Academic literature on the topic 'Progressive randomization'

Abstract Abstract 3416 Poster Board III-304 Relapse and/or progression of disease are the primary causes of treatment failure after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective of CALGB 100104 was to investigate whether adding maintenance therapy would improve the time to progression (TTP). The study was powered to detect an improvement of 9.6 months (prolongation of TTP from 24 months to 33.6 months) in MM patients undergoing a single ASCT. Secondary objectives were the Complete Response conversion rate following maintenance initiation, the Overall Survival and the feasibility of long term lenalidomide maintenance therapy. Eligible MM patients were Durie-Salmon Stage I-III patients within 1 year of diagnosis, receiving at least 2 months of any induction therapy with response (Stable Disease (SD) or better) and ≤ 70 years of age. Patients with progressive disease prior to ASCT were not eligible for study. Patients underwent stem cell mobilization followed by Melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT with a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34 cells/kg for stem cell infusion. Responding patients with SD or better were randomized at day 100 to 110 post ASCT to study drug versus placebo. Patients with progressive disease were not randomized. Randomized patients were stratified by elevated β2 microglobulin at diagnosis and prior thalidomide or lenalidomide use during induction therapy. The starting dose was 10 mg daily with an escalation at 3 months to 15 mg if tolerated. Study drug could be de-escalated by 5 mg daily if not tolerated. Patients could be maintained at 5, 10 or 15 mg as tolerated and were followed with monthly complete blood counts. Drug was held for neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500/μl or thrombocytopenia (<30,000/ μl) and restarted after resolution of cytopenia(s). Patients were re-staged by blood and urine testing every 3 months, by skeletal survey and bone marrow testing yearly and remained on maintenance therapy until progression. A total of 568 pts were registered at centers from the following cooperative groups: CALGB (n=377), ECOG (n=132), and BMT-CTN (n=59). The study opened in 12/2004 with increasing annual accrual: 2005, n=33, (6%); 2006, n=62, (11%); 2007, n=137, (24%); 2008, n=214, (38%); 2009, n=122, (21%) and study closure on 07/03/09. The drop out rate before randomization at day 100 to 110 was projected to be 10-15% with an expected randomization of 462 patients. Among the 568 registered patients, 424 have been randomized, 81 have dropped out pre-randomization and 63 are pending randomization as of 08/06/09. Projected final randomization is approximately 475. Pooled Hematologic and Non-Hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) are available from 275 patients in both arms. Individual patients experiencing Hematologic AEs are as follows: Grade 3 (severe) n=43 (16%); Grade 4 (life-threatening) n=26 (9%); and no Grade 5 (lethal). Individual patients experiencing Non-Hematologic AEs are as follows: Grade 3 n=74 (27%); Grade 4 n=9 (3%); Grade 5 n=5 (2%). The most common Non-Hematologic AEs were infection, fever, rash and fatigue. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will continue to monitor the study for AEs and determination of progression. This large Phase III study has successfully completed patient registration and is nearing completion of patient randomization at day 100 to 110 post ASCT through the cooperation of the Intergroup oncology and transplant clinical research groups. Further analysis will determine if maintenance therapy with lenalidomide (CC-5013) is of benefit for MM patients following single ASCT. Disclosures McCarthy: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for maintenance therapy following autotransplant for multiple myeloma. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millenium (Research Funding and Advisory Board), Celgene, Keryx, BMS, Merck, Johnson and Johnson (All Advisory Board): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Anderson:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

3503 Background: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after stop of first-line chemotherapy. Methods: In an open-label, phase 3 multicenter study conducted in Switzerland, patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer having non-progressive disease after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to continuing bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks between randomization and disease progression. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significant level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%. Results: The per-protocol population comprised 262 patients. Median follow-up is 28.6 months (range, 0.6-54.9 months). Median TTP was 17.9 weeks (95% CI 13.3-23.4) for bevacizumab continuation and 12.6 weeks (95% CI 12.0-16.4) for no continuation; HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.92). Median progression free-survival and overall survival, both measured from start of first-line treatment, was 9.5 months and 24.9 months for bevacizumab continuation and 8.5 months (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 - 0.94)) and 22.8 months (HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.64 – 1.18)) for no continuation. Median time from randomization to second-line treatment was 5.9 months for bevacizumab and 4.8 for no continuation. Grade 3-4 adverse events in the bevacizumab continuation arm were uncommon. Conclusions: Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The 95% confidence intervals for the TTP HR indicate superiority of bevacizumab continuation after stop of first-line chemotherapy. The median differences in TTP and in time between randomization and start of second-line treatment were of moderate magnitude being less than 6 weeks. The results of an accompanying cost analysis will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00544700.

10005 Background: IM the first-line targeted therapy for advanced GIST, must not be interrupted after one year (yr) in responding patients (pts) and has to be given continuously until disease progression (PD) or intolerance (Blay, Le Cesne et al, ASCO 2004 and 2005). The impact on progression free survival (PFS) of IM discontinuation in long lasting responding pts is unknown. Methods: This prospective national multicenter BFR14 study was initiated in June 2002. After 3 yrs of IM 400mg/day, pts free from progression were randomly offered to continue (C arm) or interrupt (I arm) IM, with the exception of pts initially randomized in the I arm after 1 yr of IM (32 pts). Pts allocated to the I arm could restart IM (same dose) in case of PD. Primary endpoint was PFS. Pts declining randomization proceed with IM. Results: As of december 2006, 286 pts were included in this trial and up to date, 35 non progressive pts at 3 yrs were randomized, 19 and 16 in the I anc C arm respectively. Pt characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Nine progressions were reported after a median follow-up of 5.3 months (range 0–14) in this cohort of patients. IM reintroduction in the I arm after a re-progression allowed again a tumor control (OR or SD) in all evaluable pts so far. Conclusions: An increase in the rate of PD was observed in patients randomized after 3 years of IM. The final analysis will be performed after the randomization of 50 pts. Updated results including mutational analysis will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.