Academic literature on the topic 'Proportionality principal'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Proportionality principal.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Proportionality principal"
Baker, Dennis J. "Complicity, Proportionality, and the Serious Crime Act." New Criminal Law Review 14, no. 3 (2011): 403–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2011.14.3.403.
Full textAl-Hakim, Mohamad, and Susan Dimock. "Hate as an Aggravating Factor in Sentencing." New Criminal Law Review 15, no. 4 (2012): 572–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2012.15.4.572.
Full textDing, Libo, Bangyi Li, and Suling Feng. "Research on Multiprincipals Selecting Effective Agency Mode in the Student Loan System." Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2014 (2014): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/835254.
Full textLima, MSCS, and J. Pederassi. "Morphometrics and ratio of body proportionality of tadpoles of Rhinella icterica (Anura, Bufonidae) at different developmental stages." Brazilian Journal of Biology 72, no. 3 (August 2012): 623–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842012000300028.
Full textLiu, Shu Li, Takamoto Itoh, and Noriyuki Fujii. "Visualization of Multiaxial Stress/Strain State and Evaluation of Failure Life by Developed Analyzing Program under Non-Proportional Loading." Advanced Materials Research 891-892 (March 2014): 1391–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.891-892.1391.
Full textMoon, Richard. "Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis." Israel Law Review 50, no. 1 (February 9, 2017): 49–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223716000327.
Full textStone Sweet, Alec. "Investor-State Arbitration: Proportionality's New Frontier." Law & Ethics of Human Rights 4, no. 1 (April 30, 2010): 48–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1044.
Full textMosquera, Juan Carlos Velasquez, Juan David Corrales Álvarez, and Carolina Bespalhok Jacometo. "Morphofunctional characteristics of working mules in mountain areas of the Colombian Central Andes." Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 42 (September 30, 2019): e46379. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.46379.
Full textKleffner, Jann K. "Section IX of the ICRC Interpretive Guidance on Direct Participation in Hostilities: The End of Jus in Bello Proportionality as We Know It?" Israel Law Review 45, no. 1 (March 2012): 35–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223711000069.
Full textKilcommins, Shane. "The victim in the Irish criminal process: a journey from dispossession towards partial repossession." Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 68, no. 4 (December 21, 2017): 505–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v68i4.61.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Proportionality principal"
Pino, Giorgio. "Fundamental rights and the proportionality principle." Derecho & Sociedad, 2017. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/118697.
Full textEl artículo evalúa el uso generalizado de la prueba de proporcionalidad en la adjudicación de derechos fundamentales. Mientras que los tribunales constitucionales y de derechos humanos de todo el mundo parecen estar constantemente involucrados en el despliegue de la prueba de proporcionalidad para evaluar la permisibilidad de una determinada limitación de derechos, este enfoque está sometido a severas críticas en tanto que se considera un ataque a la idea misma de Derechos fundamentales. El artículo discutirá esta crítica al uso del principio de proporcionalidad y ofrecerá una defensa de su uso por los tribunales a la luz de algunas características básicas del discurso contemporáneo de los derechos fundamentales.
Emiliou, Nicholas. "The principle of proportionality in European law : a comparative study." The Hague : Kluwer law international, 1996. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb37739803k.
Full textAcaralp, Linnéa. "U.S. Drone Attacks and the Proportionality Principle : Growing ignorance or Consciousness?" Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157224.
Full textCooper, Margaret Alice. "The principle of proportionality and precision weapons in the law of armed conflict." Thesis, University of Surrey, 2018. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/848696/.
Full textAguilar, Valdez Oscar Rafael. "¿Regulation or competition? The case of the Argentine Law of Audiovisual Communications Services and the Proportionality Principle as a delimiting criterion." Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2016. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/115722.
Full textEn este trabajo se pretende señalar la importancia del principio de proporcionalidad como un criterio jurídico válido para determinar cuándo una determinada industria debe ser regulada de modo sectorial y ex ante o cuando resulta preferible hacerlo mediante modalidades menos intrusivas como, por ejemplo, el régimen de defensa de la competencia. A estos efectos, se utilizará como ejemplo lo ocurrido en la República Argentina con la Ley de Servicios de Comunicación Audiovisual y su tratamiento por la Corte Suprema de Justicia en el caso del Grupo Clarín.
Leonaitė, Erika. "Principle of Proportionality in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights." Doctoral thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2013. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2013~D_20130925_093005-25212.
Full textDisertacijoje nagrinėjama proporcingumo principo, kaip iš demokratinės visuomenės idėjos kylančio instrumento, Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismo (EŽTT) pasitelkiamo siekiant nustatyti, ar nacionalinės institucijos išlaikė teisingą pusiausvyrą tarp konkuruojančių Žmogaus teisių ir pagrindinių laisvių apsaugos konvencijos (Konvencijos) ginamų teisių ar tarp Konvencijos teisių ir viešų interesų, sampratos ir taikymo praktikos problematika. Pirmoje disertacijos dalyje, aptarus proporcingumo principo kilmę, trinario proporcingumo tyrimo modelio susiformavimą ir sklaidą, apsibrėžiami svarbiausi proporcingumo tyrimui reikšmingi parametrai ir atskleidžiama EŽTT taikomo proporcingumo principo sampratos problematika mokslinėje literatūroje. Antroje dalyje nagrinėjama proporcingumo principo taikymo EŽTT praktikoje raida ir plėtra, identifikuojami pagrindiniai ankstyvojoje Komisijos ir Teismo praktikoje taikyto proporcingumo testo bruožai. Trečioje dalyje tiriama proporcingumo principo sąveika su subsidiarumo principu, atskleidžiamas vertinimo laisvės doktrinos poveikis EŽTT atliekamam proporcingumo vertinimui, tiriami vertinimo laisvės apimtį lemiantys kriterijai ir jų sąveika. Ketvirtoje dalyje analizuojama proporcingumo principo taikymo praktika skirtingų Konvencijos ginamų teisių kontekste, atskleidžiant tiek bendruosius principo taikymo bruožus, tiek ir Teismo taikomos priežiūros intensyvumo nulemtus proporcingumo testo ypatumus. Paskutinėje dalyje EŽTT taikomas balansavimu grindžiamas... [toliau žr. visą tekstą]
Ingelsson, Filip. "En arbetsmarknad för äldre arbetstagare? : -Om åldersdiskriminering riktad mot äldre i arbetslivet." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för ekonomistyrning och logistik (ELO), 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-33436.
Full textUppsatsen har till syfte att redogöra för åldersdiskriminering riktad mot äldre personer iarbetslivet. Åldersdiskrimineringen redogörs genom att studera EU-rätt samt nationell rätt och se gränsen för åldersdiskriminering. En bild av bestämmelserna ska presenteras för att visa hur arbetsgivare har en möjlighet att kringgå förbudet mot åldersdiskriminering. Vad som även belyses är hur åldersdiskriminering kan komma att aktualiseras vid en rekryteringsprocess och vad som således kan motverka att åldersdiskriminering uppstår. Uppsatsen är baserad på material inom rättskällehierarkin samt litteratur, internet källor och rapporter som har en koppling till ämnesvalet. Materialet är sedan analyserat utifrån rättsdogmatisk metod samt rättssociologisk metod. Analysen resulterar i förbudet mot diskriminering p.g.a. ålder är en grundläggande rättighet. Problematiken kring åldersdiskriminering uppstår när undantagsmöjligheterna ska tolkas och tillämpas. Där finns ett utrymme för arbetsgivare att kringgå förbudet när arbetstagare är fyllda67 år. Dessutom går det att kringgå förbudet om det är oproportionerligt kostsamt för arbetsgivaren att anställa en äldre person som snart närmar sig pensionsåldern. Dock stämmer inte sistnämnda hypotes, sett till hur arbetsmarknaden och individens yrkeskarriär ser ut i dag. Åldersdiskriminering i en rekryteringsprocess består till stor del av omedvetna eller medvetna föreställningar om äldre personer. Orsakerna till föreställningarna är hur samhällets pensions- och rättssystem är uppbyggt samt människors värderingar och normer. Resultatet av dessa föreställningar blir ofrivillig pensionering av äldre personer i samhället för att de gallras bort i rekryteringsprocessen. För att motverka åldersdiskriminering i en rekryteringsprocess behöver lagstiftaren införa bestämmelser om ytterligare aktiva åtgärder i samverkan mellan arbetsgivare och arbetstagare. Dessutom borde pensionssystemet samt 67 årsregeln omarbetas då rådande bestämmelser inte överensstämmer med samhällets funktionssätt. Åtgärderna är ett sätt att främja likamöjligheter och rättigheter i arbetslivet och att öka chanserna till anställning för äldre.
MARTINS, ALISSON SILVA. "THE PROHIBITION OF ILLEGAL EVIDENCES IN THE PROCESS AND THE INAPPLICABILITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2010. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=18695@1.
Full textThe Republic Constitution of 1988 expressly forbade the possible use of illegal evidences in all proceedings (art. 5, LVI). This is a fundamental right – which has been positivised through a rule of structure - which cannot be loosened by the impact of the principle of proportionality. The goal of this dissertation is to demonstrate that the principle of proportionality, on the fence of use of illegal evidences, overthrows the normative power of the Constitution, it converts the fundamental guarantee into an empty promise and unable to be fulfilled. The work also aims to demonstrate that the implementation of criminal justice depends on the inspection of the occurrence of facts which really support and make possible to apply the penal incriminating precept, but such verification activity is usually restricted in order to spare other values which are also protected by the constitution. This is a literature research which aims to show the main strands the above theme, which brings as a conclusion that the principle of proportionality is inapplicable when illegal evidences are found in any proceedings.
Langfeldt, Lasse. "Proportionality in Investment Treaty Arbitration and the Necessity for Tribunals to Adopt a Clear Methodology." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384506.
Full textLinne, Andrea. "Le principe de proportionnalité dans les relations spécifiques d'autorité : une étude comparative des ordres juridiques allemand, français, européens (Convention européenne des droits de l'Homme et communautaire) et secondairement anglais." Thesis, Paris 1, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA010277.
Full textCertain people categories (military, civil servants, students …) are in a special authority relationship which limits « naturally » the exercice of certain fundamental rights. This natural « limitation » is based on their special status condition and conflicts directly with the fundamental rights guaranteeing liberties « naturally ». The principle of proportionality offers the judge a powerful corrective tool to resolve this conflict. Yet the principle of proportionality itself raises un certain number of problems : created by the judge, its conditions are vague and undetermined shifting the competence to the judiciary. Extending his own competence, the principle of proporionality enables the judge to solve this conflict by developping a vast argumentation without necessarily searching a conciliation between antinomic positions
Books on the topic "Proportionality principal"
Steiner, Eva. Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790884.003.0011.
Full textCohen, Amichai, and David Zlotogorski. Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197556726.001.0001.
Full textStone Sweet, Alec, and Jud Mathews. Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841395.001.0001.
Full textKreß, Claus, and Robert Lawless, eds. Necessity and Proportionality in International Peace and Security Law. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197537374.001.0001.
Full textCraig, Paul. EU Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831655.001.0001.
Full textChristodoulidou, Theodora, and Kalliopi Chainoglou. The Principle of Proportionality from a Jus Ad Bellum Perspective. Edited by Marc Weller. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199673049.003.0056.
Full textN Jansen, Calamita. The Principle of Proportionality and the Problem of Indeterminacy in International Investment Treaties. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law-iic/9780190265779.016.0004.
Full textMargaret M, deGuzman. Part V Fairness and Expeditiousness of ICC Proceedings, 37 Proportionate Sentencing at the ICC. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198705161.003.0037.
Full textHermansson, Jörgen. The Election System. Edited by Jon Pierre. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199665679.013.6.
Full textOber, Josiah, and Barry R. Weingast. The Sparta Game. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190649890.003.0007.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Proportionality principal"
Sieckmann, Jan. "Proportionality as a Universal Human Rights Principle." In Proportionality in Law, 3–24. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89647-2_1.
Full textWeißschnur, Sebastian. "State Intervention and Principle of Proportionality." In The Proportionality of State Intervention, 41–81. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75676-5_3.
Full textBäcker, Carsten. "Limited Balancing: The Principle of Human Dignity and Its Inviolability." In Proportionality, Balancing, and Rights, 85–111. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_4.
Full textSchweizer, Mark. "Nudging and the Principle of Proportionality." In Nudging - Possibilities, Limitations and Applications in European Law and Economics, 93–119. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29562-6_7.
Full textEngle, Eric. "The General Principle of Proportionality and Aristotle." In Aristotle and The Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice, 265–76. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6031-8_15.
Full textWallot, Max. "The Proportionality Principle in the TRIPS Agreement." In MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 213–43. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48107-3_7.
Full textPurnhagen, Kai, and Ellen van Kleef. "Commanding to “Nudge” via the Proportionality Principle?" In Regulating and Managing Food Safety in the EU, 151–67. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77045-1_8.
Full textKöhler, Kai. "A Hirzebruch Proportionality Principle in Arakelov Geometry." In Number Fields and Function Fields—Two Parallel Worlds, 237–68. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4447-4_11.
Full textOstrowska, Marta. "Information Duties Stemming from the Insurance Distribution Directive as an Example of Faulty Application of the Principle of Proportionality." In AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation, 31–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52738-9_2.
Full textBaudenbacher, Carl, and Theresa Haas. "Proportionality as a Fundamental Principle of EEA Law." In The Fundamental Principles of EEA Law, 169–213. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45189-3_9.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Proportionality principal"
Som, Abhijit. "Generalized Reynolds Analogy: An Engineering Prospective of Thermo-Fluid Physics for Heat Exchanger Design." In ASME 2021 Power Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power2021-65820.
Full textMudrecki, Artur. "The Principle of Proportionality in Value Added Tax." In XVI International Scientific Conference "The Optimization of Organization and Legal Solutions concerning Public Revenues and Expenditures in Social Interest". Temida 2, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/oolscprepi.2018.46.
Full textAziz, Haris, Edith Elkind, Piotr Faliszewski, Martin Lackner, and Piotr Skowron. "The Condorcet Principle for Multiwinner Elections: From Shortlisting to Proportionality." In Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/13.
Full textLin, Feifei. "A Study of the Application of Proportionality Principle in Civil Jurisdiction." In 2018 8th International Conference on Social science and Education Research (SSER 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/sser-18.2018.109.
Full textOstrowska, Marta. "PRAVNO REGULISANjE INSURTECH KOMPANIJA – DA LI JE PRINCIP SRAZMERNOSTI ODGOVOR?" In MODERNE TEHNOLOGIJE, NOVI I TRADICIONALNI RIZICI U OSIGURANjU. Association for Insurance Law of Serbia, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xxsav21.049o.
Full textTrykhlib, Kristina. "THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS." In EU 2020 – lessons from the past and solutions for the future. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11899.
Full textAbdullayev, Ya R., and O. O. Karimzada. "The method of determination sizes of electromagnetic devices windings by considering the principle of proportionality." In 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/peoco.2013.6564508.
Full textMurtishcheva, A. O. "Coronavirus restrictions: necessary reaction to pandemic and the observance of proportionality principle (Ukrainian and other countries’ experience)." In EUROPEAN POTENTIAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCE, LEGISLATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE. Baltija Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-040-7-17.
Full textPolukhina, R. "Principle of proportionality as a fundamental principle of the international and european law in the activity of the court of arbitration for sport." In ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ НАУКИ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ. НИЦ «Л-Журнал», 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/lj-31-05-2017-45.
Full textTejomurti, Kukuh, Nurhidayatuloh, and Irawati Handayani. "Application of the Proportionality Principle in the Credit Restructuring Policy for the SMEs Financial Performance During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia." In The 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.352.
Full text