Academic literature on the topic 'PT 35.5 UL 2014'

Abstract Introduction: FA is an autossomal recessive syndrome that usually presents with congenital abnormalities, progressive pancytopenia and an increased risk of cancer.The first stem cell transplant for FA was performed in Latin America in 1983 and since then the BMT center from Curitiba, Brazil became a reference center for this disease. From 1983 until June 2004, 140 pts received a stem cell transplant for FA and most of them were in aplastic phase. In this study we performed a retrospective analysis of 36 patients who received an unrelated stem cell transplant for FA in our BMT center. Patients and methods: Period: 04/1996 to 06/2004, age 4 to 19 year old (median: 9y), sex: 20F/16M. Disease duration: 7 to 122 months (Median: 45), Previous transfusions: 0 to 400 (Median of 21). Aplastic phase: 35 pts. Myelodysplastic syndrome:1pt.Stem cell source : bone marrow 15 pts ( 6/6 : 12pts; 5/6 : 3pts) , cord blood : 20 pts ( 6/6: 3pts , 5/6 :8 pts and 4/6 : 9 pts) and peripheral stem cell : 1 pt ( 6/6). Preparatory regimen: 9 pts received only Cyclophosphamide (CY), 15 pts received CY + Fludarabine + Thimoglobuline, 4 pts received Fludarabine + TBI (200cGy), 4 pts received CY+ TBI ± ATG and 4 pts Fludarabine + CY. GVHD prophylaxis: Cyclosporine (Csa) + MTX: 18 pts, Csa + steroids: 14 pts and other: 4pts. All pts received prophylactic antibiotics according to common practice. Results: 13 pts are alive and well 45 to 1579 days after transplant (median 303 days). 34 pts were evaluable for engraftment (2 pts died before day 28 due to bacterial sepsis and CNS hemorrhage). Median time to reach PMN> 500/uL was 21 days after transplant (+ 12 to + 57) and platelets> 20.000/uL was 22, 5 days (+14 to + 49). Pts who received CY + Fludarabine + Thimoglobuline had a better survival (56%) but it did not reach statistical significance when compared to other preparatory regimens. Acute graft versus host disease (A-GVHD) occurred in 9 pts (grade III: 4 pts, grade IV: 5 pts). Three pts with grade III A-GVHD developed C-GVHD (2 were extensive and severe). VOD was diagnosed in 3 pts (moderate/severe). Mucosytis grade III- IV occurred in 16 pts. Twenty-three pts died at a median time of 58 days after transplant (7 to 226 d). All pts with primary graft failure (11) and 5 pts with only a neuthrophil engraftment died. Causes of death: 15 pts: infections or hemorrhage related to rejection; 4 pts: GVHD, 3 pts:VOD , 1 pt: P carinii and 1 pt EBV lymphoproliferative disease. Transplant related mortality (TRM) was 55% for the whole group (38% for the pts who received CY+ Fludarabine + ATG). It was also lower (35%) for the pts who received cord blood transplants but it did not reach statistical significance regarding survival rate. Conclusions: Treatment of FA pts with unrelated stem cell transplant must be directed at a more effective control of rejection and GVHD. Transplant related mortality is still very high in this group of pts. Our study shows that the use of CY + Fludarabine + Thimoglobuline may improve survival but we still need more pts and a longer follow up to confirm this data.

Abstract The prognosis of elderly patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains poor, and novel therapeutic approaches are clearly needed. CD19 is expressed on the majority of precursor-B ALLs and represents an attractive therapeutic target. The anti-CD19 bi-specific engager antibody blinatumomab has demonstrated significant activity in both relapsed/refractory ALL and minimal residual disease (MRD) positive ALL. Therefore, we evaluated blinatumomab as a single agent in the upfront treatment of newly diagnosed elderly pts with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) negative B-lineage ALL to determine response rates and overall survival (OS). Methods: Pts were treated at National Clinical Trial Network sites from June 2015 to September 2017. The primary objective of the study was to estimate 3-year OS. An IND was approved by the FDA and the protocol was approved by a central institutional review board. Eligibility: age > 65 years, newly diagnosed Ph negative B-lineage ALL with adequate organ function and no evidence of central nervous system (CNS) disease. Pts received blinatumomab for induction at standard dosing for 1-2 cycles until attainment of complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (defined below). Pts then received 3 cycles of blinatumomab post-remission therapy followed by 18 months of maintenance POMP (prednisone, vincristine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate). A total of 8 doses of intrathecal methotrexate were administered as CNS prophylaxis. Cytogenetic risk was ascribed by NCCN 2018 criteria and bone marrow samples were analyzed for the presence of the Ph-like signature. MRD was assessed centrally by 8 color flow cytometry pre-treatment, on Day 35 of induction cycle 1, and on Day 35 of re-induction (if applicable). Response was assessed at the completion of 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab. CR was defined as < 5% marrow blasts with no evidence of extramedullary disease and recovery of counts [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/uL, platelets >100,000/uL]. CRi was defined the same as CR but ANC < 1000/ uL and/ or platelets ≤ 100,000/ uL. OS was measured from day of registration on trial until the date of death. Disease-free survival (DFS) was measured from the date the pt achieved CR/ CRi until relapse or death. Toxicities were graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0. Results: Of 31 pts enrolled, 29 were eligible. The median age was 75 years (range 66 - 84), 22 (76%) were male, median baseline white blood count was 3.7 x 103/uL (range 0.3 - 7,100), and median bone marrow blast count percentage was 86.5% (range 30-100). Three pts received hydroxyurea or steroids prior to treatment initiation. Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis was: poor (34% of pts; n=10), standard (55% of pts; n=16), good (3% of pts; n=1) and unknown (7% of pts, n=2). Testing for the Ph-like signature is being completed. The most common Grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities related to treatment during induction were hyperglycemia (14%), dyspnea (10%), febrile neutropenia (10%), hypertension (10%), and lung infection (7%). One pt developed Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and 1 developed Grade 3 neurotoxicity. No pts died during the first 28 days of treatment. The overall response rate (CR + CRi) was 66% (all CRs). Thirteen of the 19 responders have available MRD data post-treatment. Of these, 12 pts (92%) achieved MRD negativity, all at Cycle 1 Day 35. One pt required 2 cycles of blinatumomab to achieve CR. One pt proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median follow-up time is 1 year and median duration on trial is 170 days (6 pts are still on maintenance therapy). OS estimated by Kaplan Meier at 6 months is 79% (95% CI 58%-90%) and at 1 year is 65% (95% CI 43%-80%). DFS estimated at 6 months is 68% (95% CI 43%-84%) and at 1 year is 56% (95% CI 31%-75%). No baseline features including CD19 expression (by percentage or mean-fluorescent intensity) or presence of a CD19 negative subpopulation were associated with response. Conclusions: Blinatumomab was well tolerated and effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed elderly patients with Ph negative B-lineage ALL. Further follow up will determine the durability of these responses. Disclosures Advani: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy. Wieduwilt:Leadiant: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. Park:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Consultancy. Stock:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Erba:Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Astellas: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Astellas: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Juno: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that is FDA approved for treatment of 5q- myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloma. It has also been tested as a salvage therapy of refractory/relapsed AML with encouraging activity, especially in patients (pts) who relapsed post allogeneic transplant (alloSCT). In this setting, it has been postulated that lenalidomide may re-activate donor immune system and enhance a graft-versus-leukemia effect. This hypothesis is also supported by evidence of increase graft-versus-disease (GVHD) observed in pts treated with lenalidomide post-alloSCT. Therefore, in order to prospectively study the safety, feasibility, and early impact on risk of disease relapse we performed a phase 1 dose escalation study of lenalidomide administered orally daily following reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) alloSCT in pts with leukemia and lymphoma eligible for transplant. Methods: Pts were enrolled on a two-step process, with initial enrollment prior to transplant followed by a re-registration evaluation post-transplant at day +60 (+/- 7 days) to ensure eligibility. At this screening, pts were required to demonstrate engraftment with ANC >1000/uL, platelet count ³50,000/uL, and T-cell chimerism ³40% by day +30. Pts were required to have a creatinine clearance ³50 mL/min, AST ²3 x ULN, and ECOG PS of 0-2. Grades 1 or 2 acute GVHD (aGVHD) were allowed if controlled on ² 20 mg of prednisone daily; pts with a history of grades 3 or 4 aGVHD were excluded. Lenalidomide was given orally daily for 28 days/cycle. Dosing escalation was performed using a standard 3 x 3 design, with dose level (DL) 1 = 5 mg , DL 2 = 10 mg, and DL 3 = 15 mg. Results: From 6/2011 to 10/2012, 17 pts with AML (n=13), CLL (n=1), and DLBCL (n=3) were enrolled (Table 1) and underwent RIC alloSCT. The majority of patients had a Disease Risk Index (Armand et al. Blood, 2014) of high or very high. Of enrolled pts, only 3 received lenalidomide. Of the pts who did not proceed to treatment at re-registration, 4 were ineligible due to relapse, 3 were ineligible due to elevated creatinine, 3 were ineligible due to GVHD, 2 declined, and 2 were not treated due to study closure. All pts who received lenalidomide were treated at DL 1. The first pt treated (00-06) received cycle 1 without toxicity. On cycle 2 day 9 he developed a skin rash consistent with acute GVHD and discontinued therapy. The second pt treated (00-11) developed skin rash and diarrhea on cycle 1 day 3 and was diagnosed with steroid refractory aGVHD of the GI tract. He expired from complications of treatment. The third pt treated (00-12) developed a skin rash and diarrhea on cycle 1 day 6. Lenalidomide was discontinued. Based on these outcomes, the study was closed due to concerns regarding the risk of severe aGVHD caused by lenalidomide. However, patients 00-06 and 00-12 remain alive and in CR days 958 and 751 post transplant, respectively. In the entire cohort, the median PFS was 103 days (range = 15-992) with median OS 103 days (range = 30-1085). Conclusion: Early administration of low-dose lenalidomide following alloSCT is not feasible due to potential increased risk of severe aGVHD and likelihood of elevated creatinine at this time point. However, 2 of 3 pts who received lenalidomide and responded to treatment for aGVHD remain in CR from their high-risk AML. Thus, an amended approach with lower/fewer dose of lenalidomide/cycle or alternatively, use in transplants that do not utilize calcineurin phosphatase inhibitors (such as T-cell depletion based approaches) warrants additional consideration. Abstract 3954. Table 1 PT Age Sex Diagnosis Disease Risk Index Comorbidity Index Lena Treatment Progression free survival (days) Overall survival (days) Cause of death 01 64 F AML High 3 Ineligible1 592 979 Relapse 02 64 M AML Very high 1 Ineligible1 140 229 Relapse 03 26 F AML High 6 Ineligible2 35 121 Relapse 04 39 M DLBCL Intermediate 0 Declined 789 1085 05 64 M DLBCL Intermediate 1 Declined 108 121 Relapse 06 36 M AML High 3 Yes 958 958 07 60 M AML High 3 Ineligible3 992 992 08 61 M CLL Low 0 Ineligible3 101 101 Acute GVHD 09 71 M AML High 1 Ineligible1 957 957 10 57 M AML High 5 Ineligible2 30 30 Regimen Related Toxicity 11 32 M AML Very High 2 Yes 103 103 Acute GVHD 12 50 F AML Very High 4 Yes 751 751 13 61 F AML Very High 4 Ineligible2 42 242 Relapse 14 60 M AML Very High 0 Ineligible2 15 160 Relapse 15 63 F AML High 3 Ineligible3 61 61 Acute GVHD 16 66 M AML High 3 Study closure 706 706 17 68 M DLBCL High 5 Study closure 72 72 Pneumonia 1 = elevated creatinine 2 = relapse 3 = GVHD Disclosures Off Label Use: Lenalidomide administration following allogeneic transplantation.. Blum:Celgene: Consultancy.

Background: We have previously reported initial high response rates of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (Tiacci and Park et al. NEJM 2015). However, complete response (CR) rates were low at 35-40% with detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) in most patients, and a longer follow up revealed a relapse rate of 50% (Park JH et al. Blood 2018, 132;392). Based on the recent data suggesting improved CR rate in combination with rituximab in relapsed HCL (Tiacci et al. Blood 2016, 128:1214), we initiated a phase II clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of vemurafenib and obinutuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed HCL (NCT03410875). Methods: Adult pts with previously untreated HCL who met the treatment initiation criteria (i.e. ANC <1.0k/ul, Hgb <10.0g/dL or PLT <100k/ul) are eligible for the study. Patients received vemurafenib 960mg bid from months 1-4 and obinutuzumab from months 2-4, for a total treatment duration of 4 months. Obinutuzumab was administered at 1000mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of month 2, and day 1 of month 3 and 4. Vemurafenib dose reductions were allowed for drug-related adverse events (AEs). Response was assessed at the end of month 4 with bone marrow (BM) biopsy and CT scans. The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of vemurafenib and obinutuzumab combination as assessed by CR rates, and the secondary objectives include assessment of safety, duration of response, MRD negativity, and BRAF allele burden by digital PCR. The study adopted a Simon's minimax 2-stage design and required ≥7 CR in the first 9 pts in the first stage to continue accrual for a total of 28 pts. We report the result of the first 9 pts in the first stage of the study. Results: A total of 11 pts have been enrolled to the study to date. The median age of the patients is 49 years old (range, 35-79). The median pretreatment ANC, Hgb and PLT is 0.7k/ul (range, 0.0-2.6), 11.5g/dL (range, 7.0-15.0), and 83k/ul (range, 21-153), respectively. Nine of 11 pts had a baseline splenomegaly. Nine pts completed all treatments to date, and 2 pts remain on active therapy. Among the 9 pts who completed the treatment, all pts achieved a response with normalization of cytopenia, including 7 pts with MRD negative CR and 2 pts with PR at the end of month four. Two pts with PR at month 4 converted to MRD+ and MRD negative CR by month 7 and 10, respectively, with no further treatment, with the best overall CR rate of 100% (9/9 pts) (Figure). All MRD negative CR had undetectable BRAFV600E by highly sensitive digital PCR. After 1 month of vemurafenib and before the first dose of obinutuzumab, 7 of 9 pts had ANC recovery to >1.0K/ul and 8 of 9 pts had Hgb >10 g/dL and PLT 100k/uL. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months (range, 4.6-15.4), all pts remain in remission with no relapse. The most common vemurafenib-related AEs were rash (73%; Gr2-9%, Gr3-64%), arthralgia (64%; Gr1-27%, Gr2-27%, Gr3-18%), alopecia (45%, all Gr1), dry skin (27%, all Gr1), and fatigue (27%, Gr1). Two pts experienced obinutuzumab infusion reaction but were able to complete all intended doses of obinutuzumab. No case of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas has been observed. No pt discontinued the therapy due to toxicity but 8 pts had vemurafenib dose reductions due to rash (n=5) and arthralgia (n=2). Conclusion: Vemurafenib and obinutuzumab combination therapy induced a high CR rate of 100% and high rates of MRD negativity (89%) in patients with HCL in the frontline setting and appears to be a promising chemo-free targeted therapeutic approach for HCL. A majority of the pts achieved a normalization of cytopenia within 4 weeks of starting therapy. A longer follow-up is needed to assess durability of remission and degree of immunosuppression compared to cladribine-treated cohorts. Figure Disclosures Park: Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Winer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer: Consultancy. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Vemurafenib and obinutuzumab for treatment of hairy cell leukemia

Abstract The prognosis of patients (pts) with relapsed/ refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains poor and novel therapies are needed. The anti-CD22 immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) has demonstrated promising results in both phase 2 and 3 trials (Kantarjian et al. Lancet Oncology 2012; 13(4): 403-11). Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated superior anti-tumor activity when INO is co-administered with cyclophosphamide (C), vincristine (V), and prednisone (P). In this study, SWOG 1312, we assess the safety of INO in combination with CVP and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of INO in this regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD22+ acute leukemia (B-ALL, mixed phenotype, and Burkitts). Here, we present our toxicity results. Methods: Pts were treated at limited SWOG institutions from Apr 2014 to present. INO was supplied by Pfizer and an IND was approved by the FDA. The protocol was reviewed and approved by each institutional review board. Eligibility criteria included: age > 18 years (yrs), > 20% blasts expressing CD22, R/R CD22+ acute leukemia (B-ALL, mixed phenotype, or Burkitts), and adequate organ function. All pts received treatment with C (750 mg/m2) intravenous (IV) Day 1, V (1.4 mg/m2) (max 2 mg) IV Day 1, P (100 mg) orally Days 1-5 and IO (dose escalated as in Table 1) IV Days 1, 8, and 15. Each cycle was 28 days, and a maximum of 6 cycles could be administered. Dose escalation was performed using a standard 3x3 design; with the plan to treat 12 pts once the MTD was defined. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were considered: (1) > Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities with the exception of nausea, vomiting and toxicities secondary to neutropenia and sepsis; (2) prolonged myelosuppression [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/ uL or platelet count < 25,000/uL] in a bone marrow with < 5% blasts and no evidence of leukemia that lasts > 35 days beyond the most recent dose of IO; (3) any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia, and toxicities secondary to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sepsis) that does not resolve to Grade 2 or better by 7 days beyond the most recent dose of IO; (4) any > Grade 3 elevation in SGOT/ SGPT or bilirubin lasting ≥ 7 days; (5) any IO-related toxicity resulting in permanent discontinuation of IO. Results: As of 7/14/2016, 24 pts have been enrolled: 2 pts were ineligible and 3 pts are currently receiving treatment and are not evaluable for toxicity. Of the 19 evaluable pts, the median age was 49 yrs (range 21-75), 10 (53%) were male, and the median WBC at registration was 9.4 K/uL (range 0.9-59.6). All pts had B-ALL. The median time from initial diagnosis to registration was 774 days. Five pts were in 1st relapse, 8 in 2nd relapse, 3 in 3rd relapse, 1 in 4th relapse, and 2 pts were primary refractory. Five pts had received prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT); 7 pts had poor risk cytogenetics (Ph+, -7, +8, complex, or hypodiploid). One death occurred during treatment and was attributed to pneumonia. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity related to treatment was common: neutropenia (11 pts), thrombocytopenia (7 pts), and anemia (6 pts). Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities were almost exclusively febrile neutropenia. One DLT occurred at Dose Level 3: prolonged myelosuppression. No cases of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred during treatment, and 1 pt experienced Grade 3 alkaline phosphatase at Dose Level 1. Three pts proceeded to AHSCT after study treatment; 1 pt developed VOD post AHSCT however, this fully resolved. Currently, 3 pts have been enrolled to Dose Level 4. Conclusion: The combination of CVP/IO is well tolerated and only 1 significant hepatic event (which subsequently resolved) was observed despite a heavily pre-treated group of patients. Further toxicity results and dose escalation will be presented at the meeting. Response data will also be presented if enrollment is complete. Disclosures Advani: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Othus:Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Erba:Pfizer: Consultancy; Juno: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Agios: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celator: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Pfizer: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Celator: Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Astellas: Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy.

The prognosis of patients (pts) with relapsed/ refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains poor and novel therapies are needed. The anti-CD22 immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) has demonstrated promising results in phase 2 and 3 trials. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated superior anti-tumor activity when IO is co-administered with cyclophosphamide (C), vincristine (V), and prednisone (P). We assessed the safety of IO in combination with CVP and determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IO in this regimen for pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD22+ acute leukemia. An expansion cohort was treated at the MTD and efficacy results are presented. Methods: Pts were treated at SWOG institutions from 2014-19. IO was supplied by Pfizer. Eligibility: age &gt; 18 yrs, &gt; 20% blasts expressing CD22, R/R CD22+ acute leukemia (B-ALL, mixed phenotype, or Burkitts), and adequate organ function. All pts received C (750 mg/m2) intravenous (IV) Day (D) 1, V (1.4 mg/m2) (max 2 mg) IV D1, P (100 mg) orally D 1-5 and IO (dose escalated as in Table 1) up to a maximum of 6 cycles. Each cycle was 28 d. Dose escalation utilized a standard 3+3 design with the plan to treat 12 additional pts at the MTD. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were considered: (1) &gt; Grade (Gr) 4 non-hematologic toxicities (NHTs) with the exception of nausea, vomiting and toxicities secondary to neutropenia and sepsis; (2) prolonged myelosuppression [absolute neutrophil count &lt; 500/ uL or platelet count &lt; 25,000/uL] in a bone marrow with &lt; 5% blasts and no evidence of leukemia that lasts &gt; 35 d beyond the last dose of IO; (3) any Gr 3 NHT (excluding peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia, and toxicities secondary to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sepsis) that does not resolve to &lt; Gr 2 by 7 d beyond the last dose of IO; (4) any &gt; Gr 3 elevation in SGOT/ SGPT or bilirubin lasting &gt; 7 d; (5) any IO-related toxicity resulting in permanent discontinuation of IO. Results: 50 pts were enrolled; 2 were ineligible. The median age was 43 yrs (range 20-79), 56% were male, and the median WBC at registration was 2.7 K/uL (range 0.3-59.6). All pts had B-ALL. The median time from initial diagnosis to registration was 515 d. Twenty-one pts were in 1st relapse, 12 in 2nd relapse, 4 in 3rd relapse, 1 in 4th relapse, and 10 pts were refractory to their last treatment. Eighteen pts (38%) had received prior blinatumomab; 9 had prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT); 30% had poor risk cytogenetics (Ph+, -7, +8, complex, MLL abnormalities, or hypodiploid); 13 pts were tested for the Ph-like signature with 5 pts identified as Ph-like. One death occurred during treatment and was attributed to pneumonia in the setting of active ALL. Gr 3-4 hematologic toxicity related to treatment was common: neutropenia (73%), thrombocytopenia (63%), and anemia (50%). Gr 3-4 NHTs were mainly febrile neutropenia. One DLT occurred at DL 3: prolonged myelosuppression and 1 DLT at DL 5: Gr 3 ascites. Gr 3-4 transaminases or bilirubin occurred in 1 pt (2%) during treatment and in 10 pts (23%) during follow-up. No cases of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred during treatment but 3 (7%) occurred during follow up (post-transplant). The MTD was DL 5. Thirteen pts (30%) proceeded to AHSCT after study treatment. The complete remission (CR)/ CR with incomplete count recovery rate was 61% (95% CI 39%-80%) in the 23 evaluable pts treated at the MTD, and 60% (3/ 5) in pts with the Ph-like signature. There was no statistically significant difference in response rates or hepatic toxicities between the various DLs. However, all 3 VOD cases occurred either after 2nd transplant (n=2) and/ or at DL 5 (n=2). The rates of CR/CRi were 60% and 50% respectively in DLs 1 and 2. The median overall survival was 7.7 months for all pts, and 10.9 months for pts treated at the MTD. Notably, 1 pt remains in a remission 3.5 yrs out from registration without having a transplant. Conclusion: CVP/IO is relatively well tolerated with high response rates and low toxicity despite a heavily pre-treated group of pts. Minimal residual disease data and additional Ph-like signature data are being compiled. Randomized studies will be needed to determine differences in toxicities and response rates with the various doses. However, there is a suggestion that VOD may increase with higher doses of IO and in the setting of 2 transplants. This regimen may represent a promising strategy in the treatment of elderly pts in the newly diagnosed setting. Disclosures Advani: Abbvie: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Liedtke:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Research Funding. Aldoss:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; AUTO1: Consultancy; Helocyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses. Othus:Celgene: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; Glycomimetics: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. Erba:Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, ImmunoGen, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Millennium, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Sunesis: Consultancy; Celgene, Incyte, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, ImmunoGen, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Juno, Millennium, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Introduction Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL), a distinct subtype of acute myeloid leukemia is a relatively rare disease, characterized by a severe coagulopathy which is often present at the time of diagnosis. Mortality due to bleeding complications during induction is more common in this subtype than in other FAB classifications. The number of newly diagnosed cases in the US is estimated to be 600 to 800 cases a year. The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) into the therapy of APL has completely revolutionized the management and outcome of this disease. The treatment and cure of patients with APL depend not only on the effective use of combination therapy but also involves critical supportive care measures. Aim The aim of this study was to analyze the number of red cells, platelets, plasma and cryoprecipitate transfused during the induction phase of treatment until time to response. Method Patient and transfusion data was retrospectively collected from the Leukemia Department files and Blood bank records at the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2010 to 2011. Results There were 28 newly diagnosed APL patients ([16F: 12 M]; 2 AA/6 Hispanic/20 White), median age 49 (21-84) and included patients who did not go on to clinical trials due to early complications. Karyotyping was obtained on 26 (93%) patients. Confirmation of the PML-RARα short or long transcripts was obtained in 25 (89%) patients by quantitative RT-PCR all of whom showed the PML-RARα fusion transcript. Induction therapy was started on day -1 to day 0 from the date of diagnosis in 5 (18%) patients, Day 1 in 13 (46%), Day 2 in 1 (3%), Day 3 in 3 (11%), Day 4 in 2 (7%), Day 6 in 3 (11%) and Day 7 in 1 (3%) patient. 24 (86%) patientsreceived Arsenic + ATRA, 3 (11%) received Arsenic + ATRA + Idarubicinand 1 (3%)received Arsenic + ATRA + Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin. 4 (14%) patients died early from complications of severe coagulopathy. Response to therapy was noted in 24 (86%) patients, median 25 (range 19-63) days from start of treatment. Red cells were transfused to 25 (89%) patients, median 6 (range 1-29) units, platelets to 23 (82%) patients, median 5 (1-47) units, plasma to 11 (39%) patients, median 8 (2-38) units and cryoprecipitate to 14 (50%) patients, median 10 (2-20) units. There was 1 (3%) patient who did not require blood or blood products, 3 (11%) did not require red cell transfusions, 5 (18%) platelet transfusions, 17 (61%) plasma transfusions and 14 (50%) did not require cryoprecipitate. Of the 24 patients who responded to therapy, 22 (79%) patients are alive. One patient has been lost to follow up. The remaining 21 (75%) patients are in molecular remission with a median follow-up of 714 (256-1110) days from the date of response. Two (7%) patients died in molecular remission from unrelated non-hematologic causes (204, 283 days from their date of response). Table 1 The results of the laboratory studies at the time of diagnosis/ time of response are as follows; WBC median 1.2 K (0.5-17.9)/median 3.3 K/UL (1.0-5.5), Hgb median 8.39 G/Dl (5.9-12.1/median 10.3 G/Dl (8.1-12.1), platelet count median 31 K/UL (3-87)/median 180 K/UL (49-1335), BM blast median 1% (0-64), median 1% (0-4), BM progranulocytes median 59% (0-93)/median 1% (0-7), BM normoblast median 9% (1-35)/median 28% (0-72%), PT median 16.2 secs (14.7-21.0)/ median 14.3 sec (13.1-15.5), INR median 1.29 (1.12-1.76)/median 1.10 (0.97-1.20), aPTT median 29.9 secs (26.0-41.0)/ median 32.2 secs (24.1-47.4), D -Dimer median 19.83 mcg/ml (3.71->20.00)/median 0.96 mcg/ml (0.39-6.09), Fibrinogen median 172 MG/DL (77-461)/ median 399 MG/DL (164-856) and LDH median 883 IU/L (374-2561)/median 591 IU/L (444-1084). Conclusion In conclusion, our review found that the majority of cases required red cells and platelet transfusion but only 50% of the patients required plasma or cryoprecipitate transfusion support for their coagulopathy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Revlimid® (R) or lenalidomide is the leading clinical compound in a new group of drugs called IMiD®s, which have immunomodulatory properties. In contrast with thalidomide (T) R has significantly less neurological toxicity. Several phase I and II trials with R showed promising results in relapsed/refractory MM. Our group demonstrated that Bi augments tumor mass reduction and improves responses in patients (pts) receiving low-dose T and/or D. We report the initial results of a phase II trial exploring the combination of Bi plus R plus D (BiRD) in newly diagnosed MM. Methods: The trial is designed to accrue 35 pts. Thus far 28 pts have been accrued between Nov. 2004 and Aug. 2005 of which 22 pts (13 male and 9 female) are eligible for evaluation. R is given orally (po) at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. D is given po at a dose of 40 mg once weekly. Bi is given po at 500 mg twice daily. All pts also receive low dose aspirin (ASA)(81mg) once daily as thrombosis prophylaxis, prophylactic sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and a proton pump inhibitor. Responses are defined according to the EBMTR. In addition, the category of near-CR (nCR) is defined as a CR with a positive immunofixation. A minimum of 2 cycles is required for response assessment; all pts are assessed on an intent-to-treat basis. Results: Pt characteristics are as follows: median age of 62 years (range 36–77), hemoglobin of 11.4g/dL (range 7.2–15.1), platelets of 247k/uL (range 51–526), β2m of 4.0mg/L (range 0.8–5.1), CRP of 1.0mg/dL (range 0.3–8.4), creatinine of 1.3mg/dL (range 0.5–3.1), albumin of 3.6g/dL (range 2.3–4.9), and calcium of 8.9mg/dL (range 6.9–11.2). Conventional cytogenetics was normal in all pts; FISH abnormalities are as follows: trisomy 11 (2 pts), tetrasomy 11 (1 pt), del13q14(5 pts), t(4,14)(1pt), t(11,14)(2 pts). 52% of the pts are stage IIIa, 13% are stage IIIb, 35% are stage IIa. Responses are summarized in the table below. Of the 22 evaluable pts, 21(95%) have achieved an objective response (&gt;PR) within 1–2 months of Rx with the remaining pt continues to respond. Nearly one third of pts have achieved either a CR(6/22) or a nCR(1/22-continuing on Rx). The remaining 14 pts(63%) achieved a PR. Of those pts who achieved a PR, 6/14 pts(43%) had &gt;90% reduction in the initial paraprotein, while 12/14 pts(86%) had &gt;75% decrement. 5 pts are now off study (3 pts in CR going to PBSCT and 2 due to toxicities). So far 15 pts have experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. These include, anemia(4.5%), neutropenia(4.5%), thrombocytopenia(4.5%), increased liver enzymes(4.5%), anxiety(4.5%), insomnia(9%), tremors(4.5%), hyperglycemia(4.5%), syncope(4.5%), Stevens Johnson’s(4.5%) and colonic perforation(4.5%). DVT occurred in 3(13.6%) patients, all off ASA, of which 2 (9%) had an associated PE, one of whom died. No grade 4 toxicities have been otherwise observed. Three pts have undergone successful stem cell harvest of which one has undergone transplantation with melphalan 200. Engraftment was successful by day 12. Conclusions: BiRD is highly effective and safe in the initial Rx of MM. Stem cell harvest is not impaired after BiRD induction. Supported in part by the LLS SCOR grant and K23CA109260-01 Response Evaluation # of Pts % Total 22 100 Overall Response 21 95 CR 6 27.3 n-CR 1 4.5 PR 14 63.6 SD 1 4.5

Abstract Abstract 607 Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) and azacitidine (AZA) have activity in lower- and higher-risk MDS patients (pts), where both microenvironment and cell regulatory mechanisms play a role. The LEN/AZA combination was well-tolerated in the Phase 1 study (Sekeres JCO 2010) that established Phase 2 dosing, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 67%. Methods: The primary objectives for this multicenter, Phase 2 trial were to determine the efficacy and safety of combination therapy, with AZA 75mg/m2 daily × 5 days, and LEN 10mg daily × 21 days of a 28-day cycle (maximum of 7 cycles), in pts with higher-risk MDS (IPSS score ≥1.5, or World Health Organization (WHO) classification with ≥5% myeloblasts) not previously treated with AZA or LEN. Adverse Events (AEs) were assessed per NCI CTC v.3.0, with median decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) or platelets (plt) calculated for the first 8 weeks of therapy. Subjects were enrolled to the Phase 1 study from 5/05 through 5/08, and to the Phase 2 continuation from 3/09 through 4/11, with results reported through 7/11. Bone marrow biopsies were performed after the 4th and 7th cycles, and pts could continue on AZA monotherapy off-study. Responses were assessed per modified International Working Group criteria as complete or partial response (CR, PR), or hematologic improvement (HI), and validated centrally. Time to progression was from date of CR, and overall survival (OS) from date of study enrollment. Results: A total of 36 pts were enrolled at 3 centers (18 Phase 1, 18 Phase 2); median age was 68 years (range 47–78), 13 pts (36%) were female, median interval from diagnosis was 8 weeks (range, 2–106), and median follow-up was 15 months (range 2–60). Prior MDS therapies included growth factors (19%), immunosuppressants (14%), and chemotherapy (17%). Median baseline hemoglobin was 9.7 g/dL, platelet count 65 k/uL, neutrophil count 840 k/uL, erythropoietin level 108 MIU/mL, and bone marrow blast percentage was 11%. IPSS categories were Int-1 (5 pts), Int-2 (20 pts), and High (11 pts); 8 pts had RAEB-1, 21 had RAEB-2, and 3 had CMML. Only 1 pt had a chromosome 5q deletion. Pts received a median of 5 cycles of therapy on-study. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AEs (related or unrelated) included cardiac (11%), febrile neutropenia (31%), other infection (8%), pulmonary (11%), vascular access-related thrombosis (6%), CNS hemorrhage (6%), or other (11%). Three pts (8%) died while on-study. The most common grade ≤2, non-hematologic AEs related to treatment included constipation (47%), dermatologic (rash or injection site reaction) (44%), fatigue (39%), diarrhea (39%), nausea (19%), dizziness (19%), and dyspnea (19%). Median decrease from baseline in ANC was 35% and in plts was 18%. Of 35 patients evaluable, the ORR was 71%: 14 pts (40%) had a CR and 11 (31%) had HI, of whom 3 had bi- or tri-lineage HI. Median time to response was 3 months (range, 1–7). Three patients had progressive disease while on-study. Among pts achieving a CR, 7 (50%) continue to receive therapy; median age was 68 years (range, 50–76); IPSS was Int-1 (n=3), Int-2 (n=9), and High (n=2); WHO was RAEB-1 (n=5) and RAEB-2 (n=9); cytogenetic profiles were: 9 (64%) normal; 1 (7%) del (5q); 1 (7%) +8, 1 (7%) −7, 1 (7%) complex, and 1 (7%) unknown; median CR duration at last study assessment was 16 months (range, 3–36) and median OS at last assessment among CR pts was 27 months (range, 7–55). Seven CR pts (50%) evolved to AML a median of 20 months from achieving CR (range, 9–31); 10 (71%) remain alive at last study assessment. Conclusions: The LEN/AZA combination is well-tolerated and highly active in treating higher-risk MDS. The ORR seen in the Phase 1 study was supported by Phase 2 data, with good OS, even among progressing pts. Subsequent randomized studies will compare the LEN/AZA combination to AZA monotherapy and other AZA-based combinations. Disclosures: Sekeres: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Use of lenalidomide, wapproved for lower-risk del(5q), will be discussed in higher-risk patients with MDS. Komrokji:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lancet:Celgene: Research Funding. List:Celgene: Consultancy. Maciejewski:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Abstract 2594 The treatment of adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is challenging. Traditional induction regimens have incorporated vincristine, anthracycline, asparaginase, and steroids that result in high rates of complete remission (CR). However, less than half of pts in CR will be cured. To improve results, high dose cytarabine (HIDAC) has been increasingly incorporated into post-remission therapy. Since HIDAC is often used to treat relapsed ALL, we hypothesized that the prior use of HIDAC would reduce the CR rate when it is applied to pts at the time of their first relapse. Methods: Consecutive pts with ALL in first relapse treated with HIDAC-containing regimens either at the Cleveland Clinic (CC) between the years 1993–2010 or at any institution participating in SWOG trial S9030 (HIDAC 3000 mg/m2 Days 1–5, mitoxantrone 80 mg/m2 Day 1) (1992–1993) were included. HIDAC was defined as a cycle of at least 3000 mg/m2 × 5 days. Remission was defined according to standard criteria. The outcome analysis [CR and overall survival (OS)] was adjusted for the following factors: age, WBC at diagnosis, cytogenetic (CG) risk, immunophenotype, transplant, and prior HIDAC exposure. Results: Sixty-six pts were included (39 treated at CC, and 27 as part of SWOG protocol S9030). All pts received a vincristine/prednisone/anthracycline/steroid-based induction regimen (S8417, CALGB 19802, CALGB 8811) except for 1 pt who was treated with hyperCVAD. Seventeen pts treated at CC had HIDAC incorporated into their initial treatment (1: hyperCVAD; 16: CALGB 19802), but none of the SWOG pts did. The median age was 35 yrs (range 17 to 73). The median WBC at the time of diagnosis for CC pts was 21.4 K/uL (range 0.5–260.0) and median WBC at the time of study registration for SWOG patients was 17.6 K/uL (range 0.4–198.4). Three pts (5%) had a mixed (B/T) lineage leukemia. Three patients had lymphoblastic lymphoma (1 B-cell; 2 T-cell) at the time of initial diagnosis, and had ALL at the time of relapse. For the 39 CC pts, the median time from diagnosis to relapse was 12 mos (range 1–55 mos). CG risk was ascribed by CALGB criteria. Of the 50 pts with evaluable pre-study CG, 20 pts (40%) had normal CG, 18 (36%) miscellaneous, and 12 (24%) poor risk CG. Twenty pts (30%) received HIDAC alone, and 46 (70%) received HIDAC in combination with other drugs for relapsed ALL. The CR rate for all relapsed pts was 32% (CC 36% and SWOG 26%) and was not affected by the addition of other drugs to HIDAC. Twenty-nine patients (44%) were able to proceed to HSCT; and the median OS was 5.4 mos (95% CI: 4.8–6.0 mos). After adjusting for all baseline and demographic factors, the CR rate and OS between pts receiving or not receiving HIDAC during initial treatment was not significantly different. Five of 17 (29%: 95% CI 10%-56%) pts with prior exposure to HIDAC achieved CR while 16 of 49 (33%: 95% CI 20%-48%) pts without prior HIDAC exposure achieved a CR (p=0.80). The 1 year OS (from salvage) for pts treated with HIDAC for relapse who also were treated with prior HIDAC was 12% (95% CI: 0%-27%) and for pts not treated with prior HIDAC was 33% (95% CI: 20%-46%)(p=0.17). Since additional information was available on the CC pts, additional analyses were performed on this subgroup of pts. With the exception of lymphoblastic lymphoma at the time of diagnosis, no other factors correlated with achievement of CR. Achievement of CR was the only factor associated with proceeding to HSCT (79% vs. 36%, p=0.01). Variables associated with improved OS included: lymphoblastic lymphoma at the time of diagnosis (p=0.04; 2 of the 3 pts are still being followed at 80+ and 96+ mos), achievement of CR (p=0.0001), longer remission (> 30 mos, p=0.005), and transplantation (p=0.0001). Conclusion: The outcome of relapsed ALL with HIDAC salvage therapy is dismal, regardless of prior HIDAC exposure; and novel treatments are needed. There was a suggestion that the OS of pts with prior HIDAC exposure may be lower, but further study of 1 year OS with larger pt numbers will be needed to evaluate this. An interesting finding in this study was the favorable outcome of pts with lymphoblastic lymphoma at diagnosis, who subsequently relapsed in the leukemic phase and were treated with HIDAC. However, few pts carried this diagnosis and a larger number of pts are required before drawing firm conclusions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.