Academic literature on the topic 'Proof of existence of God'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Proof of existence of God.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Proof of existence of God"

1

Spitzer, Robert J. "A Contemporary Metaphysical Proof for the Existence of God." International Philosophical Quarterly 59, no. 4 (2019): 427–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ipq2019594143.

Full text
Abstract:
This five-step metaphysical proof borrows from the metaphysical thought of Aquinas as well as from Bernard Lonergan’s proof of God in Insight. It makes several advances to proofs of God. Most importantly, by showing that an unconditioned (uncaused) reality must be unrestrictedly intelligible, the second step of the proof is original and lays a stronger foundation than previous proofs for the uniqueness of an unconditioned reality as well as its identification with an unrestricted act of thinking. This point strengthens the argument that this unique reality is a creator of everything else in reality. In so doing, it responds to contemporary criticisms of proofs of God by Richard Dawkins and others. This proof also adapts metaphysical ideas and terms to those arising out of the contemporary scientific world view, so that it is relevant and applicable to quantum and relativity theory, quantum cosmology, and other contemporary cosmological ideas, such as a multiverse and multidimensional physical realities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Frank, Semyon. "The proof of the existence of God." Philosophy Journal 10, no. 1 (March 2017): 89–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2017-10-1-89-98.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kalanov, Temur Z. "Theoretical model of God: proof of existence." Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2, no. 3 (March 20, 2009): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2009/v2i3.19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Woodlee, John. "Descriptions of God." Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal 1, no. 1 (September 5, 2019): 8–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.33043/s.1.1.8-15.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper uses the lessons gathered from a brief consideration of the workings of substantive descriptive phrases to develop two objections to Anselm’s ontological proof of God’s existence. First, one’s understanding of the definition of God does not, as Anselm claims, guarantee that God exists in one’s understanding. Second, the proof depends on a flawed interpretation of the denial of God’s existence. The paper concludes by discussing the broader significance of this second objection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bell, Tink R. "A proof of the existence of fairies." Think 6, no. 16 (2008): 45–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1477175600002396.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hatcher, William S. "A Scientific Proof of the Existence of God." Journal of Baha’i Studies 5, no. 4 (1993): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.31581/jbs-5.4.1(1993).

Full text
Abstract:
Of the various systems that we can actually observe in the physical world, some (e.g., the movement of small dust particles suspended in the air) appear to be perfectly random (or chaotic); whereas, others (e.g., the growth of leaved plants) exhibit a high degree of order and structure. Whenever scientists encounter a phenomenon or system that exhibits a significant evolution towards order, but without any observable reason for such movement, they suspect the cause to be the objective action of some unseen force (e.g., the unseen force of gravity that, in the presence of a large mass like the earth, causes the persistent downward movement of unsupported objects). Using this method, modern physics has now validated the existence of at least four basic forces (gravity, the strong and the weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetic force), and continues to examine the possibility that other, hitherto undetected, forces may exist. In 1921 ‘Abdu’l-Bahá presented a cogent scientific argument for the existence of an objective, unseen force as the only reasonable explanation for the phenomenon of biological evolution. In the years since ‘Abdu’l-Bahá’s proof was first published, the findings of science have tended to show that, indeed, the phenomenon of evolution represents a persistent movement from disorder towards order of the kind that strongly suggests the action of some unobservable force different from all other forces so far discovered. In this article, we present a somewhat detailed reformulation of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá’s argument using certain contemporary scientific terms that were not current at the time ‘Abdu’l-Bahá wrote.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gál, Gideon. "Petrus Thomae's Proof for the Existence of God." Franciscan Studies 56, no. 1 (1998): 115–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/frc.1998.0002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hunter, Hugh. "George Berkeley’s proof for the existence of God." International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78, no. 2 (June 17, 2015): 183–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11153-015-9527-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Reat, Noble Ross. "A buddhist proof for the existence of God." Journal of Indian Philosophy 13, no. 3 (September 1985): 265–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00163225.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Vattanky, John. "Proof for the Existence of God in Classical Indian Philosophy." Forum Philosophicum 12, no. 1 (June 1, 2007): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2007.1201.01.

Full text
Abstract:
Both in the East and in the West, there is, apart from the religious approach to God, also a purely rational one. Although in India philosophical speculation on God was mostly inextricably bound to religion, there have also been purely rational developments in Indian Theodicy. This is the case above all in the Nyāyavaiśeṣka system, where we find a purely rational and logical approach to the question of the existence and nature of God. It is the specific contribution of the Nyāyavaiśeṣka system to have developed a purely logical and rational argument for the existence of God. My purpose here is to take this proof in its developed form, as it is found in Gaşgeśa, and investigate its philosophical and logical implications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Proof of existence of God"

1

Hacinebioglu, Ismail Latif. "The logical foundations of the cosmological arguments for the existence of God." Thesis, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.683293.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Houston, Emma. "The Refutation of Existing Proofs for the Existence of God and the Continued Search for a Valid Proof of the Existence of God: A Defense and Interpretation of Kant." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2019. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2113.

Full text
Abstract:
In this thesis, I use Kant's Transcendental Ideal and Fourth Antinomy in the Critique of Pure Reason as a bedrock to understand mistakes in popular spatio-temporal and transcendental proofs for the existence of God and develop a discussion of the necessity of the continued search for, and potential foundation of, an alternative proof of the existence of God. I will first attempt to instill the thought of the necessity of a commitment to the idea of the existence of God. I will then explain and clarify a) the three transcendental proofs for the existence of God and b) what I take to be Kant’s most relevant and substantive refutations of these proofs. After, I will explain and clarify Kant’s perceived failure of spatio-temporal proofs. I then summarize what I consider to be most grave failure of the transcendental proof. Finally, I will assume Kant’s refutation of the ontological proof to be a metaphysical failure and discuss potential solutions to the current issues of proofs for the existence of God.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Maboungou, Christophe Westar. "Les relectures de l'argument ontologique dans L'Action de Maurice Blondel (1861-1949) : enjeux et originalité." Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes (ComUE), 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015GREAP001.

Full text
Abstract:
Cette thèse se fixe comme tâche d’examiner la manière originale et inédite par laquelle Maurice Blondel revisite les preuves classiques de l’existence de Dieu, principalement, l’argument ontologique. Cet argument occupe, chez notre auteur, une place prépondérante, et constitue un moment essentiel dans le développement de sa doctrine. C’est une approche qui se comprend comme un retour à une doctrine ancienne (Cf. l’argument d’Anselme), mais en même temps comme une élaboration originale. De ce point de vue, la lecture suivie de L’Action laisse entrevoir trois axes d’interprétations de l’argument ontologique que notre thèse entend mettre en lumière.D’abord, Blondel relit les preuves de l’existence de Dieu dans la perspective de la dialectique de la volonté dont elles amorcent le « troisième moment » conflictuel, avant que le conflit ne se résolve en alternative ou en option. Car, il y a toujours une inadéquation entre ce qui est voulu et le dynamisme qui, en nous, est le principe du vouloir c’est-à-dire entre ce qu’il appelle la volonté voulue et la volonté voulante. En conséquence, c’est en vue de l’Unique nécessaire que Blondel ébauche une synergie des preuves et renouvelle, en quelque sorte, l’argument ontologique pour montrer que chaque homme y est inévitablement embarqué.Ensuite le recours « à un inconnu inaccessible, dont la présence est pourtant pressentie sans être encore reconnue » ou la référence explicite à des expressions apophatiques pour parler de l’Être ou de l’Absolu manifeste clairement un recours symptomatique à la théologie négative comme il le reconnaît, à la suite du Pseudo-Denys que « l’affirmation est moins juste, et la négation plus vraie », et d’autant plus qu’il ajoute : « c’est le néant qui le confesse ». Or, cette donnée n’affaiblit en rien la pertinence de la preuve, car Blondel en fait une véritable expérience spirituelle.Enfin la conséquence qu’il tire de cette relecture, en insistant sur la portée philosophique de l’option, constitue le lieu privilégié qui confirme bien que cette approche n’a pas pour visée la pleine possession de l’Être, mais une ouverture, une préparation nécessaire de notre indigence à admettre et à affirmer cette existence de Dieu. Car, pour chaque existence, « cette preuve est, moins une vue qu’une vie » et que suivant une influence de la preuve cartésienne « celle-ci n’est absolue que là où il y a idée parfaite de la perfection même, là où l’essence est réelle et l’existence idéale. Dans ces conditions, l’idée de Dieu, de l’Être est comme réfractée, conditionnée, obscurcie par notre imperfection. Cependant, elle nous contraint à affirmer, du lieu où somme toute elle n’est pas, sa réalité, sa perfection.À partir d’une reconsidération des articulations de la preuve dans L’Action, notre thèse aura eu comme tâche d’élucider la portée et la pertinence de ces trois axes qui constituent l’originalité de la lecture blondélienne de l’argument ontologique
This thesis has set itself the task of reviewing the new and original way in which Maurice Blondel revisits the classic proofs of God’s existence, mainly, the ontological argument. This argument holds, in our author, a prominent place, and is a key moment in the development of his doctrine. It is an approach that makes sense as a return to an old doctrine (See the Anselm’s argument ), but at the same time as an original development. From this point of view, reading followed by L’Action suggests three lines of interpretations of the ontological argument that our thesis intends to highlight.Firstly, Blondel reread the proofs of God’s existence from the perspective of the dialectic of the will they begin the third time conflict before the conflict will be resolved in alternative or optional. Because, there is always a mismatch between what is wanted and dynamism which, in us, is the principle of the will that is to say between what he calls the necessary will and determination voulante. Consequently, it is for the One need Blondel draft synergy evidence and renewed, in a way, the ontological argument to show that every man is inevitably embedded.Then use an inaccessible stranger, whose presence is sensed without being yet still recognized or the explicit reference to apophatiques expressions to speak of Being or the Absolute manifests clearly symptomatic use of negative theology as acknowledges, following the Pseudo-Dionysius that “the statement is less just, and truest denial”, and especially as he adds, “ it is the nothingness that confess.” However , this data does not weaken in any way the relevance of the evidence , because Blondel makes a truly spiritual experience.Finally he draws the consequence of this replay, emphasizing the philosophical significance of the option, which is the central authority confirms that this approach has not referred to the full possession of Being, but an opening, a necessary preparation to admit our poverty and affirm the existence of God. For each existence, " the evidence is less a view that a life " and following the influence of the Cartesian evidence " it is absolute that where there is perfect idea of perfection , there where gasoline is real and the ideal existence . In these circumstances, the idea of God, of Being is refracted as conditioned , darkened by our imperfection . However, it forces us to state , after all, the place where it is not , its reality, its perfection.From a reconsideration of the joints of proof in L'Action, our thesis has had the task of clarifying the scope and relevance of these three areas which constitute the originality of the Blondel reading the ontological argument
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Siqueira, Cassiano Medeiros. "Deus e o primeiro motor movente : uma análise lógica da primeira via de Tomás de Aquino." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/71940.

Full text
Abstract:
Entre as cinco provas da existência de Deus que Tomás de Aquino apresentou na Summa Theologiae, sobressai a chamada “primeira via”, considerada pelo autor como a “mais manifesta”. Esta dissertação formaliza-a em lógica quantificacional, explicitando cada uma das inferências a fim de julgar sua validade e correção. Depois de explicadas as teses metafísicas que constituem o cenário da discussão — como a doutrina aristotélica das quatro causas e as distinções entre substância e acidente, ato e potência —, são examinadas as objeções de Anthony Kenny (1969) e as sugestões interpretativas de John Wippel (2000) em defesa do raciocínio de Tomás. Mostra-se que a primeira parte, que procura demonstrar a irreflexividade do movimento, é um argumento válido, mas incorreto, por conter uma premissa falsa: aquela que afirma sem restrições a atualidade do movente. Já a segunda parte, o argumento contra o regresso infinito, contém uma ambiguidade que o deixa diante de duas alternativas: ou se trata de uma petição de princípio ou de uma falácia de equivocidade. Dado o fracasso material e formal da prova, é proposta finalmente uma abordagem não-dedutiva do problema.
Among the five proofs of God’s existence presented by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologiae, the so-called "first way" stands out, for being considered by the author as the "most obvious" one. This dissertation formalizes it in quantificational logic, explaining each of the inferences in order to assess its validity and soundness. After explaining the metaphysical theses that provide the backdrop for the discussion — as the doctrine of the four Aristotelian causes and the distinctions between substance and accident, act and potency — it considers the objections of Anthony Kenny (1969) and interpretive suggestions of John Wippel (2000) in defense of Thomas’ reasoning. It is shown that the first part, which seeks to demonstrate the non-reflexivity of movement, is a valid argument, but unsound, because it contains a false premise: the one that states the mover’s actuality without restrictions. The second part, the argument against the infinite regress, contains an ambiguity that leaves you faced with two alternatives: either it begs the question or it is a fallacy of equivocation. Given the material and formal failure of the proof, a non-deductive approach to the problem is finally proposed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

VETTORELLO, LUCA. "L'UNUM ARGUMENTUM DI SANT'ANSELMO. ALLA RICERCA DELL'INTERPRETAZIONE AUTENTICA DELLA PROVA ANSELMIANA DELL'ESISTENZA DI DIO." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/5454.

Full text
Abstract:
Contro l’argomento anselmiano del Proslogion sono state sollevate varie obiezioni, come quelle, molto note, di Gaunilone, di san Tommaso e di Kant. In questo saggio si sostiene la tesi che tutte queste critiche si basano fondamentalmente su una interpretazione imprecisa del testo di Anselmo che, se correttamente letto, ne risulta invece al riparo. Viene quindi offerta una nuova lettura dell’unum argumentum, con la quale, ricercandone lo spirito originario e più autentico, viene messa in risalto innanzitutto la sua struttura formale di dimostrazione per assurdo, illustrando in secondo luogo l’importante rapporto di complementarità che lega questa tipologia di prova a quelle strutturate in modo diverso, che procedono cioè a posteriori per costruzione diretta.
Many important Authors – as Gaunilo, Thomas Aquinas and Kant – have brought many well-known objections against the anselmian argument. This paper proposes the thesis that all these objections are based on an inaccurate interpretation of the Proslogion: in fact, an in-depth analysis of the text shows its fully validity. Therefore, it is offered a new reading of the anselmian argument, that looks for its original and authentic sense: firstly, it is enlightened its formal structure of proof by contradiction, and secondly it is showed its important complementary relationship with the other kind of a posteriori proofs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Durston, Kirk. "Apparently unjustified evil and the existence of God." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/mq23293.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Holt, William Ian. "Proof of Existence and Uniqueness of Simple Root Systems, Clarified." OpenSIUC, 2020. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2797.

Full text
Abstract:
Humphreys (1990) defines a simple root system for a finite reflection group which is an important concept fundamental to the understanding of reflection groups as well as Coxeter complexes and Coxeter groups. The proof that Humphreys uses to establish the existence and uniqueness of these systems follows an indirect method that left portions of the proof as exercises to the reader. I present a more complete and direct proof using different organization and methods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kessler, Volker. "Ist die Existenz Gottes beweisbar? Eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung von neuen Gottesbeweisen = Can we prove that God exists? : An interdisciplinary investigation of new theistic proofs /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1998. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Chan, Man Ho. "The fine-tuned universe and the existence of God." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2017. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/447.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent research in science indicates that we are living in a fine-tuned universe. Only a very small parameter space of universal fundamental constants in Physics is congenial for the existence of life. Moreover, recent studies in Biological evolution also reveal that fine-tuning did exist in the evolution. It seems that we are so lucky to exist as all universal fundamental constants and life-permitting factors really fall into such a very small life-allowing region. This problem is known as the fine-tuning problem. Does this phenomenon need an explanation? Can the fine-tuning problem point to the existence of God? Modern Science invokes the idea of multiverse to address the fine-tuning problem. Some scientists suggest that each universe in a set of infinitely many universes contains a typical set of fundamental constants. We should not be surprised why our universe is fine-tuned because we would not exist if the constants are not the life-allowed values. Some suggest that the existence of God can explain this fine-tuning problem. The naturalistic multiverse theory and the existence of God are the two most robust proposals to address the fine-tuning problem. Moreover, some argue that the fine-tuning problem is not real because we are just subject to observational selection effect. In this thesis, I will provide a comprehensive discussion on the fine-tuning phenomena in our universe. In particular, I will use the confirmation principle and the inference to the best explanation simultaneously to evaluate different hypotheses in a more systematic way and give some of the new and updated scientific and philosophical arguments to respond to the recent criticisms of the fine-tuning arguments. I conclude that the theistic hypothesis is the best among all to address the fine-tuning problem.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Shrock, Christopher A. "C. S. Lewis's moral argument for the existence of God." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2007. http://www.tren.com/search.cfm?p018-0109.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Proof of existence of God"

1

The existence of God: A philosophical introduction. London: Routledge, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Geis, Robert. On the existence of God. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

The non-existence of God. London: Routledge, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the proofs of the existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Fuchs, Jiří. Cesta k důkazu Boží existence. Praha: TRS, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Mendelssohn, Moses. Morning hours: Lectures on God's existence. Dordrecht [the Netherlands]: Springer, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Does God's existence need proof? Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Swinburne, Richard. The existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Swinburne, Richard. The existence of God. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

A case for the existence of God. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Proof of existence of God"

1

Dore, Clement. "A Proof of the Existence of God." In Moral Scepticism, 11–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21331-3_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Brentano, Franz. "Completion of the Proof of the Existence of God." In Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, 302–7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3633-1_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Nolan, Lawrence, and Alan Nelson. "Proofs for the Existence of God." In The Blackwell Guide to Descartes' Meditations, 104–21. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470776476.ch7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Knuuttila, Simo, David Piché, Pieter De Leemans, Stephen F. Brown, Fabrizio Amerini, Ian Wilks, Christopher Schabel, et al. "Proofs of the Existence of God." In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, 1081–86. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_421.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ekenberg, Tomas. "Proofs of the Existence of God." In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, 1608–15. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_421.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Schneider, Jakob Hans Josef. "Looking for God: On Anselm of Canterbury’s Proof of the Existence of God." In Interdisziplinäre Studien zu Lateinamerika / Interdisciplinary Studies on Latin America / Estudios interdisciplinarios sobre América Latina., 109–24. Göttingen: V&R unipress, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.14220/9783737012904.109.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hodgson, Peter C. "Hegel's Proofs of the Existence of God." In A Companion to Hegel, 414–29. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444397161.ch20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mendelssohn, Moses, Daniel O. Dahlstrom, and Corey Dyck. "Elucidation of the concepts of necessity, contingency, independence, and dependence. – Attempt at a new proof for the existence of God on the basis of the incompleteness of self-knowledge." In Studies in German Idealism, 101–7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0418-3_16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Messer, Richard. "God and Religious Language." In Does God’s Existence Need Proof?, 4–29. Oxford University Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198269717.003.0002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cunning, David. "Another Proof of the Existence of God." In Argument and Persuasion in Descartes’ Meditations, 143–68. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195399608.003.0006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Proof of existence of God"

1

Ordentlich, Or, and Uri Erez. "A simple proof for the existence of “good” pairs of nested lattices." In 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel (IEEEI 2012). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/eeei.2012.6376989.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chopra, Kriti, Kunal Gupta, and Annu Lambora. "Proof of Existence Using Blockchain." In 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/comitcon.2019.8862441.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Muzakki, Akhmad, and Marzuqi. "The Tautological Language Style of the Qur’an on God Existence." In International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (ICONETOS 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210421.036.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Coman, Iacob. "Transcendence as Objective Argument of the Existence of the Personal God." In The concepts of "transcendence" and "immanence" in the Philosophy and Theology. EDIS - Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina, Slovak Republic, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/dialogo.2015.2.2.7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Chiliveri, Sireesha, Jyostna Grandhi, Mahesh Uttam Patil, Lakshmi Eswari P.R., and Magesh Ethirajan. "ProveDoc: A Blockchain Based Proof of Existence with Proof of Storage." In 2019 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icit48102.2019.00049.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Perera, Tharangana, Sithija Piyuman Thewa Hettige, Shadhini A. P. Jayatilake, Wickramaranga Abeygunawardhana, and H. M. N. Dilum Bandara. "Blockchain-Based Product Traceability Beyond Proof of Existence." In 2020 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mercon50084.2020.9185207.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe. "The name "Immanuel" = "God with us", a proof of God�s immanence, according to the religious vision of the American author Ellen G.White." In The concepts of "transcendence" and "immanence" in the Philosophy and Theology. EDIS - Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina, Slovak Republic, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/dialogo.2015.2.2.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nowakiewicz, Michal. "A path non-existence proof in motion planning using CUDA." In 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aim.2010.5695782.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Shawn, Lim Wei Ming, Purnima Murali Mohan, Peter Loh Kok Keong, and Vivek Balachandran. "Blockchain-based Proof of Existence (PoE) Framework using Ethereum Smart Contracts." In CODASPY '21: Eleventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3422337.3450319.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Qi, Renming, Chen Feng, and Yu-Chih Huang. "A simpler proof for the existence of capacity-achieving nested lattice codes." In 2017 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itw.2017.8277953.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Proof of existence of God"

1

Eftekharinasab, Kaveh. A Simple Proof of the Short-time Existence and Uniqueness for Ricci Flow. "Prof. Marin Drinov" Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, May 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2019.05.01.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography