Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Promoting plant growth

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Promoting plant growth'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 10 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Promoting plant growth.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Promoting plant growth"

1

Preston, Gail M. "Plant perceptions of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 359, no. 1446 (June 29, 2004): 907–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1384.

Full text

Abstract:

Plant–associated Pseudomonas live as saprophytes and parasites on plant surfaces and inside plant tissues. Many plant–associated Pseudomonas promote plant growth by suppressing pathogenic micro–organisms, synthesizing growth–stimulating plant hormones and promoting increased plant disease resistance. Others inhibit plant growth and cause disease symptoms ranging from rot and necrosis through to developmental dystrophies such as galls. It is not easy to draw a clear distinction between pathogenic and plant growth–promoting Pseudomonas . They colonize the same ecological niches and possess similar mechanisms for plant colonization. Pathogenic, saprophytic and plant growth–promoting strains are often found within the same species, and the incidence and severity of Pseudomonas diseases are affected by environmental factors and host–specific interactions. Plants are faced with the challenge of how to recognize and exclude pathogens that pose a genuine threat, while tolerating more benign organisms. This review examines Pseudomonas from a plant perspective, focusing in particular on the question of how plants perceive and are affected by saprophytic and plant growth–promoting Pseudomonas (PGPP), in contrast to their interactions with plant pathogenic Pseudomonas . A better understanding of the molecular basis of plant–PGPP interactions and of the key differences between pathogens and PGPP will enable researchers to make more informed decisions in designing integrated disease–control strategies and in selecting, modifying and using PGPP for plant growth promotion, bioremediation and biocontrol.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Glick, Bernard R. "The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria." Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41, no. 2 (February 1, 1995): 109–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/m95-015.

Full text

Abstract:

The ways in which plant growth promoting rhizobacteria facilitate the growth of plants are considered and discussed. Both indirect and direct mechanisms of plant growth promotion are dealt with. The possibility of improving plant growth promoting rhizobacteria by specific genetic manipulation is critically examined.Key words: plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, PGPR, bacterial fertilizer, soil bacteria.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Hills, P. N., L. M. Kotze, L. E. Steenkamp, N. N. Ludidi, and J. M. Kossmann. "Plant growth promoting substances." South African Journal of Botany 75, no. 2 (April 2009): 405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2009.02.061.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Mandava, N. B. "Plant Growth-Promoting Brassinosteroids." Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39, no. 1 (June 1988): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.39.060188.000323.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Miransari, Mohammad. "Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria." Journal of Plant Nutrition 37, no. 14 (August 30, 2014): 2227–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.920384.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Lugtenberg, Ben, and Faina Kamilova. "Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria." Annual Review of Microbiology 63, no. 1 (October 2009): 541–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Singh, Jay Shankar. "Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria." Resonance 18, no. 3 (March 2013): 275–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12045-013-0038-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Jeyanthi, V., and S. Kanimozhi. "Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) - Prospective and Mechanisms: A Review." Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 12, no. 2 (June 30, 2018): 733–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.22207/jpam.12.2.34.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Ross, John J., and James B. Reid. "Evolution of growth-promoting plant hormones." Functional Plant Biology 37, no. 9 (2010): 795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/fp10063.

Full text

Abstract:

The plant growth hormones auxin, gibberellins (GAs) and brassinosteroids (BRs) are major determinants of plant growth and development. Recently, key signalling components for these hormones have been identified in vascular plants and, at least for the GAs and BRs, biosynthetic pathways have been clarified. The genome sequencing of a range of species, including a few non-flowering plants, has allowed insight into the evolution of the hormone systems. It appears that the moss Physcomitrella patens can respond to auxin and contains key elements of the auxin signalling pathway, although there is some doubt as to whether it shows a fully developed rapid auxin response. On the other hand, P. patens does not show a GA response, even though it contains genes for components of GA signalling. The GA response system appears to be more advanced in the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii than in P. patens. Signalling systems for BRs probably arose after the evolutionary divergence of the mosses and vascular plants, although detailed information is limited. Certainly, the processes affected by the growth hormones (e.g. GAs) can differ in the different plant groups, and there is evidence that with the evolution of the angiosperms, the hormone systems have become more complex at the gene level. The intermediate nature of mosses in terms of overall hormone biology allows us to speculate about the possible relationship between the evolution of plant growth hormones and the evolution of terrestrial vascular plants in general.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Santoyo, Gustavo, Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb, Ma del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, and Bernard R. Glick. "Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes." Microbiological Research 183 (February 2016): 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Promoting plant growth"

1

Hu, Chia-Hui Kloepper Joseph. "Induction of growth promotion and stress tolerance in arabidopsis and tomato by plant growth-promoting." Auburn, Ala., 2005. http://repo.lib.auburn.edu/2005%20Summer/doctoral/HU_CHIA-HUI_54.pdf.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Davies, Keith Graham. "Studies on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria." Thesis, Bangor University, 1986. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.266612.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Thomas, N. F. "Synthesis of the plant growth promoting steroid brassinolide." Thesis, Cardiff University, 1985. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.333124.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Lewis, Ricky W. "TOXICITY OF ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS TO PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA." UKnowledge, 2016. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_etds/77.

Full text

Abstract:

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have become ubiquitous in consumer products and industrial applications, and consequently the environment. Much of the environmentally released ENMs are expected to enter terrestrial ecosystems via land application of nano-enriched biosolids to agricultural fields. Among the organisms most likely to encounter nano-enriched biosolids are the key soil bacteria known as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). I reviewed what is known concerning the toxicological effects of ENMs to PGPR and observed the need for high-throughput methods to evaluate lethal and sublethal toxic responses of aerobic microbes. I addressed this issue by developing high-throughput microplate assays which allowed me to normalize oxygen consumption responses to viable cell estimates. Oxygen consumption is a crucial step in cellular respiration which may be examined relatively easily along with viability and may provide insight into the metabolic/physiological response of bacteria to toxic substances. Because many of the most toxic nanomaterials (i.e. metal containing materials) exhibit some level of ionic dissolution, I first developed my methods by examining metal ion responses in the PGPR, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GB03. I found this bacterium exhibits differential oxygen consumption responses to Ag+, Zn2+, and Ni2+. Exposure to Ag+ elicited pronounced increases in O2 consumption, particularly when few viable cells were observed. Also, while Ni2+ and Zn2+ are generally thought to induce similar toxic responses, I found O2 consumption per viable cell was much more variable during Ni2+ exposure and that Zn2+ induced increased O2 utilization to a lesser extent than Ag+. Additionally, I showed my method is useful for probing toxicity of traditional antibiotics by observing large increases in O2 utilization in response to streptomycin, which was used as a positive control due to its known effects on bacterial respiration. After showing the utility of my method for examining metal ion responses in a single species of PGPR, I investigated the toxicity of silver ENMs (AgENMs) and ions to three PGPR, B. amyloliquefaciens GB03, Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011, and Pseudomonas putida UW4. The ENM exposures consisted of untransformed, polyvinylpyrrolidone coated silver ENMs (PVP-AgENMs) and 100% sulfidized silver ENMs (sAgENMs), which are representative of environmentally transformed AgENMs. I observed species specific O2 consumption responses to silver ions and PVP-AgENMs. Specifically, P. putida exhibited increased O2 consumption across the observed range of viable cells, while B. amyloliquefaciens exhibited responses similar to those found in my first study. Additionally, S. meliloti exhibited more complex responses to Ag+ and PVP-AgENMs, with decreased O2 consumption when cell viability was ~50-75% of no metal controls and increased O2 consumption when cell viability was <50%. I also found the abiotically dissolved fraction of the PVP-AgENMs was likely responsible for most of the toxic response, while abiotic dissolution did not explain the toxicity of sAgENMs. My work has yielded a straightforward, cost-effective, and high-throughput method of evaluating viability and oxygen consumption in aerobic bacteria. I have used this method to test a broad range of toxic substances, including, metal ions, antibiotics, and untransformed and transformed ENMs. I observed species specific toxic responses to Ag+, PVP-AgENMs, and sAgENMs in PGPR. These results not only show the clear utility of the methodology, but also that it will be crucial to continue examining the responses of specific bacterial strains even as nanotoxicology, as a field, must move toward more complex and environmentally relevant systems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Abdul, Mutalib Asilah. "Interactions between plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPM) and biochar." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2018. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49082/.

Full text

Abstract:

Rhizobia are frequently used in the agriculture sector to enhance legume growth and improve soil fertility. There is growing interest in utilizing biological nitrogen fixation as a means of increasing the potential for sustainable intensification of food production whilst simultaneously reducing environmental damage caused by overuse of chemical fertilisers. Biochar, a recalcitrant carbon-rich product of pyrolysis which may be added to soil as a fertilizer or as a soil improver, alters soil physico-chemical properties usually by acting as a liming agent, by increasing water holding capacity or by modifying cation exchange capacity. The effects of biochar on the soil microbial community are not fully understood. Therefore, the main aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of biochar on the Rhizobium-legume relationship and determine whether biochar could increase legume growth. To achieve this aim, a series of growth experiments were carried out under controlled conditions in which broad bean (Vicia faba) was grown with Rhizobium leguminosarum and the symbiosis tested against three concentrations of biochar applied as a soil amendment and with two different char particle sizes. Beans responded well to Rhizobium under char-free conditions but the effects of biochar on the symbiosis were variable and depended on char particle size, concentration and Rhizobium strain (commercial or indigenous). Powdered char inhibited plant growth when in the presence of the commercial rhizobia, but not with indigenous strains. This is an important finding since commercial inocula are commonly used in agronomic situations. Plant available soil nutrients were modified by biochar and surprisingly by an interaction between char concentration and the two rhizobia strains. When beans were co-cropped with wheat, beans performed better when grown with powdered char than without. This is in contrast to the response of bean plants to powdered char in the absence of any competition. Since wheat was generally the superior competitor, powdered char amendment enabled the bean to take advantage of the N-limiting environment that powdered char created and perform better than in the soils that advantaged the wheat. The investigation highlighted the complexity of the system, but identified the importance of char particle size and Rhizobium strain selection.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Mulaudzi, Renolda Ipeleng. "Assessment of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for plant growth enhancement and biocontrol activity against Fusarium pseudograminearum on wheat." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/77860.

Full text

Abstract:

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are those bacteria that colonise the rhizosphere of various plants and promote growth either directly by improving nutrient uptake by the plant roots or indirectly through the control of pathogens. Due to the negative effects associated with the prolonged use of chemical fertilizers and fungicides, a lot of emphasis is now being given to research that investigates an alternative, sustainable and environmentally friendly method of crop production and protection. In the current study, a collection of rhizobacterial isolates from the University of Pretoria- Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (UP-PGPR) culture collection were screened for plant growth promotion and biocontrol activity against crown rot caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum on wheat (Triticum aestivum). A seedling tray bioassay was utilised as a rapid small-scale method to screen the rhizobacterial isolates for biocontrol activity against wheat crown rot in the greenhouse. The same method was also used to screen the isolates for direct plant growth promotion of wheat. Of all the isolates (113) screened for wheat crown rot control, 52% (59 isolates) significantly increased the shoot dry weight of the seedlings, 41% (46 isolates) increased the root dry weight of the seedlings, and the total seedling dry weight was increased by 32% (36 isolates) of the isolates. A seedling bioassay was also used to screen the isolates for direct plant growth promotion of wheat. Of the 113 isolates screened, 12% (14 isolates) increased the shoot dry weight of the seedlings, 22% (25 isolates) increased the dry weight of the roots; while the total dry weight of the seedlings was increased by 32% (36 isolates) of the isolates. Subsequent to the seedling bioassay in the greenhouse, the isolates were also assessed in vitro for selected traits associated with biocontrol activity and plant growth promotion. To test for a broad spectrum of biocontrol activity, in addition to F. pseudograminearum, the isolates were also screened for inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora capsici and Macrophomina phaseolina. Almost 50% of the isolates displayed broad-spectrum activity against the pathogens on three different media. Some notable isolates in this regard were Bacillus sp. strain N54 and Pseudomonas sp. strain N59, N67 and N69. All isolates screened displayed multiple traits associated with biocontrol activity such as the production of antibiotic enzymes, volatiles (NH3 and HCN) and the production of siderophores. The isolates also displayed multiple traits associated with direct plant growth promotion (nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, IAA and ACC deaminase). Based on the results obtained from the seedling bioassays in the greenhouse and the in vitro screening, a scoring system was developed, and the isolates were awarded points. Bacillus sp. strain A09AC, A17, A20, N02, N28, N54 Stenotrophomonas sp. strain A45, Pseudomonas sp. strain N04AC, N44 and N59A were selected for pot trials to confirm their F. pseudograminearum biocontrol efficacy (Figure 1.1). Bacillus sp. strain A10AC, Stenotrophomonas sp. strain A33, A43, A45, Paenibacillus sp. strain KBS1F3, Pseudomonas sp. strain N29, N69, N67, N76 and Pantoea sp. strain N34 were selected for use in pot trials in the greenhouse to confirm their efficacy as wheat growth promoters. The selected isolates were further assessed for biocontrol activity and plant growth promotion in greenhouse experiments. KBS1F3 (Paenibacillus alvei) showed the best results for wheat growth promotion while A17 (Bacillus cereus) gave the best results for biocontrol activity. The effect of temperature, pH, NaCl and different carbon sources on the growth of the isolates was also assessed in vitro. The optimum temperature of all isolates was observed to be between 26oC and 35oC while KBS1F3 was able to grow at 47oC and A17 at 50oC. The growth of KBS1F3 decreased with an increase in NaCl concentration while A17 still grew well at 4% NaCl concentration. All isolates grew optimally at pH 7. KBS1F3 still grew well at pH 8 while A17 showed good growth at all pH values except pH 4. All isolates showed the ability to utilise a variety of carbon sources.
Dissertation (MSc (Agric))--University of Pretoria, 2019.
Microbiology and Plant Pathology
MSc (Agric)
Unrestricted

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Grandlic, Christopher J. "Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Suitable for the Phytostabilization of Mine Tailings." Diss., The University of Arizona, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195918.

Full text

Abstract:

Mining activities and their resulting wastes, mine tailings, have created a sizable problem globally. Semiarid lands have been particularly impacted due to intense mining activities in these areas. Growing concerns regarding human health risks and environmental consequences associated with these tailings has created a need for efficient and effective remediation strategies. Phytostabilization, the establishment of a vegetative cover on mine tailings to reduce erosion and dispersion of material, is emerging as a cost-effective remediation technology. However, due to elevated levels of metal contaminants, acidic pH values and poor substrate quality many tailings sites are inhospitable to plant growth. The addition of compost amendments can mitigate the toxic effects of tailings material and facilitate plant growth; however, in many instances the necessary compost amendments may be cost prohibitive. The use of specialized bacterial isolates, known as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), to enhance plant growth is a developing technology that has a broad range of applications. The use of PGPB to enhance one or more aspect of plant establishment and growth has been demonstrated to be effective in hundreds of previous studies conducted primarily under agricultural settings. To date, very few studies have utilized PGPB in attempts to enhance plant growth in mine tailings. The current study is an investigation into the potential for utilizing PGPB to enhance plant growth during the phytostabilization of semiarid mine tailings. During this investigation a large collection of bacterial isolates was screened for common plant growth-promoting mechanisms such as siderophore and indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilization and ACC-deaminase activity. Isolates possessing beneficial qualities were utilized in a series of greenhouse screening studies to evaluate their abilities to enhance the growth of native desert plants in various tailings materials. A number of isolates tested have demonstrated the ability to enhance plant growth in composted and non-composted tailings material. Optimization of this technology has now indicated that alginate-encapsulated inoculation of target plants is a beneficial and practical technology.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Wu, Ruomou. "Identification of candidate plant growth promoting endophytes from Echium plantagineum roots." University of the Western Cape, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/6288.

Full text

Abstract:

Magister Scientiae - MSc (Biotechnology)
The yearly increase of global population will result in a greater demand for crop production, but with the climates changes and a lack of available agricultural land it will become increasingly more difficult to provide sufficient crops to feed everyone adequately. Application of the PGPE has proven over the past researches to be able enhance growth of plants via various growth promoting mechanisms. To identify suitable growth promoting bacteria candidate, E. plantagineum plant was used to isolate endophytes from the root after surface sterilization. The isolates bacteria were used to inoculate Brassica napus L seeds. The effects of isolate's ability to promote growth were evaluated based on the certain growth parameters after 42 days in the green house. Isolate CP5 produced highest results in all growth parameter. Isolates CP5 was selected as potential candidate as significant improvement was shown by this isolate. This isolate was tested for the ability to produce ACC deaminase, solubilize phosphate, synthesize IAA and siderophore production. Furthermore isolate CP5 growth promotion abilities was tested on Brassica napus L under antimony stress.
2021-08-31

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Adele, Nyekachi Chituru. "Effects of metal speciation on metal plant dynamics in the presence of plant growth promoting bacteria." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25414.

Full text

Abstract:

Excessive metal deposition in soil is of major concern to the environment due to the toxicity of metals to animals and plants. Since metals do not degrade, reducing risk of exposure relies in either removing the metals from soil, or changing their speciation which leads to changes in bioavailability, mobility and toxicity. Plants have been shown to provide a cheap alternative to chemical methods for both removing and changing metal speciation, particularly when augmented with plant growth promoting bacteria. The focus of this thesis was to investigate whether the form (speciation) in which a metal contaminant is introduced to soil affects both plant health and the efficiency of metal remediation by the plant, using the well-known hyperaccumulator Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and zinc (Zn) as the metal contaminant. This study also examined the role of plant growth promoting bacteria in changing metal speciation, impact on metal toxicity and phytoremediation efficiency. Brassica juncea was grown in pots containing soil spiked with equal amounts (600 mg Zn kg-1) of soluble Zn (ZnSO4) and nanoparticulate ZnS and ZnO. Plant height, number of leaves, root length, plant biomass and chlorophyll content of Brassica juncea were used to assess Zn toxicity. Zn localisation and speciation in soil and plant tissues was studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), synchrotron micro-X-ray fluorescence elemental mapping (μXRF) and synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Growth parameters showed that ZnSO4 was the most toxic form of Zn whilst ZnS and ZnO effects were not statistically different. These differences were linked to differences in Zn content in root and shoot biomass, which was higher in ZnSO4 treatments. Inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum and Pseudomonas brassicacearum enhanced plant growth, Zn concentration in plant biomass and translocation of Zn in all Zn treatments. XAS analysis showed that Zn speciation was altered in roots of plants inoculated with bacteria, with Zn cysteine as the most dominant form of Zn in all inoculated Zn treatments, suggesting a role for cysteine in ameliorating Zn toxicity. By also assessing Zn speciation changes across the soilrhizosphere- plant interface, this study established that Rhizobium leguminosarum modified Zn speciation at the rhizosphere. Through this thesis work, metal speciation is a major factor in determining the efficiency of metal phytoremediation and plant tolerance. Hence, this research provides useful information on Zn speciation which will contribute to effective implementation of Zn phytoremediation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Stewart, Allan Howard. "Suppression of verticillium wilt in potatoes with a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq24925.pdf.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Promoting plant growth"

1

Subramaniam, Gopalakrishnan, Sathya Arumugam, and Vijayabharathi Rajendran, eds. Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Egamberdieva, Dilfuza, Smriti Shrivastava, and Ajit Varma, eds. Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13401-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

service), SpringerLink (Online, ed. Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Maheshwari, Dinesh K., ed. Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Dighton, John, and Jennifer Adams Krumins, eds. Interactions in Soil: Promoting Plant Growth. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8890-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Singh, Harikesh Bahadur, Chetan Keswani, M. S. Reddy, Estibaliz Sansinenea, and Carlos García-Estrada, eds. Secondary Metabolites of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizomicroorganisms. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5862-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Kumar, Ashok, and Vijay Singh Meena, eds. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Agricultural Sustainability. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7553-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Arteca, Richard N. Plant growth substances: Principles and applications. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1996.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Katsy, Elena I., ed. Plasticity in Plant-Growth-Promoting and Phytopathogenic Bacteria. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9203-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Reddy, P. Parvatha. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Horticultural Crop Protection. New Delhi: Springer India, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1973-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Promoting plant growth"

1

Senthilraja, G. "Induction of Systemic Resistance in Crop Plants Against Plant Pathogens by Plant Growth-Promoting Actinomycetes." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 193–202. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_12.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Altaf, Mohd Musheer, and Mohd Sajjad Ahmad Khan. "Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria." In Microbial Biofilms, 161–74. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2020.: CRC Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780367415075-10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lynch, James M. "Plant Growth-Promoting Agents." In Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting, 391–96. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/9781555817770.ch34.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Nimaichand, Salam, Asem Mipeshwaree Devi, and Wen-Jun Li. "Direct Plant Growth-Promoting Ability of Actinobacteria in Grain Legumes." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 1–16. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Solans, M., G. Vobis, L. Jozsa, and L. G. Wall. "Synergy of Actinomycete Co-inoculation." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 161–77. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Nascimento, Francisco X., Márcio J. Rossi, and Bernard R. Glick. "Role of ACC Deaminase in Stress Control of Leguminous Plants." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 179–92. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Grover, Minakshi, Shrey Bodhankar, M. Maheswari, and Ch Srinivasarao. "Actinomycetes as Mitigators of Climate Change and Abiotic Stress." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 203–12. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Taj, Z. Zarin, and M. Rajkumar. "Perspectives of Plant Growth-Promoting Actinomycetes in Heavy Metal Phytoremediation." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 213–31. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_14.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Subramanian, K. S., Iniyakumar Muniraj, and Sivakumar Uthandi. "Role of Actinomycete-Mediated Nanosystem in Agriculture." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 233–47. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sharma, Mamta, Avijit Tarafdar, and Raju Ghosh. "Use of Genomic Approaches in Understanding the Role of Actinomycetes as PGP in Grain Legumes." In Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria, 249–62. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1_16.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Promoting plant growth"

1

Burygin, G. L., K. Yu Kargapolova, Yu V. Krasova, and O. V. Tkachenko. "PLANT RESPONSES TO FLAGELLINS OF PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA." In The All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation and Schools of Young Scientists "Mechanisms of resistance of plants and microorganisms to unfavorable environmental". SIPPB SB RAS, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31255/978-5-94797-319-8-1203-1205.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

"Potential of ribonuclease-sinthesizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant defence against viruses." In Current Challenges in Plant Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Biotechnology. Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Novosibirsk State University, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18699/icg-plantgen2019-24.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Sharma, Meha. "A Crosstalk Between Brachypodium Root Exudates, Organic Acids and Bacillus velezensis B26, a Growth Promoting Bacterium." In ASPB PLANT BIOLOGY 2020. USA: ASPB, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46678/pb.20.1052034.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Yegorenkova, I. V., K. V. Tregubova, and V. V. Ignatov. "HYDROLYTIC EXOENZYMES OF THE PLANT-GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIUM PAENIBACILLUS POLYMYXA." In The All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation and Schools of Young Scientists "Mechanisms of resistance of plants and microorganisms to unfavorable environmental". SIPPB SB RAS, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31255/978-5-94797-319-8-293-296.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Wackerow-Kouzova, N. "SCREENING OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING TRAITS IN CULTURABLE SOIL AND PLANT-ASSOCIATED HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIA." In 19th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings. STEF92 Technology, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/6.1/s24.050.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

"Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Improved Seedling Growth and Quality of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)." In International Conference on Chemical, Food and Environment Engineering. International Academy Of Arts, Science & Technology, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/iaast.a0115068.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Santosa, Slamet, Edi Purwanto, and Sajidan Suranto. "Sustainability of Organic Agriculture System by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology 2018 (ISET 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iset-18.2018.92.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Voropaeva, O. V., Tripti Tripti, A. Kumar, K. A. Panikovskaya, M. G. Maleva, and G. G. Borisova. "Screening of metal tolerant plant growth-promoting endophytic (PGPE) bacteria for the preparation of bioformulation." In 2nd International Scientific Conference "Plants and Microbes: the Future of Biotechnology". PLAMIC2020 Organizing committee, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.28983/plamic2020.277.

Full text

Abstract:

Metal tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria capable of synthesizing IAA from tryptophan, solubilizing phosphates and converting protein nitrogen into ammonia were isolated from plants growing on contaminated soils.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Disi, Joseph. "Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria treatment reduce oviposition by European corn borer on maize." In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.112931.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Zhu, Ying, Zhiye Wang, Jianyong Wang, Zhaobin Wang, and Jianping Zhou. "Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve shoot morphology and photosynthesis in dryland spring wheat." In 2013 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Engineering. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/icbeee130431.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!