To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC).
Journal articles on the topic 'Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Arifin, Fadil Abdillah, Erna Irawati, Indrya Kirana Mattulada, Sarahfin Aslan, Risnayanti Anas, and Nurul Ilmi Mursaling. "Pengaruh Perendaman Susu UHT dan Susu Sapi Segar Terhadap Kekasaran Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement." Sinnun Maxillofacial Journal 3, no. 01 (April 27, 2021): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/smj.v3i01.4.
Full textAbstract:
Pendahuluan: Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) atau Semen Ionomer Kaca Modifikasi Resin merupakan salah satu bahan restorasi yang digunakan di bidang kedokteran gigi. Pengembangan resin-modified glass ionomer cement dimulai sejak tahun 1967 untuk memperbaiki sifat fisik dan mengurangi sensitivitas air dari glass ionomer cement konvensional. Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) sebagai bahan kedokteran gigi memiliki beberapa keuntungan yaitu: RMGIC dapat melepaskan fluoride, kekuatan RMGIC lebih besar dibandingkan dengan glass ionomer cement konvensional, dan estetika lebih baik daripada Glass Ionomer Cement. Tujuan Penelitian: Untuk mengetahui pengaruh perendaman susu UHT dan susu sapi segar terhadap resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Eksperimental Laboratorium yaitu pengujian yang dilakukan di laboratorium dengan bentuk penelitian berupa Pre Test-Post Test with Control Group Design. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah True Eksperimental Laboratorium. Hasil: Berdasarkan uji one way anova sebelum perendaman diperoleh p-valuesebesar 0,795 (p>0,05) Berdasarkan uji one way anova setelah perendaman diperoleh p-value sebesar 0,669 (p>0,05) Berdasarkan uji post hoc multiple comparison diperoleh perbedaan rata-rata antara susu sapi segar dan susu UHT sebesar 0,1114500 , untuk aquades dan susu UHT sebesar -0,022000. Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perubahan yang signifikan terhadap kekasaran resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
2
Ningsih, Diana Setya. "RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT SEBAGAI MATERIAL ALTERNATIF RESTORASI UNTUK GIGI SULUNG." ODONTO : Dental Journal 1, no. 2 (December 1, 2014): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/odj.1.2.46-51.
Full textAbstract:
Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a material that can release fluoride to prevent caries especially in primary teeth. One of the developments of glass ionomer cement in the world of pediatry dentistry is resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). The resin-modified glass ionomer cement were still maintaining the clinical advantages oforiginal material, such as fluoride realease, good compatibility and aestehetically. The mechanical properties of rmgic is more higher than gic. These materials have a better adhesion, higher moisture resistance, and a longer shelft life. This paper review aims to know the ability RMGIC as alternative restorative material for primary teeth.
3
Fattah, Zahra, Zahra Jowkar, and Safoora Rezaeian. "Microshear Bond Strength of Nanoparticle-Incorporated Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer to Caries-Affected Dentin." International Journal of Dentistry 2021 (April 16, 2021): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5565556.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of three different types of nanoparticles (silver (SNPs), titanium dioxide (TNPs), and zinc oxide (ZNPs)) on the microshear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement based on whether CGIC or RMGIC is used with four subgroups (based on the incorporation of SNPs, ZNPs, and TNPs in addition to a control subgroup) (n = 12) as follows: CGIC, CGIC + TNP, CGIC + ZNP, CGIC + SNP, RMGIC, RMGIC + TNP, RMGIC + ZNP, and RMGIC + SNP. After 24 hours, the μSBS of specimens was tested and the obtained data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test. The obtained results showed that the incorporation of TNPs in two glass ionomers was not statistically significant compared with the control subgroups ( p > 0.05). In the first group, the highest and lowest mean μSBS were, respectively, observed in the CGIC + SNP subgroup and CGIC + ZNP subgroup. In the second group, RMGIC + ZNP and RMGIC + SNP, respectively, showed the highest and lowest mean μSBS compared to the other subgroups. According to the results, it can be concluded that TNPs can be incorporated into both CGIC and RMGIC without compromising the bond strength of glass ionomers. SNPs and ZNPs can be, respectively, added to CGICs and RMGICs to improve the bond strength of the restoration.
4
Thomas, Mathew, Mohammed Mustafa, Reshma Karkera, AP Nirmal Raj, Lijo Isaac, and R. Naveen Reddy. "Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 17, no. 12 (2016): 1016–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1974.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Introduction This study was planned to find the solubility of the conventional luting cements in comparison with that of the polyacid-modified composite luting cement and recently introduced resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with exposure to water at early stages of mixing. Materials and methods An in vitro study of the solubility of the following five commercially available luting cements, viz., glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Fuji I, GC), zinc phosphate (Elite 100, GC), polyacid-modified resin cement (PMCR) (Principle, Dentsply), polycarboxylate cement (PC) (Poly - F, Dentsply), RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M), was conducted. For each of these groups of cements, three resin holders were prepared containing two circular cavities of 5 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. All the cements to be studied were mixed in 30 seconds and then placed in the prepared cavities in the resin cement holder for 30 seconds. Results From all of the observed luting cements, PMCR cement had shown the lowest mean loss of substance at all immersion times and RMGIC showed the highest mean loss of substance at all immersion times in water from 2 to 8 minutes. The solubility of cements decreased by 38% for GIC, 33% for ZnPO4, 50% for PMCR, 29% for PC, and 17% for RMGIC. Conclusion The PMCR cement (Principle-Dentsply) had shown lowest solubility to water at the given time intervals of immersion. This was followed by PC, zinc phosphate, and GIC to various time intervals of immersion. How to cite this article Karkera R, Nirmal Raj AP, Isaac L, Mustafa M, Reddy RN, Thomas M. Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):1016-1021.
5
Halim, Elsandra Novita, Karlina Samadi, and Sri Kunarti. "Efek Antibiofilm Glass Ionomer Cements dan Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Terhadap Lactobacillus acidophilus." Conservative Dentistry Journal 7, no. 2 (December 5, 2019): 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/cdj.v7i2.2017.120-129.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Risk factors for developing secondary caries are similar to those resulting in primary caries. The marginal seal of a restoration is one of the important factors predicting clinical success. The antibiofilm effect of materials used for the luting cement of oral function affects oral health. Antibiofilm properties of dental luting materials such as Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) may improve the restorative treatment outcome. Purpose: This experiment evaluates the antibiofilm effect of GIC and RMGIC on Lactobacillus acidophilus in vitro. Method: Lactobacillus acidophilus served as test microorganism. The quantitative microtiter plate biofilm assays were used to evaluate the antibiofilm effect of the dental luting materials on early-stage biofilm using a direct contact test (DCT) then continued by reading of Optical Density (OD) of biofilm using ELISA reader at a wavelength of 570nm. Result: GIC and RMGIC showed a decrease of OD value from negative control in all groups. The materials’ elute had effect on both bacterial growth with GIC higher then RMGIC to inhibit Lactobacillus acidophilus biofilm formation. Conclusion: The antibiofilm effect of GIC more effective than RMGIC to inhibit Lactobacillus acidophilus biofilm formation.
6
Abdul Rahman, Fatimah Suhaily, Dasmawati Mohamad, Habsah Hasan, and Hasnah Osman. "Physical Properties of Newly Developed Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement with Synthesised Coumarin Derivatives." Sains Malaysiana 50, no. 8 (August 31, 2021): 2433–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5008-24.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two types of coumarin derivatives, namely, 3-acetylcoumarin (AC) and coumarin thiosemicarbazone (CT) on surface characteristics such as the roughness, hardness, and morphology of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). The release of coumarin from the fabricated RMGIC was also investigated. AC and CT at 1.0% (w/w) concentration were added into 0.3 g of RMGIC powder and mixed with 0.1 g of polyacrylic acid. The fabricated RMGIC-AC and RMGIC-CT were evaluated for surface characteristics such as roughness, hardness and topography. The coumarin release of AC and CT from RMGIC was also determined. The RMGIC-CT demonstrated a decreased roughness value among the materials. The surface roughness exhibited by the RMGIC was statistically higher (p < 0.05) than that of fabricated materials. The RMGIC-AC was observed to have the highest hardness value compared to the RMGIC-CT and RMGIC, and this value was significantly higher (p < 0.05). The surface morphologies of the RMGIC-AC and RMGIC-CT showed a number of pores and irregular surfaces. Meanwhile, the surface roughness value of the RMGIC was statistically higher (p < 0.05) than both RMGIC-AC and RMGIC-CT. In conclusion, the large-sized AC particles significantly increased the surface hardness of the fabricated RMGIC. Conversely, the particle size of both coumarins were not influenced the surface roughness value and the coumarin release profile of fabricated RMGICs.
7
Maharani, Nuni, Agung Wibowo, Dudi Aripin, and Mohammad Richata Fadil. "Perbedaan nilai kekerasan permukaan semen Glass Ionomer (GIC) dan modifikasi resin semen Glass Ionomer (RMGIC) akibat efek cairan lambung buatan secara in vitro." Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students 1, no. 2 (October 30, 2017): 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/pjdrs.v1i1.22293.
Full textAbstract:
Pendahuluan: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) didefinisikan sebagai reflex otot esophagus atau spincter, yang memungkinkan asam lambung bergerak naik melalui kerongkongan hingga masuk kedalam rongga mulut. Asam lambung memiliki pH berkisar 1 hingga 1.5, berada di bawah pH kritis email sebesar 5.5 yang dapat menyebabkan terjadinya demineralisasi email, dentin, dan sementum. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk membedakan nilai kekasaran permukaan semen glass ionomer (GIC) dan modifikasi resin semen glass ionomer (RMGIC) akibat efek cairan lambung buatan. Metode: Penelitian yang dilakukan merupakan penelitian eksperimental murni secara in vitro. Sampel dipersiapkan sebanyak 40 buah, yang terdiri dari 20 sampel semen glass ionomer (GIC) dan 20 sampel modifikasi resin semen glass ionomer (RMGIC). Seluruh sampel dibagi ke dalam 4 kelompok, masing-masing terdiri dari 10 sampel yaitu (1) kelompok GIC direndam dalam saliva buatan, (2) kelompok RMGIC direndam dalam saliva buatan, (3) kelompok GIC direndam dalam cairan lambung buatan selama 3 kali 7 menit dan setelahnya direndam kembali dalam saliva buatan, dan (4) kelompok RMGIC direndam dalam cairan lambung buatan selama 3 kali 7 menit dan setelahnya direndam kembali dalam saliva buatan. Perendaman dilakukan selama 9 hari. Nilai kekasaran diukur dengan menggunakan surface roughness tester (Profilometri). Hasil dianalisis secara statistik dengan menggunakan uji ANAVA dan analisis post-hoc dengan menggunakan t-test. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan nilai kekasaran permukaan semen glass ionomer (GIC) dan modifikasi resin semen glass ionomer (RMGIC) akibat efek cairan lambung buatan. Simpulan: Paparan cairan asam lambung pada pasien GERD dapat mempengaruhi kekasaran permukaan bahan restorasi GIC dan RMGIC. Kata kunci: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Kekasaran permukaan, semen glass ionomer, modifikasi resin semen glass ionomer, profilometri ABSTRACTIntroduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as involuntary muscle relaxing of the upper esophageal sphincter, which allows refluxed acid to move upward through the esophagus into the oral cavity. The gastric acid has pH between 1 and 1.5, far below the critical pH of 5.5 at which tooth enamel will dissolve. Gastric juice has been shown to demineralize enamel, dentin, and root cementum. Methods: Fourthy samples of each restorative material, a conventional glass ionomer cement (20 samples) and a resin modified glass ionomer cement (20 samples), were prepared and divided into four groups, each group consist of 10 samples. Group (1) group of GIC immersed in simulated saliva and group (2) group of RMGIC immersed in simulated saliva, both control groups immersed for 9 days. Group (3) were group GIC and group (4) were RMGIC, both groups immersed in simulated saliva for 9 days and in between both groups immersed in gastric juice every 3 times a day for 7 minute. Each group subjected to profilometric analysis. The profilometric values were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and 2-way analysis of variance (post-hoc). Results: There are differences between GIC and RMGIC after immersion in gastric juice. Conclusion: Surface roughness of all tested materials were affected by the simulated gastric juice.Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, surface roughness, glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement, profilometer
8
Patil, Shruti, Mallikarjun Goud, and Girija Sajjan. "Effect of Short-term Fluoride Release from Various Restorative Cements on Enamel Demineralization: An in vitro Study." International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 1, no. 1 (2011): 29–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1005.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Purpose Fluorides are probably the most commonly used anticaries agents. Due to this property they are incorporated into various restorative materials. The rate and amount of fluoride release, however, vary for different materials, which in turn determines the effectiveness of the restorative material in preventing demineralization around the restoration. To evaluate the fluoride release and area of demineralization of resin modified glass ionomers and compomers, and compare them with conventional glass ionomer cement and also to evaluate the relationship between the fluoride release and demineralization. Materials and methods A total of 32 human incisors were chosen and sectioned horizontally at CEJ, and the middle 2 mm of facial enamel isolated and restored with the test materials: Conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), compomer and resin composite. The specimens were observed under polarized light microscope with image analyzer to measure the area and depth of demineralization. For fluoride release study, disks of test materials were suspended in deionized water and fluoride release was measured till a period of 4 days. Results The area and depth of demineralization were least around the GIC, followed by RMGIC, compomer and composite (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between fluoride release and demineralization which was, however, not statistically significant. Conclusion The 4-day fluoride release was also higher for GIC as compared to RMGIC and Compomer.
9
Azizov, AN N., and EM M. Gilmiyarov. "MODERN VIEW OF THE COMBINED USE OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND GLASS IONOMER CEMENT." Science and Innovations in Medicine 1, no. 2 (June 15, 2016): 55–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.35693/2500-1388-2016-0-2-55-58.
Full textAbstract:
The adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) to composite resin plays a very important role in the durability of sandwich restorations. Aim - to explore that co-curing RMGIC and composite resin to GIC using self-etch adhesives and bulk-fill materials may create a chemical bond and improve the bond strengths between these two materials. Materials and methods. Twenty specimens were prepared on gypsum blocks, with wells prepared in them by drilling holes, to retain the RMGIC. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups of 10 specimens each. In group I, after etching and rinsing the surface of cement, a thin layer of an adhesive, which was a Total-Etch type, was applied between RMGIC and the composite resin. In group II, the stage of etching was missed, a Self-Etch adhesive and a thin layer of bulk fill material were applied on the cement surface. Then after curing all the specimens, the shear bond strength was measured using a Bisco Shear bond testing machine. Failure mode was assessed under a stereomicroscope. Results. There were statistically significant differences in bond strengths between the groups (P< 0.05). Failures were predominantly of the cohesive type in all the groups. Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, the use of self-etch adhesive resin on the unset glass-ionomer and using bulk-fill material yielded the highest bond strength in the combined use of glass-ionomer cement and composite material.
10
Devara, Aditya Rama, Cecilia G. J. Lunardhi, and Tamara Yuanita. "Perbedaan Kebocoran Tepi antara GIC Konvensional dan Resin Modified GIC pada Restorasi Kelas V (Difference on Microleakage of Conventional GIC and Resin Modified GIC in Class V Restoration)." Conservative Dentistry Journal 6, no. 2 (July 31, 2016): 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/cdj.v6i2.2016.77-81.
Full textAbstract:
Background. Microleakage is one of the challenging concerns in direct filling restorations. Restoration material should have good adaptation between the restoration and the cavity walls to seal the cavity in a good way. Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is one of restoration material which indicated for class V cavity. GIC has a good adherence to the cavity wall but fragile to liquid contamination during the setting time. Resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) is a hybrid glass ionomer cement with the addition of hidroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) in the liquid to increase the properties and endurance to liquid contamination. Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference on microleakage of conventional GIC and resin modified GIC in class V restoration. Material and methods. Class V cavities (depth: 2 mm) were prepared on the cervical surface of 32 human first permanent premolars. Teeth were classified into three groups. Group 1: conventional GIC + varnish. Group 2:RMGIC + varnish. All cavities were restored, then stored in artificial saliva at 37ºC for 24 hours. The teeth were immersed in a 1% methylene blue dye solution for 24 hours, and then rinsed in running water, dried, and sectioned longitudinally. The section were assessed for microleakage of dye penetration by two independent evaluators using a digital microscope. Data were collected and statistically analyzed. Results. RMGIC showed no significant difference with conventional GIC. However, there is a slight difference, RMGIC has a slight lower microleakage than conventional GIC. Conclusion. RMGIC showed only slight lower microleakage than conventional GIC, but not significant.
11
Sharma, Anjna, and Pankaj Mishra. "Time-dependent Variation in Compressive Strengths of Three Posterior Esthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study." International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 6, no. 3 (2016): 63–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1157.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Aim To compare the compressive strengths of composite resins and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) at different times. Materials and methods A total of 36 samples were prepared, 12 samples of each group, composite resins Filtek Z 250, Filtek Z 350, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Compressive strengths of specimens were measured after 1, 24 hours, and 7 days. Test was carried out on a “Universal Testing Machine” with cross-head speed of 5 mm/min. Results There was a significant difference between all the three restorative materials. Analysis of variance showed that mean compressive strengths of Z 250 after 1, 24 hours were higher than Z 350 and RMGIC (p < 0.05). The mean compressive strengths were reduced after 7 days in all the three groups, but after 7 days, the values of Z 250 when compared with the Z 350 and RMGIC were higher. Conclusion The study demonstrated that compressive strengths of hybrid composite resins (Z 250) were significantly higher than that of nanocomposites (Z 350) and RMGIC. How to cite this article Sharma A, Mishra P, Mishra SK. Time-dependent Variation in Compressive Strengths of Three Posterior Esthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016;6(3):63-65.
12
Ayudia, Thesi Kurnia, Kuswardani Susari Putri, and Ivony Fitria. "PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN MIKRO PADA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT MIKROFILLER DENGAN RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT (RMGIC) PADA KAVITAS KLAS V GIGI ANTERIOR." Andalas Dental Journal 3, no. 2 (December 3, 2015): 83–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/adj.v3i2.54.
Full textAbstract:
Microleakage defined as the clinically undetectable passage of bacteria, fluids, molecules or ions between a cavity wall and the restorative material. Microleakage tends to occur in Class V cavities. It is caused by marginal adaptation which is more difficult in class V cavities. Microfiller composite resin is developed and indicated for areas that not require a large pressure. As the development of dental materials, it has been developed a composite resin base material that is known as resin-modified glass ionomer cement. This material has purposed to reduce the limitation of conventional glass ionomer cement and take the advantage of the composite resin material.
The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage difference of microfiler composite resin restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in class V anterior teeth cavities. The methode of this study used experimental laboratory through in vitro process . Thirty two class V cavities were prepared on labial surfaces of extracted human anterior teeth. Samples were divided into two groups. Group I included sixteen samples that have had restorated with microfiller composite. Group II included sixteen samples that have had restorated with resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The samples were immersed into aquabides solution for 24 hours. After that, the samples were immersed into 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. All samples sectioned longitudinally and analyzed for microleakage as dye penetration using a stereomicroscope.
Student t-test were used for statistical analysis. The resulting data showed no significantly difference between two groups.
Key Word : Microleakage, microfiller composite resin, resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), class V cavities.
13
Felemban, Nayef H., and Mohamed I. Ebrahim. "Effects of adding silica particles on certain properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement." European Journal of Dentistry 10, no. 02 (April 2016): 225–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.178318.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of incorporation of silica particles with different concentrations on some properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC): Microleakage, compressive strength, tensile strength, water sorption, and solubility. Materials and Methods: Silica particle was incorporated into RMGIC powder to study its effects, one type of RMGIC (Type II visible light-cured) and three concentrations of silica particles (0.06, 0.08, and 0.1% weight) were used. One hundred and twenty specimens were fabricated for measuring microleakage, compressive strength, tensile strength, water sorption, and solubility. Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests were used for measuring significance between means where P ≤ 0.05. Results: RMGIC specimens without any additives showed significantly highest microleakage and lowest compressive and tensile strengths. Conclusion: Silica particles added to RMGIC have the potential as a reliable restorative material with increased compressive strength, tensile strength, and water sorption but decreased microleakage and water solubility.
14
Popescu, Sanda Mihaela, Mihaela Jana Ţuculină, Horia Octavian Manolea, Veronica Mercuţ, and Monica Scrieciu. "Randomized Clinical Trial of Adhesive Restorations in Non Carious Cervical Lesions." Key Engineering Materials 695 (May 2016): 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.695.3.
Full textAbstract:
AIM: To evaluate the clinical performance of adhesive restorations of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC) compared with of resin composite (RC), and RMGIC liner base laminated with a resin composite in non carious cervical lesions (NCCL).METHODS: The randomized clinical trial included 45 patients (25-65 year-old), with at least two similar sized NCCL on premolars. After sample size calculation, 220 restorations were placed, according to one of the following groups: (G1) Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer); (G2) a resin composite and an adhesive layer (Versaflo); (G3) RMGIC liner base laminated with a resin composite (Vitremer and Versaflo). The restorations were clinically followed every 6 months for up to 24 months using the USPHS modified criteria for clinical evaluation. Survival estimates for restoration longevity were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test (P< 0.05) was used to compare the differences in the success rate according to the type of the restorative material.RESULTS: At the end of 24 months, 172 restorations were evaluated in 37 patients, with a recall rate of 82.22%. The type of restorative material used did not influence the longevity of the restorations. The survival rates for the follow-up were similar regarding the number of restored surfaces and the tooth (upper or lower premolar). Estimated survival rates of the restorations were 100%, 100%, 98,25% and 90,69% at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of clinical evaluations, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between RMGIC and RC or RMGIC laminated with RC for color match, but no other significant difference was observed among the three types of restorations.CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates were similar for the three types of restorations in NCCL. Different types of materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance in non-carious cervical lesions.
15
Santin, Gabriela Cristina, Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz, Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb, Harley Francisco de Oliveira, Paulo Nelson Filho, and Fábio Lourenço Romano. "Glass Ionomer Cements can be used for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets After Cancer Radiation Treatment?" Brazilian Dental Journal 29, no. 2 (March 2018): 128–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801436.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment present more susceptibility to dental caries and the use of an orthodontic device increases this risk factor due to biofilm accumulation around the brackets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to irradiated permanent teeth of orthodontic brackets bonded with conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement due to the fluoride release capacity of these materials. Ninety prepared human premolars were divided into 6 groups (n=15), according to the bonding material and use or not of radiation: CR: Transbond XT composite resin; RMGIC: Fuji Ortho LC conventional glass ionomer cement; GIC: Ketac Cem Easymix resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The groups were irradiated (I) or non-irradiated (NI) prior to bracket bonding. The specimens were subjected to a fractioned radiation dose of 2 Gy over 5 consecutive days for 6 weeks. After the radiotherapy, the brackets were bonded on the specimens with Transbond XT, Fuji Ortho LC and Ketac Cem Easymix. After 24 h, the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test. The image of enamel surface (classified by Adhesive Remnant Index - ARI) was also evaluated and its frequency was checked among groups/subgroups. The shear bond strength variable was evaluated with ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test. GIC group showed the lowest adhesion values among the groups (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference among non-irradiated and irradiated groups (p>0.05). As for the ARI, the CR-I group showed the highest material retention on enamel surface among the irradiated groups. RMGIC group showed the highest values for shear bond strength and presented ARI acceptable for clinical practices.
16
Herion, Tracy, Jack L. Ferracane, and David A. Covell. "Three Cements Used for Orthodontic Banding of Porcelain Molars." Angle Orthodontist 77, no. 1 (January 1, 2007): 94–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/100505-350r.1.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Objective: Objectives of this study were to (1) compare the mean shear-peel bond strength of orthodontic bands luted to porcelain molar denture teeth with glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), or compomer cement; (2) assess the amount of cement remaining on the teeth after debanding; and (3) compare the survival times of the cemented bands subject to mechanical fatigue. Materials and Methods: Sixty banded denture teeth (20 per cement group) were used to determine shear-peel bond strength, and 30 banded denture teeth (10 per cement group) were used to determine fatigue survival time. Shear-peel bond strength was determined with a universal testing machine, and groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance. The amount of cement remaining on the teeth after band removal was scored, and a chi-square test was used to compare groups. Fatigue testing was conducted in a ball mill, and a log-rank test was used to compare differences in survival times. Results: No differences were found in mean shear-peel bond strength among the three groups. The amount of cement remaining on the teeth varied between the compomer and GIC groups (P = .01), with more compomer cement remaining relative to GIC. The mean survival times of bands cemented with compomer or RMGIC were longer than for bands cemented with GIC (P < .001). Conclusion: The findings show that on porcelain teeth the band cements have comparable mean shear-peel bond strengths, but that band retention with RMGIC and compomer cement are superior to GIC when subjected to simulated mechanical fatigue.
17
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo, Linda Wang, Liliam Lucia Carrara Paes de Mello, Janaína Lima dos Santos, Jean Rodrigo dos Santos, and José Roberto Pereira Lauris. "Water sorption of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements photoactivated with LED." Brazilian Oral Research 20, no. 4 (December 2006): 342–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242006000400011.
Full textAbstract:
The Light Emitting Diodes (LED) technology has been used to photoactivate composite resins and there is a great number of published studies in this area. However, there are no studies regarding resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC), which also need photoactivation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate water sorption of two RMGIC photoactivated with LED and to compare this property to that obtained with a halogen light curing unit. A resin composite was used as control. Five specimens of 15.0 mm in diameter x 1.0 mm in height were prepared for each combination of material (Fuji II LC Improved, Vitremer, and Filtek Z250) and curing unit (Radii and Optilight Plus) and transferred to desiccators until a constant mass was obtained. Then the specimens were immersed into deionized water for 7 days, weighed and reconditioned to a constant mass in desiccators. Water sorption was calculated based on weight and volume of specimens. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Specimens photocured with LED presented significantly more water sorption than those photocured with halogen light. The RMGIC absorbed statistically significant more water than the resin composite. The type of light curing unit affected water sorption characteristics of the RMGIC.
18
Daou, Maha, Bruno Tavernier, and Jean-Marc Meyer. "Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of Three Restorative Materials in Primary Molars." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 34, no. 1 (September 1, 2009): 53–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.1.h4p6141065388h0h.
Full textAbstract:
A variety of alternatives to amalgam are now available for use in Class I and Class II restorations in primary teeth, including glass ionomer cements, compomers and resin modified glass ionomer cements(RMGIC). Objectives: This study evaluated the two-year clinical performance of three restorative dental materials: A resin modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji IILC), a compomer (Dyract AP) and a high viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX), in primary molars of pediatric patients with high caries risk activity and compared these results to those reported for amalgam restorations. Study design: One hundred and forty nine Class I and Class II cavities in 45 patients aged 6 to 8 years were restored with compomer, glass ionomer cements and amalgam. Restorations were evaluated according to modified Ryge criteria by two examiners at baseline, and after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of oral function. The data was submitted to statistical analysis (binomial and hyper geometric tests, p<0.05). Results: Two-year recall rate was 62.42%. Class I performed better than class II restorations. The difference in marginal discoloration between compomer and amalgam restorations was statistically significant (p=0.014). No other significant differences were found between GIC, compomer and amalgam restorations. The clinical performance of the three restorative materials compared to amalgam in Class I and Class II cavities at two-year recall was acceptable.Conclusions: The results, even in a population with high caries risk activity, suggest that these materials are suitable alternatives to amalgam in Class I and Class II restorations in primary teeth.
19
Prabhaker, A. R., O. S. Raju, Ameet J. Kurthukoti, and V. Satish. "Evaluation of the Clinical Behavior of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Molars: A Comparative One-year Study." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 9, no. 2 (2008): 130–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-9-2-130.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Aim The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) on primary molars with conventional and modified cavity preparations. Methods and Materials Forty-two children, 5-9 years of age, having bilateral initial occlusal caries on the mandibular primary second molars were selected for the study. A split mouth design was employed where conventional Class I cavities with a 90° cavosurface angle were prepared randomly on primary second molars on one side and modified cavities with a 1 mm straight bevel along the cavosurface margin on the contra-lateral side. These cavities were restored with RMGIC. The restorations were evaluated during subsequent visits, for a period of one year. Results At the end of one year, 90% of the restorations survived in the conventional cavity group whereas 100% of the restorations survived in the modified cavity group. Conclusion Incorporation of a bevel in Class I cavities increases the survival rate of RMGIC restorations. There was no significant difference in the clinical behavior between the two groups. However, beveling does contribute to long term clinical success of these restorations. Clinical Significance Incorporation of a straight bevel in conventional cavities will improve the retention of RMGIC by increasing the bonding area and enhancing the desired properties of the material. Citation Prabhakar AR, Raju OS, Kurthukoti AJ, Satish V. Evaluation of the Clinical Behavior of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Molars: A Comparative One-year Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 February;(9)2:130-137.
20
Geerts, Sabine O., Laurence Seidel, Adelin I. Albert, and Audrey M. Gueders. "Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations." International Journal of Dentistry 2010 (2010): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/728453.
Full textAbstract:
This study was designed to evaluate microleakage that appeared on Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) restorations. Sixty class V cavities () were cut on thirty extracted third molars, which were randomly allocated to three experimental groups. All the buccal cavities were pretreated with polyacrylic acid, whereas the lingual cavities were treated with three one-step Self-Etch adhesives, respectively, Xeno III (Dentsply Detrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), iBond exp (Heraeus Kulzer gmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany), and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (3M ESPE AG, Dental products Seefeld, Germany). All cavities were completely filled with RMGIC, teeth were thermocycled for 800 cycles, and leakage was evaluated. Results were expressed as means standard deviations (SDs). Microleakage scores were analysed by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) assuming an ordinal logistic link function. All results were considered to be significant at the 5% critical level (). The results showed that bonding RMGIC to dentin with a Self-Etch adhesive rather than using polyacrylic acid did not influence microleakage scores (), except for one tested Self-Etch adhesive, namely, Xeno III (). Nevertheless, our results did not show any significant difference between the three tested Self-Etch adhesive systems. In conclusion, the pretreatment of dentin with Self-Etch adhesive system, before RMGIC filling, seems to be an alternative to the conventional Dentin Conditioner for the clinicians as suggested by our results (thermocycling) and others (microtensile tests).
21
Kermanshah, Hamid, Ladan R. Omrani, Omid Hemati, Prham Pedram, and Elham Ahmadi. "Modified Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer to Composite Resin Using Universal Adhesive in Self-etch and Total-etch Modes." Open Dentistry Journal 14, no. 1 (August 18, 2020): 390–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010390.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Glass Ionomer Cements (GICs) are frequently used as base or liner before the application of restorative materials. The success of this approach depends on the bond strength of GICs to composite resin. Objectives: This study to assess the modified microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer to composite resin using universal adhesive in self-etch and total-etch modes. Methods: Samples were fabricated of resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) and conventional GIC(CGIC) (6 x 1 x 1 mm), and were randomly divided into 8 groups. Clearfil SE Bond and G-Premio universal adhesive in self-etch and total-etch modes were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Z250 composite was applied over the GIC (12 x 1 x 1 mm), and light-cured. The microtensile bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. The samples in each group were evaluated under an electron microscope to determine the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Results: The microtensile bond strength of RMGI used with Clearfil SE Bond was significantly higher than that of other groups (6.57±1.15 MPa) (P<0.05). The maximum and minimum microtensile bond strength values of CGIC after applying the bonding agents were recorded after using G-Premio total-etch mode (1.34±0.77 MPa) and SE Bond in total-etch mode(1.18±79 MPa), respectively. Conclusion: Application of of G-Premio in both modes did not show any significant different bond strength in both glass ionomers. The bond strength of RMGIC was higher than that of CGIC, and the maximum bond strength of RMGI was achieved by the use of SE Bond.
22
Trairatvorakul, Chutima, Napassorn Kangvansurakit, and Jarinya Pathomburi. "In vitro Comparison of Self versus Professionally Applied Remineralizing Materials." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 34, no. 4 (July 1, 2010): 323–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.4.p35436j05010u562.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: To compare the effect of 4 remineralizing materials on the incipient artificial carious lesion and its proximal sound enamel when used with fluoride dentifrice. Study Design: Models mimicking proximal contact were made, each of which was placed with an artificial carious specimen in contact with a sound enamel specimen. Each carious specimen was treated with one of four materials: glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), 5000 ppm sodium fluoride (F-gel), and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP). The GIC and RMGIC specimens were thermocycled. Then all specimens were pH-cycled for 5 days with twice a day soaking in 1,000 ppm NaF dentifrice solution. Specimens were examined by polarized light microscopy and lesion area quantified by image analysis. Results: RMGIC significantly yielded smaller areas of lesion than CPP-ACP and GIC (p<0.05). F-gel reduced more area of lesion than CPP-ACP significantly (p<0.05). In the associated contact, RMGIC significantly reduced the area of lesion better than CPP-ACP (p<0.05). Conclusions: The most effective remineralizing material in reducing the carious lesion areas was RMGIC followed by F-gel, GIC and CPP-ACP. The demineralization inhibitory effects on the associated sound contact enamel followed the same trend.
23
Saveanu, Catalina Iulia, Daniela Anistoroaei, Alexandra Ecaterina Saveanu, Oana Dragos, and Loredana Golovcencu. "Enamel Conditioning Effect on Hybridisation of Resin Modiffied Glass Ionomer-Based into Preventive Sealing." Materiale Plastice 56, no. 3 (September 30, 2019): 563–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.37358/mp.19.3.5230.
Full textAbstract:
Disadvantages of diacrilic composite resins and glass ionomers cements have stimulated research to develop hybrid materials to eliminate the downsides and take advantage of their benefits. The purpose of this study was three-dimensional analysis of a flux material with a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement in preventive sealing by two techniques of enamel substrate approach, respectively, with acidic conditioning with 37% orthophosphoric acid and free. The best results were observed in the RMGI when no substrate conditioning was performed.
24
Genaro, Luis Eduardo, Giovana Anovazzi, Josimeri Hebling, and Angela Cristina Cilense Zuanon. "Glass Ionomer Cement Modified by Resin with Incorporation of Nanohydroxyapatite: In Vitro Evaluation of Physical-Biological Properties." Nanomaterials 10, no. 7 (July 19, 2020): 1412. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071412.
Full textAbstract:
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) has important properties. However, like other restorative materials, it has limitations such as decreased biocompatibility. The incorporation of nanoparticles (NP) in the RMGIC resulted in improvements in some of its properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical-biological properties of RMGIC with the addition of nanohydroxyapatite (HANP). Material and Methods: Vitremer RMGIC was used, incorporating HANP by amalgamator, vortex and manual techniques, totaling ten experimental groups. The distribution and dispersion of the HANP were evaluated qualitatively by field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM-FEG). The evaluation of image porosity (SEM-FEG) with the help of imageJ. Cell viability 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazoline bromide (MTT) and cell morphology analyses were performed on MDPC-23 odontoblastoid cells at 24 and 72 h. Results: It was possible to observe good dispersion and distribution of HANP in the samples in all experimental groups. The incorporation of 5% HANP into the vortex stirred RMGIC resulted in fewer pores. The increase in the concentration of HANP was directly proportional to the decrease in cytotoxicity. Conclusions: It is concluded that the use of a vortex with the incorporation of 5% HANP is the most appropriate mixing technique when considering the smallest number of pores inside the material. A higher concentration of HANP resulted in better cell viability, suggesting that this association is promising for future studies of new restorative materials.
25
Mendonça, Adriano Augusto Melo de, Camila Fávero de Oliveira, Josimeri Hebling, and Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa. "Influence of thicknesses of smear layer on the transdentinal cytotoxicity and bond strength of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement." Brazilian Dental Journal 23, no. 4 (2012): 379–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402012000400012.
Full textAbstract:
This study evaluated the transdentinal cytotoxicity (TC) and the bond strength (BS) of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) applied to dentin covered with smear layer (SL) of different thicknesses. Forty dentin discs had thick (TSL) or thin (THSL) smear layer created on their occlusal side. In artificial pulp chambers, MDPC-23 cells were seeded on the pulpal side of the dentin discs and divided into five groups: G1TC: no treatment (control); G2TC: TSL + RMGIC; G3TC: THSL + RMGIC; G4TC: TSL removal + RMGIC; G5TC: THSL removal + RMGIC. After 24 h, cell metabolism and morphology were evaluated by the methyltetrazolium (MTT) assay and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. For BS, the following groups were determined: G1BS: TSL removal + RMGIC; G2BS: THSL removal + RMGIC; G3BS: TSL + RMGIC; G4BS: THSL + RMGIC. Shear bond strength was tested to failure in a mechanical testing machine MTS (0.5 mm/min). Statistically significant difference was observed only between the control and experimental groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.05). The metabolic activity of the viable MDPC-23 cells in G2TC, G3TC, G4TC and G5TC decreased by 54.85%, 60.79%, 64.12% and 62.51%, respectively. Mean shear bond strength values for G1BS, G2BS, G3BS and G4BS were 7.5, 7.4, 6.4 and 6.7 MPa, respectively, without significant difference among them (ANOVA, p>0.05). RMGIC presented moderate transdentinal cytotoxic effects. Maintenance or removal of smear layer did not affect the bond strength of RMGIC to dentin substrate.
26
Shinde, Sachin V., Nagaraj Rashmi, Ahmed A. Moiz, Tarun Vyas, and Guneet Guram. "Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements, and Composite as a Coronal Barrier: An in vitro Microbiological Study." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 19, no. 3 (2018): 292–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2255.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Aim The purpose of the study is to evaluate the bacterial microleakage of three different materials, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and flowable composite, as a coronal barrier against Enterococcus faecalis. Materials and methods A total of 100 human extracted single-rooted teeth were selected. Access opening done, working length determined, and canals were cleaned and shaped with ProTaper F3 and obturated with AH26 and gutta-percha (GP) using lateral condensation technique. Samples were divided into three experimental and two control groups. Approximately 3 mm GP was removed from the coronal orifice and restored with one of the test materials. Teeth were suspended in glass tubes containing brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and equipped with microcaps, which were used to check bacterial leakage. A 24-hour broth of E. faecalis was placed in the pulp chamber. Tubes were incubated and checked for turbidity for 90 days. Data were analyzed using chi-squared test between the test and control groups and Fisher test between the test groups. Results Significantly lesser number of samples turned turbid in the RMGIC group followed by MTA group and the maximum number of samples turned turbid in the flowable composite group. Conclusion The RMGIC is a better coronal sealer, followed by MTA and flowable composite. Clinical significance Coronal sealing ability of RMGIC is more promising in comparison with the other agents. How to cite this article Rashmi N, Shinde SV, Moiz AA, Vyas T, Shaik JA, Guram G. Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements, and Composite as a Coronal Barrier: An in vitro Microbiological Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(3):292-295.
27
Soares, Luís Eduardo Silva, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Sídnei Nahórny, Ana Maria do Espírito Santo, and Airton Abrahão Martin. "Micro Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluoresence Mapping of Enamel and Dental Materials after Chemical Erosion." Microscopy and Microanalysis 18, no. 5 (October 2012): 1112–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1431927612001535.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractEnergy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence was employed to test the hypothesis that beverage consumption or mouthwash utilization will change the chemical properties of dental materials and enamel mineral content. Bovine enamel samples (n = 45) each received two cavity preparations (n = 90), each pair filled with one of three dental materials (R: nanofilled composite resin; GIC: glass-ionomer cement; RMGIC: resin-modified GIC). Furthermore, they were treated with three different solutions (S: saliva; E: erosion/Pepsi Twist®; or EM: erosion+mouthwash/Colgate Plax®). It was found that mineral loss in enamel was greater in GICE samples than in RE > RMGICE > RMGICEM > REM > GICEM. An increased percentage of Zr was found in REM indicating organic matrix degradation. Dental materials tested (R, GIC, and RMGIC) were not able to protect adjacent enamel from acid erosion by the soft drink tested. The use of mouthwash promoted protection of enamel after erosion by the soft drink. To avoid chemical dissolution by mouthwashes, protection by resin composites with surface sealants is recommended.
28
Bayindir, Yusuf Ziya, and Mehmet Yildiz. "Surface Hardness Properties of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements and Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 5, no. 4 (2004): 42–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-5-4-42.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In this study the top and bottom surface hardness of two polyacid-modified composite resins (PMCRs), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and one composite resin were evaluated. The affect of water storage on their hardness was also investigated. The study was conducted using four different groups, each having five specimens obtained from fiberglass die molds with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 2 mm. Measurements were made on the top and bottom surface of each specimen and recorded after 24 hours and again at 60 days. All tested materials showed different hardness values, and the values of top surfaces of the specimens were found to be higher than the bottom surface in all test groups. There was no statistical difference in the Vickers hardness (HV) values when the test specimens were kept in water storage. In conclusion Hytac displayed microhardness values higher than Vitremer and Dyract. We found the order of HV values to be Surfil > Hytac > Dyract > Vitremer, respectively. Vitremer presented the lowest microhardness level and Surfil the highest. Citation Bayindir YZ, Yildiz M. Surface Hardness Properties of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements and Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 November;(5)4:042-049.
29
Nguyen, KV, RH Wong, J. Palamara, and MF Burrow. "The Effect of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement Base and Bulk-fill Resin Composite on Cuspal Deformation." Operative Dentistry 41, no. 2 (March 1, 2016): 208–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/14-331-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Objectives: This study investigated cuspal deformation in teeth restored with different types of adhesive materials with and without a base. Methods: Mesio-occluso-distal slot cavities of moderately large dimension were prepared on extracted maxillary premolars (n=24). Teeth were assigned to one of four groups and restored with either a sonic-activated bulk-fill resin composite (RC) (SonicFill), or a conventional nanohybrid RC (Herculite Ultra). The base materials used were a flowable nanofilled RC (Premise Flowable) and a high-viscosity resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Riva Light-Cure HV). Cuspal deflection was measured with two direct current differential transformers, each contacting a buccal and palatal cusp. Cuspal movements were recorded during and after restoration placement. Data for the buccal and palatal cusp deflections were combined to give the net cuspal deflection. Results: Data varied widely. All teeth experienced net inward cuspal movement. No statistically significant differences in cuspal deflection were found among the four test groups. Conclusions: The use of a flowable RC or an RMGIC in closed-laminate restorations produced the same degree of cuspal movement as restorations filled with only a conventional nanohybrid or bulk-fill RC.
30
Sulaiman, TA, AA Abdulmajeed, A. Altitinchi, SN Ahmed, and TE Donovan. "Effect of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Dispensing/Mixing Methods on Mechanical Properties." Operative Dentistry 43, no. 4 (July 1, 2018): E158—E165. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/17-166-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Statement of the Problem: Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIs) are often used for luting indirect restorations. Hand-mixing traditional cements demands significant time and may be technique sensitive. Efforts have been made by manufacturers to introduce the same cement using different dispensing/mixing methods. It is not known what effects these changes may have on the mechanical properties of the dental cement. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties (diametral tensile strength [DTS], compressive strength [CS], and fracture toughness [FT]) of RMGIs with different dispensing/mixing systems. Methods and Materials: The RMGI specimens (n=14)—RelyX Luting (hand mix), RelyX Luting Plus (clicker–hand mix), RelyX Luting Plus (automix) (3M ESPE), GC Fuji PLUS (capsule-automix), and GC FujiCEM 2 (automix) (GC)—were prepared for each mechanical test and examined after thermocycling (n=7/subgroup) for 20,000 cycles to the following: DTS, CS (ISO 9917-1) and FT (ISO standard 6872; Single-edge V-notched beam method). Specimens were mounted and loaded with a universal testing machine until failure occurred. Two-/one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey honestly significantly different post hoc test was used to analyze data for statistical significance (p<0.05). Results: The interaction effect of both dispensing/mixing method and thermocycling was significant only for the CS test of the GC group (p<0.05). The different dispensing/mixing methods had no effect on the DTS of the tested cements. The CS of GC Fuji PLUS was significantly higher than that of the automix version (p<0.05). The FT decreased significantly when switching from RelyX (hand mix) to RelyX Luting Plus (clicker–hand mix) and to RelyX Luting Plus (automix) (p<0.05). Except in the case of the DTS of the GC group and the CS of GC Fuji PLUS, thermocycling had a significant effect reducing the mechanical properties of the RMGI cements (p<0.05). Conclusions: Introducing alternative dispensing/mixing methods for mixing RMGIs to reduce time and technique sensitivity may affect mechanical properties and is brand dependent.
31
Karaman, E., and G. Ozgunaltay. "Cuspal Deflection in Premolar Teeth Restored Using Current Composite Resins With and Without Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Liner." Operative Dentistry 38, no. 3 (April 1, 2013): 282–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-400-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Aim: To evaluate the effects of four different types of composite resins and a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner on the cuspal deflection of large MOD cavities in vitro. Materials & Methods: One hundred twenty-eight extracted human upper premolar teeth were used. After the teeth were divided into eight groups (n=16), standardized large MOD cavities were prepared. The distance between cusp tips was measured before and after the cavity preparations with a digital micrometer. Then the teeth were restored with different resin composites (Filtek Supreme XT, Filtek P60, Filtek Z250, Filtek Silorane - 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) with and without a RMGIC liner (Vitrebond, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Cuspal deflection was measured 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h after the completion of restorations. The data were statistically analyzed with Friedman and Kruskal Wallis tests. Results: A significant reduction in cuspal deflection was observed in Filtek Silorane restorations with and without RMGIC liner (p<0.05). In all restored teeth, the distance between cusps was reduced but they did not return to their original positions during the 48 h period. All teeth showed cuspal deflection, but placement of RMGIC liner reduced it. Conclusion: The use of silorane-based composites and the placement of RMGIC liner under the composite resin restorations resulted in significantly reduced cuspal deflection.
32
Santiago, Sérgio Lima, Vanara Florêncio Passos, Alessandra Helen Magacho Vieira, Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro, José Roberto Pereira Lauris, and Eduardo Batista Franco. "Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions." Brazilian Dental Journal 21, no. 3 (2010): 229–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402010000300010.
Full textAbstract:
This controlled clinical trial evaluated the 2-year clinical performance of a one-bottle etch-and-rinse adhesive and resin composite system (Excite/Tetric Ceram) compared to a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Vitremer/3M) in non-carious cervical lesions. Seventy cervical restorations (35 resin composite - RC- restorations and 35 RMGIC restorations) were placed by a single operator in 30 patients under rubber dam isolation without mechanical preparation. All restorations were evaluated blindly by 2 independent examiners using the modified USPHS criteria at baseline, and after 6, 12 and 24 months. Data were analyzed statistically by Fisher's exact and McNemar tests. After 2 years, 59 out of 70 restorations were evaluated. As much as 78.8% retention rate was recorded for RC restorations, while 100% retention was obtained for RMGIC restorations. Fisher's exact test showed significant differences (p=0.011) for retention. However, there were no significant differences for marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, anatomic form and secondary caries between the RC and RMGIC restorations. The McNemar test detected significant differences for Excite/TC between baseline and the 2-year recall for retention (p=0.02), marginal integrity (p=0.002) and anatomic form (p=0.04). Therefore, the one-bottle etch-and-rinse bonding system/resin composite showed an inferior clinical performance compared to the RMGIC.
33
Ghazy, MH, MM Aboumadina, and SH Mahmoud. "Retentiveness of Metal Coping Luted to Teeth of Uremic Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Using Five Different Luting Cements." Operative Dentistry 39, no. 3 (April 1, 2014): E101—E108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/12-523-lr2.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Objectives This study aimed to assess the retention of metal copings luted to uremic teeth with five different luting agents. Methods A total of 35 sound natural molars was collected from uremic patients and randomly assigned into five groups (n=7). The teeth were prepared for metal copings using diamond tips and water coolant. Metal copings with a loop on the occlusal surface were fabricated using base metal alloy (Rexillium III). The copings were luted using Fuji I, glass ionomer (GI); Fuji Plus, resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI); Panavia F 2.0, resin cement; Rely X Unicem, self-adhesive cement (SA); and Adhesor, zinc phosphate cement (ZPh). All specimens were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, conditioned in artificial saliva for 7 days, and then thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5°C-55°C). The dislodging force was measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The mode of failure of the loaded adhesive copings was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test. Results GI and SA cements had the highest and the lowest mean retentive strength, respectively (580.90±17.3, 406.6±12.7). There was no significant difference between ZPh, SA, and resin cements. These cements were inferior to GI and RMGI cements (p<0.05), which showed statistically similar retentive strengths. Conclusions The results of this study support the use of glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements for luting of metal copings to uremic teeth with retentive preparations.
34
Panahandeh, Narges, Fatemeh Adinehlou, Seyedeh Mahsa Sheikh-Al-Eslamian, and Hassan Torabzadeh. "Extract of Propolis on Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: Effect on Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties and Dentin Bonding Strength." International Journal of Biomaterials 2021 (April 12, 2021): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5597837.
Full textAbstract:
This study assessed the effect of addition of aqueous extract of propolis in different concentrations on the mechanical and antimicrobial properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). In this in vitro study, powder of Fuji II LC RMGIC was mixed with 25% and 50% aqueous extracts of propolis. Samples (n = 15 for shear bond strength, n = 5 for flexural strength, and n = 20 for the antibacterial activity test) were fabricated using this mixture. The buccal and lingual surfaces of 23 premolars were ground to expose dentin. Tygon tubes were filled with cement, bonded to dentin, and subjected to bond or the flexural strength test in a universal testing machine. Antibacterial activity was assessed using the disc diffusion and well-plate techniques against S. mutans. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. The three groups showed significant differences ( p < 0.001). The 50% propolis group had the lowest flexural and shear bond strength. The control group had the highest flexural and shear bond strength. No growth inhibition zone was noted around any of the discs. It can be concluded that addition of propolis to RMGIC did not confer any antibacterial activity against S. mutans and decreased the flexural and shear bond strength of RMGIC.
35
Shirazi, Maryam, and Mahsa Sadeghi. "The evaluation of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with the addition of 45S5 bioactive glass using two conventional methods." Journal of Oral Research 9, no. 4 (August 30, 2020): 250–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2020.066.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: There is a high prevalence of enamel caries around brackets due to the young age of the majority of orthodontic patients, and to the difficulty of plaque removal in presence of orthodontic appliances. Recently, protective agents such as bioactive glasses (BGs) were introduced to enhance remineralization and prevent demineralization of tooth structures. This study aimed to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with addition of 45S5 BG to enhance its remineralizing potential using two conventional methods. Material and methods: This in-vitro experimental study evaluated three groups (n=20) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using Transbond XT (group 1), light-cure RMGIC (group 2) and RMGIC with BG added (group 3). Samples underwent 7000 thermal cycles and their SBS was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was also determined. Quantitative data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA while qualitative data were analyzed using a chi-square test. Discussion: The results showed no significant difference in SBS between study groups, however the ARI scores were significantly different among the groups. The RMGIC group showed the highest ARI while RMGIC doped with BG showed the lowest ARI score. Conclusion: Addition of 30% w/v 45S5 BG to RMGIC does not cause a significant change in SBS of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel, while resulting in less amount of luting agent remnants on the enamel surface after debonding.
36
Sabatini, Camila, Manthan Patel, and Eric D'Silva. "In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates." Operative Dentistry 38, no. 2 (March 1, 2013): 186–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-317-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Objective To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to different prosthodontic substrates. Materials and Methods The substrates base metal, noble metal, zirconia, ceramic, and resin composite were used for bonding with different cements (n=12). Specimens were placed in a bonding jig, which was filled with one of four cements (RelyX Unicem, Multilink Automix, Maxcem Elite, and FujiCEM Automix). Both light-polymerizing (LP) and self-polymerizing (SP) setting reactions were tested. Shear bond strength was measured at 15 minutes and 24 hours in a testing device at a test speed of 1 mm/min and expressed in MPa. A Student t-test and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate differences between setting reactions, between testing times, and among cements irrespective of other factors. Generalized linear regression model and Tukey tests were used for multifactorial analysis. Results Significantly higher mean SBS were demonstrated for LP mode relative to SP mode (p<0.001) and for 24 hours relative to 15 minutes (p<0.001). Multifactorial analysis revealed that all factors (cement, substrate, and setting reaction) and all their interactions had a significant effect on the bond strength (p<0.001). Resin showed significantly higher SBS than other substrates when bonded to RelyX Unicem and Multilink Automix in LP mode (p<0.05). Overall, FujiCEM demonstrated significantly lower SBS than the three self-adhesive resin cements (p<0.05). Conclusions Overall, higher bond strengths were demonstrated for LP relative to SP mode, 24 hours relative to 15 minutes and self-adhesive resin cements compared to the RMGICs. Bond strengths also varied depending on the substrate, indicating that selection of luting cement should be partially dictated by the substrate and the setting reaction.
37
Alkhudhairy, Fahad, Mustafa Naseem, Zeeshan H. Ahmad, Abrar N. Alnooh, and Fahim Vohra. "Influence of photobio-modulation with an Er,Cr: YSGG laser on dentin adhesion bonded with bioactive and resin-modified glass ionomer cement." Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials 17, no. 4 (October 2019): 228080001988069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2280800019880691.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of bioactive cement (BAC) in comparison to conventional dual cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with Er,Cr:YSGG laser (ECL) dentin photo biomodulation. Methods: One hundred and twenty extracted human molars were allocated in eight groups ( n = 15) based on surface conditioning and cement type. Specimens of groups 2 and 6 were conditioned with ECL whereas, groups 3 and 7 were treated with ECL + ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA). Specimens in groups 4 and 8 were surface conditioned by ECL + EDTA + Tetric-N-Bond, and groups 1 and 5 were considered as control (non-surface treated). Cement build-ups were performed on the surface-treated dentin with BAC (groups 1–4) and RMGIC (groups 5–8). A universal testing machine was used to measure the SBS and the mode of failure was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using an analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test, at a significance level of p < 0.001. Results: The highest SBS values were observed in group 8, ECL + EDTA + Tetric-N-Bond + RMGIC (21.54 ± 3.524 MPa) and the lowest SBS values were displayed by group 1, with no surface treatment and BAC application (11.99 ± 0.821 MPa). The majority of failures were found to be mixed in lased dentin-treated dentin surfaces. BAC when bonded to dentin surfaces conditioned with ECL showed lower SBS in comparison to RMGIC. Conclusion: Conditioning of dentin with ECL and a bonding agent (Tetric-N-bond) improved bond strength scores for BAC and RMGIC. Use of EDTA improved bond strength values when bonded to BAC and RMGIC; however, this improvement was not statistically significant.
38
Sengul, F., and T. Gurbuz. "Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 39, no. 4 (June 1, 2015): 315–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.315.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical success of primary teeth class II lesions restored with different restorative materials [Hybrid Composite Resin (HCR), Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC), compomer, and Giomer Composite Resin (GCR)] followed up for 24 months. Study Design: This study was carried out on 146 primary molars of 41 children in the age range of 5–7 years. The class II lesions in primary molars of a patient were restored using different restorative materials. Restorations were evaluated according to FDI-criteria and their survival rates were determined. Data were analysed with Pearson chi-square, Kaplan-Meier and Wilcoxon (Breslow) tests (α = 0.05). Results: The failure rates of restorative materials were as follows: compomer 33.3%, RMGIC 28.1%, HCR 22.5% and GCR 21.1%. Conclusions: While the functional failure was the most important factor in restorative material failure, RMGIC was the most successful material in terms of biological evaluation criterion and GCR had the longest survival rate.
39
Rodrigues, Raphaela Farias, Suellen Scarcelli Senna, Ana Flávia Soares, Rafael Lia Mondelli, Paulo Silveira Francisconi, and Ana Flávia Sanches Borges. "Marginal adaptation in proximal cavities restored with composites and other materials." Brazilian Dental Science 20, no. 4 (December 15, 2017): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/bds.2017.v20i4.1441.
Full textAbstract:
<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To evaluate the marginal adaptation, in enamel (E) and dentin (D), of composite resin (CR) associated with flowable resin composite (flow), bulk fill flowable base (bulk) and resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in slot cavities. <strong>Material and Methods</strong>: The study was conducted after approval (Protocol No. 21148413.4.0000.5417) from Ethics Committee. Forty extracted human molar teeth were randomly assigned in eight experimental groups: E-CR, E-BULK, E-FLOW, E-RMGIC, D-CR, D-BULK, D-FLOW, D-RMGIC. The occlusal surface was planned, two slot cavities with standard sizes (depth: 2.0 mm, height: 2.5 mm, width: 2.0 mm) were created on a machine for making cavities. The teeth were restored and after 24h subjected to 2000 cyclic loading and sectioned for analysis of marginal adaptation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The micrographs were analyzed with the Image J program to measure the size of marginal gaps. The data were transformed into percentages (%GAPS = LG ÷ LM × 100) and analyzed by 2-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). <strong>Results</strong>: There was a significant difference between different treatments (<em>p<0.01</em>). The groups E-RMGIC (<em>p=0.001</em>) and D-RMGIC (<em>p=0</em>) had the highest percentage of marginal gap. Others groups showed similar percentage of marginal gap <em>(p>0.05)</em>. <strong>Conclusions</strong>: It was concluded that restorations with flowable composite resin and bulk fill liners exhibit the same behavior, but the RMGIC liner increased marginal gap.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Composite resins; Dental marginal adaptation; Glass ionomer cements.</p>
40
Maruo, Ivan Toshio, Juliana Godoy-Bezerra, Armando Yukio Saga, Orlando Motohiro Tanaka, Hiroshi Maruo, and Elisa Souza Camargo. "Effect of etching and light-curing time on the shear bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement." Brazilian Dental Journal 21, no. 6 (2010): 533–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402010000600009.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of etching and light-curing time on the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) upon debonding of orthodontic brackets. Sixty-eight bovine permanent incisors were obtained and embedded in acrylic resin. Edgewise metallic brackets were bonded to the teeth with Fuji Ortho LC RMGIC. The specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups, using the following etching and light-curing times: G1: 10% polyacrylic acid and 40 s (control); G2: 37% phosphoric acid and 40 s; G3: 10% polyacrylic acid and 50 s; and G4: 37% phosphoric acid and 50 s. Shear test was performed at 0.5 mm/min and the ARI was assessed. G2 (3.6 ± 0.98 MPa) presented significantly higher (p<0.05) SBS than G1 (2.76 ± 0.86 MPa) and G4 (2.86 ± 0.68 MPa), and there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between G2 and G3 (2.94 ± 0.67 MPa). ARI presented prevalence of scores 2 and 3 in all groups. RMGIC SBS enhanced with 37% phosphoric acid etching and 40 s light-curing time, but this did not occur when the light-curing time was increased, regardless of the acid used. RMGIC presented prevalence of failures at the adhesive/bracket interface.
41
Jang, Eunjeong, Soyoung Park, Jonghyun Shin, Shin Kim, and Taesung Jeong. "Microleakage Assessment of Resin Infiltration Combined Restoration in Artificial Decalcified-Cavitated Lesion." JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY 47, no. 3 (August 31, 2020): 257–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2020.47.3.257.
Full textAbstract:
This study was performed to evaluate the restoration combined with resin infiltration (RI) of early cavitated smooth surface caries lesion in terms of microleakage. Flowable resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) were compared.Sound 20 extracted 3rd molars were divided into 2 groups randomly. Artificial decalcified lesion was induced. Cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces, and randomly set as experimental and control group. RI was applied to the experimental group before cavity restoration. The control group was restored without RI. In group I and II, flowable resin and RMGIC was used for restoration respectively. After thermocycling and silver nitrate immersion, microleakage was assessed by μ-CT.Depth of microleakage was lower in experimental group than control group only in group II (p = 0.05). Microleakage depth was lower in group II than group I in both experimental and control groups (p = 0.05).RI pretreatment before restoration of early cavitated caries lesions might reduce the microleakage and help long-term maintenance of restoration. In this study, RMGIC was less polymerization shrinkage. Restoration with RMGIC after RI pretreatment reduced the microleakage of the restoration compared to the flowable resin.
42
Mehra, Salil, Ashu K. Gupta, Bhanu Pratap Singh, Mandeep Kaur, and Ashwath Kumar. "To Evaluate Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Theracal Lc, Biodentine, and Resin–Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Mode of Fracture: An In Vitro Study." Dental Journal of Advance Studies 8, no. 02 (May 4, 2020): 49–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712052.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Introduction The aim of the current study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to Theracal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using universal adhesive and mode of fracture. Materials and Methods A total of 50 caries-free maxillary and mandibular molars extracted were taken; occlusal cavities were prepared, mounted in acrylic blocks, and divided into five groups based on the liner used. Group 1: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 12 minutes. Group 2: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 14 days. Group 3: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Group 4: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 7 days. Group 5: Theracal LC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Each sample was bonded to resin composite using universal adhesive. Shear bond strength analysis was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance and posthoc Bonferroni test using SPSS version 22.0. Results and Conclusion Biodentine liner when bonded immediately to resin composite showed minimum shear bond strength. RMGIC when bonded to resin composite after 7 days showed maximum shear bond strength. Mode of fracture was predominantly cohesive in groups having Biodentine and Theracal LC as liner.
43
Ateyah, Nasrien Z., and Nadia Malek Taher. "Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Bonded to Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 8, no. 2 (2007): 25–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-2-25.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to determine in vitro the shear bond strength (MPa) and the type of bond failure when resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) was bonded with different tooth-colored restorative materials. Methods and Materials The RMGIC tested was Fuji II LC (FL) and the tooth-colored restorative materials used were composite resin Point-4 (P4), Compomer Dyract AP (DY), and Ormocere Admira (AD). A total number of 60 FL specimens were prepared using Teflon molds. The specimens were divided into six equal groups. Each group of ten specimens was bonded to a tested tooth-colored restorative material as follows: Group I - etched FL bonded to P4; Group II - non-etched FL bonded to P4; Group III - etched FL bonded to DY; Group IV - non-etched FL bonded to DY; Group V - etched FL bonded to AD; and Group VI - non-etched FL bonded to AD. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The shear bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine, and the fractured surfaces were examined under a stereomicroscope. Results The results of the shear bond strength indicated the lowest mean value (14.46 MPa) was in Group III, and this was significantly different from the values of other groups (p<0.05). However, Groups V and VI recorded the highest mean values (24.5 MPa and 28.39 MPa) which were significantly different (p<0.05) when compared to other groups. Groups I, II, and IV showed no significant difference with mean values of 20.06, 19.99, and 20.1 MPa which were significantly different from other groups (p<0.05). Conclusion AD showed the highest shear bond strength to RMGIC. All groups demonstrated a cohesive failure in FL except for Group IV where a cohesive failure in DY was recorded. AD showed good shear bond strength when laminated with FL. Citation Taher NM, Ateyah NZ. Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Bonded to Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 February;(8)2:025-034.
44
Cook, NB, SA Feitosa, A. Patel, Y. Alfawaz, GJ Eckert, and MC Bottino. "Bonding Ability of Paste-Paste Glass Ionomer Systems to Tooth Structure: In Vitro Studies." Operative Dentistry 40, no. 3 (May 1, 2015): 304–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/14-030-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY This study investigated the effect of nonrinse conditioners (ie, Ketac Nano Primer [KNP] and GC Self Conditioner [SC]) used as substrate pretreatment and their respective paste-paste resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) (ie, Ketac Nano [KN] and Fuji Filling LC [FF]) on microtensile bond strength to dentin and marginal sealing when compared with traditional RMGIC (ie, Photac Fil [PF] and Fuji II LC [FII]) used in association with polyacrylic acid (ie, Ketac Cavity Conditioner [KC] and GC Cavity Conditioner [CC]). A total of 192 extracted human molars were allocated into eight groups: KNP-KN, KC-KN, KNP-PF, KC-PF, SC-FF, CC-FF, SC-FII, and CC-FII. For microtensile bond strength, the teeth were sectioned to expose occlusal dentin and restored according to the group. After 24 hours the teeth were cut to yield nine beams per tooth (±0.8 mm2). Testing was done using a universal testing machine followed by failure mode classification. For microleakage testing, standardized cavity preparations were made on the buccal cementoenamel junction and restored according to the group. The teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 8°C to 48°C), sealed, immersed in methylene blue for 24 hours, and then assessed for microleakage using a stereomicroscope. Microtensile bond strengths in megapascals (mean±SE) were KNP-KN: 14.9 ± 1.6, KC-KN: 17.2 ± 1.5, KNP-PF: 31.2 ± 1.6, KC-PF: 26.2 ± 1.2, SC-FF: 23.6 ± 1.5, SC-FII: 31.2 ± 1.5, and CC-FII: 21.9 ± 1.5. Cervical margins showed more microleakage compared with occlusal margins. Overall, the use of nonrinse conditioners in association with traditional RMGICs demonstrated superior microtensile bond strengths to dentin when compared with the paste-paste RMGICs. Meanwhile, the association between polyacrylic acid (CC) and a traditional RMGIC (FII) led to the least microleakage for cervical locations when compared with all other groups.
45
Webman, Mark, Ezat Mulki, Rosie Roldan, Oscar Arevalo, John F. Roberts, and Franklin Garcia-Godoy. "A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 40, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.1.8.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: To determine the three-year survival rate of Class II resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), Vitremer, restorations in primary molars and to compare these results with measurements of survival of Class II restorations of standard restorative materials. Study Design: Data on Class II restorations placed in primary molars during a six-year period were collected through a chart review and radiographic evaluation in the office of a board-certified pediatric dentist. A radiograph showing that the restoration was intact was required at least 3 years after placement to qualify as successful. If no radiograph existed, the restoration was excluded. If the restoration was not found to be intact radiographically or was charted as having been replaced before three years it was recorded as a failure. The results of this study were then compared to other standard restorative materials using normalized annual failure rates. Results: Of the 1,231 Class II resinmodified glass-ionomer cement restorations placed over six years 427 met the inclusion criteria. There was a 97.42% survival rate for a 3-year period equivalent to an annual failure rate of 0.86%. Conclusions: A novel approach comparing materials showed that in this study Vitremer compared very favorably to previously published success rates of other standard restorative materials (amalgam, composite, stainless steel crown, compomer) and other RMGIC studies.
46
Sauro, Salvatore, Vicente Faus-Matoses, Irina Makeeva, Juan Manuel Nuñez Martí, Raquel Gonzalez Martínez, José Antonio García Bautista, and Vicente Faus-Llácer. "Effects of Polyacrylic Acid Pre-Treatment on Bonded-Dentine Interfaces Created with a Modern Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Subjected to Cycling Mechanical Stress." Materials 11, no. 10 (October 2, 2018): 1884. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11101884.
Full textAbstract:
Objectives: Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) are considered excellent restorative materials with unique therapeutic and anti-cariogenic activity. However, concerns exist regarding the use of polyacrylic acid as a dentine conditioner as it may influence the bonding performance of RMGIC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different protocols for cycling mechanical stress on the bond durability and interfacial ultramorphology of a modern RMGIC applied to dentine pre-treated with/without polyacrylic acid conditioner (PAA). Methods: The RMGIC was applied onto human dentine specimens prepared with silicon-carbide (SiC) abrasive paper with or without the use of a PAA conditioner. The specimens were immersed in deionised water for 24 h then divided in 3 groups. The first group was cut into matchsticks (cross-sectional area of 0.9 mm2) and tested immediately for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). The second was first subjected to load cycling (250,000 cycles; 3 Hz; 70 N) and then cut into matchsticks and tested for MTBS. The third group was subjected to load cycling (250,000 cycles; 3 Hz; 70 N), cut into matchsticks, and then immersed for 8 months storage in artificial saliva (AS); these were finally tested for MTBS. The results were analysed statistically using two-way ANOVA and the Student–Newman–Keuls test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was performed using FE-SEM, while further RMCGIC-bonded dentine specimens were aged as previously described and used for interfacial ultramorphology characterisation (dye nanoleakage) using confocal microscopy. Results: The RMGIC applied onto dentine that received no pre-treatment (10% PAA gel) showed no significant reduction in MTBS after load cycling followed by 8 months of storage in AS (p > 0.05). The RMGIC–dentine interface created in PAA-conditioned SiC-abraded dentine specimens showed no sign of degradation, but with porosities within the bonding interface both after load cycling and after 8 months of storage in AS. Conversely, the RMGIC–dentine interface of the specimens with no PAA pre-treatment showed no sign of porosity within the interface after any of the aging protocols, although some bonded-dentine interfaces presented cohesive cracks within the cement after prolonged AS storage. However, the specimens of this group showed no significant reduction in bond strength (p < 0.05) after 8 months of storage in AS or load cycling (p > 0.05). After prolonged AS storage, the bond strength value attained in RMGIC–dentine specimens created in PAA pre-treated dentine were significantly higher than those observed in the specimens created with no PAA pre-treatment in dentine. Conclusions: PAA conditioning of dentine prior to application of RMGIC induces no substantial effect on the bond strength after short-term storage, but its use may increase the risk of collagen degradation at the bonding interface after prolonged aging. Modern RMGIC applied without PAA dentine pre-treatment may have greater therapeutic synergy with saliva during cycle occlusal load, thereby enhancing the remineralisation and protection of the bonding interface.
47
Pereira, RAS, PBF Soares, AA Bicalho, LM Barcelos, LRS Oliveira, and CJ Soares. "Impact of the Porosity from Incremental and Bulk Resin Composite Filling Techniques on the Biomechanical Performance of Root-Treated Molars." Operative Dentistry 46, no. 2 (March 1, 2021): 197–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/19-297-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Objectives: To analyze the effect of the porosity caused by incremental and bulk resin composite filling techniques using low- and high-viscosity composite resins on the biomechanical performance of root-treated molars. Methods: Forty intact molars received standardized mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavity preparation, were root treated, and randomly divided into four groups with different filling techniques (n=10). The first involved two incremental filling techniques using VIT/Z350XT, a nanofilled composite resin (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) associated with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; Vitremer, 3M ESPE) for filling the pulp chamber. The second involved TPH/VIT, a microhybrid composite resin TPH3 Spectrum associated with Vitremer. The third and fourth involved two bulk-fill composite resins: SDR/TPH, a low-viscosity resin composite (Surefill SDR flow, Dentsply) associated with TPH3 Spectrum, and POST, a high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior, 3M ESPE). The volume of the porosity inside the restoration was calculated by micro-CT. The cusp deformation caused by polymerization shrinkage was calculated using the strain-gauge and micro-CT methods. The cusp deformation was also calculated during 100 N occlusal loading and loading to fracture. The fracture resistance and fracture mode were recorded. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. The fracture mode was analyzed by the χ2 test. The volume of the porosity was correlated with the cusp deformation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode (a=0.05). Results: Incremental filling techniques associated with RMGIC resulted in a significantly higher porosity than that of both bulk-fill techniques. However, no significant difference was found among the groups for the fracture resistance, fracture mode, and cusp deformation, regardless of the measurement time and method used. No correlation was observed between the volume of the porosity and all tested parameters. Conclusions: The porosity of the restorations had no influence on the cuspal deformation, fracture resistance, or fracture mode. The use of the RMGIC for filling the pulp chamber associated with incremental composite resins resulted in similar biomechanical performance to that of the flowable or regular paste bulk-fill composite resin restorations of root-treated molars.
48
Alvarez-Arenal, Angel, Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Hector deLlanos-Lanchares, Aritza Brizuela-Velasco, Javier Pinés-Hueso, and Joseba Ellakuria-Echebarria. "Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses." BioMed Research International 2016 (2016): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2107027.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the retention strength of five cement types commonly used in implant-retained fixed partial dentures, before and after compressive cyclic loading. In five solid abutments screwed to 5 implant analogs, 50 metal Cr-Ni alloy copings were cemented with five luting agents: resin-modified glass ionomer (RmGI), resin composite (RC), glass ionomer (GI), resin urethane-based (RUB), and compomer cement (CC). Two tensile tests were conducted with a universal testing machine, one after the first luting of the copings and the other after 100,000 cycles of 100 N loading at 0.72 Hz. The one way ANOVA test was applied for the statistical analysis using the post hoc Tukey test when required. Before and after applying the compressive load, RmGI and RC cement types showed the greatest retention strength. After compressive loading, RUB cement showed the highest percentage loss of retention (64.45%). GI cement recorded the lowest retention strength (50.35 N) and the resin composite cement recorded the highest (352.02 N). The type of cement influences the retention loss. The clinician should give preference to lower retention strength cement (RUB, CC, and GI) if he envisages any complications and a high retention strength one (RmGI, RC) for a specific clinical situation.
49
Nahsan, Flavia Pardo Salata, Martha Beteghelli Michielin, Luciana Mendonça Da Silva, Camila Moreira Machado, Andréa Mello De Andrade, Paulo Afonso da Silveira Francisconi, Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli, and Linda Wang. "Bond strength of a resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement associated or not with chlorhexidine to eroded dentin." Brazilian Dental Science 18, no. 2 (May 15, 2015): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/bds.2015.v18i2.1101.
Full textAbstract:
<p><strong>Objective</strong>: Even resin composites and glass-ionomer cements are widely used for dental cervical region restorations, under erosive condition they can wear out quickly. This study aimed to compare, by means of bond strength by microshear, the performance of a resin composite (RC) and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) to eroded dentin and its association with 2% chlorhexidine up to 6 months. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>:. Eighty sound third molars teeth were cutt to obtain flat coronal dentin, which were subsequently embedded in self-curing acrylic resin circular molds exposing only this surface available. Teeth were divided into two groups, according to the treatment with the Adper Single Bond 2 + RC Filtek Z250 (Z) or the RMGIC Vitremer (V). Half of the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva-AS for 24 hours (control groups) and half subjected to 3x/1 minute daily immersion in Regular Coca Cola ®-RC for 5 days. Half of the specimens for each described condition were treated with water and half with 2% chlorhexidine for 1 minute prior the restoration. For all groups, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva weekly renewed up to tests. The bonding strength was evaluated by microshear test after 1 month and 6 months . Data, in normal distribution, were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA and Tukey (p <0.05). <strong>Results</strong>: Challenge factors, materials and time were statistically significant.. Restorations with Z showed significantly higher bond strength compared to V in all situations. There was a reduction in bond strength values over time for all tested conditions. The prior application of 2% chlorhexidine was able to preserve the Z bond strength between 1 and 6 months, but this factor was not statistically significant. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: For eroded dentin, the use of resin composite seems presents greater bond strength compared to resin-modified glass-material, disregarding their association to chlorhexidine or not.</p>
50
Dursun, E., S. Le Goff, DN Ruse, and JP Attal. "Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer." Operative Dentistry 38, no. 3 (April 1, 2013): 275–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-501-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to polyalkenoic acid–preconditioned dentin after 24 hours, six months, and 12 months of water storage at 37°C. Materials and Methods Cylindrical molds, placed on flat, polyalkenoic acid (Cavity Conditioner® [GC]) preconditioned dentin surfaces of 90 human teeth embedded in resin, were filled with Fuji II LC® (GC), a RMGIC, with (n=45) or without (n=45) the prior application of a 0.05% CHX solution. Within each group, SBS was determined after 24 hours (n=15), six months (n=15), and 12 months (n=15) of storage in water at 37°C. The results were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey multiple means comparisons (p<0.05). The type of bond failure (adhesive/cohesive/mixed) was noted and the results were analyzed with chi-square test (p<0.05). Results After 24 hours, the SBS of RMGIC was not significantly different with (9.0 ± 2.8 MPa) or without (8.3±0.6 MPa) the application of CHX. After six months, however, SBS increased significantly in the group without CHX (12.7±3.4 MPa) but remained unchanged in the CHX group (9.4±4.0 MPa). Similar results without CHX (12.6±3.8 MPa) and with CHX (9.5±3.2 MPa) were obtained after 12 months. No significant differences in the type of debonding were found between the various groups tested. Conclusion The application of 0.05% CHX after dentin preconditioning did not seem to have affected the 24-hour SBS of RMGIC. However, the six- and 12-month SBS was significantly lower for CHX-treated samples, possibly as a result of CHX interference with both the bonding mechanism and the maturation reaction of RMGIC.