Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Rejection sensitivity / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Rejection sensitivity.

Journal articles on the topic 'Rejection sensitivity'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 20 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Rejection sensitivity.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Dorfman, Anna, Harrison Oakes, and Igor Grossmann. "Rejection Sensitivity Hurts Your Open Mind: Rejection Sensitivity and Wisdom in Workplace Conflicts." Academy of Management Proceedings 2020, no. 1 (August 2020): 20479. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.20479abstract.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Richter, Marianne, and Dominik Schoebi. "Rejection Sensitivity in Intimate Relationships." Zeitschrift für Psychologie 229, no. 3 (September 2021): 165–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000448.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract. The goal of the study was to investigate whether and how perceptions of rejection are predictive of perceptions of the partner’s responsiveness, and the intimacy felt with a romantic partner, daily. Moreover, we examined whether people who are more anxious and sensitive to rejection perceived more rejection in daily life and whether this foreshadowed perception of the partner to be less responsive. Analyses of daily data from a sample of 75 couples ( N = 150) who reported on their daily relational experiences suggest that rejection sensitivity and rejection experiences play a significant role in couples’ felt intimacy in daily life, and specifically for perceptions of responsiveness. Results also indicate that for women, rejection sensitivity is associated with more rejection experiences. We discuss the current results from a clinical and from a social psychological perspective, and we highlight how anxious apprehension and experience of rejection, and its interpersonal consequences, can be further considered in clinical practice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Anna, Li, and Zhao Junyan. "A Review on Rejection Sensitivity." Psychology of China 4, no. 1 (2022): 82–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.35534/pc.0401011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Kross, Ethan, Tobias Egner, Kevin Ochsner, Joy Hirsch, and Geraldine Downey. "Neural Dynamics of Rejection Sensitivity." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, no. 6 (June 2007): 945–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.945.

Full text

Abstract:

Rejection sensitivity (RS) is the tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to rejection. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore whether individual differences in RS are mediated by differential recruitment of brain regions involved in emotional appraisal and/or cognitive control. High and low RS participants were scanned while viewing either representational paintings depicting themes of rejection and acceptance or nonrepresentational control paintings matched for positive or negative valence, arousal and interest level. Across all participants, rejection versus acceptance images activated regions of the brain involved in processing affective stimuli (posterior cingulate, insula), and cognitive control (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; medial frontal cortex). Low and high RS individuals' responses to rejection versus acceptance images were not, however, identical. Low RS individuals displayed significantly more activity in left inferior and right dorsal frontal regions, and activity in these areas correlated negatively with participants' self-report distress ratings. In addition, control analyses revealed no effect of viewing negative versus positive images in any of the areas described above, suggesting that the aforementioned activations were involved in rejection-relevant processing rather than processing negatively valenced stimuli per se. Taken together, these findings suggest that responses in regions traditionally implicated in emotional processing and cognitive control are sensitive to rejection stimuli irrespective of RS, but that low RS individuals may activate prefrontal structures to regulate distress associated with viewing such images.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

McLachlan, Julie, Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck, and Leanne McGregor. "Rejection Sensitivity in Childhood and Early Adolescence: Peer Rejection and Protective Effects of Parents and Friends." Journal of Relationships Research 1, no. 1 (November 1, 2010): 31–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/jrr.1.1.31.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractTheory suggests that rejection sensitivity, a social cognitive processing style characterised by anxious and angry expectations of rejection, develops from experiences of rejection or acceptance by others. The purpose of this study of 417 children and early adolescents (age 9 to 13) was to examine how relationship experiences are directly and interactively associated with their rejection sensitivity. In a multivariate analysis, there was an association of rejection by parents and by peers with rejection sensitivity, with a stronger association between peer rejection and sensitivity than between parent rejection and sensitivity. Regarding interactive effects, peer rejection was found to have a strong association with rejection sensitivity among participants with low or high parent acceptance, and among those with high friendship satisfaction. Yet, there was evidence of a stronger association between peer rejection and rejection sensitivity among those with low parent acceptance or high friendship quality. This was because rejection sensitivity was highest when peer rejection was high and parent acceptance was low, and sensitivity was lowest when peer rejection was low and friendship quality was high. Findings show how young people's relationships in different domains uniquely co-vary with rejection sensitivity and interact in accounting for angry and anxious expectations of rejection by others.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Petereit, Pauline, Sarah Jessen, Tatiana Goregliad Fjaellingsdal, and Ulrike M. Krämer. "Social Context and Rejection Expectations Modulate Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Feedback." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 34, no. 5 (March 31, 2022): 823–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01829.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract When meeting other people, some are optimistic and expect to be accepted by others, whereas others are pessimistic and expect mostly rejections. How social feedback is evaluated in situations that meet or do not meet these biases and how people differ in their response to rejection and acceptance depending on the social situation are unknown. In this study, participants experienced rejection and acceptance by peers in two different social contexts, one with high (negative context) and the other with low probability of rejection (positive context). We examined how the neural and behavioral responses to rejection are altered by this context and whether it depends on the individual's sensitivity to rejection. Behavioral results show that, on average, people maintain an optimistic bias even when mostly experiencing rejection. Importantly, personality differences in rejection sensitivity affected both prior expectations to be rejected in the paradigm and the extent to which expectations changed during the paradigm. The context also strongly modulated ERPs and theta responses to rejection and acceptance feedback. Specifically, valence effects on neural responses were enhanced in the negative context, suggesting a greater relevance to monitor social feedback in such a situation. Moreover, midfrontal theta predicted how expectations were changed in response to prediction errors, stressing a role for theta in learning from social feedback. Surprisingly, interindividual differences in rejection sensitivity did not affect neural responses to feedback. Our results stress the importance of considering the interaction between subjective expectations and the social context for behavioral and neural responses to social rejection.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Kraines, Morganne A., Lucas J. A. Kelberer, and Tony T. Wells. "Rejection sensitivity, interpersonal rejection, and attention for emotional facial expressions." Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 59 (June 2018): 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.11.004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Romero-Canyas, Rainer, Geraldine Downey, Kathy Berenson, Ozlem Ayduk, and N. Jan Kang. "Rejection Sensitivity and the Rejection-Hostility Link in Romantic Relationships." Journal of Personality 78, no. 1 (February 2010): 119–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Nesdale, Drew, Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck, and Natalie Roxburgh. "Peer Group Rejection in Childhood: Effects of Rejection Ambiguity, Rejection Sensitivity, and Social Acumen." Journal of Social Issues 70, no. 1 (March 2014): 12–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12044.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Downey, Geraldine, Amy Lebolt, Claudia Rincón, and Antonio L. Freitas. "Rejection Sensitivity and Children's Interpersonal Difficulties." Child Development 69, no. 4 (August 1998): 1074–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06161.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Pearson, Katherine A., Edward R. Watkins, and Eugene G. Mullan. "Rejection sensitivity prospectively predicts increased rumination." Behaviour Research and Therapy 49, no. 10 (October 2011): 597–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Downey, Geraldine, Amy Lebolt, Claudia Rincon, and Antonio L. Freitas. "Rejection Sensitivity and Children's Interpersonal Difficulties." Child Development 69, no. 4 (August 1998): 1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1132363.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Staebler, Katja, Esther Helbing, Charlotte Rosenbach, and Babette Renneberg. "Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder." Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 18, no. 4 (May 25, 2010): 275–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.705.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

M. Hamza, Hanan, and Shaima S. Hussein Al.Obaidy. "Rejection sensitivity of middle school students." Al-Anbar University Journal For Humanities 2022, no. 2 (June 1, 2022): 1963–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.37653/juah.2022.174789.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Murphy, Anna M., and Gemma Russell. "Rejection Sensitivity, Jealousy, and the Relationship to Interpersonal Aggression." Journal of Interpersonal Violence 33, no. 13 (January 21, 2016): 2118–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260515622572.

Full text

Abstract:

The development and maintenance of interpersonal relationships lead individuals to risk rejection in the pursuit of acceptance. Some individuals are predisposed to experience a hypersensitivity to rejection that is hypothesized to be related to jealous and aggressive reactions within interpersonal relationships. The current study used convenience sampling to recruit 247 young adults to evaluate the relationship between rejection sensitivity, jealousy, and aggression. A mediation model was used to test three hypotheses: Higher scores of rejection sensitivity would be positively correlated to higher scores of aggression (Hypothesis 1); higher scores of rejection sensitivity would be positively correlated to higher scores of jealousy (Hypothesis 2); jealousy would mediate the relationship between rejection sensitivity and aggression (Hypothesis 3). Study results suggest a tendency for individuals with high rejection sensitivity to experience higher levels of jealousy, and subsequently have a greater propensity for aggression, than individuals with low rejection sensitivity. Future research that substantiates a link between hypersensitivity to rejection, jealousy, and aggression may provide an avenue for prevention, education, or intervention in reducing aggression within interpersonal relationships.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Nolan, Niamh, Katherine Valdivieso, Rekha Mani, Joshua Y. C. Yang, Reuben D. Sarwal, Phoebe Katzenbach, Kavita Chalasani, et al. "Clinical and Analytical Validation of a Novel Urine-Based Test for the Detection of Allograft Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients." Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 8 (July 22, 2020): 2325. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082325.

Full text

Abstract:

In this clinical validation study, we developed and validated a urinary Q-Score generated from the quantitative test QSant, formerly known as QiSant, for the detection of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in kidney transplants. Using a cohort of 223 distinct urine samples collected from three independent sites and from both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients, we examined the diagnostic utility of the urinary Q-Score for detection of acute rejection in renal allografts. Statistical models based upon the measurements of the six QSant biomarkers (cell-free DNA, methylated-cell-free DNA, clusterin, CXCL10, creatinine, and total protein) generated a renal transplant Q-Score that reliably differentiated stable allografts from acute rejections in both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients. The composite Q-Score was able to detect both T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection patients and differentiate them from stable non-rejecting patients with a receiver–operator characteristic curve area under the curve of 99.8% and an accuracy of 98.2%. Q-Scores < 32 indicated the absence of active rejection and Q-Scores ≥ 32 indicated an increased risk of active rejection. At the Q-Score cutoff of 32, the overall sensitivity was 95.8% and specificity was 99.3%. At a prevalence of 25%, positive and negative predictive values for active rejection were 98.0% and 98.6%, respectively. The Q-Score also detected subclinical rejection in patients without an elevated serum creatinine level but identified by a protocol biopsy. This study confirms that QSant is an accurate and quantitative measurement suitable for routine monitoring of renal allograft status.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Ayduk, Özlem, Anett Gyurak, and Anna Luerssen. "Rejection Sensitivity Moderates the Impact of Rejection on Self-Concept Clarity." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35, no. 11 (August 27, 2009): 1467–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209343969.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Park, Lora E., and Melissa J. Harwin. "Visible versus non-visible rejection: Consequences of appearance-based rejection sensitivity." Journal of Research in Personality 44, no. 1 (February 2010): 128–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Breines, Juliana G., and Ozlem Ayduk. "Rejection Sensitivity and Vulnerability to Self-Directed Hostile Cognitions Following Rejection." Journal of Personality 83, no. 1 (December 20, 2013): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12077.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Slimowicz, Joseph, Jedidiah Siev, and Paula M. Brochu. "Impact of Status-Based Rejection Sensitivity on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Gay Men." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 5 (February 28, 2020): 1546. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051546.

Full text

Abstract:

Status-based rejection sensitivity refers to the anxious expectation and tendency to perceive rejection in ambiguous social scenarios based on one’s minority identification. This study evaluates the implications of sensitivity to rejection based on sexual orientation identity on negative mental health outcomes. Current minority stress models include rejection sensitivity as a factor that may contribute to adverse negative psychosocial outcomes in LGBT persons. This study evaluates the role of rejection sensitivity alongside demographically relevant predictors such as age, race, education, and level of sexuality disclosure in predicting the presence of significant depression and anxiety scores among a sample of gay men. Results indicate that rejection sensitivity, sexuality openness, and anxiety were significant predictors of depression symptoms, whereas age and depression were significant predictors of anxiety symptoms. This study supports the role of rejection sensitivity as a contributor to negative mental health outcomes among gay men, particularly as it pertains to internalizing mental health disorders.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Erozkan, Atilgan. "Rejection sensitivity levels with respect to attachment styles, gender, and parenting styles: A study with Turkish students." Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 37, no. 1 (February 1, 2009): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.1.1.

Full text

Abstract:

The effects of attachment styles of a group of university students on their rejection sensitivity levels in relation to gender, and parenting styles were investigated. Instruments used were the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (Downey & Feldman, 1996), and the Relationship Scales Questionnaire (Griffin & Bartholomew, 1994). To analyze data, F statistics, t test, regression analysis, and correlation analysis were employed. Rejection sensitivity levels of female students who had fearful attachment styles and of students who experienced authoritarian parenting styles were found to be significantly higher than those of others. Effect of attachment styles on rejection sensitivity and relationship between rejection sensitivity and attachment styles were both found to be significant.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Brekalo, Maja, and Gordana Keresteš. "The Moderating Role of Gender in the Relation Between Rejection Sensitivity and Depressive Symptoms in Early Adulthood." Drustvena istrazivanja 31, no. 2 (July 14, 2022): 193–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5559/di.31.2.01.

Full text

Abstract:

Previous studies showed that rejection sensitivity is a predictor of depressive symptoms. However, it is not clear whether gender is a moderator in this relation. This study aims to longitudinally examine the contribution of rejection sensitivity to depressive symptoms in university students and the moderating role of gender in that relation. A longitudinal research with a two-wave data collection five months apart included 277 students (53 male) aged between 18 and 29 years. The results showed that, controlling for the initial level of depressive symptoms, rejection sensitivity predicted the level of depressive symptoms after five months in female but not in male students. Females with higher rejection sensitivity showed higher increase in depressive symptoms in a five- -month period than females with lower rejection sensitivity. The results for females are in line with the rejection sensitivity theory, while the results for males require further research.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Kolcheva, Nadya. "Rejection Sensitivity in Adulthood and Its Relationship with Perceived Parental Acceptance–Rejection in Childhood." Diogenes 30, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 99–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.54664/htgg1443.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this article is to investigate the relationships between perceived maternal and paternal acceptance–rejection in childhood on the one hand, and rejection sensitivity in adulthood on the other hand. The sample consisted of 300 adults: 59 males (19.7%) and 241 females (80.3%) aged 18–49 (M = 34.33; SD = 10.475). The means used for collecting the data included a Parental Acceptance- Rejection Questionnaire/Control, Adult, Mother and Father Version, and the Interpersonal Rejection Sensitivity Scale. The results showed that adults’ remembrance regarding perceived maternal and paternal acceptance-rejection during childhood had a significant correlation with their current level of rejection sensitivity. We examined two age groups (early and middle adulthood), and there were significant age differences. The relationship between perceived parental rejection and rejection sensitivity was stronger in younger participants than in older ones. These results were interpreted within the framework of IPARTheory.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Aisyah, Betari, and Jony Eko Yulianto. "Pengaruh Agama Sebagai Identitas Sosial Terhadap Rejection Sensitivity Pada Mahasiswa Beragama Minoritas." Psychopreneur Journal 2, no. 1 (July 15, 2019): 19–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.37715/psy.v2i1.864.

Full text

Abstract:

Rejection Sensitivity memiliki sejarah panjang sebagai pencetus berbagai fenomena konflik antarkelompok sosial di kancah global maupun nasional. Rejection Sensitivity merupakan reaksi antisipatif yang bersifat defensif bahkan agresif ketika individu merasa identitas sosialnya ditolak oleh lingkungan. Di antara berbagai jenis identitas sosial, agama merupakan identitas sosial primer yang memiliki kekuatan sebagai identitas sekaligus sistem kepercayaan yang tidak terfalsifikasi menurut masing-masing penganutnya, sehingga sangat rentan mengalami dampak Rejection Sensitivity. Anggota identitas sosial minoritas merupakan pihak yang ditemukan lebih rentan mengalami rejection sensitivity dibandingkan mayoritas dalam konteks kontak antarkelompok. Penelitian ini melibatkan 195 mahasiswa beragama minoritas di salah satu universitas swasta di Surabaya sebagai representasi penganut Islam, Hindu, dan Buddha, serta satu universitas negeri di Malang sebagai representasi penganut Kristen dan Katolik. Berdasarkan analisis multiple hierarchichal regression, identitas sosial agama bukanlah prediktor rejection sensitivity yang signifikan. Namun, jika diinteraksikan sebagai prediktor bersama-sama dengan Kategori Bidang Studi, model regresi menjadi signifikan memprediksi Rejection Sensitivity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Di Pierro, Rossella, Sara Amelio, Martina Macca, Fabio Madeddu, and Marco Di Sarno. "What If I Feel Rejected? Borderline Personality, Pathological Narcissism, and Social Rejection in Daily Life." Journal of Personality Disorders 36, no. 5 (October 2022): 559–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2022.36.5.559.

Full text

Abstract:

The authors investigate whether and how borderline and pathological narcissistic traits differ in their associations with trait and state rejection sensitivity, and with affective reactions to experiences of social rejection occurring in daily life. Community adults (N = 189) completed baseline measures of rejection sensitivity, borderline personality, and pathological narcissism, and daily measures of perceived social rejection and affective states for 7 days. Vulnerable narcissism was the main driver of negative anticipated emotions for social rejection. Borderline personality made people prone to experiencing social rejection in daily life. Moreover, borderline personality traits predicted greater self-directed aggressive impulses when experiencing social rejection. Grandiose narcissism showed only a negative association with anticipatory anxiety for rejection. These findings highlight that sensitivity to social rejection is crucial in both borderline personality and pathological narcissism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Godleski, Stephanie A., Rina D. Eiden, Lorig Kachadourian, and Joseph F. Lucke. "Etiological Pathways to Rejection Sensitivity in a High-Risk Sample." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 45, no. 5 (September 21, 2018): 715–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167218795486.

Full text

Abstract:

Rejection sensitivity is associated with social–emotional maladjustment in both childhood and adulthood. However, less is known about the etiology of rejection sensitivity. The present study tests an etiological model for rejection sensitivity using a high-risk sample ( N = 227) with prospective data from infancy (i.e., 12 months) to adolescence (i.e., eighth grade). Evidence for social learning and attachment theories was demonstrated. In particular, family and parenting factors, such as family conflict and maternal harshness, were predictive of rejection sensitivity in adolescence. Implications for intervention and prevention efforts are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Feldman, Scott, and Geraldine Downey. "Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior." Development and Psychopathology 6, no. 1 (1994): 231–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579400005976.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractSubstantial evidence indicates a link between exposure to family violence in childhood and troubled social relationships. We draw on attachment and social-cognitive theory to formulate a model of the mechanisms underlying this association. The model proposes that early experiences of overt rejection (e.g., physical maltreatment) or covert rejection (e.g., emotional neglect) are internalized as sensitivity to rejection. In this study, we operationalize sensitivity to rejection in social-cognitive terms as a tendency to expect and be concerned about rejection across a range of social situations. We hypothesize that rejection sensitivity mediates the link between exposure to family violence and adult attachment behavior. Data from a survey of 212 undergraduates support this hypothesis and also provide evidence that indicates sensitivity to rejection underlies both avoidant and ambivalent patterns of insecure adult attachment behavior. Overall, the results illustrate the power of a process approach to explaining the developmental sequelae of maltreatment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Massicotte-Azarniouch, David, Manish M. Sood, Dean A. Fergusson, and Greg A. Knoll. "Validation of the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision Codes for Kidney Transplant Rejection and Failure." Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease 7 (January 2020): 205435812097739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358120977390.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Clinical research requires that diagnostic codes captured from routinely collected health administrative data accurately identify individuals with a disease. Objective: In this study, we validated the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) definition for kidney transplant rejection (T86.100) and for kidney transplant failure (T86.101). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A large, regional transplantation center in Ontario, Canada. Patients: All adult kidney transplant recipients from 2002 to 2018. Measurements: Chart review was undertaken to identify the first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed rejection and graft loss for all participants. For each observation, we determined the first date a single ICD-10 code T86.100 or T86.101 was recorded as a hospital encounter discharge diagnosis. Methods: Using chart review as the gold standard, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for the ICD-10 codes T86.100 and T86.101. Results: Our study population comprised of 1,258 kidney transplant recipients. The prevalence of rejection and death-censored graft loss were 15.6 and 9.1%, respectively. For the ICD-10 rejection code (T86.100), sensitivity was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.6-79.2), specificity 97.5% (96.5-98.4), and PPV 83.8% (78.3-89.4). For the ICD-10 graft loss code (T86.101), sensitivity was 21.2% (95% CI, 13.2-29.3), specificity 86.3% (84.3-88.3), and PPV 11.7% (7.0-16.4). Limitations: Single-center study which may limit generalizability of our findings. Conclusions: A single ICD-10 code for kidney transplant rejection (T86.100) was present in 84% of true kidney transplant rejections and is an accurate way of identifying kidney transplant recipients with rejection using administrative health data. The ICD-10 code for graft failure (T86.101) performed poorly and should not be used for administrative health research.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Cultice, Rachel A., Diana T. Sanchez, and Analia F. Albuja. "Sexual growth mindsets and rejection sensitivity in sexual satisfaction." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 39, no. 4 (November 11, 2021): 1131–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02654075211054390.

Full text

Abstract:

Research suggests that having a sexual growth mindset (SGM), or believing that a person can become a better sexual partner over time, may improve sexual relationships. The present research investigated the impact of SGMs on a new sexual outcome: sexual rejection sensitivity. In Study 1, adults in romantic relationships completed measures of SGM and sexual rejection sensitivity from their own and from their partner’s perspective ( N = 377; 49.9% women; M age = 29.1 years, SD age = 12.2 years). Findings show that perceived partner, but not own, SGM is associated with lower sexual rejection sensitivity, and sexual rejection sensitivity mediated the link between perceived partner SGM and own sexual satisfaction. In Study 2, we replaced perceived partner SGM with actual partner SGM by recruiting both members of 104 different-sex romantic couples ( M age = 43.9 years, SD age = 14.5 years). Study 2 finds that partner, but not own, SGM was negatively associated with sexual rejection sensitivity. Further, sexual rejection sensitivity was negatively associated with sexual satisfaction in Study 1 and for women in Study 2. This work demonstrates the importance of sexual partners’ implicit beliefs about sexuality (perceived or reported) in understanding sexual outcomes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Sato, Momoko, Peter Fonagy, and Patrick Luyten. "Rejection Sensitivity and Borderline Personality Disorder Features: The Mediating Roles of Attachment Anxiety, Need to Belong, and Self-Criticism." Journal of Personality Disorders 34, no. 2 (April 2020): 273–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_397.

Full text

Abstract:

Rejection hypersensitivity has been considered the core feature of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, little is known about the possible developmental mechanisms that might explain the association between rejection sensitivity and BPD features. The current study investigated the mediating roles of adult attachment, need to belong, and self-criticism in the association between rejection sensitivity and BPD features in 256 healthy adults. Results indicated that attachment anxiety, need to belong, and self-criticism mediated the association between rejection sensitivity and BPD features. However, attachment anxiety and self-criticism did not moderate the mediated association between rejection sensitivity and BPD features. The findings suggest that individuals with high rejection sensitivity are more likely to be anxiously attached to significant others, which might increase the desire to be accepted by others. To satisfy this elevated need to affiliate with others, these individuals might become more self-critical, which may contribute to high BPD features.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Bäck, Emma A., Hanna Bäck, and Gema Garcia-Albacete. "Protest Activity, Social Incentives, and Rejection Sensitivity." Contention 1, no. 1 (January 1, 2013): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/cont.2013.010101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Zou, Xi, Jung Won Lee, and Abigail Scholer. "Rejection Sensitivity and Forming New Professional Relationships." Academy of Management Proceedings 2018, no. 1 (August 2018): 10260. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.21.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

London, Bonita, Geraldine Downey, Cheryl Bonica, and Iris Paltin. "Social Causes and Consequences of Rejection Sensitivity." Journal of Research on Adolescence 17, no. 3 (September 2007): 481–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00531.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Downey, Geraldine, and Scott I. Feldman. "Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70, no. 6 (1996): 1327–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ehnvall, Anna, Philip B. Mitchell, Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic, Colleen Loo, Michael Breakspear, Adam Wright, Gloria Roberts, Andrew Frankland, and Justine Corry. "Pain and rejection sensitivity in bipolar depression." Bipolar Disorders 13, no. 1 (February 2011): 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00892.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Ayduk, Ozlem, Geraldine Downey, and Minji Kim. "Rejection Sensitivity and Depressive Symptoms in Women." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, no. 7 (July 2001): 868–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Park, Lora E., and Rebecca T. Pinkus. "Interpersonal effects of Appearance-based Rejection Sensitivity." Journal of Research in Personality 43, no. 4 (August 2009): 602–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Liu, Shen, Lin Zhang, Qun Tan, Yanlin Zhao, and Qiang Xu. "Attentional characteristics of Chinese college students receiving social threat cues in rejection situations." Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 45, no. 8 (September 13, 2017): 1293–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6234.

Full text

Abstract:

We investigated the attentional characteristics of 98 Chinese college students when they received social threat cues in explicit and ambiguous rejection situations, and further examined the moderating effect of degree of rejection sensitivity. Participants were instructed to play an interactive game in pairs, after which they completed the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire for College Students and, finally, a dot-probe task. The results showed that all participants had an attentional bias toward social rejection cues in both social rejection and general situations. In the ambiguous rejection situation, highly rejection-sensitive individuals showed attentional bias and tended to avoid social threat cues and nonsocial negative cues. Degree of rejection sensitivity moderated the relationship of ambiguous rejection, influencing individuals' attentional processing of threat cues. We sought to develop some specific interventions that could be used to alert highly rejection-sensitive college students to the characteristics of the attentional processing strategies they use for social avoidance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Tkhatl, L. K., T. V. Stavenchuk, E. D. Kosmachova, and I. A. Pashkova. "Criteria for diagnosis of humoral rejection using the method of 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography." Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs 21, no. 1 (May 18, 2019): 46–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2019-1-46-56.

Full text

Abstract:

Aim: to identify predictors of humoral rejection at different stages using non-invasive methods of 2D-speckletracking echocardiography, to determine the correlation with immunological changes.Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of Regional Clinic Hospital of Krasnodar from 2010 to 2017. The analysis of 181 heart recipients was performed. 5 groups were allocated due to the crisis of humoral rejection and the identified antibodies to donor leukocyte antigens (HLA antibodies): group 1 (n = 10) – DSA and humoral rejection, group 2 (n = 7), patients with non-DSA and humoral rejection, group 3 (n = 17) – patients with antibodies to HLA, no humoral rejection, group 4 (n = 11), humoral crisis of rejection, with no identified HLA antibodies, group 5 (n = 87) – patients do not have antibodies to HLA and signs of both humoral and cellular rejection according to EMB. Recipients were carried out endomyocardial biopsy, immunological study, 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography, statistical methods.Results. The diagnostic criteria for a humoral rejection is greater than 1 degree are global peak systolic strain or strain rate of left ventricle (GLPSLV) – 9.94 ± 1.37% (the sensitivity was 86.2%, specificity – 90.4%); radial systolic strain (RadSLV) of 19.36 ± 3.66% (sensitivity was 75.8%, specificity – 84.5%); circumferential systolic strain (CiRSLV) – 17.83 ± 4.79% (sensitivity was 78.6%, specificity – 84.4%); the twisting of the left ventricle (twist) – 8.90 ± 1.85% (sensitivity – 66.7%, specificity – 94.2%), p < 0.001. When considering indicators GLPSLV and longitudinal peak strain of the right ventricle (GLPSRV) in the diagnosis of humoral rejection sensitivity increases to 91.9%, specificity increases to 94.6%, p < 0.001.Conclusion. GLPSLV has greater sensitivity at the stage of subclinical changes. It is more significantly reduced with increasing degree of rejection associated with episodes of rejection in comparison with other parameters and deformation mechanics. The interrelation between histological and immunological changes and impaired myocardial deformation. The proposed diagnostic algorithm will predict humoral rejection.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Luterek, Jane A., Gerlinde C. Harb, Richard G. Heimberg, and Brian P. Marx. "Interpersonal Rejection Sensitivity in Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors." Journal of Interpersonal Violence 19, no. 1 (January 2004): 90–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260503259052.

Full text

Abstract:

This study investigated whether interpersonal rejection sensitivity serves a mediating role between childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and three long-term psychological correlates of CSA in adult female survivors: depressive symptoms, anger suppression, and attenuated emotional expression. Interpersonal rejection sensitivity has been shown to be a risk factor for the development of depression and is elevated in CSA survivors. Similarly, attenuated emotional expression, particularly anger, has been related to adjustment difficulties in CSA survivors. Participants in this study were 355 female undergraduates, 34 ofwhomreported a history of CSA. Results demonstrated that interpersonal rejection sensitivity mediates the relationship between CSA and later depressive symptoms. Interpersonal rejection sensitivity partially mediated the relationship between CSA and anger suppression; however, it did not mediate the relationship between CSA and attenuated emotional expression. These results are examined within the context of the current literature on adult CSA survivors and their implications are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Cassidy, Tony, Melanie Giles, and Alexis Carey. "Attachment, Rejection Sensitivity, Support, Psychological Capital and Alcohol Dependency in Students." Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences 3, no. 4 (September 17, 2021): 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.33094/26410249.2021.34.69.77.

Full text

Abstract:

Alcohol dependence evolves from problematic social relations hinged on attachment difficulties and fear of social rejection. This study sought to test an attachment-rejection-relationship model of the development of alcohol dependency. Emerging adults (N=762) of which 69.8%, were female, ranging in age from 18-63 years, took part in an online survey measuring adult attachment, rejection sensitivity, loneliness, social support, psychological capital, and alcohol consumption. Analysis supports the model and shows that individuals with insecure and anxious attachment, fear of social rejection, who experience loneliness and lack of social support, and whose psychological resources are less effective, are more likely to be at risk for alcohol dependency. The role of attachment, rejection and social relations in alcohol consumption point to social problem-solving interventions. Given the childhood origins of attachment problems and fear of social rejection there is a strong case for prevention using social problem-solving.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Weinstein, A. "Complement rejection reaction." Kazan medical journal 25, no. 11 (October 29, 2021): 1234. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/kazmj80525.

Full text

Abstract:

Saphir used the complement rejection reaction in 5 cases of typhoid fever (Wien. Klin. Woch., 1929, no. 33) and observed the superiority of this reaction over Widal's reaction in the sense of sensitivity and earlier appearance, which is why it can serve as a very valuable laboratory method in diagnostics of typhoid fever.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Schaan, Violetta K., André Schulz, Michael Bernstein, Hartmut Schächinger, and Claus Vögele. "Effects of rejection intensity and rejection sensitivity on social approach behavior in women." PLOS ONE 15, no. 1 (January 17, 2020): e0227799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227799.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Leng, Yue, Xing Qian, and Yanmei Zhu. "Modulation of brain response to peer rejection by rejection sensitivity: An exploratory study." Neuropsychologia 117 (August 2018): 389–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J., Drew Nesdale, Leanne McGregor, Shawna Mastro, Belinda Goodwin, and Geraldine Downey. "Comparing reports of peer rejection: Associations with rejection sensitivity, victimization, aggression, and friendship." Journal of Adolescence 36, no. 6 (December 2013): 1237–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.10.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Beeson, Christina M. L., Heather Brittain, and Tracy Vaillancourt. "The Temporal Precedence of Peer Rejection, Rejection Sensitivity, Depression, and Aggression Across Adolescence." Child Psychiatry & Human Development 51, no. 5 (May 28, 2020): 781–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01008-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Bach, Patrick, Ulrich Frischknecht, Svenja Klinkowski, Melanie Bungert, Damian Karl, Christian Vollmert, Sabine Vollstädt-Klein, Stefanie Lis, Falk Kiefer, and Derik Hermann. "Higher Social Rejection Sensitivity in Opioid-Dependent Patients Is Related to Smaller Insula Gray Matter Volume: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study." Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 14, no. 11 (November 1, 2019): 1187–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz094.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Opioid-dependent patients are highly sensitized to negative social feedback, and increased social rejection sensitivity was linked to adverse treatment outcome, but its neurobiological underpinnings have not been understood yet. The present study investigated gray matter (GM) volume differences between 19 opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) patients and 20 healthy controls using magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based morphometry. Associations of GM volumes with subjective feelings of exclusion and inclusion during a social ostracism (Cyberball) paradigm, with rejection sensitivity, social interaction anxiety and social phobia were explored. OMT patients displayed smaller GM volume in the bilateral insula and inferior frontal gyri. Psychometric and task data showed that patients reported significantly higher rejection sensitivity, social anxiety and social phobia scores and felt more excluded and less included during the social ostracism paradigm. Smaller GM volume in the insula was associated with higher subjective exclusion, lower subjective inclusion and higher rejection sensitivity, social anxiety and social phobia scores. Findings indicate that structural deficits in emotion- and anxiety-processing brain regions in OMT patients are associated with increased social rejection sensitivity. As social rejection is a potential trigger for relapse, patients might benefit from therapeutic strategies that promote social integration.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Rosenbach, Charlotte, Babette Renneberg, and Herbert Scheithauer. "Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Children’s Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (CRSQ)." International Journal of Developmental Science 15, no. 1-2 (August 20, 2021): 29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/dev-210312.

Full text

Abstract:

Rejection Sensitivity (RS) is defined as the disposition to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and overreact to social rejection cues. Aim of the two studies presented in this paper was to develop and administer an instrument to assess RS in a German sample of healthy (pre)adolescents as well as in a clinical sample. The English Children’s Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (CRSQ) was translated, adapted, and presented to a non-clinical sample (N = 128) (Study I) to identify psychometric properties of the instrument. In Study II, the resulting questionnaire was completed by a mixed clinical sample (N = 50). Differences in results between samples, and the relation between rejection sensitivity and mental distress were investigated. The resulting German version of the questionnaire CRSQ (German: Fragebogen zur Zurückweisungsempfindlichkeit für Kinder und Jugendliche, FZE-K) showed good psychometric properties. Differences between samples provide insight into the diversity of the construct “rejection sensitivity”.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Neumann, M. Christine, Hans Sprenger, Scott O. Grebe, Dietmar Gemsa, Gilbert Reibnegger, Harald Lange, and Thomas F. Müller. "Neopterin, Serum Amyloid A, and Cytokine Monitoring After Renal Transplantation." Pteridines 9, no. 2 (May 1998): 113–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pteridines.1998.9.2.113.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary A reliable and early diagnosis of viral infections and rejection episodes is a major goal of immunologic monitoring in transplantation. Soluble markers like the cytokines, neopterin or serum amyloid A are frequently recommended as diagnostic parameters. However they are not often used routinely in transplant medicine. The study investigates the diagnostic value of plasma (P), serum (S), and urine (U) levels of neopterin (S-/U-NEOP), serum amyloid A (SAA), tumor necrosis factor-α, (P-/U-TNF-α), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (P-/U -sIL-2R), and interleukin-6 (U -IL-6) in transplant monitoring and describes an approach for their use in the clinical routine decision making. In 29 renal transplant patients blood and urine samples were collected daily during the posttransplant course on ward. The cytokines were measured by ELISAs, neopterin by RIA, and SAA by immunonephelometry. Descriptive statistics, sensitivity and specificity, day of first significant parameter increase/decrease, receiver operating characteristic curves, and post-test probabilities were calculated for each parameter. 12 acute rejection episodes were diagnosed. As rejection markers, S-NEOP and P-TNF-α had the highest sensitivity, U-IL-6 the highest specificity. 8 viral infections occurred. U-NEOP showed values higher than 1000 μmol/moICrea. It did not exceed this threshold in case of rejection episodes. SAA and U-IL-6 showed peak. levels during rejections but not during episodes of viral infections. Using the calculated likelihood ratio formulas the probability for the occurrence of an acute rejection could be estimated for the individual, daily parameter measurement. Adding the physician IS rating for rejection posttest probabilities were computed. Immunologic monitoring is possible in transplant medicine. Using daily measurements of serum amyloid A and neopterin facilitates the differential diagnosis of acute rejection episodes and viral infections. The likelihood ratio approach permits an application of the parameter monitoring in the clinical routine.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Park, Myung-Jin, and Nanmi Yang. "Validation of Rejection Sensitivity Scale for College Students." KOREAN JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY 29, no. 1 (February 28, 2017): 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2017.02.29.1.103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!