Academic literature on the topic 'Rainfastness'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Rainfastness.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Rainfastness"
Symonds, Brett L., Christopher I. Lindsay, Niall R. Thomson, and Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy. "Chitosan as a rainfastness adjuvant for agrochemicals." RSC Advances 6, no. 104 (2016): 102206–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6ra23485b.
Full textRoggenbuck, Frank C., Loston Rowe, Donald Penner, Len Petroff, and Richard Burow. "Increasing Postemergence Herbicide Efficacy and Rainfastness with Silicone Adjuvants." Weed Technology 4, no. 3 (September 1990): 576–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00026002.
Full textReddy, Krishna N., and Megh Singh. "Organosilicone Adjuvant Effects on Glyphosate Efficacy and Rainfastness." Weed Technology 6, no. 2 (June 1992): 361–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00034874.
Full textSun, Jinxia, Chester L. Foy, and Harold L. Witt. "Effect of Organosilicone Surfactants on the Rainfastness of Primisulfuron in Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)." Weed Technology 10, no. 2 (June 1996): 263–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00039920.
Full textSpanoghe, Pieter, Johan Claeys, Luc Pinoy, and Walter Steurbaut. "Rainfastness and adsorption of herbicides on hard surfaces." Pest Management Science 61, no. 8 (2005): 793–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.1063.
Full textGaskin, R. E., D. W. L. Manktelow, and G. L. Northcott. "Effects of adjuvants on distribution and rainfastness of captan sprays on apple leaf scars to control European canker." New Zealand Plant Protection 67 (January 8, 2014): 139–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2014.67.5744.
Full textDagostin, Silvia, Tiziano Formolo, Oscar Giovannini, Ilaria Pertot, and Annegret Schmitt. "Salvia officinalis Extract Can Protect Grapevine Against Plasmopara viticola." Plant Disease 94, no. 5 (May 2010): 575–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/pdis-94-5-0575.
Full textBollig, J. J., J. R. Seiler, S. M. Zedaker, J. W. Thompson, and D. Lucero. "Effect of plant moisture stress and application surface on uptake and translocation of triclopyr with organosilicone surfactant in red maple seedlings." Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25, no. 3 (March 1, 1995): 425–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x95-047.
Full textNord, John C. "A Laboratory Rain Chamber for Testing Rainfastness of Insecticide Deposits." Journal of Entomological Science 26, no. 2 (April 1, 1991): 267–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-26.2.267.
Full textHulbert, Daniel, Pablo Reeb, Rufus Isaacs, Christine Vandervoort, Susan Erhardt, and John C. Wise. "Rainfastness of Insecticides Used to Control Japanese Beetle in Blueberries." Journal of Economic Entomology 105, no. 5 (October 1, 2012): 1688–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ec11412.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Rainfastness"
Symonds, Brett Laslo. "Investigating water-soluble polymers as rainfastness adjuvants for agrochemicals." Thesis, University of Reading, 2017. http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/77825/.
Full textOmar, Dzolkhifli. "Biological evaluation of effectiveness, persistence and rainfastness of permethrin spray droplets." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/47526.
Full textDebortoli, Monica Paula. "EFEITO DO RAINFASTNESS E ADJUVANTE NA APLICAÇÃO DE FUNGICIDAS FOLIARES EM CULTIVARES DE SOJA." Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2008. http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7498.
Full textDeposition, distribution and tenacity on the leaf surface can influence the efficacy of the fungicide. The effect of rainfall after the spray might run out fungicides of contact from leaf surface. It can also remove the systemic fungicides, if the spray occurs right after the fungicide application. The goals of this work were (i) performance of fungicides due to the drop spectrum under simulated conditions of rainfall on soybean rust control and (ii) determine the interference of rainfall on the biological efficacy of fungicides in different of soybean cultivars to control Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Two experiments were run out in greenhouse conditions. Experiment 1 studied three spray nozzles (twin flat spray - TJ60 11002; extended range flat spray - XR 11002 and wide angle flat spray - TT 11002), spray a fungicide with and without adjuvant, and four intervals of rain after spraying (0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes); two control treatments (without chemical spray and without rain). Experiment 2 rated the performance of four fungicides (Azoxystrobin + Cyproconazol; Pyraclostrobin + Epoxyconazol, Pycoxistrobin + Cyproconazol and Tebuconazol 250 EC) sprayed on seven cultivars (Coodetec 214 RR, Coodetec 219 RR, Monsoy 8000 RR, Monsoy 8080 RR, Fundacep 56 RR, FMT Tabarana and Nidera 7636 RR). Treatments were exposed to simulated rain at intervals of 0, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes after spray. The fungicides were sprayed with CO2 pressurized sprayer. The simulated rain produced a precipitation intensity of 20 mm/4min. The simulated rain caused negative effect on the performance of spraying nozzles and the effectiveness of Phakopsora pachyrhizi and powdery mildew control. Fungicide application with no addition of adjuvant affected the efficacy of soybean rust control due to the occurrence of rain immediately after the spraying. The drops produced by the nozzles XR showed the best drop deposition to the control of the soybean rust. In the absence of adjuvant it was observed less negative effect caused by the rain. When the adjuvant was added to the fungicide, it provided less control than the nozzle TT at 0 and 30 minutes after spraying. It was observed relationship between influences of the rainfastness on the efficiency of disease control provided by fungicides in different levels for the seven cultivars tested. The cultivars Msoy 8000 and Nidera 7636 were more showed higher product washing soon after spraying showing AUCPD superior to the other cultivars when sprayed azoxystrobin + cyproconazol. However the cultivars CD 214, CD 219 and FMT Tabarana suffered minor effect due to the rainfastness. It showed significant differences from the other cultivars as much to the final severity of rust as the AUCPD for the same fungicide. Occurrence of rain immediately after the spraying of pyraclostrobin + epoxyconazol was observed superiority in the disease control of the cultivars Cep 56, Nidera 7636 and CD 219 with smaller values of severity and final AUCPD. The efficiency of control of the fungicide pycoxistrobin + cyproconazol was less affected in cultivars Cep 56 and Nidera 7636 by rainfastness. The fungicide tebuconazol was little affected by rainfastness when sprayed in cultivars Cep 56 and CD 219, but in the CD 214 and Nidera 7636 was negative effect of rain. Yield per plant and weight of a thousand grains showed similar trend considering the final severity and AUCPD of the soybean rust.
A deposição, distribuição e tenacidade na superfície foliar influenciam a eficiência de um fungicida. A ação da chuva, logo após a pulverização, pode remover principalmente fungicidas de contato e também os sistêmicos das superfícies foliares das culturas. O presente trabalho teve por objetivos (i) avaliar o desempenho de pontas de pulverização no controle de doenças da soja em condições de chuva simulada e (ii) determinar impacto da chuva na eficiência biológica de fungicidas em variedades de soja para controle da ferrugem asiática. Foram instalados dois experimentos em casa de vegetação no município de Itaara/RS, no experimento 1 foram testadas três pontas de pulverização (jato plano duplo TJ60 11002; jato leque plano de uso ampliado XR 11002 e leque plano defletor TT 11002), um fungicida com e sem adjuvante e quatro intervalos de chuva após a aplicação (0, 30, 60 e 120 minutos); mais dois tratamentos testemunhas, uma sem controle químico e outra sem chuva. No experimento 2 foi avaliado o comportamento de quatro fungicidas (Azoxistrobina + Ciproconazol + Nimbus; Piraclostrobina + Epoxiconazol, Picoxistrobina + Ciproconazol + Nimbus e Tebuconazole 250 CE) aplicados em sete cultivares (Coodetec 214 RR, Coodetec 219 RR, Monsoy 8000 RR, Monsoy 8080 RR, Fundacep 56 RR, FMT Tabarana e Nidera 7636 RR) quando submetidos à chuva simulada aos 0, 30, 60, 120 e 240 minutos após a aplicação. A aplicação dos tratamentos fungicidas foi realizada com auxílio de pulverizador costal pressurizado à CO2. A chuva simulada foi obtida através de equipamento mecânico munido de aspersor Vejeet 80100, produzindo precipitação de intensidade de 20 mm. Os resultados obtidos mostraram que a chuva causou efeito negativo no desempenho das pontas de pulverização e na eficiência de controle de ferrugem asiática e oídio no experimento 1. Quando não foi utilizado adjuvante em combinação com o fungicida a eficiência de controle foi prejudicada pela ocorrência de chuva logo após a aplicação. A ponta XR apresentou o melhor desempenho no controle da ferrugem da soja quando sem adição de adjuvante, apresentando menor efeito negativo da chuva. Quando foi adicionado adjuvante à calda essa ponta proporcionou controle inferior a TT aos 0 e 30 minutos após a aplicação. No experimento 2 foi verificado que a rainfastness influenciou a eficiência de controle proporcionado pelos fungicidas, em diferentes magnitudes para as sete cultivares testadas. As cultivares Msoy 8000 e Nidera 7636 foram mais suscetíveis a lavagem do fungicida logo após a aplicação apresentando AACPF superior às demais cultivares quando aplicado Azoxistrobina + Ciproconazol, já as cultivares CD 214, CD 219 e FMT Tabarana foram as que sofreram menor impacto da rainfastness com diferenças significativas das outras cultivares tanto na severidade final da ferrugem como na AACPF para o mesmo fungicida. Com ocorrência de chuva logo após a aplicação de piraclostrobina + epoxiconazol foi observada superioridade no controle da doença nas cultivares Cep 56, Nidera 7636 e CD 219 que apresentaram menores valores de severidade final e AACPF. A eficiência de controle do fungicida picoxistrobina + ciproconazol foi menos afetada nas cultivares Cep 56 e Nidera 7636 pela rainfastness. O fungicida tebuconazol foi pouco afetado pela rainfastness quando aplicado nas cultivares Cep 56 e CD 219, já na CD 214 e Nidera 7636 ocorreu impacto negativo da chuva. Para peso de grãos por planta e peso de mil grãos foi observada a mesma tendência de resposta verificada para severidade final e AACP da ferrugem da soja.
Melo, Adriano Arrué. "INFLUÊNCIA DE ADJUVANTES NAS PROPRIEDADES FÍSICO-QUÍMICAS DA CALDA DE INSETICIDAS, NA FORMAÇÃO DE DEPÓSITOS, PENETRAÇÃO CUTICULAR E REMOÇÃO PELA CHUVA." Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2015. http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3630.
Full textThe addition of adjuvants can improve the quality of agricultural chemical sprays and have been an usual practice on the last years. The work presents two papers aiming to study the influence of adjuvant apply on the agricultural spray. The first article, entitled "Influence of adjuvants on the physicochemical characteristics of insecticides spray solution and electron microscope images of the deposits on wheat and corn leaves" evaluate changes in physical and chemical characteristics of the spray solution with the insecticides Thiamethoxam, Imidacloprid and Lambda-cyhalothrin. Were measured the surface tension, droplet contact angle on wheat and maize leaf, droplet coverage and images were made with a scanning electron microscope to better understand the deposit of these insecticides. Adjuvants alter the spray solution physical characteristics improving its wettability, furthermore, the addition of adjuvants may interfere with the deposit characteristics of the tested insecticides. The second article entitled "Tank-mix-adjuvants might improve deposit formation and cuticular penetration, and reduce rain-induced removal of chlorantraniliprole", aimed to verify the interaction of clorantraniliprole insecticide with commercial adjuvants. In this assay, have been studied aspects as adjuvant effect on the deposits formation, cuticular penetration through apple cuticles, droplet coverage and rain effect on the removal of the insecticide in wheat and maize crops. The results showed that the adjuvants play a crucial role in the hydrophobic cover sheet by changing the characteristics of the spray solution, thereby improving the wettability. Furthermore, adjuvants may enhance the absorption of clorantraniliprole insecticide.
A adição de adjuvantes pode melhorar a qualidade das pulverizações agrícolas e tem sido uma prática usual nos últimos anos. O presente trabalho apresenta dois artigos que tem como objetivo, estudar a influencia da utilização de adjuvantes nas pulverizações. O primeiro artigo, intitulado Influência de adjuvantes nas características físico-químicas de caldas de pulverização de inseticidas e imagens de microscópio eletrônico dos depósitos em folhas de trigo e milho avaliou as mudanças nas características físicas e químicas da calda de pulverização com os inseticidas tiametoxam, Imidacloprido e lambda-cialotrina. Sendo mensurada a tensão superficial, o ângulo de contato da gota, em folhas de trigo e milho, a cobertura de gotas e realizadas imagens com microscópio eletrônico de varredura. Os adjuvantes alteram as características físicas da calda, melhorando a sua molhabilidade, além disso, a adição de adjuvantes pode interferir nas características de formação do depósito dos inseticidas testados. O segundo artigo intitulado Tank-mix-adjuvants might improve deposit formation and cuticular penetration, and reduce rain-induced removal of chlorantraniliprole , objetivou verificar a interação do inseticida clorantraniliprole com adjuvantes comerciais. Foram estudados aspectos como efeito dos adjuvantes na formação dos depósitos, penetração cuticular, por meio de cutículas de maça, cobertura de gotas e efeito da chuva na remoção do inseticida, nas culturas do trigo e milho. Os resultados mostraram que os adjuvantes tem um papel essencial na cobertura de folhas hidrofóbicas, alterando as características da calda de pulverização e melhorando assim a molhabilidade da mesma. Além disso, se pode concluir que os adjuvantes podem melhorar a absorção do inseticida clorantraniliprole.
Silva, Kleber Batista da. "Toxicidade residual de inseticidas utilizados para Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) em milho e Chrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) em soja, e efeitos sobre o predador Doru luteipes (Dermaptera: Forficulidae)." Universidade de São Paulo, 2017. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11146/tde-22032018-132601/.
Full textChemical pest control for many agricultural crops is one of the main tactics in integrated pest management (IPM) programs, bringing real benefits and decreasing losses by pest insects, as well as increased food and fiber production, protection of stored products and protection of pests and diseases of humans. Pest control in soybean and corn has been mostly carried out using Bt plants and chemical products, for the latter, in addition to the several advantages cited, may have some disadvantages, especially when used improperly, with the potential to cause several problems in the agroecosystem, as well as environmental impacts. Owing to the importance of soybean and corn cultivation to Brazil and to the world, as a basis of animal and human feeding, recognizing the great use and role of insecticides as one of the main tactics used to control insect pests of these crops, it is necessary to study the best use of insecticides and studies that evaluate the possible adverse effects of these chemical molecules on beneficial insects, so that they are in accordance with the IPM premises. To enable this important control tactic, studies were carried out with the following objectives: 1) To study the residual toxicity of insecticides indoxacarb (Avatar®), chlorantraniliprole (Premio®), spinosad (Tracer®) and teflubenzuron (Nomolt 150®) for C. includens in soybeans, with and without rainfastness; 2) To study the residual toxicity of insecticides indoxacarb (Avatar®), chlorantraniliprole (Premio®), spinosad (Tracer®) and teflubenzuron (Nomolt 150®) for S. frugiperda in maize, with and without rainfastness; 3) To evaluate the lethal and sublethal effect of insecticides recommended for soybean and corn on the earwing predator Doru luteipes. For the first objective, teflubenzuron (15 g a. i. ha-1); spinosad (36 g a. i. ha-1); chlorantraniliprole (5, 10 and 20 g a. i. ha-1); indoxacarb (30, 60 and 90 g a. i. ha-1) were not affected when submitted to rainfastness at all evaluated times. Concerning for residual toxicity over time, teflubenzuron, chlorantraniliprole e indoxacarb, under both conditions, with and without rainfastness, had a reduction in efficacy after 5 day. In contrast, the insecticides spinosad (36 g a. i. ha-1) and indoxacarb (90 g a. i. ha-1), in both conditions had no efficacy reduction until 15 days after application and at all times evaluated were more effective than the other insecticides. For the second objective, spinosad (36 g a. i. ha-1) e chlorantraniliprole (10, 20 and 30 g a. i. ha-1) maintained efficacy until the 15th day after spraying. As for the effects of rainfastness, spinosad (36 g a. i. ha-1), chlorantraniliprole (10, 20 and 30 g a. i. ha-1) and indoxacarb (90 g a. i. ha-1) remained effective. The insecticide chlorantraniliprole at the highest dose used and recommended for the control of the pest in the crop was the most effective of all, regarding residual toxicity and under the action of the rainfastness. About the third objective, lethal effect bioassay, Tracer, Premio e Avatar were classified as harmful (class 4), and only Nomolt was innocuous (class 1). In the test of sublethal effect, just the insecticide Nomolt had parameters evaluated. Nevertheless, it caused adverse effects to the predator, such as: increased pre-oviposition period; increase in the embryonic period and decrease in fecundity; therefore, it is not recommended for use in IPM programs, because it modify the developmental and reproductive capacity of predatory earwings. The results obtained in these studies provided important information for the refinement of the use of insecticidal molecules and the classification of these as the selectivity to the generalist predator D. luteipes, adding practical information for pest management in soybean and corn crops.
Oliveira, Maria Aparecida Peres de [UNESP]. "Remoção pela chuva de diferentes formulações de flutriafol aplicada em soja, com e sem a adição de óleo mineral na calda." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/101763.
Full textOutros
O presente trabalho teve por objetivos verificar o efeito da remoção pela chuva de diferentes formulações de flutriafol, em condições de laboratório, aplicadas com e sem a adição de óleo na calda de pulverização, assim como verificar a influencia do óleo no espectro de gotas. O experimento considerou dez caldas resultantes da interação de cinco tratamentos contendo o flutriafol (quatro formulações de flutriafol isolado e uma mistura de flutriafol com tebuconazole), todas aplicadas com e sem óleo mineral. As dez caldas foram aplicadas sobre plantas de soja que receberam posteriormente lavagem por chuva simulada em laboratório com quatro intervalos de tempo entre a aplicação e a chuva. As chuvas foram simuladas em duas etapas, sendo uma lâmina inicial de 5 mm seguida de uma lâmina complementar de 15 mm. As coletas foram realizadas com quatro repetições, sendo cada uma delas constituída de um vaso com quatro plantas. A avaliação da concentração de flutriafol nas soluções resultantes da lavagem das plantas foi realizada através da quantificação dos resíduos do fungicida na água pelo método de cromatografia gasosa e espectrometria de massa (GCMS). Após a aplicação das caldas, as plantas foram retiradas do laboratório e deixadas à temperatura ambiente, a espera do tempo decorrido para a simulação da chuva, de acordo com cada tratamento. Após a simulação das lâminas de chuva as plantas foram cortadas dos vasos e lavadas em saco plástico contendo 200 mL de água destilada. Todas as lavagens foram realizadas em 4 intervalos: 0 h (no momento da aplicação), 1 h, 2 h e 48 h após a aplicação. Para o cálculo do percentual extraído, as quantidades de flutriafol nas soluções de lavagem foram comparadas à quantidade total depositada nas plantas, a qual foi representada...
The present study had for objectives to verify the effect of rainfastness of different flutriafol formulations, in laboratory conditions, applied with and without the oil adjuvant in the spray solution, as well as to verify the influence of the oil on the droplet spectrum. The experiment considered ten spray solutions related to five treatments containing flutriafol (four formulations of flutriafol and a flutriafol mixture with tebuconazole), all applied with and without mineral oil. The ten solutions were applied on soybean plants that were washed by simulated rainfall in laboratory with four time intervals between the application and the rainfall. Rainfall was simulated by one initial precipitation of 5 mm followed by a complementary 15 mm rainfall. Each vase with four plants was considered one replication. The washing solutions from the vases were collected and the flutriafol concentration on those solutions was evaluated through the quantification of the residues of the fungicide in the water using the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). After the spray application the plants were removed of the laboratory and left to room temperature, the wait of the time elapsed for the simulation of the rain, in agreement with each treatment.After the simulated rain the plants were cut out of the vases and washed by immersion in plastic sack containing 200 mL of distilled water. All of the washing solutions (from the rain and the immersion process) were accomplished in 4 intervals: 0 h (in the moment of the spray application), 1 h, 2 h and 48 h after the application. For the calculation of the flutriafol extracted, the amounts of fungicide in the wash solutions were compared to the total amount deposited in the plants, which was represented by the sum of the amounts of the assets recovered in the washing... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Sun, Jinxia. "Characterization of Organosilicone Surfactants and Their Effects on Sulfonylurea Herbicide Activity." Diss., Virginia Tech, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30343.
Full textPh. D.
Oliveira, Maria Aparecida Peres de 1981. "Remoção pela chuva de diferentes formulações de flutriafol aplicada em soja, com e sem a adição de óleo mineral na calda /." Botucatu : [s.n.], 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/101763.
Full textBanca: Otavio Jorge Grigoli Abi Saab
Banca: Marco Antonio Gandolfo
Banca: Edivaldo Domingues Velini
Banca: Wellington P.A.de Carvalho
Resumo: O presente trabalho teve por objetivos verificar o efeito da remoção pela chuva de diferentes formulações de flutriafol, em condições de laboratório, aplicadas com e sem a adição de óleo na calda de pulverização, assim como verificar a influencia do óleo no espectro de gotas. O experimento considerou dez caldas resultantes da interação de cinco tratamentos contendo o flutriafol (quatro formulações de flutriafol isolado e uma mistura de flutriafol com tebuconazole), todas aplicadas com e sem óleo mineral. As dez caldas foram aplicadas sobre plantas de soja que receberam posteriormente lavagem por chuva simulada em laboratório com quatro intervalos de tempo entre a aplicação e a chuva. As chuvas foram simuladas em duas etapas, sendo uma lâmina inicial de 5 mm seguida de uma lâmina complementar de 15 mm. As coletas foram realizadas com quatro repetições, sendo cada uma delas constituída de um vaso com quatro plantas. A avaliação da concentração de flutriafol nas soluções resultantes da lavagem das plantas foi realizada através da quantificação dos resíduos do fungicida na água pelo método de cromatografia gasosa e espectrometria de massa (GCMS). Após a aplicação das caldas, as plantas foram retiradas do laboratório e deixadas à temperatura ambiente, a espera do tempo decorrido para a simulação da chuva, de acordo com cada tratamento. Após a simulação das lâminas de chuva as plantas foram cortadas dos vasos e lavadas em saco plástico contendo 200 mL de água destilada. Todas as lavagens foram realizadas em 4 intervalos: 0 h (no momento da aplicação), 1 h, 2 h e 48 h após a aplicação. Para o cálculo do percentual extraído, as quantidades de flutriafol nas soluções de lavagem foram comparadas à quantidade total depositada nas plantas, a qual foi representada... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo)
Abstract : The present study had for objectives to verify the effect of rainfastness of different flutriafol formulations, in laboratory conditions, applied with and without the oil adjuvant in the spray solution, as well as to verify the influence of the oil on the droplet spectrum. The experiment considered ten spray solutions related to five treatments containing flutriafol (four formulations of flutriafol and a flutriafol mixture with tebuconazole), all applied with and without mineral oil. The ten solutions were applied on soybean plants that were washed by simulated rainfall in laboratory with four time intervals between the application and the rainfall. Rainfall was simulated by one initial precipitation of 5 mm followed by a complementary 15 mm rainfall. Each vase with four plants was considered one replication. The washing solutions from the vases were collected and the flutriafol concentration on those solutions was evaluated through the quantification of the residues of the fungicide in the water using the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). After the spray application the plants were removed of the laboratory and left to room temperature, the wait of the time elapsed for the simulation of the rain, in agreement with each treatment.After the simulated rain the plants were cut out of the vases and washed by immersion in plastic sack containing 200 mL of distilled water. All of the washing solutions (from the rain and the immersion process) were accomplished in 4 intervals: 0 h (in the moment of the spray application), 1 h, 2 h and 48 h after the application. For the calculation of the flutriafol extracted, the amounts of fungicide in the wash solutions were compared to the total amount deposited in the plants, which was represented by the sum of the amounts of the assets recovered in the washing... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Doutor
Leung, John Wing. "Role of Ethomeen® T/25 and Silwet® L-77 adjuvants on rainfastness of herbicide formulation of Vision® for the control of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.)." 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/18526.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Rainfastness"
Woelfle-Gupta, Caroline, Selvanathan Arumugam, Daniel Saucy, Bolatito Ajayi, Yujing Tan, Susan Jordan, Jeff Coles, and Aslin Izmitli. "Improved Rainfastness and UV Resistance of Microbial Pesticides." In Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 40th Volume, Formulation, Application and Adjuvant Innovation, 152–61. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959: ASTM International, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/stp162720190117.
Full textSundaram, Kanth M. S. "Photostability and Rainfastness of Tebufenozide Deposits on Fir Foliage." In Biorational Pest Control Agents, 134–52. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-1995-0595.ch009.
Full textLu, Wei, Ling Zhong, and Caroline Woelfle-Gupta. "Sticker Adjuvant Development with Enhanced Performance in Rainfastness and Efficacy." In Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 40th Volume, Formulation, Application and Adjuvant Innovation, 162–76. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959: ASTM International, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/stp162720190111.
Full textKudsk, Per. "The Effect of Adjuvants on the Rainfastness of Thifensulfuron and Tribenuron." In Adjuvants for Agrichemicals, 441–48. CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351069502-42.
Full textThonke, K. E., P. Kudsk, and J. C. Streibig. "The Effect of Adjuvants on the Rainfastness of Glyphosate Applied on Quackgrass (Elymus Repens)." In Adjuvants and Agrochemicals, 103–10. CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351069496-11.
Full text