Relevant bibliographies by topics / Responsible research and innovation

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Responsible research and innovation'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Responsible research and innovation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Responsible research and innovation"

1

de Saille, Stevienna. "Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’." Journal of Responsible Innovation 2, no. 2 (May 4, 2015): 152–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jakobsen, Stig-Erik, Arnt Fløysand, and John Overton. "Expanding the field of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) – from responsible research to responsible innovation." European Planning Studies 27, no. 12 (September 19, 2019): 2329–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1667617.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sudolska, Lis, and Chodorek. "Research Profiling for Responsible and Sustainable Innovations." Sustainability 11, no. 23 (November 20, 2019): 6553. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236553.

Full text
Abstract:
The issues of responsible and sustainable innovations have been attracting the growing attention of the ranks of scholars in recent years. However, this amassing productivity in the field has not been mapped and profiled thoroughly, yet. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to map the research output related to the concepts of responsible and sustainable innovations with the method of research profiling. The analysis consists of three components: general research profiling, subject area profiling and topic profiling conducted with the use of Scopus database. The research process is directed at answering three research questions: (1) who are the main contributors within the scholarly community? why? so what? (2) how is the research output distributed among subject areas? why? so what? (3) what are the central topics and issues discussed within the research field? why? so what? First of all, key contributing countries, research institutions, journals, and authors are identified in order to characterize the scholarly community working in the field. Secondly, research output is profiled through the prism of respective subject areas. This type of profiling aims at discovering varieties among key journals, authors and core references distributed across various subject areas. Thirdly, topic analysis is conducted in order to point out most crucial aspects studied in the body of literature in the field. The research sample consists of 1,083 publications indexed in Scopus database, including the phrases ‘responsible innovation’ or ‘sustainable innovation’ within their titles, keywords, and abstracts (topic search). The findings from the general research profiling confirm the growing interest of academia in exploring and investigating the issues of responsible and sustainable innovations. The leading contributors in the field are scholars and research institutions from the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Dutch universities and research centers occupy three top three positions in regard to the number of publications. Among them, Delft University of Technology is the unquestionable leader. Journal of Cleaner Production and Journal of Responsible Innovation are found to be the most prolific and highly recognized source titles in the field. Subject area profiling shows a relatively high level of interrelatedness among the four leading subject areas i.e., Business, Management and Accounting, Engineering, Social Sciences, and Environmental Science in regard to authors, source titles and core references. Topic profiling indicates two leading thematic streams in the research field focused on the features and core aspects of responsible and sustainable innovations, and the relationships of the concept with people (human, humans), research, ethics, and technology. Discussion of research findings is focused around comparing and contrasting three overlapping concepts (i.e., responsible research and innovation, responsible innovation, and sustainable innovation), providing the critical assessment of the reasons for the scholarly research to have developed along with certain patterns and identifying unexplored aspects or possible future avenues of research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Turk, Žiga. "Responsible Research and Innovation in Construction." Procedia Engineering 164 (2016): 461–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.645.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tait, Joyce. "From responsible research to responsible innovation: challenges in implementation." Engineering Biology 1, no. 1 (May 18, 2017): 7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/enb.2017.0010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Flipse, S. M., K. H. Van Dam, J. Stragier, T. J. C. Oude Vrielink, and M. C. A. Van der Sanden. "Operationalizing responsible research & innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice." Journal on Chain and Network Science 15, no. 2 (December 7, 2015): 135–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/jcns2015.x004.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper presents a tool that can help innovators to operationalize responsible research & innovation (RRI) in industry and offers decision support in their innovation project management. This tool is based on an earlier method of project quality assessment to identify innovative project success-related key performance indicators (KPIs). Based on real-world data and using structural equation modelling, a model is developed that relates the KPIs to one another and provides innovators with the opportunity to compare quality scores of current projects to a database of earlier successful and less successful project quality assessments. Building on this model, using a rapid prototyping approach based simulation and modelling, a scenario development tool has been developed that can predict success chances of current projects based on changing KPI score parameters. By highlighting the value of the KPIs in relation to RRI, and by elucidating what could be done to increase values of low scoring project KPIs, innovators who use the tool can evaluate possible actions they can deploy to increase the quality of their innovative projects, while simultaneously innovating in a more socially responsible way.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bolz, Karsten, and Anne de Bruin. "Responsible innovation and social innovation: toward an integrative research framework." International Journal of Social Economics 46, no. 6 (June 10, 2019): 742–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijse-10-2018-0517.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeResponsible innovation (RI) and social innovation (SI) are two fields of innovation study experiencing burgeoning policy, practice and research interest. Despite this rapid rise in popularity, the scholarly literature in these two related areas of innovation study remains quite separate, stymieing the growth of shared research insights. The purpose of this paper is to propose a pragmatic, process-based framework that lends itself to advancing systematic research in both fields while retaining their distinct identities.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual paper outlines an analogy-inspired framework that builds on the logical thinking put forward by Philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine in 1962. It focusses on key processes that cross-cut both fields.FindingsReflexivity, collaboration and design are identified as three broad core processes that span both the RI and SI fields and form the basis of an integrative framework that highlights the scope for cross-field research pollination.Originality/valueThe literature that draws these two fields together is virtually non-existent. The paper uses analogy to facilitate awareness of the parallels between these two areas of innovation study. The integrative framework put forward in the paper is of value for advancing cumulative research in innovation fields of critical importance to the society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Stahl, Bernd Carsten. "Responsible research and innovation in information systems." European Journal of Information Systems 21, no. 3 (May 2012): 207–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Yaghmaei, Emad. "Addressing responsible research and innovation to industry." ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 45, no. 3 (January 5, 2016): 294–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874282.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wiwanitkit, Somsri, and Viroj Wiwanitkit. "“Broader Impacts” or “Responsible Research and Innovation”?" Science and Engineering Ethics 20, no. 4 (December 7, 2013): 1149–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9501-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Responsible research and innovation"

1

Timmermans, Job Franciscus Catharina. "Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in research projects." Thesis, De Montfort University, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/2086/14280.

Full text
Abstract:
Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) aims to achieve societally desirable outcomes and marketable products of innovative processes. In recent years RRI has become a key factor in national and international Research and Innovation (R&I) policy and funding. As a consequence, actors involved in R&I are required to implement it. However, while on a conceptual and theoretical level RRI has been discussed in depth, on a practical and empirical level it remains largely underdeveloped. To contribute to the bridging of this gap between policy/theory and practice, this research assesses how RRI can be conceptualised and implemented in research projects in a way that allows it to reach its objectives. To attain an in-depth understanding of the implementation of RRI, a qualitative research strategy is deployed using a case study approach. As cases, three research projects are selected from the Netherlands Responsible Innovation (MVI) programme, which is the first programme to fund dedicated RRI projects. Analysis within and across the cases is supported by an analytical model based on a relational conceptualisation of responsibility. The model enables describing and analysing how the overarching aims and requirements of RRI translate into responsibilities taken and ascribed by R&I actors involved in projects. Building on an in-depth review of eight accounts of RRI and deploying the analytical model, this research provides a better understanding of the relationships between RRI and the targeted R&I, RRI and further instances of RRI beyond it, and RRI and its academic context. Furthermore, it identifies a number of key components that affect the outcomes of RRI, namely: the status of researchers implementing RRI as societal stakeholders, the role of interdisciplinary collaboration as a strategic means to defend (societal) interests, and the role of authorities such as funders in incentivising and sanctioning RRI. Lastly, the research reflects novel barriers and enablers that are relevant to implementing RRI. On the one hand, meeting the aims of RRI may be problematic due to academic and societal aims of researchers being in tension with each other, and to the manner, researchers defend their societal interests, which also may negatively influence the implementation of RRI. On the other hand, consideration of the R&I stage in projecting an impact and involving R&I actors, as well as making RRI rewarding to researchers throughout academic careers enables effective implementation of RRI. Based on the insights gained, recommendations are made for policymakers, funding bodies and researchers concerning the current lack of alignment between societal and academic interests when implementing RRI, capacitating and motivating actors to implement RRI, and ensuring alignment of RRI activities over time.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Martinuzzi, Robert-Andre, Vincent Blok, Alexander Brem, Bernd Stahl, and Norma Schönherr. "Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry-Challenges, Insights and Perspectives." MDPI AG, 2018. http://epub.wu.ac.at/6119/1/sustainability%2D10%2D00702.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
The responsibility of industry towards society and the environment is a much discussed topic, both in academia and in business. Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has recently emerged as a new concept with the potential to advance this discourse in light of two major challenges industry is facing today. The first relates to the accelerating race to innovate in order to stay competitive in a rapidly changing world. The second concerns the need to maintain public trust in industry through innovations that generate social value in addition to economic returns. This Special Issue provides empirical and conceptual contributions that explore corporate motivations to adopt RRI, the state of implementation of concrete RRI practices, the role of stakeholders in responsible innovation processes, as well as drivers and barriers to the further diffusion of RRI in industry. Overall, these contributions highlight the relevance of RRI for firms of different sizes and sectors. They also provide insights and suggestions for managers, policymakers and researchers wishing to engage with responsibility in innovation. This editorial summarizes the most pertinent conclusions across the individual articles published in this Special Issue and concludes by outlining some fruitful avenues for future research in this space.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bengtsson, Lars, Barbara Ribeiro, Paul Benneworth, Susanne Bührer, Elena Castro-Martínez, Meiken Hansen, Katharina Jarmai, et al. "Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation." Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. http://epub.wu.ac.at/6472/1/23299460.2018.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
In this discussion paper, we outline and reflect on some of the key challenges that influence the development and uptake of more inclusive and responsible forms of research and innovation. Taking these challenges together, we invoke Collingridge's famous dilemma of social control of technology to introduce a complementary dilemma that of "societal alignment" in the governance of science, technology and innovation. Considerations of social alignment are scattered and overlooked among some communities in the field of science, technology and innovation policy. By starting to unpack this dilemma, we outline an agenda for further consideration of social alignment in the study of responsible research and innovation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Carbajo, Garcia Ruth. "Responsible Research and Innovation applied to Renewable Energy Research. A theoretical contextualization and implementation proposals." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Lleida, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/669232.

Full text
Abstract:
La consideració de que els resultats de la innovació i recerques científiques poden entendre's com l'expressió dels valors humans de seguretat, justícia, sostenibilitat i eficiència ha inspirat recentment nous models de polítiques de governança. Un d'aquests models és el marc europeu Responsable Research and Inovation (RRI) que sorgeix amb l'objectiu de situar la perspectiva social en el centre de la recerca i innovació. De forma similar, els incessants reptes de transformar i governar els sistemes energètics tenint en compte els aspectes socials i tècnics s'han convertit en una prioritat en les agendes globals de recerca. En aquest sentit, els nous avanços i recerques s'enfoquen en el desenvolupament de sistemes energètics basats en renovables que siguin segurs i de confiança, així com en la transició a sistemes descentralitzats basats en la integració de capacitats soci-tècniques, de comportament i institucionals. D'aquesta manera, aquesta tesi examina la possibilitat de combinar aquestes capacitats tenint en compte l'enfocament teòric de les transicions soci–tècniques, com a proposta per a transformar la recerca en sistemes energètics. Per a això, considera situar el marc europeu RRI en el cor del concepte de transició energètica proposant una metodologia per a la seva contextualització i implementació en aquest camp. Aquest treball proposa la construcció d'un estat de l'art i marc teòric així com la seva implementació, juntament amb l'avaluació d'aquest procés a través de la proposta de casos d'estudi. El focus inicial d'aquest estudi ha estat relacionat amb l'aplicació de RRI en l'àmbit de la recerca en sistemes energètics, per al cas particular de la governança de la recerca en sistemes d'energia renovable i les seves aplicacions. La selecció d’aquest petit aspecte de la disciplina es va dur a terme amb la intenció d'explorar de forma detallada les implicacions. Malgrat el concret d'aquesta proposta, aquesta recerca avui dia ocupa un lloc preferent en l'actual i vital debat sobre la integració de la ciència i la societat. Així mateix, aprofundeix en les qüestions i reptes de com el procés creatiu de recerca i innovació serà desenvolupat en els pròxims anys; com els resultats d'aquest procés seran utilitzats, compartits i preservats i de forma més important, com aquestes idees poden vertebrar-se en marcs reguladors.
La consideración de que los resultados de la innovación pueden entenderse como la expresión de los valores humanos de seguridad, justica, sostenibilidad y eficiencia ha inspirado recientemente nuevos modelos de políticas de gobernanza. Uno de estos modelos es el marco europeo Responsable Research and Inovation (RRI)que surge con el objetivo de situar la perspectiva social en el centro de los procesos de investigación e innovación. De forma similar, los retos de transformar y gobernar los sistemas energéticos teniendo en cuenta los aspectos sociales se han convertido en una prioridad en las agendas globales de investigación. En este sentido, los nuevos avances se enfocan en el desarrollo de sistemas energéticos basados en energías renovables seguros y confiables, así como en la transición hacia sistemas descentralizados basados en la integración de capacidades socio-técnicas, de comportamiento e institucionales. Esta tesis examina la posibilidad de combinar estas capacidades teniendo en cuenta el enfoque teórico de las transiciones socio –técnicas, como propuesta para transformar la investigación en sistemas energéticos. Para ello, considera situar el marco europeo RRI en el corazón del concepto de transición energética proponiendo una metodología para su contextualización e implementación en este campo. En este sentido, este trabajo propone la construcción de un estado del arte y marco teórico, así como su implementación, junto con la evaluación de este proceso a través de la propuesta de casos de estudio. El foco inicial de este estudio ha estado relacionado con la aplicación de RRI en el ámbito de la investigación en sistemas energéticos, para el caso particular de la gobernanza de la investigación en sistemas de energía renovable y sus aplicaciones. La selección de este pequeño aspecto de la disciplina se llevó a cabo con la intención de explorar de forma detallada las implicaciones. A pesar de lo concreto de esta propuesta, esta investigación a día de hoy ocupa un lugar preferente en el actual y vital debate acerca de la integración de la ciencia y la sociedad. Asimismo, ahonda en las cuestiones y retos de cómo el proceso creativo de la innovación va a ser desarrollado en los próximos años; en cómo los resultados de este proceso van a ser utilizados, compartidos y preservados y de forma más importante, en cómo estas ideas pueden vertebrase en marcos reguladores.
The envision that outcomes of scientific research and innovation can be understood as an expression of human values, such as safety, justice, sustainability, and efficiency, recently inspired several new policy models of governance. One of them, the European Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) policy approach aims to put social perspective at the core of research and innovation. Similarly, the increasing challenge of transforming and governing energy systems taking into account social aspects became a priority in most global research agendas. New important work on research about the energy system is focusing on the development of reliable renewable energy systems, and on the transition to decentralized paths based in the integration of socio-technical, behavioural, and institutional capabilities Thereby, this thesis examines the possibility of the combination of these capabilities under the socio-technical transitions theoretical approach, as a proposal for transforming energy systems research. For this purpose, considers to putting European RRI approach at the heart of energy transitions and proposes a methodology for its contextualization and implementation on the energy research domain. In this vein, proposes the construction of a state-of-the art and theoretical framework for the RRI contextualization along with an implementation methodology, which is also assessed via case studies proposals. The initial focus of this study was on the application of RRI to the field of energy systems research, in particular to renewable energy systems and application research governance. A small area of research was chosen to be able to fully explore the implications of RRI application in the energy system governance. Despite the small size of the setting, this research is now placed at the forefront of a current and vital debate on the integration of science and society. Moreover, delves in the open questions and challenges of how the creative process of research and innovation will develop in the coming years, how will the outcomes of this process be used, shared and preserved and, most importantly, how such insights can be vertebrate into regulatory frameworks.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Baumann, Martina F., Claudia Brändle, Christopher Coenen, and Silke Zimmer-Merkle. "Taking responsibility: A responsible research and innovation (RRI) perspective on insurance issues of semi-autonomous driving." Elsevier, 2018. https://publish.fid-move.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A72226.

Full text
Abstract:
Semi-autonomous driving is an emerging – though not unprecedented – technology which cannot necessarily be seen as safe and reliably accident-free. Insurance companies thus play an important role as influential stakeholders in the negotiation and implementation processes around this new technology. They can either push the technology (e.g. by offering beneficial, promotional insurance models for semi-autonomous car owners) or constrain it (e.g. by providing restrictive insurance models or no insurance cover at all). Insurers face questions concerning ethical or societal consequences on various levels: not only when it comes to promoting the technology – whose impact is not yet certain and may range from saving to endangering lives – but also with respect to insurance models such as “pay as you drive”, which may involve discriminatory elements. The concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI) is well suited to accompanying and guiding insurers, policy makers and other stakeholders in this field through a responsible negotiation process that may prove beneficial for everyone. Part of the RRI approach is to make stakeholders aware of “soft” factors such as the ethical, societal or historical factors which influence innovation and of the need to include these aspects in their activities responsibly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Auer, Alexander, and Katharina Jarmai. "Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation Practices in SMEs: Insights into Drivers and Barriers from the Austrian Medical Device Sector." MDPI AG, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10010017.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper addresses the question of how Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) can be implemented in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). It builds on existing knowledge about RRI in business as well as on insights into motivations, drivers and barriers from the related fields of eco-innovation and sustainability innovation. Expert interviews with CEOs of SMEs in the Austrian medical device sector are analyzed to develop insights into the companies' research and innovation activities and potential drivers and barriers for RRI. The findings support the assumption that SMEs are largely unaware of the RRI concept. At the same time, however, it is possible to identify current practices that already operationalize aspects of RRI. It is argued that SMEs could build upon existing practices to further develop ways of being responsible and that implementation of RRI should be in line with specific organizational and contextual factors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bukht, Rumana. "Responsibility, regulation and the construction of markets of nanotechnologies in food and food packaging : the cases of Canada and India." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2016. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/responsibility-regulation-and-the-construction-of-markets-of-nanotechnologies-in-food-and-food-packaging-the-cases-of-canada-and-india(3624dd5f-e9fe-45f8-9225-73de26411bb5).html.

Full text
Abstract:
Scientific research, technological development, and commercialisation are processes through which new technologies continually emerge and enter markets. Nanotechnology is an example of an emergent technology (or rather a suite of technologies) which promises to open up a universe of possibilities for the development of new products and processes. Advocates of the technology argue that nanotechnology has the potential to spur economic development while at the same time offering partial solutions to many of the grand challenges of our times such as alleviating hunger, providing new energy sources, reducing climate change, curing diseases, etc. However, alongside these optimistic views, there are also fears and apprehensions concerning the safe and ethical development of nanotechnologies, including the need to address potential negative impacts on the natural environment and human health and safety. The food and food packaging area has shown itself to be a particularly sensitive sector in this respect where the potential for nanoparticles to enter the human body has enhanced the sensitivity of the industry to public concern. The past has shown that any changes or modifications made to food have resulted in public backlash (e.g. GM foods). Due to this some parts of the food and packaging industry remain cautious about making transparent their use of nanotechnologies in their products and processes. However, simultaneously pressure is mounting from regulatory agencies, and from some activists, to pursue the safe and 'responsible' development of nanotechnologies (whatever that may be) as an ethical obligation. The use of nanotechnologies in food and food packaging has become increasingly complex because of its introduction at various points in the food chain, giving rise to debates as to "who is responsible". As a contribution to the debate on what constitutes the 'responsible' governance of new/emergent technologies, this thesis investigates the governance of nanotechnologies and the idea of 'responsibility' and 'responsible innovation' through the lens of perspectives of different actors within the nanotech food chain. A qualitative research methodology was used where semi-structured interviews were conducted with a heterogeneous group of actors with a particular focus on the food and food packaging sectors. Research in comparative national settings (Canada and India) was conducted on the grounds that regulation of nanotechnologies differs significantly across OECD and non-OECD countries, and where the global debate on nanotechnologies is organised and dominated by OECD countries. Findings from this thesis showed that the set of critical elements, such as health and safety, that are put forward by such OECD countries like Canada for the 'responsible' development of nanotechnologies are not the same as that found in India and are seen to differ. In India, meeting the grand challenges of society such as food security, clean drinking water and alleviating poverty take precedent over other elements, where science, technology (such as nanotechnologies) and innovation are harnessed by entrepreneurs, and small and large firms to solve these national problems. However, while I began the study with the intention of comparing two national territories with different regulatory settings, the study also found a case of collaborative Canada-India transnational research network where 'responsibility' is influenced through certain funding criteria set by the more dominant partner, Canada. This suggests the return of public intervention by dominant OECD countries in pro-actively shaping R&D processes that are influencing the 'responsible' development of nano-products in such emerging markets, where there is a potential for future trade associations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ligardo, Herrera Iván Elías. "Addressing Climate Change in Research and Innovation Projects. A Tool for Anticipatory Carbon Footprint Calculation." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165867.

Full text
Abstract:
[ES] El calentamiento global, y el cambio climático (CC) que produce, es una de las amenazas más globales y urgentes de las que es responsable la humanidad. El desafío de mitigar y adaptarse a la CC, entre otros, es una responsabilidad que ha alcanzado a todas las disciplinas, incluyendo el proceso de investigación e innovación. Durante más de 10 años, y como una forma de abordar estos grandes desafíos de nuestro tiempo, con la intención de fomentar la investigación responsable, la Comisión Europea ha estado promoviendo una temática transversal llamada: "Investigación e innovación responsable (RRI, en sus siglas en inglés)". El objetivo es sacar a la luz los problemas relacionados con la investigación y la innovación, anticipar sus consecuencias y hacer participar a la sociedad en el debate sobre la forma en que la ciencia y la tecnología pueden contribuir a crear el tipo de mundo y de sociedad que deseamos para las generaciones futuras. Esta tesis surge como un puente entre el gran desafío que representa el CC y la demanda por parte de la sociedad de investigación e innovación responsable, abordada en el contexto de la RRI. Los financiadores e impulsores de la investigación y la sociedad en su conjunto esperan que los equipos de investigación e innovación proporcionen resultados socialmente deseables, éticamente aceptables y sostenibles. Por lo tanto, la pregunta general que se responde en esta tesis es: ¿cómo sabe un equipo de investigación, sin ser especialista en evaluación ambiental, si su investigación es responsable de emisiones contribuyentes al cambio climático, y cómo puede incluir medidas para reducir o compensar esas emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI)? Para responder a esta pregunta, la presente tesis doctoral inicia con la descripción de los principales fundamentos que son centrales en ella: CC y RRI. En lo que respecta al primer concepto, explicamos la importancia y los medios para calcular la contribución al CC, principalmente el enfoque de la Huella de Carbono. En lo que respecta al segundo concepto, se explica la alineación de esta tesis el área clave de la sostenibilidad ambiental de la RRI, sus marcos sustantivos y sus dimensiones de anticipación y reflexividad. Una vez establecidos estos dos fundamentos, el cambio climático se aborda en el contexto de la RRI, revisando la literatura sobre los proyectos y propuestas de la RRI, incluyendo la sostenibilidad ambiental, y el CC en particular. Como resultado, surgieron dos avenidas de investigación, que se desarrollan en las siguientes secciones. Una avenida sobre cómo evaluar la influencia de las partes interesadas en un proyecto de investigación en el contexto de la RRI, desarrollada en el capítulo 3, y una avenida sobre la necesidad de nuevas herramientas basadas en bases de datos de acceso abierto para ayudar a los profesionales a integrar la prevención del CC en sus actividades de I + D. El capítulo 4, presenta el diseño de una novedosa herramienta con un algoritmo didáctico para la medición anticipada de la huella de carbono en los proyectos de investigación e innovación. Esta herramienta permite a los investigadores que no tienen formación en evaluación del impacto ambiental estimar las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero de sus proyectos de investigación e innovación en las primeras etapas, momento en el que la anticipación y la reflexividad son las dimensiones fundamentales de la RRI.
[CA] L'escalfament global, i el canvi climàtic (CC) que produeix, és una de les amenaces més globals i urgents de les que és responsable la humanitat. El desafiament de mitigar i adaptar-se a la CC, entre d'altres, és una responsabilitat que ha arribat a totes les disciplines, incloent el procés de recerca i innovació. Durant més de 10 anys, i com una forma d'abordar aquests grans desafiaments del nostre temps, amb la intenció de fomentar la investigació responsable, la Comissió Europea ha estat promovent una temàtica transversal anomenada: "Recerca i innovació responsable (RRI, en seves sigles en anglès)". L'objectiu és treure a la llum els problemes relacionats amb la investigació i la innovació, anticipar les seves conseqüències i fer participar la societat en el debat sobre la forma en què la ciència i la tecnologia poden contribuir a crear el tipus de món i de societat que desitgem per a les generacions futures. Aquesta tesi sorgeix com un pont entre el gran desafiament que representa el CC i la demanda per part de la societat d'investigació i innovació responsable, abordada en el context de la RRI. Els finançadors i impulsors de la investigació i la societat en el seu conjunt esperen que els equips de recerca i innovació proporcionin resultats socialment desitjables, èticament acceptables i sostenibles. Per tant, la pregunta general que respon a aquesta tesi és: com sap un equip d'investigació, sense ser especialista en avaluació ambiental, si la seva investigació és responsable d'emissions contribuents a el canvi climàtic, i com pot incloure mesures per reduir o compensar aquestes emissions de gasos d'efecte hivernacle (GEH)? Per respondre a aquesta pregunta, la present tesi doctoral s'inicia amb la descripció dels principals fonaments que són centrals en ella CC i RRI. Pel que fa a el primer concepte, expliquem la importància i els mitjans per calcular la contribució a l'CC, principalment l'enfocament de la Petjada de Carboni. Pel que fa a el segon concepte, s'explica l'alineació d'aquesta tesi l'àrea clau de la sostenibilitat ambiental de la RRI, els seus marcs substantius i les seves dimensions d'anticipació i reflexivitat. Un cop establerts aquests dos fonaments, el canvi climàtic s'aborda en el context de la RRI, revisant la literatura sobre els projectes i propostes de la RRI, incloent la sostenibilitat ambiental, i el CC en particular. Com a resultat, van sorgir dues avingudes de recerca, que es desenvolupen en les següents seccions. Una avinguda sobre com avaluar la influència de les parts interessades en un projecte d'investigació en el context de la RRI, desenvolupada en el capítol 3, i una avinguda sobre la necessitat de noves eines basades en bases de dades d'accés obert per ajudar els professionals a integrar la prevenció de CC en les seves activitats d'R + d. El capítol 4, presenta el disseny d'una nova eina amb un algoritme didàctic per al mesurament anticipada de la petjada de carboni en els projectes de recerca i innovació. Aquesta eina permet als investigadors que no tenen formació en avaluació de l'impacte ambiental estimar les emissions de gasos d'efecte hivernacle dels seus projectes de recerca i innovació en les primeres etapes, moment en el qual l'anticipació i la reflexivitat són les dimensions fonamentals de la RRI.
[EN] Global Warming, and the climate change (CC) it produces, is one of the most global and urgent threats humankinds is responsible for. The challenge of mitigating and adapting to CC, among others, is a responsibility that has reached all disciplines, including the research and innovation (R&I) process. For more than 10 years, and as a way to tackle these great challenges of our time, with the intention of fostering responsible research, the European Commission has been promoting a cross-cutting issue named: "Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)". The aim is to bring the problems (such as research integrity, non-inclusion of stakeholders, application of ethical or sustainability principles, etc.,.) related to R&I to light, to anticipate the possible consequences of R&I process and outcomes, and to engage society in the discussion of how science and technology can help create the kind of world and society we want for generations to come. This thesis emerges as a bridge between the great challenge represented by CC and the demand for responsibility from R&I process and outcomes, addressed in the context of RRI. Research funders and society as a whole claim that R&I teams must provide socially desirable, ethically acceptable, and sustainable outcomes. Hence, the general question to be answered in this thesis is: how does a research team, while not being specialists, know if its research is responsible for relevant contributions to CC, and how can they include measures to reduce or compensate such contributions (Greenhouse Gas emissions, GHG)? To respond to this question, the present dissertation begins with the main foundations that are central to it: CC and RRI. As regards the former concept, we explain the importance and means to calculate the contribution of GHG to CC, mainly the carbon footprint approach. In addition, regarding the latter, how this thesis aligns with the key RRIs' area of environmental sustainability, its substantive frameworks and its anticipation and reflexivity dimensions. Once these two foundations are established, CC is addressed in the context of RRI, reviewing the literature on RRI projects and proposals, which include environmental sustainability, and CC in particular. As a result, two avenues of research arise, which are developed in the following sections. An avenue about how to assess the stakeholders' influence in a research project within the context of RRI, which is developed in chapter 3, and an avenue about the need for new tools based on open-access databases to help practitioners to integrate CC prevention in their R&I activities. Chapter 4 presents the design of a novel tool with a didactic algorithm for anticipatory carbon footprint measuring in R&I projects. This tool allows researchers who are untrained in environmental impact assessment to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions of their R&I projects at early stages, when anticipation and reflexivity are the core RRI dimensions.
Ligardo Herrera, IE. (2021). Addressing Climate Change in Research and Innovation Projects. A Tool for Anticipatory Carbon Footprint Calculation [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/165867
TESIS
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Terradellas, M. Rosa. "Innovació i recerca responsables i processos de cocreació a l'educació superior." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Girona, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/671926.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis is structured in two applied researches. One, focused on how to embed the transversal competence of sustainability to undergraduate studies at the UdG. The other promotes an innovation in teacher education, by applying the methodology of Challenge-Based Learning (CBL). Both share that they use co-creation processes, involving internal and external agents of the university community. With these studies, we seek to demonstrate that innovations and researches become responsibles, to higher education, when we incorporate co-creation processes involving stakeholders from the university community and social agents. It focuses on the socio-critical paradigm, action research and participant observation. It establishes the phases of the co-creation processes, the types of participants, the data collection system and the analysis of the results in relation to the objectives. Its methodological rigor is assessed in relation to RRI and qualitative research. Conclusions and proposals for the future are established
Aquesta tesi s’estructura en dues recerques aplicades. Una, centrada en com incorporar la competència transversal de la sostenibilitat als estudis de grau de la UdG. L’altra promou una innovació en la formació de mestres aplicant la metodologia de l’aprenentatge basat en reptes (ABR). Ambdues comparteixen que apliquen processos de cocreació, implicant agents interns i externs a la comunitat universitària. Amb elles volem demostrar que les innovacions i recerques esdevenen responsables, a l’educació superior, quan hi incorporem processos de cocreació en els quals intervenen grups d’interès de la comunitat universitària i agents socials. Es centra en el paradigma sociocrític, la recerca acció i l’observació participant. Estableix les fases dels processos de cocreació, les tipologies de participants, el sistema d’obtenció de dades i l’anàlisi dels resultats en relació als objectius. Es valora el seu rigor metodològic en relació a la RRI i a les recerques qualitatives. S’estableixen conclusions i propostes de futur
Programa de Doctorat en Educació
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jarmai, Katharina, and Heike Christiane Vogel-Pöschl. "Meaningful collaboration for responsible innovation." Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. http://epub.wu.ac.at/7026/1/23299460.2019.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
Many innovative businesses have discovered an added value in collaborating with experts, users or other stakeholders in developing innovative products or services. Not all collaboration with stakeholders, however, corresponds to the criteria for opening up an innovation process to the needs of societal actors under the terms of responsible innovation. The question of what makes collaboration meaningful in the sense of responsible innovation was presented and discussed in a 75 min workshop at the European Science Open Forum (ESOF) in Toulouse, France in June 2018. Identified success factors and challenges for making a collaboration process meaningful for the collaborating parties highlight the importance of competent process preparation and facilitation, investment of time and effort to enable mutual understanding and the development of trustful relationships as well as the collaborating partners' willingness to implement changes that result from the collaboration process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Responsible research and innovation"

1

Wittrock, Christian, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Auke Pols, Philip Macnaghten, and David Ludwig. Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54286-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Richard, Owen, and J. R. Bessant. Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Iatridis, Konstantinos, and Doris Schroeder. Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21693-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Deserti, Alessandro, Marion Real, and Felicitas Schmittinger, eds. Co-creation for Responsible Research and Innovation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78733-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pellé, Sophie, and Bernard Reber. From Ethical Review to Responsible Research and Innovation. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119318422.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Grunwald, Armin. The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley &;#38; Sons, Inc., 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119340898.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ferri, Fernando, Ned Dwyer, Saša Raicevich, Patrizia Grifoni, Husne Altiok, Hans Thor Andersen, Yiannis Laouris, and Cecilia Silvestri. Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73105-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ferri, Fernando, Ned Dwyer, Saša Raicevich, Patrizia Grifoni, Husne Altiok, Hans Thor Andersen, Yiannis Laouris, and Cecilia Silvestri. Responsible Research and Innovation Actions in Science Education, Gender and Ethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Owen, Richard, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, eds. Responsible Innovation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jarmai, Katharina, ed. Responsible Innovation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1720-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Responsible research and innovation"

1

von Schomberg, René. "A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation." In Responsible Innovation, 51–74. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Timmermans, Job. "Responsible Research and Innovation." In Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 847–58. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95867-5_46.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Timmermans, Job. "Responsible Research and Innovation." In Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_46-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jain, Trilok Kumar, and Nirupa Jain. "Responsible Research and Innovation." In Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, 1–9. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_79-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Jain, Trilok Kumar, and Nirupa Jain. "Responsible Research and Innovation." In Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, 928–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95873-6_79.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Grinbaum, Alexei. "Responsible Research and Innovation." In Handbuch Technikethik, 472–76. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04901-8_90.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Stahl, Bernd Carsten, Grace Eden, and Marina Jirotka. "Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs." In Responsible Innovation, 199–218. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Asveld, Lotte, and Rietje van Dam-Mieras. "Introduction: Responsible Research and Innovation for Sustainability." In Responsible Innovation 3, 1–6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

De Winter, Jan. "How (Not) to Reform Biomedical Research: A Review of Some Policy Proposals." In Responsible Innovation 1, 97–110. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Brulé, Gaël, and Francis Munier. "Responsible Research and Innovation and Innovation-Care." In SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research, 77–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82685-7_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Responsible research and innovation"

1

Knyazev, N. A. "Base university in regional innovation policy." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.54.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sabirova, Diana T. "Innovations Marketing System at Enterprises." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.62.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Chistyakova, Natalia. "Innovation networks: problems and prospects (Russian case study)." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Firstov, V. "Management System for Metrological Provision of Innovation Technologies." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.31.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Burget, Mirjam, Emanuele Bardone, and Margus Pedaste. "DIMENSIONS OF RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION." In International Technology, Education and Development Conference. IATED, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.1229.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Chernikova, Irina V. "Paradigm of Technoscience and Responsible Research and Innovation Approach." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Chudesova, G. P. "Defining Zones of Innovation Attractiveness for Science-Intensive Industrial Enterprise." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Abdulvaliev, Almaz F. "Legal Support Of Indigenous Minorities Living In Areas With Special Geographical Conditions." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Barysheva, Galina A. "Ageing Population: Challenge for New Quality of Social Policy." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Pokrovskaia, Natalia V. "Tax Burden of Russian Oil Companies after Tax Consolidation." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.100.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Responsible research and innovation"

1

Peissl, Walter, ed. Responsible research and innovation in ICT: The case of privacy. Vienna: self, November 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/ita-pa-wp_11_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fernández-Beltrán, F., D. García-Marzá, R. Sanahuja Sanahuja, S. Barberá Forcadell, and A. Andrés Martínez. Managing communication to for the promotion of Responsible Research and Innovation: a proposal of protocol proposal from discourse from the ethics. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, September 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2017-1207en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Merk, Christine. Summary report on Workshop 1 laypersons’ perceptions of marine CDR, Deliverable 3.1. OceanNETs, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3289/oceannets_d3.1.

Full text
Abstract:
This deliverable reports about the successful completion of three group discussions on marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR) with laypersons in Germany. The 2-hour group discussions were held online. 5 participants discussed these three topics: (1) the environmental state of the oceans, (2) four selected marine CDR approaches, and (3) responsible research and innovation. The four approaches were ocean fertilization, ocean alkalinization via ocean liming and electrochemical weathering in desalination plants, artificial upwelling, and blue carbon management via kelp forests, mangroves and seagrass meadows.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Veland, Siri. Summary report on Workshop 2 laypersons’ perceptions of marine CDR, Deliverable 3.2. OceanNETs, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3289/oceannets_d3.2.

Full text
Abstract:
This deliverable reports about the successful completion of three group discussions on marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR) with laypersons in Norway. The 2-hour group discussions were held online. In three groups, and a pilot group, between 2 and 7 participants discussed these three topics: (1) the environmental state of the oceans, (2) four selected marine CDR approaches, and (3) responsible research and innovation. The four approaches were ocean fertilization, ocean alkalinization via ocean liming and electrochemical weathering in desalination plants, artificial upwelling, and blue carbon management via kelp forests, mangroves and seagrass meadows.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Davies, Erika W., and Diane D. Edwards. Promoting Responsible Scientific Research. American Society for Microbiology, October 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aamcol.oct.2015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Konrad, Kornelia, Verena Schulze Greiving, and Paul Benneworth. The role of user-led regional innovation networks in shaping responsible innovation in eHealth. University of Twente, Science, Technology & Policy Studies, December 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-2169.2018.01.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Arrison, Thomas. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1126508.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fitzgerald, Helena, Gerard Walsh, Gabriela Avram, Stephen Kinsella, and Javier Burón García. Balancing Urban Innovation with a Responsible Approach to the Internet of Things: The Case of Limerick. ThingsCon e.V, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31880/10344/10122.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Moser, Petra. Economics of Research and Innovation in Agriculture. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w27080.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Veland, Siri, and Christine Merk. Lay person perceptions of marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR) – Working paper. OceanNETs, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3289/oceannets_d3.3.

Full text
Abstract:
This working paper presents first insights on lay public perceptions of marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approaches. In seven focus groups, three in Germany and four in Norway (including one pilot) the researchers asked members of the lay public to share their views of the ocean and the effects of climate change, four CDR approaches, as well as their reflections on responsible research and innovation (RRI) of marine CDR. The four CDR methods were ocean iron fertilization, ocean alkalinity enhancement, artificial upwelling, and blue carbon management through restoration of coastal and marine ecosystems. In addition, respondents were asked to compare the four approaches. Our findings indicate that the public will be very supportive of blue carbon management irrespective of its actual carbon sequestration potential, due in part to the perceived bad state of marine ecosystems worldwide. Participants were skeptical whether any of the CDR approaches could have relevant effect on carbon sequestration and long-term storage; they reasoned about issues such as the ability to scale up treatments in time and space, unforeseen or unforeseeable effects on ecosystems in time and space, and the role of industry in the implementation process. They argued that despite the potential availability of marine CDR, industry and the general public should stop polluting behaviors and practices. Nevertheless, the participants universally agreed that further research on all four CDR methods should be pursued to better understand effects on climate, ecosystems, local communities, and the economy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Responsible research and innovation' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography