Relevant bibliographies by topics / Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541)

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541)'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 27 July 2024
Last updated: 31 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541)"

1

Jensen, Gordon A. "The 1541 Colloquy at Regensburg: In Pursuit of Church Unityby Suzanne Hequet." Dialog 51, no. 4 (2012): 347–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6385.2012.00714.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bellusci, David. "Dialogue and Clash: Gasparo Contarini and the Colloquy of Regensburg of 1541." Philosophy, Culture, and Traditions 6 (2010): 51–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pct201065.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Blumenthal, Geoffrey. "Copernicus's Publication Strategy in the Contexts of Imperial and Papal Censorship and of Warmian Diplomatic Precedents." Science in Context 29, no. 2 (2016): 151–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0269889716000016.

Full text
Abstract:
ArgumentThe main thesis of this paper is that Copernicus's avoidance of all admission that scripture was contravened inDe revolutionibusand his composition of its new Preface in 1542, as well as the non-publication of Rheticus'sTreatise on Holy Scripture and the Motion of the Earth, were influenced by the early information they received on the failure of the 1541 Regensburg Protestant-Catholic colloquy, among the major consequences of which were significant increases in the problems concerning publishing works which contravened scripture. This is supported by examining Rheticus's first letter
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lane, Anthony N. S. "Why was Luther Hostile to Article 5 on Justification Agreed at the Religious Colloquy of Regensburg, 1541?" Reformation & Renaissance Review 22, no. 2 (2020): 112–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1767326.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wengert, Timothy J. "Caspar Cruciger Sr.'s 1546 “Enarratio” on John's Gospel: An Experiment in Ecclesiological Exegesis." Church History 61, no. 1 (1992): 60–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3168003.

Full text
Abstract:
Only months after Luther's death in 1546, a colleague, Caspar Cruciger, Sr., published his magnum opus, an 879-page commentary on the Gospel of John, In Evangelium Iohannis Apostoli Enarratio. Cruciger's Enarratio provides an excellent angle from which scholars may examine an important shift in Wittenberg's exegesis and theology during the crucial decade of the 1540s. To be sure, this work has few of the characteristics of other treatments of the fourth Gospel produced near the same time. The exposition of the four Gospels by Cologne's Franciscan theologian, von Konigstein, underwent far more
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gaetano, Matthew. "Original Sin and the Colloquy of Regensburg." Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology, April 3, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512251329054.

Full text
Abstract:
The agreement on original sin at the Colloquy of Regensburg has not generated as much attention as the agreement on justification. Protestant theologians saw their teaching on the remnants of original sin in the baptized as fundamental to understanding justification by faith alone and the imputation of Christ's righteousness. Roman Catholics condemned the Protestant view of the remnants of original sin as undermining the work of Christ, the sacrament of baptism, and the good works of Christians. The background and aftermath of the agreement about original sin in 1541 make this remarkable achie
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gaetano, Matthew. "Translation of Articles 1-4 of the Colloquy of Regensburg." Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology, April 3, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512251329045.

Full text
Abstract:
Before the famous agreement about justification at the Colloquy of Regensburg in 1541, major Protestant and Roman Catholic theologians agreed to statements about humanity’s condition before the fall, free choice, the cause of sin, and original sin. The translation of these four articles sheds light on the shape of theological controversy—and the possibility of shared language and even genuine agreement—about the creation, fall, and redemption of mankind. Annotations to the translation provide an account of later controversies about specific passages in the Regensburg agreement. Johann Eck, one
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541)"

1

Lugioyo, Brian. "Martin Bucer's Doctrine of Justification and the Colloquy of Regensburg 1541." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2007. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk/R?func=search-advanced-go&find_code1=WSN&request1=AAIU234678.

Full text
Abstract:
Martin Bucer has been predominantly portrayed as a diplomat, who attempted to reconcile divergent theological views, sometimes at any costs, or as a pragmatic pastor, who was more concerned with ethics than theology. These representations have influenced the view that Bucer was a theological light-weight, a Vermittlungstheologe, rightly placed in the shadow of Luther and Calvin. This thesis argues differently. Bucer was an ecclesial diplomat and he was a pragmatic pastor, yet his ecclesial and practical approaches to reforming the church were guided by coherent theological convictions. Central
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541)"

1

Jäger, Norbert. Das Regensburger Religionsgespräch (1541). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Viallon, Marie F. Italie 1541, ou, l'unité perdue de l'Eglise. CNRS, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Paas, S. A conflict on the church and the sacraments: How Rome and the reformation differed at Regensburg in 1541. Kachere Series, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cardinal Contarini at Regensburg. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Das zweite Regensburger Religionsgespräch von 1546: Politik und Theologie zwischen Konsensdruck und Selbstbehauptung. Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

The 1541 Colloquy at Regensburg: In pursuit of church unity. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Regensburg Article 5 on Justification: Inconsistent Patchwork or Substance of True Doctrine? Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lane, Anthony N. S. The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1541 at the Regensburg Colloquy, three leading Protestant theologians (Melanchthon, Bucer, and Pistorius) and three leading Catholic theologians (Eck, Gropper, and Pflug) debated with the aim of producing a commonly agreed statement of belief. The colloquy eventually failed, but it had begun with a statement on justification by faith agreed by all the parties, “Article 5,” leading to an initial burst of optimism. But from the beginning, there were two contrasting reactions to Article 5. Some, like Calvin, maintained that it contained the substance of true doctrine; others, like Luther, call
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Ratisbon, Colloquy of (1541)"

1

Rady, Martyn. "The Colloquy of Regensburg (1541)." In The Emperor Charles V. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315839752-16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Nouveaux Développements Colloque et Diète de Ratisbonne (avril–juillet 1541)." In Julius Pflug (1499-1564) et la crise religieuse dans l'Allemagne du XVIe siècle. BRILL, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004476929_011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Carbonnier-Burkard, Marianne. "Le colloque religieux de Ratisbonne (1541) traduit par Calvin pour les Français." In Les dialogues interreligieux. Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.166197.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lane, Anthony N. S. "Introduction." In The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1541, at the Regensburg Colloquy, three leading Protestant theologians (Melanchthon, Bucer, and Pistorius) and three leading Catholic theologians (Eck, Gropper, and Pflug) debated with the aim of producing a joint statement of belief. The colloquy eventually failed, but it began with a statement on justification by faith agreed by all the parties, “Article 5,” which had led to an initial burst of optimism. But from the beginning there were two contrasting reactions to Article 5. Some, notably Calvin, maintained that it contained the substance of true doctrine; others, notably Luther, called
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lane, Anthony N. S. "After Regensburg." In The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter sets out the ongoing debates over justification in the aftermath of Article 5. From 1541 to 1543 Bucer engaged in a literary controversy over the article with Eck and Pighius. There followed the controversy surrounding the attempted Cologne Reformation, in which Bucer (and to a lesser extent Melanchthon) engaged in a literary exchange with Gropper especially. This involved disputes about the events surrounding Article 5, as well as the theological issues arising from it, such as twofold righteousness and imputed righteousness. Gropper also had to respond to criticisms from the Leu
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography