Relevant bibliographies by topics / Purdue pegboard test

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Purdue pegboard test'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 15 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Purdue pegboard test.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Purdue pegboard test"

1

Lawson, Ian. "Purdue Pegboard Test." Occupational Medicine 69, no. 5 (2019): 376–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqz044.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Reddon, John R., David M. Gill, Stephen E. Gauk, and Marita D. Maerz. "Purdue Pegboard: Test-Retest Estimates." Perceptual and Motor Skills 66, no. 2 (1988): 503–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.503.

Full text
Abstract:
26 normal, self-reported dextral subjects (12 men, 14 women) were assessed with a Purdue Pegboard 5 times at weekly intervals to evaluate temporal stability and efficacy of lateralization with this test. There was a statistically significant increase in performance over time for men on the right- and left-hand placing subtests and for women on the assemblies subtest. For men/women the test-retest reliability over the 5 sessions averaged .63/.76 for the right-hand, .64/.79 for the left-hand, .67/.81 for both-hands, .81/.83 for assemblies, and .33/.22 for the right/left-hand ratio.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Buddenberg, L. A., and C. Davis. "Test-Retest Reliability of the Purdue Pegboard Test." American Journal of Occupational Therapy 54, no. 5 (2000): 555–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.5.555.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Strenge, Hans, Uwe Niederberger, and Ulrike Seelhorst. "Correlation between Tests of Attention and Performance on Grooved and Purdue Pegboards in Normal Subjects." Perceptual and Motor Skills 95, no. 2 (2002): 507–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.507.

Full text
Abstract:
This study investigated the relation between tests of manual dexterity and attentional functions with 49 normal, right-handed medical students (26 women, 23 men, ages 19–30 years) who were assessed with a Purdue Pegboard Test, Grooved Pegboard Test, and a Test for Attentional Performance, comprising measures of tonic and phasic alertness and divided attention. Weak to moderately high partial correlations controlling for finger size were obtained between pegboard test performance of the left hand and phasic alertness ( r = .31–.5O). Purdue Pegboard Assembly subtest scores were weakly correlated with divided attention ( r = −.39). These findings suggest that attention is an important determinant of performance for manual dexterity tests of the nondominant hand.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Raats, Joke, Ilse Lamers, Ilse Baert, Barbara Willekens, Renee Veldkamp, and Peter Feys. "Cognitive-motor interference in persons with multiple sclerosis during five upper limb motor tasks with different complexity." Multiple Sclerosis Journal 25, no. 13 (2018): 1736–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458518808194.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Cognitive-motor interference in multiple sclerosis has been well examined during walking, but not during upper limb (UL) performance. Objectives: To examine the dual-task cost (DTC) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and healthy controls (HC) in various type and complexity of UL motor tasks. Method: In total, 30 pwMS without major UL impairment and 30 HC performed five different UL tasks, in single condition and combined with the phonemic word list generation task. The percent change in performances was evaluated by the motor, cognitive, and combined DTC. The motor tasks consisted of four unimanual (sustained hand grip strength, box-and-block test, Purdue pegboard test, finger tapping task) and one bimanual task (Purdue pegboard test). Group and task differences were analyzed with unpaired and paired t-tests, respectively, and overall effect with a multivariate analysis of variance. Results: The motor DTC ranged between 10% (Purdue pegboard bimanual) and 35% (box-and-block test). The cognitive DTC ranged between −8% (finger tapping test) and +21% (bimanual Purdue pegboard). The magnitude of the combined DTC did not differ significantly between pwMS and HC in any task. Conclusion: DTC is influenced by the complexity of the UL task, but was not significantly different between HC and cognitive intact, but mildly motor disabled pwMS.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Irie, Keisuke, Hirokatsu Iseki, Satomi Okamoto, Seiji Nishimura, Akio Kobe, and Kenji Kagechika. "Validity and responsiveness of the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function." Hand Therapy 22, no. 4 (2017): 133–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758998317719095.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction Despite widespread use of the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function, we were unable to find studies to affirm the validity and responsiveness in patients with trauma and inflammatory diseases. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the criterion validity and responsiveness of the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function, a tool which is widely used in Japan. Methods Thirty patients between the ages of 20 and 82 years with distal radius fracture (n = 10), and cervical spondylosis myelopathy (n = 20) were included in this study. Concurrent validity was tested by examining the correlation between Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function, the Purdue Pegboard Test, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. In addition, standardized response means were calculated to compare the responsiveness of the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function with Purdue Pegboard Test and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Results The correlation coefficient between Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function and Purdue Pegboard Test was 0.70, and the correlation between Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was −0.55 (p < 0.05). Standardized response mean shows that the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (0.69) is more responsive than the Purdue Pegboard Test (0.53), and less responsive than Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (0.97). Conclusions The Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function demonstrates concurrent validity and responsiveness as a performance based assessment of dexterity in patients with distal radius fracture and cervical spondylosis. We conclude that the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function could be used as a measure of dexterity or clinical change after therapy intervention. The Purdue Pegboard Test may be used for patients with an occupation that requires integrated fine motor skills and bimanual activity, whereas the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function may be more suitable for patients who use a variety of unilateral grips such as pinch and span. The Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand can complement each other when measuring someone’s activity and participation level.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Verdino, Michele, and Sherry Dingman. "Two Measures of Laterality in Handedness: The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and the Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity." Perceptual and Motor Skills 86, no. 2 (1998): 476–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.2.476.

Full text
Abstract:
This study investigated the relationship between a paper-and-pencil measure of laterality in handedness, the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, and a test of manual dexterity, the Purdue Pegboard test. Individuals of extreme handedness based on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Laterality Quotients of +90 to +100 and −100 and +54; 50 each) were recruited to complete the Purdue Pegboard test of manual dexterity. Subjects in the sinistral group had significantly smaller mean discrepancy scores in performance between their hands [ t80 = 5.12, p=.0001] and much greater variance in performance than dextral subjects ( F1,98 = 2.85, p=.0001). These findings suggest that paper-and-pencil measures of lateral preference for handedness may not identify proficiency of subgroups within a sinistral group.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Shin, Sohee, Shinichi Demura, and Hiroki Aoki. "Effects of Prior Use of Chopsticks on Two Different Types of Dexterity Tests: Moving Beans Test and Purdue Pegboard." Perceptual and Motor Skills 108, no. 2 (2009): 392–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.108.2.392-398.

Full text
Abstract:
The Purdue Pegboard and Moving Beans with Tweezers test have been used in the rehabilitation of persons with nervous system disorders; however, these two tests differ in their methodology. In the latter test, the testee picks up items with chopsticks or tweezers, but in the former test, the testee grasps items directly with the fingers of one hand. Use experience of a tool may strongly influence performance. The present study examined the use of chopsticks in daily life on performance of the two tests of finger dexterity by two groups of 20 youths who habitually used chopsticks to eat and 20 who did not. Three 30-sec. trials with the dominant and nondominant hands were given. Analysis of variance gave a main effect for number of beans moved between the two groups, hand (nondominant vs dominant), and trials. Significantly more beans were moved by the group with prior chopsticks use than the nonusers by the dominant hand than the nondominant hand, and on Trials 2 and 3 than Trial 1. For the Purdue Pegboard, the only significant difference for trials showed fewer pegs moved on Trial 1 than Trial 3. In conclusion, the groups who habitually used chopsticks performed better on the Moving Beans with Tweezers test than the group without such experience. Also, the marked laterality and practice effects for chopstick users was not observed on the Purdue Pegboard.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Schuele, Kara, Mary Beth Tumminello, and Phil Esposito. "Test–Retest of the Purdue Pegboard in Adults With Intellectual Disabilities." American Journal of Occupational Therapy 70, no. 4_Supplement_1 (2016): 7011500058p1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.70s1-po5105.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Waliño-Paniagua, Carmen Nélida, Cristina Gómez-Calero, María Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo, et al. "Effects of a Game-Based Virtual Reality Video Capture Training Program Plus Occupational Therapy on Manual Dexterity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2019 (April 22, 2019): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9780587.

Full text
Abstract:
Neurorehabilitation is a fundamental aspect in the treatment approach for multiple sclerosis (MS), in which new technologies have gained popularity, especially the use of virtual reality (VR). The aim of this paper is to analyze an occupational therapy (OT) intervention compared with OT + VR (OT + VR) on the manual dexterity of patients with MS. 26 MS subjects were initially recruited from an MS patient association and randomized into two groups. The OT group received 20 conventional OT sessions distributed in two sessions per week. The OT + VR group received 20 sessions of VR interventions, twice weekly and lasting 30 minutes, consisting of VR games accessed via the online web pagemotiongamingconsole.com, in addition to the conventional OT sessions. Pre- and postintervention assessments were based on the Purdue Pegboard Test, the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and the Grooved Pegboard Test. Clinical improvements were found regarding the precision of movements, the execution times, and the efficiency of certain functional tasks in the Purdue Pegboard Test and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test tests in the OT + VR group. Although significant differences were not found in the manual dexterity between the OT and OT + VR groups, improvements were found regarding the precision and effectiveness of certain functional tasks.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Purdue pegboard test"

1

Kaňková, Hana. "Objektivizace jemné motoriky u pacientů po traumatickém poškození mozku pomocí testu Purdue Pegboard." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-351435.

Full text
Abstract:
of diploma thesis: Objective In the Czech republic there is no normative data for Purdue pegboard test in any reprezentative group of people. First goal of this diploma thesis is to determine basic normative data Purdue pegboard test in not representative sample of people with traumatic brain injury at the age of 22-40 years in chronic phase. Second goal is to determine clinical utility of Purdue pegboard test in this clinical population group of people. The Student t-test and ambiguity proportion was used to statistic analyse the hypothesis. As a graphic processing was choosen the linear equation with the image of the Gaussian curve. There are analysed 3 case studies about people with traumatic brain injury to accomplish second goal. There is no significant difference in Purdue pegboard test score in employed and unemployed people with traumatic brain injury, equally to women and men with traumatic brain injury. There is evidence, that age influence score of Purdue pegboard test in men with traumatic brain injury, but not in women with traumatic brain injury. There are presented basic norms of Purdue pegboard test in people with traumatic brain injury in standard and percentile scale in this thesis. Normative data in people with traumatic brain injury makes easier to work with this clinical...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hsieh, Yao, and 謝遙. "A Normative Study on the Purdue and Grooved Pegboard Tests for Normal Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years in North Taiwan." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/rtg2a6.

Full text
Abstract:
碩士<br>國立臺灣大學<br>心理學研究所<br>107<br>Background: The Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test are important neuropsychological tools to evaluate manual dexterity, processing speed, and multiple cognitive abilities. However, a lack of data regarding the recent Taiwanese normative and psychometric property limits their clinical utility. Objective: This study aimed to establish the North Taiwan normative data of the Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test for normal adults aged ≥ 50 years. Psychometric properties and influences of demographical variables on the performance on the test were investigated. Method: The study recruited 242 normal adults aged ≥ 50 years in north Taiwan who were stratified by demographic variables. A subgroup of 30 participants selected additionally by stratified random sampling according to the demographic variables were administered the Digit Symbol-Coding subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scaled-Third Edition (Taiwan version) for criterion-related validity examination. A subgroup of 30 participants, who were selected by stratified random sampling according to the demographic variables, were retested with a testing interval of at least one month later for test-retest reliability examination. Besides, 27 patients with neurocognitive disorder due to type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol, and neurotoxin were collected retrospectively through medical record in National Taiwan University Hospital for investigating the clinical validity. Results: Age and gender effects rather than an education one were evident in performing the Purdue Pegboard Test. Furthermore, an age effect rather than gender and education effect was evident in performing the Grooved Pegboard Test. The results also showed adequate test-retest reliability, and criterion-related, construct, and clinical validity for the Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test. The normative data showed good representativeness, recency, and relevance. Conclusion: The Purdue Pegboard Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test have adequate reliability and validity. Based on the significant evidence of demographic effects on test performance, the present study provides age and gender demographic-corrected Purdue pegboard normative data and a referential table for percentile ranks for research and clinical settings. The present study also provides age demographic-corrected Grooved pegboard normative data and a referential table for percentile ranks for research and clinical settings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Purdue pegboard test"

1

McLellan, Tracey. "Purdue Pegboard Dexterity Test." In Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2322.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bakhshipour, Elham, Reza Koiler, Kimberly Milla, and Nancy Getchell. "Understanding the Cognitive Demands of the Purdue Pegboard Test: An fNIRs Study." In Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Purdue pegboard test' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography