Relevant bibliographies by topics / Resin-modified glass ionomer

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Book chapters
  4. Conference papers
  5. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Resin-modified glass ionomer'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 14 June 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Resin-modified glass ionomer.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer"

1

Croll, Theodore P. "RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER." Journal of the American Dental Association 144, no. 11 (2013): 1224–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0047.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Futatsuki, Masato, Miyuki Nozawa, Tetsuro Ogata, and Minoru Nakata. "Wear of resin-modified glass ionomers : an in vitro study." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 25, no. 4 (2001): 297–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.25.4.w05l3m2316557740.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear resistance and clinical applicability of resin-modified glass ionomer cements as restorative or fissure-sealing materials. The in vitro wear of resin-modified glass ionomers was compared to conventional glass ionomers, a resin-based sealant, and a composite resin. A three-body wear test (enamel block - polymethylmethacrylate powder - experimental dental material) was performed by 20,000 cycles with a load of 4kgf/cm2. The depth of wear of the experimental materials was measured and calculated using a computerized laser surface scanner. The glass ionomers generally showed more wear than the resin-based sealant and the composite resin, but there was no difference in wear between resin-modified and conventional glass ionomers. Type III ionomers (used for sealant) showed lower wear resistance than type II ionomers (used for restoration).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

PEDRINI, Denise, Elerson GAETTI-JARDIM JÚNIOR, and Andréia Coelho de VASCONCELOS. "Retention of oral microorganisms on conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements." Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira 15, no. 3 (2001): 196–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912001000300004.

Full text
Abstract:
Secondary caries are a worldwide public and socioeconomic problem. The placement of restorations can lead to the development of environmental conditions favorable to microbial colonization, especially on the tooth/restoration interface, which is a predisposing factor for secondary caries. The aim of this study was to evaluate microbial retention on conventional (Chelon-Fil and Vidrion R) and resin-modified (Vitremer and Fuji II LC) glass-ionomer cements, in situ, using a hybrid composite resin (Z100) as a control. Twelve volunteers wore Hawley appliances with specimens made of all tested filling materials for 7 days. The specimens were then removed from the appliances and transferred to tubes containing 2.0 ml of Ringer-PRAS. Microorganisms from the samples were inoculated onto blood agar and Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar and incubated under anaerobiosis (90% N2, 10% CO2), at 37°C, for 10 and 2 days, respectively. The resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and the composite resin retained the same levels of microorganisms on their surfaces. The resin-modified glass-ionomers retained less mutans streptococci than the composite resin and conventional glass-ionomer cements. The conventional glass-ionomer cements retained less mutans streptococci than the composite resin, but that difference was not statistically significant.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Zakaria, Manzuma Akhter, Mozammal Hossain, and Ali Asgor Moral. "Comparative efficacy of nanofilled and microfilled resin-modified glass ionomer as pits and fissure sealant in permanent molar teeth." Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal 10, no. 2 (2017): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v10i2.31877.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of nanofilled and microfilled resin- modified glass ionomer as pits and fissure sealants in permanent molar teeth. Ninety six teeth having fissure at the occlusal surface were randomly divided into two groups: Group I: Treated by nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer sealant and Group II: Treated by microfilled resin- modified glass ionomer sealants. Clinical assessment was performed by modified Ryge´s criteria by means of retention, color match, marginal adaptation at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up visit. Chi-square test was used for testing differences between the two groups; a value of p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The results revealed that at 12 months observation period, nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer sealant showed better retention, color stability and marginal adaptation than that of microfilled resin-modified glass ionomer sealants. Furthermore, the differences between two groups in respect to marginal adaptation and color match were statistically significant (p<0.05). It can be concluded that nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer sealant could be a better alternative to microfilled resin- modified glass ionomer sealant.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Arifin, Fadil Abdillah, Erna Irawati, Indrya Kirana Mattulada, Sarahfin Aslan, Risnayanti Anas, and Nurul Ilmi Mursaling. "Pengaruh Perendaman Susu UHT dan Susu Sapi Segar Terhadap Kekasaran Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement." Sinnun Maxillofacial Journal 3, no. 01 (2021): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/smj.v3i01.4.

Full text
Abstract:
Pendahuluan: Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) atau Semen Ionomer Kaca Modifikasi Resin merupakan salah satu bahan restorasi yang digunakan di bidang kedokteran gigi. Pengembangan resin-modified glass ionomer cement dimulai sejak tahun 1967 untuk memperbaiki sifat fisik dan mengurangi sensitivitas air dari glass ionomer cement konvensional. Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) sebagai bahan kedokteran gigi memiliki beberapa keuntungan yaitu: RMGIC dapat melepaskan fluoride, kekuatan RMGIC lebih besar dibandingkan dengan glass ionomer cement konvensional, dan estetika lebih baik daripada Glass Ionomer Cement. Tujuan Penelitian: Untuk mengetahui pengaruh perendaman susu UHT dan susu sapi segar terhadap resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Eksperimental Laboratorium yaitu pengujian yang dilakukan di laboratorium dengan bentuk penelitian berupa Pre Test-Post Test with Control Group Design. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah True Eksperimental Laboratorium. Hasil: Berdasarkan uji one way anova sebelum perendaman diperoleh p-valuesebesar 0,795 (p>0,05) Berdasarkan uji one way anova setelah perendaman diperoleh p-value sebesar 0,669 (p>0,05) Berdasarkan uji post hoc multiple comparison diperoleh perbedaan rata-rata antara susu sapi segar dan susu UHT sebesar 0,1114500 , untuk aquades dan susu UHT sebesar -0,022000. Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perubahan yang signifikan terhadap kekasaran resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ludlow, SW, SN Farmer, ME Donaldson, D. Tantbirojn, and A. Versluis. "Microleakage of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations With Selective Enamel Etching." Operative Dentistry 39, no. 4 (2014): E154—E159. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/13-290-l.

Full text
Abstract:
SUMMARY Aim Bonding of resin-modified glass ionomers to enamel is an important quality, especially when saliva contamination is inevitable. This study evaluated if microleakage of a resin-modified glass ionomer improves with selective enamel etching, with or without saliva contamination. Methods Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and the gingival margin on the root were prepared in extracted human permanent teeth and filled with a resin-modified glass ionomer using an acidic primer according to the manufacturer's recommendation or with an additional selective enamel etching step. Preparations were contaminated with saliva before primer application or before restoration placement (n=10). Restored teeth were thermocycled between 5°C and 55°C for 1000 cycles, stained with basic fuchsin, and sectioned. Microleakage distance was measured and analyzed with analysis of variance followed by Duncan post hoc test at a significance level of 0.05. Results Enamel microleakage was highest when saliva contamination occurred before the placement of resin-modified glass ionomer. Microleakage distances were significantly reduced in the selective etching groups regardless of saliva contamination. However, selective etching of enamel increased microleakage in cementum. The increase in cementum leakage was significantly higher when saliva contamination occurred before restoration placement. Conclusion Selective etching reduces enamel microleakage of a resin-modified glass ionomer even with saliva contamination, but it may increase microleakage at the cementum. The severity of microleakage is affected by the timing of saliva contamination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Farret, Marcel M., Eduardo Martinelli de Lima, Eduardo Gonçalves Mota, Hugo Mitsuo S. Oshima, Gabriela Maguilnik, and Patrícia Alves Scheid. "Assessment of the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements for orthodontic cementation." Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 17, no. 6 (2012): 154–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512012000600027.

Full text
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mechanical properties of three glass ionomers cements (GICs) used for band cementation in Orthodontics. METHODS: Two conventional glass ionomers (Ketac Cem Easy mix/3M-ESPE and Meron/Voco) and one resin modified glass ionomer (Multi-cure Glass ionomer/3M-Unitek) were selected. For the compressive strength and diametral tensile strength tests, 12 specimens were made of each material. For the microhardness test 15 specimens were made of each material and for the shear bond strength tests 45 bovine permanent incisors were used mounted in a self-cure acrylic resin. Then, band segments with a welded bracket were cemented on the buccal surface of the crowns. For the mechanical tests of compressive and diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength a universal testing machine was used with a crosshead speed of 1,0 mm/min and for the Vickers microhardness analysis tests a Microdurometer was used with 200 g of load during 15 seconds. The results were submitted to statistical analysis through ANOVA complemented by Tukey's test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The results shown that the Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer presented higher diametral tensile strength (p < 0.01) and compressive strength greater than conventional GICs (p = 0.08). Moreover, Ketac Cem showed significant less microhardness (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The resin-modified glass ionomer cement showed high mechanical properties, compared to the conventional glass ionomer cements, which had few differences between them.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo, Eduardo Batista Franco, Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli, Paulo Afonso Silveira Francisconi, and Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro. "Diametral tensile strength and water sorption of glass-ionomer cements used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment." Journal of Applied Oral Science 11, no. 2 (2003): 96–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572003000200003.

Full text
Abstract:
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the diametral tensile strength and the water sorption of restorative (Fuji IX and Ketac Molar) and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (ProTec Cem, Fuji Plus and Vitremer) mixed at both manufacturer and increased powder: liquid ratio, for their use in the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. A conventional restorative glass-ionomer (Ketac Fil) was used as control. Specimens (6.0 mm in diameter x 3.0 mm in height) were prepared and stored (1 hour, 1 day and 1 week) for a diametral tensile strength test. Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). For the water sorption test, specimens of 15.0 mm in diameter x 0.5 mm in height were prepared and transfered to desiccators until a constant mass was obtained. Then the specimens were immersed in deionized water for 7 days, weighed and reconditioned to a constant mass in desiccators. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). Five specimens of each studied material and consistency were prepared for each test. The resin-modified glass-ionomer cements showed significantly higher strength than the conventional materials. Except for ProTec Cem, the diametral tensile strength of the resin-modified materials significantly increased from luting to restorative consistency. Except for ProTec Cem, the water sorption of the resin-modified glass ionomers was higher than the others. The water sorption of resin-modified materials at restorative consistency was significantly lower than at luting consistency. Resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements mixed at increased powder: liquid ratio showed better properties than at luting consistency.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Thompson, Van P. "RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER: Authors' response." Journal of the American Dental Association 144, no. 11 (2013): 1227–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0048.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Khatun, Dilruba, Mozammal Hossain, Md Joynal Abdin, Md Abdul Hannan Sheikh, and Md Shamsul Alam. "A comparative clinical study on efficacy of nanofilled resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer pit and fissure sealant in molar tooth." Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal 11, no. 4 (2018): 278–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v11i4.38447.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study compared the clinical performance of nanoparticulated resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer pit and fissure sealant on permanent molars. Fifty patient having bilateral occlusal grooves in pits and fissures of the occlusal surface were included for this study where 50 teeth were treated with nanopaticulated resin modified and the remaining 50 teeth were subjected to conventional glass ionomer sealants. The color match, retention and marginal adaptation were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months and statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square test to assess the difference between the two sealants; a values of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The results showed that although there were no significant differences between two sealants at baseline and 3 months observation period but nanoparticulated resin modified glass ionomer sealants showed better clinical performance than that of conventional glass ionomer sealants at 12 months and the differences between two sealants were statistically significant (p<0.05). It can be concluded that naqnoparticulated resin modified glass ionomer sealant exhibited better color stability, more retention, and better marginal adaptation than those of conventional glass ionomer sealants at 12 months observation period.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer"

1

Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur. "Resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials : an evaluation involving microscopy." Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.362847.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Karjiker, Farzana. "The colour stability of various glass ionomer cements." University of the Western Cape, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/7023.

Full text
Abstract:
>Magister Scientiae - MSc<br>Introduction: Together with bonding to both enamel and dentine, an ideal restorative material would display physical properties similar to that of natural tooth tissue and would not be prone to degradation as a result of the oral environment. This includes changes in colour. Glass ionomer technology has undergone many changes to its original chemistry since it was developed in the early 1970’s. In 1988 resin-modified glass ionomers were introduced and in 2008, nano-ionomers were introduced. As a result of the progression in material sciences and the use of more sophisticated techniques and methods in restorative dentistry, it is possible to accomplish much improved aesthetics and functional durability of a restoration, both anteriorly and posteriorly. However, for as long as aesthetic restorations have been available, and in spite of advances in material structure and performance, one of the greatest challenges facing clinicians still remains that aesthetic restorations have to be replaced relatively frequently as staining and discolouration is a common problem. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to determine the stainability of four resin-modified glass ionomers and one glass ionomer cement when exposed to a staining broth. Objectives: To record any change in colour before and after exposing the sample with the staining broth using a spectrophotometer, to compare the stainability, to examine the depth of staining using a light microscope and to observe the particle size of the powder and the surface texture using Scanning Electron Microscopy of the four resin- modified glass ionomer cements and one glass ionomer cement. Materials and Methods: Four resin-modified glass ionomers (one nano-ionomer) and one glass ionomer (zinc-reinforced ionomer) were selected. All were shade A2, except for Vitremer™ which was not available in A2. 15 discs of each material were prepared. The discs were 15 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness. All the materials were handled and cured according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After curing, only one side of each disc was polished using Sof-Lex™ discs (3M ESPE, USA). The unpolished side of each disc was designated as a matrix finish. The specimens were all immersed in distilled water at 37 °C for one week. They were then immersed in a staining broth for a period of one week and readings were taken after a period of 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours and one week. Colour was read on each side of each disc at the indicated intervals with a spectrophotometer. The colour difference was calculated using the CIELAB colour co-ordinates. Sample discs were then sectioned to determine the depth of staining. An additional sample disc of each material was made for observation with the SEM and was therefore not stained. Also, an unmixed sample of each material was prepared for examination with the SEM. Results: In general, for all materials there was an increase in staining when assessed with the colour difference between the baseline colour and the 7 day reading. Ketac™ N100, showed the highest total colour change of 43.84 for the unpolished surface followed by Riva™ which showed the total colour change of 28.55 for the unpolished surface. This was similar to Fuji II LC® which had a total colour change of 28.16 for the unpolished surface. For Vitremer™, the total colour change increased to 18.07 for the unpolished surface. For the unpolished surfaces, ChemFil™ Rock showed the least colour difference from baseline to 7 days (ΔE*ab = 10.45), followed by Vitremer™ (ΔE*ab = 18.07). Both Fuji II LC® and Riva™ Light Cure showed similar colour change from baseline to 7 days for unpolished surfaces (ΔE*ab of 28.16 and 28.55 respectively). Ketac™ N100 showed the highest staining after 7 days in the staining broth with a colour difference of 43.84. For the polished surfaces, the colour change for Fuji II LC® was 25.72 which was similar to Riva™ Light Cure which was 22.44 and Ketac™ N100 which showed a colour change of 22.79 on the polished surface. ChemFil™ Rock showed the least colour change of 17.69 for the polished surface followed by Vitremer™ which showed a colour change of 23.63 for the polished surface. Thus, for both the unpolished and polished surfaces there was a similar staining pattern. Conclusion: In this study it was demonstrated that all products evaluated in this study showed some degree of staining when exposed to a staining broth when evaluated using the ΔE*ab CIELAB colour evaluation. Ketac™ N100 showed the highest colour change compared to the other materials, but the reason for this was not explored. Both Vitremer™ and ChemFil™ Rock showed similar patterns of staining.<br>2020-09-01
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rix, Douglas. "Bond strengths and fluoride release of modified glass ionomer and resin adhesives." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ39873.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ro, Emily Y. "Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Two Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cements." VCU Scholars Compass, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10156/1759.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Torabzadeh, Hassan. "Laboratory and clinical investigations into resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and related materials." Thesis, University of Bristol, 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.337636.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Summers, Andrew. "Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive an in vitro and in vivo study /." Morgantown, W. Va. : [West Virginia University Libraries], 2002. http://etd.wvu.edu/templates/showETD.cfm?recnum=2336.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.S.)--West Virginia University, 2002.<br>Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 101 p. : ill. (some col.). Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 57-63).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Luo, Yan, and 羅琰. "Assessment of a glass polyalkenoate cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite for the restoration of posterior teeth." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2000. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31242121.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Luo, Yan. "Assessment of a glass polyalkenoate cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite for the restoration of posterior teeth." Hong Kong : University of Hong Kong, 2000. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record.jsp?B22242879.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Molleri, Roberto Rogerio. "Avaliação in vitro da liberação de fluoretos de duas resinas compostas modificadas por poliacidos e um ionomerico modificado por resina." [s.n.], 2000. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/289718.

Full text
Abstract:
Orientador: Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins<br>Dissertaçâo (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba<br>Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-27T13:31:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Molleri_RobertoRogerio_M.pdf: 1902314 bytes, checksum: baf7ac5c1ec9610da04287a80787fb87 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000<br>Resumo: Muitos estudos demonstram a liberação de fluoretos dos cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina e de resinas compostas modificadas por poliácidos. Os efeitos anticariogênicos dos fluoretos têm levado a sua incorporação em um grande número de materiais dentários. O objetivo deste estudo foi quantificar e comparar in vitro a liberação de fluoretos de três materiais restauradores, duas resinas compostas modificadas por poliácidos, e um cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina, nos períodos de 1,4,7,10,15 e 21 dias. Foram confeccionados cinco corpos-de-prova cilíndricos, com medidas de 3 mm de altura por 6 mm de diâmetro utilizando uma matriz metálica pré-fabricada. Os corpos de prova foram mantidos em recipientes com 20 mL de água destilada e deionizada, na temperatura de 37 graus centígrados. A água foi trocada após cada medição. A análise da água foi realizada por um potenciômetro modelo 720 A, marca Orion (Cambridge, MA, USA), acoplado a um eletrodo seletivo para fluoretos, modelo 9609, marca Orion (Cambridge, MA, USA), que determinou a quantidade de fluoretos em partes por milhão. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e teste de Tukey. O estudo demonstrou o mesmo padrão de liberação de fluoretos para os três materiais, pois todos apresentaram maior liberação nas primeiras 24 horas. Após o décimo dia houve estabilização na liberação para todos os materiais. A liberação de fluoretos nas resinas compostas modificadas por poliácidos se manteve menor e constante, se comparada ao cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina, que apresentou valores médios maiores<br>Abstract: Many studies have shown the release of fluorides frem resin-modified glass ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resin. The anticariogenic effects ofthe fluoride ions have called for their use in a great number of dental materiais. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare, in vitro, the fluoride release of three restorative materiais, the polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer, in 1,4, 7, 10, 15, and 21 days. Five cylindrical samples were made, 3 mm high by 6 mm in diameter by using a pre-built metallic matrix. The samples were stored in 20 mL containers in deionized, distilled water, at 37°C. The water was replaced after each measurement. The water analysis was done by an Orion 720 A model potentiometer (Cambridge, MA, USA), attached to an Orion 9609 model selective electrode for fluorides (Cambridge, MA, USA), which determined the amount of fluorides in parts per milion. The study showed the same fluoride release pattern forthe three materiais, as ali ofthem presented a high release in thefirst24 hours. Afterthetenth day, there was a stabilization in the release for ali materials. The fluorides release in the 'polyacid-modified composite resin remained lower and constant, comparing to the resin-modified ionomer glass cement, which showed higher mean values<br>Mestrado<br>Mestre em Materiais Dentários
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Al-Rowaieh, Saleh Abdulaziz. "Effect of a Desensitizing Agent and an Adhesive System on Microleakage Associated with Cast Restorations Luted with a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement." VCU Scholars Compass, 2002. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4336.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose: This study evaluated microleakage associated with cast restorations that were luted with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RelyX) following obturation of the dentinal tubules with either a desensitizing agent (Gluma Desensitizer) or an adhesive system (Scotchbond Multipurpose Dental Adhesive). The effect of acid etching on the removal of the smear layer and its influence on the extent of microleakage associated with the adhesive system was also evaluated. Materials and Methods: Extracted mandibular premolars (N = 48) were prepared for complete cast restorations and divided into 4 groups (N = 12). In group A ( control), neither a desensitizing agent or a component of the adhesive system was applied prior to luting. In group B, Gluma Desensitizer was used to obturate the dentinal tubules. In group C, Scotchbond Multipurpose Dental Adhesive System was applied to tooth preparations according to the manufacturer's instructions. Tooth preparations in group D received the same dentin surface treatment as in group C, but no acid etching was performed. Cast restorations in all 4 groups were then luted with the resin-modified glass ionomer luting cement RelyX. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling between 8° and 55°C for 500 cycles in water baths, placed in a solution of 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours, and then sectioned twice longitudinally, once mesiodistally and then buccolingually. All specimens were examined at X30 magnification with a stereomicroscope equipped with a digital camera. Photographs of all sections were made and the extent of microleakage along the tooth-cement interface was measured in millimeters using an image analysis software. Microleakage was perceived to have occurred along a segment of the tooth-luting cement interface when dye penetration from that segment into the dentinal tubules was detected. One-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05) was performed to identify differences in mean microleakage among the luting groups, followed by Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference Test for pairwise comparisons. Results: Large standard deviations were found in all 4 groups. No statistically significant difference was found among the control (0.64 ± 0.50 mm), Gluma Desensitizer (0.42 ± 0.24 mm), and Scotchbond Multipurpose without etching (0.67 ± 0.40 mm) groups. However, a statistically significant difference was found between the Scotchbond Multipurpose with etching (1.51 ± 0.92 mm) group and each of the other groups. Conclusions: The large standard deviations obtained implied a marked amount of variability in microleakage within each group, which might be the result of the small sample size used. The increase in microleakage when 35% phosphoric acid was used prior to dentin bonding is difficult to explain. Within the limitations of the study, the results suggest that the use of a nonpolymerizing, resin-based (Gluma Desensitizer) material or a photopolymerizing, resin-based (Scotchbond Multipurpose) system without etching had no effect on microleakage under cast restorations luted with the resin-modified glass ionomer luting cement RelyX. The increase in microleakage when etching with 35% phosphoric acid was preformed might be explained by the phenomenon known as nanoleakage, but further investigation is recommended in this area.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer"

1

Nicholson, John, and Beata Czarnecka. "Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements." In Materials for the Direct Restoration of Teeth. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100491-3.00007-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rahiotis, C., and S. Schricker. "Bonding with glass ionomer cements and resin-modified glass ionomer cements." In Orthodontic Applications of Biomaterials. Elsevier, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100383-1.00016-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer"

1

Aryo Nugroho, Teguh, Sondang Pintauli, and Amalia Oeripto. "Anti-Caries Effect of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements as Orthodontic Adhesive Material through Scanning Electron Microscope Examination (In Vitro)." In International Dental Conference of Sumatera Utara 2017 (IDCSU 2017). Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/idcsu-17.2018.75.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yudhit, Astrid, Kholidina Harahap, and Sabrina Chairunnisa Nasution. "Effect of Hydroxyapatite From Nile Tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus) Scale on Surface Hardness of Conventional and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (In Vitro Study)." In 1st Aceh International Dental Meeting (AIDEM 2019), Oral Health International Conference On Art, Nature And Material Science Development 2019. Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210201.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer"

1

Nuttall, Christopher S. Bond Strength of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers. Defense Technical Information Center, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ad1013158.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography