To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Radical Collaboration.

Journal articles on the topic 'Radical Collaboration'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Radical Collaboration.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Yunus, Erlinda N. "Leveraging supply chain collaboration in pursuing radical innovation." International Journal of Innovation Science 10, no. 3 (September 3, 2018): 350–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijis-05-2017-0039.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between supply chain collaboration and innovation. It particularly investigates the effect of collaboration on radical innovation and highlights the positive impact of innovation, both radical and incremental, on business performance.Design/methodology/approachA survey of 230 Indonesian firms was conducted and the instrument was tested for reliability and validity to warrant its psychometric properties. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.FindingsThis study reveals that collaboration with suppliers brings radical innovation, while collaboration with customers brings incremental innovation. Contrary to this study’s conjecture, albeit interesting, collaboration with customers negatively affects radical innovation. Both radical and incremental innovations further exert a positive influence over firm performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis study focuses on the relationships between supply chain collaboration, innovation and firm performance. The results enhance our understanding of types of innovation that are promoted by each dimension of collaboration. Further studies could extend the research by using a more elaborate measure of innovation or perform a longitudinal examination.Practical implicationsManagers are encouraged to pursue innovation as it improves firm performance. They could exploit their current partnership with customers to generate incremental innovation or leverage their supplier network to develop radical innovation.Originality/valueStudies that specifically investigate the impact of firms’ collaboration with their supply chain partners on radical innovation are quite scarce. This empirical study is among the very few to fill this void by providing an integrative assessment of customer, supplier and internal collaborations and their impact on both radical and incremental innovation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McGovern, Nancy. "Radical Collaboration: An Archival View." Research Library Issues, no. 296 (December 20, 2018): 53–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/rli.296.8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Thi Mai Anh, Nguyen, Lei Hui, Vu Dinh Khoa, and Sultan Mehmood. "Relational capital and supply chain collaboration for radical and incremental innovation." Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 31, no. 4 (September 9, 2019): 1076–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/apjml-10-2018-0423.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between relational capital and supply chain collaboration (SCC) and how this relationship relates to innovation. The authors propose a theoretical framework to illustrate the effect of relational capital on three dimensions of collaboration and radical and incremental innovation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper has a quantitative approach. The authors conducted the survey to collect the data from 225 suppliers in the Hunan province of China. The proposed model is tested with exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling.FindingsThe findings show that relational capital can facilitate information sharing and benefit/risk sharing when firms work together to achieve innovation. Furthermore, the results indicate that relational capital leads to radical innovation through facilitating information sharing among firms and helps in generating incremental innovation by encouraging firms to share risks and benefits with their partners.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study give some suggestions for managers of the firms in terms of building their collaborative strategies. Managers should exploit relational capital to build successful and long-term collaboration. Also, through relational capital, managers can share information to create radical innovation or pool risks and share benefits with their customers to achieve incremental innovation.Originality/valueThis study provides a nuanced understanding of the relationship between relational capital, different dimensions of SCC and innovation in the context of a developing economy. Moreover, the findings provide a clearer understanding of the collaborative mechanism of relational capital and collaboration to achieve radical and incremental innovation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Coombes, Brad. "Collaboration: Inter-subjectivity or radical pedagogy?" Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 56, no. 2 (May 30, 2012): 290–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00429.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Altuna, Naiara, Claudio Dell’Era, Paolo Landoni, and Roberto Verganti. "Developing radically new meanings through the collaboration with radical circles." European Journal of Innovation Management 20, no. 2 (May 8, 2017): 269–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ejim-06-2015-0045.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose The importance and complexity of proposing radically new meanings are well-established in the literature. However, a limited number of contributions have analyzed how they can be developed. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the development of radically new meanings at the basis of the Slow Food movement to contribute to the topic. Design/methodology/approach In order to better understand how social movements can propose radically new meanings and how companies can take inspiration and build a competitive advantage by leveraging the proposed meanings, the authors deeply analyzed the genealogy of Slow Food, interpreted as an inspiring case study; the authors adopt a narrative approach. Findings The analysis of how Slow Food emerged and evolved into an international movement reveals an alternative way to develop innovative meanings in collaboration with groups of radicals. The authors identify three main phases in the evolution of innovative meanings: generation, institutionalization and development. Practical implications In terms of managerial implications the authors contribute highlighting the importance of a new type of collaborative innovation: the collaboration with radical circles and social movements in their early stage. Social implications From a societal point of view, if the authors acknowledge the importance of social movements in contesting and actively changing institutions, the authors can see the importance for policy makers to create loci and opportunities for the emergence of radical circles and their experimentations. Originality/value The authors propose that new meanings are frequently the result of small groups of individuals gathering in radical circles. The core attribute of such circles is group validation. The group supports the Slow Food leader in refining the meaning and confronting the dominant paradigm.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Heidemann Lassen, Astrid, Daniel Ljungberg, and Maureen McKelvey. "Promoting Future Sustainable Transition by Overcoming the Openness Paradox in KIE Firms." Sustainability 12, no. 24 (December 17, 2020): 10567. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su122410567.

Full text
Abstract:
A key issue for transition to a more sustainable future is how to promote collaboration for innovation amongst multiple diverse partners. However, collaborating for innovation requires that firms overcome the paradox of openness, i.e., they need to be open to collaboration to innovate and at the same time protect their internal knowledge and intellectual assets to appropriate value from their innovations. The aim of this paper is to investigate how knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial (KIE) firms can overcome this paradox—which is an important barrier to future transitions—by choosing a combination of collaborative partners and appropriability strategies that support their ability to create more radical innovations. We analyze a sample of over 2450 KIE firms, drawing from a cross-European survey. Our results indicate how different partners, and different appropriability strategies, are more, or less, relevant to the generation of the radical innovations needed to transform society into one with a sustainable future; university collaboration and the use of formal protection mechanisms seem especially important for such new-to-the-world innovations. Our study includes important policy implications for how to support and promote future sustainable transitions and also establishes a foundation for future lines of research regarding entrepreneurship and sustainable transition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Jimenez-Jimenez, Daniel, Micaela Martínez-Costa, and Cristobal Sanchez Rodriguez. "The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation." Journal of Knowledge Management 23, no. 3 (April 8, 2019): 548–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0019.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThe high level of competition in the globalized business environment forces companies to innovate to remain competitive. Previous literature often cites information technology (IT) and supply chain collaboration as direct contributors to product innovation and IT as a direct enabler of supply chain collaboration. This suggests that IT could have an indirect effect on product innovation through supply chain collaboration, although this relationship has not been addressed yet. This paper aims to analyze empirically the direct impacts of IT and supply chain collaboration on incremental and radical product innovation and the indirect effect of IT on both types of product innovation through supply chain collaboration by using data collected from a sample of 200 manufacturing firms.Design/methodology/approachStructural equation modeling was used to check the research hypotheses with a sample of 200 manufacturing companies.FindingsThe results show supply chain collaboration has a positive effect on technological innovation, showing that the collaboration with external agents foster both incremental and radical innovations. Furthermore, results show that IT directly enhances both types of product innovation (incremental and radical) indirectly through supply chain collaboration.Research limitations/implicationsThis article supports the pursuit of open innovation that suggests the need to acquire external knowledge to be able to develop innovation projects. The use of tools that facilitate this transmission of knowledge becomes indispensable in environments in which companies must be involved in supply chains in which different external agents intervene and in which collaboration can promote the creation of synergies and superior competitive advantages.Practical implicationsInnovation requires more and more the use of knowledge management practices that capture external information to be used in the creation of new products. In this case, collaboration within a supply chain facilitates incremental and radical innovations. However, to strengthen this transfer of information and the adoption of behaviors that stimulate innovation, the company must use ITs.Originality/valueThis paper focus on the indirect effect of IT on product innovation through the creation of the collaborations with external agents. In spite of the importance of this relation, it has been poorly studied by previous literature. The paper’s greatest interest lies in the fact that ITs not only facilitate the transmission of knowledge but also facilitate other types of behavior among supply chain agents that invite collaboration and generate innovations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ashok, Mona, Rajneesh Narula, and Andrea Martinez-Noya. "How do collaboration and investments in knowledge management affect process innovation in services?" Journal of Knowledge Management 20, no. 5 (September 12, 2016): 1004–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jkm-11-2015-0429.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose Despite the keen interest in radical and incremental innovation, few studies have tested the varying impact of firm-level factors in service sectors. This paper analyses how collaboration with existing and prospective users and investments in knowledge management (KM) practices can be adapted to maximise the outputs of radical and incremental process innovation in a knowledge-intensive business service industry. Design/methodology/approach Original survey data from 166 information technology service firms and interviews with 13 executives provide the empirical evidence. Partial least squares-structural equation modelling is used to analyse the data. Findings Collaboration with different types of users, and investments in KM practices affect radical versus incremental process innovation differently. Collaboration with existing users influences incremental process innovation directly, but not radical innovation; and prospective user collaboration matters for radical, but not incremental innovation. Furthermore, for radical innovation, investments in KM practices mediate the impact of prospective user collaboration on innovation. Research limitations/implications While collaboration with existing users for incremental process innovations does not appear to generate significant managerial challenges, to pursue radical innovations firms must engage in intensive collaboration with prospective users. Higher involvement with prospective users requires higher investment in KM practices to promote efficient intra- and inter-firm knowledge flows. Originality/value This study is based on a large-scale survey, together with management interviews. Radical and incremental innovations in the service industry require engagements with different kinds of users, and the use of KM tools.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bickel, Barbara, Stephanie Springgay, Ruth Beer, Rita L. Irwin, Kit Grauer, and Gu Xiong. "A/r/tographic Collaboration as Radical Relatedness." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 10, no. 1 (March 2011): 86–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000107.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Van Gils, Maarten J. G. M., Geert Vissers, and Ben Dankbaar. "Industry–science collaboration for radical innovation: the discovery of phase-dependent collaborative configurations." Innovation 17, no. 3 (July 3, 2015): 308–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1054602.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Ruttenberg, Judy, and Elizabeth Waraksa. "Why Does Research Data Management Need Radical Collaboration?" Research Library Issues, no. 296 (December 20, 2018): 3–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/rli.296.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

McGovern, Nancy. "Radical Collaboration and Research Data Management: An Introduction." Research Library Issues, no. 296 (December 20, 2018): 6–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/rli.296.2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Kukla, Rebecca. "“Author TBD”: Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research." Philosophy of Science 79, no. 5 (December 2012): 845–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/668042.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Mulyati, Erna. "MULTIGROUP ANALYSIS IN SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE." Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen 21, no. 2 (September 2020): 100–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/jbm.v21i2.466.

Full text
Abstract:
This study aims to examine differences in private and government third-party logistics companies in Indonesia in terms of improving supply chain performance. In this research, supply chain performance testing is influenced by collaboration, radical innovation, and incremental innovation. The sample used is the third-party logistics industry in West Java and DKI Jakarta, totaling 100, which is divided into private third-party logistic companies and government-owned third-party logistics companies. The results showed that there are differences in the effects of collaboration. There is supply chain performance where there are differences in the influence of collaboration and radical innovation on supply chain performance between private companies and government. There is no difference in the influence of collaboration and incremental innovation on supply chain performance between private companies and the government. The findings of this study indicate that radical and incremental innovation acts as a partial mediation on the effect of collaboration on supply chain performance in private and government companies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Lassen, Astrid Heidemann, and Bjørge Timenes Laugen. "Open innovation: on the influence of internal and external collaboration on degree of newness." Business Process Management Journal 23, no. 6 (November 6, 2017): 1129–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2016-0212.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test the effect of internal and external collaboration on the degree of newness (incremental/radical) in innovation projects. This adds to the understanding of the particular patterns of open innovation (OI) and what characterizes the innovation emerging through this approach. Design/methodology/approach Tests are performed on the effect of internal and external collaboration on the degree of newness (incremental/radical) in innovation projects. This adds to the understanding of the particular patterns of OI and what characterizes the innovation emerging through this approach. The empirical analysis is based on a data set including responses from 512 Danish engineers. Findings The results show that external collaboration has significantly different effects on the degree of newness depending on the type of external partners involved, and they also show that radical innovation output is positively related to involving the R&D department (internal) and universities (external involvement) and negatively related to involving suppliers. Originality/value The results provide a more detailed understanding of how different OI patterns affect the development of incremental vs radical innovation in existing organizations. In particular, three findings add new insights into how OI affects innovation to reach the highest degree of newness: high importance of collaboration with external partners with distinct interests and skills; low reliance on existing customers and suppliers for the development of radical innovation; and narrow and focused internal involvement rather than broad internal involvement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Ritala, Paavo, Kenneth Husted, Heidi Olander, and Snejina Michailova. "External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: the downsides of uncontrolled openness." Journal of Knowledge Management 22, no. 5 (June 11, 2018): 1104–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jkm-05-2017-0172.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose Inter-firm collaborative innovation typically requires knowledge sharing among individuals employed by collaborating firms. However, it is also associated with considerable risks, especially if the knowledge sharing process is not handled using proper judgment. Such risks have been acknowledged in the literature, but the underlying empirical evidence remains unclear. This study aims to examine how sharing of business-critical knowledge with external collaboration partners affects firm’s innovation performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors develop a mediating model and hypotheses predicting that the uncontrolled sharing of knowledge leads to accidental knowledge leakage, which, in turn, hinders particularly firm’s radical innovation performance. The authors test the model by using a survey of 150 technology-intensive firms in Finland and a partial least squares structural equation model. The mediating model is tested with incremental and radical innovation performance, and the authors control for firm size, age, R&D intensity and industry. Findings The authors find strong support for the model in that uncontrolled external knowledge sharing leads to accidental knowledge leaking and to lower radical innovation performance. The same results are not found for incremental innovation, implying that uncontrolled knowledge leakage is especially detrimental to radical innovation. Originality/value These findings help in better understanding some of the downsides of too much openness and lack of judgment about knowledge sharing beyond the boundaries of the firm. Thus, firms pursuing radical innovation should carefully guide their employees with regard to what knowledge they share, to what extent they share it and with whom they share it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Pickering, Brian, Timea Biro, Claire C. Austin, Alexander Bernier, Louise Bezuidenhout, Carlos Casorrán, Francis P. Crawley, et al. "Radical collaboration during a global health emergency: development of the RDA COVID-19 data sharing recommendations and guidelines." Open Research Europe 1 (June 16, 2021): 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13369.1.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic required a rapid and effective response. This included ethical and legally appropriate sharing of data. The European Commission (EC) called upon the Research Data Alliance (RDA) to recruit experts worldwide to quickly develop recommendations and guidelines for COVID-related data sharing. Purpose: The purpose of the present work was to explore how the RDA succeeded in engaging the participation of its community of scientists in a rapid response to the EC request. Methods: A survey questionnaire was developed and distributed among RDA COVID-19 work group members. A mixed-methods approach was used for analysis of the survey data. Results: The three constructs of radical collaboration (inclusiveness, distributed digital practices, productive and sustainable collaboration) were found to be well supported in both the quantitative and qualitative analyses of the survey data. Other social factors, such as motivation and group identity were also found to be important to the success of this extreme collaborative effort. Conclusions: Recommendations and suggestions for future work were formulated for consideration by the RDA to strengthen effective expert collaboration and interdisciplinary efforts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Shchipkov, Vasiliy A. "Orthodoxy and “Radical Orthodoxy”: Understanding of “Mediation” and Prospects of Collaboration." Almanac “Essays on Conservatism” 29 (September 19, 2019): 171–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.24030/24092517-2019-0-3-171-183.

Full text
Abstract:
The article critically examines the concept of “mediation” used by the modern conservative Christian philosophical and theological movement “Radical Orthodoxy” (arose at the end of the 20th century among Anglican and Catholic philosophers) and also puts the question about the prospects of dialogue between Orthodox tradition and the “Radical Orthodoxy”. The article gives general information about this movement and contemporary researches on it. It is noted that the term “Orthodoxy” in its name does not indicate a connection with Orthodoxy or any Christian denomination but is used in the sense close to the concept of Christian tradition and placed in a postmodern context. “Radical Orthodoxy” considers Christian theology a universal “mediator” which is designed to replace secular meta-discourse and strengthen the voice of Christianity in the world today. The author notes that the idea of universal mediation is connected with the gnostic approach to theology. Analyzing the principles of philosophical and theological constructions in this movement the author draws a parallel between the proposed concept of “mediation” and the fact that the authors of “Radical Orthodoxy” of all the themes of Russian religious philosophy showed special interest in gnostic Sofia. The article analyzes the origins of this view of Sofia and identifies the margins beyond which the Church considers sophiology to be a heresy. “Radical Orthodoxy” sophiologizes the concept of “mediation” in order to protect it from the threat of its “adaptation” to secular reality and to establish an ideal mediator which possesses the maximum possible explanatory theological flexibility. Nevertheless, this approach has some vulnerabilities, since its way of theologisation of secular discourse can lead to the opposite effect – the secularization of theology, which was sometimes done by Russian religious philosophers of the 19th-20th centuries. In conclusion the author argues that a successful dialogue between representatives of the Orthodox tradition and the “Radical Orthodoxy” is more promising in the socio-political plane than in the theological one.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Brown, Phil, Nancy Bocken, and Ruud Balkenende. "How Do Companies Collaborate for Circular Oriented Innovation?" Sustainability 12, no. 4 (February 22, 2020): 1648. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12041648.

Full text
Abstract:
Collaborative innovation is necessary to explore and implement circular economy strategies. Yet, empirical investigations into such collaborations are scarce. It is unclear whether the circular context creates differences or represents adaptions within how collaborative innovation is conducted. We draw upon strategic management and open innovation literature to highlight what is known about collaborative innovation and the types of innovation conducted. We use these insights to investigate explorative qualitative case research into how practitioners in the Netherlands have conducted collaborative circular oriented innovation. Our findings show that open innovation criteria can aid our understanding and analysis. Key managerial considerations relate to the incremental or systemic nature of the innovation pursued, which induce different collaborative projects and knowledge management structures. For incremental innovation, we observe phases of collaboration, whereas for more systemic innovation, we observe a more collaborative portfolio and layered approach. Furthermore, the more radical innovation pursuits that explore slowing or recovery strategies, especially beyond business-to-business arrangements, challenge companies. A crucial challenge remains related to how to develop and assess collaborative and system-oriented business models in the transition towards a circular economy. Finally, future research is needed to assess whether the current modes of collaborative innovation are sufficient to deliver a circular economy transition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Patil, C., and V. Siegel. "This revolution will be digitized: online tools for radical collaboration." Disease Models & Mechanisms 2, no. 5-6 (April 30, 2009): 201–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.003285.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Grimsby, Sveinung. "New novel food regulation and collaboration for innovation." British Food Journal 123, no. 1 (August 14, 2020): 245–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bfj-02-2020-0154.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper was to study the novel food (NF) industry in Europe and how regulations have affected companies' collaboration and openness towards other actors during new product development. The research question, therefore, was “How do the European NF regulations affect radical innovation in the food industry?”.Design/methodology/approachA multiphase mixed-methods design was used to combine three sets of data as follows: the NF applications and copies of these from 1997 to 2018; the applications in the first 18 months of the revised NF regulation period after 2018 and interviews with six NF applicant companies and seven experts on NF.FindingsInteractions with research and development (R&D) suppliers appear to be common during development of NF products for companies of all sizes. Ownership of knowledge and a conscious intellectual property rights strategy are important for companies' openness during radical innovation and collaboration. The decentralised NF regulations from 1997 to 2017, with reduced possibilities for data protection, prevented innovation. However, both old and new NF regulations facilitate easy routes for second-to-market approach. Companies of all sizes apply for NF-approved products under the new NF regulations, which ensure data protection.Practical implicationsFuture NF pioneers, food R&D suppliers and food-industry policymakers will benefit from open innovation and NF insights by gaining an understanding of NF regulations and insight into how a policy with open governance affects collaboration and co-creation.Originality/valueThe NF regulations and their effect on radical food innovation have not previously been studied according to innovation management theory. Understanding various forms of selective partnership and collaboration among actors in the food industry is valuable for future growth.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Carringer, Robert L. "Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship." Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 116, no. 2 (March 2001): 370–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/s0030812900105255.

Full text
Abstract:
It was not long ago that one prefecture of french culture was reinventing the idea of authorship while another one was trying to kill it off. The New Wave movement and post-structuralism, fundamental opposites in almost every respect, emerged at the same cultural moment. Roland Barthcs's Writing Degree Zero (1953) and François Truffaut's seminal essay in Cahiers du cinéma that instated auteur criticism (the first phase of the New Wave) appeared less than a year apart; the appearance of Michel Foucault's Madness and Civilization (1961) coincided with the triumph of New Wave filmmaking; and in the interval between 1966 and 1970, which saw the publication of The Order of Things, Of Grammatology, and S/Z, Jean-Luc Godard, the most iconoclastic of the New Wave critic-directors, released fourteen feature films, including four masterworks. In its classic phase poststructuralism was fixated on the written word, involved disciplined thought inflected by mainstream Continental philosophy, took on itself the burden of refashioning modern European history along Marxist lines, and could be uncompromisingly rectitudinous. The New Wave spoke the language of images, involved a loose and—except for its radical stylistics—rather tame avant-gardism, valued an aleatory, free-form aesthetic over political commitment, assailed mainstream French culture, and championed alternative forms of cultural production such as American popular movies. Yet the teleologies were similar: to inscribe a unique place in the history of authorship. To supplant the biographical author from the textual site, one of the primary motives of poststructuralism, was to make the collective space available for a higher entity, the philosopher-critic who is the author not of individual texts but of textuality, the social meaning of texts. In the same way, in claiming the textual site for a film author—a radical conception for the time—the auteur critics scripted a role for themselves that they would subsequently occupy as film directors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Carringer, Robert L. "Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship." PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 116, no. 2 (March 2001): 370–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2001.116.2.370.

Full text
Abstract:
It was not long ago that one prefecture of french culture was reinventing the idea of authorship while another one was trying to kill it off. The New Wave movement and post-structuralism, fundamental opposites in almost every respect, emerged at the same cultural moment. Roland Barthcs's Writing Degree Zero (1953) and François Truffaut's seminal essay in Cahiers du cinéma that instated auteur criticism (the first phase of the New Wave) appeared less than a year apart; the appearance of Michel Foucault's Madness and Civilization (1961) coincided with the triumph of New Wave filmmaking; and in the interval between 1966 and 1970, which saw the publication of The Order of Things, Of Grammatology, and S/Z, Jean-Luc Godard, the most iconoclastic of the New Wave critic-directors, released fourteen feature films, including four masterworks. In its classic phase poststructuralism was fixated on the written word, involved disciplined thought inflected by mainstream Continental philosophy, took on itself the burden of refashioning modern European history along Marxist lines, and could be uncompromisingly rectitudinous. The New Wave spoke the language of images, involved a loose and—except for its radical stylistics—rather tame avant-gardism, valued an aleatory, free-form aesthetic over political commitment, assailed mainstream French culture, and championed alternative forms of cultural production such as American popular movies. Yet the teleologies were similar: to inscribe a unique place in the history of authorship. To supplant the biographical author from the textual site, one of the primary motives of poststructuralism, was to make the collective space available for a higher entity, the philosopher-critic who is the author not of individual texts but of textuality, the social meaning of texts. In the same way, in claiming the textual site for a film author—a radical conception for the time—the auteur critics scripted a role for themselves that they would subsequently occupy as film directors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Weber-Sinn, Kristin, and Paola Ivanov. "“Collaborative” provenance research – About the (im)possibility of smashing colonial frameworks." Museum and Society 18, no. 1 (March 23, 2020): 66–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.29311/mas.v18i1.3295.

Full text
Abstract:
This article aims to reflect on the aporias and paradoxes of a postcolonial, collaborative research approach to ethnographic collections dating from colonial times. While, at least in Germany, ‘provenance research’ and ‘collaboration’ have become politically opportune, important questions concerning the possibilities or impossibilities of overcoming colonial categories, epistemologies and imbalances of power remain to be answered. Based on research and collaboration with stakeholders over the course of two projects on the Tanzania collections of the Ethnologisches Museum Berlin, this article asks how far ‘collaboration’ and ‘decolonization’ risk remaining merely empty, fashionable phrases, if, on the one hand, today’s concern with the colonial context of collections in European museums seems to be to a great extent self-referential and avoiding radical criticism of today’s power asymmetries; and, on the other, the deconstruction of colonial class, gender, race, and ethnic categorizations, and of the resulting representations is hindered – if not made impossible – by the epistemologies implicit in the order of the collections themselves but also by identity politics
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Aviv, Reuven, and Gady Golan. "Pedagogical Communication Patterns in Collaborative Telelearning." Journal of Educational Technology Systems 26, no. 3 (March 1998): 201–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/nx78-nx2t-jlmt-p8bn.

Full text
Abstract:
Collaborative learning is an indispensable part of Telelearning Distance Education courses. It is naturally implemented via such activities as data collection, projects, and field studies. The worldwide revolution in the telecommunication environment that has been gathering momentum in recent years is bringing radical changes in the collaboration channels. To prepare for these changes, it is vital to identify and solve a wide range of educational and organizational problems involving the embedding of learning and teaching procedures in a telecommunication rich environment. This article is concerned with the pedagogical communication patterns between students and tutors. The result of evaluating students behavior in a set of telelearning Computer Science courses show that they differentiate between the personal dimension of communicating with others and the group dimension which enable true collaborative work. The former depends mainly on the extent to which they need help, whereas the later depends on the design of the group collaboration and the creative leadership of the class teacher or the tutor.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Stevens, Vidar, and Annika Agger. "Managing Collaborative Innovation Networks – Practical Lessons from a Belgian Spatial Planning Initiative." Journal of Public Administration and Governance 7, no. 3 (August 25, 2017): 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i3.11748.

Full text
Abstract:
Collaborative innovation networks are increasingly used as vehicles for fostering innovative policy solutions. However, scholars have noted that the extent to which collaborative networks can actually contribute to the development of innovative policy solutions depends on how they are managed. Empirical research on the management of collaborative policy innovation processes is, however, scarce. Therefore, we review in this article a case to add new insights to the causal link between collaboration, management, and innovation. Specifically, we examine the management strategies which helped a Flemish administrative network to develop a radical new Spatial Planning Policy Plan. This study shows that the best way to manage collaborative innovation networks is not to press directly for results, but take the time to invest in relationship-building and together agree on a planning and clear process steps. Such a management approach allows actors to get to know each other and from thereon expand, with more background and appreciation for the others’ goals, behaviors, and intentions, their group activities concerning the formulation of a radical and innovative policy plan.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Truelove, Emily, and Katherine C. Kellogg. "The Radical Flank Effect and Cross-occupational Collaboration for Technology Development during a Power Shift." Administrative Science Quarterly 61, no. 4 (June 22, 2016): 662–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839216647679.

Full text
Abstract:
This 12-month ethnographic study of an early entrant into the U.S. car-sharing industry demonstrates that when an organization shifts its focus from developing radical new technology to incrementally improving this technology, the shift may spark an internal power struggle between the dominant engineering group and a challenger occupational group such as the marketing group. Analyzing 42 projects in two time periods that required collaboration between engineering and marketing during such a shift, we show how cross-occupational collaboration under these conditions can be facilitated by a radical flank threat, through which the bargaining power of moderates is strengthened by the presence of a more-radical group. In the face of a strong threat by radical members of a challenger occupational group, moderate members of the dominant engineering group may change their perceptions of their power to resist challengers’ demands and begin to distinguish between the goals of radical versus more-moderate challengers. To maintain as much power as possible and prevent the more-dramatic change in engineering occupational goals demanded by radical challengers, moderate engineers may build a coalition with moderate challengers and collaborate for incremental technology development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Stevens, Vidar. "How to Manage Collaborative Policy Innovation Networks? Practical Lessons from a Flemish Coastal Protection Initiative." Journal of Public Administration and Governance 7, no. 4 (October 29, 2017): 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i4.12078.

Full text
Abstract:
Collaborative policy innovation networks are increasingly used as vehicles for fostering innovative policy solutions. However, scholars have noted that the extent to which collaborative networks can actually contribute to the development of innovative policy solutions depends on how they are managed. Empirical research on the management of collaborative policy innovation networks has so far been limited. Therefore, a case is reviewed to add new insights to the link between collaboration, management, and policy innovation. Specifically, the management strategies are examined which helped a Flemish administrative network to develop a radical new Coastal Protection Policy Plan. This study shows that a clear procedural groundwork, playful mediating strategies, and a good people knowledge help network managers to facilitate the development of innovative policy solutions in a collaborative network.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Potterbusch, Megan. "What is Open Science, and How Can Radical Collaboration Facilitate It?" Research Library Issues, no. 296 (December 20, 2018): 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/rli.296.6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Liu, Zixu, Jianghua Zhou, Yudong Qi, and Yifan Liu. "How Collaboration with Different Level of Engagement Influence Firm’s Radical Innovation." Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, no. 1 (August 1, 2019): 13641. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.13641abstract.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Neal, James G. "Advancing From Kumbaya to Radical Collaboration: Redefining the Future Research Library." Journal of Library Administration 51, no. 1 (December 30, 2010): 66–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.531642.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

O'Malley, Lisa, Michele O'Dwyer, Regina C. McNally, and Stephen Murphy. "Identity, collaboration and radical innovation: The role of dual organisation identification." Industrial Marketing Management 43, no. 8 (November 2014): 1335–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Kuhl, Marcos Roberto, and Zoraide Da Fonseca Costa. "Influência da colaboração interorganizacional na implementação de inovações." International Journal of Innovation 7, no. 3 (September 9, 2019): 412–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i3.373.

Full text
Abstract:
Collaboration for innovation is addressed in several texts, but few bring empirical evidence of the influence of collaboration on innovation. Thus, the aim of this research is to identify and analyze the degree of the influence of collaboration on the implementation of innovations in Brazilian industries. The theoretical basis used consisted of texts that approach with innovation in a more consistent way and that specifically address collaboration for innovation. For data collection, a structured questionnaire applied to the Brazilian extractive and processing industries was used. This resulted a sample of 254 valid questionnaires. The questionnaire measured the innovation (5 variables), the sources of collaboration (9 variables) and the motives for collaborating (9 variables). The analyzes were based on the Exploratory Factor Analysis for the Motives and Sources constructs and the Multiple Linear Regression Analysis to verify the influence of Motives and Sources on Innovation. The results indicate that collaboration with subsidiaries or group companies, suppliers, customers and competitors has a significant and higher impact in relation to the five types of innovation evaluated. In the cases of radical and incremental innovation in process and Organizational Innovation, besides the sources already mentioned, one of the motives factors (access to resources) was also significant, indicating their influence on the implementation of innovations. As a theoretical contribution, this study seeks empirical evidence on the impact of collaboration on innovation, which is still in its infancy. As a practical contribution, it provides subsidies for companies and for the definition of public policies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Lee, Daniel, Kenneth Covinsky, and S. Ryan Greysen. "Social Incentives to Improve Mobility Among Elderly Patients After Radical Cystectomy." Innovation in Aging 4, Supplement_1 (December 1, 2020): 817–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2977.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Radical cystectomy is a complex surgery that disproportionately affects elderly patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. We proposed a randomized control trial to improve mobility using gamification and social incentives while hospitalized, and immediately after surgery at home. Social incentives may be particularly useful in this population as the majority of cystectomy patients rely on a primary caregiver. There have been multiple challenges in this interdisciplinary work to utilize innovative technologies. This would represent one of the first use of gamification and behavioral economic principles in postoperative patients, so there are questions about how patients would respond to gamification while recovering postoperatively. There were challenges in patient selection and interdisciplinary collaboration to consider, especially in an elderly population that may not have ready mobile access. By collaborating across disciplines, we hope to make significant improvements in postoperative outcomes for elderly patients by utilizing innovative interventions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Taufani, Taufani. "RADIKALISME ISLAM: SEJARAH, KARAKTERISTIK, DAN DINAMIKA DALAM MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTURAL DI INDONESIA." ASKETIK 3, no. 2 (January 25, 2020): 111–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.30762/ask.v3i2.1535.

Full text
Abstract:
This study aims to elaborate the history, characteristic, and dynamics of Radical Islam group in Indonesia. Post New Order era has opened political opportunity for radical Islam group to colour the Islamic and political dynamics in Indonesia. This study concluded that radicalism teaching was not something new in Islamic history. Radical Islam group could flourish due to the political openness milieu post New Order Era as well as the infiltration of radical Islam teaching rooted in Middle East into Indonesian Islam. To anticipate the strengthening of Radical Islam group influence in Indonesia, the collaboration between the state and the populace are highly needed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

GONZÁLEZ-BENITO, Óscar, Pablo A. MUÑOZ-GALLEGO, and Evelyn GARCÍA-ZAMORA. "ROLE OF COLLABORATION IN INNOVATION SUCCESS: DIFFERENCES FOR LARGE AND SMALL BUSINESSES." Journal of Business Economics and Management 17, no. 4 (July 8, 2016): 645–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.823103.

Full text
Abstract:
This article analyses the role of collaboration in the contribution of innovation to business performance. Moreover, the analysis considers business size as a key control variable to understand the moderating role of collaboration in innovation success. A survey administered to Spanish firms from industrial, building, agriculture, and trade-service sectors measured two levels of innovation, incremental and radical, and two dimensions of collaboration, channel and consulting advice. The findings show that the probability of success increases when firms use collaboration to support innovation efforts. In addition, small businesses take more advantage of channel collaboration, whereas large businesses rely more on consulting advice-based collaboration. These findings suggest that the convenience of different collaboration approaches depend on business size. Also small and large firms differ on the way they might get additional advantages from alternative ways of collaboration. Therefore, the main contribution is the understanding of how innovation success depends on the interaction between the collaboration approach and business size.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Wright, Kirsten, and Nicola Laurent. "Safety, Collaboration, and Empowerment." Archivaria, no. 91 (June 29, 2021): 38–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1078465ar.

Full text
Abstract:
In order to undertake liberatory memory work, engage effectively with communities and individuals, and centre people rather than records in their work, archival organizations must be aware of trauma and its effects. This article introduces the concept of trauma-informed practice to archives and other memory organizations. Trauma-informed practice is a strengths-based approach for organizations that acknowledges the pervasiveness of trauma and the risk and potential for people to be retraumatized through engagement with organizations such as archives and seeks to minimize triggers and negative interactions. It provides a framework of safety and offers a model of collaboration and empowerment that recognizes and centres the expertise of the individuals and communities documented within the records held in archives. Traumainformed practice also provides a way for archivists to practically implement many of the ideas discussed in the literature, including liberatory memory work, radical empathy, and participatory co-design. This article proposes several areas where a trauma-informed approach may be useful in archives and may lead to trauma-informed archival practice that provides better outcomes for all: users, staff, and memory organizations in general. Applying trauma-informed archival practice is multidimensional. It requires the comprehensive review of archival practice, theory, and processes and the consideration of the specific needs of individual memory organizations and the people who interact with them. Each organization should implement trauma-informed practice in the way that will achieve outcomes appropriate for its own context. These out comes can include recognizing and acknowledging past wrongs, ensuring safety for archives users and staff, empowering communities documented in archives, and using archives for justice and healing.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Plaskon, Dawn. "Radical Collaboration: Five Essential Skills to Overcome Defensiveness and Build Successful Relationships." Quality Management Journal 12, no. 4 (January 2005): 59–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2005.11919273.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Kohnen, James. "Radical Collaboration: Five Essential Skills to Overcome Defensiveness and Build Successful Relationships." Quality Management Journal 13, no. 4 (January 2006): 51–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2006.11918574.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Hubbard, Susan S., Charuleka Varadharajan, Yuxin Wu, Haruko Wainwright, and Dipankar Dwivedi. "Emerging technologies and radical collaboration to advance predictive understanding of watershed hydrobiogeochemistry." Hydrological Processes 34, no. 15 (June 12, 2020): 3175–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13807.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Anasti, Theresa. "Radical Professionals? Sex Worker Rights Activists and Collaboration With Human Service Nonprofits." Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 41, no. 4 (December 9, 2016): 416–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1270243.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Chade, Daher C., Shahrokh F. Shariat, Angel M. Cronin, Caroline J. Savage, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Michael L. Blute, Alberto Briganti, et al. "Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiation-recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Collaboration." European Urology 60, no. 2 (August 2011): 205–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Li, Jinsheng, Yi Shi, and Lu Xu. "Evolutionary Dynamics of Interfirm Cooperative System for Radical Innovation from Knowledge Collaboration Perspective." Complexity 2020 (August 13, 2020): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8253856.

Full text
Abstract:
Interfirm cooperation can be seen as a significant and effective way for exploring radical innovation. In this article, a framework of interfirm cooperation, with a core manufacture and upstream counterparties in industry, and its evolving mechanism in the reverse-chain radical innovation are established from the perspective of the fundamental role played by knowledge collaboration. Then, an evolution model of interfirm cooperation is constructed on the theory of vibration mechanics, and its evolutionary dynamics is explored through numerical and simulation analysis mainly on the key factors of knowledge potential difference and knowledge rent-seeking behaviour within the firms. The findings show that, if there is no knowledge-based rent-seeking behaviour from the upstream firms, the probable innovative performance from the interfirm cooperation should vary for the knowledge potential difference between the cooperative firms, but can come to a certain equilibrium state. Meanwhile, if the knowledge rent-seeking behaviour does exist, knowledge potential difference would lead the innovative performance evolving ultimately in divergence. What’s more, the negative effect caused by the rent-seeking behaviour could be alleviated or weakened to some extent by the excitation mechanisms presented by the core firms in the cooperation system. Therefore, the drawn conclusions should be useful for the core manufactures’ implementing various strategies to maintain or enhance the cooperation for radical innovation in industry.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Reis Neto, José Francisco dos, Pablo Antonio Muñoz-Gallego, Celso Correia de Souza, Denise Renata Pedrinho, Silvio Favero, and Alex Sandro Richter von Mühlen. "Strategic orientations and cooperation of external agents in the innovation process of rural enterprises." Ciência Rural 46, no. 10 (July 21, 2016): 1878–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160094.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT: This article provides empirical evidence for the relationship between the market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and collaboration of external actors in the processes of incremental and radical innovations in rural enterprises. The research tested two sets of assumptions: first, the relation between contributions of strategic orientation and innovation processes; and second, collaborations of external stakeholders in the implementation of innovation processes. Data were collected from 208 rural enterprises and analyzed with the use of techniques of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results showed that the market orientation contributes to the development of incremental innovation, and that the entrepreneurial orientation contributes to the implementation of the incremental and radical innovations. Specific agents (buyers, suppliers of goods and services, consultants, and others producers), collaborate positively in implementing incremental innovation; however, generic agents do not. The generic agents (universities and specialized public organizations) are the ones that most intervene in radical innovations. The use of consistent theory in the areas of strategy, marketing and management in identifying that some of their causal relationships are confirmed for rural businesses unlike others, due to the structure of the market and the products produced by them.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Hao, Bin, and Yanan Feng. "How networks influence radical innovation: the effects of heterogeneity of network ties and crowding out." Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 31, no. 6 (July 4, 2016): 758–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbim-09-2012-0165.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose This paper aims to offer a novel set of insights to understand the role of network ties in pursuit of radical innovation. In this sense, the purpose of the study is to analyze how the heterogeneity in the content of network ties affects radical innovation performance. Design/methodology/approach Based on a comprehensive review of existing literature, this paper conceptualizes how different types of network ties affect radical innovation performance by deriving five research propositions. Findings Both buyer-supplier ties and peer collaboration ties are positively related to radical innovation performance, whilst the peer collaboration ties may be further affected by partner similarity. Compared to other two types of network ties, equity ties act as more of moderating roles on spurring radical innovation. Crowding out between network ties prevents firms from knowledge searching within an extensive network scope, reducing the opportunities of mixing and matching different kinds of knowledge needed for radical innovation. Research limitations/implications The study suggests a natural way of launching marketing strategy by selectively integrating different sources of knowledge (market, supplier or technology) needed for commercializing radical technologies, highlighting the importance of partner selection for radical innovation among different types of firms surrounding the current market. For managers, it is necessary to identify and select network ties helpful for long-term business and strategic interests. Originality/value This paper makes two main contributions. First, it addresses the question of how networks influence radical innovation by identifying three types of network ties and their effects – individual and in combination – on extension of the depth and breadth of knowledge and development of disruptive ideas. Second, it develops the existing literature by demonstrating the crowding-out effect of network ties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Bracken, Pat, and Phil Thomas. "Beyond consultation: the challenge of working with user/survivor and carer groups." Psychiatric Bulletin 33, no. 7 (July 2009): 241–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021428.

Full text
Abstract:
SummaryRecent years have seen increased pressures on psychiatrists to work closely with user/survivor and carer groups. We argue that although many groups are happy for this to remain at the level of consultation, there are growing demands from more radical elements of the user/survivor movement for moves towards a more collaborative framework. A number of these groups challenge some of the central assumptions of psychiatry. for productive engagement and collaboration to take place, psychiatry will have to be able to react positively, not defensively, to these challenges. We suggest that this raises questions about how we should think about the nature of science, truth and expertise.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Allen, Davina. "Analysing healthcare coordination using translational mobilization." Journal of Health Organization and Management 32, no. 3 (May 21, 2018): 358–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhom-05-2017-0116.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce translational mobilization theory (TMT) and explore its application for healthcare quality improvement purposes.Design/methodology/approachTMT is a generic sociological theory that explains how projects of collective action are progressed in complex organizational contexts. This paper introduces TMT, outlines its ontological assumptions and core components, and explores its potential value for quality improvement using rescue trajectories as an illustrative case.FindingsTMT has value for understanding coordination and collaboration in healthcare. Inviting a radical reconceptualization of healthcare organization, its potential applications include: mapping healthcare processes, understanding the role of artifacts in healthcare work, analyzing the relationship between content, context and implementation, program theory development and providing a comparative framework for supporting cross-sector learning.Originality/valuePoor coordination and collaboration are well-recognized weaknesses in modern healthcare systems and represent important risks to quality and safety. While the organization and delivery of healthcare has been widely studied, and there is an extensive literature on team and inter-professional working, we lack readily accessible theoretical frameworks for analyzing collaborative work practices. TMT addresses this gap in understanding.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Sutherland, Rosamund, and Frank Fischer. "Future learning spaces: design, collaboration, knowledge, assessment, teachers, technology and the radical past." Technology, Pedagogy and Education 23, no. 1 (January 2, 2014): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2013.870107.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Margulis, Vitaly, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Surena F. Matin, Ashish M. Kamat, Richard Zigeuner, Eiji Kikuchi, Yair Lotan, Alon Weizer, Jay D. Raman, and Christopher G. Wood. "Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: A series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration." Cancer 115, no. 6 (March 15, 2009): 1224–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24135.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Resch, Bernhard, and Chris Steyaert. "Peer Collaboration as a Relational Practice: Theorizing Affective Oscillation in Radical Democratic Organizing." Journal of Business Ethics 164, no. 4 (January 3, 2020): 715–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04395-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography