Academic literature on the topic 'Prostatic neoplasms/complications'

Diseases of the urological profile are one of the most important medical and social issues of the modern world. According to various sources, from 50 % to 75 % of men over 50 years old have benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and by the age of 80, BPH is detected in 90 % of the male population. BPH manifests itself with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in most patients. Prostate cancer ranks 2nd or 3rd in the structure of malignant neoplasms in men, and the prevalence of this pathology continues to grow. This trend is associated with an increase in average life expectancy, improved diagnosis of pathologies and early detection of the disease. Risk factors affecting the development of both prostate cancer and BPH include the patient’s age, race, family history, eating habits, the presence or absence of bad habits, and a sedentary lifestyle. Surgical methods for treating prostate cancer include open retropubic prostatectomy and laparoscopic adenomectomy. The «gold standard» of surgical treatment of BPH is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), but the emergence of new endovideosurgical methods (bipolar TURP, transurethral enucleation of the prostate (TUEP) allows to expand the scope of their use and reduce possible complications in the early and late postoperative period.

Dear Editors,We read with interest the article by Di Franco and co-workers (1). The introduction of prostatic magnetic resonance and the relative fusion-biopsy have not yet allowed the expected improvements in prostate biopsy. To our knowledge, there are no works that demonstrate the superiority of fusion techniques on the remaining ultrasound guided prostate biopsies that are still the widely used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Furthemore, these technologies are expensive exams and they are not yet available in all centers, especially in those minors. We work at a “minor” center and we always keep in mind that the goal of prostatic biopsy is the diagnosis and the staging of prostatic neoplasms.. However, it remains uncertain which of the two techniques, transperineal (TP) or transrectal (TR), is superior in terms of detection rate during first biopsy setting. Several studies have compared the prostate cancer detection rate but TR and TP access route in prostatic gland sampling seems to be equivalent in terms of efficiency and complications, as reported by Shen PF et al. (2), despite several methodological limitations recognized in their work. The results reported by Di Franco CA et al. represent the real life experience of most urologists that perform the PB based on their own training experience and available technical devices. From an historical viewpoint, the TP route has been the first one to be used to reach the prostate, both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. To date, because it seems to be more invasive and difficult, the TP route is less used worldwide than the TR one (2). Theoretically, the TP approach should detect more prostate cancer than the TR way because the cores of the TP approach are directed longitudinally to the peripheral zone and the anterior part of the prostate (4). The results reported by Di Franco et al. seems to confirm these considerations. However, our real life experience differ from the conclusions reached in their work. We recently conducted a prospective evaluation of 352 patients who underwent their first prostate biopsy because of a suspicious of prostate cancer (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and/or abnormal findings on transrectal prostatic ultrasound). Patients was randomized as following. A total of 187 patients (Group A) underwent a prostatic biopsy with a transperineal approach in a lithotomic position, using a biplane probe (8818 BK Medical, Denmark) and a fan technique with a single perineal median access (5). The remnants 165 patients (Group B) underwent a transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in a left lateral position, using a end fire probe configuration (8818 BK Medical, Denmark) and a sagittal technique. The bioptic prostatic mapping was performed with a 12-core scheme sec. Gore (3) by a single experienced operator and the histopathologic evaluation was performed by a single dedicated uro-pathologist. Statistical evaluations were made with a T Student test (p<0,005). Group A and Group B was similar in term of mean patient age (67,9 years and 67 years respectively), mean total PSA (12,1 ng/ml vs 12 ng/ml) and digital rectal examination positivity (22% vs 29%). The global cancer detection rate was 33,69% (63/187) in the transperineal prostate biopsy group and 48,48 % (80/165) in the transrectal approach (p=0.0047). No significant statistical differences were found in the complications rates between the two groups. Statistical evaluation of site of tumor localization reveal only a trend to statistical significance in apical site tumors diagnosed with the TR approach versus the TP technique. The TR approach had a better diagnostic accuracy than TP technique in case of PSA<4 ng/ml, intermediate prostate volume (30 and 50 ml), normal digital rectal examination without any relationship with the patient age. In our experience, two aspect may explain the difference between the two group in term of global detection rate. First, we usually perform transrectal biopsy with a sagittal technique that simulates the transperineal way of needle incidence with the prostatic gland. The lateral and anterior gland portions may be sampled more accurately. Second, our transperineal approach consists in a single perineal median access that can make more difficult the gland sampling between the two lobes. However, there was no significant difference in core positivity rate at the peripheral zone, medium gland, apex or any other site such as reported in many randomized clinical trials (2). Unlike the conclusions reported by Di Franco et al., in our experience we found a statistically significant difference between the TR and TP approach, at the first biopsy setting, in term of global cancer detection rate. No differences were found in terms of complications. Moreover, our data suggest that TR approach had a better diagnostic accuracy than TP technique in case of PSA<4 ng/ml, prostate volume 30-50 ml, normal digital rectal examination without any relationship with the patient age. The further step of the statistical evaluation of our data will be the definition of the possibility that the TR biopsy determine a better staging of prostate cancer than TP approach as first procedure. REFERENCES 1) Di Franco CA, Jallous H., Porru D. et al. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer Arch Ital Urol Androl 2017; 89(1), 55-92) Shen FP, Zhu YC, Wei WR et al. The results of transperineal vs transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Androl 2012; 14: 310-15.3) Gore JL., Shariat SF, Miles BJ., et al. Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 165: 1554-59. 4) Abdollah F., Novara G., Briganti A. et al. Trasrectal versus transperineal saturation re biopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Urology 2011; 77:9215) Novella G, Ficarra V, Galfano A, et al. Pain assessment after original transperineal prostate biopsy using a coaxial needle. Urology. 2003; 62 : 689-92.

Introduction. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a neoplasm and clinically occurred by progressive enlargement of the prostate. However, prostate neoplasm can also be malignant, which is come out from high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). It is a proven precancerous condition. Purpose. Тo evaluate the data published on September and October 2020 on the prevalence, pathogenesis of BPH and PIN and methods of their treatment. Materials and methods. The search results in scientific databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase were analyzed for the queries «BPH», «PIN», «epidemiology of BPH», «pathogenesis», «treatment of PIN». Results. BPH is a very common disease in the elderly population. The pathogenesis of BPH includes age, genetics or hormones disorders, growth factors, inflammation, and lifestyle factors. PIN is the only common precursor of prostatic cancer. The main treatment methods are 5α-reductase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and surgical methods. In addition, plant active molecules are also widely used in the treatment of BPH and PIN. Conclusions. While 5α-reductase and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors treatment, as well as surgical methods have a lot of adverse events and complications, a unique herbal complex Gardaprost was developed, which suppresses hyperplasia of prostate. Curcumin, genistein and epigalocatechin-3- gallate, which are part of the preparation, form a safe agent aimed at combating the growth of the prostate gland in BPH, and also has a significant effect in the prevention of exacerbations of chronic prostatitis and malignancy in patients with PIN.

ObjectiveSpeculation remains that GH treatment is associated with increased neoplasia risk. Studies in GH-treated childhood cancer survivors suggested higher rates of second neoplasms, while cancer risk data for GH-treated and untreated hypopituitary adults have been variable. We present primary cancer risk data from the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study (HypoCCS) with a focus on specific cancers, and assessment of recurrence rates for pituitary adenomas (PA) and craniopharyngiomas (CP).DesignIncident neoplasms during HypoCCS were evaluated in 8418 GH-treated vs 1268 untreated patients for primary malignancies, 3668 GH-treated vs 720 untreated patients with PA history, and 956 GH-treated vs 102 untreated patients with CP history.MethodsUsing population cancer rates, standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for all primary cancers, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Neoplasm rates in GH-treated vs untreated patients were analysed after propensity score adjustment of baseline treatment group imbalances.ResultsDuring mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 225 primary cancers were identified in GH-treated patients, with SIR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71–0.93). SIRs (95% CI) for GH-treated patients were 0.59 (0.36–0.90) for breast, 0.80 (0.57–1.10) for prostate, and 0.62 (0.38–0.96) for colorectal cancers. Cancer risk was not statistically different between GH-treated and untreated patients (relative risk (RR)=1.00 (95% CI 0.70–1.41), P=0.98). Adjusted RR for recurrence was 0.91 (0.68–1.22), P=0.53 for PA and 1.32 (0.53–3.31), P=0.55 for CP.ConclusionsThere was no increased risk for all-site cancers: breast, prostate or colorectal primary cancers in GH-treated patients during HypoCCS. GH treatment did not increase the risk of PA and CP recurrences.

Human schistosomiasis, the second most devastating parasitic disease, is common in developing countries, but rare in Europe. Urogenital tract involvement is mainly due to Schistosoma haematobium infection. Schistosomiasis has long been associated with malignant neoplasia. Some authors have hypothesized a causal relationship between schistosomiasis and carcinoma of the bowel, kidney, bladder and prostate. To data only 17 cases of concomitant prostatic adenocarcinoma and gland schistosomiasis have been described. As an uncommon example of a potential complication of an untreated schistosomiasis, we report a case of an incidentally diagnosed urinary schistosomiasis after a radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma in a 62-year-old African man living in a non-endemic area.

An 11-year-old male American Bulldog was presented for hematuria and tenesmus. It had been treated for chronic bacterial prostatitis with abscessation two years earlier and underwent castration and a prostatic omentalization procedure. There was no histologic evidence of prostatic neoplasia at that time. On physical examination, an enlarged prostate was found by rectal palpation, and it was characterized with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Surgical biopsies were obtained, and histopathology identified prostatic adenocarcinoma. It received carprofen and mitoxantrone chemotherapy in addition to palliative radiation therapy; it was euthanized six weeks later due to a progression of clinical signs. Necropsy findings included marked localized expansion of the prostatic tumor and dissemination of prostatic carcinoma cells throughout the peritoneal cavity along the omental graft with infiltration onto the serosal surfaces of most abdominal viscera and fat. This case represents a previously unreported potential complication of the omentalization procedure wherein carcinoma cells from a prostatic tumor that independently arose after omentalization may have metastasized along the surgically created omental graft.

Abstract Introduction/Objective Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is minimally invasive procedure for diagnosis/staging/restaging of lung nodules, recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines. Veteran patients are an elderly patient cohort with multiple comorbidities and many have existing known 2nd malignancy. It will be crucial to diagnose and appropriately stage lung nodules. Our primary aim was to assess the efficacy of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosis/nodal staging in elderly patients with known 2nd malignancy. Our secondary aim was to evaluate the safety of this procedure for veterans. Methods A retrospective search for cases of EBUS-TBNA in patients with known second malignancy was carried out in Vista/Fileman at the Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center between the period of June 2019 to January 2020. Sites included lung, cervical lymph nodes, mediastinum and hilar region. Results Of total 93 EBUS-TBNA procedures performed; EBUS-TBNA targeted both the lung and lymph node (62 cases), lymph nodes alone (28 cases) and only lung (3 cases). Total 53 were diagnosed malignant; with primary being lung (39 cases) and pleura (2 cases); and diagnosis of new metastatic carcinomas to lung was made in (12 cases). The metastatic neoplasms included 2 urothelial carcinoma, 7 squamous carcinoma, 2 metastatic adenocarcinoma, and 1 prostatic adenocarcinoma. 32/53 (60.3%) had the history of prior extrapulmonary second malignancy. Immunohistochemical studies was able to be performed in 50/53 (94%) of malignant cases, predictive marker PD-L1 on 50/53 (94%) cases, molecular testing on 23/53(43.3%) cases and Foundation One testing (Cambridge, MA, NGS) on 11/53(20.7%) cases. In all 93 cases, there were no complications (0/93) (0%) of the procedure. Conclusion EBUS-TBNA is an efficient, cost effective and minimally invasive modality in elderly veteran patient population with multiple co-morbidities. EBUS-TBNA is successful in procuring adequate material for diagnosis, molecular and predictive marker studies; thus, it can play a crucial role in precision oncology. EBUS-TBNA plays a pivotal role diagnosing and ruling out metastatic nodal disease in veteran patient population which has a high incidence of known 2nd extrapulmonary malignancy. EBUS-TBNA is deemed safe in veterans.

Prostate cancer - is a malignant neoplasm arising from prostatic epithelium. [1] It is well known, that prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men population. Most patients, who underwent a biopsy of prostate, have expressed varying degrees of benign prostatic hyperplasia and, accordingly, symptoms, specific to the disease, including symptoms of the lower urinary (LUTS). [2], Uroflowmetry is a method widely used around the world to assess the degree of severity of infravesical obstruction [3]. The aim was to determine the degree of influence of transrectal multifocal biopsy of the prostate under ultrasound control on the degree of infravesical obstruction [4]. The study included patients with elevated serum PSA over 4 ng/ml with the volume (Vpr) of prostate from 20 cm³ to 90 cm³, volume of residual urine no more than 50 cm ³. Uroflowmetry was performed with the determination of the volume of residual urine at the primary treatment. At 21 day after transrectal multifocal prostate biopsy under Ultrasound control all patients underwent uroflowmetry. The age of patients ranged from 40 to 70 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the volume of the prostate gland. The first group consisted of 28 people where prostate volume ranged from 20 cm³ to 40 cm³, in the second group, consisted of 25 persons, prostate volume ranged from 41 cm³ to 60 cm³, and in the third group, consisted of 30 people, prostate volume ranged from 61 cm³ to 90 cm³. The following indicators of urofloumetry were determined as the following: voided volume, max flow rate, average flow, voiding time, flow time, time to max flow, and the volume of residual urine. This study has demonstrated a high risk of complications in patients with prostate volume of more than 60 cm3 caused by infravesical obstruction after prostate biopsy.

In western countries, prostatic carcinoma is the most frequent neoplasia in the male sex after pulmonary neoplasia. Its early diagnosis is very important. The authors report the results of a screening for prostatic carcinoma effected in some municipalities of the district of Parma (Italy); 28 prostatic carcinomas were diagnosed (1.2% of the examined patients). Twelve patients were submitted to radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy according to Walsh. In all of them, PSA values decreased to values < 1 ngr/ml, confirming the radicality of the operation and few complications occurred. The conclusion of the authors is that nowadays timely radical prostatectomy is the only “definitive” treatment of prostatic carcinoma, allowing a better quality of life, however long it is.

Malignant neoplasms of the pelvic organs in the structure of cancer incidence make up about 30 % of the adult population of our country. The widespread use of radiation therapy, unfortunately, has also increased the frequency of radiation damage to the pelvic organs, which, as a rule, take a chronic course. Late radiation damage to the pelvic organs is a fairly common complication of radiation therapy for prostate cancer. According to various authors, the frequency of such iatrogenic pathological changes is up to 25 %. In fact, some patients who are cured of a malignant neoplasm acquire a new disease that significantly reduces the quality of life and requires treatment. During radiation therapy of prostate cancer, various anatomical formations can fall into the zone of radiation fields: the bladder, rectum, intra-pelvic tissue, neurovascular bundles and pelvic bones. It should be noted that isolated lesions of one organ are rare and in most cases they are combined. A special place in clinical practice is occupied by cases of local radiation injuries of the rectum, including severe complications of radiation and combined treatment associated with the formation of fistulas against the background of radiation-induced intra-pelvic fibrosis in the absence of a relapse of the underlying disease. In addition, this situation is associated with a violation of the psycho-emotional status of patients, a sharp decrease in the quality of life, difficulties in social adaptation in society and family, pain syndrome, and problems of medical rehabilitation. Unfortunately, conservative measures for such local radiation injuries are not always effective, and the results of surgical interventions are far from ambiguous and require careful study of patients, search for an algorithm of indications and acceptable standardization of surgical manipulations. This paper presents the basic principles of diagnosis, comprehensive treatment and rehabilitation of patients with late radiation rectitis, depending on the severity of the pathological process. Given the growth of malignant neoplasms of the pelvic organs, we can assume a relative increase in the number of patients with complications associated with radiation therapy, which require rehabilitation measures. Such patients come to the attention of oncologists, radiologists, coloproctologists, gastroenterologists and therapists, etc. Currently, our country lacks a network of specialized regional departments that deal with this problem, as well as treatment standards, clinical recommendations, and an algorithm for diagnostic and rehabilitation measures for local radiation injuries. In connection with the above, it became necessary to summarize the data of clinical studies based on their own experience.

Apesar de existir novas técnicas e múltiplas alternativas terapêuticas para o câncer de próstata localmente avançado, esta enfermidade se constitui em um grande problema de saúde pública mundial, resultando em índices significativos de morbidade e mortalidade, gerando desta forma um desafio para urologistas e oncologistas. Existem múltiplas e bem sucedidas estratégias de tratamento da doença localizada, tais como: a prostatectomia radical, a radioterapia externa conformacional, a braquiterapia e a crioablação. Em contraste, o tratamento da doença metastática e localmente avançada, freqüentemente necessita da alguma forma de bloqueio hormonal. Não existe consenso em vários aspectos da terapia hormonal para tumores localmente avançados tais como: o tipo de bloqueio androgênico a ser usado, terapia hormonal precoce ou tardia, associação com outras modalidades terapêuticas e o uso de bloqueio intermitente. Foi realizada uma revisão crítica deste tipo de tratamento, bem como as indicações atuais de bloqueio hormonal nos tumores de próstata localmente avançado. Não existem estudos prospectivos e randomizados que comparem as diversas formas de tratamento cirúrgico versus radioterápico do câncer de próstata localmente avançado. A hormonioterapia adjuvante à prostatectomia radical, na doença localmente avançada, parece reduzir a progressão tumoral bioquímica, porém, não há estudo que evidencie melhora na sobrevida livre de metástase ou na sobrevida global. O bloqueio androgênico neoadjuvante à prostatectomia radical aumenta a proporção dos pacientes com doença órgão-confinada e margens cirúrgicas negativas, porém sem efeito nas taxas de falha bioquímica do tratamento. A terapia hormonal adjuvante à radioterapia em pacientes portadores de câncer de próstata localmente avançado oferece vantagens na sobrevida global. A terapia hormonal neoadjuvante à radioterapia, em estudos multicêntricos e randomizados, resulta em melhor controle local do tumor bem como prolonga a sobrevida doença-específica. Não há, porém evidência de melhora na sobrevida global. O tratamento por tempo prolongado com bloqueadores hormonais adjuvante à radioterapia mostrou-se superior em relação à sobrevida global e sobrevida livre de doença quando comparado a um período curto de bloqueio, principalmente em pacientes com tumores indiferenciados (Gleason 8-10). Os análogos LHRH, orquiectomia ou o dietilestilbestrol se mostraram como opções de monoterapia, igualmente eficazes, para os pacientes que iniciam terapia hormonal de primeira linha, no tratamento da doença localmente avançada. Não existe evidência que justifique o bloqueio androgênico máximo como terapia hormonal de primeira linha ao invés de monoterapia. Existem vantagens potenciais na qualidade de vida e nos custos do tratamento quando realizada a ablação intermitente, mas a sua eficácia a longo prazo necessita ser confirmada
Despite new techniques and multiple therapeutic alternatives, locally advanced prostate cancer is a serious public health problem, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality rates, that remains a great challenge for urologists and oncologists. Several therapeutic strategies to treat localized prostate cancer have been successful such as conformational external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy and cryoablation. In contrast, treatment of metastatic and locally advanced tumors may often involve androgenic suppression. However, there are no consensus on several aspects of hormonal therapy for locally advanced tumors such as the type of antiandrogenic drug to be used, early versus delayed hormonal therapy, association with other therapeutic modalities and the use of intermittent blockade. We set out to critically review important aspects and current indications of hormonal blockade in the locally advanced prostate tumors. There are no prospective and randomized study that compares current forms of surgical treatment versus radiation therapy of locally advanced prostate cancer. After radical prostatectomy, adjuvant hormonal therapy in the locally advanced disease reduces biochemical failure rates, although no benefit has been shown regarding metastatic free survival or overall suvival. Neoadjuvant androgen blockade enhances the proportion of patients with organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins but no benefit is seen regarding biochemical free recurrence. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to the radiotherapy improves local tumor control as well as it prolongs the diseasespecific survival, although there are no survival advantage. Adjuvant hormonal therapy offers overall survival advantage in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy Long term adjuvant hormonal blockade offers survival benefit for patients with high Gleason score (8-10). LHRH analogues, bilateral orquiectomy and dietilestilbestrol were shown are equally effective as adjuvant therapy for patients with locally disease advanced. There are evidences that maximum androgenic blockade are not more efficient than monotherapy. Potential quality of life and costs advantages of intermittent ablation could be considered an alternative treatment for this group of patient

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o tempo de internação hospitalar e fatores preditores de internação prolongada após PRR realizada em instituição de ensino de alto volume cirúrgico. Objetivos secundários incluíram avaliar taxa de visitas não planejadas ao ambulatório e ao pronto-atendimento, readmissões hospitalares e taxa de complicações perioperatórias utilizando método de classificação padronizado. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada análise retrospectiva de dados prospectivamente coletados em base de dados padronizada para doentes portadores de câncer de próstata localizado submetidos a PRR no ICESP. Os procedimentos foram realizados por residentes do último ano de Urologia sob supervisão de um médico assistente (com experiência superior a 300 PRRs). Internação prolongada foi definida com internação > 2 dias (quartil superior). Um modelo de regressão logística incluindo apenas variáveis pré-operatórias foi inicialmente construído para determinar os fatores que predizem internação prolongada antes do ato cirúrgico; subsequentemente um segundo modelo incluindo tanto variáveis pré como intra e pós-operatórias foi analisado. As variáveis pré-operatórias incluídas no modelo foram: Idade, raça, IMC, PSA, índice de comorbidade de Charlson ajustado e não ajustado por idade, escore de ASA, cirurgias abdominais prévias, estádio clínico, volume prostático, Gleason da biópsia e porcentagem de fragmentos positivos, estratificação de risco NCCN. Os fatores intra e pós-operatórios incluídos na análise foram: tipo de anestesia, tempo operatório, sangramento estimado, transfusão sanguínea, preservação do feixe neurovascular, dissecção linfonodal, peso da próstata, volume tumoral, escore de Gleason do espécime, status da margem cirúrgica, estádio patológico e, finalmente, presença de complicações pós-operatórias (de acordo com o sistema de Clavien). RESULTADOS: Entre janeiro de 2010 e janeiro de 2012, 1011 pacientes foram submetidos a PRR em nossa instituição. A mediana de tempo de internação foi de 2 dias, sendo que 217 (21,5%) pacientes apresentaram internação prolongada. Os fatores preditores de internação prolongada dentre as variáveis pré-operatórias foram ICCa (OR. 1,317, IC95% 1,106-1,568, p=0,002) ou ICC não ajustado e idade separadamente (OR. 1,401, IC95% 1,118-1,756, p=0,003 e OR 1,050, IC95% 1,023-1,078, p < 0,001, respectivamente), escore de ASA 3 (OR. 3,260, IC95% 1,646-6,455, p < 0,001), volume prostático no USG-TR (OR, 1,005, IC95% 1,001-1,011, p=0,038) e raça negra (OR. 2,235, IC95% 1291-3,869, p=0,004); considerando-se também fatores intra e pós-operatórios na regressão, o tempo operatório (OR 1,007, IC95% 1,001-1,013, p=0,022) e presença de complicações de qualquer grau (OR 2,013, IC95% 1,192-3,399, p=0,009) ou complicações maiores (OR 2,357, IC95% 1,228-4,521, p=0,01) também foram correlacionados de maneira independente com internação prolongada. A taxa de readmissão hospitalar nesta série foi de 2,7%; visitas não programadas ao pronto atendimento ocorreram em 7,3% dos casos. A taxa global de complicações (intra e pós-operatórias) foi de 14,5%; a incidência de complicações pós-operatórias menores (graus 1 e 2) e maiores (Grau 3 ou 4) foi de 8,5% e 5,4%, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Os fatores preditores independentes de internação prolongada dentre as variáveis pré-operatórias foram ICCa (ou ICC não ajustado e idade separadamente), escore de ASA 3, volume prostático no USG-TR e raça negra; considerando-se também fatores intra e pós-operatórios, o tempo operatório e presença de complicações de qualquer grau e complicações maiores foram correlacionados de maneira independente com internação prolongada. A identificação destes fatores permite não só auxiliar no planejamento de gastos e aconselhamento de pacientes, mas potencialmente promover modificações de variáveis que possam reduzir o tempo de admissão dos pacientes após PRR
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the length hospital stay and predictors of prolonged hospitalization after RRP performed in a high-surgical volume teaching institution. Secondary objectives were to analyze the rate of unplanned visits to the office and emergency care, hospital readmissions and perioperative complications rates using a standardized classification system. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a standardized database for patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RRP in our institution. The procedures were performed by senior residents under the supervision of a staff surgeon (with prior experience larger than 300 RRPs). Prolonged hospitalization was defined as hospital stay longer than 2 days (upper quartile). A logistic regression model including only preoperative variables was initially built to determine the factors that predict prolonged hospital stay before the surgical procedure; subsequently, a second model including both pre and intraoperative variables was analyzed. Preoperative variables included in the model were age, race, BMI, PSA, Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted and not adjusted for age), ASA score, previous abdominal surgery, clinical stage, prostate volume, biopsy Gleason and percentage of positive cores, NCCN risk stratification. Intra and postoperative factors included in the analysis were: type of anesthesia, operative time, estimated bleeding loss, transfusion, nerve-sparing approach, lymph node dissection, prostate weight, tumor volume, Gleason score specimen, positive margin rates, pathologic stage, and, finally, the presence of postoperative complications (according to Clavien grading system). RESULTS: Between January 2010 and January 2012, 1011 patients underwent RRP at our institution. The median hospital stay was 2 days, and 217 (21.5%) patients had prolonged hospitalization. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay among the preoperative variables were ICCa (OR. 1.317, 95% CI 1.106 to 1.568, p = 0.002) or unadjusted ICC and age separately (OR. 1.401, 95% CI 1.118 to 1.756, p = 0.003 and OR 1.050, 95% CI 1.023 to 1.078, p < 0.001, respectively), ASA score of 3 (OR. 3.260, 95% CI 1.646 to 6.455, p < 0.001), prostate volume on USG-TR (OR, 1.005; 95% CI 1.001 -1.011, p = 0.038) and African-American race (OR 2.235, 95% CI 1291 to 3.869, p = 0.004).; considering also intra and postoperative factors, operative time (OR 1.007, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.013, p = 0.022) and the presence of any complications (OR 2.013, 95% CI 1.192 to 3.399, p = 0.009) or major complications (OR 2.357, 95% CI 1.228 to 4.521, p = 0.01) were also correlated independently with prolonged hospital stay. Hospital readmission rate in this series was 2.7%; unscheduled visits to emergency care occurred in 7.3% of cases. The complication rate was 14.5%; the incidence of minor (grades 1 and 2) and major complications (Grade 3 or 4) was 8.5% and 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The independent predictors of prolonged hospitalization among the preoperative variables were ICCa (or unadjusted ICC and age separately), ASA score of 3, prostate volume on USG-TR and African-American race; considering also intra and postoperative factors, operative time, presence of any complications and major complications were correlated independently with prolonged hospital stay. The identification of these factors allows not only better planning the institutional costs related to RRP but also proper counseling of patients undergoing RRP; potentially modifiable risk factors can be optimized to shorter length of hospital stay after RRP

Introdução: A curva de aprendizado em cirurgia é um período de sedimentação de habilidades onde procedimentos são realizados com maior dificuldade e lentidão, maior risco de complicações intra-operatórias e menor eficácia clínico-funcional devido à inexperiência do cirurgião. Nós analisamos a curva de aprendizado inicial da prostatectomia radical retropúbica realizada por médicos residentes do Setor de Uro-Oncologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Método: estudo prospectivo, envolvendo 184 prostatectomias radicais retropúbicas, realizadas por cinco residentes consecutivamente, entre 02/06/2006 e 31/01/2008. Foram considerados: o tempo operatório, sangramento transoperatório, necessidade de transfusão sanguínea, taxa de margens cirúrgicas comprometidas, complicações intra-operatórias e avaliação funcional precoce. Resultados: cada residente realizou em média 37 cirurgias. O PSA mediano foi de 9,3 ng/mL e o estágio clínico T1c em 71% dos pacientes. O estágio patológico foi pT2 (73%), pT3 (23%), pT4 (4%); o escore de Gleason na peça cirúrgica foi de 54% (Gleason <7), 33% (Gleason 7) e 13% (Gleason >7). O tempo cirúrgico mediano foi de 140 minutos, o sangramento mediano de 488 mL e a necessidade de transfusão sanguínea de 7,2%. A taxa de margens cirúrgicas positivas de 23% foi constante nos 30 primeiros casos. A avaliação funcional precoce (até 6 meses de pós-operatório) mostrou 89% de continência, 57% de disfunção erétil e 7% de recidiva bioquímica. Conclusão: Durante a curva de aprendizado da prostatectomia radical, ocorre redução significativa do tempo operatório após 20 cirurgias e tendência de redução do sangramento e da necessidade de transfusão sanguínea após 29 cirurgias. As margens cirúrgicas permanecem estáveis em 23%.
Introduction: The learning curve is a period of skills improvement. Procedures are carried through with longer operating time, high risk of surgical complications and sub optimal functional outcomes. We have analyzed the residents\' initial learning curve in open radical prostatectomy in our institution. Method: Between June of 2006 and January of 2008, 184 open radical prostatectomies have been performed in our service by five senior residents in Urology. We prospectively evaluated: operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, positive surgical margins, intra-operative complications and early functional outcomes. Results: an average of 37 open radical prostatectomies was performed by each resident. Medium PSA was 9,3ng/mL; clinical stage T1c in 71% of the patients. The pathological stage was pT2 (73%), pT3 (23%), pT4 (4%) and Gleason score was 54% (Gleason <7), 33% (Gleason 7) and 13% (Gleason >7). The medium operating time was 140 minutes, medium blood loss of 488 mL and positive margins were found in 23% during the first 30 cases. Early functional outcomes (less than 6 months after surgery) revealed 89% of urinary continence, 43% of normal erectile function and 7% of biochemical recurrence. Conclusion: During the initial learning curve significant reduction in operating time occurs after first 20 procedures, blood loss and transfusion improves after 29 prostatectomies and positive margins remain stable during the first 30 patients (23%).