Books on the topic 'Radiographic evaluation'

Unett, Elizabeth M., and Amanda J. Royle. Radiographic Techniques and Image Evaluation. Edited by Jo Campling. Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2997-6.

Wasti, Faranza. Radiographic evaluation of root canal systems. University of Manchester, 1994.

Kengyelics, S. M. Technical evaluation of FUJI ST-VA computed radiography image plates under standard radiographic conditions. Edited by Cowen A. R, Medical Devices Agency, and Facility for the Assessment of X-ray Imaging at Leeds University. Department of Health, Medical Devices Agency, 1997.

Kengyelics, S. M. Technical evaluation of the Philips AC3 computed radiography system under high - kVp thorax radiographic conditions. Department of Health, Medical Devices Agency, 1996.

Generazio, Edward R. Ultrasonic and radiographic evaluation of advanced aerospace material: Ceramic composites. NASA, 1990.

Generazio, Edward R. Ultrasonic and radiographic evaluation of advanced aerospace material: Ceramic composites. NASA, 1990.

E, Wood Robert. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the oral manifestations of systemic sclerosis. [Faculty of Dentistry], University of Toronto, 1986.

Rajendra, Acharya U., ed. Performance evaluation of breast cancer: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment. American Scientific Publishers, 2010.

Friedland, Bernard. The radiographic evaluation of a porous-surfaced titanium alloy dental implant system in beagle dogs. Faculty of Dentistry], University of Toronto, 1985.

W, Goldman Lee, Yester Michael V, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine., eds. Specifications, performance evaluation, and quality assurance of radiographic and fluoroscopic systems in the digital era. Published for the American Association of Physicists in Medicine by Medical Physics Publishing, 2004.

Launders, J. H. An evaluation of Philips Medical Systems Thoravision chest X-ray system using revised radiographic factors. Edited by Medical Devices Agency and Facility for the Assessment of X-ray Imaging at Leeds University. Department of Health, Medical Devices Agency, 1997.

National Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Screening mammograms: Current scientific evaluation. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1994.

Great Britain. Medical Devices Directorate., ed. An Evaluation of the Siemens (DLR) digital luminescence radiography systems. Department of Health, Medical Devices Directorate, 1991.

Sheard, L. User evaluation of the RTL test phantom for intraoral dental radiography. Departmentof Health, Medical Devices Agency, 1997.

Klem, Rosemary. Evaluation prior to selection of clinical placement departments in diagnostic radiography. University of Birmingham, 1992.

Agency, Medical Devices, ed. An evaluation of Philips Medical Systems computed radiography distributed user interface. DepartmentofHealth, Medical Devices Agency, 1994.

Launders, J. H. Evaluation of the imaging performance of 3M asymmetric radiography film screen Chest system. Department of Health, Medical Devices Agency, 1996.

Bolster, A. A. Gamma camera performance: Technical assessment protocol: report. Medical Devices Agency, 1996.

Canada. Health Canada. Evaluation Indicators Working Group. Guidelines for monitoring breast screening program performance: Report from the Evaluation Indicators Working Group. 2nd ed. Public Health Agency of Canada, 2007.

Medical Devices Agency. Gamma Camera Assessment Team. Wholebody technical evaluation: Cameras assessed : GE Millennium VG, Marconi Axis, GE Maxxus, Picker Prism 2000XP. Medical Devices Agency, 2001.

Young, K. C. Mammographic dose and image quality in the UK Breast Screening Programme. NHSBSP, 1995.

Hernandez, John B. Evaluating a multi-hospital quality improvement strategy to implement clinical guidelines for radiographic contrast agents. Rand, 1998.

Hernandez, John B. Evaluating a multi-hospital quality improvement strategy to implement clinical guidelines for radiographic contrast agents. Rand, 1998.

Hernandez, John B. Evaluating a multi-hospital quality improvement strategy to implement clinical guidelines for radiographic contrast agents. Rand, 1998.

Hernandez, John B. Evaluating a multi-hospital quality improvement strategy to implement clinical guidelines for radiographic contrast agents. Rand, 1998.

Hernandez, John B. Evaluating a multi-hospital quality improvement strategy to implement clinical guidelines for radiographic contrast agents. Rand, 1998.

Åsard, Per-Erik. Some radiation detectors and radionuclide methods in medical practice with special reference to the assessment of medical technologies. Åbo akademi, 1989.

Janet, Comis, To Teresa, and Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment., eds. An Overview of major breast screening studies and their findings. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, 1992.

1946-, Ott David J., Wu Wallace C, and Geisinger Kim R, eds. Polypoid disease of the colon: Emphasis on radiologic evaluation. Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1986.

Wahner, Heinz W. The evaluation of osteoporosis: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice. Martin Dunitz, 1994.

National Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Evaluation: Spread the word about mammograms and the pap test. National Cancer Institute, 1999.

International Conference on Stress Evaluation in Materials Using Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation (4th 2007 Vienna, Austria). Stress evaluation in materials using neutrons and synchrotron radiation: Selected peer reviewed papers from the International Conference on Stress Evaluation in Materials Using Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation proceedings, Vienna, 24 - 26 September 2007. Trans Tech Publications, 2008.

International Conference on Stress Evaluation in Materials Using Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation (4th 2007 Vienna, Austria). Stress evaluation in materials using neutrons and synchrotron radiation: Selected peer reviewed papers from the International Conference on Stress Evaluation in Materials Using Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation proceedings, Vienna, 24 - 26 September 2007. Trans Tech Publications, 2008.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. A Review of computer aided interpretation technology for the evaluation of radiographs of alulminum welds. Martin Marietta Manned Space Systems, Advanced Quality Technology, 1989.

United States. General Accounting Office., ed. Screening mammography: Federal quality standards are needed : statement of Janet L. Shikles, Director, Health Financing and Policy Issues, Human Resources Division, before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives. The Office, 1992.

Shikles, Janet L. Screening mammography: Federal quality standards are needed : statement of Janet L. Shikles, Director, Health Financing and Policy Issues, Human Resources Division, before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives. The Office, 1992.

United States. General Accounting Office., ed. Screening mammography: Quality standards are needed in a developing market : statement of Janet L. Shikles. Director, Health Financing and Policy Issues, Human Resources Division, before the Subcommittee on Aging Committee on Labor and Human Resources United States Senate. The Office, 1991.

Ragnarsson, Jón Ingvar. Femoral neck fracture stability: Evaluation with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis, magnetic resonance imaging, scintimetry, radiography and histopathology. Univ., 1991.

A, Martinez Jorge, and Timberlake Gregory A, eds. Cervical spine trauma: Evaluation and acute management. Thieme Medical Publishers, 1989.

Chŏng, Chin-uk. Chungjaejŏk pangsasŏn punya esŏŭi hwanja pʻipʻok sŏllyang pʻyŏngka =: Evaluation of patient dose in interventional radiology. Sikpʻum Ŭiyakpʻum Anjŏnchʻŏng, 2007.

National Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Evaluación de los carteles: Corra la voz acerca de los mamogramas y el Papanicolaou. National Cancer Institute, 1999.

Group, Canada Health Canada Evaluation Indicators Working. Report from the Evaluation Indicators Working Group: Guidelines for monitoring breast screening program performance. Health Canada, 2002.

Canada. Health Canada. Evaluation Indicators Working Group. Report from the Evaluation Indicators Working Group: Guidelines for monitoring breast screening program performance. 2nd ed. Public Health Agency of Canada, 2007.

Jankovich, J. Consolidated guidance about materials licenses: Applications for sealed source and device evaluation and registration : final report. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 2015.

Lillie-Blanton, Marsha D. Mammography Quality Standards Act: X-ray quality improved, access unaffected, but impact on health outcomes unknown : statement of Marsha Lillie-Blanton, Associate Director, Health Services Quality and Public Health Issues, Health, Education, and Human Services Division, before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives. The Office, 1998.

Public Health Agency of Canada. Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control and Agence de santé publique du Canada. Centre de prévention et de contrôle des maladies chroniques, eds. Report from the evaluation indicators working group: Guidelines for monitoring breast screening program performance = Rapport du groupe de travail sur les indicateurs d'évaluation : lignes directrices pour la surveillance de la performance des programmes de dépistage du cancer du sein. 2nd ed. Public Health Agency of Canada = Agence de santé publique du Canada, 2007.

Helmrot, Ebba. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies (<150 keV): Relation to optical density : theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation. Munksgaard, 1996.

J, Dwyer Samuel, Jost R. Gilbert, Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers., and American Association of Physicists in Medicine., eds. Medical imaging IV.: 6-9 February 1990, Newport Beach, California. SPIE, 1990.

Lambrou, George N. Choroidal plerometry: A method for evaluating the choroidal blood supply in clinical practice. Kugler Publications, 1993.

Great Britain. Medical Devices Directorate., ed. Evaluation of specimen radiography cabinets: Reports on: MMI "Micro 50" MMI "Micro R" Hewlett-Packard "Faxitron" Soredex "Specimen DC", and three specimen containers also:Guidance notes for health authorities on specimen radiography cabinets and accessories for use during surgical and pathological procedures. Department of Health, Medical Devices Directorate, 1991.