To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Publicatio.
Journal articles on the topic 'Publicatio'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Publicatio.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Klingenberg, Georg. "Francesco Salerno, Dalla „consecrado“ alla „publicatio bonorum“." Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 110, no. 1 (August 1, 1993): 748–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.1993.110.1.748.
Full text
2
Ahmad Nazri, Mohd Zakree, Rohayu Abdul Ghani, and Mas Ayu Che Razali. "Using Data Mining to Predict Academician Publication Output." Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences 2, no. 4 (December 4, 2018): 110–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31580/apss.v2i4.396.
Full textAbstract:
This research focuses on predicting academician performance in terms of publication productivity and investigate the factors that affect academicians’ achievement. Previous studies have shown that there are many important variables when analysing academicians’ productivity at the individual level. This study investigates how scientific publication rate by individual is influenced by factors such as gender, age, number of research grant and academic position of the researchers using decision tree. Having a decision rules, university leaders can understand upcoming trends with respect to leadership requirements and academicians needs. It is also helping university managements understand challenges and therefore can deploy the right strategies for human resource management interventions. The discovered knowledge among the attributes obtained from mining the data can be used to predict the university productivity output. The study, involving almost 3000 university lecturers, shows a number of interesting patterns that can be used for predicting publicatio output.
3
Dyjakowska, Marzena. "Fund Collection through Litigation by the State Treasury in the Roman Empire (with Special Reference to the First Three Centuries A.D.)." Studia Ceranea 2 (December 30, 2012): 27–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.02.03.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses the confiscation of property (publicatio bonorum) as a source of revenue for the fiscus in ancient Rome. The term fiscus means, among other things, the public property, State funds, but also the private property of emperors. The confiscated property could be adjudged not only to aerarium – the State Treasury (publicare), but also to the personal treasury of emperors, and trials seem to have been inspired to supply it. The most „successful” accusation was connected with the crime of lese-majesty: the scope of this crime was especially wide and it was easy to convict the defendant. The Senate often voted for adjudgement of the confiscated property in respect of the Emperor, especially if the convict had received some benefits from him. This practice turned into a rule and the Emperor’s treasury became the sole beneficiary of publicatio bonorum. Some emperors are especially known as rulers accumulating their private property on confiscated goods (Caligula, Septimius Severus, Domitian). A portion of those goods was due to the children of the defendant; some rescripts issued by the emperors even ordered to transfer his whole property in the first place to his descendants. In spite of the rule that it was necessary to find the defendant guilty to confiscate his property, the publicatio bonorum was not available; when he committed suicide before the sentence, a presumption was made that this act was equal to a guilty plea. According to another rule – confessus pro indicato est – the defendant was convicted unless his suicide was justified. The personal belongings (pannicularia) were to be confiscated, too, but only after the conviction.
4
Goldfarb, Miguel Andrés. "Servicíos publicos: caracterización, fundamentos y evolución en el derecho argentino." Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental 7, no. 2 (July 1, 2016): 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.socioambienta.07.002.ao09.
Full textAbstract:
Los servicios públicos constituyen una verdadera institución del derecho. Es objeto de estudio de las ciencias jurídicas junto con otras ciencias sociales. Es relevante precisar su concepto a los fines de definir en la praxis qué actividades son efectivamente servicio público, puesto que estas serán reguladas por un subsistema diferenciado de derecho público con grandes implicancias prácticas. La publicatio constituye hoy una herramienta útil a tales fines. La intervención del estado en la economía a través de la técnica servicio público tiene hoy sustento constitucional y se sostiene en el enorme impacto social de las necesidades que estas prestaciones cubren. Finalmente, en Argentina se ha demostrado que el rol del estado fue mutando conforme cambiaron los tiempos políticos y las ideologías imperantes en cada etapa de la historia del país por lo que ha quedo expuesta la estrecha relación entre la institución con la política y la economía, consolidándose en los últimos años un esquema mixto dotado de pragmatismo.
5
Gutierrez, Angela, Lourdes R. Guerrero, Heather E. McCreath, and Steven P. Wallace. "Mentoring Experiences and Publication Productivity among Early Career Biomedical Investigators and Trainees." Ethnicity & Disease 31, no. 2 (April 14, 2021): 273–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.18865/ed.31.2.273.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: To identify which mentoring domains influence publication productivity among early career researchers and trainees and whether publication productivity differs between underrepresented minority (URM) and well-represented groups (WRGs). The mentoring aspects that promote publication productivity remain unclear. Advancing health equity requires a diverse workforce, yet URM trainees are less likely to publish and URM investigators are less likely to obtain federal research grants, relative to WRG counterparts.Participants: Early career biomedical investigators and trainees from the National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN), N=115.Methods: A mentoring-focused online follow-up survey was administered to respondents of the NRMN Annual Survey who self-identified as mentees. Publications were identified from a public database and validated with participant CV data. Bivariate and multivariate analyses tested the associations of publication productivity with mentoring domains.Results: URM investigators and trainees had fewer publications (M = 7.3) than their WRG counterparts (M = 13.8). Controlling for career stage and social characteristics, those who worked on funded projects, and received grant-writing or research mentorship, had a higher probability of any publications. Controlling for URM status, gender, and career stage, mentorship on grant-writing and funding was positively associated with publication count (IRR=1.72). Holding career stage, gender, and mentoring experiences constant, WRG investigators and trainees had more publications than their URM counterparts (IRR=1.66).Conclusions: Grant-writing mentorship is particularly important for publication productivity. Future research should investigate whether grant-writing mentorship differentially impacts URM and WRG investigators and should investigate how and why grant-writing mentorship fosters increased publication productivity. Ethn Dis. 2021;31(2):273-282; doi:10.18865/ed.31.2.273
6
Avila, Edilaine, and Cláudia Regina Ziliotto Bomfá. "Enhanced publications: um estudo da plataforma Public Library of Science (PLOS)." AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento 10, no. 1 (February 1, 2021): 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v10i1.76846.
Full textAbstract:
Introdução: Identifica e apresenta quais recursos das enhanced publications podem ser utilizados pelos periódicos científicos digitais. Apresenta, como objeto de análise, a Public Library Of Science (PLOS), a partir da seguinte questão norteadora: quais características identificam uma publicação científica como uma enhanced publication e como essas particularidades são utilizadas pelos periódicos científicos? Método: Pesquisa de natureza qualitativa, em nível exploratório, que, com um levantamento, culminou em uma análise de conteúdo dos dados encontrados. Resultados: Identifica e analisa as seguintes características que definem uma publicação como enhanced publication: hipertextualidade, multimidialidade, interatividade, memória, personalização e ubiquidade. Conclusão: As características de uma enhanced publication foram definidas, além de ter sido demonstrado como a PLOS trabalhar esses recursos com o intuito de ampliar sua visibilidade.
7
Vergara Blanco, Alejandro. "El nuevo servicio público abierto a la competencia: De la publicatio al libre acceso. Coherencia de las viejas técnicas concesional y autorizacional." Revista Derecho Administrativo Económico, no. 12 (2004): 33–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/redae.12.3.
Full text
8
Lapeña, José Florencio F. "Publication and Privacy: Science and Sorcery?" Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 24, no. 2 (November 29, 2009): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v24i2.671.
Full textAbstract:
“See my thoughts and feelings fill the paper,
seems I’ll never, never really know
why when other people talk and chatter,
I would rather, rather write a song”1
“Publish or perish,” the battlecry of modern academia, may well be perceived by some as a call to bare their deepest and darkest secrets. Indeed, “publication” (from the Middle English publicacioun, from Middle French publication, from Latin publication-, publicatio, from publicare, from publicus public)2 literally means “to make public,” confronting the comfortable secrecy and seclusion associated with privacy.3
The distinction between publication and privacy also distinguishes science from sorcery. The scientist-scholar engages in the act or process of publishing observations for all to see, while the sorcerer strives to secure secrets and spells from prying eyes. While scientific observation and magical thinking about natural forces and their control may not always differ much, the manner by which the former are made available to public scrutiny and question, testing and replication, rebuttal or verification, distinguish one brand of “truth” from the other. In this vein, invoking the latter anecdotally or under the guise of authority may smack of mere sorcery
In contemporary terms, interesting cases and trends, personal clinical observations and innovations and such other accumulations of wisdom, can well be kept to oneself, recorded in private, or shared with a small circle of colleagues or trainees. Unless these are brought to light and published, they do not join the scholarly stream, and will neither contribute to, nor benefit from true science. Instead, they may well perpetuate an internally-consistent, albeit inaccurate or downright false, view of reality. Exposing one’s ideas and words to possible rejection or revision by the judges and jury of editors and reviewers, not to mention readers, is no easy task either, but it is only by making ideas public that scientists gain the opportunity to dialogue, build on each other’s contributions and join the documented and ongoing history of their field.4
Publication also has other rewards, not the least of which is academic promotion and tenure. We particularly challenge PSOHNS Fellows to set the example by publishing and leading the way for our diplomates and residents.
__________________________________________________
It gives me great pleasure to announce that The Singapore Declaration on Equitable
Access To Health Information In The Western Pacific Region was adopted during the Second
Joint Meeting of the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME) and the
Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM) convened by the World Health Organization
on the occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Singapore Medical Journal . It was launched at
the International Forum on Academic Medical Publishing on November 6, 2009 organized
jointly by the Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ) and National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCC),
with the support of the Singapore Medical Association (SMA) and Asia Pacific Association of
Medical Journal Editors (APAME). The Declaration is simultaneously reproduced in full as a
Special Announcement in several regional journals.
9
Ainsworth, GC, and Grace M. Waterhouse. "Miscellaneous publications: New publication 1989." Mycologist 3, no. 2 (April 1989): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0269-915x(89)80091-6.
Full text
10
Slavin, Konstantin V. "Publication world and world publications." Surgical Neurology 44, no. 1 (July 1995): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00178-6.
Full text
11
BRITTON, J., and A. J. KNOX. "Duplicate publication, redundant publication, and disclosure of closely related publications." Thorax 54, no. 5 (May 1, 1999): 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.5.378.
Full text
12
Woolley, Karen L. "Coincidence? Publications Expertise Boosts Publication Output." Journal of Surgical Education 71, no. 1 (January 2014): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.007.
Full text
13
"Normas para publicação (norms for publication)." PORTO ARTE: Revista de Artes Visuais 20, no. 34 (May 1, 2016): 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/2179-8001.62330.
Full text
14
Editores, Equipe Editorial. "Normas para publicação [ Norms for publication ]." PORTO ARTE: Revista de Artes Visuais 22, no. 36 (December 30, 2017): 277. http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/2179-8001.79603.
Full text
15
Böckmann, Eva C., E. S. Debus, and R. T. Grundmann. "Publication activity of chief and consultant general/visceral surgeons in German university hospitals—a ten-year analysis." Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 406, no. 5 (July 26, 2021): 1659–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02241-6.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Purpose The publication activity of 38 German general/visceral surgery university departments, documented by first or last authorship from staff surgeons (chief and consultants), was evaluated. Methods The observation period extended from 2007 to 2017 and all PubMed-listed publications were considered. Impact factor (IF) was evaluated through the publishing journal’s 5-year IF in 2016, as was the IF for each individual publication. Ranking was expressed in quartiles. Results The staff surgeons of the 38 departments comprised 442 surgeons, of which only 351 (79.4%) were active as first or last authors. Four thousand six hundred and ninety-nine publications published in 702 journals were recorded. The four leading departments in publication number published as much as the last 20 departments (1330 vs. 1336 publications, respectively). The mean of the first (most active) department quartile was 19.6 publications, the second 15.4, the third 11.0, and the last quartile 7.6 per publishing surgeon. The total cumulative impact factor was 14,130. When examining the mean number of publications per publishing surgeons per the 10 year period, the mean of the first quartile was 57.9 cumulative IF, the second 45.0, the third 29.5, and the fourth quartile 17.1. With 352 (7.5%) publications, the most frequently used journal was Chirurg, followed by Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery with 274 (5.8%) publications. Pancreas-related topics led in terms of publication number and IF generated per individual publication. Conclusion A significant difference in publication performance of individual departments was apparent that cannot be explained by staff number. This indicates that there are as yet unknown factors responsible for minor publication activity in many university departments.
16
Kanagasundari, S., G. T. Kohila, and N. Prasannakumari. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Authorship Productivity and Collaborative Research in Blogosphere." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, S1 (February 5, 2019): 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.s1.214.
Full textAbstract:
An analysis of 718 publications published by social area on Blogosphere during 2002-2018 and indexed by web of science online Database indicates that the publication output in the Global Research Publications. The highest numbers of papers were published during the year 2010 and 2013 with 76 records, the followed by 72 papers in 2009, 69 papers in 2015 and 67 records of the publication in the year 2011. The least number of publication in the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 with only one record of the publications due to the initial stage of web developments. Overall, 1368 authors contributed 520 publications in the journal and institutions with 668 records of the articles. Contribution of journals, ranking of authors, preference of publication and frequency of keywords were also analysed in this paper.
17
Bu, Yi, Ludo Waltman, and Yong Huang. "A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications." Quantitative Science Studies 2, no. 1 (2021): 155–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00109.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The citation impact of a scientific publication is usually seen as a one-dimensional concept. We introduce a multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of a publication. In addition to the level of citation impact, quantified by the number of citations received by a publication, we also conceptualize and operationalize the depth and breadth and the dependence and independence of the citation impact of a publication. The proposed framework distinguishes between publications that have a deep citation impact, typically in a relatively narrow research area, and publications that have a broad citation impact, probably covering a wider area of research. It also makes a distinction between publications that are strongly dependent on earlier work and publications that make a more independent scientific contribution. We use our multidimensional citation impact framework to report basic descriptive statistics on the citation impact of highly cited publications in all scientific disciplines. In addition, we present a detailed case study focusing on the field of scientometrics. The proposed citation impact framework provides a more in-depth understanding of the citation impact of a publication than a traditional one-dimensional perspective.
18
Carvalho, Christopher, Matthew Fuller, Emmanuel Quaidoo, Ahson Haider, Jonathan Rodriguez, Angela Wong, Mindy Duong, and Robert Rodriguez. "A Review of COVID-19-Related Publications and Lag Times During the First Six Months of the Year 2020." Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 22, no. 4 (June 29, 2021): 958–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.3.51737.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: Considering the need for information regarding approaches to prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we sought to determine publication lag times of COVID-19-related original research articles published in top general medicine and emergency medicine (EM) journals. We further sought to characterize the types of COVID-19 publications within these journals. Methods: We reviewed 125 top-ranked general medicine journals and 20 top-ranked EM-specific journals for COVID-19-related publications. We abstracted article titles and manuscript details for each COVID-19-related article published between January 1–June 30, 2020, and categorized articles as one of the following: original research; case report; review; or commentary. We abstracted data for preprint publications over the same time period and determined whether articles from the general medicine and EM journals had been previously published as preprint articles. Our primary outcomes were the following: 1) lag time (days) between global cumulative World Health Organization (WHO)-confirmed cases of COVID-19 and publications; 2) lag times between preprint article publication and peer-reviewed journal publication; and 3) lag times between submission and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Our secondary outcome was to characterize COVID-19-related publications. Results: The first original research publications appeared in a general medicine journal 20 days and in an EM journal 58 days after the first WHO-confirmed case of COVID-19. We found median and mean lag times between preprint publications and journal publications of 32 days (19, 49) and 36 days (22) for general medicine journals, and 26 days (16, 36) and 25 days (13) for EM journals. Median and mean lag times between submission and publication were 30 days (19, 45) and 35 days (13) for general medicine journals, and 23 days (11, 39) and 27 days (19) for EM journals. Of 2530 general medicine journal articles and 351 EM journal articles, 28% and 23.6% were original research. We noted substantial closing of the preprint to peer-reviewed publication (160 days pre-pandemic) and peer-reviewed journal submission to publication (194 days pre-pandemic) lag times for COVID-19 manuscripts. Conclusion: We found a rapid and robust response with shortened publication lag times to meet the need for the publication of original research and other vital medical information related to COVID-19 during the first six months of 2020.
19
Haunschild, Robin, and Lutz Bornmann. "Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers." Scientometrics 126, no. 6 (April 26, 2021): 5181–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03962-7.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractMethodological mistakes, data errors, and scientific misconduct are considered prevalent problems in science that are often difficult to detect. In this study, we explore the potential of using data from Twitter for discovering problems with publications. In this case study, we analyzed tweet texts of three retracted publications about COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019)/SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and their retraction notices. We did not find early warning signs in tweet texts regarding one publication, but we did find tweets that casted doubt on the validity of the two other publications shortly after their publication date. An extension of our current work might lead to an early warning system that makes the scientific community aware of problems with certain publications. Other sources, such as blogs or post-publication peer-review sites, could be included in such an early warning system. The methodology proposed in this case study should be validated using larger publication sets that also include a control group, i.e., publications that were not retracted.
20
Rahimova, Nailay. "Analysis of publication activity at research institutes." Scientific and Technical Libraries, no. 11 (November 1, 2016): 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2016-11-44-50.
Full textAbstract:
Publication activity of TatNIPIneft institute for 5-year period (2011-2015), research papers citation (data of the Russian Science Citation Index), average number of citations per publication, distribution by publication types, are analyzed. The core periodicals for the Institute’s staff publications, their impact factors and the Supreme Attestation Commission’s and international analytic databases inclusion are specified. The rating of TatNIPIneft researchers by the number of publications is given.
21
Alim, Nur, Titin Retnawati, and Syamsuddin Syamsuddin. "Peranan Media Sosial Facebook Dalam Manajemen Publikasi Informasi Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan Iain Kendari." Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian 13, no. 2 (November 29, 2018): 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/ai.v13i2.955.
Full textAbstract:
This study discusses the role of social media in the management of information publications Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kendari. The results of the study showed that the management of information publication at the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kendari was divided into four stages. First, the planning stage, which includes analysis of information to be published, namely academic, student or general information, related parties involved in the publication, namely the leadership of the Tarbiyah Faculty and administrative staff. As well as media publications to be used, namely Facebook social media and print media. Second, the organizing stage, namely the administration of the Tarbiyah Faculty has five administrative staff in charge of organizing information publications. Third, the implementation stage, this information publication was carried out by administrative staff as well as the head of the Tarbiyah Faculty administration section through the use of print media and Facebook. The last stage is supervision, where faculty leaders are involved in supervising the publication of that information. The role of Facebook in the management of information publications at the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kendari consists of three roles, namely information optimization, ease of publication and access to information, and has interesting features in information publication
22
Bain, C. R., and P. S. Myles. "Relationship between Journal Impact Factor and Levels of Evidence in Anaesthesia." Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 33, no. 5 (October 2005): 567–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0503300503.
Full textAbstract:
Evidence-based medicine uses a hierarchy of publication types according to their vulnerability to bias. A widely used measure of journal “quality” is its impact factor, which describes the citation rate of its publications. We investigated the relationship between impact factor for eight anaesthesia journals and publication type with respect to their level of evidence 1-4 using Spearman rank correlation (rho). There were 1418 original publications during 2001 included in the analysis. The number (%) of publication types according to evidence-based medicine level were: level 1: 6 (0.4%), level 2: 533 (38%) level 3: 329 (23%), level 4: 550 (39%). There was no correlation between journal ranking according to impact factor and publication type (rho=–0.03, P=0.25). The correlation between journal rank and the proportion of publications that were randomized trials was –0.35 (P<0.001). The correlation between journal rank and number of publications was 0.65 (P<0.001). The correlation between journal rank and number of level 1 or 2 studies was 0.58 (P<0.001). The overall level of evidence published in anaesthesia journals was high. Journal rank according to impact factor is related to the number of publications, but not the proportion of publications that are evidence-based medicine level 1 or 2.
23
Forrester, MB. "Bibliometric analysis of poison center-related research published in peer-review journals." Human & Experimental Toxicology 35, no. 7 (August 3, 2015): 705–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327115598386.
Full textAbstract:
Poison centers advance knowledge in the field of toxicology through publication in peer-review journals. This investigation describes the pattern of poison center-related publications. Cases were poison center-related research published in peer-review journals during 1995–2014. These were identified through searching the PubMed database, reviewing the tables of contents of selected toxicology journals, and reviewing abstracts of various national and international meetings. The following variables for each publication were identified: year of publication, journal, type of publication (meeting abstract vs. other, i.e. full article or letter to the editor), and the country(ies) of the poison center(s) included in the research. Of the 3147 total publications, 62.1% were meeting abstracts. There were 263 publications in 1995–1999, 536 in 2000–2004, 999 in 2005–2009, and 1349 in 2010–2014. The publications were in 234 different journals. The journals in which the highest number of research was published were Clinical Toxicology (69.7%), Journal of Medical Toxicology (2.2%), and Veterinary and Human Toxicology (2.1%). The research was reported from 62 different countries. The countries with the highest number of publications were the United States (67.9%), United Kingdom (6.5%), Germany (3.9%), France (2.5%), and Italy (2.4%). The number of publications increased greatly over the 20 years. Although the publications were in a large number of journals, a high proportion of the publications were in one journal. While the research came from a large number of countries, the preponderance came from the United States.
24
Kun, Ádám. "Time to Acceptance of 3 Days for Papers About COVID-19." Publications 8, no. 2 (June 3, 2020): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications8020030.
Full textAbstract:
Time to acceptance from submission and time to publication (publication lag) determines how quickly novel information is made available to other scientists and experts. In the medical field, the review process and revisions usually takes 3–4 months; the total time from submission to publication is 8–9 months. During the COVID-19 pandemic, information should be available much faster. The analysis of 833 documents published on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 prior to 19 March 2020 shows that these times shrunk by a factor of ten. The median time to acceptance was three days for all publications, six days for research papers and reviews, four days for case studies and two days for other publication types. The median publication lag was nine days for all publications together, 11 days for research papers, nine days for case studies, 13 days for reviews and seven days for other publications. This demonstrates that the publication process—if necessary—can be sped up. For the sake of scientific accuracy, review times should not be pushed down, but the time from acceptance to actual publication could be shorter.
25
Rahardja, Untung, Ninda Lutfiani, and Hega Lutfilah Juniar. "Scientific Publication Management Transformation In Disruption Era." Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM) 3, no. 2 (July 26, 2019): 109–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.33050/atm.v3i2.1008.
Full textAbstract:
New innovations enter the market and create a strong disruption effect, a sign that the era of the decade that is currently happening has experienced many changes in various sectors, including economics, technology, education and politics. This study aims to examine the aspects and direction of the development of research related to the Disruption Age that affects technological developments, one of which is in the field of publication management. The approach used is a study of various definitions and model frameworks that developed around the era of disruption and management of publications as well as mapping and analysis of a number of publications. Judging from the research method, most of the research was carried out through descriptive and conceptual methods in which technological aspects became the focus of research by researchers. Disruption innovation has an impact on publication management, where publication management is increasingly developing with additional technological spices. Management of online-based scientific publications or e-journals that are able to manage scientific publication activities to create better management and publications and improve accessibility. The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education targets 7,000 nationally accredited journals with six ratings. In 2018 there were 20,610 internationally published scientific works in Indonesia. The application of this online-based or e-journal scientific publication management system is able to improve the quality of the process of managing scientific journals to be more systematic and organized to achieve efficiency and improve publications to be global.
Keywords: Disruption, Innovation, Scientific Publication Management, Technology.
26
Carey, Luke C., Serina Stretton, Charlotte A. Kenreigh, Linda T. Wagner, and Karen L. Woolley. "High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices." PeerJ 4 (May 10, 2016): e2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2011.
Full textAbstract:
Background.The need for timely, ethical, and high-quality reporting of clinical trial results has seen a rise in demand for publication professionals. These publication experts, who are not ghostwriters, work with leading medical researchers and funders around the world to plan and prepare thousands of publications each year. Despite the involvement of publication professionals in an increasing number of peer-reviewed publications, especially those that affect patient care, there is limited evidence-based guidance in the peer-reviewed literature on their publication practices. Similar to the push for editors and the peer-review community to conduct and publish research on publication ethics and the peer-review process, the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) has encouraged members to conduct and publish research on publication planning and practices. Our primary objective was to investigate the publication rate of research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings.Methods.ISMPP Annual Meeting abstract lists (April 2009–April 2014) were searched in November 2014 and data were extracted into a pilot-tested spreadsheet. MEDLINE was searched in December 2014 to determine the publication rate (calculated as the % of presented abstracts published as full papers in peer-reviewed journals). Data were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test (significance:P< .05) by an independent academic statistician.Results.From 2009 to 2014, there were 220 abstracts submitted, 185 accepted, and 164 presented. There were four corresponding publications (publication rate 2.4%). Over time, ISMPP’s abstract acceptance rate (overall: 84.1%) did not change, but the number of abstracts presented increased significantly (P= .02). Most abstracts were presented as posters (81.1%) and most research was observational (72.6%). Most researchers came from the US (78.0%), followed by Europe (17.7%), and the Asia-Pacific region (11.2%).Discussion.Research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings has rarely been published in peer-reviewed journals. The high rate of nonpublication by publication professionals has now been quantified and is of concern. Publication professionals should do more to contribute to evidence-based publication practices, including, and especially, their own. Unless the barriers to publication are identified and addressed, the practices of publication professionals, which affect thousands of peer-reviewed publications each year, will remain hidden and unproven.
27
Risal, S., and H. N. Prasad. "Some scientific publications of BPKIHS: a bibliometric study of articles listed in the Web of Science." Health Renaissance 10, no. 2 (July 30, 2012): 139–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6584.
Full textAbstract:
Scientific productivity of any academic institution is expressed by the total number of publications generated by its academic faculties and the use of the publication by scientific community. Citation analysis is done to evaluate the use of the publications. Use of the publication can be studied with the help of bibliometric analysis. Counting publication, publications trends, authorship patterns and citation analysis are parts of bibliometric analysis. Web of Science is one of the best databases which allow the study in the use of the publications through citation analysis. In this article, scientific articles produced by the faculties and other international affiliated faculties of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences have been studied. Citation analysis of scientific publications of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences is done with the help of the Web of Science, a product of Thomason Reuters.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6584 Health Renaissance 2012; Vol 10 (No.2); 139-143
28
Komala Putri, Ratna, Ernie Tisnawati Sule, Nury Effendi, and Hilmiana . "The Academic Climate and Organizational Support Influence on Performance of Lecturers Scientific Publications (Study at the Private University Accredited in West Java)." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 3.30 (August 24, 2018): 567. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18432.
Full textAbstract:
Objective - This article aims to produce a study of: Academic climate, organizational support and the performance of scientific publications of lecturers. Then examine the influence of academic climate and organizational support on the performance of lecturer scientific publications. Research on the performance of scientific publications is still very rare, let alone linking the issue to the academic climate and organizational support. So that research on this scientific publication should be done immediately so that scientific publications of lecturers in Indonesia can increase, especially the performance of scientific publications of lecturers at the private university in West Java.Method - The research design used in this research is mixed method Research (MMR). The analytical tool uses a Partial Lease Square.Findings - Scientific publications of lecturers will increase both in quantity and quality if conducive academic climate and organizational support activities. Academic climate and organizational support affect the performance of lecturer scientific publications, either partially or simultaneously. Simultaneously influence the academic climate and organizational support to Performance of Scientific Publication of Lecturers, amounted to 54,4%. While partially Academic climate and Organizational Support influential significantly to Performance of Scientific Publication of Lecturers, which is Academic climate has a greater influence (34,8%).
29
Bhasin, N., and DJA Scott. "Publication Outcome for Research Presented at the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland Annual Meetings." Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 89, no. 3 (April 2007): 292–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588407x155806.
Full textAbstract:
BACKGROUND The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland (VSGBI) annual meeting is a major international vascular surgery conference. Studies suggest that the percentage of presentations that result in full-text publications are a measure of the quality of the meeting. We investigated the publication outcome of abstracts presented to the VSGBI in 2001 and 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified abstracts from the conference programmes and conducted a detailed electronic Medline and PubMed search to determine publication. We collected data regarding the study design, subject matter, publishing journal, time to publication, institution of origin, impact factors and RAE levels. RESULTS There were 63 publications from 106 abstracts (59.4%), with a median impact factor of 3.507. Prospective observational studies accounted for 20.6% of publications, with abdominal aortic aneurysms being the commonest subject matter (34.9%). The median time to publication was 12 months, with the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery publishing 33.3% of the articles. Leicester achieved the highest number of publications and the majority of work came from centres with Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) level scores of 4, university centres accounted for 74.6% of publications. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that when compared to equivalent meetings in other specialties and geographical regions, the annual meeting of the VSGBI is of the very highest quality.
30
Mokhnacheva, Y. V. "Russian-Armenian scientific cooperation from the viewpoint of joint publication activity (on DBs «Web of Science Core Collection», «Scopus», Russian Science Citation Index for 2005-2014)." Bibliosphere, no. 3 (September 30, 2016): 53–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2016-3-53-59.
Full textAbstract:
The Commonwealth of Independent States creation in 1991 was a new reality for cooperation and development of post-Soviet states. Russia and Armenia have long close and stable relations in the scientific-educational sphere. The article objective is to evaluate the joint Russian-Armenian documentary flow in various scientific fields for ten years (2005-2014). As the research information base three main resources were studied that allow analyzing the co-publication activity: «Web of Science Core Collection» (Thomson Reuters); Scopus (Elsevier); RISC (OLC «Scientific Electronic Library»). Research articles and reviews were considered. The Russian-Armenian documentary flow dynamics was studied with the differentiation by arrays: publications, whose authors are both the Russian and Armenian scientists; publication created with and without participation in major international collaborations; publications involving authors of third countries; publication without the participation of third countries authors. Evaluation indicators of the joint Russian-Armenian publication activity were: the publications number dynamics; average citation; frequency distribution of publications on periodicals; frequency distribution of joint publications on areas of knowledge. The study reveals growing the number of publications, whose authors are Russian and Armenian scientists working in large international collaborations (ATLAS, CMS Collaboration, ALICE Collaboration, etc.) recent years. Such publications citation is quite high: the level of citation exceeds the world average parameters two-seven times for these years. The level of the cited publication carried on without international collaborations is 62-155% of the world average indicators. The documentary flow out of collaborations, but with the participation of third countries authors has a varied dynamic with an average growth rate about 1% (WoS) to 2% (Scopus). The main co-author states as «third» countries are: Germany, Italy, the USA and the UK. Main cooperation between Russia and Armenia takes place in physics and astronomy (about 1/2 of joint publications); chemistry (8%) and biology (6%) and material science (6%). Sciences spectrum of joint research is represented by 23 branches of knowledge. The study results showed a high level of the Russian-Armenian scientific ties with good development potential.
31
Mokhnacheva, Yulia V. "On physico-chemical biology in Russia from the perspective of studying the dynamics of an array of publications." Science management: theory and practice 2, no. 3 (2020): 113–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.7.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents an analysis of the current state of the Russian segment of publications on physical and chemical biology (PCB) in the international database Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) for the period 2000–2019. The main task of the study is to analyze the dynamics of changes in the arrays of Russian publications in the field of physical and chemical biology, including determining the average citation rate of publications; analysis of the impact of international cooperation on publication activity; identification of leaders at the level of research institutions and individual specialists. The study is based on a bibliometric analysis of publication arrays presented in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) database for the period 2000–2019. It is shown that after a period of decline in publication activity, starting in 2015, previously lost positions in the share of publications in the world array were restored in Russia. However, the citation of Russian publications lags significantly behind the performance of the of the main competitor countries. It is shown that Russian publications without foreign participation are cited 3–4 times less often than workswith foreign co-authorship. Throughout the entire study period, there was an increase in the number of co-authors in publications, as well as the share of publications made with the participation of five or more co-authors: by 2019, such publications accounted for almost 64%, in 2000 there were about 40% of such publications. It is shown that the main contribution to the Russian documentary stream on physical and chemical biology is made by the research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RI RAS) – 68% of publications and 67% of all citations. Research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences have a significant impact on the publication activity of universities: in the period 2012–2019. The share of joint publications of universities and research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences was 55% of the array of university documents and 62% of all citations to university publications. The article presents the ratings of Russian scientific organizations by the share of publications in the Russian array in the field of physicochemical biology, as well as scientists by the largest number of publications and the highest average citation.
32
Reilly, Samantha M., Tianrong Cheng, and Jenna DuMond. "Method Validation Approaches for Analysis of Constituents in ENDS." Tobacco Regulatory Science 6, no. 4 (July 1, 2020): 242–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.18001/trs.6.4.3.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: We assessed how many peer-reviewed publications reporting chemical quantities and/or yields from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have included adequate method validation characteristics in the publication for appropriate interpretation of data quality for informing tobacco regulatory science. Methods: We searched 5 databases (Web of Knowledge, PubMed, SciFinder, Embase, EBSCOhost) for ENDS publications between January 2007 and September 2018. Of the 283 publications screened, 173 publications were relevant for analysis. We identified the publications that report a certain degree of control in data quality, ie, the publications that report marginally validated methods (MVMs). MVMs refer to the methods that: (1) report 3 or more International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) method validation characteristics, (2) state the method was validated, (3) cite their own previous publication(s) that report MVMs, or (4) use a method within the accreditation scope of an accredited laboratory. Results: Overall, 97 publications (56%) report MVMs in their studies. This percentage also reflects the publication distribution for the majority of the 28 chemicals measured by MVMs. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for reporting sufficient validation characteristics following appropriate guidance to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the published analytical data for proper data interpretations that may support policy.
33
Lin, Wei-Chao, Chih-Fong Tsai, and Shih-Wen Ke. "Correlation analysis for comparison of the citation impact of journals, magazines, and conferences in computer science." Online Information Review 39, no. 3 (June 8, 2015): 310–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2014-0273.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – In many research areas, there are a variety of different types of academic publications, including journals, magazines and conferences, which provide outlets for researchers to present their findings. Generally speaking, although there are differences in the reviewing criteria and publication processes of different publication types, in the same research area, there is certainly overlap in terms of the problems addressed and the audience for different publication types. Therefore, the research impacts of different publication types in the same research area should be moderately or highly correlated. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – To prove this hypothesis, the authors examine the correlation coefficient of citation impacts for different types of publications, in seven research areas of computer science, from 2000 to 2013. In particular, four related citation statistics are examined for each publication type, which are average citations per paper, average citations per year, average annual increase in individual h-index, and h-index. Findings – The analysis results show only a partial correlation in terms of several specific citation measures for different publication types in the same research area. Moreover, the level of correlation of the citation impact between different publication types is different, depending on the research area. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to investigate whether the research impact of different types of publications in the same area is correlated. The findings can help guide researchers and academics choose the most appropriate publication outlets.
34
Sereda, A. P., and M. A. Andrianova. "Analysis of Publications of the Russian Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeons in Foreign Top-Rated Journals." Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 24, no. 4 (December 29, 2018): 9–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-4-9-19.
Full textAbstract:
The present paper is dedicated to the publications analysis by Russian authors in top-rated foreign journals. The aim of the research to define the avant-garde status of the national trauma and orthopaedics science. The authors of the present paper analyzed the publications in the first thirty journals under the heading «Orthopaedics and sports medicine» from Scimago Journal & Country Rank rating. The search was conducted from the moment of the first issue of each journal. Total number of publications was calculated, total number of publications from each author, number of publications per institution, citations of each publication in PubMed Central и Google Scholar. The subject, chronologic characteristics and relation of the year of publication with number of citations were analyzed.
35
Kim, You Sun, and Dong Soo Han. "Analysis of consultations by the Committee for Publication Ethics of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors." Science Editing 7, no. 2 (August 20, 2020): 184–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.215.
Full textAbstract:
This study aimed to analyze the inquiries on research and publication ethics submitted to the Committee for Publication Ethics of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. A total of 80 inquiries were initiated over the course of 3 years, from April 2017 to March 2020. Based on a categorization of these inquiries, four common topics are discussed in detail. We present specific cases derived from actual situations, and the steps taken in processing these inquiries. The number of inquiries by topic was as follows: duplicate publications (12), secondary publications (11), authorship disputes (11), informed consent (6), proceedings (5), copyright (5), institutional review board approval (5), plagiarism (4), corrections (4), and others (17). Cases of duplicate publication and authorship disputes can be treated according to the flow chart of the Committee on Publication Ethics of the United Kingdom. Secondary publications may be permitted if the readers or audiences are different and both journals’ editors grant permission. Editors should be cautious about publishing cases without informed consent, even in the absence of identifiable photos, because patients or their families may be able to identify the cases. An adequate awareness of ethical considerations relevant to publication can help reduce the number of instances of research and publication ethics misconduct.
36
Myles, Paul S., and Nicole Tan. "Reporting of Ethical Approval and Informed Consent in Clinical Research Published in Leading Anesthesia Journals." Anesthesiology 99, no. 5 (November 1, 2003): 1209–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200311000-00030.
Full textAbstract:
Background Ethical conduct in human research in anesthesia includes approval by an institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee and informed consent. Evidence of these is sometimes lacking in journal publications. Methods The authors reviewed all publications involving human subjects in six leading anesthesia journals for the year 2001 (n = 1189). Rates of IRB approval and informed consent were examined and compared with potential predictors that included journal, type of publication, and patient demographics (age, sex, elective or emergency status). Rates were compared by use of chi-square and logistic regression. Results The authors found that IRB approval was documented in 71% of publications and consent was obtained in 66% of publications. Significant variation in IRB approval and consent was found among journals (P < 0.0005) and according to type of publication (P < 0.0005). Because publication type affected rates of IRB approval and consent (trials > mechanistic studies > observational studies > case reports), an analysis restricted to prospective studies also found a significant difference in IRB approval and consent among journals (P < 0.0005). Conclusions This study suggests that rates of IRB approval and informed consent vary among publications in anesthesia journals. Clearer guidelines (and author adherence) for all types of publication are needed, both as a protection for research subjects and to maintain public trust in the process.
37
Evdokimov, V. I., and V. F. Glukhov. "Integrated score of publication performance of leading organizations of EMERCOM of Russia (2005–2019)." Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations, no. 2 (June 17, 2020): 109–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2020-0-2-109-119.
Full textAbstract:
Relevance. To improve the quality of publications while maintaining their growth rate, employees of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia have approved a methodology for assessing the integrated score of publication performance of organizations.Intention. Analysis of the integrated score of publication performance of the leading educational and scientific organizations of the Russian Emergencies Ministry for 10 years (2010–2019).Methodology. The object of the study was the annual indicators of the integrated score of publication performance of the Russian Emercom as calculated by the staff of the Scientific Electronic Library [https://www.elibrary.ru/].Results and Discussion. A low average annual integrated score of publication performance was revealed in the Emercom of Russia. For an educational organization in the Russian Emercom, it amounted to (55.67 ±5.8) points, for a research organization – (29.0 ± 1.5) points (p < 0.01). The average annual integrated score of publication performance for the same period at Omsk State Technical University turned out to be 6 times higher (306.4 ± 19.0) than the average for educational institutions of the Russian EMERCOM (p < 0.001). It turned out that the EMERCOM of Russia had few highly rated publications on computer and information sciences, physical and chemical branches of knowledge, and quite a lot of publications on social sciences. Most likely, the latter are not a priority in the state assignment for research and development of the EMERCOM of Russia. Shown are the ways to increase the integrated score of publication performance of the EMERCOM of Russia organizations.Conclusion. The slogan of researchers “print or die” in modern conditions is becoming less and less relevant. Russian and world science were flooded with insignificant and sometimes false publications. The fractional calculation of the integrated score of publication performance will make the authors think before including anyone in gift co-authorship or creating “fake” affiliations. This methodology will help improve the quality of domestic publications, and printing weak articles will become irrelevant.
38
Nemtsov, A. V., E. A. Kuznetsova-Moreva, and V. V. Shein. "Zero Citation in Russian Medical Science, 1990–2017." Economics of Science 6, no. 3 (October 15, 2020): 199–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2020-6-3-199-208.
Full textAbstract:
A scientometric study of 51 research institutes of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation was carried out. 139,342 publications registered in the Russian Science Citation Index in 1950-2017, were the material of the study. We studied the distribution of publications by year of publication and the number of citations. The publications were divided into two groups: 1) cited one or more times (n = 65395 or 46.9%) and 2) with zero citation (n = 73946 or 53.1%). In 2001-2016 the total number of publications increases linearly (regression coefficient 721 publications or 10% per year). At the same time, the share of cited publications decreased from 72% in 2001 to 46% in 2014, and later, to 4% in 2017. During the period of the highest publication activity (2000-2013), the proportion of cited publications ranged from 17 % to 81% in different institutions (median 61%). The proportion of cited publications may be an indicator of the effectiveness of institutions.
39
Hilbert, Fee, Julia Barth, Julia Gremm, Daniel Gros, Jessica Haiter, Maria Henkel, Wilhelm Reinhardt, and Wolfgang G. Stock. "Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media." Online Information Review 39, no. 2 (April 13, 2015): 255–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-07-2014-0159.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how the coverage of publications is represented in information services. Academic citation databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar) and scientific social media (Mendeley, CiteULike, BibSonomy) were analyzed by applying a new method: the use of personal publication lists of scientists. Design/methodology/approach – Personal publication lists of scientists of the field of information science were analyzed. All data were taken in collaboration with the scientists in order to guarantee complete publication lists. Findings – The demonstrated calibration parameter shows the coverage of information services in the field of information science. None of the investigated databases reached a coverage of 100 percent. However Google Scholar covers a greater amount of publications than other academic citation databases and scientific social media. Research limitations/implications – Results were limited to the publications of scientists working at an information science department from 2003 to 2012 at German-speaking universities. Practical implications – Scientists of the field of information science are encouraged to review their publication strategy in case of quality and quantity. Originality/value – The paper confirms the usefulness of personal publication lists as a calibration parameter for measuring coverage of information services.
40
Mutsaers, Adam, Sangyang Jia, Andrew Warner, Timothy K. Nguyen, Joanna M. Laba, and David A. Palma. "Research Productivity of Canadian Radiation Oncology Residents: A Time-Trend Analysis." Current Oncology 28, no. 1 (November 30, 2020): 4–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010003.
Full textAbstract:
(1) Background: Research productivity is a mandatory component of Canadian radiation oncology (RO) resident training. To our knowledge, Canadian RO resident research publication productivity has not previously been analysed. (2) Methods: We compiled a 12-year database of RO residents in Canadian training programs who completed residency between June 2005 and June 2016. Resident names and dates of training were abstracted from provincial databases and department websites and were used to abstract data from PubMed, including training program, publication year, journal, type of research, topic and authorship position. Residents were divided into four time periods and the linear trend test evaluated publication rates over time. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify authorship predictors. (3) Results: 227 RO residents representing 363 publications were identified. The majority were first-author publications (56%) and original research (77%). Overall, 82% of first-author, and 80% of any-author articles were published in resident year 4 or higher. Mean number of publications for first-author and any-author positions increased significantly over time (p = 0.016 and p = 0.039, respectively). After adjusting for gender and time period, large institutions (> 3 residents per year) trended toward associations with more first-author publications (odds ratio (OR): 2.44; p = 0.066) and more any-author publications (OR: 2.49; p = 0.052). No significant differences were observed by gender. (4) Conclusions: Canadian RO resident publication productivity nearly doubled over a 12-year period. The majority of publications are released in the last 2 years of residency, and larger residency programs may be associated with more publications. These findings serve as a baseline as programs transition to Competency Based Medical Education (CBME).
41
Hart, Richard L. "Scholarly Publication by University Librarians: A Study at Penn State." College & Research Libraries 60, no. 5 (September 1, 1999): 454–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.5.454.
Full textAbstract:
The amount of scholarly publication that is required of academic librarians is thought to vary among different types of colleges and universities. The present study looks in detail at the aggregated publishing record of the librarians at Penn State University, an institution that requires publication as a condition of continued employment. Findings indicate that Penn State librarians are quite productive in terms of the number of publications they contribute to the literature, and they are strongly committed to research. Evidence suggests that increasing demands for publication have served to influence both the quantity and the quality of librarians’ publications in recent years.
42
Singh, Keerti, Md Anwarul Azim Majumder, Subir Gupta, Uma Gaur, Bidyadhar Sa, and Oswald P. Adams. "Disparity in biomedical publication trends in the CARICOM countries: Is there a need for a more vibrant research culture in the region?" SAGE Open Medicine 8 (January 2020): 205031212095328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312120953285.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Biomedical research and publications provide evidence-based information about the extent and burden of health-related problems of a country and help to formulate strategic and operational plans to tackle the problems. Purpose: To determine the biomedical publication rates of CARICOM full member countries. Methods: Biomedical publications of full member CARICOM countries were retrieved using PubMed (1990–2015) and SCImago Journal & Country Rank (1996–2015) databases. CARICOM countries having >50 publications in the PubMed (1990–2015) database were subject to further analysis, whereby publications of each country were adjusted by total population (million population), gross domestic product (billion-dollar), and Internet usage rate (hundred thousand population). Results: Total publications by all countries were 7281 and 8378 in PubMed and SCImago Journal & Country Rank, respectively. Jamaica produced highest number of publications (PubMed: 3928 (53.9%); SCImago Journal & Country Rank: 2850 (34.0%)). In both databases, Grenada had the highest research publications when adjusted with per million population (4721 and 10,633), per billion gross domestic product (803 and 1651), and per hundred thousand Internet users (1487 and 3387). Trend analysis revealed Jamaica produced the highest number of additional PubMed listed publications each year, averaging 4.8/year, followed by Trinidad and Tobago (4.4). According to SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Jamaica also had the highest number of citations (42,311) and h-index (76), followed by Trinidad and Tobago (29,152 and 71). Barbados had the highest number of citations per document (24.9), followed by Haiti (18.4). The publication rates determined by PubMed and SCImago Journal & Country Rank databases were significantly correlated (p < 0.001). Most publications (68% SCImago Journal & Country Rank and 85% PubMed) can be attributed to authors affiliated with Barbados, Jamaica, and Trinidad. Conclusion: Publication and citation rates varied markedly between CARICOM countries and were in general low. Most publications could be attributed to researchers affiliated with The University of the West Indies. More universities valuing biomedical research are needed in the region, and more resources needed to improve publication rates.
43
Cobey, Kelly D., James Galipeau, Larissa Shamseer, and David Moher. "Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment." PeerJ 5 (May 31, 2017): e3294. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3294.
Full textAbstract:
Background The scholarly publication landscape is changing rapidly. We investigated whether the introduction of an institutional publications officer might help facilitate better knowledge of publication topics and related resources, and effectively support researchers to publish. Methods In September 2015, a purpose-built survey about researchers’ knowledge and perceptions of publication practices was administered at five Ottawa area research institutions. Subsequently, we publicly announced a newly hired publications officer (KDC) who then began conducting outreach at two of the institutions. Specifically, the publications officer gave presentations, held one-to-one consultations, developed electronic newsletter content, and generated and maintained a webpage of resources. In March 2016, we re-surveyed our participants regarding their knowledge and perceptions of publishing. Mean scores to the perception questions, and the percent of correct responses to the knowledge questions, pre and post survey, were computed for each item. The difference between these means or calculated percentages was then examined across the survey measures. Results 82 participants completed both surveys. Of this group, 29 indicated that they had exposure to the publications officer, while the remaining 53 indicated they did not. Interaction with the publications officer led to improvements in half of the knowledge items (7/14 variables). While improvements in knowledge of publishing were also found among those who reported not to have interacted with the publications officer (9/14), these effects were often smaller in magnitude. Scores for some publication knowledge variables actually decreased between the pre and post survey (3/14). Effects for researchers’ perceptions of publishing increased for 5/6 variables in the group that interacted with the publications officer. Discussion This pilot provides initial indication that, in a short timeframe, introducing an institutional publications officer may improve knowledge and perceptions surrounding publishing. This study is limited by its modest sample size and temporal relationship between the introduction of the publications officer and changes in knowledge and perceptions. A randomized trial examining the publications officer as an effective intervention is needed.
44
Chaffee, Benjamin W., and Ashley Cheng. "Global Research Trends on Early-Life Feeding Practices and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review." Journal of Oral Diseases 2014 (May 19, 2014): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/675658.
Full textAbstract:
Objective. To describe the epidemiologic literature related to early-life feeding practices and early childhood caries (ECC) with regard to publication attributes and trends in these attributes over time. Methods. Systematic literature review including electronic and manual searches (in BIOSIS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and WHOLIS), covering the years 1990–2013. Attributes of publications meeting a priori inclusion criteria were abstracted and organized by global region and trends over time. Attributes included country of origin and study design of included publications and age and caries prevalence of the populations studied. Results. 244 publications drawn from 196 independent study populations were included. The number of publications and the countries represented increased over time, although some world regions remained underrepresented. Most publications were cross-sectional (75%); while this percentage remained fairly constant over time, the percentage of studies to account for confounding factors increased. Publications varied with respect to the caries experience and age range of children included in each study. Conclusions. Publication productivity regarding feeding practices and ECC research has grown, but this growth has not been evenly distributed globally. Individual publication attributes (i.e., methods and context) can differ significantly and should be considered when interpreting and synthesizing the literature.
45
Bulatova, E. K. "Corporate book publications in the corporate culture system." Bibliosphere, no. 4 (December 30, 2018): 32–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2018-4-32-37.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of corporate publications in the corporate culture system. A corporate publication is a new type of edition, which started to develop actively in Russia in the 1990s. To date, it is a complex of different types of publications: books, periodicals, small-print products, as well as websites, mobile applications, etc. as a variety form of corporate publications that perform similar functions. The study objective is to identify functions of book corporate publications, their place in the corporate culture system. The research methodology consists of a combination of a functional-typological method, a comparative-typological technique, and content analysis. The author identifies a range of problems facing the corporate publication study: absence of the «corporate publication» notion in the categorical-conceptual apparatus of bibliology; lack of statistical accounting; need to identify the essential characteristics of corporate publications, which include their functional purpose. The book edition performs specific functions, the main of which is forming the image and corporate culture. The corporate edition is a reflection of the visual and verbal brand system, a channel of communication and corporate advertising.
46
I Narayan, Aparna, Bharti Chogtu, Manthan Janodia, and Santhosh Krishnan Venkata. "A bibliometric study on the research outcome of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa." F1000Research 10 (March 16, 2021): 213. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51337.1.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Publication is one of the quantitative measures of countries' contribution to research and innovation. This paper attempts to understand the publication related information of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). Methods: Detailed analysis of publications on the basis of collaboration, research area, number of publications, percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) spent on research, and citation is presented in the paper. An attempt is also made to understand the relations between each of the parameters and the overall performance of the country. Results: Times Higher Education global ranking is considered as a measure to validate the claims of this paper. This study shows that among the BRICS nations, China with the highest percentage of GDP spent on research has also the highest number of researchers and publication output whereas South Africa excels in terms of number of international collaborative publications and publications in high impact journals. This article has highlighted the distribution of publications as per the subject area with India leading in the area of Computer Science. Discussion: Results showed a strong relationship between each of the parameters discussed on the research performance of a country.
47
Tupan, Tupan, and Kamaludin Kamaludin. "PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT IN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL ANALYSIS BASED ON SCOPUS DATA." BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI 41, no. 2 (December 11, 2020): 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v41i2.701.
Full textAbstract:
The study aims to determine: (1) the number of open access resources for research data management publications indexed by Scopus, including the year of publication, source of publication, authors, institutions, countries, types of documents and funding agencies; (2) mapping research data management based on keywords. The results of the study showed that the number of open access resources for research data management publications has started since 1981 and the number has continued to increase starting in 2014 and the highest number occurred in 2019, namely 49 publications. The most publicized journals that open access to research data management was the Data Science Journal, which was 11 publications. The most productive author of conducting research data management publications was Cox, A.M. and Pinfield, S. The largest institutions contributing to the publication of open access research data management were the University of Toronto and New York University. The countries that contributed the most were the United States with 50 publications, then China with 38 publications. The most open access research data management in the form of articles as many as 107 and 37 conference paper publications. The institutions that provided the most funding sponsors were the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the National Science Foundation. The results of keyword mapping with VOSViewer showed that big data, research data management, information management, data management, medical research topics, software, information processing, and metadata were the most researched topics.
48
Ansor, Shokibul. "Study Meta Analysis of Strategies and Utilization of Electronic Journals ( e - journals ) For Graduate Student University of Malang in Efforts Produce Internationally Reputed Scientific Publications." Record and Library Journal 3, no. 1 (January 9, 2018): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v3-i1.2017.63-73.
Full textAbstract:
Scientific publications in journals of international repute acts as a medium for self-actualization academics in the development of science internationally . Higher education institutions that have the quality of education , science and technology are good tend to have a high number of international publications . To produce scientific publications of high quality , must be supported by research and a source of reference quality . In an effort to improve the scientific publication of national repute academic environment . Malang State University. providing electronic information resources in the form of an electronic journal that comes from a variety of electronic information resources , in the hope utilized by students in an effort to increase scientific publication of international repute . The effort is also supported by a set of rules that requires that academic graduate students have a scientific publication of international repute as a graduation requirement
49
Matosas-López, Luis, and Alberto Romero-Ania. "The Efficiency of Social Network Services Management in Organizations. An In-Depth Analysis Applying Machine Learning Algorithms and Multiple Linear Regressions." Applied Sciences 10, no. 15 (July 27, 2020): 5167. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10155167.
Full textAbstract:
The objective of this work is to detect the variables that allow organizations to manage their social network services efficiently. The study, applying machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regressions, reveals which aspects of published content increase the recognition of publications through retweets and favorites. The authors examine (I) the characteristics of the content (publication volumes, publication components, and publication moments) and (II) the message of the content (publication topics). The research considers 21,771 publications and thirty-nine variables. The results show that the recognition obtained through retweets and favorites is conditioned both by the characteristics of the content and by the message of the content. The recognition through retweets improves when the organization uses links, hashtags, and topics related to gender equality, whereas the recognition through favorites increases when the organization uses original tweets, publications between 8:00 and 10:00 a.m. and, again, gender equality related topics. The findings of this research provide new knowledge about trends and patterns of use in social media, providing academics and professionals with the necessary guidelines to efficiently manage these technologies in the organizational field.
50
Riley, William T., Katrina Bibb, Sara Hargrave, and Paula Fearon. "Publication rates from biomedical and behavioral and social science R01s funded by the National Institutes of Health." PLOS ONE 15, no. 11 (November 13, 2020): e0242271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242271.
Full textAbstract:
Prior research has shown a serious lack of research transparency resulting from the failure to publish study results in a timely manner. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has increased its use of publication rate and time to publication as metrics for grant productivity. In this study, we analyze the publications associated with all R01 and U01 grants funded from 2008 through 2014, providing sufficient time for these grants to publish their findings, and identify predictors of time to publication based on a number of variables, including if a grant was coded as a behavioral and social sciences research (BSSR) grant or not. Overall, 2.4% of the 27,016 R01 and U01 grants did not have a publication associated with the grant within 60 months of the project start date, and this rate of zero publications was higher for BSSR grants (4.6%) than for non-BSSR grants (1.9%). Mean time in months to first publication was 15.2 months, longer for BSSR grants (22.4 months) than non-BSSR grants (13.6 months). Survival curves showed a more rapid reduction of risk to publish from non-BSSR vs BSSR grants. Cox regression models showed that human research (vs. animal, neither, or both) and clinical trials research (vs. not) are the strongest predictors of time to publication and failure to publish, but even after accounting for these and other predictors, BSSR grants continued to show longer times to first publication and greater risk of no publications than non-BSSR grants. These findings indicate that even with liberal criteria for publication (any publication associated with a grant), a small percentage of R01 and U01 grantees fail to publish in a timely manner, and that a number of factors, including human research, clinical trial research, child research, not being an early stage investigator, and conducting behavioral and social sciences research increase the risk of time to first publication.