, and M. Dezotti. "Toxicity assessment of oil field produced water treated by evaporative processes to produce water to irrigation." Water Science and Technology 62, no. 3 (August 1, 2010): 693–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.340.

Full text

Abstract:

During the productive life of an oil well, a high quantity of produced water is extracted together with the oil, and it may achieve up to 99% in the end of the well's economical life. Desalination is one of mankind's earliest forms of saline water treatment, and nowadays, it is still a common process used throughout the world. A single-effect mechanical vapor compression (MVC) process was tested. This paper aims to assess the potential toxicity of produced water to be re-used in irrigation. Samples of both produced and distilled water were evaluated by 84 chemical parameters. The distilled produced water presented a reduction up to 97% for the majority of the analyzed parameters, including PAHs. Toxicity bioassays were performed with distilled produced water to evaluate the growth inhibition of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata algae, the acute toxicity to Danio rerio fish, the germination inhibition of Lactuca sativa vegetable and the severity of toxicity, as well as behavior test with Lumbricid Earthworm Eisenia fetida. The ecotoxicological assays results showed no toxicity, indicating that the referred evaporative process can produce water to be reused in irrigation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Wei, Xinchao, Shicheng Zhang, Yongsheng Sun, and Sara A. Brenner. "Petrochemical Wastewater and Produced Water." Water Environment Research 90, no. 10 (October 1, 2018): 1634–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143018x15289915807344.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Bilstad, T., and E. Espedal. "Membrane separation of produced water." Water Science and Technology 34, no. 9 (November 1, 1996): 239–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.1996.0221.

Full text

Abstract:

Each time regulatory agencies initiate more stringent environmental controls, treatment technologies are refined to meet the updated standards. Centrifuges and hydrocyclones are, by and large, producing satisfactory effluents for meeting current quality requirements for the offshore petroleum industries. The European standard for effluent from onshore petroleum activities, however, requires less than 5 mg/l total hydrocarbons (HC) and less than 10 mg/l suspended solids. Such low concentrations are out of reach for the above classical separation processes. The amount of produced water in the North Sea is projected to increase by a factor of 6 from 1990 to the year 2000; from 16 to 90 million cubic meters each year. Produced water is the predominant source for oil discharges. The synergistic effects of chemicals, oil and dissolved components in the produced water effluent are given increased attention, with expectations of tougher effluent criteria. Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) pilot trials with produced water from the Snorre field in the North Sea showed that UF, but not MF, could meet more stringent effluent standards for total HC, suspended solids and dissolved constituents. Total HC in the produced water was typically 50 mg/l and was reduced to 2 mg/l in the UF permeate (96% removal). The aromatics benzene, toluene and xylene (BTX) were similarly reduced by 54% and the heavy metals copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) by 95%. UF trials were performed with organic tubular membranes with typical transmembrane pressures between 6 and 10 bars. The feed velocities through the tubes were between 2 and 4 m/s. Flux varied from 140 to 550 l/m2/h (lmh) at a produced water temperature of 60°C and membrane molecular weight cut-off between 100,000 and 200,000 daltons. By recirculating UF retentate as membrane feed, a volume reduction (VR) of 24 was obtained in the trials; i.e., 96% permeate recovery. The limited volume of produced water available in the feed tank negated further volume reduction. Full-scale design is based on permeate recovery of 99%. No irreversible fouling of the membrane surface was experienced. The cleanwater flux was restored after chemical cleaning. The alkaline detergent Ultrasil 11 was chosen as the optimal cleaning agent.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Dahlheim, Robin, and William J. Pike. "Generating Electricity From Produced Water." Journal of Petroleum Technology 64, no. 12 (December 1, 2012): 30–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1212-0030-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ho, Kay, and Dan Caudle. "ION TOXICITY AND PRODUCED WATER." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16, no. 10 (1997): 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/1551-5028(1997)016<1993:itapw>2.3.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

de Rijke, Kim. "Produced water, money water, living water: Anthropological perspectives on water and fracking." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 5, no. 2 (December 28, 2017): e1272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1272.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Ku Ishak, Ku Esyra Hani, and Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub. "Performance of liquid–liquid hydrocyclone (LLHC) for treating produced water from surfactant flooding produced water." World Journal of Engineering 17, no. 2 (December 2, 2019): 215–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/wje-01-2019-0003.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of the fabricated liquid–liquid hydrocyclone (LLHC) with dimensions similar to those of one of the Malaysian oilfields with the presence of an anionic surfactant, S672. The effect of salinity and initial oil concentration were also investigated following the actual range concentration. Design/methodology/approach The current control system’s pressure drop ratio (PDR) does not necessarily lead to an efficient LLHC. Therefore, rather than using the PDR, the efficiency of the LLHC was analyzed by comparing the concentration of oil in the effluents with the concentration of oil at the feed of the LLHC. An LLHC test rig was developed at Centre of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS. Emulsions were prepared by mixing the brines, S672 and oil by using Ultra Turrax ultrasonic mixer. The emulsion was pumped into the LLHC at different feed flowrate and split ratio. The brines concentration, initial oil concentration and S672 concentration were also varied in this study. Samples were taken at the underflow of the LLHC and the oil in water concentration analysis was done for the samples using TD-500D equipment. Findings It was found that the efficiency of oil removal decreased with an increase in S672 concentration but increased with the increase in salinity and initial oil concentration. Originality/value The optimum feed flowrate for the LLHC of 45 mm diameter and length of 1,125 mm with the presence of S672 surfactant was found to be 40 L/min with a split ratio of 14%. This study can be used as a guidance for future optimization of the LLHC in the presence of the surfactant.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Kan, Tao, Vladimir Strezov, Tim Evans, and Peter Nelson. "Analysis of Water Produced during Thermal Decomposition of Goethitic Iron Ore." International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications 7, no. 5 (October 2016): 327–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijcea.2016.7.5.599.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Hoek, Eric M. V., Jingbo Wang, Tony D. Hancock, Arian Edalat, Subir Bhattacharjee, and David Jassby. "Oil & Gas Produced Water Management." Synthesis Lectures on Sustainable Development 2, no. 1 (May 7, 2021): 1–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/s01003ed1v01y202003sde002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Ibrahim, Taleb Hassan, Muhammad Ashraf Sabri, Mustafa Ibrahim Khamis, Yehya Amin Elsayed, Ziad Sara, and Barra Hafez. "Produced water treatment using olive leaves." DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT 60 (2017): 129–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.0720.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Wang, Jingbo, Dian Tanuwidjaja, Subir Bhattacharjee, Arian Edalat, David Jassby, and Eric M. V. Hoek. "Produced Water Desalination via Pervaporative Distillation." Water 12, no. 12 (December 18, 2020): 3560. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w12123560.

Full text

Abstract:

Herein, we report on the performance of a hybrid organic-ceramic hydrophilic pervaporation membrane applied in a vacuum membrane distillation operating mode to desalinate laboratory prepared saline waters and a hypersaline water modeled after a real oil and gas produced water. The rational for performing “pervaporative distillation” is that highly contaminated waters like produced water, reverse osmosis concentrates and industrial have high potential to foul and scale membranes, and for traditional porous membrane distillation membranes they can suffer pore-wetting and complete salt passage. In most of these processes, the hard to treat feed water is commonly softened and filtered prior to a desalination process. This study evaluates pervaporative distillation performance treating: (1) NaCl solutions from 10 to 240 g/L at crossflow Reynolds numbers from 300 to 4800 and feed-temperatures from 60 to 85 °C and (2) a real produced water composition chemically softened to reduce its high-scale forming mineral content. The pervaporative distillation process proved highly-effective at desalting all feed streams, consistently delivering <10 mg/L of dissolved solids in product water under all operating condition tested with reasonably high permeate fluxes (up to 23 LMH) at optimized operating conditions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Išek, Josip, Dušan Danilović, Miroslav Crnogorac, and Branko Leković. "Overview of produced water in oilfield." Podzemni radovi, no. 33 (2018): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/podrad1833079i.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Boschee, Pam. "Handling Produced Water from Hydraulic Fracturing." Oil and Gas Facilities 1, no. 01 (February 1, 2012): 22–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0212-0022-ogf.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Whalen, Tom. "The Challenges of Reusing Produced Water." Journal of Petroleum Technology 64, no. 11 (November 1, 2012): 18–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1112-0018-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Drioli, Enrico, Aamer Ali, Young Moo Lee, Sharaf F. Al-Sharif, Mohammed Al-Beirutty, and Francesca Macedonio. "Membrane operations for produced water treatment." Desalination and Water Treatment 57, no. 31 (July 28, 2015): 14317–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1072585.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Osicka, Radek. "Produced water at UGS Dolni Dunajovice." International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology 3, no. 4 (2010): 342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijogct.2010.037463.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

An, Hongjie, Beng Hau Tan, James Guo Sheng Moo, Sheng Liu, Martin Pumera, and Claus-Dieter Ohl. "Graphene Nanobubbles Produced by Water Splitting." Nano Letters 17, no. 5 (April 12, 2017): 2833–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05183.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Cho, Y. I., K. C. Wright, H. S. Kim, D. J. Cho, A. Rabinovich, and A. Fridman. "Stretched arc discharge in produced water." Review of Scientific Instruments 86, no. 1 (January 2015): 013501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4905169.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Al-Maamari, Rashid S., Mark Sueyoshi, Masaharu Tasaki, Keisuke Kojima, and Kazuo Okamura. "Polymer-Flood Produced-Water-Treatment Trials." Oil and Gas Facilities 3, no. 06 (December 1, 2014): 089–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/172024-pa.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Stolberg, Alex, and Hanan Frenk. "Development of water-immersion produced analgesia." Developmental Psychobiology 28, no. 4 (May 1995): 247–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.420280406.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Venkatesan, Anand, and Phillip C. Wankat. "Produced water desalination: An exploratory study." Desalination 404 (February 2017): 328–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

张, 同哲. "Application of Oilfield Produced Water Treatment Technology in Produced Water Diluting in Viscosity Reduction Combination Flooding." Hans Journal of Chemical Engineering and Technology 11, no. 05 (2021): 274–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/hjcet.2021.115037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Schröder, H. Fr. "Polar, hydrophilic compounds in drinking water produced from surface water." Journal of Chromatography A 554, no. 1-2 (August 1991): 251–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(01)88454-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Bader, M. S. H. "Seawater versus produced water in oil-fields water injection operations." Desalination 208, no. 1-3 (April 2007): 159–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Dahm, Katharine G., Katie L. Guerra, Junko Munakata-Marr, and Jörg E. Drewes. "Trends in water quality variability for coalbed methane produced water." Journal of Cleaner Production 84 (December 2014): 840–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.033.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Vazquez, Oscar, Ross A. McCartney, and Eric Mackay. "Produced-Water-Chemistry History Matching Using a 1D Reactive Injector/Producer Reservoir Model." SPE Production & Operations 28, no. 04 (September 8, 2013): 369–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164113-pa.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Faouzi, Mouna, Mohamed Merzouki, Hanane El Fadel, and Mohamed Benlemlih. "The SBR process : an efficient and economical solution for depollution of the effluent produced by the gaseous drinks company of North-Fez (Morocco)." European journal of water quality 39, no. 2 (2008): 181–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/water/2008005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Rassenfoss, Stephen. "Shale Water: Turning Dirty Produced Water Into Fresh Water and Salt To Sell." Journal of Petroleum Technology 69, no. 11 (November 1, 2017): 24–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1117-0024-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Whitfield, Stephen. "Permian, Bakken Operators Face Produced Water Challenges." Journal of Petroleum Technology 69, no. 06 (June 1, 2017): 48–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0617-0048-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

JPT staff, _. "Converting Oilfield Produced Water to Reusable Quality." Journal of Petroleum Technology 51, no. 06 (June 1, 1999): 62–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0699-0062-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Onwuachi-Iheagwara, P. N. "ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND TREATMENT OF PRODUCED WATER." Continental J. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 3, no. 1 (June 23, 2012): 21–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5707/cjwasp.2012.3.1.21.24.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

HAN, Chunjie, Yang LIU, Tan ZHAO, and Guolin JING. "Reclamation of the Polymer-Flooding Produced Water." Journal of Water Resource and Protection 01, no. 01 (2009): 29–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2009.11005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Fang, C. S., and J. H. Lin. "Air Stripping for Treatment of Produced Water." Journal of Petroleum Technology 40, no. 05 (May 1, 1988): 619–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16328-pa.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

JPT staff, _. "Green Plants Reduce Produced-Water Disposal Volume." Journal of Petroleum Technology 50, no. 10 (October 1, 1998): 62–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1098-0062-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Ochi, Jalel, Dominique Dexheimer, and P. Vincent Corpel. "Produced-Water-Reinjection Design and Uncertainties Assessment." SPE Production & Operations 29, no. 03 (August 1, 2014): 192–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165138-pa.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Meldrum, N. "Hydrocyclones: A Solution to Produced-Water Treatment." SPE Production Engineering 3, no. 04 (November 1, 1988): 669–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16642-pa.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Kleimenova, K. E., and A. A. Virko. "METHOD OF GALLIUM RECOVERY FROM PRODUCED WATER." Petroleum Engineering 20, no. 4 (September 2022): 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2022-4-115-122.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Bretz, R. E., F. D. Martin, and Chris Russell. "Produced Water: Technological/Environmental Issues and Solutions." Journal of Environmental Quality 23, no. 2 (March 1994): 391. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300020034x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Wright, Blake. "The Produced Water Conundrum Grows Across Unconventionals." Journal of Petroleum Technology 74, no. 01 (January 1, 2022): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0122-0038-jpt.

Full text

Abstract:

Shale players have a love-hate relationship with water. It’s an essential ally going into downhole to help proliferate fractures in the subsurface and free up stuck hydrocarbons. It’s a parasite coming out - a briny byproduct that can easily outpace oil production from any given well. Likewise, operators must deal with water management on dual fronts. The first is sourcing the water to be used in the fracturing of the well. Second is finding the right solution for the flowback and formation water coming out of the well. Early on, the answer for the former was freshwater sources. However, once the strain set in from general scarcity, drought, environmental concerns or the like, industry started looking hard at the recycle and reuse of produced water - a solution where the problem becomes the answer. Water recycling rates vary widely between unconventional basins. For the domestic oil industry, data provider IHS Markit forecast in an April 2020 report the vast majority of wastewater leaving an oil field in 2022 will still not be recycled. It will instead be injected into disposal wells, which is currently the most common practice for produced water management. This option is costly and risky, especially for wells that are located some distance from the nearest disposal well. It has also come under increased scrutiny because of the potential effects of disposal well use on the surrounding area’s seismic activity. “Going back to the beginning of unconventional resource production, the focus was understandably on the water needed for drilling and completions,” Paola Perez-Pena, a principal researcher at IHS Markit, commented in an analysis. “Now that there is a considerable, established production, operators are realizing the extent to which produced water is not only a sizable matter, but an ongoing and essentially, perpetual one.” Produced water is a mix of the water pumped down the well to assist with fracturing plus residual drilling fluid and formation water. On average, with every barrel of oil produced in the US, more than 4 bbl of wastewater is produced, though that number varies from basin to basin. “With water, what you find is producers consider a number of different piping configurations, storage, and disposal well options, as well as reuse opportunities,” said John Walsh, principal technologist for Worley Advisian and author of the book, Produced Water. “There’s no one single strategy or approach that’s going to solve the water problem. There is no silver bullet.” According to an industry brief by Raymond James in July 2019, pre-pandemic US oilfield water production was already a whopping 50 million BWPD. For scale, this amount of water could cover more than 8,000 football fields with a foot of water, every day. The investment bank estimated just under half of the total produced water came from horizontal basins, despite making up close to 80% of onshore crude production. The report forecast that the total volume of produced water from major oil basins in the US could grow to more than 60 million BWPD by 2030 (Fig. 1).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Kulikova, O. A., E. A. Mazlova, and D. I. Bradik. "Principled Approaches to Integrated Produced Water Treatment." Ecology and Industry of Russia 21, no. 10 (January 1, 2017): 28–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2017-10-28-33.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Chen, Cheng, Xiaofei Huang, Prakhar Prakash, Satish Chilekar, and Rich Franks. "Produced water desalination using high temperature membranes." Desalination 513 (October 2021): 115144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115144.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Plassard, L., A. Mouret, C. Nieto-Draghi, C. Dalmazzone, D. Langevin, and J. F. Argillier. "Impact of Electrolytes on Produced Water Destabilization." Energy & Fuels 36, no. 3 (January 12, 2022): 1271–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02490.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Amakiri, Kingsley Tamunokuro, Anyela Ramirez Canon, Marco Molinari, and Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis. "Review of oilfield produced water treatment technologies." Chemosphere 298 (July 2022): 134064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134064.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Yang, Ming. "Effective Treatment and Handling of Produced Water." Journal of Petroleum Technology 72, no. 02 (February 1, 2020): 24–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0220-0024-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Bybee, Karen. "Produced-Water-Volume Estimates and Management Practices." Journal of Petroleum Technology 63, no. 03 (March 1, 2011): 77–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0311-0077-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Denney, Dennis. "Subsea Separation and Reinjection of Produced Water." Journal of Petroleum Technology 52, no. 04 (April 1, 2000): 48–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0400-0048-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Denney, Dennis. "Removing Dissolved Hydrocarbons From Offshore Produced Water." Journal of Petroleum Technology 54, no. 04 (April 1, 2002): 54–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0402-0054-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Carpenter, Chris. "Produced-Water-Reinjection Design and Uncertainties Assessment." Journal of Petroleum Technology 65, no. 12 (December 1, 2013): 129–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1213-0129-jpt.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!