Academic literature on the topic 'Resin-modified glass ionomer. eng'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Resin-modified glass ionomer. eng.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer. eng"
1
Alkhodairi, Asem, Moahmmad Alseweed, Sulaiman Alwashmi, and Ramy Elmoazen. "Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Resin and Glass Ionomer Sealants Applied as a Part of School-Based Caries Prevention Program." Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 7, no. 23 (December 13, 2019): 4127–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.869.
Full textAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Using of sealant on pits and fissures is likely one of the most generally well-known strategies by the new cavity-prevention systems.
AIM: The purpose of this research is to measure the retentiveness of sealants of resin-modified ionomer glass cement (GIC) and resin pits and fissures, on the first permanent molars of special patients as a part of caries prevention program in schools.
METHODS: The sample was comprised by 60 molars. Resin-based sealants on one side and glass-ionomer sealant on the contralateral side of the mouth. The molars were examined in three and six months after application for retention with three standards: TR: Totally Retained; PR: Partially Retained; and CL: Completely Lost.
RESULTS: by the end of the study 60% of resin sealant was present. While 55% of GIC were retentive after 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Resin sealants are more retentive than glass ionomer sealants in school-based carries prevention program.
2
Khan, Hannan Humayun, Mafaza Alam, Syed Muzammil Hussain Shah, Saman Mehmood, Ajmal Yousaf, and Pir Jawad Ali Shah. "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FREQUENCY OF RETENTION OF FLOWABLE NANOCLUSTER COMPOSITE AND RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER." PAFMJ 71, no. 1 (February 24, 2021): 299–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i1.2598.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: To investigate and compare the retention rates of Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite and Resinmodified-Glass-Ionomers in non-carious cervical lesions in maxillary molars.
Study Design: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Operative Dentistry, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry,Rawalpindi, from Jan 2017 to Dec 2018.
Methodology: Male patients ranging from 30-40 years with moderate non-carious cervical lesions of maxillarypremolars and molars of either quadrant presenting to out-patient department were selected through convenience sampling. These lesions were restored with Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite and Resin-Modified-GlassIonomer. Retention of these two materials over the period of 6 months, 1 year and 2 years was noted. Chi square statistics were used to compare groups.
Results: The retention of Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite was 92% in 6 months, 85% in one year and 81% in two years. Whereas, for resin-modified-glass-ionomer restorations, the frequency of retention of the filling material was 97% at 6 months, 93% at one year and 89% at two years period. Out of the total 74 resin-modified-glassionomers restorations, 8 (11%) had dislodged by the end of the second year as compared to 14 (19%) dislodged restorations for Flowable-Nanocluster-Composite.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the study reveals that resin modified glass-ionomer has a superior retention rate over the period of two years as compared to Flowable-Nanocluster Composite. A dentist should have an insight into compositions of restorative materials for the longevity of their retention in various lesions.
3
Torres-Rivera, Zady J., Juan Augusto Fernández-Tarazona, and Alex Sandro de Souza. "Influence of dentin conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the shear bond strength of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement." Journal of Oral Research 9, no. 4 (August 30, 2020): 319–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2020.073.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of dentin conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the shear bond strength of the nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement Ketac N100 (3MESPE). Material and methods: Eighteen bovine incisors were randomly divided into two groups (n=18): group 1, without dentin surface treatment, and group 2, with dentin surface treated with 10% polyacrylic acid for 15 seconds. In both groups the primer was applied before the application of the nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Ketac N100) and light-cured for 20 seconds. After 24 hours, the specimens were submitted to thermocycling for 350 cycles, and the teeth were immersed in distilled water at room temperature. After 24 hours, specimens were tested for shear bond strength at 1mm/minute crosshead speed. The collected data were analyzed using the non-parametric test of Mann Whitney (p<0.05). Results: There was a significant difference in shear bond strength values between the treatment and control groups, the group with dentin conditioning with 10% polyacrylic acid showed higher shear strength values than the group without dentin treatment. Conclusion: Application of 10% polyacrylic acid on dentin increases the shear bond strength values of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
4
Zivojinovic, Vesna, and Dejan Markovic. "Clinical efficiency evaluation of minimal dental restorations on occlusal teeth surfaces." Serbian Dental Journal 51, no. 1 (2004): 13–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sgs0401013z.
Full textAbstract:
Minimal dental restoration of occlusal surfaces using sealing for prevention, preserve sound tooth structure. The aim of this study was to clinicaly assess the performance of three different techniques in minimal dental restoration. A total of 90 teeth (premolars or molars) with minimal carious lesions were equally divided into three groups and included in this study. In group I and II teeth were restored either with the composite resin and the resin modified glass ionomer cement. Composite sealant (separately applied) was used in both groups. In group III teeth received resin modified glass ionomer cement. These materials were used at the same time as a restorative and a sealant. Modified Cvar and Ryge criteria were used for clinical evaluation after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months. Complete retention at the end of the evaluation period for I, II and III group was 97%, 93% and 93% respectively. No secondary caries was recorded after the evaluation period. From the obtained results it can be concluded that minimal dental restorations presents an efficient and successful technique in the treatment of small occlusal carious lesions.
5
Rolim, FG, AF Sá, GWL Silva-Filho, A. de S. Brandim, and GC Vale. "Effect of High-Fluoride Dentifrice on Enamel Erosion Adjacent to Restorations In Vitro." Operative Dentistry 41, no. 2 (March 1, 2016): 157–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/14-292-l.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Aim: This in vitro study analyzed the antierosive potential of a high-fluoride dentifrice on enamel adjacent to restorations. Methods and Materials: Enamel blocks (6 × 6 × 3 mm) from bovine incisor teeth were restored with three different restorative materials (resin, conventional glass ionomer cement, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement) and treated with dentifrices containing 0, 1100, or 5000 ppm F. After restorative procedures, initial surface Vickers hardness of the blocks were obtained. The specimens were submitted to pH cycles (4 × 90 seconds in soft drink) and treatments for five days. Between the challenges and overnight, the blocks remained in artificial saliva. At the end of the experiment, the final hardness was assessed and the percentage of surface mineral loss (%SML) was calculated. A 3 × 3 factorial design was used to conduct statistical analysis. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and t-test, with significance level fixed at 5%. Results: High-fluoride dentifrice decreased demineralization caused by erosive challenge regardless of the restorative material used (p<0.001). Likewise, the blocks restored with conventional glass ionomer cement showed lower values of SML irrespective of dentifrice used (p<0.001). Conclusion: Use of a high-fluoride dentifrice on teeth restored with conventional glass ionomer cement offers additional protection against enamel erosion.
6
Beriat, Nilufer Celebi, and Dilek Nalbant. "Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers." European Journal of Dentistry 03, no. 04 (October 2009): 267–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697443.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACTObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the water absorption and the amount of hydroxyethyl metacrylate (HEMA) level released from various resin modified glass ionomer cements.Methods: Advance, Vitremer and Protec-Cem resin modified glass ionomer cements were used to evaluate the HEMA release. Ten specimens were fabricated from each cement in 10 × 1 mm height. Thirty specimens were immersed in glass containers filled with 20 ml deionized water. 1 ml solution was taken from the container at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 24 hour and 7 days intervals from each group and analyzed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) machine and the results are presented in ppm. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests at a 0.05 significance level.Results: At all time intervals Vitremer showed highest HEMA release (10 min: 54.2 ppm; 1 h: 86.8 ppm; 24 h: 93.4 ppm) (P=0.0001). At the end of 10 minutes and first hour, following Vitremer, HEMA release was highest for Protec-Cem (10 min: 14.8 ppm; 1 h: 23.6 ppm) and then Advance (10 min: 5.5 ppm; 1 h: 18.8 ppm) (P<.05). Water absorption tests were performed according to the specifications of ISO 4049. Water absorption was highest for Vitremer and lowest for the Protec-Cem and the difference among cement groups was significant (P<.005).Conclusions: Vitremer showed the highest HEMA release and water absorption values and Protec-Cem showed the lowest values. HEMA release by time was significant for Advance cement. This release may be relevant both to the risk of adverse pulpal responses in patients and to the risk of allergy in patients and dental personnel. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:267-272)
7
Markovic, Dejan, Bojan Petrovic, Tamara Peric, and Duska Blagojevic. "Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants." Vojnosanitetski pregled 69, no. 4 (2012): 320–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/vsp1204320m.
Full textAbstract:
Background/Aim. Retention of fissure sealants and good adaptation to enamel are essential for their success. Fluoride releasing resin-based materials are widely accepted for pit and fissure sealing, but newly designed glass ionomers can serve as a good alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage and sealing ability in vitro, and to clinically assess two fluoride releasing fissure sealants. Methods. The sample for experimental study consisted of 20 freshly extracted intact human third molars, divided in two experimental groups according to the sealing material: fluoride releasing resin-based (Heliosel F) and glass ionomer (Fuji Triage) material. Digital images and scanning electron microscope were used to assess microleakage and adaptation ability. Sample for clinical study consisted of 60 children, aged 6-8 years, with high caries risk, divided in two groups according to the sealant material. Fissure sealant was applied to all erupted, caries-free first permanent molars. Sealants were evaluated after 3, 6 and 12 months using modified Ryge criteria for retention, marginal adaptation, colour match, surface smoothness and caries. Results. Microleakage was detected in more than half of the specimen, without significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). Both materials exhibited acceptable sealing ability. Complete retention at the end of the observation period was 81.8% for resin-based, and 21.1% for glass-ionomer fissure sealant (p < 0.001). The presence of caries in sealed molars has been detected in one patient in both groups. During the 12-month observation period, Helioseal F demonstrated better retention, marginal adaptation and surface smoothness (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two materials regarding caries and color match (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Both tested materials demonstrate satisfactory clinical and caries prophylactic characteristics that justify their use in contemporary preventive dentistry.
8
Popescu, Sanda Mihaela, Mihaela Jana Ţuculină, Horia Octavian Manolea, Veronica Mercuţ, and Monica Scrieciu. "Randomized Clinical Trial of Adhesive Restorations in Non Carious Cervical Lesions." Key Engineering Materials 695 (May 2016): 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.695.3.
Full textAbstract:
AIM: To evaluate the clinical performance of adhesive restorations of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC) compared with of resin composite (RC), and RMGIC liner base laminated with a resin composite in non carious cervical lesions (NCCL).METHODS: The randomized clinical trial included 45 patients (25-65 year-old), with at least two similar sized NCCL on premolars. After sample size calculation, 220 restorations were placed, according to one of the following groups: (G1) Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer); (G2) a resin composite and an adhesive layer (Versaflo); (G3) RMGIC liner base laminated with a resin composite (Vitremer and Versaflo). The restorations were clinically followed every 6 months for up to 24 months using the USPHS modified criteria for clinical evaluation. Survival estimates for restoration longevity were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test (P< 0.05) was used to compare the differences in the success rate according to the type of the restorative material.RESULTS: At the end of 24 months, 172 restorations were evaluated in 37 patients, with a recall rate of 82.22%. The type of restorative material used did not influence the longevity of the restorations. The survival rates for the follow-up were similar regarding the number of restored surfaces and the tooth (upper or lower premolar). Estimated survival rates of the restorations were 100%, 100%, 98,25% and 90,69% at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of clinical evaluations, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between RMGIC and RC or RMGIC laminated with RC for color match, but no other significant difference was observed among the three types of restorations.CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates were similar for the three types of restorations in NCCL. Different types of materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance in non-carious cervical lesions.
9
Koc Vural, U., S. Gökalp, and A. Kiremitci. "Clinical Performance of Composite Restorations with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Lining in Root Surface Carious Lesions." Operative Dentistry 41, no. 3 (May 1, 2016): 268–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/15-205-c.
Full textAbstract:
SUMMARY Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of composite restorations in root surface carious lesions with or without resin-modified glass ionomer lining. Methods and Materials: The sample consisted of 25 female and 14 male patients. A maximum of four lesions were included for each patient. After caries removal, the depth, length, and width of the cavity were measured. Lesions in the same patient were randomly divided into two groups, and the dentin surfaces were either lined with resin-modified glass ionomer liner (Glass Liner II) or left as they were. Self-etch adhesive (All Bond SE) was applied and cured for 20 seconds. All cavities were restored with nanohybrid anterior composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic). Two experienced clinicians evaluated the marginal adaptation (retention) rate, anatomic form, secondary caries, sensitivity, and marginal staining of restorations at the end of the first week and at six, 12, and 18 months posttreatment. The data were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square and two-way repeated measures tests. Results: At the end of 18 months, a total of five lined and three unlined restorations were lost. There was no significant relationship between marginal adaptation and cavity lining at six, 12, and 18 months (p>0.05). Although marginal stainings of restorations were mostly localized, the total number of localized or generalized discolored restorations increased with time (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant relationship between marginal staining and smoking (p>0.05). There was no significant relationship between marginal staining and frequency of toothbrushing at six, 12, and 18 months (p=0.286, p=0.098, and p=0.408, respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, both restorative applications were accepted as clinically appropriate.
10
Prabhaker, A. R., O. S. Raju, Ameet J. Kurthukoti, and V. Satish. "Evaluation of the Clinical Behavior of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Molars: A Comparative One-year Study." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 9, no. 2 (2008): 130–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-9-2-130.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Aim The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) on primary molars with conventional and modified cavity preparations. Methods and Materials Forty-two children, 5-9 years of age, having bilateral initial occlusal caries on the mandibular primary second molars were selected for the study. A split mouth design was employed where conventional Class I cavities with a 90° cavosurface angle were prepared randomly on primary second molars on one side and modified cavities with a 1 mm straight bevel along the cavosurface margin on the contra-lateral side. These cavities were restored with RMGIC. The restorations were evaluated during subsequent visits, for a period of one year. Results At the end of one year, 90% of the restorations survived in the conventional cavity group whereas 100% of the restorations survived in the modified cavity group. Conclusion Incorporation of a bevel in Class I cavities increases the survival rate of RMGIC restorations. There was no significant difference in the clinical behavior between the two groups. However, beveling does contribute to long term clinical success of these restorations. Clinical Significance Incorporation of a straight bevel in conventional cavities will improve the retention of RMGIC by increasing the bonding area and enhancing the desired properties of the material. Citation Prabhakar AR, Raju OS, Kurthukoti AJ, Satish V. Evaluation of the Clinical Behavior of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Molars: A Comparative One-year Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 February;(9)2:130-137.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer. eng"
1
Oliveira, Luana Cristina Araújo de. "Análise das tensões geradas durante a contração de polimerização e aplicação de cargas em restaurações diretas de resina composta. Efeito da utilização de materiais para base ou forramento /." Araraquara : [s.n.], 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/101374.
Full textAbstract:
Resumo: O objetivo desta investigação científica foi analisar o efeito da presença de materiais para base ou forramento, nas tensões geradas durante a contração de polimerização e aplicação de cargas, em cavidade classe I, no segundo pré-molar superior. Foram avaliadas quatro técnicas restauradoras: 1) Resina composta Z250(3M ESPE) controle, 2) Resina composta Z250(3M ESPE) + forramento com resina de baixa viscosidade FiltekFlow(3M ESPE), 3) Resina composta Z250(3M ESPE) + Forramento com ionômero de vidro modificado por resina Vitrebond(3M ESPE) e 4) Resina composta Z250(3M ESPE) + base com ionômero de vidro modificado por resina Vitrebond(3M ESPE). O estudo transcorreu em três fases: 1)Fotoelasticidade, 2)Tensilometria e 3)Elementos Finitos. 1ª Fase (Fotoelasticidade) - Nesta etapa foram avaliadas as tensões geradas durante a contração de polimerização na cavidade confeccionada em modelo fotoelástico, restaurada com as técnicas descritas acima, nomeadas F1, F2, F3 e F4 respectivamente e determinada a Tensão Cisalhante Máxima(tmáx ) na interface adesiva e realizados os Testes ANOVA e Tukey (p=0,05). 2ª Fase (Tensilometria) - Nesta etapa foram avaliadas as tensões geradas durante a contração de polimerização de cada material, assim agrupados: T1 - resina composta, T2 - resina de baixa viscosidade e T3 - Ionômero de vidro modificado por resina, os quais foram inseridos entre duas bases cilíndricas de dentina bovina (diâmetro 4,0 mm) com espessura de 2,0mm, sendo que a base superior foi conectada a uma célula de carga. Os valores de força foram registrados iniciando simultaneamente com a fotopolimerização até a completa estabilização das forças... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo)Abstract: The aim of this study was analyze the effect of liner and base materials presence during polymerization shrinkage and load application, on cavities class I, in maxillary premolar. The following technique were assigned: 1) Composite resin Z250(3M ESPE)-control, 2) Composite resin Z250(3M ESPE) + liner with flowable FiltekFlow (3M ESPE) 3) Composite resin Z250(3M ESPE) + liner with resin-modified glass-ionomer Vitrebond(3M ESPE) e 4) Composite resin Z250(3M ESPE) + base with resin-modified glass-ionomer Vitrebond(3M ESPE). The study was divided in three phases: 1) Photoelasticity, 2) Tensilometry e 3) Finite Elements Analysis. 1ª (Photoelasticity) - In this phase was determinate polymerization shrinkage stress in photoelastic model, filled with techniques, named F1, F2, F3 e F4 respectively and Maximal Shear Stress (tmáx) was determinate along adhesive interface. Results were analyzes by Anova and Tukey Test. (p=0,05). 2ª (Tensilometry) - In this phase was determinate, polymerization shrinkage stress, for each material: T1 - composite resin, T2 - flowable resin e T3 - resin-modified glass-ionomer. Materials were inserted into 2mm space, between two dentin bovine cylindrical bases, (diameter 4,0mm), which one was connected a load cell. A curve ForceXTime, was obtained for each of samples. Results were analyzes by Anova and Tukey Test. (p=0,05). 3ª (Finite Elements Analysis) - In this phase, stresses resulting from polymerization shrinkage in combination with oclusal loading, were determinate in a 2D finite element model. The polymerization shrinkage stress was fundamented in Tensilometry and Phoelasticity results... (Complete abstract, click electronic access below)
Orientador: Sillas Luiz Lordelo Duarte Júnior
Coorientador: Welingtom Dinelli
Banca: José Roberto Cury Saad
Banca: Osmir Batista de Oliveira Júnior
Banca: Cleudmar Amaral de Araújo
Banca: Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli
Doutor
2
Peliz, Fernandes Maria Inez Lemos. "Avaliação da interface dentina/agentes protetores em restaurações com resina composta, através de microscopia eletrônica de varredura /." Araraquara : [s.n.], 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/101401.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Sillas Luiz Lordelo Duarte JúniorBanca: Welingtom Dinelli
Banca: Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade
Banca: José Roberto Cury Saad
Banca: Manio de Carvalho Tibúrcio
Banca: Camilo Anauate Netto
Resumo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a formação de microfendas entre diferentes agentes de proteção do complexo dentina-polpa e a estrutura dental. Cavidades de classe V, com dimensões padronizadas, foram preparadas nas faces V e L de 60 terceiros molares humanos recém-extraídos, divididos em 6 grupos: (1) Single Bond-SB, 3M ESPE; (2) Life-LF, Kerr Co.+ SB; (3) LF+Vitrebond-VT, 3M ESPE +SB; (4) VT+SB; (5) SB+VT; (6) SB+VT+SB; e restauradas com resina composta microhíbrida Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE), segundo as normas estabelecidas pelos fabricantes, exceto para os grupos 5 e 6 onde a dentina foi hibridizada previamente à aplicação do ionômero de vidro modificado por resina. Após ciclagem térmica, um segmento longitudinal de 800 æm de espessura foi obtido da porção central de cada restauração e, em seguida, submetidos às etapas de fixação, desidratação em grau ascendente de etanol e secagem através de HMDS. A adaptação interna dos materiais à parede axial foi analisada através do MEV, com 1000x de magnificação. Os dados obtidos foram analisados através do procedimento estatístico não-paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05). O cimento de hidróxido de cálcio e ionômero de vidro modificado por resina aplicados sozinhos ou em conjunto (p<0.001), sob restauração de resina composta, resultou em microfendas com amplitude estatisticamente maiores do que quando a dentina foi somente hibridizada previamente a restauração. A hibridização dentinária permitiu selamento superior da interface dentina/restauração do que os demais agentes protetores avaliados.
Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the microgap with different materials used for pulp protection. The null hypothesis tested in this in vitro study was that the combination among calcium hydroxide, resin-modified glass ionomer and dentin adhesive, used as pulp protection in composite restorations would not result in greater axial gap than that obtained by hybridization only. Standardized class V preparations were performed in buccal and lingual surfaces of sixty caries-free extracted human third molars. The prepared teeth were randomly assessed in 6 groups: (1) Single Bond-SB, 3M ESPE; (2) Life-LF, Kerr Co.+ SB; (3) LF+Vitrebond-VT, 3M ESPE +SB; (4) VT+SB; (5) SB+VT; (6) SB+VT+SB; and restored with a microhybrid composite resin Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE), following the manufacturer's instructions. Except for group 5 and 6, which the ethanol- and water-based adhesive were applied prior the resin-modified glass ionomer. The specimens were then cross-sectioned with a thickness of 800 æm, fixed, dehydrated in ascending ethanol, and dried by means HMDS. The specimens were mounted in stubs, sputter coated and the internal adaptation of the materials to the axial wall analyzed under SEM with 1,000x magnification. The data obtained were analyzed with nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.05). The null hypothesis was rejected. Calcium hydroxide and resin-modified glass ionomer applied alone or in conjunction (p<0.001), under composite resin restoration, resulted in statistically wider micro gaps than when the dentin was only hybridized prior the restoration. Dentin hybridization provides superior sealing of the dentin and restoration interface than other pulp protection materials.
Doutor
3
Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur. "Resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials : an evaluation involving microscopy." Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.362847.
Full text
4
Rix, Douglas. "Bond strengths and fluoride release of modified glass ionomer and resin adhesives." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ39873.pdf.
Full text
5
Ro, Emily Y. "Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Two Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cements." VCU Scholars Compass, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10156/1759.
Full text
6
Karjiker, Farzana. "The colour stability of various glass ionomer cements." University of the Western Cape, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/7023.
Full textAbstract:
>Magister Scientiae - MScIntroduction: Together with bonding to both enamel and dentine, an ideal restorative material would display physical properties similar to that of natural tooth tissue and would not be prone to degradation as a result of the oral environment. This includes changes in colour. Glass ionomer technology has undergone many changes to its original chemistry since it was developed in the early 1970’s. In 1988 resin-modified glass ionomers were introduced and in 2008, nano-ionomers were introduced. As a result of the progression in material sciences and the use of more sophisticated techniques and methods in restorative dentistry, it is possible to accomplish much improved aesthetics and functional durability of a restoration, both anteriorly and posteriorly. However, for as long as aesthetic restorations have been available, and in spite of advances in material structure and performance, one of the greatest challenges facing clinicians still remains that aesthetic restorations have to be replaced relatively frequently as staining and discolouration is a common problem. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to determine the stainability of four resin-modified glass ionomers and one glass ionomer cement when exposed to a staining broth. Objectives: To record any change in colour before and after exposing the sample with the staining broth using a spectrophotometer, to compare the stainability, to examine the depth of staining using a light microscope and to observe the particle size of the powder and the surface texture using Scanning Electron Microscopy of the four resin- modified glass ionomer cements and one glass ionomer cement. Materials and Methods: Four resin-modified glass ionomers (one nano-ionomer) and one glass ionomer (zinc-reinforced ionomer) were selected. All were shade A2, except for Vitremer™ which was not available in A2. 15 discs of each material were prepared. The discs were 15 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness. All the materials were handled and cured according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After curing, only one side of each disc was polished using Sof-Lex™ discs (3M ESPE, USA). The unpolished side of each disc was designated as a matrix finish. The specimens were all immersed in distilled water at 37 °C for one week. They were then immersed in a staining broth for a period of one week and readings were taken after a period of 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours and one week. Colour was read on each side of each disc at the indicated intervals with a spectrophotometer. The colour difference was calculated using the CIELAB colour co-ordinates. Sample discs were then sectioned to determine the depth of staining. An additional sample disc of each material was made for observation with the SEM and was therefore not stained. Also, an unmixed sample of each material was prepared for examination with the SEM. Results: In general, for all materials there was an increase in staining when assessed with the colour difference between the baseline colour and the 7 day reading. Ketac™ N100, showed the highest total colour change of 43.84 for the unpolished surface followed by Riva™ which showed the total colour change of 28.55 for the unpolished surface. This was similar to Fuji II LC® which had a total colour change of 28.16 for the unpolished surface. For Vitremer™, the total colour change increased to 18.07 for the unpolished surface. For the unpolished surfaces, ChemFil™ Rock showed the least colour difference from baseline to 7 days (ΔE*ab = 10.45), followed by Vitremer™ (ΔE*ab = 18.07). Both Fuji II LC® and Riva™ Light Cure showed similar colour change from baseline to 7 days for unpolished surfaces (ΔE*ab of 28.16 and 28.55 respectively). Ketac™ N100 showed the highest staining after 7 days in the staining broth with a colour difference of 43.84. For the polished surfaces, the colour change for Fuji II LC® was 25.72 which was similar to Riva™ Light Cure which was 22.44 and Ketac™ N100 which showed a colour change of 22.79 on the polished surface. ChemFil™ Rock showed the least colour change of 17.69 for the polished surface followed by Vitremer™ which showed a colour change of 23.63 for the polished surface. Thus, for both the unpolished and polished surfaces there was a similar staining pattern. Conclusion: In this study it was demonstrated that all products evaluated in this study showed some degree of staining when exposed to a staining broth when evaluated using the ΔE*ab CIELAB colour evaluation. Ketac™ N100 showed the highest colour change compared to the other materials, but the reason for this was not explored. Both Vitremer™ and ChemFil™ Rock showed similar patterns of staining.
2020-09-01
7
Torabzadeh, Hassan. "Laboratory and clinical investigations into resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and related materials." Thesis, University of Bristol, 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.337636.
Full text
8
Summers, Andrew. "Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive an in vitro and in vivo study /." Morgantown, W. Va. : [West Virginia University Libraries], 2002. http://etd.wvu.edu/templates/showETD.cfm?recnum=2336.
Full textAbstract:
Thesis (M.S.)--West Virginia University, 2002.Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 101 p. : ill. (some col.). Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 57-63).
9
Luo, Yan, and 羅琰. "Assessment of a glass polyalkenoate cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite for the restoration of posterior teeth." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2000. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31242121.
Full text
10
Luo, Yan. "Assessment of a glass polyalkenoate cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite for the restoration of posterior teeth." Hong Kong : University of Hong Kong, 2000. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record.jsp?B22242879.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer. eng"
1
Nicholson, John, and Beata Czarnecka. "Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements." In Materials for the Direct Restoration of Teeth, 137–59. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100491-3.00007-6.
Full text
2
Rahiotis, C., and S. Schricker. "Bonding with glass ionomer cements and resin-modified glass ionomer cements." In Orthodontic Applications of Biomaterials, 253–65. Elsevier, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100383-1.00016-3.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Resin-modified glass ionomer. eng"
1
Aryo Nugroho, Teguh, Sondang Pintauli, and Amalia Oeripto. "Anti-Caries Effect of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements as Orthodontic Adhesive Material through Scanning Electron Microscope Examination (In Vitro)." In International Dental Conference of Sumatera Utara 2017 (IDCSU 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/idcsu-17.2018.75.
Full text
2
Yudhit, Astrid, Kholidina Harahap, and Sabrina Chairunnisa Nasution. "Effect of Hydroxyapatite From Nile Tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus) Scale on Surface Hardness of Conventional and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (In Vitro Study)." In 1st Aceh International Dental Meeting (AIDEM 2019), Oral Health International Conference On Art, Nature And Material Science Development 2019. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210201.002.
Full text