Academic literature on the topic 'Public Defender'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Public Defender.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Public Defender"
Anderson, James F., Christine A. VanDross, Esq., Kelley Reinsmith-Jones, and Adam H. Langsam. "Challenges Faced by the Clayton County, Georgia Public Defender’s Office." International Journal of Social Science Studies 6, no. 1 (December 1, 2017): 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i1.2829.
Full textAbramson, Seth. "Public Defender." Iowa Review 36, no. 3 (December 2006): 166–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.17077/0021-065x.6241.
Full textAguiar Aguilar, Azul A. "Gaining Access to Justice: A Subnational Study of the Public Defender’s Office in Mexico." Mexican Law Review 13, no. 2 (January 5, 2021): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2021.2.15089.
Full textKimball, Robert R., and Lisa J. McIntyre. "The Public Defender." Michigan Law Review 86, no. 6 (May 1988): 1336. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1289181.
Full textPOWELL, ROBERT. "Defending against Terrorist Attacks with Limited Resources." American Political Science Review 101, no. 3 (July 26, 2007): 527–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055407070244.
Full textLee, Soonuk. "A Study on the Public Defender." Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University 39, no. 3 (August 30, 2019): 213–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2019.39.3.213.
Full textJaffe, Samantha. ""It's Not You, It's Your Caseload": Using Cronic to Solve Indigent Defense Underfunding." Michigan Law Review, no. 116.8 (2018): 1465. http://dx.doi.org/10.36644/mlr.116.8.its.not.
Full textRamirez, Fanny. "The digital divide in the US criminal justice system." New Media & Society 24, no. 2 (February 2022): 514–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063190.
Full textBrennan, Carrie Dvorak. "The Public Defender System: A Comparative Assessment." Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 25, no. 2 (September 15, 2015): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.18060/7909.0022.
Full textStone, Christopher. "Innovations in Public Defense as an Investment in Better Sentencing." Federal Sentencing Reporter 24, no. 1 (October 1, 2011): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2011.24.1.21.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Public Defender"
Laird, Jess. "Understanding Implicit Bias in Public Defender Social Workers." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2019. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/889.
Full textRoss, Annie Elizabeth. "Wrongful Convictions as a Result of Public Defender Representation." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2010. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1761.
Full textWelch, Teresa Lynn. "The Sources and Extent of Public Defender Occupational Stress." Thesis, Nova Southeastern University, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10824847.
Full textUtah public defenders (n = 96) completed a survey tool that provided data on their sources and extent of occupational stress. The data also indicated any differences in job-stressors scores, perceived stress scores, and occupational burnout scores when comparing public defenders by their demographic factors. Having too many cases is the most stressful of 35 job stressors and is moderately more stressful for female public defenders than for male public defenders, t(94) = –2.98, p = .004, d = .67. The most stressful of six job-stressor categories is structural/systemic, followed closely by prosecutors.
The PSS-10 indicated that a total of 74% of the Utah public defenders perceive themselves as having moderate or high perceived stress. In addition, female public defenders perceive themselves as experiencing more stress than do the male public defenders, t(94) = –3.53, p = .001, d = .80. ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc indicated that public defenders aged 60 years or older experience minimally less perceived stress than do public defenders ages 30–39 and 50–59 years old, F(4,18.64) = 4.748, p = .008, η 2p = .104. The MBI-HSS indicated that Utah public defenders are experiencing moderate (inching towards higher) levels of occupational burnout. ANOVA and Tukey post hoc indicated that public defenders age 60 years or older experience minimally less emotional exhaustion than are public defenders ages 30–39 and 50–59 years old, F(4, 91) = 2.833, p = .029, η2 p = .111.
VILARDI, LEONARDO OSTWALD. "FUNCTIONAL REPRESENTATION AND PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE: A STUDY OF THE PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS PROPOSED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICES OF MINAS GERAIS, RIO DE JANEIRO AND SÃO PAULO." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2017. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=32675@1.
Full textCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DO PESSOAL DE ENSINO SUPERIOR
PROGRAMA DE SUPORTE À PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DE INSTS. DE ENSINO
A Constituição da República de 1988 consolidou uma ampla gama de direitos fundamentais, juntamente com uma arquitetura institucional que buscou dar concretude a esses direitos, através de instrumentos jurídicos processuais que legitimaram a propositura de demandas sobre direitos difusos e coletivos, fortalecendo o poder judiciário e a representação funcional. Destaca-se nessa arquitetura o papel das Ações Civis Públicas (ACPs), com a legitimação da sociedade civil para realizar a propositura de tal ação. Entretanto, junto à sociedade instituiu-se outro ator capaz de mobilizar tais instrumentos em defesa da sociedade e dos princípios democráticos, o Ministério Público (MP). Neste cenário, é que a Defensoria Pública, instituição inicialmente integrante do poder executivo e com atribuição de representar em juízo parcelas subalternas da população, conseguiu adquirir autonomia funcional e administrativa. A mobilização da Defensoria promoveu desdobramentos no âmbito interno e externo de tal instituição. No âmbito externo, destaca-se a possibilidade de propor Ação Civil Pública. Dessa forma, a questão-problema que se coloca para a pesquisa é: Como a Defensoria Pública vem exercendo a prerrogativa de tutelar direitos difusos e coletivos? Frente a isso, assume-se como objetivo geral mapear todas as ACPs propostas pelas Defensorias Públicas de Minas Gerias (DPMG), Rio de Janeiro (DPRJ) e São Paulo (DPESP) nos últimos 5 anos. Desdobram-se como objetivos específicos: mapear as ACPs propostas nos últimos cincos anos nos estados pesquisados; descrever a evolução institucional dos órgão estudados; compreender a opção da CF/88 pelo acesso à justiça pela mão do estado; e realizar uma análise crítica do conceito de representação funcional. Tal caminho possibilitou uma reflexão crítica acerca da expansão da representação funcional e da judiciliazação em nosso país que, até o momento, não conheceu limites.
The Republican Constitution of 1988 consolidated a wide range of fundamental rights, alongside an institutional architecture which aimed to materialize such rights, through judicial process instruments that legitimized the proposal of demands regarding diffuse and collective rights, strengthening the judicial power and the functional representation. Within this architecture, the role of the Public Civil Actions (ACPs, in Portuguese) can be highlighted, with the legitimacy of civil society to realize such proposed action. However, within society it was instituted another actor capable of mobilizing such instruments in defense of society and democratic principles, the Public Ministry (MP, in Portuguese). In this scenario, the Public Defense, an institution that at first was part of the executive branch with the task of representing in court the lower classes of population, managed to gain functional and administrative autonomy. The mobilization of the Public Defense promoted outcomes within and outside such institution. In the external realm, we highlight the possibility of proposing a Public Civilian Action. Therefore, the guiding question of this research is: How has the Public Defense been exercising the prerogative of tutelage of diffuse and collective rights? As such, we take as a main goal to map all the ACPs proposed by the Public Defense of Minas Gerais (DPMG, in Portuguese), Rio de Janeiro (DPRJ) and São Paulo (DPSP) in the last 5 years. The specific goals unfold in: mapping the ACPs proposed in the last five years in the researched states; describing the institutional evolution of the studied organs; comprehending the option made by the Constitution of 1988 of access to justice by the hand of the state; and conducting a critical analysis of the concept of functional representation. Such path made it possible to reflect critically regarding the expansion of functional representation as well as about the judicialization of our country, which has known to boundaries so far.
Hall, James Patrick. "An Empirical Study of Appointed Counsel Effectiveness in Jury Trials." ScholarWorks, 2014. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/61.
Full textBega, Carolina Brambila. "Curadoria especial: tutela da vulnerabilidade processual: análise da efetividade dessa atuação." Universidade de São Paulo, 2012. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2137/tde-18022013-105924/.
Full textThis research introduces a systemized study of the special curator´s activity by emphasizing its capacity to provide protection for those in situation of procedural vulnerability. Overcoming the study of the procedural vulnerability, the research shows that the legal rules that determine the special curator´s activity are related to litigants that are in special situations which compromise the practice of its legal rights in court. After providing the special curators development history, the research leads to the allocation of the curator function on to the Public Defender´s Office. The research also analyses the capacity of such activity in order to protect the rights of the defendant in default cited by edict, of the arrested defendant, and of the minor or disable group lacking legal capacity without legal guardian or trustee. Furthermore, the research checks out how the performance of the special curator activity is able to provide a way of overcoming harmful effects from procedural vulnerability in several stages of the civil procedure. Moreover, the research verifies case-laws regarding the special curator activity in the Brazilian Supreme Court of Justice, Brazilian Federal Court of Justice and State of São Paulo´s Court of Appeals. In several opportunities the results are well-founded to the litigant in procedural vulnerability. The information presented regarding the special curator´s activity in the State of São Paulo is able to demonstrate that the legal proceeding quantity and its direct costs are reasonable. An opinion poll on the special curator activities among the Public Defenders reveals their evaluation regarding this subject. Finally, the research put together all the information provided, concluding that the special curator´s activity is able to assist and assure the full defense and the right of adversary proceedings for those in procedural vulnerability situation.
Carnielli, Fiorenza Zandonade. "A cidadania e a sua instituição: estudo de comunicação pública sobre a Defensoria do Rio Grande do Sul." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/132811.
Full textThis Master Thesis articulates the concepts related to public communication, citizenship and institution aiming to analyse public communication processes focusing in the construction of citizenship, from the perspective of Rio Grande do Sul´s Public Defender´s work directed to the defence of social excluded individuals´ rights. The analysis focus in the Public Defender as an institution constituted by the normative, factual and strategic perspectives. The main theoretical concepts worked report to public interest, as discussed by Arendt (2014), Sennett (1988) e Bobbio (2012), to citizenship (MARSHALL, 1967; GIDDENS, 2008; CARVALHO, 2013; DAGNINO, 2004) and human rights, starting from the genesis of values proposed by Joas (2012). The communicational approach derives from the communicative interactions concept, according to França (1998), develops the public communication concept articulating, mainly, the propositions from Weber (2007, 2009, 2011) and Esteves (2011), and includes the organizational communication studies with Baldissera (2014), Marques (2015), Mumby (2009) e Deetz (2010) and strategy in Pérez (2012). The observation about institution is made from Castoriadis (1982), Braga (2010, 2012), Berger and Luckmann (1998). The case study is the methodological option for the Rio Grande do Sul Public Defender approach as a particular institutional dimension. The methodological procedures include federal legislation documental and bibliographic research about the institution, its activities, the public defenders and the persons aided, in addition with communication practices and products. The Rio Grande do Sul Public Defender analysis focuses in the normative (historical descriptive analysis), factual (descriptive analysis and from the interaction situations) and strategic (descriptive analysis of strategies and themes and voices analysis). The articulation of these institutional perspectives allowed surrounding the public communication network about the public interest subject and the citizenship rights. Therefore, the Rio Grande do Sul Public Defender is a rich institutional space in terms of communicational interaction, capable of increasing the citizenship experience and prioritise the public interest.
Lima, Rafael Negreiros Dantas de. "A disputa pelo direito à cidade no campo jurídico uma análise a partir de casos da Defensoria Pública do Estado de São Paulo." Universidade de São Paulo, 2018. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/16/16137/tde-10012019-154834/.
Full textThe period after the Federal Constitution of 1988 was marked by intense normative achievements over the cities, with advanced legislation, however, which did not result in a significant change in the conception of public policies or in the jurisprudence of the Courts. The presupposition of Law as an autonomous, neutral and universal system, which brings solutions to all concrete cases, through the dogmatic method, does not allow us to arrive at satisfactory justifications for this ineffectiveness. The present dissertation intends to present an analysis on how the dispute for the right to the city in the juridical field develops, explaining the approaches with which this subject is treated in the legal practice. Through the observation of concrete cases in which there is a confrontation between legal institutions and professionals, it is sought to demonstrate how they compete for the monopoly of imposing their world view, masking the relations of power by the legal discourse. In addition, it uses the legal topics to assess, in each case, how the thinking of lawyers develops in the face of seemingly unsolvable problems. Based on this methodology, it is aimed at a presentation of the power game around the right to the city that occurs in the legal field, evaluating the possibilities of the conception of the right to the city in a logic of social justice, being consolidated and applied effectively, giving the most fragile part of the population access to the goods and services of the city.
Godoy, Arion Escorsin de. "A cidade como ambiente das reivindicações cidadãs por moradia e o papel de mediação política e jurídica da defensoria pública." reponame:Repositório Institucional da UCS, 2015. https://repositorio.ucs.br/handle/11338/958.
Full textSubmitted by Ana Guimarães Pereira (agpereir@ucs.br) on 2015-06-25T17:16:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Arion Escorsin de Godoy.pdf: 1288062 bytes, checksum: 0cb1d29900f06e157d576e370039d0ba (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-25T17:16:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Arion Escorsin de Godoy.pdf: 1288062 bytes, checksum: 0cb1d29900f06e157d576e370039d0ba (MD5)
The research is an analysis on the interaction between urban space and citizenship, focusing on the performance of the Public Defender as a mediator of the political, social and legal process the claiming of the house, intending to establish a sociological and legal background reflection. The research problem is to identify the role of the Public Defender, notably with regard to modalities / performance possibilities, such as state institution, in mediating the claim of urban conflicts of the implementation of decent housing for vulnerable groups. The central hypothesis is based on the assertion that judicial proceedings dealing with the claim of the right to housing for vulnerable people do not show successful, so should the Public Defender as an institution of access to the justice system, extrajudicial seek alternative claim the right in question, always attentive to the cultural peculiarities that make up the Brazilian citizenship and forming their assisted public. It is considered that theoretical research object involves the notions of citizenship, urban space and housing, which were collated with the real object represented by the Public Defender, as a mediator of housing claim processes through law. The time frame is made with emphasis given from 2000, at which time the house was raised to the category of fundamental right. The research falls within the legal and sociological dimension and is used deductive reasoning. For this, we analyze the dynamics proper citizenship in the national context, aiming link it to social unrest and political contemporary urban scene. In the end, the debate is about the insertion of the Public Defender in this unstable scenario, always comparing the normative predictions with the reality experienced in order not to get lost in an ethereal dogmatism.
Amorim, Ana M?nica Anselmo de. "Acesso ? justi?a enquanto direito fundamental: efetiva??o pela defensoria p?blica." Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 2011. http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13925.
Full textThe Federal Constitution of 1988 is recognized for its enlargement in the face of large amount of provisions that make it up, among which many are fundamental rights. The fundamental rules set up the foundation of a democratic state, however, are the necessary legal mechanisms to be effective, its exercise is not enough merely to state them, but to offer ways for them to stop being just written standard on paper, and come to be viewed and exercised day-to-day. In this sense, access to justice presents itself in our times, as a cornerstone for a just society dictates. In this light, access to justice can be seen as the most fundamental of rights, which translates as instruments able to safeguard the fundamental rights not only against the action/omission violating the state but also the very particular. Furthermore, access to justice within the legal country, is not right for everyone, despite the willingness of the Citizen Charter in its article 5, paragraph LXXIV, ensuring that the State shall provide full and free legal assistance to those in need. More than half of the population lives in poverty and can?t afford to pay legal fees or court costs as well as a bump in their own ignorance of their rights. The judiciary, in their primary function, is in charge of trying to correct the violation of the rights, intending to effect a true distributive justice, serving as a paradigm for the promotion of substantive equality of human beings, however, is difficult and tortuous access Justice for those without financial resources. In this vein, we present the Public Defender, as keeper of the masses in its institutional role, defending a disadvantage, in the words, as a mechanism for effective access to justice, ensuring therefore fundamental rights. Public Defenders arise at the time or much discussion highlights the priority of actual access to justice, custody, therefore, intimate bond with the pursuit of fundamental rights, in which, that advance the broad range of rights, without whom could defend them or guardianship them
A Constitui??o Federal de 1988 ? reconhecida por sua hipertrofia face a grande quantidade de dispositivos legais que a comp?e, dentre os quais, muitos s?o os direitos fundamentais. As normas fundamentais configuram o alicerce do Estado Democr?tico de Direito, no entanto, necess?rios s?o os mecanismos legais ? sua efetiva??o, ao seu exerc?cio, n?o sendo suficiente apenas enunci?-los, mas sim, oferecer meios para que estes deixem de ser apenas norma escrita no papel, e passem a ser visualizados e exercidos no dia-a-dia. Neste sentir, o acesso ? Justi?a apresenta-se, hodiernamente, como viga mestra para uma sociedade dita justa. Sob este prisma, o acesso ? Justi?a pode ser tido como o mais fundamental dos direitos, vez que traduz os instrumentos h?beis a resguardar os direitos fundamentais n?o s? face a a??o/omiss?o violadora do Estado, mas tamb?m, do pr?prio particular. Outrossim, o acesso ? Justi?a dentro da ordem jur?dica p?tria, n?o ? direito de todos, em que pese a disposi??o da Carta Cidad? em seu artigo 5?, inciso LXXIV, garantir que o Estado prestar? assist?ncia jur?dica integral e gratuita aos que dela necessitarem. Mais da metade da popula??o brasileira vive em situa??o de pobreza, n?o podendo dispor de recursos para custear honor?rios advocat?cios, ou despesas processuais, bem como esbarram no pr?prio desconhecimento de seus direitos. O Poder Judici?rio, em sua fun??o prec?pua, encarrega-se de tentar corrigir a viola??o dos direitos, tencionando a efetiva??o de uma verdadeira justi?a distributiva, servindo como paradigma ao fomento da igualdade material do ser humano, entretanto, dif?cil e tortuoso ? o acesso ? Justi?a para aqueles que n?o possuem condi??es financeiras. Nesta senda, apresenta-se a Defensoria P?blica, como guardi? das massas, em sua fun??o institucional, na defesa dos hipossuficientes, ou seja, como instrumento para a efetiva??o do acesso ? Justi?a, garantindo pois, os direitos fundamentais. Os Defensores P?blicos surgem no momento em que muito se discute ou se destaca a prioridade da efetiva??o do acesso ? Justi?a, guarda, portanto, ?ntimo liame com a persegui??o dos direitos fundamentais, na qual, de que adiantaria o vasto leque de direitos, sem quem pudesse defend?-los ou tutel?-los
Books on the topic "Public Defender"
Minnesota. Legislature. Office of the Legislative Auditor. Program Evaluation Division. Public defender system. Saint Paul, MN: Program Evaluation Division, Office of the Legislative Auditor, State of Minnesota, 1992.
Find full textMaryland. General Assembly. Department of Legislative Services. Office of Legislative Audits. Office of the Public Defender. Baltimore, Md: Office of Legislative Audits, Dept. of Legislative Services, Maryland General Assembly, 2009.
Find full textRubin, John. North Carolina public defender manual. [Chapel Hill]: Institute of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1998.
Find full textLangton, Lynn. State public defender programs, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2010.
Find full textHewett, Joan. Public defender: Lawyer for the people. New York: Lodestar Books, 1991.
Find full textAudits, Maryland General Assembly Department of Legislative Services Office of Legislative. Audit report: Office of the Public Defender. Baltimore, Maryland: Office of Legislative Audits, Department of Legislative Services, Maryland General Assembly, 2014.
Find full textMaryland. General Assembly. Department of Legislative Services. Office of Legislative Audits. Audit report: Office of the Public Defender. Baltimore, Md: Office of Legislative Audits, 2011.
Find full textRubin, John. North Carolina defender manual. 2nd ed. [Chapel Hill, N.C.]: Institute of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2002.
Find full textCasper, Dale E. Regulating the public defender: Journal articles, 1983-1988. Monticello, Ill., USA: Vance Bibliographies, 1989.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Public Defender"
Henning, Kristin, Randy Hertz, and Hannah McElhinny. "Specializing in juvenile defense: the D.C. Public Defender Service as a case study." In Rights, Race, and Reform, 114–27. New York, NY : Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315105901-7.
Full textKleiman, Matthew, and Cynthia G. Lee. "Public Defenders." In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 4134–43. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_37.
Full textApt, Greg. "Worthless Public Defenders." In Never Threaten to Eat Your Co-Workers: Best of Blogs, 227–31. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0678-1_61.
Full textMachan, Tibor R. "Democracy in Public Life and Corporate Management." In Libertarianism Defended, 303–10. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315250526-25.
Full textPeters, B. Guy. "Defense Policy." In American Public Policy, 274–92. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18388-3_13.
Full textGreenwood, David. "Defence." In Public Expenditure Policy, 1985–86, 101–19. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08252-0_5.
Full textRatti, Luca. "Defence." In Handbook of Public Policy in Europe, 26–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230522756_3.
Full textGaufman, Elizaveta. "Sexuality Must Be Defended." In Security Threats and Public Perception, 145–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43201-4_7.
Full textDuindam, Simon. "The public good “Defense”." In Contributions to Economics, 17–34. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50005-3_2.
Full textGiegerich, Bastian. "Public Opinion And Defence." In Routledge Handbook Of Defence Studies, 291–301. Abingdon, Oxon: New York, NY: Routledge, [2018]: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315650463-24.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Public Defender"
Sebba, Paulo L., Rafael T. de Sousa, Maristela Holanda, Aleteia P. F. Araujo, and Ana Paula Bernardi da Silva. "Database Administration: A Case Study at Public Defender of the Union in Brazil." In 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/cisti.2019.8760831.
Full textGuo, Qingyu, Bo An, Branislav Bošanský, and Christopher Kiekintveld. "Comparing Strategic Secrecy and Stackelberg Commitment in Security Games." In Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/516.
Full textBondi, Elizabeth. "Visionary Security: Using Uncertain Real-Time Information in Signaling Games." In Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/902.
Full textLipatov, A. V., and O. A. Kazakevich. "FORMATION OF THE IMAGE OF ALEXANDER NEVSKY AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE CULTURAL SPACE OF THE CITY: ON THE EXAMPLE OF VOLGOGRAD." In Культура, наука, образование: проблемы и перспективы. Нижневартовский государственный университет, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36906/ksp-2021/13.
Full textMirhaji, Parsa, Jiajie Zhang, Arunkumar Srinivasan, Rachel L. Richesson, and Jack W. Smith. "Knowledge-based public health situation awareness." In Defense and Security, edited by Edward M. Carapezza. SPIE, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.548180.
Full text"Protein beta-defenses 126 and its relationship with infertility." In International Conference on Medicine, Public Health and Biological Sciences. CASRP Publishing Company, Ltd. Uk, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/mphbs.2016.156.
Full textJormakka, Jorma. "Communications over Public Networks for Network-Assisted Defense." In MILCOM 2007 - IEEE Military Communications Conference. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/milcom.2007.4455205.
Full textMILANDRU, Marius. "THE IMPORTANCE OF GOODS AND SERVICES REQUISITION PROCESS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST." In SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE AIR FORCE. Publishing House of “Henri Coanda” Air Force Academy, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19062/2247-3173.2021.22.3.
Full textMirhaji, Parsa, Yanko F. Michea, Jiajie Zhang, and Samuel W. Casscells. "Situational awareness in public health preparedness settings." In Defense and Security, edited by Edward M. Carapezza. SPIE, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.607114.
Full textIvan, Lucian. "Management of Covid-19 Crisis at the Level of Defence Industry." In International Conference Innovative Business Management & Global Entrepreneurship. LUMEN Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/ibmage2020/21.
Full textReports on the topic "Public Defender"
Gannon, James M. Operationalizing Defense Support to Public Diplomacy. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada463278.
Full textAshley, Caitlyn, Elizabeth Spencer Berthiaume, Philip Berzin, Rikki Blassingame, Stephanie Bradley Fryer, John Cox, E. Samuel Crecelius, et al. Law and Policy Resource Guide: A Survey of Eminent Domain Law in Texas and the Nation. Edited by Gabriel Eckstein. Texas A&M University School of Law Program in Natural Resources Systems, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/eenrs.eminentdomainguide.
Full textHarmon, Matthew F. Defense Support to Public Diplomacy: Options for the Operational Commander. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada502997.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Department of Defense Plan to Establish Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada614321.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Department of Defense Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. Program Overview, 2000 Army Worldwide Public Affairs Symposium. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada375986.
Full textAgan, Amanda, Matthew Freedman, and Emily Owens. Is Your Lawyer a Lemon? Incentives and Selection in the Public Provision of Criminal Defense. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w24579.
Full textSiegel, Adam B. The Wartime Diversion of U.S. Navy Forces in Response to Public Demands for Augmented Coastal Defense. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, November 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada598478.
Full textKleinknecht, Henry F., Anella J. Oliva, Rebecca L. Yovich, Nicole M. Ellis, and Meredith H. Johnson. Defense Infrastructure: DoD Workforce Employed to Conduct Public-Private Competitions Under the DoD Competitive Sourcing Program. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada432640.
Full textRaffoul, Jaqueline. Documento de Trabalho. Departamento de Estudos Econômicos, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52896/dee.dt2.021.
Full textFletcher, James P. The Department of Defense Commitment to the Destruction and Remediation of Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel: Can Present Policy and Approaches Effectively Meet the Challenges to Eliminate the Threat to the Public? Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada431701.
Full text