Academic literature on the topic 'Purdue Pegboard'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Purdue Pegboard.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Purdue Pegboard"
Lawson, Ian. "Purdue Pegboard Test." Occupational Medicine 69, no. 5 (July 2019): 376–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqz044.
Full textReddon, John R., David M. Gill, Stephen E. Gauk, and Marita D. Maerz. "Purdue Pegboard: Test-Retest Estimates." Perceptual and Motor Skills 66, no. 2 (April 1988): 503–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.503.
Full textStrenge, Hans, Uwe Niederberger, and Ulrike Seelhorst. "Correlation between Tests of Attention and Performance on Grooved and Purdue Pegboards in Normal Subjects." Perceptual and Motor Skills 95, no. 2 (October 2002): 507–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.507.
Full textRaats, Joke, Ilse Lamers, Ilse Baert, Barbara Willekens, Renee Veldkamp, and Peter Feys. "Cognitive-motor interference in persons with multiple sclerosis during five upper limb motor tasks with different complexity." Multiple Sclerosis Journal 25, no. 13 (November 12, 2018): 1736–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458518808194.
Full textBuddenberg, L. A., and C. Davis. "Test-Retest Reliability of the Purdue Pegboard Test." American Journal of Occupational Therapy 54, no. 5 (September 1, 2000): 555–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.5.555.
Full textIrie, Keisuke, Hirokatsu Iseki, Satomi Okamoto, Seiji Nishimura, Akio Kobe, and Kenji Kagechika. "Validity and responsiveness of the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function." Hand Therapy 22, no. 4 (July 2, 2017): 133–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758998317719095.
Full textVerdino, Michele, and Sherry Dingman. "Two Measures of Laterality in Handedness: The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and the Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity." Perceptual and Motor Skills 86, no. 2 (April 1998): 476–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.2.476.
Full textChambliss, Catherine, Karen Tyson, and Joseph Tracy. "Performance on the Purdue Pegboard and Finger Tapping by Schizophrenics after Mellow and Frenetic Antecedent Music." Perceptual and Motor Skills 83, no. 3_suppl (December 1996): 1161–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.83.3f.1161.
Full textShin, Sohee, Shinichi Demura, and Hiroki Aoki. "Effects of Prior Use of Chopsticks on Two Different Types of Dexterity Tests: Moving Beans Test and Purdue Pegboard." Perceptual and Motor Skills 108, no. 2 (April 2009): 392–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.108.2.392-398.
Full textChambliss, Catherine, Heidi McMichael, Karen Tyson, Catherine Monaco, and Joseph Tracy. "Motor Performance of Schizophrenics after Mellow and Frenetic Antecedent Music." Perceptual and Motor Skills 82, no. 1 (February 1996): 153–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.82.1.153.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Purdue Pegboard"
Sorcinelli, Aline Rodrigues. "Avaliação da habilidade motora manual em crianças de cinco e seis anos de duas escolas paulistanas." Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, 2008. http://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/handle/tede/1705.
Full textThe shortage of normative data in instruments and specific tests for the Brazilian population is a challenge to the professionals that intend to measure the effectiveness of its work. At the practical clinic, many diagnoses, preventions and treatments are established with the use of tests or measuring instruments. Instruments and tests that cover the motor developing aspects of manual coordination ability are even harder to find on the Brazilian children s norms and are important to notice the motor coordination issues that may affect their ability to take care of themselves, social activities and school performance. This study intended to find validation evidences of three manual motor ability tests, Purdue Pegboard, Finger Tapping and Simple Reaction Time in 134 right-handed children of 5 and 6 years old from two schools based in São Paulo, one of which is a private school and the other one is a public school with different socioeconomic levels. The specific objectives were intended to compare the performance of the manual motor ability tests between sexes and ages of 5 and 6 years olds, and to verify whether there was a performance difference in the tests between the children from the public and private school. The results showed a significant correlation between the three tests helping to validate the theory. Regarding the specified objectives, it was observed that between all the manual motor ability, only on the Purdue Pegboard 3 and 4 sub-tests did the girls perform better than the boys; the older children achieved a better performance on the tests; and the manual motor ability tests performance doesn t depend on which type of school the children attend.
A escassez de dados normativos em instrumentos e testes específicos para a população brasileira é um desafio aos profissionais que propõem mensurar a efetividade de seu trabalho. Na prática clínica, muitos diagnósticos, assim como prevenções e tratamentos podem ser estabelecidos com o uso de testes ou instrumentos de mensuração. Instrumentos e testes que abrangem aspectos do desenvolvimento motor como habilidade motora manual são ainda mais difíceis de estarem disponíveis nas normas para crianças brasileiras. Estes são importantes para a detecção de problemas de coordenação motora, que podem influenciar nas atividades de auto-cuidado, nas atividades sociais e no desempenho escolar. Este estudo propôs buscar evidências de validação de três testes de habilidade motora manual, Purdue Pegboard, Finger Tapping e Tempo de Reação Simples em 134 crianças de cinco e seis anos de idade. Todas destras, de duas escolas paulistanas, sendo uma escola particular e outra pública, com níveis sócioeconômicos distintos. Como objetivos específicos, a pesquisa propôs comparar o desempenho dos testes de habilidade motora manual entre os sexos, e entre as idades de cinco e seis anos. Além de verificar se existe diferenças no desempenho dos testes entre os sujeitos da escola pública e particular. Os resultados apontaram correlações significantes entre os três testes, o que auxiliou no processo de validade da construção. Em relação aos objetivos específicos observamos que entre todos os testes de habilidade motora manual, apenas nos sub-testes 3 e 4 do Purdue Pegboard, as meninas tiveram melhor desempenho que os meninos, os sujeitos com maior idade obtiveram melhor desempenho nos testes e o desempenho dos testes de habilidade motora manual independe do tipo de escola que o sujeito freqüenta.
Kaňková, Hana. "Objektivizace jemné motoriky u pacientů po traumatickém poškození mozku pomocí testu Purdue Pegboard." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-351435.
Full textHsieh, Yao, and 謝遙. "A Normative Study on the Purdue and Grooved Pegboard Tests for Normal Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years in North Taiwan." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/rtg2a6.
Full text國立臺灣大學
心理學研究所
107
Background: The Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test are important neuropsychological tools to evaluate manual dexterity, processing speed, and multiple cognitive abilities. However, a lack of data regarding the recent Taiwanese normative and psychometric property limits their clinical utility. Objective: This study aimed to establish the North Taiwan normative data of the Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test for normal adults aged ≥ 50 years. Psychometric properties and influences of demographical variables on the performance on the test were investigated. Method: The study recruited 242 normal adults aged ≥ 50 years in north Taiwan who were stratified by demographic variables. A subgroup of 30 participants selected additionally by stratified random sampling according to the demographic variables were administered the Digit Symbol-Coding subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scaled-Third Edition (Taiwan version) for criterion-related validity examination. A subgroup of 30 participants, who were selected by stratified random sampling according to the demographic variables, were retested with a testing interval of at least one month later for test-retest reliability examination. Besides, 27 patients with neurocognitive disorder due to type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol, and neurotoxin were collected retrospectively through medical record in National Taiwan University Hospital for investigating the clinical validity. Results: Age and gender effects rather than an education one were evident in performing the Purdue Pegboard Test. Furthermore, an age effect rather than gender and education effect was evident in performing the Grooved Pegboard Test. The results also showed adequate test-retest reliability, and criterion-related, construct, and clinical validity for the Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test. The normative data showed good representativeness, recency, and relevance. Conclusion: The Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test have adequate reliability and validity. Based on the significant evidence of demographic effects on test performance, the present study provides age and gender demographic-corrected Purdue pegboard normative data and a referential table for percentile ranks for research and clinical settings. The present study also provides age demographic-corrected Grooved pegboard normative data and a referential table for percentile ranks for research and clinical settings.
Book chapters on the topic "Purdue Pegboard"
Podell, Kenneth. "Purdue Pegboard." In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2900–2902. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_207.
Full textVentola, Pamela. "Purdue Pegboard." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2477–81. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_749.
Full textPodell, Kenneth. "Purdue Pegboard." In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2086–88. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_207.
Full textPodell, Kenneth. "Purdue Pegboard." In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1–3. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_207-2.
Full textVentola, Pamela E. "Purdue Pegboard." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3809–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91280-6_749.
Full textMcLellan, Tracey. "Purdue Pegboard Dexterity Test." In Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, 1202–3. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2322.
Full textBakhshipour, Elham, Reza Koiler, Kimberly Milla, and Nancy Getchell. "Understanding the Cognitive Demands of the Purdue Pegboard Test: An fNIRs Study." In Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering, 55–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_8.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Purdue Pegboard"
Tseng, Yu-Cheng, Kai-Yin Chang, Pin-Ling Liu, and Chien-Chi Chang. "Applying the purdue pegboard to evaluate precision assembly performance." In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ieem.2017.8290078.
Full text